Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Brian Higgins was drinking alcohol at lunchtime on his way back from NY. Brian Higgins dropped his work vehicle back at Canton PD "because it was against their policy"......(to drink and then drive a police issued vehicle), but it's ok to drink and then drive his personal vehicle 🤔...

RubyD_JinaG's profile picture

RubyD

1,380 subscribers

106,292 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody
3:09

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Dixie Normus

30,755 views • 8 months ago

Timeline Question of the Day So just to recap… Brian Higgins testified that Chief Berkowitz called him early in the morning about John O’Keefe, a call Higgins says he missed. But here’s the fun part No one testified that they called Berkowitz. No one testified that they spoke to Berkowitz before 6:30 AM. Higgins says he called Brian Albert first, Then he headed straight to 34 Fairview So naturally the question becomes… Who told Berkowitz? When did they tell him? And how did he know to call Higgins before Higgins knew anything? No one admits calling Berkowitz, Yet Berkowitz somehow had the info early enough to be calling people Amazing work, everyone. This timeline didn’t just have a hangover it woke up knowing things before anyone told it. Before testifying, Brian Higgins probably should’ve called Jen McCabe first. Not about the facts, but about how to make time bend, how to shave an hour off a drive, and how to be asleep and awake at the same time. She could’ve helped him, Leave at 12:30 but arrive at 1:26 Drive 9 miles in a blizzard in record time, Have drinks, eat, go to bed, answer 2:22 AM calls, and still be “asleep” Run on 4 hours of sleep after spending the day in NYC, driving back to canton, bar hopping, 34 Fairview, CPD, and a full day back at the station And maybe most importantly Explain how to testify with a timeline hangover that bad Missed opportunity, honestly. Jen’s got experience making the math work. even the phone calls have no witnesses
2:35

Timeline Question of the Day So just to recap… Brian Higgins testified that Chief Berkowitz called him early in the morning about John O’Keefe, a call Higgins says he missed. But here’s the fun part No one testified that they called Berkowitz. No one testified that they spoke to Berkowitz before 6:30 AM. Higgins says he called Brian Albert first, Then he headed straight to 34 Fairview So naturally the question becomes… Who told Berkowitz? When did they tell him? And how did he know to call Higgins before Higgins knew anything? No one admits calling Berkowitz, Yet Berkowitz somehow had the info early enough to be calling people Amazing work, everyone. This timeline didn’t just have a hangover it woke up knowing things before anyone told it. Before testifying, Brian Higgins probably should’ve called Jen McCabe first. Not about the facts, but about how to make time bend, how to shave an hour off a drive, and how to be asleep and awake at the same time. She could’ve helped him, Leave at 12:30 but arrive at 1:26 Drive 9 miles in a blizzard in record time, Have drinks, eat, go to bed, answer 2:22 AM calls, and still be “asleep” Run on 4 hours of sleep after spending the day in NYC, driving back to canton, bar hopping, 34 Fairview, CPD, and a full day back at the station And maybe most importantly Explain how to testify with a timeline hangover that bad Missed opportunity, honestly. Jen’s got experience making the math work. even the phone calls have no witnesses

Dixie Normus

36,104 views • 8 months ago

Brian Albert takes the stand and tells everyone “We drove back to Canton and met Brian Higgins at the Hillside around 9–9:30… had a drink… hung out for a while.” Simple enough, right? Nice clean timeline New York Hillside waterfall Home Then along comes… inconvenient documentation. Sara Levinson’s statement says Sara arrives at Fairview around 8:00 PM She told police Brian Sr. (Albert) arrived home from New York , With a friend Later leaves again with Nicole to go to a bar Maybe they should’ve checked in with Jen’s sister, Denise Galvin… you know… the unofficial “timeline coordinator.”
0:20

Brian Albert takes the stand and tells everyone “We drove back to Canton and met Brian Higgins at the Hillside around 9–9:30… had a drink… hung out for a while.” Simple enough, right? Nice clean timeline New York Hillside waterfall Home Then along comes… inconvenient documentation. Sara Levinson’s statement says Sara arrives at Fairview around 8:00 PM She told police Brian Sr. (Albert) arrived home from New York , With a friend Later leaves again with Nicole to go to a bar Maybe they should’ve checked in with Jen’s sister, Denise Galvin… you know… the unofficial “timeline coordinator.”

Dixie Normus

24,805 views • 5 months ago

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.
0:52

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.

Dixie Normus

24,189 views • 8 months ago

So Brian A goes into the kitchen, sees colin then goes to the bathroom, he then goes upstairs, because the dog was barking and of course, he's gonna take the dog out, but he says the dog was barking because people were in the house. Well, people were in the house All night, wouldn't the dog have been barking All night. Also where was Brian Higgins during all of this? We do know he was inside the house when jen was on the phone with john according to yuri.. And brian says the dog was downstairs At this time also.
1:39

So Brian A goes into the kitchen, sees colin then goes to the bathroom, he then goes upstairs, because the dog was barking and of course, he's gonna take the dog out, but he says the dog was barking because people were in the house. Well, people were in the house All night, wouldn't the dog have been barking All night. Also where was Brian Higgins during all of this? We do know he was inside the house when jen was on the phone with john according to yuri.. And brian says the dog was downstairs At this time also.

Dixie Normus

17,459 views • 2 months ago

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.
0:11

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.

Aidan Kearney

305,625 views • 1 year ago

Brian Higgins joins the elite squad of people who simply cannot get their stories straight when it comes to the Karen Read investigation. Back in Trial 1, Higgins testified under oath that he returned to the Canton Police Department to move work vehicles, Not his own. No, no. Strictly professional. Like a responsible, tax-paid, selfless public servant doing administrative work clearly the kind that involves keys, gear shifts, and, evidently, parking spots. But then, the video drops like a bad mixtape! It shows Higgins arriving in his own vehicle… getting out… fiddling around in the two alleged “work vehicles”… and then plot twist leaving in the exact same personal vehicle he showed up in. So much for valet duty. But wait, there’s more! When talking to the grand jury, Higgins pivoted his explanation to say he returned for “administrative work.” You know paperwork, memos, and maybe a quick chat with Goodie! Because nothing says “admin duties” like a latenight cruise around the parking lot pretending to move vehicles. And here’s the kicker, moving personal vehicles isn’t even considered administrative work. That means Higgins didn’t just fudge one excuse he managed to be wrong twice under oath, across two different legal settings. Congratulations, Brian. You're now part of an exclusive club with Kerry Roberts (who lied to a grand jury) and Jen McCabe (who lied to federal agents and also possibly Google). All three should consider forming a barbershop trio called Perjury & the Coverups. This isn’t a coincidence anymore. It’s a strategy one where everyone keeps stepping on the same rake and acting surprised when it hits them in the face. Except this time, it is on video.
1:16

Brian Higgins joins the elite squad of people who simply cannot get their stories straight when it comes to the Karen Read investigation. Back in Trial 1, Higgins testified under oath that he returned to the Canton Police Department to move work vehicles, Not his own. No, no. Strictly professional. Like a responsible, tax-paid, selfless public servant doing administrative work clearly the kind that involves keys, gear shifts, and, evidently, parking spots. But then, the video drops like a bad mixtape! It shows Higgins arriving in his own vehicle… getting out… fiddling around in the two alleged “work vehicles”… and then plot twist leaving in the exact same personal vehicle he showed up in. So much for valet duty. But wait, there’s more! When talking to the grand jury, Higgins pivoted his explanation to say he returned for “administrative work.” You know paperwork, memos, and maybe a quick chat with Goodie! Because nothing says “admin duties” like a latenight cruise around the parking lot pretending to move vehicles. And here’s the kicker, moving personal vehicles isn’t even considered administrative work. That means Higgins didn’t just fudge one excuse he managed to be wrong twice under oath, across two different legal settings. Congratulations, Brian. You're now part of an exclusive club with Kerry Roberts (who lied to a grand jury) and Jen McCabe (who lied to federal agents and also possibly Google). All three should consider forming a barbershop trio called Perjury & the Coverups. This isn’t a coincidence anymore. It’s a strategy one where everyone keeps stepping on the same rake and acting surprised when it hits them in the face. Except this time, it is on video.

Dixie Normus

69,598 views • 1 year ago

3 witnesses, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, and Brian Higgins ALL testified to the exact location of Higgins Jeep on January 29, 2022. Very specific testimony the Jeep was directly in from of the mailbox at 34 Fairview Rd. That’s a problem for Dr. Welcher’s theory of Karen Read’s Lexus LX570 driving backwards 53 Ft during key cycle and still moving 24 mph. #KarenReadTrial
3:21

3 witnesses, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, and Brian Higgins ALL testified to the exact location of Higgins Jeep on January 29, 2022. Very specific testimony the Jeep was directly in from of the mailbox at 34 Fairview Rd. That’s a problem for Dr. Welcher’s theory of Karen Read’s Lexus LX570 driving backwards 53 Ft during key cycle and still moving 24 mph. #KarenReadTrial

Leah Baker

88,223 views • 1 year ago

I find it fascinating that the attorneys representing the HAM plaintiffs, and their online cohorts, are bringing up the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL) when discussing phone evidence. Because one of the HAMs themselves, Brian Higgins, actually used that resource for his own phone. On January 30th, 2022, Higgins called his "best friend" ATF Agent Matt Kelch, who Higgins described as being good with the "phone stuff." He asked Kelch how he could "pull text strings off (his) phone" so he could provide them to state police. For timeline-wise, this phone call occurred one day after the death of John O'Keefe. Kelch walked him through it, and Higgins went to the FBI RCFL facility and used a kiosk on the first floor to extract selected information from his phone. Flash forward to September 22nd, 2022 when Karen Read's defense team publicly sought an order requiring Higgins to preserve his phone for forensic examination. Six days later, with the preservation order about to be served, Higgins got a new phone and changed his number. The next day, September 30th, he is officially served. Higgins was eventually interviewed by federal prosecutors in May of 2023 and discussed what he had done with the phone. During this portion of trial testimony, it is revealed that Higgins had removed the "cut or broken" SIM card from his original phone, possibly destroyed that same phone and threw away the two items at two different dumpsters on a military base. It was also testified to that he was eventually placed on desk duty, but the public record doesn't establish why. Could his use of a federal forensic resource in the RCFL building to extract information from his personal phone have played a role? I don't know. But considering Higgins' lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney includes claims involving his employment and professional reputation, discovery could potentially shed light on why he was placed on leave/desk duty, what his supervisors knew about the phone, and whether those events were connected. Maybe future filings will finally answer that question. 🫠
5:16

I find it fascinating that the attorneys representing the HAM plaintiffs, and their online cohorts, are bringing up the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL) when discussing phone evidence. Because one of the HAMs themselves, Brian Higgins, actually used that resource for his own phone. On January 30th, 2022, Higgins called his "best friend" ATF Agent Matt Kelch, who Higgins described as being good with the "phone stuff." He asked Kelch how he could "pull text strings off (his) phone" so he could provide them to state police. For timeline-wise, this phone call occurred one day after the death of John O'Keefe. Kelch walked him through it, and Higgins went to the FBI RCFL facility and used a kiosk on the first floor to extract selected information from his phone. Flash forward to September 22nd, 2022 when Karen Read's defense team publicly sought an order requiring Higgins to preserve his phone for forensic examination. Six days later, with the preservation order about to be served, Higgins got a new phone and changed his number. The next day, September 30th, he is officially served. Higgins was eventually interviewed by federal prosecutors in May of 2023 and discussed what he had done with the phone. During this portion of trial testimony, it is revealed that Higgins had removed the "cut or broken" SIM card from his original phone, possibly destroyed that same phone and threw away the two items at two different dumpsters on a military base. It was also testified to that he was eventually placed on desk duty, but the public record doesn't establish why. Could his use of a federal forensic resource in the RCFL building to extract information from his personal phone have played a role? I don't know. But considering Higgins' lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney includes claims involving his employment and professional reputation, discovery could potentially shed light on why he was placed on leave/desk duty, what his supervisors knew about the phone, and whether those events were connected. Maybe future filings will finally answer that question. 🫠

BoozeyBeauty

35,204 views • 12 days ago

At 7:55 AM, Jen McCabe texts Brian Albert a Dunkin order “large hot with cream and sugar.” Julie Albert testified she woke up around 8-ish, went to Dunkin, then arrived at 34 Fairview Road around 8:30, where Brian Albert waved her into the house. But Julie also testified she parked behind her nephew’s vehicle. Problem is, That vehicle does NOT appear in earlier Canton PD scene photographs while officers were still on scene until roughly 7:50 AM. So when did the vehicle arrive? Who drove it there? Did Brian leave after CPD cleared the first time? Did Brian return before Lank and Gallagher came back? Was Brian Albert continuously inside the house that entire morning… or not?
0:37

At 7:55 AM, Jen McCabe texts Brian Albert a Dunkin order “large hot with cream and sugar.” Julie Albert testified she woke up around 8-ish, went to Dunkin, then arrived at 34 Fairview Road around 8:30, where Brian Albert waved her into the house. But Julie also testified she parked behind her nephew’s vehicle. Problem is, That vehicle does NOT appear in earlier Canton PD scene photographs while officers were still on scene until roughly 7:50 AM. So when did the vehicle arrive? Who drove it there? Did Brian leave after CPD cleared the first time? Did Brian return before Lank and Gallagher came back? Was Brian Albert continuously inside the house that entire morning… or not?

Dixie Normus

49,957 views • 4 months ago

So the House Defendants’ Support YouTube Channel was back at it the other night and their latest masterpiece? Brian Higgins moved multiple vehicles at CPD, and the surveillance video proves it!” Reality check, Yes Higgins had multiple vehicles at the Canton Police Department. Yes, Higgins said he went to move two of them. But what does the actual surveillance footage show?Higgins moves ONE vehicle. And then? He removes a duffle bag from another vehicle. That's it. That is the list. No second vehicle being moved. No hidden stunt work. No Fast & Furious: Canton Drift. But according to the House Channel, that duffle bag must turn into a whole SUV when you squint hard enough. They’re not “analyzing.” They’re gaslighting, ladies and gentlemen. They also claimed that “It all happened at the exact time the plows came through!” Oh really? Funny, because when you watch the surveillance? ZERO plow trucks. Not one. Not even the reflection of a plow. Not even the shadow of a plow. Not even a toddler’s plastic plow from Fisher-Price. But hey,why let the absence of plows stop you from insisting that plows were there? Oh, and here’s the kicker, What they are pushing directly contradicts the sworn testimony of Officer Sean Goode. Goode testified that CPD vehicles are supposed to be parked along the outer edge of the lot so DPW plows can make a clean pass. Meaning, If plows had actually arrived, everybody in that lot would’ve been moved out of the way. The vehicles would’ve been repositioned. There would’ve been activity on camera. Instead? Nothing. Nada. A whole lot of No Plow, Big Wow. But the House Channel ladies? They just keep on insisting, because when the facts don’t fit the narrative, they simply… invent new facts. So next time the House Defendant Cheer Squad wants to tell us what the video shows… maybe they should try watching the video first, not daydreaming their way through it. Because out here in the real world, one vehicle moved, one duffle bag removed, and absolutely zero plows in sight. Gaslight much, ladies?” And let's not get into the 12 minutes of Goode and Higgins in the control room but never speaking to each other!
2:35

So the House Defendants’ Support YouTube Channel was back at it the other night and their latest masterpiece? Brian Higgins moved multiple vehicles at CPD, and the surveillance video proves it!” Reality check, Yes Higgins had multiple vehicles at the Canton Police Department. Yes, Higgins said he went to move two of them. But what does the actual surveillance footage show?Higgins moves ONE vehicle. And then? He removes a duffle bag from another vehicle. That's it. That is the list. No second vehicle being moved. No hidden stunt work. No Fast & Furious: Canton Drift. But according to the House Channel, that duffle bag must turn into a whole SUV when you squint hard enough. They’re not “analyzing.” They’re gaslighting, ladies and gentlemen. They also claimed that “It all happened at the exact time the plows came through!” Oh really? Funny, because when you watch the surveillance? ZERO plow trucks. Not one. Not even the reflection of a plow. Not even the shadow of a plow. Not even a toddler’s plastic plow from Fisher-Price. But hey,why let the absence of plows stop you from insisting that plows were there? Oh, and here’s the kicker, What they are pushing directly contradicts the sworn testimony of Officer Sean Goode. Goode testified that CPD vehicles are supposed to be parked along the outer edge of the lot so DPW plows can make a clean pass. Meaning, If plows had actually arrived, everybody in that lot would’ve been moved out of the way. The vehicles would’ve been repositioned. There would’ve been activity on camera. Instead? Nothing. Nada. A whole lot of No Plow, Big Wow. But the House Channel ladies? They just keep on insisting, because when the facts don’t fit the narrative, they simply… invent new facts. So next time the House Defendant Cheer Squad wants to tell us what the video shows… maybe they should try watching the video first, not daydreaming their way through it. Because out here in the real world, one vehicle moved, one duffle bag removed, and absolutely zero plows in sight. Gaslight much, ladies?” And let's not get into the 12 minutes of Goode and Higgins in the control room but never speaking to each other!

Dixie Normus

18,850 views • 9 months ago

Think about this for a moment. Imagine how drunk Brian Albert and Brian Higgins were that night at the Waterfall bar and afterwards. They are openly grabbing each other's asses and kissing each other. John is seeing this. I'm not saying this is the reason, but they are doing this in front of a lot of people. How drunk do you think you have to be after drinking all day in New York City for the funeral and spending the night together, right? Then driving home and going to a bar and then another bar. Anything could have happened with the amount of alcohol these two had in them. #McAlberts Aidan Kearney
0:23

Think about this for a moment. Imagine how drunk Brian Albert and Brian Higgins were that night at the Waterfall bar and afterwards. They are openly grabbing each other's asses and kissing each other. John is seeing this. I'm not saying this is the reason, but they are doing this in front of a lot of people. How drunk do you think you have to be after drinking all day in New York City for the funeral and spending the night together, right? Then driving home and going to a bar and then another bar. Anything could have happened with the amount of alcohol these two had in them. #McAlberts Aidan Kearney

r2d2

22,026 views • 4 months ago

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.
2:08

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.

Julie Carpenter

16,137 views • 1 year ago

Not to tale you all away from the drama but....lets think about John Okeefe for a moment. The Feds may not yet know who killed John O’Keefe but if they’re doing their jobs, they’re almost certainly looking at who covered it up. And if there was a cover-up, the key players weren’t ordinary bystanders. They were people with power, influence, and badges the very people who could trigger federal civil-rights charges. Did the Albert family, their relatives inside 34 Fairview, and Brian Higgins receive “professional courtesy” from the Massachusetts State Police, especially from Unit Commander Brian Tully, while Karen Read and Brian “Lucky” Loughran were treated as suspects? Let’s revisit how Tully’s role shaped this entire case: January 29, 2022 Tully admits he was alerted to John’s death around 7 a.m. Yet instead of going to 34 Fairview, he stayed away, by his own testimony, he didn’t leave his house until after noon. All day, no MSP personnel secured 34 Fairview; Canton Police walked off, leaving the scene unprotected. Communications: From the start, Tully was in constant contact with ADA Morrissey, MSP Sgt. Yuri, and Canton Chief Ken Berkowitz, all by phone. Tully was asked on the stand whether Morrissey’s immediate involvement was “normal.” His answer? “It’s not abnormal.” In plain English…high-level coordination from the first hour. Tully claimed his first call to the SERT team leader wasn’t until 2 p.m., hours after the crime scene should have been sealed. By the time he says he arrived, two SERT members and “unidentified Canton officers” were already there which was a major chain-of-custody red flag. Tully testified his troopers pulled footage from the Canton Library and the Temple on Washington Street — but only within narrow windows (12–1 a.m. and 5–6 a.m.). This laser focus on Karen Read’s movements left gaping holes: No effort to corroborate Allie McCabe’s claims of where she drove that night. No exterior footage showing Chris Albert leaving the Waterfall to see which direction he went. No video of Julie, Coco, and Caitlin arriving together — or separately. No footage confirming Brian Albert and Brian Higgins’ staggered arrival stories at the Waterfall. No effort to review the “no movement all night” surveillance from the Canton officer living across from 34 Fairview. No visible proof of Ryan Nagel at the table he claimed at CF McCarthy’s. Meanwhile, the Alberts refused to hand over their Ring footage, and no one compelled it. When you line up all of the witness contradictions against Tully’s testimony and the actual investigative record, a pattern emerges Those closest to law enforcement got a pass. The only people aggressively pursued were outsiders. If Karen Read didn’t kill John O’Keefe, then someone inside 34 Fairview did. But those individuals were connected to high-ranking police and prosecutors who had every ability to protect them and every incentive to point the finger elsewhere. And who had the power to make that happen? Brian Tully – the highest-ranking MSP officer on scene, who oversaw the search after leaving it unsecured all day. Ken Berkowitz,Canton Police Chief who sat on evidence for a year contradicting Higgins’ testimony. Was in the Sallyport when Karen's vehicle arrived at the station, And found taillight pieces while driving by 34 fairview one day Sgt. Yuri Bukkake, who could monitor Trooper Proctor, the eventual “patsy.” DA Morrissey, the one official with the authority to pressure the narrative and protect the group. This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s drawn from sworn testimony. If the Feds are watching, the real story isn’t just who killed John O’Keefe. It’s who used their positions to blindfold an entire investigation. By the way..Allie was in a little blue Ford fusion.... just sayin
1:48

Not to tale you all away from the drama but....lets think about John Okeefe for a moment. The Feds may not yet know who killed John O’Keefe but if they’re doing their jobs, they’re almost certainly looking at who covered it up. And if there was a cover-up, the key players weren’t ordinary bystanders. They were people with power, influence, and badges the very people who could trigger federal civil-rights charges. Did the Albert family, their relatives inside 34 Fairview, and Brian Higgins receive “professional courtesy” from the Massachusetts State Police, especially from Unit Commander Brian Tully, while Karen Read and Brian “Lucky” Loughran were treated as suspects? Let’s revisit how Tully’s role shaped this entire case: January 29, 2022 Tully admits he was alerted to John’s death around 7 a.m. Yet instead of going to 34 Fairview, he stayed away, by his own testimony, he didn’t leave his house until after noon. All day, no MSP personnel secured 34 Fairview; Canton Police walked off, leaving the scene unprotected. Communications: From the start, Tully was in constant contact with ADA Morrissey, MSP Sgt. Yuri, and Canton Chief Ken Berkowitz, all by phone. Tully was asked on the stand whether Morrissey’s immediate involvement was “normal.” His answer? “It’s not abnormal.” In plain English…high-level coordination from the first hour. Tully claimed his first call to the SERT team leader wasn’t until 2 p.m., hours after the crime scene should have been sealed. By the time he says he arrived, two SERT members and “unidentified Canton officers” were already there which was a major chain-of-custody red flag. Tully testified his troopers pulled footage from the Canton Library and the Temple on Washington Street — but only within narrow windows (12–1 a.m. and 5–6 a.m.). This laser focus on Karen Read’s movements left gaping holes: No effort to corroborate Allie McCabe’s claims of where she drove that night. No exterior footage showing Chris Albert leaving the Waterfall to see which direction he went. No video of Julie, Coco, and Caitlin arriving together — or separately. No footage confirming Brian Albert and Brian Higgins’ staggered arrival stories at the Waterfall. No effort to review the “no movement all night” surveillance from the Canton officer living across from 34 Fairview. No visible proof of Ryan Nagel at the table he claimed at CF McCarthy’s. Meanwhile, the Alberts refused to hand over their Ring footage, and no one compelled it. When you line up all of the witness contradictions against Tully’s testimony and the actual investigative record, a pattern emerges Those closest to law enforcement got a pass. The only people aggressively pursued were outsiders. If Karen Read didn’t kill John O’Keefe, then someone inside 34 Fairview did. But those individuals were connected to high-ranking police and prosecutors who had every ability to protect them and every incentive to point the finger elsewhere. And who had the power to make that happen? Brian Tully – the highest-ranking MSP officer on scene, who oversaw the search after leaving it unsecured all day. Ken Berkowitz,Canton Police Chief who sat on evidence for a year contradicting Higgins’ testimony. Was in the Sallyport when Karen's vehicle arrived at the station, And found taillight pieces while driving by 34 fairview one day Sgt. Yuri Bukkake, who could monitor Trooper Proctor, the eventual “patsy.” DA Morrissey, the one official with the authority to pressure the narrative and protect the group. This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s drawn from sworn testimony. If the Feds are watching, the real story isn’t just who killed John O’Keefe. It’s who used their positions to blindfold an entire investigation. By the way..Allie was in a little blue Ford fusion.... just sayin

Dixie Normus

26,631 views • 1 year ago