Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Built ./Phone: A Mobile Phone Forensic Framework Feature: - Dump Call Logs - Dump SMS - Dump Photos / Videos / Documents - Extract information from documents I.e emails, passwords, phone numbers e.t.c Nana Sei Anyemedu

107,010 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sudo Undeesputed
Sudo Undeesputedvor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Nice one bro

Profilbild von DERDACK
DERDACKvor 3 Jahren

Reliable Mobile Alerting and Anywhere Incident Management. Mobile App, Text, Voicecall Alerts with Escalations and Duty Scheduling. 30-Days Free Trial.

Profilbild von Samuel Ogbonna
Samuel Ogbonnavor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Keep up the good work my boss 👍

Profilbild von Adanna
Adannavor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester 🔥🔥🔥

Profilbild von Martin L. O'Shield
Martin L. O'Shieldvor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Are you going to release it ?

Profilbild von ZoeCyber
ZoeCybervor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Profilbild von Dr.flowz
Dr.flowzvor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Good job bro

Profilbild von LRD⚡️
LRD⚡️vor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Nice one

Profilbild von Okafor Stephen
Okafor Stephenvor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester 👏🏽

Profilbild von 🔝0.01% Naval tweets Reader
🔝0.01% Naval tweets Readervor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester Sickkkkk

Profilbild von ergoproxy
ergoproxyvor 1 Jahr

@RedHatPentester I love the tool name

Ähnliche Videos

I find it fascinating that the attorneys representing the HAM plaintiffs, and their online cohorts, are bringing up the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL) when discussing phone evidence. Because one of the HAMs themselves, Brian Higgins, actually used that resource for his own phone. On January 30th, 2022, Higgins called his "best friend" ATF Agent Matt Kelch, who Higgins described as being good with the "phone stuff." He asked Kelch how he could "pull text strings off (his) phone" so he could provide them to state police. For timeline-wise, this phone call occurred one day after the death of John O'Keefe. Kelch walked him through it, and Higgins went to the FBI RCFL facility and used a kiosk on the first floor to extract selected information from his phone. Flash forward to September 22nd, 2022 when Karen Read's defense team publicly sought an order requiring Higgins to preserve his phone for forensic examination. Six days later, with the preservation order about to be served, Higgins got a new phone and changed his number. The next day, September 30th, he is officially served. Higgins was eventually interviewed by federal prosecutors in May of 2023 and discussed what he had done with the phone. During this portion of trial testimony, it is revealed that Higgins had removed the "cut or broken" SIM card from his original phone, possibly destroyed that same phone and threw away the two items at two different dumpsters on a military base. It was also testified to that he was eventually placed on desk duty, but the public record doesn't establish why. Could his use of a federal forensic resource in the RCFL building to extract information from his personal phone have played a role? I don't know. But considering Higgins' lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney includes claims involving his employment and professional reputation, discovery could potentially shed light on why he was placed on leave/desk duty, what his supervisors knew about the phone, and whether those events were connected. Maybe future filings will finally answer that question. 🫠

BoozeyBeauty

35,983 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Julie and Chris Albert did not simply hand their phones to MSP and say, “Search everything.” There was no full Cellebrite extraction, no complete download, no apparent recovery of deleted messages, and no broad review of calls, apps, photos, emails, contacts, or communications with everyone connected to the case. This was an extremely narrow, consensual search focused almost entirely on phone numbers MSP already believed belonged to Michael Proctor. MARCH 18, 2024 During Julie’s first interview, investigators asked about communications with Proctor and requested permission to look through her phone. But MSP immediately reassured her “We’re not looking to dump your phone.” They explained that a dump would extract everything, and that was not what they wanted. They were seeking only direct Proctor communications, group threads involving Proctor, and specific messages referenced in court. Julie still did not consent. “I’m just not going to make this decision right now.” She wanted to speak with Chris first. A few hours later, after leaving MSP with the phone, Julie called back and said she had found Proctor saved as “Mike Proctor,” along with one incoming message and one response. To her credit, she reported it. But she had been alone with the phone before investigators documented those messages, and she still had not authorized them to conduct their own search. MARCH 19, 2024 Julie returned and allowed MSP to view and photograph the Proctor contact and two messages she had personally found. That is not the same as consenting to an independent search. When asked again, Julie said “I have, but I haven’t figured that out with my husband just yet.” So MSP could document what Julie placed in front of them, but could not independently search the device themselves. The delays continued. Julie wanted more time, investigators and Julie played phone tag, she became ill, and scheduling carried into the following week. Julie did not sign the consent form until April 3....16 days after her first interview. Even then, the search remained extremely limited. Julie stayed in the room while an investigator manually entered several known Proctor phone numbers into the iPhone’s ordinary search function. No forensic extraction. No deleted-message recovery. They found one incoming message from Proctor’s number ending in 2093, Julie’s response, and nothing associated with four other known numbers. That tells us only what appeared through those particular manual searches on April 3. It does not establish whether deleted messages once existed, whether calls occurred instead of texts, whether another number or app was used, whether communications existed on an earlier phone or cloud backup, or whether Apple IDs, emails, aliases, or unidentified numbers were involved. In fact, during Julie’s second interview, her own phone displayed a notice that additional results would appear after Messages finished indexing. This was not a forensic examination of Julie Albert’s phone. It was a carefully restricted search of selected numbers, conducted only after more than two weeks of hesitation.

Dixie Normus

40,060 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’ve been following the evolution of foldables for a while, and what I find interesting is that the category is finally moving beyond the question of “How many screens can we fit into a phone?” The new HUAWEI Mate XT 2 ULTIMATE DESIGN caught my attention for a different reason, Huawei seems to be asking what a foldable phone should actually feel like in everyday life. The feature that stood out most to me is the new folding architecture. Instead of simply improving the previous design, Huawei has changed the way the device folds altogether. The two sides fold inward, fully enclosing the flexible display, while an independent outer screen lets you use the phone normally when it’s closed. That feels like a meaningful design decision to me. A foldable is only truly useful if you don’t have to think about the folding mechanism every time you use it. For calls, messages or quick tasks, it behaves like a phone. When you need more space, you open it up and suddenly have a much larger canvas. The other feature I found genuinely interesting is Lingdun Privacy Display. With increasingly work from our phones, emails, financial information, business documents, conversations. The idea of having hardware-level privacy that can help shield the screen from people looking from the side feels surprisingly practical. And perhaps that’s what I like most about this generation. The impressive part isn’t simply that it looks futuristic, it’s that some of the engineering appears to be focused on solving very ordinary problems: How do I use a large screen without carrying a tablet? How do I protect what I’m looking at in public? How do I make a sophisticated device feel natural? That, to me, is where technology becomes interesting when innovation stops being about showing what’s possible and starts making everyday life a little easier.

Alvin Foo

49,100 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Cops who use personal phones for investigations have no legal right to expect their "private" texts to stay hidden when a judge orders a phone dump. Privacy vanishes when you make your personal device an instrument of the state. Supporters screaming about privacy are ignoring the law. You don't get to use your phone for state business and expect a bubble of immunity. Canton’s "penny-wise, pound-foolish" policy was trying to save a logistically small amount of money, or simply bending to what was convenient for the officers during collective bargaining, which then led to the town creating a massive liability. When an officer uses a personal phone to conduct police business, talking to informants, interviewing witnesses, or filming Gallagher using the leaf blower, that phone legally ceases to be purely private. If an officer texts a witness about a case from a personal phone, the defense has a right to see those texts during legal discovery. Once a judge signs off on extracting data from that phone for case-related evidence, everything on it is fair game. If that phone contains racist, hateful, or highly inappropriate personal texts, even to a friend,they will be exposed. Those texts can then be used to destroy the officer's credibility on the witness stand, potentially tanking perfectly valid criminal prosecutions. The argument that a town is "financially constrained" from buying phones is a myth. Enterprise government data plans are notoriously cheap. The $45,000 the town allocates to hand out as stipends could easily fund a dedicated fleet of managed, secure department devices. When police unions bargain for stipends instead of department equipment, it’s often framed as a "convenience perk" for the officers so they don't have to carry two devices. However, the lack of boundaries ultimately harms the everyday officers. It sets them up for a crisis where their entire personal life, photos, private jokes, bank info, and location data, is exposed to the court system because they used their personal device to take a quick video at a crime scene. A department-issued phone policy protects everyone. It protects the town's liability, it secures criminal evidence, and it keeps an officer's private life completely walled off from public record. Crossing those streams is a breakdown of basic professional standards.

Dixie Normus

18,945 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This info about META will BLOW YOUR MIND American “I worked in IT for like 13 years” “I learned a lot about data privacy — and social media and what apps are notoriously bad when it comes to data privacy. At the very top of the list, the worst offender, the worst app for data privacy is Facebook Messenger” “Let me just explain this to you. If you have Messenger on your phone and you don't have any other apps by Meta, you don't have Facebook, Instagram, threads, nothing. If the only thing from Meta you have on your phone is Messenger and you connect to a WiFi, Messenger makes a map of that Wi-Fi network. - It collects information about every single device that is connected to that network - So every phone, every computer, every tablet, every printer, every camera, every thermostat, every smart TV, every Roku device, and on every single one of those devices - They're collecting the name of the device, the IP address of the device, what type of device it is, whether or not your device has access to that device And this doesn't just happen on your home network, it happens on every Wi-Fi network you connect to. —- And it's a lot more information than just, oh, there's 200 devices connected to this network. No, it's detailed information about every single device. Like, here's a mobile device connected - it's an iPhone - It's titled Jeremy's iPhone - It's running iOS version blank blank - Its IP address is blank blank blank blank - Its MAC address or its hardware ID is blank blank blank But they also collect a crap ton of information from your actual phone. Like - The names, phone numbers, email addresses, and social links of literally everyone in your contacts. - Your location history - Your browsing history. - A detailed list of every single app that you've ever installed - YOUR PASSWORDS - YOUR FINGERPRINTS - YOUR FACE ID Spoiler alert, it's not. Downloading Messenger means that you consent to their terms of service. You give consent just by downloading the Messenger app. Using the service and downloading the app gives consent. Consent for your phone to be used as a data collection device. To collect data about every place you go and every person you're in contact with. — Messenger is easily the worst one”

Wall Street Apes

215,676 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,191 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten