Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Bully lieutenant gets his ego hurt decided to get physical earned himself a suspension. Daniel Kakosa was peacefully filming inside the publicly accessible parking lot of the New London Police Department in Connecticut. He was greeted by Lieutenant Joshua Bergeson and immediately started harassing Kakosa. When Kakosa exercised his... right to remain silent and declined to answer questions or identify himself, officers escalated the consensual encounter. Lieutenant Joshua Bergeson began improperly labeling the public department lot as "private property" and ordering him to disperse under the threat of disorderly conduct and criminal trespass charges. When Kakosa stood his ground and asserted his right to record in open public view, Lt. Bergeson used physical contact—repeatedly body-checking and pushing him to force him off the property before warning him he would be arrested if he touched any vehicles. Kakosa refused to back down and when he was ready he walked into the station lobby to request official complaint forms and initiate a formal internal affairs grievance against the officers involved. Following an internal affairs investigation, the New London Police Department determined that Lt. Bergeson violated multiple departmental standards, including: Respect and courtesy policies Conduct unbecoming of an officer. Use of force reporting protocols Lt. Bergeson was handed an 8-day suspension without pay across two separate complaints and ordered to complete designated retraining. While a referral to the New London County State’s Attorney’s Office via the Connecticut State Police ultimately concluded no state criminal statutes were breached, the departmental discipline sent a clear message regarding improper street-level intimidation. The incident brought renewed attention to Bergeson’s disciplinary history, which includes a 2013 termination over an alleged beating and pepper-spraying incident (later settled through union arbitration) and a 2016 excessive force complaint involving a college student. Despite those prior incidents, Bergeson had risen to lieutenant and served as the local police union president. Knowing your rights during public audits is critical—and holding authority accountable on camera remains one of the most effective tools for institutional oversight. Great job by this man for helping expose another tyrant.show more

Giggling Ganon

263,282 subscribers

16,878 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Unhinged detective completely loses his composure all on camera over two men that stand up to his bully style tactics. Detective Sergeant Greg Morabito of the Utica Police Department in Michigan responded to a call at a gas station parking lot after a driver reported being recorded by some independent journalists. What happened next became a textbook example of how not to handle public interactions—and the entire confrontation was caught in 4k. Morabito pulled up in an unmarked SUV and attempted to question the men recording in public. Exercising their rights, the journalists immediately shut him down, reminding him that they were under no legal obligation to answer questions without reasonable suspicion of a crime, and advised him to go speak to the reporting party instead. Morabito refused to disengage, insisting they were going to answer his questions. The situation quickly degraded into an intense argument over police policy, tax-funded property, and constitutional rights. During the exchange, Morabito became more and more unhinged as he saw that he was not going to be successfully in steam rolling the rights of these men. He eventually got so lost in his anger that he flipped off the men, yelled, and eventually swatted the camera out of Jones’s hand as officers on the scene repeatedly tried to pull Morabito back and de-escalate their supervisor. After officers left the scene, the journalists went directly to the Utica Police Department station to file a formal misconduct complaint against Morabito. Instead of a complaint process, Morabito gave them "two minutes" to leave before arresting and handcuffing Jones for disorderly conduct. Once the footage was released, Morabito was placed on administrative leave while the department launched an internal review. The Macomb County Sheriff's Office conducted an independent investigation into the officer's actions. While prosecutors ultimately declined to press criminal charges against Morabito, the internal pressure and public outcry led to his official resignation from the Utica Police Department. Public service requires accountability, transparency, and a cool head under pressure. This detective displayed none of this. It's scary to think how many folks this man. Most likely violated the rights of over the years and got away with it.

Unhinged detective completely loses his composure all on camera over two men that stand up to his bully style tactics. Detective Sergeant Greg Morabito of the Utica Police Department in Michigan responded to a call at a gas station parking lot after a driver reported being recorded by some independent journalists. What happened next became a textbook example of how not to handle public interactions—and the entire confrontation was caught in 4k. Morabito pulled up in an unmarked SUV and attempted to question the men recording in public. Exercising their rights, the journalists immediately shut him down, reminding him that they were under no legal obligation to answer questions without reasonable suspicion of a crime, and advised him to go speak to the reporting party instead. Morabito refused to disengage, insisting they were going to answer his questions. The situation quickly degraded into an intense argument over police policy, tax-funded property, and constitutional rights. During the exchange, Morabito became more and more unhinged as he saw that he was not going to be successfully in steam rolling the rights of these men. He eventually got so lost in his anger that he flipped off the men, yelled, and eventually swatted the camera out of Jones’s hand as officers on the scene repeatedly tried to pull Morabito back and de-escalate their supervisor. After officers left the scene, the journalists went directly to the Utica Police Department station to file a formal misconduct complaint against Morabito. Instead of a complaint process, Morabito gave them "two minutes" to leave before arresting and handcuffing Jones for disorderly conduct. Once the footage was released, Morabito was placed on administrative leave while the department launched an internal review. The Macomb County Sheriff's Office conducted an independent investigation into the officer's actions. While prosecutors ultimately declined to press criminal charges against Morabito, the internal pressure and public outcry led to his official resignation from the Utica Police Department. Public service requires accountability, transparency, and a cool head under pressure. This detective displayed none of this. It's scary to think how many folks this man. Most likely violated the rights of over the years and got away with it.

Giggling Gannon

119,250 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Gannon

110,729 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Man gets arrested for demanding to speak with chief of police in police lobby. Who was wrong in this situation? Christopher Young walked into the Springboro Police Department lobby demanding to speak directly with the Chief of Police. Young was furious over a traffic citation he had received the previous day for not wearing a seatbelt—a ticket he adamantly claimed was based on a lie by the citing officer. When department staff informed him the chief was unavailable and asked him to calm down or leave, Young refused, repeatedly demanding to see leadership. The tension escalated rapidly when an officer ordered Young to take his hands out of his pockets. Young refused and began backing away. Believing Young was non-compliant and trespassing, the officer grabbed Young’s arm to initiate an arrest. A physical struggle ensued. Young tackled the officer to the ground, prompting multiple officers and station staff to intervene, with one officer shouting to "tase him." Young was ultimately subdued, handcuffed, and charged with criminal trespass and obstructing official business. This footage highlights a critical friction point between citizen rights and law enforcement authority. Was this a lawful arrest or did this officer violate his rights and assult Chris? Perspective A: The Officer Assaulted a Citizen Doing Legitimate Business From a strict civil liberties standpoint, many argue the officer was the unlawful aggressor. Right to be There: A police lobby is a public building funded by taxpayers. Young was there on legitimate business—to file a complaint regarding what he believed to be a fraudulent ticket. You cannot simply trespass a citizen from a public space when they are attempting to engage with their government/ have official business. The "Hands in Pockets" Fallacy: Keeping your hands in your pockets is not a crime. Because no crime was actively being committed, the officer's command to remove them was merely a request, not a lawful order. Initiating Force: Young was backing away and not posing an active physical threat. By "laying hands" on him first, the officer unlawfully escalated a verbal grievance into a physical assault, making the subsequent struggle a reaction to police aggression. Perspective B: The Officer Executed a Lawful Arrest for Obstruction From a law enforcement and prosecution standpoint, the officer's actions were fully justified under existing legal precedents. Limited Public Fora: Courts have consistently ruled that government buildings and police lobbies are "non-public fora." While open for business, citizens do not have an absolute right to remain if their conduct becomes disruptive or interferes with operations. Once ordered to leave by authorities, refusing to do so converts the stay into criminal trespass. Officer Safety and Terry Precedent: Under Terry v. Ohio, officers have the authority to manage a scene for safety. In a high-tension dispute, unseeable hands are a statistical threat for concealed weapons. Refusing a direct safety command to show your hands during an escalating dispute constitutes active non-compliance and obstruction. Lawful Use of Force: Once a subject actively obstructs and refuses a dispersal order, officers are legally permitted to use proportional physical force to effect an arrest. This case perfectly illustrates the fragile balance between a citizen's right to demand government accountability without fear of physical detention, and an officer's duty to maintain order and safety within a secure facility. Did the officer overstep his authority and assault a frustrated citizen, or did the citizen's non-compliance and disruption turn a legitimate grievance into a lawful arrest? I'm very interested to hear the debates on both sides.

Man gets arrested for demanding to speak with chief of police in police lobby. Who was wrong in this situation? Christopher Young walked into the Springboro Police Department lobby demanding to speak directly with the Chief of Police. Young was furious over a traffic citation he had received the previous day for not wearing a seatbelt—a ticket he adamantly claimed was based on a lie by the citing officer. When department staff informed him the chief was unavailable and asked him to calm down or leave, Young refused, repeatedly demanding to see leadership. The tension escalated rapidly when an officer ordered Young to take his hands out of his pockets. Young refused and began backing away. Believing Young was non-compliant and trespassing, the officer grabbed Young’s arm to initiate an arrest. A physical struggle ensued. Young tackled the officer to the ground, prompting multiple officers and station staff to intervene, with one officer shouting to "tase him." Young was ultimately subdued, handcuffed, and charged with criminal trespass and obstructing official business. This footage highlights a critical friction point between citizen rights and law enforcement authority. Was this a lawful arrest or did this officer violate his rights and assult Chris? Perspective A: The Officer Assaulted a Citizen Doing Legitimate Business From a strict civil liberties standpoint, many argue the officer was the unlawful aggressor. Right to be There: A police lobby is a public building funded by taxpayers. Young was there on legitimate business—to file a complaint regarding what he believed to be a fraudulent ticket. You cannot simply trespass a citizen from a public space when they are attempting to engage with their government/ have official business. The "Hands in Pockets" Fallacy: Keeping your hands in your pockets is not a crime. Because no crime was actively being committed, the officer's command to remove them was merely a request, not a lawful order. Initiating Force: Young was backing away and not posing an active physical threat. By "laying hands" on him first, the officer unlawfully escalated a verbal grievance into a physical assault, making the subsequent struggle a reaction to police aggression. Perspective B: The Officer Executed a Lawful Arrest for Obstruction From a law enforcement and prosecution standpoint, the officer's actions were fully justified under existing legal precedents. Limited Public Fora: Courts have consistently ruled that government buildings and police lobbies are "non-public fora." While open for business, citizens do not have an absolute right to remain if their conduct becomes disruptive or interferes with operations. Once ordered to leave by authorities, refusing to do so converts the stay into criminal trespass. Officer Safety and Terry Precedent: Under Terry v. Ohio, officers have the authority to manage a scene for safety. In a high-tension dispute, unseeable hands are a statistical threat for concealed weapons. Refusing a direct safety command to show your hands during an escalating dispute constitutes active non-compliance and obstruction. Lawful Use of Force: Once a subject actively obstructs and refuses a dispersal order, officers are legally permitted to use proportional physical force to effect an arrest. This case perfectly illustrates the fragile balance between a citizen's right to demand government accountability without fear of physical detention, and an officer's duty to maintain order and safety within a secure facility. Did the officer overstep his authority and assault a frustrated citizen, or did the citizen's non-compliance and disruption turn a legitimate grievance into a lawful arrest? I'm very interested to hear the debates on both sides.

Giggling Gannon

128,681 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

INDIANAPOLIS- Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Sergeant, Eric Huxley, 44, was sentenced to 1 year and 1 day in federal prison after pleading guilty to violating the civil rights of an arrestee by using excessive force. He was also fired. Huxley was on patrol in downtown Indianapolis when another officer requested his assistance in confronting a disorderly person. After officers placed the victim, identified as J.V., under arrest for disorderly conduct, Huxley assisted other officers with conducting an inventory of J.V.’s property. When officers began to remove J.V.’s belt, he became confrontational with the officers. The primary arresting officer used a department-approved takedown maneuver to bring J.V., who had already been handcuffed, to the ground. The arresting officer held J.V. down with one hand while a second officer restrained his legs. This reasonable and appropriate use of force effectively overcame J.V.’s resistance and rendered him physically unable to move. Despite knowing that J.V. had been effectively restrained and posed no further danger to officers or the public, Huxley then intentionally raised his right foot and drove it down onto J.V.’s head and face. “This sentence holds a former police officer accountable for abusing his authority when he violently assaulted a homeless man who posed no threat,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department is committed to aggressively investigating and prosecuting law enforcement officials who violate federal civil rights laws.”

INDIANAPOLIS- Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Sergeant, Eric Huxley, 44, was sentenced to 1 year and 1 day in federal prison after pleading guilty to violating the civil rights of an arrestee by using excessive force. He was also fired. Huxley was on patrol in downtown Indianapolis when another officer requested his assistance in confronting a disorderly person. After officers placed the victim, identified as J.V., under arrest for disorderly conduct, Huxley assisted other officers with conducting an inventory of J.V.’s property. When officers began to remove J.V.’s belt, he became confrontational with the officers. The primary arresting officer used a department-approved takedown maneuver to bring J.V., who had already been handcuffed, to the ground. The arresting officer held J.V. down with one hand while a second officer restrained his legs. This reasonable and appropriate use of force effectively overcame J.V.’s resistance and rendered him physically unable to move. Despite knowing that J.V. had been effectively restrained and posed no further danger to officers or the public, Huxley then intentionally raised his right foot and drove it down onto J.V.’s head and face. “This sentence holds a former police officer accountable for abusing his authority when he violently assaulted a homeless man who posed no threat,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department is committed to aggressively investigating and prosecuting law enforcement officials who violate federal civil rights laws.”

Damon Strong

15,741 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Getting fired was not enough for this guy, he decided to get himself arrested as well. This dude is really special. Officers with the St. Petersburg Police Department were called to the Bert Smith Euro Collection BMW dealership in response to a terminated service technician, Justin, who was refusing to leave the premises. When officers arrived on the scene, the situation quickly escalated due to Justin’s erratic behavior. He repeatedly argued with management and police, claiming his termination was invalid and asserting that he had a legal right to stay at his workstation. In an attempt to shift the focus, Justin produced a temperature gauge showing it was 90°F in the bay, arguing that the working conditions were illegal and that BMW corporate required all shops to be air-conditioned. The responding officer handled the situation calmly, explaining that employment disputes are strictly civil matters. Because the property owners wanted him off the premises, the officer issued a clear verbal trespass warning and gave Justin a final two-minute warning to pack up his toolbox and leave peacefully. Justin refused to comply, remaining seated at his station. When officers moved in to place him under arrest, he physically resisted, forcing them to take him to the ground to secure the handcuffs. The bizarre behavior continued in the back of the police cruiser. Justin managed to slip his handcuffs from the back to the front—an action officers noted would bring an additional charge—before launching into loud, repetitive chants praising the St. Petersburg Police Department. He then began sharing rambling, highly unusual personal details about his ex-girlfriend with the transport officer. Justin was ultimately booked and charged with criminal trespassing and resisting an officer without violence. This guy was either intoxicated or has some kind of mental problem that he needs help with. The officers did a great job with how they handled things as they gave him more than enough of a chance to do the right thing.

Getting fired was not enough for this guy, he decided to get himself arrested as well. This dude is really special. Officers with the St. Petersburg Police Department were called to the Bert Smith Euro Collection BMW dealership in response to a terminated service technician, Justin, who was refusing to leave the premises. When officers arrived on the scene, the situation quickly escalated due to Justin’s erratic behavior. He repeatedly argued with management and police, claiming his termination was invalid and asserting that he had a legal right to stay at his workstation. In an attempt to shift the focus, Justin produced a temperature gauge showing it was 90°F in the bay, arguing that the working conditions were illegal and that BMW corporate required all shops to be air-conditioned. The responding officer handled the situation calmly, explaining that employment disputes are strictly civil matters. Because the property owners wanted him off the premises, the officer issued a clear verbal trespass warning and gave Justin a final two-minute warning to pack up his toolbox and leave peacefully. Justin refused to comply, remaining seated at his station. When officers moved in to place him under arrest, he physically resisted, forcing them to take him to the ground to secure the handcuffs. The bizarre behavior continued in the back of the police cruiser. Justin managed to slip his handcuffs from the back to the front—an action officers noted would bring an additional charge—before launching into loud, repetitive chants praising the St. Petersburg Police Department. He then began sharing rambling, highly unusual personal details about his ex-girlfriend with the transport officer. Justin was ultimately booked and charged with criminal trespassing and resisting an officer without violence. This guy was either intoxicated or has some kind of mental problem that he needs help with. The officers did a great job with how they handled things as they gave him more than enough of a chance to do the right thing.

Giggling Gannon

39,027 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

OPEN LETTER TO THE NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE Dear Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, I am posting this video because the man in it is an officer of the Nigerian Police Force, and his remarks about Igbos and Peter Obi are deeply troubling. As an Igbo man, how am I expected to trust the Nigerian Police when one of its officers publicly profiles Igbos as ritualists and Yahoo boys? The Nigerian Police Force is a federal institution established to protect every Nigerian, regardless of tribe, ethnicity or political affiliation. An officer who publicly makes such disparaging and discriminatory remarks about a section of Nigerians has demonstrated conduct that is completely incompatible with the responsibility and dignity of the office he occupies. There is video evidence of his conduct. I am therefore calling on Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU to immediately identify this officer and dismiss him from the Nigerian Police Force with immediate effect. Anything less sends a dangerous message. If an officer can publicly make these statements about Igbos, remain in the Nigerian Police Force and face no serious disciplinary consequence, then the Nigerian public is entitled to question whether the position he expressed is tolerated by, or reflects the position of, the institution he represents. The Police Force must not allow silence or inaction to create that impression. This is about public trust. This is about the dignity of Nigerians. This is about whether an Igbo Nigerian can look at an officer of the Nigerian Police Force and believe that he will be treated fairly and without ethnic prejudice. Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, identify him, dismiss him and make it clear that this is not the position of the Nigerian Police Force.

OPEN LETTER TO THE NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE Dear Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, I am posting this video because the man in it is an officer of the Nigerian Police Force, and his remarks about Igbos and Peter Obi are deeply troubling. As an Igbo man, how am I expected to trust the Nigerian Police when one of its officers publicly profiles Igbos as ritualists and Yahoo boys? The Nigerian Police Force is a federal institution established to protect every Nigerian, regardless of tribe, ethnicity or political affiliation. An officer who publicly makes such disparaging and discriminatory remarks about a section of Nigerians has demonstrated conduct that is completely incompatible with the responsibility and dignity of the office he occupies. There is video evidence of his conduct. I am therefore calling on Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU to immediately identify this officer and dismiss him from the Nigerian Police Force with immediate effect. Anything less sends a dangerous message. If an officer can publicly make these statements about Igbos, remain in the Nigerian Police Force and face no serious disciplinary consequence, then the Nigerian public is entitled to question whether the position he expressed is tolerated by, or reflects the position of, the institution he represents. The Police Force must not allow silence or inaction to create that impression. This is about public trust. This is about the dignity of Nigerians. This is about whether an Igbo Nigerian can look at an officer of the Nigerian Police Force and believe that he will be treated fairly and without ethnic prejudice. Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, identify him, dismiss him and make it clear that this is not the position of the Nigerian Police Force.

𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑬𝑹𝑨𝑳 𝑺𝑵𝑶𝑾 🇨🇮

39,952 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Incompetent officers though their actions cause the largest settlement in the history of the country. Five officers get fired as a result. Richard "Randy" Cox was arrested in New Haven, Connecticut, on weapons charges that were later completely dismissed. What followed became one of the most devastating and heavily criticized incidents of police misconduct and negligence ever captured on camera. Placed into the back of a city transport van, Cox was handcuffed behind his back. The van was not equipped with seatbelts. While en route to the detention center, the driver slammed on the brakes to avoid an intersection collision. Without restraints to brace himself, Cox flew he@d-first into the metal partition wall, bre@king his n€ck. Despite his immediate, cries that he could not move and believed his n€ck was br0ken, the officers on duty at the jail openly mocked him. They accused him of being drunk, faking his injuries, and "doing extra shit." When he did arrive at the station, instead of waiting for medical personnel to safely immobilize him, officers dragged Cox out of the van by his feet, manhandled him into a wheelchair, and locked him in a holding cell literally leaving him on the floor with his legs and hands cuffed before he was finally transferred to a hospital. The incident left Cox paralyzed from the chest down. In the aftermath, the city of New Haven agreed to a historic $45 million settlement with the Cox family—the largest police misconduct settlement in U.S. history. The department completely overhauled its transportation policies to mandate seatbelts, and five officers involved were fired or forced into retirement while facing misdemeanor criminal charges. However, the legal resolution took a highly controversial turn regarding the driver of the van, Officer Oscar Diaz. While the New Haven Board of Police Commissioners originally voted unanimously to fire Diaz, the police union appealed. The Connecticut State Board of Mediation and Arbitration ultimately overturned his firing, ruling that a 15-day unpaid suspension was more appropriate because Diaz had an exemplary 15-year record, didn't control the lack of seatbelts, and had technically radioed for an ambulance. Personally I feel as though he should have been fired as he should have immediately waited for the ambulance where he was, or drove straight to the hospital himself. The city aggressively fought the decision in state court, but after losing their final appeal, officials were legally forced to reinstate Diaz to the force on administrative duties. Furthermore, a judge completely dismissed the criminal charges against him and two other officers through an accelerated rehabilitation program. As it stands, the driver is the only officer involved in the incident to successfully regain his job which again is kind of a slap in the face. In the end while five officers were fired, only 4 stayed fired due to one getting his job back.

Incompetent officers though their actions cause the largest settlement in the history of the country. Five officers get fired as a result. Richard "Randy" Cox was arrested in New Haven, Connecticut, on weapons charges that were later completely dismissed. What followed became one of the most devastating and heavily criticized incidents of police misconduct and negligence ever captured on camera. Placed into the back of a city transport van, Cox was handcuffed behind his back. The van was not equipped with seatbelts. While en route to the detention center, the driver slammed on the brakes to avoid an intersection collision. Without restraints to brace himself, Cox flew he@d-first into the metal partition wall, bre@king his n€ck. Despite his immediate, cries that he could not move and believed his n€ck was br0ken, the officers on duty at the jail openly mocked him. They accused him of being drunk, faking his injuries, and "doing extra shit." When he did arrive at the station, instead of waiting for medical personnel to safely immobilize him, officers dragged Cox out of the van by his feet, manhandled him into a wheelchair, and locked him in a holding cell literally leaving him on the floor with his legs and hands cuffed before he was finally transferred to a hospital. The incident left Cox paralyzed from the chest down. In the aftermath, the city of New Haven agreed to a historic $45 million settlement with the Cox family—the largest police misconduct settlement in U.S. history. The department completely overhauled its transportation policies to mandate seatbelts, and five officers involved were fired or forced into retirement while facing misdemeanor criminal charges. However, the legal resolution took a highly controversial turn regarding the driver of the van, Officer Oscar Diaz. While the New Haven Board of Police Commissioners originally voted unanimously to fire Diaz, the police union appealed. The Connecticut State Board of Mediation and Arbitration ultimately overturned his firing, ruling that a 15-day unpaid suspension was more appropriate because Diaz had an exemplary 15-year record, didn't control the lack of seatbelts, and had technically radioed for an ambulance. Personally I feel as though he should have been fired as he should have immediately waited for the ambulance where he was, or drove straight to the hospital himself. The city aggressively fought the decision in state court, but after losing their final appeal, officials were legally forced to reinstate Diaz to the force on administrative duties. Furthermore, a judge completely dismissed the criminal charges against him and two other officers through an accelerated rehabilitation program. As it stands, the driver is the only officer involved in the incident to successfully regain his job which again is kind of a slap in the face. In the end while five officers were fired, only 4 stayed fired due to one getting his job back.

Giggling Gannon

218,549 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Officer gets butt hurt over his ego and finds himself in the unemployment line. Probationary Uniontown Police Department Officer Dylan Soisson was conducting a routine traffic stop in Lake Township, Ohio. As a driver named Jeff passed by, he shouted, "Fuck you, pig." Instead of continuing his duties, Officer Soisson abruptly terminated his original stop—letting that driver go without a ticket—to pursue Jeff. He jumped back in his cruiser and you can hear the engine accelerate as he floors it just to go after this man. After pulling Jeff over he had him hold his arms out the window like he was some violent criminal. Soisson claimed he smelled burnt marijuana from the moving vehicle, alleged he saw furtive movements, ordered Jeff out, handcuffed him, and placed him in the back of the patrol cruiser. Inside the cruiser, Soisson tried to justify the detention under Ohio’s disorderly conduct statute and obstruction, claiming shouting profanities was unlawful. When his Officer in Charge (OIC) arrived on scene, the supervisor had to step in and remind Soisson of basic constitutional precedent: verbal insults directed at law enforcement are protected under the First Amendment. The officer reluctantly conceded and Jeff was ultimately released with an "educational" warning about state laws regarding disorderly conduct and the new law requiring transporting marijuana items in the trunk. Post incident: Jeff filed a formal complaint the following day alleging: • First Amendment retaliation for protected speech • Unlawful stop, detention, and vehicle search (Fourth Amendment) • Excessive force during the aggressive handcuffing process The internal administrative investigation determined Soisson completely lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to initiate the stop, fabricating shifting justifications to punish protected speech. Chief Michael Batchik and the department command determined the constitutional violations were too severe for a probationary officer, leading the Lake Township Trustees to vote unanimously to fire him. Profanity may be rude, but hurt feelings do not grant police the authority to violate the Constitution. Officers without the temperament to handle verbal criticism have no business carrying a badge or a gun. Great job by the chief to recognize this early and get him off the force.

Officer gets butt hurt over his ego and finds himself in the unemployment line. Probationary Uniontown Police Department Officer Dylan Soisson was conducting a routine traffic stop in Lake Township, Ohio. As a driver named Jeff passed by, he shouted, "Fuck you, pig." Instead of continuing his duties, Officer Soisson abruptly terminated his original stop—letting that driver go without a ticket—to pursue Jeff. He jumped back in his cruiser and you can hear the engine accelerate as he floors it just to go after this man. After pulling Jeff over he had him hold his arms out the window like he was some violent criminal. Soisson claimed he smelled burnt marijuana from the moving vehicle, alleged he saw furtive movements, ordered Jeff out, handcuffed him, and placed him in the back of the patrol cruiser. Inside the cruiser, Soisson tried to justify the detention under Ohio’s disorderly conduct statute and obstruction, claiming shouting profanities was unlawful. When his Officer in Charge (OIC) arrived on scene, the supervisor had to step in and remind Soisson of basic constitutional precedent: verbal insults directed at law enforcement are protected under the First Amendment. The officer reluctantly conceded and Jeff was ultimately released with an "educational" warning about state laws regarding disorderly conduct and the new law requiring transporting marijuana items in the trunk. Post incident: Jeff filed a formal complaint the following day alleging: • First Amendment retaliation for protected speech • Unlawful stop, detention, and vehicle search (Fourth Amendment) • Excessive force during the aggressive handcuffing process The internal administrative investigation determined Soisson completely lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to initiate the stop, fabricating shifting justifications to punish protected speech. Chief Michael Batchik and the department command determined the constitutional violations were too severe for a probationary officer, leading the Lake Township Trustees to vote unanimously to fire him. Profanity may be rude, but hurt feelings do not grant police the authority to violate the Constitution. Officers without the temperament to handle verbal criticism have no business carrying a badge or a gun. Great job by the chief to recognize this early and get him off the force.

Giggling Gannon

71,133 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

An Anambra-based woman has cr!ed out after Nigeria Police Force officers arrested her husband while he was on his way to buy drinks. The officers accused him of being a thi£f and later ext0rted ₦200,000 from him at Flyover Opi Iweke, Onitsha. According to her, a few days ago, her husband went to buy drinks. On his way back, he was stopped by the police and asked to show his documents. After presenting them, the officers complained about the car’s custom color. Before he could explain, they accused him of theft, handcuffed him, and put him in a Hilux. When he insisted they take him to a police station, there was a back-and-forth, and eventually, he transferred ₦200,000 to them. After getting home, the wife started making calls to find out which police division the officers belonged to. She was later told it was Okpoko Police Station. When she and her husband got to the station, the serving DPO responded immediately and ordered all the policemen on duty to come out so her husband could identify the culprits. After every officer came out, the offending ones were nowhere to be seen. The DPO then sent other officers along with the woman and her husband to the exact junction where the incident happened. There, the culprits were pointed out, and the ₦200,000 was refunded immediately.

An Anambra-based woman has cr!ed out after Nigeria Police Force officers arrested her husband while he was on his way to buy drinks. The officers accused him of being a thi£f and later ext0rted ₦200,000 from him at Flyover Opi Iweke, Onitsha. According to her, a few days ago, her husband went to buy drinks. On his way back, he was stopped by the police and asked to show his documents. After presenting them, the officers complained about the car’s custom color. Before he could explain, they accused him of theft, handcuffed him, and put him in a Hilux. When he insisted they take him to a police station, there was a back-and-forth, and eventually, he transferred ₦200,000 to them. After getting home, the wife started making calls to find out which police division the officers belonged to. She was later told it was Okpoko Police Station. When she and her husband got to the station, the serving DPO responded immediately and ordered all the policemen on duty to come out so her husband could identify the culprits. After every officer came out, the offending ones were nowhere to be seen. The DPO then sent other officers along with the woman and her husband to the exact junction where the incident happened. There, the culprits were pointed out, and the ₦200,000 was refunded immediately.

CHUKS 🍥

63,376 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,891,964 просмотров • 1 год назад

State trooper spits in the face of a journalist that is asking him questions on his 75k in overtime pay for a desk job. Connecticut State Police Sergeant Bryan Fahey—a trooper reassigned to a 9-to-5 desk job over anger issues—made over $212,000 in a single year, with more than $75,000 coming from overtime pay. When independent journalist went to Fahey’s residence to ask about these taxpayer-funded overtime claims as one wonders how you accumulate 75k in OT working a desk job. Fahey immediately told the journalist to leave his property and as they were in the process of leaving, Fahey came out of his door and confronted the journalist with an unholstered firearm. The camera man's video shows an aggressive Fahey following the journalists down the road to the street with his firearm in hand while body checking the journalist, and spitting directly in the journalist's face. Instead of holding the trooper accountable, responding Groton Police Department officers claimed spitting on a civilian wasn't a crime and arrested Reyes for "voyeurism" and "trespassing" even though no signs were on the property stating no trespassing and the journalist was leaving immediately upon when asked to do so. Following the arrest and the footage going public, Fahey has resigned from the department. Also, Fahey had to turn himself in on criminal charges. The journalist has federal Section 1983 civil rights lawsuits are underway against Fahey, the Connecticut State Police, and the Groton Police Department for First Amendment retaliation and malicious prosecution.

State trooper spits in the face of a journalist that is asking him questions on his 75k in overtime pay for a desk job. Connecticut State Police Sergeant Bryan Fahey—a trooper reassigned to a 9-to-5 desk job over anger issues—made over $212,000 in a single year, with more than $75,000 coming from overtime pay. When independent journalist went to Fahey’s residence to ask about these taxpayer-funded overtime claims as one wonders how you accumulate 75k in OT working a desk job. Fahey immediately told the journalist to leave his property and as they were in the process of leaving, Fahey came out of his door and confronted the journalist with an unholstered firearm. The camera man's video shows an aggressive Fahey following the journalists down the road to the street with his firearm in hand while body checking the journalist, and spitting directly in the journalist's face. Instead of holding the trooper accountable, responding Groton Police Department officers claimed spitting on a civilian wasn't a crime and arrested Reyes for "voyeurism" and "trespassing" even though no signs were on the property stating no trespassing and the journalist was leaving immediately upon when asked to do so. Following the arrest and the footage going public, Fahey has resigned from the department. Also, Fahey had to turn himself in on criminal charges. The journalist has federal Section 1983 civil rights lawsuits are underway against Fahey, the Connecticut State Police, and the Groton Police Department for First Amendment retaliation and malicious prosecution.

Giggling Gannon

201,348 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Bully sergeant assaults journalist gets reported to lieutenant. They both get owned in real time. Powerful moments on here. What happens when a journalist asks a few simple questions on public property? In Hot Springs, Arkansas, it gets you a face full of police ego and broken equipment. We went down to the Hot Springs Police Department to get an update on the infamous "Halloween Incident" where Lt. Kenny May violently tackled a minor teenage girl over a discarded Red Bull can, sparking community outrage and second-degree battery charges. But instead of transparency, we got a masterclass in police bullying. While having a peaceful conversation with two polite officers, Sergeant M. Brown decided to step in and manufacture a conflict. Falsely claiming that asking questions constitutes "interfering with a governmental operation," Brown immediately began escalating the situation. When the journalism didn't stop, the badge-heavy tactics came out: Sergeant Brown walked right up, violated the journalist's rights, and physically snatched and breaks his camera mount. Enter Lieutenant L. Patrick. At first, the Lieutenant did exactly what you'd expect—he stood there making excuses, trying to protect his boy, and spinning the narrative to cover up the Sergeant's blatant misconduct. He even tried to claim the journalist was being "confrontational" just for testing the officer's knowledge on the First Amendment! But the cover-up crumbled the second the video was played back. When forced to look at the undeniable proof of his Sergeant committing criminal mischief and assault on tape, the Lieutenant realized he couldn't hide the truth. He was forced to admit that there cannot be two tiers of the law—what is illegal for a citizen is illegal for a cop. The Sergeant had to tuck his ego in, offer a weak apology, and the Lieutenant was forced to hand over formal citizen complaint forms. You really get a peek into how the minds of these officers work in this video. The lieutenant laughed it off when they wanted to report the assault as in his eyes it was no big deal, until the journalist spun it around on him and asked what would happen if he grabbed the lieutenant's camera. You can't go to jail for one and not the other. You see the light go on in his head in real time.

Bully sergeant assaults journalist gets reported to lieutenant. They both get owned in real time. Powerful moments on here. What happens when a journalist asks a few simple questions on public property? In Hot Springs, Arkansas, it gets you a face full of police ego and broken equipment. We went down to the Hot Springs Police Department to get an update on the infamous "Halloween Incident" where Lt. Kenny May violently tackled a minor teenage girl over a discarded Red Bull can, sparking community outrage and second-degree battery charges. But instead of transparency, we got a masterclass in police bullying. While having a peaceful conversation with two polite officers, Sergeant M. Brown decided to step in and manufacture a conflict. Falsely claiming that asking questions constitutes "interfering with a governmental operation," Brown immediately began escalating the situation. When the journalism didn't stop, the badge-heavy tactics came out: Sergeant Brown walked right up, violated the journalist's rights, and physically snatched and breaks his camera mount. Enter Lieutenant L. Patrick. At first, the Lieutenant did exactly what you'd expect—he stood there making excuses, trying to protect his boy, and spinning the narrative to cover up the Sergeant's blatant misconduct. He even tried to claim the journalist was being "confrontational" just for testing the officer's knowledge on the First Amendment! But the cover-up crumbled the second the video was played back. When forced to look at the undeniable proof of his Sergeant committing criminal mischief and assault on tape, the Lieutenant realized he couldn't hide the truth. He was forced to admit that there cannot be two tiers of the law—what is illegal for a citizen is illegal for a cop. The Sergeant had to tuck his ego in, offer a weak apology, and the Lieutenant was forced to hand over formal citizen complaint forms. You really get a peek into how the minds of these officers work in this video. The lieutenant laughed it off when they wanted to report the assault as in his eyes it was no big deal, until the journalist spun it around on him and asked what would happen if he grabbed the lieutenant's camera. You can't go to jail for one and not the other. You see the light go on in his head in real time.

Giggling Ganon

145,177 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

471,465 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

496,274 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Tyrant cop arrested a 22 year old because he rolled his window up, then has his father arrested and sprayed because he was recording the arrest. All resulted in a 200k settlement. The incident began when Keller Police Sergeant Blake Shimanek pulled over 22-year-old Dillon Puente in a residential neighborhood for making a "wide right turn." When Shimanek approached the vehicle, Dillon partially rolled up his window to speak with him. Shimanek immediately interpreted this action as highly suspicious, ordered Dillon out of the vehicle, and placed him in handcuffs. Dillon later explained he was simply nervous. While the stop was happening, Dillon's father, Marco Puente, drove up in a separate vehicle. Recognizing that something was wrong, Marco parked legally, stepped onto the sidewalk across the street, and began recording the interaction on his cell phone to document the encounter. Sergeant Shimanek ordered another officer on the scene, Ankit Tomer, to arrest the father. When Marco asked what he was being arrested for, Shimanek claimed it was for "blocking the roadway"—a claim flatly contradicted by dashcam and bodycam footage. The officers wrestled Marco to the ground, and under Shimanek's orders, Officer Tomer pepper-sprayed Marco directly in the face. Marco was denied immediate medical attention on the scene, despite his eyes burning severely for about 30 min. The internal video was reviewed and action came swiftly in return. Within days of the incident, the Keller Police Department dropped all charges against both the father and the son. Keller Police Chief Brad Fortune personally issued a formal apology, stating that the officers' behavior was completely unacceptable and should never have happened. The City of Keller quickly offer a settlement to defuse the situation to the tune of $200,000 to the family. Sergeant Shimanek was initially demoted two ranks to patrol officer but subsequently resigned from the department. He was later indicted by a grand jury and pleaded guilty to official oppression (a Class A misdemeanor). As a consequence of his plea, he was stripped of his peace officer license, permanently barring him from working in Texas law enforcement. Officer Tomer did not face disciplinary action or charges, as internal investigations concluded he was strictly acting under the direct orders of his supervisor.

Tyrant cop arrested a 22 year old because he rolled his window up, then has his father arrested and sprayed because he was recording the arrest. All resulted in a 200k settlement. The incident began when Keller Police Sergeant Blake Shimanek pulled over 22-year-old Dillon Puente in a residential neighborhood for making a "wide right turn." When Shimanek approached the vehicle, Dillon partially rolled up his window to speak with him. Shimanek immediately interpreted this action as highly suspicious, ordered Dillon out of the vehicle, and placed him in handcuffs. Dillon later explained he was simply nervous. While the stop was happening, Dillon's father, Marco Puente, drove up in a separate vehicle. Recognizing that something was wrong, Marco parked legally, stepped onto the sidewalk across the street, and began recording the interaction on his cell phone to document the encounter. Sergeant Shimanek ordered another officer on the scene, Ankit Tomer, to arrest the father. When Marco asked what he was being arrested for, Shimanek claimed it was for "blocking the roadway"—a claim flatly contradicted by dashcam and bodycam footage. The officers wrestled Marco to the ground, and under Shimanek's orders, Officer Tomer pepper-sprayed Marco directly in the face. Marco was denied immediate medical attention on the scene, despite his eyes burning severely for about 30 min. The internal video was reviewed and action came swiftly in return. Within days of the incident, the Keller Police Department dropped all charges against both the father and the son. Keller Police Chief Brad Fortune personally issued a formal apology, stating that the officers' behavior was completely unacceptable and should never have happened. The City of Keller quickly offer a settlement to defuse the situation to the tune of $200,000 to the family. Sergeant Shimanek was initially demoted two ranks to patrol officer but subsequently resigned from the department. He was later indicted by a grand jury and pleaded guilty to official oppression (a Class A misdemeanor). As a consequence of his plea, he was stripped of his peace officer license, permanently barring him from working in Texas law enforcement. Officer Tomer did not face disciplinary action or charges, as internal investigations concluded he was strictly acting under the direct orders of his supervisor.

Giggling Gannon

135,950 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Tyrant officer pulls his firearm and loses his cool when a property owner kicks him off the property. Dr. P.J. Parmar of Aurora Co, drove into his own property’s garage on a Sunday evening to unload equipment following a Boy Scout outing he led. What he didn't expect was to be met with a drawn firearm. Inside the garage sat Aurora Police Officer Justin Henderson, parked while writing a report. When Dr. Parmar tapped his horn to ask the officer to clear the path, Officer Henderson claimed he was startled and feared a potential ambush. He exited his patrol vehicle with his gun drawn demanding that Dr. Parmar show his hands. Rather than backing down, Dr. Parmar remained calm and stood his ground. He clearly stated that he was on his own private property, repeatedly instructed the officer to leave, and began recording the interaction. Although Officer Henderson eventually holstered his weapon, he refused to leave the property, demanded proof of ownership from Dr. Parmar, and called for backup. Undeterred, Dr. Parmar simply ignored the threats from the officer and went about his business carrying gear inside. Officers eventually left the scene without issuing any citations. Following the release of the bodycam, the Aurora Police Department conducted an internal investigation. Officer Henderson received a 40-hour unpaid suspension and was ordered to complete de-escalation training. Dr. Parmar publicly criticized the sanction as far too lenient. Dr. Parmar subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Officer Henderson and the City of Aurora, alleging illegal seizure, excessive force, and racially motivated mistreatment. U.S. District Court Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissed the lawsuit. The court reasoned that because Dr. Parmar never submitted to police authority and continued moving freely around his property, no legal "seizure" or unconstitutional force had occurred. However, the judge notably expressed deep concern over court testimony highlighting a pervasive "warrior mentality" in police training practices. What are your thoughts on this lawsuit or situation? Special treatment again for the cops?

Tyrant officer pulls his firearm and loses his cool when a property owner kicks him off the property. Dr. P.J. Parmar of Aurora Co, drove into his own property’s garage on a Sunday evening to unload equipment following a Boy Scout outing he led. What he didn't expect was to be met with a drawn firearm. Inside the garage sat Aurora Police Officer Justin Henderson, parked while writing a report. When Dr. Parmar tapped his horn to ask the officer to clear the path, Officer Henderson claimed he was startled and feared a potential ambush. He exited his patrol vehicle with his gun drawn demanding that Dr. Parmar show his hands. Rather than backing down, Dr. Parmar remained calm and stood his ground. He clearly stated that he was on his own private property, repeatedly instructed the officer to leave, and began recording the interaction. Although Officer Henderson eventually holstered his weapon, he refused to leave the property, demanded proof of ownership from Dr. Parmar, and called for backup. Undeterred, Dr. Parmar simply ignored the threats from the officer and went about his business carrying gear inside. Officers eventually left the scene without issuing any citations. Following the release of the bodycam, the Aurora Police Department conducted an internal investigation. Officer Henderson received a 40-hour unpaid suspension and was ordered to complete de-escalation training. Dr. Parmar publicly criticized the sanction as far too lenient. Dr. Parmar subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Officer Henderson and the City of Aurora, alleging illegal seizure, excessive force, and racially motivated mistreatment. U.S. District Court Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissed the lawsuit. The court reasoned that because Dr. Parmar never submitted to police authority and continued moving freely around his property, no legal "seizure" or unconstitutional force had occurred. However, the judge notably expressed deep concern over court testimony highlighting a pervasive "warrior mentality" in police training practices. What are your thoughts on this lawsuit or situation? Special treatment again for the cops?

Giggling Gannon

195,877 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Oklahoma sheriff department and local PD have a blow up while out on a call. The conflict began when a Lexington Police officer pulled over a black SUV for speeding (85 mph in a 55 mph zone). The driver was Cleveland County Sheriff Chris Amason, who was in a marked vehicle but was out of uniform. Amason informed the officer he was responding to a high-priority "SWAT call" involving a barricaded subject and an injured officer in the nearby town of Noble. The Lexington officer allowed the Sheriff to proceed but immediately notified his Chief. When Lexington Police Chief Ronnie Johnson and his officers arrived at the active tactical scene to offer assistance and investigate why their local police hadn't been notified of an operation in their jurisdiction, the situation escalated. Lieutenant John Szymanski of Cleveland County Sheriff's Office confronted the Lexington officers, telling them to "get the f*** out of my face." A physical scuffle broke out between Lieutenant Szymanski and a Lexington officer. Szymanski is seen grabbing and shoving the officer while shouting, "This is my county!" Sheriff Amason eventually intervened, telling the Lexington Chief that it was his operation and his county, essentially ordering the local police to leave the scene. Following the incident, the Lexington Police Department filed a formal complaint regarding the conduct of the Sheriff’s deputies. Yelling and swearing at each other is free speech. Placing your hand up to stop someone from entering into your space is also not assult. So at least they all got it right by not trying to arrest each other.

Oklahoma sheriff department and local PD have a blow up while out on a call. The conflict began when a Lexington Police officer pulled over a black SUV for speeding (85 mph in a 55 mph zone). The driver was Cleveland County Sheriff Chris Amason, who was in a marked vehicle but was out of uniform. Amason informed the officer he was responding to a high-priority "SWAT call" involving a barricaded subject and an injured officer in the nearby town of Noble. The Lexington officer allowed the Sheriff to proceed but immediately notified his Chief. When Lexington Police Chief Ronnie Johnson and his officers arrived at the active tactical scene to offer assistance and investigate why their local police hadn't been notified of an operation in their jurisdiction, the situation escalated. Lieutenant John Szymanski of Cleveland County Sheriff's Office confronted the Lexington officers, telling them to "get the f*** out of my face." A physical scuffle broke out between Lieutenant Szymanski and a Lexington officer. Szymanski is seen grabbing and shoving the officer while shouting, "This is my county!" Sheriff Amason eventually intervened, telling the Lexington Chief that it was his operation and his county, essentially ordering the local police to leave the scene. Following the incident, the Lexington Police Department filed a formal complaint regarding the conduct of the Sheriff’s deputies. Yelling and swearing at each other is free speech. Placing your hand up to stop someone from entering into your space is also not assult. So at least they all got it right by not trying to arrest each other.

Giggling Ganon

172,070 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Marc Merritt was in Baldwin, helping a friend bump-start a stalled bike outside the now-shuttered Appleton Estate lounge, when Nassau police officers demanded identification, he said. Merritt, who is Black, declined, saying he had done nothing wrong. Body camera footage obtained by Newsday shows officers herding him onto the sidewalk and against a building, yelling for his ID. When Merritt finally reached into his pocket for his driver’s license, an officer fired his Taser. He collapsed to the ground, yelling in pain. What happened to Merritt is not an outlier. Five years after New York ordered every police department to rethink how and against whom officers use force, police across the state are using more force — and against Black residents at sharply disproportionate rates — according to a Newsday analysis of more than 30,000 incidents. Read more on the use of force against Black people on Long Island:

Marc Merritt was in Baldwin, helping a friend bump-start a stalled bike outside the now-shuttered Appleton Estate lounge, when Nassau police officers demanded identification, he said. Merritt, who is Black, declined, saying he had done nothing wrong. Body camera footage obtained by Newsday shows officers herding him onto the sidewalk and against a building, yelling for his ID. When Merritt finally reached into his pocket for his driver’s license, an officer fired his Taser. He collapsed to the ground, yelling in pain. What happened to Merritt is not an outlier. Five years after New York ordered every police department to rethink how and against whom officers use force, police across the state are using more force — and against Black residents at sharply disproportionate rates — according to a Newsday analysis of more than 30,000 incidents. Read more on the use of force against Black people on Long Island:

Newsday

66,286 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 Critical questions on police conduct in Southampton: A military veteran involved in the Henry Nowak protests was charged with assaulting a police officer. He has now been found NOT GUILTY. Footage from the protest shows officers using significant physical force during his detention — including multiple officers engaging him with shields and batons while he was on the ground. If the court has ruled he did not assault police, serious questions remain about the level of force used against him and why no officers appear to be facing consequences. Veterans and protesters deserve fair treatment and proper accountability when force is used. This case highlights ongoing concerns about how these protests were handled. #Southampton #PoliceAccountability #JusticeForVeterans

🚨 Critical questions on police conduct in Southampton: A military veteran involved in the Henry Nowak protests was charged with assaulting a police officer. He has now been found NOT GUILTY. Footage from the protest shows officers using significant physical force during his detention — including multiple officers engaging him with shields and batons while he was on the ground. If the court has ruled he did not assault police, serious questions remain about the level of force used against him and why no officers appear to be facing consequences. Veterans and protesters deserve fair treatment and proper accountability when force is used. This case highlights ongoing concerns about how these protests were handled. #Southampton #PoliceAccountability #JusticeForVeterans

WasAcop

55,950 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Police catch up with a hit and run suspect waiting at McDonald's in the drive thru. From burgers to jail in the blink of an eye. Kent Police Department officers located a Cadillac Escalade tied to a recent hit-and-run. The driver, identified as Justin, was spotted ordering food at a McDonald's drive-thru. Officers instructed him to park the vehicle so they could conduct an investigation. While Justin initially complied and exited the SUV, the interaction quickly escalated. Justin repeatedly ignored commands to keep his hands out of his pockets and attempted to walk away from officers, claiming his son was inside the restaurant. After being informed he was under arrest for obstruction, Justin pulled away as an officer attempted to secure his arms. Despite multiple warnings that he would be tased, Justin continued to resist. Officers took him down to the pavement with some questionable strikes to gain compliance before successfully securing him in handcuffs. Following the arrest, Justin was asked if he would take a field sobriety test and he declined. He was informed that a warrant was going to be issued to take a blood sample. He was subsequently transported and booked into the Kent Jail. Justin faces multiple charges, including: Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Resisting Arrest Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Following his booking, officers did get the search warrant to obtain a blood sample and determine his exact blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time of the incident was above the legal limit.

Police catch up with a hit and run suspect waiting at McDonald's in the drive thru. From burgers to jail in the blink of an eye. Kent Police Department officers located a Cadillac Escalade tied to a recent hit-and-run. The driver, identified as Justin, was spotted ordering food at a McDonald's drive-thru. Officers instructed him to park the vehicle so they could conduct an investigation. While Justin initially complied and exited the SUV, the interaction quickly escalated. Justin repeatedly ignored commands to keep his hands out of his pockets and attempted to walk away from officers, claiming his son was inside the restaurant. After being informed he was under arrest for obstruction, Justin pulled away as an officer attempted to secure his arms. Despite multiple warnings that he would be tased, Justin continued to resist. Officers took him down to the pavement with some questionable strikes to gain compliance before successfully securing him in handcuffs. Following the arrest, Justin was asked if he would take a field sobriety test and he declined. He was informed that a warrant was going to be issued to take a blood sample. He was subsequently transported and booked into the Kent Jail. Justin faces multiple charges, including: Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Resisting Arrest Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Following his booking, officers did get the search warrant to obtain a blood sample and determine his exact blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time of the incident was above the legal limit.

Giggling Gannon

270,660 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад