Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BTS LIVE AUDIO vs. BROADCAST AUDIO // How AI can affect what audiences hear at home LISTEN TO THE DIFFERENCE: Clips 1 and 2 are the same “MIC Drop” performance: the likely AI-suppressed broadcast audio from Disney+ and Hulu vs. BigHit’s human audio engineer and sound captured by their...

27,437 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von Beyond ARMY ⊙⊝⊜⁷ PIED PIPER, Autumn 🍂, Spring Day
Beyond ARMY ⊙⊝⊜⁷ PIED PIPER, Autumn 🍂, Spring Dayvor 7 Tagen

Fan Cam used in example:

Profilbild von dalia⁷saw HipHopPhile&134340
dalia⁷saw HipHopPhile&134340vor 7 Tagen

Do you have confirmation from somewhere that iheart was using AI during the live broadcast? Is that an industry standard? Genuinely asking cause I don’t know how these festivals work.

Profilbild von Beyond ARMY ⊙⊝⊜⁷ PIED PIPER, Autumn 🍂, Spring Day
Beyond ARMY ⊙⊝⊜⁷ PIED PIPER, Autumn 🍂, Spring Dayvor 7 Tagen

Good and fair question! No, I never confirmed that. I only pointed out that the broadcast audio had several telltale signs of AI sound suppression. The sound from the broadcast was unnaturally low. If you follow the quoted retweets, the original (third going backwards) tweet is a live recording from my iPhone while I was recording the broadcast. One telltale sign is when the audio suddenly goes unnaturally high and low or sounds uneven. When the vocals, instruments and crowd overlap, AI can get confused about which sound belongs where. It blends them all together then separates it. Another big telltale is when it accidentally brings individual voices from the audience to the front. If you listen to the live broadcast during MicDrop and FYA — it sounds in some parts like one single ARMY is singing with BTS. That also happened in the example I made at the end of the video (4th video clip.) In my example at the end, AI did exactly that. I didn’t even have to try to replicate what we heard on Disney+ and Hulu—it happened naturally because the technology simply isn’t there yet. Not all broadcasters use AI. Traditionally, the singers, backup singers, instruments and crowd microphones all have their own audio feeds. A human audio engineer balances them in real time, knowing what to raise, lower, mute or unmute and how much crowd sound to fade in or out. Depending on the show, a live broadcast may run on a 5–20-second delay, but the audio is still mixed live. Dynamic microphones also help. Dynamic microphones are built to pick up the sound directly in front of them while using opposing sound waves to reduce sound coming from elsewhere, including the audience. Basically, one sound wave helps cancel another—similar to noise-canceling headphones. Audio engineers can also use this type of sound cancellation and other controls to reduce the audience noise coming through the microphone feeds. Human audio engineers have every feed listed separately on their consoles. They can hear each layer, know what to listen for and adjust it before everything is combined into the final broadcast mix—just like music recorded in a studio. It’s layers. Think like creating something in Adobe Illustrator or Photoshop — it’s in layers, but audio. Does that make sense? So while never confirmed that they used AI — there were 2 major things that happened in the Disney+ and Hulu broadcast that are big signals that they did use AI and not a human audio engineer.

Ähnliche Videos

Thank you Centre Pompidou Centre Pompidou, everyone who made Nature Manifesto happen, and all the people that took it in. We were happy to see the conversations that the use of AI in Nature Manifesto sparked !! Below is a message from Björk: ~~~ “ the flood of all things from AI is overwhelming !! i am super grateful for your concerns about it´s effects on the environment , it shows you care , are curious and have integrity . i am curious too , i would like to be more informed about the difference of "frugal" AI and the ones that do hugeenvironmental damage and want to be able to choose . i asked around and found out that both the visuals and the audio in our pompidou project were done with "frugal" AI . but i have a lot to learn . when we used some of the AI softwares to merge the animals voices to mine , some of the sounds were great but to be honest , the best blends of their voices and a human were done "manually" , me editing the sounds , choosing piece by piece , looking for personality , musicality and soul . with new technology , i try to use it as a tool to grow , not a crutch . for example when i used melodyne , i used it not for lazy voice progressions but spent even more time when using it . every note in every chord became intentionally more complex . ( for example choir in "thunderbolt" ) and hopefully stretched the potential more out , further than i would have in "normal analog" physical improvisations ... i felt with this new tool i could reach new places in my musical DNA , become MORE personal . more myself . in my opinion , this is how we will work in the future . humans can read emotions on an incredibly high scale . nature made us that way . if there is no soul in tomorrow's music made by AI it is because no-one put it there and we have to speak out and guard this as listeners . ( tbh there is a lot of soulless muzak on spotify already ... they don’t need any AI help for that ...) anything that is mass manufactured without the attention of creativity , is that way . AI or not so it is not about the tool it is what you do with it . " ~~~ The visuals for Nature Manifesto were crafted by the talented Sam Balfus, artificial intelligence being one of the multiple tools used in the process. The sound was produced in collaboration with artist Robin Meier and IRCAM IRCAM. IRCAM develops “frugal AI” capable of generating audio in real-time on local servers without a GPU, thus their models can f.ex. be embedded on tiny Raspberry Pi cards. We asked associate professor and researcher Philippe Esling to provide us with readings; Constance Douwe’s thesis “On the environmental impact of deep generative models for audio” and more, see links below. Nature Manifesto Immersive sound piece 3’40” (2024) 20 November to 9 December, 2024, Centre Pompidou, Paris. Presented as part of the forum “Biodiversity: Which culture for which future?” #ForumBiodiversité Concept and words by Björk & Aleph Music written and composed by Björk Curatorship: Chloé Siganos and Aleph Molinari Associate curator: Delphine Le Gatt Ircam Musical Computing: Robin Meier Wiratunga Sound engineer: Bergur Þórisson Animation: Sam Balfua Video editing: Santiago Molinari With activists: Camille Etienne, Claire Nouvian, Sigrun Perla Gísladóttir, Sæunn Júlía Sigurjónsdóttir, Titouan Pilliard, of BLOOM, Sustainable Ocean Alliance, and Ungir umhverfissinnar. In partnership with D&B Audio and Southby Productions. Reccommended resources :

björk

54,602 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr