Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"-Britney, look at me! Does that feel nice? -Perfect!" Guess going Dutch does not just mean splitting the bill 😜 🎞️Britney Submits to Explosive DP ⭐️#BritneyDutch #JoeDiMarco #MarcoBull #threesomeMFM #DP #doubledicked #pumpingpricks #ass #anal #doublepenetration #closeup #cake #moaning #deepdrill #batsen #trio

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

💬Tyrrell Hatton immediate reaction as leader after the second round 📈 QUESTION: I've got to ask you, is practice overrated? HATTON: I don't know about that. It seems to be working okay for me this week. But still a long way to go. QUESTION: Your post-shot reactions are the stuff of legend, but also David Feherty makes a point quite often of how quickly you recover and refocus on the next shot. Does this course force you to do that even more? HATTON: I mean, yeah. This golf course can be very frustrating. Obviously I lose my head around the simplest of golf courses. Maybe guys playing this week, it kind of brings them closer to my level of losing their mind. I'm happy with how I've played the last two days. Even today when it was difficult, I was in some difficult positions, I still didn't feel like I was hitting that bad a golf shot. But it kind of happens around here, and ultimately just happy with how the back nine played out. Yeah, looking forward to the weekend now. QUESTION: Speaking of the weekend, the expectation level starting the week probably didn't sound like it was that high based on what you said yesterday. Does it change with the way you've played through two rounds? HATTON: I mean, I would say that the last two rounds have allowed me to feel more comfortable with what I'm trying to do and feel with the golf swing, and generally I feel like I've hit a lot of really good shots. Kind of taking confidence from that and hoping that I can keep the same feelings going and keep hitting good golf shots. I feel like at times I've holed some nice putts, so it would be nice if I can keep doing that. I mean, it's a quality leaderboard, there's a long way to go, and I'll just keep trying my best. #LIVGolfAndalucia | Legion XIII

LIV Golf

33,632 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rory McIlroy has never minced his words when it comes to his views on LIV Golf. He was asked about it again yesterday, and in typical Rory fashion, after saying he was “too judgemental” with players that went, he then said “if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Speaking after a 5 under par 67 to climb inside the top 10 of the Truist Championship, Rory spoke about his thoughts on the news that the Saudi Arabian PIF was pulling funding to the league: “Yeah, look, I think everyone sort of knows my views on LIV and where it stands in the game of golf. I don't think I need to rehash any of that. It's never been for me and, look, it doesn't mean that LIV is going to go away. They're going to go and try and find alternative investment, whatever that may look like. But when one of the wealthiest sovereign wealth funds in the world thinks that you're too expensive for them, that sort of says something (laughing).” He then was asked what a possible route back for players to the PGA Tour would look like: “It's a question if they do want to come back. Obviously we have seen the quotes over the last few days. And, you know, it seems like some of the guys, if -- again, it all depends on what happens to LIV. But if it is a scenario where they have the option to come back and play on the traditional tours, you know, I think Brian Rolapp has said anything that makes this Tour stronger, anything that makes the DP World Tour stronger, I think everyone should be open to that. That's just good business practice. “So, but again I think there's going to be a lot of sort of bridges to cross to get there, just because, you know, obviously the guys over there are under contract and if they are able to keep it going and get a schedule together next year, it seems like those guys are still going to play the majority of their golf on LIV, in whatever form it takes.” That was followed up with a question about whether he was surprised that LIV Golf players have been outspoken about not wanting to return to the PGA Tour: “Yeah, which is totally fine. Like, again, I think I've said at the start, I was probably too judgmental with the guys that went because I was seeing it from my point of view and maybe not seeing it from other points of view. But again, I'm not going to judge anyone for not wanting to play on the PGA Tour. “I don't know, you know, does that mean that they go play DP World Tour maybe; if that's a pathway, that would make the DP World Tour stronger, and I would be delighted with that, because that's my home Tour, at the end of the day. “But this is, if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Rory is 4 shots behind Sungjae Im heading to the weekend at Quail Hollow. Rory McIlroy PGA TOUR Truist Championship

Flushing It

33,565 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Bill Maher scolds Kamala Harris for skipping the Al Smith dinner, calling it a turning point. Joe Scarborough's reaction? Yeah but Trump is going to put me in jail!: Bill Maher: "There was the Al Smith dinner. That is something that I've seen since I've been following politics. I have it every year in New York City. It's for the Catholic Charities or whatever. Every year, the two candidates show up and it's always like something that makes us feel good or has in the past because it's just saying, look, even a few weeks out before the election, we can be on the same stage. We can eat at the same dinner. We can even get up and make jokes about each other, Right. I feel like it's a turning point when we can't even do that and we can't. Kamala didn't show up. I understand why she wouldn't. He's a monster. I mean, and that's when they say you have Trump derangement syndrome. And I would just like to say to my Republican friends, it's not deranged to fear this. It's not deranged. You find this alarming." Joe Scarborough: "His people have said they're going to arrest my producers. He said he was going to shut down CBS because he didn't like how they edited a package in 60 Minutes." Mark Cuban: "Elon is Mr. Free Speech on Twitter. And Donald says he's going to shut down CBS. He's going to shut down his enemies. Elon, not a fucking word." 'it's not deranged to fear this' Excusing Kamala's unprecedented incompetence and disrespect for presidential campaign traditions because you think the other guy is mean is the definition of Trump derangement Syndrome. Mark Cuban complaining about Elon at the end? Don't worry Mark, he has community notes for liars like you.

Eric Abbenante

396,502 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I would love if it was that simplistic. Oh, it's NATO versus BRICS. NATO are bad, so BRICS are good. Yay! Let's support the BRICS. They'll win this fight in the end, and then we'll all live in harmony. I'd like to believe that. I mean, it would be nice if it were true, but it is not true. Demonstrably not true. I've talked about this over and over and over in many different contexts. I've talked about the...BRICS phony opposition...how all of the key positions in things like the New Development Bank and other institutions, BRICS counter institutions to the US, NATO-led institutions like the World Bank, etc...it turns out that they're all populated by the same people who are serving on...over here, and then they serve over here, and they're serving the same agenda. Everything you look at, it turns out it's actually the same thing underneath. On New World next week, last week, me and James Evan Pilato were talking about the digital IDs that the UK is rolling out and that is happening, of course, everywhere else in the world right now. And as I pointed out, well, guess what? Russia just unveiling their digital ID through the Max app or something like that. Anyway, it's the exact same thing. And again, if what we are fighting against is this technocratic top-down control, how on earth is China going to save us from that? That is the paradigm. That is the paragon of technocratic top-down control and surveillance of society. That is what it is predicated on. So they're not going to save you from that agenda. They are that agenda. So yeah, no, we're not going to look to these political saviors. We're not going to look to nation states to save us from this. It's going to come from us or it's not going to happen." James Corbett of 🌎🌏 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

34,070 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Bill Maher: “What does the panel think of the recent shakeup at 60 Minutes? I'm for it. Good night!” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “You’re watching a censorship state be created… [Trump] is using regulatory powers to punish people who oppose him." Bill Maher: “That’s a big charge that you just made, that 60 Minutes itself and CBS itself is now completely MAGA. I don’t see it that way.” Chris Murphy: “It’s not completely MAGA.” Bill Maher: “Well, it’s kind of what you said.” Chris Murphy: “[Trump] is clearly intent on installing people who will tell his story and will keep his critics off the air.” Bill Maher: “Let me ask you this question. I watch 60 Minutes every week. I have since I was a kid. If I didn’t hear all the buzz in the media… would I ever notice that it was any different? I don’t think I would. Would you?” Chris Murphy: “Part of what the allegation is, is that they are killing stories that would be embarrassing for the president. So it’s hard to know what you’re missing in a censorship environment.” Bill Maher: “But I’ve seen ones that are not very favorable to the president… I don’t know if I would have noticed anything different if I hadn’t been reading about it. Also, I just don’t think that being a 60 Minutes correspondent is that hard. I don’t feel like Scott Pelley was a national treasure. Companies change hands all the time. I never liked him, sorry, I never did… ‘Oh my God. 60 Minutes has a new cast.’ So does Saturday Night Live.” “I’m not going to make that decision until I see a smoking g*n... ‘Tick, tick, tick, Candace Owens and Alex Jones on 60 Minutes.’”

RedWave Press

585,897 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

ScottAdamsVids

104,969 просмотров • 1 год назад

Qullamaggie on If You Want Elite Returns, You Need to Be In The Elite Stocks “NOTV, oh man this is wide and loose. No no no, this is not a stock you want to trade. This is not a trading stock. No. Focus on explosive moves. Look at the prior move on the flagpole. Guys most of you really would do better if you just re-watch the swing trading school videos. The previous move needs to be big okay. It needs to be explosive. Those are the ones you want to focus on, not some random stuff like this. Yeah it's made a big move over the past eight months but it's not a trading stock it's a choppy one. It’s mean reverting. You want explosive stocks. You want to you want to focus on the elite stocks okay. The only way to have elite results is focusing on elite stocks Now, this is what I talk about elite stock. Now, this guy gets it, okay? Big previous move. 170% in two sessions. Pull back. Found support on a rising 10. It's been surfing the rising 10, building higher lows, and now it's tightening the range. Look at this pattern. It's called a triangle. Now, this is an elite stock. If you want to find the stock that has the potential to make a 50% move or a 100% move, you will get it on a stock that has tripled in a few days in the previous few weeks or months. You're not going to get it on a stock that just keeps grinding slowly higher. It's a numbers game, it's an odds game. Now this is a good setup. This is f*cking beautiful, it reminds me about LEDS a month back. LEDS, beautiful. Big previous move, 265% in 3 days, orderly pullback, found support on the 10 day, okay? Look at this, this is a triangle, tightening range, range expansion. And look at the move it did. It went up 263% in the next two weeks. How do you find a move like this? You're not gonna find a breakout of 263% on a stock like... I mean, look at some of the suggestions I've gotten lately. Like, NOTV. The previous move was 20%, not even 20%. SGMS, another, it's a grinder. Okay, 35% these things are very like sluggish, okay? It went up 35% in what, a month? It's not an explosive stock. Focus on the superstars. BYND, this is the one I'm tracking, okay? I'm really excited about this one. I think another one or two days of tightening range, I'm gonna go full retard on it. Look at this, it went up. This is a mid cap. It went up 46% in a week, okay? That's an explosive move. Especially for being a mid cap. Does it matter than the weekly? No, forget about weekly charts. You guys don't need to pay attention to the weekly charts. Don't worry about the weekly charts until you get to 10 plus million. Then you can start worrying about it. No, focus on the daily charts. Focus on one month, three month and six month momentum. That's where you're gonna focus on the strongest stocks across those three timeframes. The 1%, the elite.”

Lone

20,351 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

$PLTR alright folks superbowl coming up after the bell regardless of what happens to the stock, being part of this community and getting to cover Palantir's journey has been one of the greatest blessings in my life. i really can't express my gratitude for people trusting me as a source for their Palantir news and coverage. it's been 4 years, 2k videos, 200 episodes of a weekly Palantir podcast...and I wouldn't have changed a single thing. having said that, we've got a ton of storylines going into earnings that can affect the stock: - is the SARs expense priced in or not? how bad is the hit? - does Palantir need to guide upwards of 35% YoY growth in 2025 for the street to be happy given the multiple its trading at or can they be at 30% and below? - if topline growth isn't as strong, are FCF growth, operating income margins, rule of 40, etc. enough to allow the street to feel Palantir will continue to grow into their potential? - if DeepSeek proved that LLMs are commodities and an LLM company like OpenAI is about to raise at $340B, what does that mean for a company like Palantir that's profitable and growing in the public markets? - what does government growth look like now with DOGE and can Palantir guide for some type of catalyst because of the government's willingness to spend more on software? Overall, I think Dr. Karp, Shaym Sankar and the entire team are going to crush it by essentially making the same argument they have made for 2 years: Palantir creates outcomes and that is what their customers pay for, not LLMs that can be found a dime-a-dozen and simply plugged into AIP, which is the software layered on Foundry that Palantir believes can create such incredible and transformative use cases (and we've seen many case studies of this already) that lead to them becoming one of the most important companies in the world. The stock will likely see algos and headlines that can move it, but this quarter is going to be determined by guidance, their ability to show continued growth and the market's overall interpretation of where Palantir lies in the broader AI sector. TIME TO EMBRACE ANOTHER CHAPTER IN THE ONGOING STORY OF ONE OF THE MOST EXCITING COMPANIES ON PLANET EARTH. & the best part is, we get to all embrace that chapter together, as a community. LFG.

amit

180,556 просмотров • 1 год назад

Good morning, towel friends. I annotated my interview with Will The Glarer and I thought this section was interesting. "You couldn’t honeypot me if you fucking wanted to. I’ll reverse-honeypot you, motherfucker. Go ahead—try to honeypot me. See what happens. I’ll get more intel out of your agent than you’re going to get out of me." **Grant:** It’s because he doesn’t think straight when he has a woman in front of him, for some reason. **Will:** Grant, you’re projecting, my friend. Grant (Analysis): I mean, that’s what I was going to say to Will. He doesn’t understand this, and I don’t know... I don’t feel a need to defend myself, but you’re out of your mind if you think I didn’t date people in college. I mean, I lost 130 pounds from September 2007 to May 2008—specifically because I was at Boston College and I wanted to date people. I’ve had plenty of relationships. I’m just very disciplined—not because I necessarily wanted to be, but because I heard the call to be a priest in 2013, in the spring, right before I became disabled. I was praying to the Virgin Mary—the Virgin Mother, who’s the patroness of the Jesuit order—outside of Bapst Library. I think it was Bapst. I was praying outside. They have these little shrines to the Virgin Mother all around Boston College. I hope they’re still there; I really liked them. But anyway, I was praying to the Virgin Mother, and I’ll never forget that when you hear the call, it is not a joke. You may not choose to pursue discernment, but you are not getting away from that. It’s not your choice. If you hear the call, you’ve been called to serve. That’s it. It’s not a pact. You’ve literally been called to serve. Your life’s never going to be the same again. I was praying, and I heard the call. It was very clear. The call is different for everyone, but for me, it was like: “The world is yours to behold if you can abscond from your temporal inclinations.” Okay, I know what that means. It was not a choice. My entire life changed from that moment. From that moment on, I never thought about video games or Fridays or the weekend—or women—ever the same way again. I would like to have a partner, to love someone and take on the world together, but I never thought about the world the same way again. So a lot of people don’t understand me. People chase me all the time. I’m not interested in that. I turn people down all the time. I’m not being rude; I just don’t want that. I live to serve. Okay, imagine what it would come down to if I tried to be in the life of every person who wanted me to be intimate with them. I cannot do that. I’m meant to help people. If I was just in one person’s life, I’d have commitments to them and their family—and to my family—that would inhibit me from serving, and I can’t do that. I’m married to the cause: my cause, my principles, and the work that I do. And so it’s not... It’s just that people misunderstand—and will misunderstand—how disciplined I am. I am extremely disciplined over my own urges, over my brain. Everything is just logic. So no, it’s not the same for me. You couldn’t honeypot me if you fucking wanted to. I’ll reverse-honeypot you, motherfucker. Go ahead—try to honeypot me. See what happens. I’ll get more intel out of your agent than you’re going to get out of me. So don’t even do it. Most people don’t even bother because I’ll fuck with their head, and I will take the intel. You have to use intel to get intel, and if the person you’re targeting knows what you’re doing, you’re going to get nothing—and they’re going to rip intel out of your honeypot, and you’re going to end up in a negative tactical position. So that’s why I’m like, “No, Will, no.” I could be in a strip club and trade stocks, motherfucker. It does not affect me at all—at all, whatsoever. Completely disciplined. Zero impact. You couldn’t honeypot me if you wanted to. I’ve seen them try. They did try multiple times—blonde women, brunette women, whatever. I don’t have a type. Okay? I only like intelligent women, and I screen them, so you’re not getting anyone in my orbit at all, ever. My point is, though: No, we’re not the same. Will totally tactically misread that. I am not the same. You cannot do that to me because I’m not really interested in that—not because I don’t find it pleasurable or interesting, but because I’m smarter than that. I work in a very high-level apparatus of government as to the coverage that I do. You’re not honeypotting me. So no, I’ve suppressed those urges, and I don’t want to be involved with that. And the call to serve helped, by the way. It’s just not as interesting when you realize there are so many people to help. Why would you... Like, 97% of the population is there to procreate. We need that to happen. Three percent of the people are going to mold society. All right? You know what I’m saying?

Grant Smith Ellis

19,128 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад