Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Built ./Phone: A Mobile Phone Forensic Framework Feature: - Dump Call Logs - Dump SMS - Dump Photos / Videos / Documents - Extract information from documents I.e emails, passwords, phone numbers e.t.c Nana Sei Anyemedu

106,947 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Sudo Undeesputed
Sudo Undeesputed1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Nice one bro

Фото профиля DERDACK
DERDACK3 лет назад

Reliable Mobile Alerting and Anywhere Incident Management. Mobile App, Text, Voicecall Alerts with Escalations and Duty Scheduling. 30-Days Free Trial.

Фото профиля Samuel Ogbonna
Samuel Ogbonna1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Keep up the good work my boss 👍

Фото профиля Adanna
Adanna1 год назад

@RedHatPentester 🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля Martin L. O'Shield
Martin L. O'Shield1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Are you going to release it ?

Фото профиля ZoeCyber
ZoeCyber1 год назад

@RedHatPentester 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля Dr.flowz
Dr.flowz1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Good job bro

Фото профиля LRD⚡️
LRD⚡️1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Nice one

Фото профиля Okafor Stephen
Okafor Stephen1 год назад

@RedHatPentester 👏🏽

Фото профиля 🔝0.01% Naval tweets Reader
🔝0.01% Naval tweets Reader1 год назад

@RedHatPentester Sickkkkk

Фото профиля ergoproxy
ergoproxy1 год назад

@RedHatPentester I love the tool name

Похожие видео

Julie and Chris Albert did not simply hand their phones to MSP and say, “Search everything.” There was no full Cellebrite extraction, no complete download, no apparent recovery of deleted messages, and no broad review of calls, apps, photos, emails, contacts, or communications with everyone connected to the case. This was an extremely narrow, consensual search focused almost entirely on phone numbers MSP already believed belonged to Michael Proctor. MARCH 18, 2024 During Julie’s first interview, investigators asked about communications with Proctor and requested permission to look through her phone. But MSP immediately reassured her “We’re not looking to dump your phone.” They explained that a dump would extract everything, and that was not what they wanted. They were seeking only direct Proctor communications, group threads involving Proctor, and specific messages referenced in court. Julie still did not consent. “I’m just not going to make this decision right now.” She wanted to speak with Chris first. A few hours later, after leaving MSP with the phone, Julie called back and said she had found Proctor saved as “Mike Proctor,” along with one incoming message and one response. To her credit, she reported it. But she had been alone with the phone before investigators documented those messages, and she still had not authorized them to conduct their own search. MARCH 19, 2024 Julie returned and allowed MSP to view and photograph the Proctor contact and two messages she had personally found. That is not the same as consenting to an independent search. When asked again, Julie said “I have, but I haven’t figured that out with my husband just yet.” So MSP could document what Julie placed in front of them, but could not independently search the device themselves. The delays continued. Julie wanted more time, investigators and Julie played phone tag, she became ill, and scheduling carried into the following week. Julie did not sign the consent form until April 3....16 days after her first interview. Even then, the search remained extremely limited. Julie stayed in the room while an investigator manually entered several known Proctor phone numbers into the iPhone’s ordinary search function. No forensic extraction. No deleted-message recovery. They found one incoming message from Proctor’s number ending in 2093, Julie’s response, and nothing associated with four other known numbers. That tells us only what appeared through those particular manual searches on April 3. It does not establish whether deleted messages once existed, whether calls occurred instead of texts, whether another number or app was used, whether communications existed on an earlier phone or cloud backup, or whether Apple IDs, emails, aliases, or unidentified numbers were involved. In fact, during Julie’s second interview, her own phone displayed a notice that additional results would appear after Messages finished indexing. This was not a forensic examination of Julie Albert’s phone. It was a carefully restricted search of selected numbers, conducted only after more than two weeks of hesitation.

Dixie Normus

38,597 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Cops who use personal phones for investigations have no legal right to expect their "private" texts to stay hidden when a judge orders a phone dump. Privacy vanishes when you make your personal device an instrument of the state. Supporters screaming about privacy are ignoring the law. You don't get to use your phone for state business and expect a bubble of immunity. Canton’s "penny-wise, pound-foolish" policy was trying to save a logistically small amount of money, or simply bending to what was convenient for the officers during collective bargaining, which then led to the town creating a massive liability. When an officer uses a personal phone to conduct police business, talking to informants, interviewing witnesses, or filming Gallagher using the leaf blower, that phone legally ceases to be purely private. If an officer texts a witness about a case from a personal phone, the defense has a right to see those texts during legal discovery. Once a judge signs off on extracting data from that phone for case-related evidence, everything on it is fair game. If that phone contains racist, hateful, or highly inappropriate personal texts, even to a friend,they will be exposed. Those texts can then be used to destroy the officer's credibility on the witness stand, potentially tanking perfectly valid criminal prosecutions. The argument that a town is "financially constrained" from buying phones is a myth. Enterprise government data plans are notoriously cheap. The $45,000 the town allocates to hand out as stipends could easily fund a dedicated fleet of managed, secure department devices. When police unions bargain for stipends instead of department equipment, it’s often framed as a "convenience perk" for the officers so they don't have to carry two devices. However, the lack of boundaries ultimately harms the everyday officers. It sets them up for a crisis where their entire personal life, photos, private jokes, bank info, and location data, is exposed to the court system because they used their personal device to take a quick video at a crime scene. A department-issued phone policy protects everyone. It protects the town's liability, it secures criminal evidence, and it keeps an officer's private life completely walled off from public record. Crossing those streams is a breakdown of basic professional standards.

Dixie Normus

18,945 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This info about META will BLOW YOUR MIND American “I worked in IT for like 13 years” “I learned a lot about data privacy — and social media and what apps are notoriously bad when it comes to data privacy. At the very top of the list, the worst offender, the worst app for data privacy is Facebook Messenger” “Let me just explain this to you. If you have Messenger on your phone and you don't have any other apps by Meta, you don't have Facebook, Instagram, threads, nothing. If the only thing from Meta you have on your phone is Messenger and you connect to a WiFi, Messenger makes a map of that Wi-Fi network. - It collects information about every single device that is connected to that network - So every phone, every computer, every tablet, every printer, every camera, every thermostat, every smart TV, every Roku device, and on every single one of those devices - They're collecting the name of the device, the IP address of the device, what type of device it is, whether or not your device has access to that device And this doesn't just happen on your home network, it happens on every Wi-Fi network you connect to. —- And it's a lot more information than just, oh, there's 200 devices connected to this network. No, it's detailed information about every single device. Like, here's a mobile device connected - it's an iPhone - It's titled Jeremy's iPhone - It's running iOS version blank blank - Its IP address is blank blank blank blank - Its MAC address or its hardware ID is blank blank blank But they also collect a crap ton of information from your actual phone. Like - The names, phone numbers, email addresses, and social links of literally everyone in your contacts. - Your location history - Your browsing history. - A detailed list of every single app that you've ever installed - YOUR PASSWORDS - YOUR FINGERPRINTS - YOUR FACE ID Spoiler alert, it's not. Downloading Messenger means that you consent to their terms of service. You give consent just by downloading the Messenger app. Using the service and downloading the app gives consent. Consent for your phone to be used as a data collection device. To collect data about every place you go and every person you're in contact with. — Messenger is easily the worst one”

Wall Street Apes

215,676 просмотров • 1 год назад

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

On 1/24/24, Det. Lt. Brian Tully and Lt. John Fanning of the Massachusetts State Police seized two cell phones from Karen Read. Except… when they attempted to check the phones, at least one appeared to be brand new or factory reset. 💀 Newly released body-worn camera footage (via LTL Media) shows exactly how this unfolded and it’s not favorable to the Commonwealth. Tully first attempts to call the phone he seized which goes straight to voicemail. Fanning then suggests trying the phone he seized. When Tully calls it, Fanning holds the device up. On camera we see the Apple “Hello” setup screen appear. 😂 That screen is standard for new or fully factory-reset iPhones. This detail matters as it helps explain why the grand jury may have declined to indict Karen Read on witness-intimidation charges. There was simply no recoverable digital evidence to support the allegation. We also know the Norfolk County DA’s Office never attempted a Cellebrite extraction on either phone. On modern iPhones, a completed factory reset destroys encryption keys. ➡️ User data is unrecoverable: no texts, no photos, no call logs, no app data. For those that may claim a pre-seizure reset is “illegal”... 💥news flash💥 - it’s not. At that point, there was: 🔹 No forensic preservation order 🔹 No explicit instruction not to reset 🔹 No warrant yet executed If a reset is completed before seizure, investigators inherit the phone as-is. Prosecutors would have to prove intent to destroy evidence, and that’s something they have never alleged, charged, or proven since January 2024. Is this why no extraction was ever attempted? By not running Cellebrite, the Commonwealth avoids generating a report that would confirm the reset timing, the lack of recoverable data and the futility of the seizure. Instead, they retain the phones, preserving ambiguity. 🙄 At this point, holding onto those devices looks less like evidence handling and more like control. And ambiguity, apparently, is the last leverage they have left. “Good luck… you’re going to need it.”

BoozeyBeauty

65,805 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Last year, during tax season. I had 50+ receipts. Some in my email. Some on WhatsApp. Some in my gallery. And a few, I couldn’t even remember where I saved them. What should’ve taken a few hours turned into late nights, frustration, and second-guessing everything. Because the real problem isn’t filing taxes. It’s this: → Collecting documents → Organizing them → Verifying if everything is correct That’s where most people struggle. This year, I tried something different. Instead of chasing files everywhere, I built a simple, clean system using Wondershare PDFelement. And honestly, it changed everything. Here’s how my workflow looked. I started by scanning all my paper receipts directly from my phone using the Receipt Assistant. No manual typing. No guesswork. It automatically extracted details like: • Merchant • Date • Amount • Taxes Everything turned into searchable PDFs instantly. Then came the best part. All files were automatically saved to the cloud. So, I could: → Scan on mobile → Manage on desktop → Access everything, anytime No more “where did I save that?” moments. But what impressed me most. Every extracted detail is traceable. I could click any number and instantly jump back to the exact spot in the original receipt. No more cross-checking line by line. And when it was time to organize everything. • Exported all data into Excel → full expense overview • Merged multiple files into one clean PDF • Edited tax documents directly (no extra tools needed) Before final submission, I used: • AI Assistant → to summarize & cross-check documents • Smart Redact → to hide sensitive information Everything felt controlled, clean, and secure. That’s when it hit me: A good tax system isn’t about working harder. It’s about having a clear, traceable workflow that removes chaos. Suppose your files are still scattered across folders, emails, and screenshots. That is exactly why tax season feels exhausting. Search Wondershare PDFelement and try it free → #wondersharepdfelement #pdfelement #FileWithPDFelement #TaxSeason

Vikas Singh

11,795 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад