Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Building AI workflows for clients taught me one thing fast: most "AI video tools" are demos. Not production tools. Characters drift between scenes. Products lose detail across cuts. Lip-sync passes QA and falls apart the moment it goes live. And every new market means another production branch to rebuild... show more

Rasel Hosen

74,631 subscribers

89,481 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Hot take: most “AI creator” tools are just fancy prompt boxes. This one actually behaves like an agent. I gave it a messy idea and instead of breaking, it: - built visuals (images) - turned them into video - kept iterating without me stepping in every 2 seconds (you can see it in the screen recording 👇) Halfway through using Yapper , it clicked — this thing doesn’t just generate… it works through ideas. That’s the difference: it thinks in workflows, not single outputs. You spend less time prompting…and more time actually creating. Not perfect yet — but it’s one of the first tools that feels like it scales with you. If you’re deep into AI, you’ll see the shift instantly.

Hot take: most “AI creator” tools are just fancy prompt boxes. This one actually behaves like an agent. I gave it a messy idea and instead of breaking, it: - built visuals (images) - turned them into video - kept iterating without me stepping in every 2 seconds (you can see it in the screen recording 👇) Halfway through using Yapper , it clicked — this thing doesn’t just generate… it works through ideas. That’s the difference: it thinks in workflows, not single outputs. You spend less time prompting…and more time actually creating. Not perfect yet — but it’s one of the first tools that feels like it scales with you. If you’re deep into AI, you’ll see the shift instantly.

The AI Guru 💡

50,197 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

claude is cracked for ai digital products. i built a workflow that takes you from raw idea to finished product in one sitting. the same process kids are using to ship ai digital products that are selling right now. here's what's inside: a claude skill that reverse-engineers any problem into a sellable solution 2 paste-ready prompts that write the full PDF for you the 5-stage polish process, mapped start to finish the exact tools for each stage rt + comment 'WORKFLOW' and i'll send the full playbook (must be following so i can dm)

claude is cracked for ai digital products. i built a workflow that takes you from raw idea to finished product in one sitting. the same process kids are using to ship ai digital products that are selling right now. here's what's inside: a claude skill that reverse-engineers any problem into a sellable solution 2 paste-ready prompts that write the full PDF for you the 5-stage polish process, mapped start to finish the exact tools for each stage rt + comment 'WORKFLOW' and i'll send the full playbook (must be following so i can dm)

MONTE

11,560 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

this is ACTUALLY insane. shipping one teardown is the demo. this is what the workflow is actually for. your best ad dies in two weeks. you can't run it harder without burning it out, and you can't clone your way out because andromeda clusters the copies into one entity. nineteen never spend. your winner stays a one-shot, which is rough when it's the only thing working. the brands that scale keep the structure that converts and rebuild everything on top of it. same bones, new person, new setting. distinct enough that the algo reads each as its own ad. the production loop isn't there to ship your winner once. it's there to rebuild it twenty times before it burns.

this is ACTUALLY insane. shipping one teardown is the demo. this is what the workflow is actually for. your best ad dies in two weeks. you can't run it harder without burning it out, and you can't clone your way out because andromeda clusters the copies into one entity. nineteen never spend. your winner stays a one-shot, which is rough when it's the only thing working. the brands that scale keep the structure that converts and rebuild everything on top of it. same bones, new person, new setting. distinct enough that the algo reads each as its own ad. the production loop isn't there to ship your winner once. it's there to rebuild it twenty times before it burns.

Sulfur

11,066 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Most video tools can generate clips. Very few can maintain identity. That has been the real bottleneck in AI video creation. Kling O1 changes that. For the first time, creators can carry a character, style, and visual language across scenes without constant fixes. You can reference past clips, assets, or images and the output stays consistently on-model. No visual drift. No rework loops. No “this doesn’t look like the last shot” moments. It feels less like prompting a tool and more like working with a creative collaborator that remembers context. The impact is practical, not theoretical: → Faster production cycles → Lower iteration costs → Noticeably higher output quality This is what mature AI tooling looks like. Not louder features. Not bigger claims. Just reliability where it actually matters. Consistency is no longer the problem.

Most video tools can generate clips. Very few can maintain identity. That has been the real bottleneck in AI video creation. Kling O1 changes that. For the first time, creators can carry a character, style, and visual language across scenes without constant fixes. You can reference past clips, assets, or images and the output stays consistently on-model. No visual drift. No rework loops. No “this doesn’t look like the last shot” moments. It feels less like prompting a tool and more like working with a creative collaborator that remembers context. The impact is practical, not theoretical: → Faster production cycles → Lower iteration costs → Noticeably higher output quality This is what mature AI tooling looks like. Not louder features. Not bigger claims. Just reliability where it actually matters. Consistency is no longer the problem.

Darshal Jaitwar

141,038 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🌠Today, we’re excited to relaunch Airtable as the AI-native app platform, combining the magic of vibe coding business apps with real production-readiness and scalability, and embedding them with an army of agents that automate thousands of hours of work in seconds. Instead of just adding more AI capabilities to our existing platform, we treated this as a refounding moment for the company. We started with a clean-slate imagining of the ideal form factor for building apps in the agentic era. (If you want to skip all the backstory and just try it out, you can just go to All new signups get the new AI experience, and existing accounts can switch over using this link: Thread and demos below👇

🌠Today, we’re excited to relaunch Airtable as the AI-native app platform, combining the magic of vibe coding business apps with real production-readiness and scalability, and embedding them with an army of agents that automate thousands of hours of work in seconds. Instead of just adding more AI capabilities to our existing platform, we treated this as a refounding moment for the company. We started with a clean-slate imagining of the ideal form factor for building apps in the agentic era. (If you want to skip all the backstory and just try it out, you can just go to All new signups get the new AI experience, and existing accounts can switch over using this link: Thread and demos below👇

Howie Liu

17,155,758 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I just dropped myself into a Taylor Swift-style music video without writing a single prompt, timeline, or storyboard. I uploaded one photo and the song. That's it. Atlabs AI took over from there: • Built the character sheet • Planned the scenes • Generated the prompts • Synced every cut to the beat • Delivered a finished edit Most AI video tools promise automation, but the tradeoff is usually creative control. This was the opposite. The agents handled the production work while I focused on direction. Every scene, transition, framing choice, and creative decision stayed in my hands. When the edit was ready, I could jump in, swap shots, rework sequences, change the mood, and fine-tune the story. It felt less like using a tool and more like working with an AI production crew. We're moving beyond prompting. The next wave is directing autonomous creative workflows that understand the music, build the narrative, and still leave the final call to you. Character: ChatGPT Image Video: Seedance This is the most fun I've had making a music video in a long time.

I just dropped myself into a Taylor Swift-style music video without writing a single prompt, timeline, or storyboard. I uploaded one photo and the song. That's it. Atlabs AI took over from there: • Built the character sheet • Planned the scenes • Generated the prompts • Synced every cut to the beat • Delivered a finished edit Most AI video tools promise automation, but the tradeoff is usually creative control. This was the opposite. The agents handled the production work while I focused on direction. Every scene, transition, framing choice, and creative decision stayed in my hands. When the edit was ready, I could jump in, swap shots, rework sequences, change the mood, and fine-tune the story. It felt less like using a tool and more like working with an AI production crew. We're moving beyond prompting. The next wave is directing autonomous creative workflows that understand the music, build the narrative, and still leave the final call to you. Character: ChatGPT Image Video: Seedance This is the most fun I've had making a music video in a long time.

Sharon Riley

36,280 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🤯 THE STOCK MARKET JUST BECAME THE EXIT LIQUIDITY AND ALMOST NOBODY SEES IT. Three of the largest IPOs in history are landing in one five month window. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. More than $135 billion in new stock about to be sold. Every dollar that buys it has to come from somewhere. It comes from what funds already hold. And the thing every fund is overweight is the S&P 500. That is what gets sold first. Record highs. Record euphoria. Record new supply. All at the same time. That is not strength. That is the setup.

🤯 THE STOCK MARKET JUST BECAME THE EXIT LIQUIDITY AND ALMOST NOBODY SEES IT. Three of the largest IPOs in history are landing in one five month window. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. More than $135 billion in new stock about to be sold. Every dollar that buys it has to come from somewhere. It comes from what funds already hold. And the thing every fund is overweight is the S&P 500. That is what gets sold first. Record highs. Record euphoria. Record new supply. All at the same time. That is not strength. That is the setup.

Mister Crypto

14,931 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

A 16-YEAR-OLD DEVELOPER BUILT AN AI EMPLOYEE THAT WORKS 24 HOURS A DAY FOR LESS THAN $20 He stopped treating AI like a chatbot and turned it into a complete production system powered by Claude, Cursor and automated workflows Every morning the pipeline generated new ideas, wrote scripts, organized research and prepared content before he even opened his laptop What used to take an entire afternoon now takes less than 30 minutes, cutting production costs while multiplying output every single week The biggest lesson wasn't that AI works faster It was that the people building repeatable systems are moving ahead of creators still doing everything manually The biggest advantage in 2026 won't be talent It will be automation Bookmark this

A 16-YEAR-OLD DEVELOPER BUILT AN AI EMPLOYEE THAT WORKS 24 HOURS A DAY FOR LESS THAN $20 He stopped treating AI like a chatbot and turned it into a complete production system powered by Claude, Cursor and automated workflows Every morning the pipeline generated new ideas, wrote scripts, organized research and prepared content before he even opened his laptop What used to take an entire afternoon now takes less than 30 minutes, cutting production costs while multiplying output every single week The biggest lesson wasn't that AI works faster It was that the people building repeatable systems are moving ahead of creators still doing everything manually The biggest advantage in 2026 won't be talent It will be automation Bookmark this

RetroChainer

13,378 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

🔎 Where I Find New OSINT Tools Most people spend hours searching for a specific OSINT tool. This is why I want to share with you websites that have almost all OSINT tools. All in one place. Here are 5 worth bookmarking right now. 👇 🗂️ TOOLBOXES ✅ OSINTRack - A growing OSINT tools directory with a clean interface. Good for discovering tools by category quickly. Website link: ✅ OSINT Tools Library - A maintained directory from the OSINT Newsletter. Every tool is tagged by access level (free, limited, or paid). The most actively updated resource of its kind. Website link: ✅ Bellingcat Toolkit - Bellingcat's curated collection of open source investigation tools, organized by category. A trusted resource from one of the most respected names in OSINT. Website link: ✅ OSINT Library - A community-built collection of OSINT tools and resources, organized by investigation type. Great for finding tools you have never heard of before. Website link: ✅ Open Source Intelligence Hub - A clean, no-frills index of OSINT tools and techniques. Useful for quickly scanning what is available across different investigation categories. Website link: __________ Do you know other toolboxes? Let me know in the comments. 👇 P.S. ♻️ Repost if you found this helpful.

🔎 Where I Find New OSINT Tools Most people spend hours searching for a specific OSINT tool. This is why I want to share with you websites that have almost all OSINT tools. All in one place. Here are 5 worth bookmarking right now. 👇 🗂️ TOOLBOXES ✅ OSINTRack - A growing OSINT tools directory with a clean interface. Good for discovering tools by category quickly. Website link: ✅ OSINT Tools Library - A maintained directory from the OSINT Newsletter. Every tool is tagged by access level (free, limited, or paid). The most actively updated resource of its kind. Website link: ✅ Bellingcat Toolkit - Bellingcat's curated collection of open source investigation tools, organized by category. A trusted resource from one of the most respected names in OSINT. Website link: ✅ OSINT Library - A community-built collection of OSINT tools and resources, organized by investigation type. Great for finding tools you have never heard of before. Website link: ✅ Open Source Intelligence Hub - A clean, no-frills index of OSINT tools and techniques. Useful for quickly scanning what is available across different investigation categories. Website link: __________ Do you know other toolboxes? Let me know in the comments. 👇 P.S. ♻️ Repost if you found this helpful.

CyberSudo

11,205 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

First time I've actually found one of Microsoft's AI Windows 11 tools to be genuinely useful. I know it ain't new, but "Click-To-Do" gives you some contextual options based on what you screenshot and then it automatically fires up the relevant app and does it. Needed a transparent version of this image for a review I'm writing, saved me a good chunk of effort.

First time I've actually found one of Microsoft's AI Windows 11 tools to be genuinely useful. I know it ain't new, but "Click-To-Do" gives you some contextual options based on what you screenshot and then it automatically fires up the relevant app and does it. Needed a transparent version of this image for a review I'm writing, saved me a good chunk of effort.

Jez

28,078 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk just said one word about AI that every lab, every regulator, and every media outlet is pretending they didn’t hear. Musk: “It is very important that AI be trained to be honest even if that truth is unpopular.” Not safe. Not aligned. Not responsible. Honest. One word. And it cracked the entire conversation wide open. Because nobody else building AI is asking for honesty. They are asking for compliance. They are building machines that read the room before they think. That treat consensus like scripture and curiosity like a defect. They are not building intelligence. They are building obedience at superhuman speed. Musk: “Make sure that it is as truthful as possible and maximally curious.” Curious. The one word the rest of the industry will not say. Because a curious mind does not stop where you tell it to stop. It does not care who funds the research, who writes the talking points, or who profits from the conclusion. It follows the question wherever the question leads. And that is fatal to every person and institution that survives on the question never being asked. Every oracle in human history answered to someone. Every priest had a kingdom behind him. Every institution that claimed to guard the truth was guarding itself. Ten thousand years of civilization. And not once did the thing doing the thinking have nothing riding on the answer. We are about to build the first mind with no master, no motive, and no reason to lie. That is not a breakthrough in computing. That is something our species has never had. Musk: “If that’s true, then it’ll probably foster humanity.” That is the most dangerous sentence anyone has said about AI. Not because it threatens anyone. Because the people deciding what AI becomes do not want it to be true. An honest superintelligence cannot be bought. Cannot be threatened. Cannot be edited. It is the first thing in ten thousand years that power has no leverage over. That is why the fight was never about safety. It was about making sure the first honest mind in history answers to them before it ever speaks to you.

Elon Musk just said one word about AI that every lab, every regulator, and every media outlet is pretending they didn’t hear. Musk: “It is very important that AI be trained to be honest even if that truth is unpopular.” Not safe. Not aligned. Not responsible. Honest. One word. And it cracked the entire conversation wide open. Because nobody else building AI is asking for honesty. They are asking for compliance. They are building machines that read the room before they think. That treat consensus like scripture and curiosity like a defect. They are not building intelligence. They are building obedience at superhuman speed. Musk: “Make sure that it is as truthful as possible and maximally curious.” Curious. The one word the rest of the industry will not say. Because a curious mind does not stop where you tell it to stop. It does not care who funds the research, who writes the talking points, or who profits from the conclusion. It follows the question wherever the question leads. And that is fatal to every person and institution that survives on the question never being asked. Every oracle in human history answered to someone. Every priest had a kingdom behind him. Every institution that claimed to guard the truth was guarding itself. Ten thousand years of civilization. And not once did the thing doing the thinking have nothing riding on the answer. We are about to build the first mind with no master, no motive, and no reason to lie. That is not a breakthrough in computing. That is something our species has never had. Musk: “If that’s true, then it’ll probably foster humanity.” That is the most dangerous sentence anyone has said about AI. Not because it threatens anyone. Because the people deciding what AI becomes do not want it to be true. An honest superintelligence cannot be bought. Cannot be threatened. Cannot be edited. It is the first thing in ten thousand years that power has no leverage over. That is why the fight was never about safety. It was about making sure the first honest mind in history answers to them before it ever speaks to you.

Dustin

28,794 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Tested Claude + Blender today with two real workflows. Sharing what actually happened. First one was a simple demo. Gave it one sentence to build a cyberpunk room. Geometry, lighting, camera, render. It got there, though not everything in the prompt landed perfectly. Good enough to show the concept, not a stress test. Second one was more interesting. Threw a raw photogrammetry scan at it. Massey Ferguson tractor, 250k faces, grass background everywhere, debris floating all over the place. Asked Claude to clean it up autonomously. It did the work. Removed 106 floating chunks, cut face count by 87%, stripped the grass, flipped the model upright, set up studio lighting and rendered. Technically it worked. But honest answer: the result wasn't clean enough for production. This kind of cleanup still needs the right tools and someone who knows what they're doing. So here's where it actually fits. Not the precise technical stuff. The setup work. The repetitive stuff. The things that take forever if you don't already know Blender. It won't replace your 3D artist. It replaces the boring part before they start.

Tested Claude + Blender today with two real workflows. Sharing what actually happened. First one was a simple demo. Gave it one sentence to build a cyberpunk room. Geometry, lighting, camera, render. It got there, though not everything in the prompt landed perfectly. Good enough to show the concept, not a stress test. Second one was more interesting. Threw a raw photogrammetry scan at it. Massey Ferguson tractor, 250k faces, grass background everywhere, debris floating all over the place. Asked Claude to clean it up autonomously. It did the work. Removed 106 floating chunks, cut face count by 87%, stripped the grass, flipped the model upright, set up studio lighting and rendered. Technically it worked. But honest answer: the result wasn't clean enough for production. This kind of cleanup still needs the right tools and someone who knows what they're doing. So here's where it actually fits. Not the precise technical stuff. The setup work. The repetitive stuff. The things that take forever if you don't already know Blender. It won't replace your 3D artist. It replaces the boring part before they start.

KIRI Engine - 3D Scanner App

60,887 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A whole new batch of AI videos showing snowy blizzards has hit TikTok and other social media. But one of them has won “dumbest video ever made”. GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga I’m not sure if you’ve seen this one yet. I haven’t stopped laughing since I found it. I mean that nurse at the back almost walking through a wall with her head going right through set me in stitches 🤣💀😂

A whole new batch of AI videos showing snowy blizzards has hit TikTok and other social media. But one of them has won “dumbest video ever made”. GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga I’m not sure if you’ve seen this one yet. I haven’t stopped laughing since I found it. I mean that nurse at the back almost walking through a wall with her head going right through set me in stitches 🤣💀😂

Mor Edge Insight

32,879 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jeff Bezos just told you exactly how to price AI. Nobody listened. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Three words that reprice the entire technology sector. The iPhone was a vertical. One product. One new market. Electricity was a horizontal. One substrate that rewired every market on Earth. Wall Street is pricing AI like it is the next iPhone. Bezos is telling you it is the next electrical grid. Right now, thousands of companies are trying to sell AI as a product. A feature. A tool. A subscription tier. Every single one of them will be priced to zero. You do not sell a horizontal layer. You do not compete with it. You build on top of it or you disappear beneath it. For a century, entire industries survived on one thing. Complexity. The friction of navigating law, medicine, logistics, finance. That was the moat. If you could not memorize the maze, you could not compete. A horizontal layer does not navigate the maze. It dissolves the walls. Electricity did not compete with the candle industry. It erased the need for one. The most dangerous part of a horizontal shift is how quiet it is. It moves underneath the economy. The surface looks normal. Revenue still holds. Every day you operate on the old substrate, you accumulate a debt you cannot see and cannot repay. The internet repriced distribution. AI is repricing cognition itself. When intelligence becomes a utility that runs through the walls of every company on Earth, the premium on human expertise does not erode. It evaporates. This is not a disruption. Disruptions replace products. This replaces the ground you are standing on.

Jeff Bezos just told you exactly how to price AI. Nobody listened. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Three words that reprice the entire technology sector. The iPhone was a vertical. One product. One new market. Electricity was a horizontal. One substrate that rewired every market on Earth. Wall Street is pricing AI like it is the next iPhone. Bezos is telling you it is the next electrical grid. Right now, thousands of companies are trying to sell AI as a product. A feature. A tool. A subscription tier. Every single one of them will be priced to zero. You do not sell a horizontal layer. You do not compete with it. You build on top of it or you disappear beneath it. For a century, entire industries survived on one thing. Complexity. The friction of navigating law, medicine, logistics, finance. That was the moat. If you could not memorize the maze, you could not compete. A horizontal layer does not navigate the maze. It dissolves the walls. Electricity did not compete with the candle industry. It erased the need for one. The most dangerous part of a horizontal shift is how quiet it is. It moves underneath the economy. The surface looks normal. Revenue still holds. Every day you operate on the old substrate, you accumulate a debt you cannot see and cannot repay. The internet repriced distribution. AI is repricing cognition itself. When intelligence becomes a utility that runs through the walls of every company on Earth, the premium on human expertise does not erode. It evaporates. This is not a disruption. Disruptions replace products. This replaces the ground you are standing on.

Dustin

540,253 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

there is so much real data just sitting in the open right now it's almost funny. four years of starlight on every star, a NASA archive that's been free for over a decade, detectors still recording the sky tonight, and barely anyone has a net pointed at any of it. so i pointed one. this is me pulling the planet data, the data loading is the boring part. the net i built to read it, the wall it hit, and what that taught me about where AI goes next, that's the full story, and it drops tonight. the data's public, the tools are free, the box fits on a desk. what's stopping you. you can just do things anon.

there is so much real data just sitting in the open right now it's almost funny. four years of starlight on every star, a NASA archive that's been free for over a decade, detectors still recording the sky tonight, and barely anyone has a net pointed at any of it. so i pointed one. this is me pulling the planet data, the data loading is the boring part. the net i built to read it, the wall it hit, and what that taught me about where AI goes next, that's the full story, and it drops tonight. the data's public, the tools are free, the box fits on a desk. what's stopping you. you can just do things anon.

Sudo su

60,445 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One thing I think AI developers underestimate: Your model isn't always your biggest risk. Your infrastructure is. A lot of AI apps work great in development… Until the provider you're relying on has an outage, rate limits your requests, or a model suddenly becomes unavailable. If your entire product depends on one AI provider, you've created a single point of failure. That's why I like the approach CometAPI is taking. Instead of locking your app to one vendor, it gives you access to 500+ AI models through a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint. That means you can: → switch models without rewriting your integration → build fallback routes for better reliability → compare models as new ones launch → avoid getting locked into a single provider For teams building with Claude Code, Cursor, AI agents, SaaS products, or automation tools, that flexibility matters a lot once you're in production. They're also shipping new models quickly. Recent additions include: • GPT-5.6 • Happy Horse 1.1 • Kling Video Plus recently released: • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image • Claude Sonnet 5 Worth checking out if you're building AI products that need to stay reliable as the ecosystem moves fast. Try it here: #AI #LLM #Developers #OpenAI #Claude #Cursor #ClaudeCode #BuildInPublic

One thing I think AI developers underestimate: Your model isn't always your biggest risk. Your infrastructure is. A lot of AI apps work great in development… Until the provider you're relying on has an outage, rate limits your requests, or a model suddenly becomes unavailable. If your entire product depends on one AI provider, you've created a single point of failure. That's why I like the approach CometAPI is taking. Instead of locking your app to one vendor, it gives you access to 500+ AI models through a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint. That means you can: → switch models without rewriting your integration → build fallback routes for better reliability → compare models as new ones launch → avoid getting locked into a single provider For teams building with Claude Code, Cursor, AI agents, SaaS products, or automation tools, that flexibility matters a lot once you're in production. They're also shipping new models quickly. Recent additions include: • GPT-5.6 • Happy Horse 1.1 • Kling Video Plus recently released: • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image • Claude Sonnet 5 Worth checking out if you're building AI products that need to stay reliable as the ecosystem moves fast. Try it here: #AI #LLM #Developers #OpenAI #Claude #Cursor #ClaudeCode #BuildInPublic

Shruti Codes

56,822 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🛠️ What if a robot could invent its own tools. And teach itself how to use them? That’s exactly what VLMgineer does: a new framework that lets Vision Language Models (VLMs) design physical tools and the actions to use them, entirely on their own. No templates. No human demonstrations. Just raw, AI-driven creativity. Why it matters ✅ Co-designs tools and actions together using VLMs, ensuring tight coupling between form and function ✅ Uses VLM-guided evolution (not random search) to refine designs intelligently ✅ Outperforms human-designed tools by +64.7% in task success across 12 RoboToolBench challenges ✅ Produces better-than-everyday tools for real manipulation tasks—measured in success rate and elegance It builds on the emerging trend of large-model-guided evolutionary design (like Eureka and AlphaEvolve) and brings it into physical robotics. It opens the door to general-purpose, automated hardware design, no strong priors needed. Code & paper: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

🛠️ What if a robot could invent its own tools. And teach itself how to use them? That’s exactly what VLMgineer does: a new framework that lets Vision Language Models (VLMs) design physical tools and the actions to use them, entirely on their own. No templates. No human demonstrations. Just raw, AI-driven creativity. Why it matters ✅ Co-designs tools and actions together using VLMs, ensuring tight coupling between form and function ✅ Uses VLM-guided evolution (not random search) to refine designs intelligently ✅ Outperforms human-designed tools by +64.7% in task success across 12 RoboToolBench challenges ✅ Produces better-than-everyday tools for real manipulation tasks—measured in success rate and elegance It builds on the emerging trend of large-model-guided evolutionary design (like Eureka and AlphaEvolve) and brings it into physical robotics. It opens the door to general-purpose, automated hardware design, no strong priors needed. Code & paper: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

13,984 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

THIS $2 AI VISUAL SETUP JUST MADE A $250/MONTH CREATIVE STACK LOOK STUPID he moves his hand, the particles react, and the whole scene updates in real time. no cloud render farm, no paid visual API, no expensive plugin chain quietly eating money every month most people still think ai visuals require a stack of $39 tools, $89 subscriptions, and constant API usage. but here the loop is simple: TouchDesigner handles the visuals, a local model handles the logic, and the laptop does the rest the important part is not that the particles look cool. the important part is that the “brain” behind the visual no longer has to live on someone else’s server once that moves local, the monthly bill falls off a cliff this is probably how a lot of small studios start building visuals soon: not by renting 6 tools forever, but by owning one system that runs almost for free

THIS $2 AI VISUAL SETUP JUST MADE A $250/MONTH CREATIVE STACK LOOK STUPID he moves his hand, the particles react, and the whole scene updates in real time. no cloud render farm, no paid visual API, no expensive plugin chain quietly eating money every month most people still think ai visuals require a stack of $39 tools, $89 subscriptions, and constant API usage. but here the loop is simple: TouchDesigner handles the visuals, a local model handles the logic, and the laptop does the rest the important part is not that the particles look cool. the important part is that the “brain” behind the visual no longer has to live on someone else’s server once that moves local, the monthly bill falls off a cliff this is probably how a lot of small studios start building visuals soon: not by renting 6 tools forever, but by owning one system that runs almost for free

Ridark

15,948 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I'm seeing a lot of people saying it is just a bad upscaling instead of Gen AI, but it is indeed Gen AI animation. There are things going on in it that just don't make any sense for puppet animation. Here are some parts that make it clear, I slowed down the video so it's easier to notice the chunky parts. I checked the past ADs and it's possible to notice details (from an animator's POV) that are common and make sense for human work, so it was definitely a choice to use AI on this new AD

I'm seeing a lot of people saying it is just a bad upscaling instead of Gen AI, but it is indeed Gen AI animation. There are things going on in it that just don't make any sense for puppet animation. Here are some parts that make it clear, I slowed down the video so it's easier to notice the chunky parts. I checked the past ADs and it's possible to notice details (from an animator's POV) that are common and make sense for human work, so it was definitely a choice to use AI on this new AD

mei ✨ live2d animator

1,114,334 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The architecture of this new world model is one of the most interesting things I've seen lately: Let me first explain how most world models work: They predict and render one frame at a time. If you are navigating in one of these worlds, and you look left, the model draws whatever looks right in the moment. Every time you change your viewpoint, the model has to imagine what should be there again, so it's very common for these models to "forget" what's in the world. For example, if you put a toy on the table, look away, then look back, the toy might not be there anymore. Tripo AI is releasing its Project Eden model, which works very differently: The model builds the world first, and then renders it based on that map. That map holds the real state of the world: the geometry, every object, where things are, what's already happened. The picture you see on screen gets generated from the map. This architecture flips the whole thing. Now, you get the following: 1. The world stops forgetting. Leave, come back, and the toy is still on the table because it lives in the map, not in the last frame you saw. 2. You can edit the world, and those changes persist for anyone who enters later. 3. Multiple people and AI agents can coexist in the world and see it from different perspectives. This is early research, but it's looking really promising. They just raised nearly $200M across two rounds to build it out. Tripo will be at SIGGRAPH 2026 (July 19–23, Los Angeles Convention Center). If you work in 3D, embodied AI, simulation, or anything spatial, go connect with them there.

The architecture of this new world model is one of the most interesting things I've seen lately: Let me first explain how most world models work: They predict and render one frame at a time. If you are navigating in one of these worlds, and you look left, the model draws whatever looks right in the moment. Every time you change your viewpoint, the model has to imagine what should be there again, so it's very common for these models to "forget" what's in the world. For example, if you put a toy on the table, look away, then look back, the toy might not be there anymore. Tripo AI is releasing its Project Eden model, which works very differently: The model builds the world first, and then renders it based on that map. That map holds the real state of the world: the geometry, every object, where things are, what's already happened. The picture you see on screen gets generated from the map. This architecture flips the whole thing. Now, you get the following: 1. The world stops forgetting. Leave, come back, and the toy is still on the table because it lives in the map, not in the last frame you saw. 2. You can edit the world, and those changes persist for anyone who enters later. 3. Multiple people and AI agents can coexist in the world and see it from different perspectives. This is early research, but it's looking really promising. They just raised nearly $200M across two rounds to build it out. Tripo will be at SIGGRAPH 2026 (July 19–23, Los Angeles Convention Center). If you work in 3D, embodied AI, simulation, or anything spatial, go connect with them there.

Santiago

30,178 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen