Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 British intelligence reveals the truth about Putin’s fleet. It’s simply embarrassing London has released satellite images showing Varshavyanka-class submarines, capable of launching Kalibr missiles, in a semi-submerged state. Most of their hulls are hidden underwater, while so-called “cope cages” have been installed over their conning towers. This is...

93,914 просмотров • 19 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

𝗔 $𝟱𝟬𝟬 𝗠𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝘂𝗯 𝘃𝘀. 𝗮 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙀𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙉𝙖𝙫𝙮 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙎𝙚𝙖 Ukraine’s Security Service reports an underwater drone strike against a Russian Project 636.3 Varshavyanka-class submarine at the naval base in Novorossiysk. If confirmed, this would be the first documented use of submersible strike drones against a docked submarine. According to Ukrainian reporting, the attack employed a new “Sub Sea Baby” system, an underwater evolution of earlier surface maritime drones. The Varshavyanka class, known to NATO as the Improved Kilo, is among Russia’s most capable diesel-electric submarines and a frequent launch platform for Kalibr cruise missiles used against Ukrainian cities. Russia denies damage, claiming the underwater vehicle detonated against a pier. Ukrainian-released footage shows a large underwater explosion adjacent to moored warships. Independent reporting confirms a detonation inside the harbor, though the extent of damage remains unverified. The strategic implication is clear. Novorossiysk was selected as a fallback base after Ukrainian surface drone operations forced Russia’s Black Sea Fleet out of Sevastopol and other Crimean peninsula ports. An underwater strike inside that harbor signals that relocation alone does not restore sanctuary. Port defenses appear increasingly inadequate against low-signature, expendable systems designed for confined maritime environments. A single Varshavyanka-class submarine is typically valued at $400–500 million. Ukraine’s maritime drones cost a fraction of that. Even without confirmed destruction, forcing submarines to remain in port degrades Russia’s strike capacity and shifts operational pressure.

OSINT Intuit™

42,450 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

‼️ ZELENSKYY ON A POSSIBLE MAY 9 DRONE ATTACK IN MOSCOW: Neither the U.S. nor Russia has reached out to Ukraine regarding a ceasefire, so Kyiv has no obligations. Talking about a ceasefire just so Russia can celebrate a holiday, after recent massive strikes on Ukraine and the deaths of civilians, is unfair and not serious. Ukrainians don't have any holidays. JOURNALIST: Did you discuss Fico's visit to Moscow for the parade? You said that Ukrainian drones will also fly there. Will they fly or not? Will the Ukrainian delegation fly? ZELENSKYY: Yeah right, our delegation, our strong (drone) delegation (laughing). Well, look, the Americans talked to the Russians about what could be there on May 9: ceasefire or non-ceasefire. No one officially contacted us, did not offer anything officially. Further, this is Russia's war against Ukraine. And so when they discussing a ceasefire between America and Russia, what kind of ceasefire do they have? It is important that our side knows what they are agreeing on. This is the second point. The third point: ceasefire for one day, and before that they are killing our people, well, to put it mildly, it’s just not fair. Well, today the city of Merefa, yesterday Dnipro. Dead, wounded, adults, children. Well, I’m sorry, but after something like this, they’re calling to stop missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities and communities just one day before their parade. They’ll just stop and say, “Hey, you know what? Let’s have a ceasefire for one day”. It’s just not serious. And all of it just to give them the opportunity to hold their holidays. Well, we (Ukrainians) don't have any holidays. We apologize because of Russia, because of their attacks. That is, to give them a holiday, and the morning after May 9th they will keep on killing us again. So we’ll see how it goes.

Kateryna Lisunova

167,430 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад