Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Unhinged detective completely loses his composure all on camera over two men that stand up to his bully style tactics. Detective Sergeant Greg Morabito of the Utica Police Department in Michigan responded to a call at a gas station parking lot after a driver reported being recorded by some... independent journalists. What happened next became a textbook example of how not to handle public interactions—and the entire confrontation was caught in 4k. Morabito pulled up in an unmarked SUV and attempted to question the men recording in public. Exercising their rights, the journalists immediately shut him down, reminding him that they were under no legal obligation to answer questions without reasonable suspicion of a crime, and advised him to go speak to the reporting party instead. Morabito refused to disengage, insisting they were going to answer his questions. The situation quickly degraded into an intense argument over police policy, tax-funded property, and constitutional rights. During the exchange, Morabito became more and more unhinged as he saw that he was not going to be successfully in steam rolling the rights of these men. He eventually got so lost in his anger that he flipped off the men, yelled, and eventually swatted the camera out of Jones’s hand as officers on the scene repeatedly tried to pull Morabito back and de-escalate their supervisor. After officers left the scene, the journalists went directly to the Utica Police Department station to file a formal misconduct complaint against Morabito. Instead of a complaint process, Morabito gave them "two minutes" to leave before arresting and handcuffing Jones for disorderly conduct. Once the footage was released, Morabito was placed on administrative leave while the department launched an internal review. The Macomb County Sheriff's Office conducted an independent investigation into the officer's actions. While prosecutors ultimately declined to press criminal charges against Morabito, the internal pressure and public outcry led to his official resignation from the Utica Police Department. Public service requires accountability, transparency, and a cool head under pressure. This detective displayed none of this. It's scary to think how many folks this man. Most likely violated the rights of over the years and got away with it.show more

Giggling Ganon

260,892 subscribers

118,205 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Ganon

110,469 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Bully officer that does not know the law costs his department 41,000 dollars. The incident took place outside the Pueblo Police Department in Colorado, where an independent journalist known as O'Connel was filming and taking photos from a public sidewalk. As we all know this a protected right that we all have. This journalist is exercising those very rights. Officer Romero notices O'Connel recording police vehicles and the building. He approaches and demands to know who O'Connel is and what he's doing. O'Connel exercises his right to remain silent and attempts to walk away. Instead of letting him go, Officer Romero immediately grabs him and places him in handcuffs. When pressed on why he is detaining the citizen, Officer Romero claims he has "reasonable suspicion." However, as O'Connel rightly points out on the scene, recording from a public sidewalk and refusing to answer a police officer's questions is not a crime, nor does it establish reasonable suspicion of a crime. The moment Captain Martin (the supervisor) arrives on the scene, the entire dynamic shifts. Captain Martin instantly recognizes the situation, identifies O'Connell as he has seen his work, and tells Officer Romero point-blank: "He has every right to do that." The supervisor orders the immediate release of the journalist, leaving the arresting officer to face a swift internal affairs complaint for deprivation of rights and illegal detainment. In the end in order to avoid litigation caused by the incompetence of officer Romero, their department settled for 41,000 dollars.

Bully officer that does not know the law costs his department 41,000 dollars. The incident took place outside the Pueblo Police Department in Colorado, where an independent journalist known as O'Connel was filming and taking photos from a public sidewalk. As we all know this a protected right that we all have. This journalist is exercising those very rights. Officer Romero notices O'Connel recording police vehicles and the building. He approaches and demands to know who O'Connel is and what he's doing. O'Connel exercises his right to remain silent and attempts to walk away. Instead of letting him go, Officer Romero immediately grabs him and places him in handcuffs. When pressed on why he is detaining the citizen, Officer Romero claims he has "reasonable suspicion." However, as O'Connel rightly points out on the scene, recording from a public sidewalk and refusing to answer a police officer's questions is not a crime, nor does it establish reasonable suspicion of a crime. The moment Captain Martin (the supervisor) arrives on the scene, the entire dynamic shifts. Captain Martin instantly recognizes the situation, identifies O'Connell as he has seen his work, and tells Officer Romero point-blank: "He has every right to do that." The supervisor orders the immediate release of the journalist, leaving the arresting officer to face a swift internal affairs complaint for deprivation of rights and illegal detainment. In the end in order to avoid litigation caused by the incompetence of officer Romero, their department settled for 41,000 dollars.

Giggling Ganon

431,158 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

15 year old boy puts bully cops in their place showing he understands the law better than they do. In this footage you will see the arrest of resident Michael Franchek. The catalyst? A heated verbal argument with a neighbor over Franchek’s teenage son riding a gas-powered motorized bicycle around the complex. The neighbor called 911, alleging that Franchek had a handgun tucked into his waistband during the dispute. When officers knocked on Franchek’s door to investigate the weapons report, things went south fast: Franchek stood on his porch greeted the offices but exercised his rights to refuse to answer questions about the incident and demanding the officers' names and badge numbers. The moment Franchek attempted to back away and step into his own home, officers crossed the threshold, physically grabbed him, and took him into custody. Officers later claimed the entry was justified under "exigent circumstances" because they didn't know if he was reaching for a weapon. In come jack the 15 year old son of the Michael. With camera in hand he documented the encounter all while giving a lesson in law to these officers. You can see their frustration grow as they begin to understand that they were not going to trample over the rights of this 15 year old. Franchek was booked into the Summit County Jail on multiple misdemeanor charges, including Interference with an Arresting Officer, Failure to Disclose Identity, and Disorderly Conduct. Franchek fired back by launching a massive federal civil rights lawsuit against the city and the officers involved, seeking over $900,000 in damages for warrantless entry and excessive force. Thanks to the footage from Jack an investigation was conducted on the officers involved. An internal affairs investigation by the department alongside an independent review did find policy violations, resulting in administrative discipline. In the end Officer James Rodrigues and Sergeant Cameron Thor—are no longer with the department. Know your rights and make sure your family is equipped with that same knowledge. You never know when it will be needed.

15 year old boy puts bully cops in their place showing he understands the law better than they do. In this footage you will see the arrest of resident Michael Franchek. The catalyst? A heated verbal argument with a neighbor over Franchek’s teenage son riding a gas-powered motorized bicycle around the complex. The neighbor called 911, alleging that Franchek had a handgun tucked into his waistband during the dispute. When officers knocked on Franchek’s door to investigate the weapons report, things went south fast: Franchek stood on his porch greeted the offices but exercised his rights to refuse to answer questions about the incident and demanding the officers' names and badge numbers. The moment Franchek attempted to back away and step into his own home, officers crossed the threshold, physically grabbed him, and took him into custody. Officers later claimed the entry was justified under "exigent circumstances" because they didn't know if he was reaching for a weapon. In come jack the 15 year old son of the Michael. With camera in hand he documented the encounter all while giving a lesson in law to these officers. You can see their frustration grow as they begin to understand that they were not going to trample over the rights of this 15 year old. Franchek was booked into the Summit County Jail on multiple misdemeanor charges, including Interference with an Arresting Officer, Failure to Disclose Identity, and Disorderly Conduct. Franchek fired back by launching a massive federal civil rights lawsuit against the city and the officers involved, seeking over $900,000 in damages for warrantless entry and excessive force. Thanks to the footage from Jack an investigation was conducted on the officers involved. An internal affairs investigation by the department alongside an independent review did find policy violations, resulting in administrative discipline. In the end Officer James Rodrigues and Sergeant Cameron Thor—are no longer with the department. Know your rights and make sure your family is equipped with that same knowledge. You never know when it will be needed.

Giggling Ganon

66,924 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Male karen loses his mind because he does not want to be on camera. A peaceful filming session in a public space quickly escalated into a physical altercation, a threat of pepper spray, and a lesson in First Amendment rights outside a BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse in Anaheim Hills, California. The incident began while a journalist was recording video outside the restaurant's outdoor patio area. A customer dining on the patio took issue with being filmed. Instead of ignoring the camera or asking the creator to move along, the customer escalated the situation by stepping around the patio partition to directly confront the cameraman. The interaction instantly turned physical as the customer attempted to grab the recording equipment. Seeing the journalists being targeted, on of his partners jumped in to intervene, physically pushing the customer back. To prevent further advancement from the customer or surrounding patrons, the partner brandished pepper spray, loudly warning the crowd to back up or face being sprayed. Restaurant employees and nearby diners stepped in to separate everyone before the violence could escalate further. When the Anaheim Police Department arrived on the scene, they were met with two very different approaches from officers. The first officer wanted to treat the journalist like they were the problem and not the victim as he demanded ID out of the gate without even seeing the evidence. When he sergeant arrived things moved in the right direction as he respected the rights of the journalists as the complaint was taken. After talking to the sergeant the journalist decided to shift gears. Expressing that his primary goal was to educate the public on constitutional rights rather than see someone hauled off to jail, the journalist offered a compromise. He stated he would forgo pressing charges if the customer agreed to a formal, face-to-face apology. The police sergeant stepped in to facilitate, and the customer ultimately apologized to the journalist directly on camera. With the apology accepted, the journalist declined to pursue the matter further, and officers concluded the investigation with zero arrests.

Male karen loses his mind because he does not want to be on camera. A peaceful filming session in a public space quickly escalated into a physical altercation, a threat of pepper spray, and a lesson in First Amendment rights outside a BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse in Anaheim Hills, California. The incident began while a journalist was recording video outside the restaurant's outdoor patio area. A customer dining on the patio took issue with being filmed. Instead of ignoring the camera or asking the creator to move along, the customer escalated the situation by stepping around the patio partition to directly confront the cameraman. The interaction instantly turned physical as the customer attempted to grab the recording equipment. Seeing the journalists being targeted, on of his partners jumped in to intervene, physically pushing the customer back. To prevent further advancement from the customer or surrounding patrons, the partner brandished pepper spray, loudly warning the crowd to back up or face being sprayed. Restaurant employees and nearby diners stepped in to separate everyone before the violence could escalate further. When the Anaheim Police Department arrived on the scene, they were met with two very different approaches from officers. The first officer wanted to treat the journalist like they were the problem and not the victim as he demanded ID out of the gate without even seeing the evidence. When he sergeant arrived things moved in the right direction as he respected the rights of the journalists as the complaint was taken. After talking to the sergeant the journalist decided to shift gears. Expressing that his primary goal was to educate the public on constitutional rights rather than see someone hauled off to jail, the journalist offered a compromise. He stated he would forgo pressing charges if the customer agreed to a formal, face-to-face apology. The police sergeant stepped in to facilitate, and the customer ultimately apologized to the journalist directly on camera. With the apology accepted, the journalist declined to pursue the matter further, and officers concluded the investigation with zero arrests.

Giggling Ganon

31,428 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Lagos: A man has accused officers allegedly attached to the Festac Police Division of as$ault!ng him during a stop-and-search operation According to his account, the officers stopped him and requested to search his bag. After finding nothing incr!m!nating, they allegedly ordered him to accompany them to the police station. He said he refused, insisting he had committed no offence The man further claimed the officers were not properly dressed in police uniforms and arrived in an unregistered bus. He alleged that they then dragged him, attempted to force him into the vehicle, and that one of the officers struck him on the head with a gun before repeatedly as$ault!ng him He called on POLICE COMPLAINT to investigate the inc!dent

Lagos: A man has accused officers allegedly attached to the Festac Police Division of as$ault!ng him during a stop-and-search operation According to his account, the officers stopped him and requested to search his bag. After finding nothing incr!m!nating, they allegedly ordered him to accompany them to the police station. He said he refused, insisting he had committed no offence The man further claimed the officers were not properly dressed in police uniforms and arrived in an unregistered bus. He alleged that they then dragged him, attempted to force him into the vehicle, and that one of the officers struck him on the head with a gun before repeatedly as$ault!ng him He called on POLICE COMPLAINT to investigate the inc!dent

👑 Edo Online TV 📺

129,971 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

State trooper spits in the face of a journalist that is asking him questions on his 75k in overtime pay for a desk job. Connecticut State Police Sergeant Bryan Fahey—a trooper reassigned to a 9-to-5 desk job over anger issues—made over $212,000 in a single year, with more than $75,000 coming from overtime pay. When independent journalist went to Fahey’s residence to ask about these taxpayer-funded overtime claims as one wonders how you accumulate 75k in OT working a desk job. Fahey immediately told the journalist to leave his property and as they were in the process of leaving, Fahey came out of his door and confronted the journalist with an unholstered firearm. The camera man's video shows an aggressive Fahey following the journalists down the road to the street with his firearm in hand while body checking the journalist, and spitting directly in the journalist's face. Instead of holding the trooper accountable, responding Groton Police Department officers claimed spitting on a civilian wasn't a crime and arrested Reyes for "voyeurism" and "trespassing" even though no signs were on the property stating no trespassing and the journalist was leaving immediately upon when asked to do so. Following the arrest and the footage going public, Fahey has resigned from the department. Also, Fahey had to turn himself in on criminal charges. The journalist has federal Section 1983 civil rights lawsuits are underway against Fahey, the Connecticut State Police, and the Groton Police Department for First Amendment retaliation and malicious prosecution.

State trooper spits in the face of a journalist that is asking him questions on his 75k in overtime pay for a desk job. Connecticut State Police Sergeant Bryan Fahey—a trooper reassigned to a 9-to-5 desk job over anger issues—made over $212,000 in a single year, with more than $75,000 coming from overtime pay. When independent journalist went to Fahey’s residence to ask about these taxpayer-funded overtime claims as one wonders how you accumulate 75k in OT working a desk job. Fahey immediately told the journalist to leave his property and as they were in the process of leaving, Fahey came out of his door and confronted the journalist with an unholstered firearm. The camera man's video shows an aggressive Fahey following the journalists down the road to the street with his firearm in hand while body checking the journalist, and spitting directly in the journalist's face. Instead of holding the trooper accountable, responding Groton Police Department officers claimed spitting on a civilian wasn't a crime and arrested Reyes for "voyeurism" and "trespassing" even though no signs were on the property stating no trespassing and the journalist was leaving immediately upon when asked to do so. Following the arrest and the footage going public, Fahey has resigned from the department. Also, Fahey had to turn himself in on criminal charges. The journalist has federal Section 1983 civil rights lawsuits are underway against Fahey, the Connecticut State Police, and the Groton Police Department for First Amendment retaliation and malicious prosecution.

Giggling Ganon

199,027 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Napolian complex deputy assaults a man exercising his rights then refused to call a supervisor. A tense standoff in Pensacola, Florida which took place in April 2026 outside the Islamic Center of Northwest Florida on McLean Avenue, captured a confrontational interaction between an Escambia County Sheriff's deputy and a camera man exercising his rights. In the video, the you see a tyrant deputy that could not handle that this man knew his rights and did not have to listen to her, so she assaulted him then refused to call her supervisor. The cameraman refusal to disengage, coupled with the deputy's aggressive posture, led to a prolonged and volatile dispute that eventually drew the attention of department leadership. In the aftermath, the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office took immediate action by placing the deputy on administrative assignment to conduct a comprehensive internal review. Sheriff Chip Simmons later addressed the public, acknowledging that the deputy’s behavior during the incident fell short of the department’s professional standards and core values. Despite the criticism of the deputy’s inability to de-escalate the situation, the sheriff confirmed that the officer would eventually return to duty. This encounter underscores the ongoing friction between the rights of citizens to record in public spaces and the challenges law enforcement faces understanding and adhering to the rights of the citizens.

Napolian complex deputy assaults a man exercising his rights then refused to call a supervisor. A tense standoff in Pensacola, Florida which took place in April 2026 outside the Islamic Center of Northwest Florida on McLean Avenue, captured a confrontational interaction between an Escambia County Sheriff's deputy and a camera man exercising his rights. In the video, the you see a tyrant deputy that could not handle that this man knew his rights and did not have to listen to her, so she assaulted him then refused to call her supervisor. The cameraman refusal to disengage, coupled with the deputy's aggressive posture, led to a prolonged and volatile dispute that eventually drew the attention of department leadership. In the aftermath, the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office took immediate action by placing the deputy on administrative assignment to conduct a comprehensive internal review. Sheriff Chip Simmons later addressed the public, acknowledging that the deputy’s behavior during the incident fell short of the department’s professional standards and core values. Despite the criticism of the deputy’s inability to de-escalate the situation, the sheriff confirmed that the officer would eventually return to duty. This encounter underscores the ongoing friction between the rights of citizens to record in public spaces and the challenges law enforcement faces understanding and adhering to the rights of the citizens.

Giggling Ganon

243,840 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

You know the department is bad when even the Chief does not understand the law! They all get owned and do the walk of shame. A textbook lesson in constitutional rights unfolded right outside a Central Bank branch in Millstadt, Illinois, proving once again that public photography is not a crime—no matter how uncomfortable it makes the local authorities. It all started when a journalist was standing strictly on a public sidewalk and easement, minding his own business while on his cellphone. Because of the freezing winter weather, he was wearing a face mask. After looking toward the bank windows and checking out a balloon display inside, nervous bank employees called the Millstadt Police Department to report a "suspicious" masked individual filming the building. Officers Jacob Fowler and A. Smiddy arrived on the scene and immediately tried to flip the script. They demanded the auditor’s identification, claiming they needed to "document" his information so they could formally trespass him on behalf of the bank. The Police: Claimed that looking inside a bank window while wearing a mask on a freezing day constitutes "reasonable articulable suspicion" of a crime. They repeatedly called the journalist "uncooperative" simply for refusing to surrender his ID. The journalist: Kept his composure and stood his ground. He stood firmly on a public right-of-way, reminding the officers of his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. When officers claimed they were trespassing him from the property, he hit them with the ultimate logic check: "I was never on their property... Are you trespassing my eyeballs?" Realizing they had zero legal leverage to force compliance or make an arrest, the officers quickly ran out of answers. After a third officer arrived to hand out a business card (which was politely declined), the police finally admitted they knew exactly how this works—conceding that the journalist was within his rights to film them and post the interaction to online. With no law broken and no leg to stand on, the officers chose to disengage and walk away defeated. Know your rights, know the law, and never let them trespass your eyeballs.

You know the department is bad when even the Chief does not understand the law! They all get owned and do the walk of shame. A textbook lesson in constitutional rights unfolded right outside a Central Bank branch in Millstadt, Illinois, proving once again that public photography is not a crime—no matter how uncomfortable it makes the local authorities. It all started when a journalist was standing strictly on a public sidewalk and easement, minding his own business while on his cellphone. Because of the freezing winter weather, he was wearing a face mask. After looking toward the bank windows and checking out a balloon display inside, nervous bank employees called the Millstadt Police Department to report a "suspicious" masked individual filming the building. Officers Jacob Fowler and A. Smiddy arrived on the scene and immediately tried to flip the script. They demanded the auditor’s identification, claiming they needed to "document" his information so they could formally trespass him on behalf of the bank. The Police: Claimed that looking inside a bank window while wearing a mask on a freezing day constitutes "reasonable articulable suspicion" of a crime. They repeatedly called the journalist "uncooperative" simply for refusing to surrender his ID. The journalist: Kept his composure and stood his ground. He stood firmly on a public right-of-way, reminding the officers of his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. When officers claimed they were trespassing him from the property, he hit them with the ultimate logic check: "I was never on their property... Are you trespassing my eyeballs?" Realizing they had zero legal leverage to force compliance or make an arrest, the officers quickly ran out of answers. After a third officer arrived to hand out a business card (which was politely declined), the police finally admitted they knew exactly how this works—conceding that the journalist was within his rights to film them and post the interaction to online. With no law broken and no leg to stand on, the officers chose to disengage and walk away defeated. Know your rights, know the law, and never let them trespass your eyeballs.

Giggling Ganon

41,042 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sergeant has zero understanding of the law, gets schooled as he becomes unglued. Westmont Police Sergeant Confronted by Independent Journalist over First Amendment Rights. A Westmont Police Department Sergeant, tasked with supervising officers and upholding the law, recently demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of basic constitutional protections during an encounter with an independent journalist. When the Sergeant attempted to claim that filming from a public space violated LEADS regulations due to visible information on an unshielded laptop screen, the journalist stood his ground. He clearly articulated established court precedents—including ACLU v. Alvarez, Glick v. Cunniffe, and Terry v. Ohio—reminding the officer that citizens have a protected right to record public officials performing their duties in public spaces. Furthermore, the journalist pointed out that officers bear the responsibility of securing their own confidential screens, rather than infringing on a citizen's constitutional rights. Faced with unwavering legal knowledge and no valid legal grounds for detention, the Sergeant was forced to disengage and leave the scene doing that walk of shame as he realized in the back of his head that he is about to become a social media star in a bad way. Know your rights and do not be afraid to stand up and exercise them. Together we will continue to make those that swore to protect the constitution but fail to do so famous. Meet officer Sergeant Rolando Padilla of the Westmont IL PD.

Sergeant has zero understanding of the law, gets schooled as he becomes unglued. Westmont Police Sergeant Confronted by Independent Journalist over First Amendment Rights. A Westmont Police Department Sergeant, tasked with supervising officers and upholding the law, recently demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of basic constitutional protections during an encounter with an independent journalist. When the Sergeant attempted to claim that filming from a public space violated LEADS regulations due to visible information on an unshielded laptop screen, the journalist stood his ground. He clearly articulated established court precedents—including ACLU v. Alvarez, Glick v. Cunniffe, and Terry v. Ohio—reminding the officer that citizens have a protected right to record public officials performing their duties in public spaces. Furthermore, the journalist pointed out that officers bear the responsibility of securing their own confidential screens, rather than infringing on a citizen's constitutional rights. Faced with unwavering legal knowledge and no valid legal grounds for detention, the Sergeant was forced to disengage and leave the scene doing that walk of shame as he realized in the back of his head that he is about to become a social media star in a bad way. Know your rights and do not be afraid to stand up and exercise them. Together we will continue to make those that swore to protect the constitution but fail to do so famous. Meet officer Sergeant Rolando Padilla of the Westmont IL PD.

Giggling Ganon

102,269 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

An officer with the Baltimore Police Department used his firearm in a shooting that occurred on the 1700 block of Pennsylvania Avenue in the Upton neighborhood of the city on Thursday, according to the department. Shortly after noon, CCTV alerted officers to a fight near Wilson and Penn avenues, where three men were sparring. Responding officers were warned that one of the individuals was armed with a knife. Officers pursued the suspect after he refused to stop. A struggle ensued as an officer tried to arrest the suspect, who resisted while clinging to a satchel on his person. Read more: 🎥: Shared anonymously and verified by Baltimore Police

An officer with the Baltimore Police Department used his firearm in a shooting that occurred on the 1700 block of Pennsylvania Avenue in the Upton neighborhood of the city on Thursday, according to the department. Shortly after noon, CCTV alerted officers to a fight near Wilson and Penn avenues, where three men were sparring. Responding officers were warned that one of the individuals was armed with a knife. Officers pursued the suspect after he refused to stop. A struggle ensued as an officer tried to arrest the suspect, who resisted while clinging to a satchel on his person. Read more: 🎥: Shared anonymously and verified by Baltimore Police

The Baltimore Sun

13,104 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Dude gets bent out of shape because he does not want to be on camera. Assaults camera man goes to jail. We are in Mauldin south Carolina where you see a cameraman just exercising his rights to film in public, but then this guy in the white truck decides he gets call the shots on what people's rights are. He threatened to come back and that is what he did. He tried to run the camera man over then got out of his truck chases the camera man down and swings at him. Police arrived and after the video was shown the man in the truck found himself in it back of a squad car. This is a great lesson in keeping one's hands to themselves as well as don't try to infringe on the rights of others.

Dude gets bent out of shape because he does not want to be on camera. Assaults camera man goes to jail. We are in Mauldin south Carolina where you see a cameraman just exercising his rights to film in public, but then this guy in the white truck decides he gets call the shots on what people's rights are. He threatened to come back and that is what he did. He tried to run the camera man over then got out of his truck chases the camera man down and swings at him. Police arrived and after the video was shown the man in the truck found himself in it back of a squad car. This is a great lesson in keeping one's hands to themselves as well as don't try to infringe on the rights of others.

Giggling Ganon

45,755 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anti ice protesters call the cops to try and claim they are victims. It didn't take long for the truth to come out and the protesters end up taking a ride to jail. A woman claimed that her and her husband were demonstrating along the roadway near a QuikTrip gas station in Sand Springs, Oklahoma, holding signs and wearing anti-ice apparel. She claimed that everything was peaceful until a bystander in a red vehicle allegedly yelled at them regarding their signs. Determined to record the motorist, the woman walked over to film him and capture his license plate. According to the couple, the driver spat in her face and attempted to back his car into her. In response, the woman threw one of her protest signs at the moving vehicle. When her husband attempted to intervene, he was knocked to the ground, sustaining abrasions to his knees. Sand Springs officers arrived on scene to handle what was reported as an active fight. While the couple maintained they were solely victims of an unprovoked hit-and-run, officers immediately requested to review external security camera footage from the QuikTrip to verify the claims. As expected the truth was not on the side of the protester as the video showed her and husband to be the aggressors from throwing stuff at the car to trying to rip off his mirror. It was clear that their unhinged rage was in full control of their actions. While their ability is to protest is well within their First Amendment rights. Throwing stuff at cars and trying to destroy property is not. The officers placed her under arrest for her actions toward the vehicle. Meanwhile, EMS was dispatched to evaluate her husband's injuries and he was alerted he was under arrest as well, and their vehicle was impounded. Play stupid games and win stupid prizes.

Anti ice protesters call the cops to try and claim they are victims. It didn't take long for the truth to come out and the protesters end up taking a ride to jail. A woman claimed that her and her husband were demonstrating along the roadway near a QuikTrip gas station in Sand Springs, Oklahoma, holding signs and wearing anti-ice apparel. She claimed that everything was peaceful until a bystander in a red vehicle allegedly yelled at them regarding their signs. Determined to record the motorist, the woman walked over to film him and capture his license plate. According to the couple, the driver spat in her face and attempted to back his car into her. In response, the woman threw one of her protest signs at the moving vehicle. When her husband attempted to intervene, he was knocked to the ground, sustaining abrasions to his knees. Sand Springs officers arrived on scene to handle what was reported as an active fight. While the couple maintained they were solely victims of an unprovoked hit-and-run, officers immediately requested to review external security camera footage from the QuikTrip to verify the claims. As expected the truth was not on the side of the protester as the video showed her and husband to be the aggressors from throwing stuff at the car to trying to rip off his mirror. It was clear that their unhinged rage was in full control of their actions. While their ability is to protest is well within their First Amendment rights. Throwing stuff at cars and trying to destroy property is not. The officers placed her under arrest for her actions toward the vehicle. Meanwhile, EMS was dispatched to evaluate her husband's injuries and he was alerted he was under arrest as well, and their vehicle was impounded. Play stupid games and win stupid prizes.

Giggling Ganon

37,099 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

$Man proves your rights do not change due to the weather outside or the time of day. At around 3:00 AM during snowfall, an individual equipped with a long rifle, tactical vest, and face covering was walking along a public sidewalk near Rocky Mountain Motors. He stated he was out "training" in cold-weather gear. Englewood police officers approached and ordered the man to place his hands on his head, detaining him and placing him in handcuffs dispite no crime being committed that they could articulate. The man immediately invoked his First, Second, and Fourth Amendment rights, arguing that open carry of a firearm is lawful in the state and that officers lacked reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity. In the eyes of these officers, walking with a rifle outdoors at 3:00 AM during a snowstorm raised suspicion and justified stopping him for identification. When pressed on which law or ordinance was violated, officers acknowledged that open carry itself was not illegal and quickly realized that the constitution does not change based on the time of day. Lacking grounds or an articulated criminal infraction to mandate identification or prolong detention, officers ultimately removed the handcuffs and released the individual without charges. While it was great to eee these officers realize their error as the light bulb clicked on in their brains that what they were doing was in violation of this man's rights. Unfortunately we know in other areas with different officers, this could have turned out much worse. This is why it's important that men like this gentleman, test our rights for us to help educate these cops that they must actually honor the oath that they all took to defend the constitution of our country. Know your rights folks, and do not fear exercising them.$

Man proves your rights do not change due to the weather outside or the time of day. At around 3:00 AM during snowfall, an individual equipped with a long rifle, tactical vest, and face covering was walking along a public sidewalk near Rocky Mountain Motors. He stated he was out "training" in cold-weather gear. Englewood police officers approached and ordered the man to place his hands on his head, detaining him and placing him in handcuffs dispite no crime being committed that they could articulate. The man immediately invoked his First, Second, and Fourth Amendment rights, arguing that open carry of a firearm is lawful in the state and that officers lacked reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity. In the eyes of these officers, walking with a rifle outdoors at 3:00 AM during a snowstorm raised suspicion and justified stopping him for identification. When pressed on which law or ordinance was violated, officers acknowledged that open carry itself was not illegal and quickly realized that the constitution does not change based on the time of day. Lacking grounds or an articulated criminal infraction to mandate identification or prolong detention, officers ultimately removed the handcuffs and released the individual without charges. While it was great to eee these officers realize their error as the light bulb clicked on in their brains that what they were doing was in violation of this man's rights. Unfortunately we know in other areas with different officers, this could have turned out much worse. This is why it's important that men like this gentleman, test our rights for us to help educate these cops that they must actually honor the oath that they all took to defend the constitution of our country. Know your rights folks, and do not fear exercising them.

Giggling Ganon

80,669 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

496,274 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Tyrant cop arrests nurse because she refused to violate patient rights and break hospital policy. The University of Utah Hospital became the site of confrontation about the Fourth Amendment and the limits of police authority. Registered nurse Alex Wubbels was forcibly arrested by Salt Lake City Police Detective Jeff Payne after she refused to allow an illegal blood draw on an unconscious patient. The patient was an off-duty truck driver who had been involved in a head-on collision with a suspect fleeing from police. He was admitted to the hospital in a comatose state. Detective Payne sought the blood sample to check for illicit substances, despite the patient being a victim in the crash, not the suspect. Wubbels remained calm and presented the officer with the hospital's written policy—which had been agreed upon by the police department itself. She informed him that per the U.S. Supreme Court, a blood draw requires: A warrant. Patient consent. The patient to be under arrest. Since none of these conditions were met, Wubbels refused to comply. Detective Payne responded by manhandling her, placing her in handcuffs, and dragging her to a patrol car while she screamed for help. While outside Detective Payne yelled at Wubbels saying how long he was doing this and how he knows the law. Detective Jeff Payne was fired from the Salt Lake City Police Department following an internal investigation. Lt. James Tracy, Payne’s supervisor who ordered the arrest, was demoted. Legal Settlement: Alex Wubbels received a $1.5 million settlement from Salt Lake City and the University of Utah. Great job by this nurse for standing her ground and refusing to violate the rights of her patient. Seems like the nurse understands the law better than the people enforcing it in this situation.

Tyrant cop arrests nurse because she refused to violate patient rights and break hospital policy. The University of Utah Hospital became the site of confrontation about the Fourth Amendment and the limits of police authority. Registered nurse Alex Wubbels was forcibly arrested by Salt Lake City Police Detective Jeff Payne after she refused to allow an illegal blood draw on an unconscious patient. The patient was an off-duty truck driver who had been involved in a head-on collision with a suspect fleeing from police. He was admitted to the hospital in a comatose state. Detective Payne sought the blood sample to check for illicit substances, despite the patient being a victim in the crash, not the suspect. Wubbels remained calm and presented the officer with the hospital's written policy—which had been agreed upon by the police department itself. She informed him that per the U.S. Supreme Court, a blood draw requires: A warrant. Patient consent. The patient to be under arrest. Since none of these conditions were met, Wubbels refused to comply. Detective Payne responded by manhandling her, placing her in handcuffs, and dragging her to a patrol car while she screamed for help. While outside Detective Payne yelled at Wubbels saying how long he was doing this and how he knows the law. Detective Jeff Payne was fired from the Salt Lake City Police Department following an internal investigation. Lt. James Tracy, Payne’s supervisor who ordered the arrest, was demoted. Legal Settlement: Alex Wubbels received a $1.5 million settlement from Salt Lake City and the University of Utah. Great job by this nurse for standing her ground and refusing to violate the rights of her patient. Seems like the nurse understands the law better than the people enforcing it in this situation.

Giggling Ganon

199,243 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 DRIVING WHILE BLACK: Cop climbs into car and beats Black driver for asking to speak to a supervisor. Craig Manning says he was racially targeted during a traffic stop. He made a LEGAL left turn, got pulled over, and asked to speak to a supervisor before handing over his license or exiting the vehicle. Dashcam footage shows an officer climbing into his car and punching him several times in the face and head. He was charged with traffic violations and resisting arrest. He’s now planning to sue Suffolk County Police and the officers. His attorneys say it was because he’s Black and note he had the camera installed out of fear of “driving while Black.” Another case of police using fists on a Black driver who simply wanted basic rights. How many more Black men have to get beaten on camera before these cops face real consequences?

🚨 DRIVING WHILE BLACK: Cop climbs into car and beats Black driver for asking to speak to a supervisor. Craig Manning says he was racially targeted during a traffic stop. He made a LEGAL left turn, got pulled over, and asked to speak to a supervisor before handing over his license or exiting the vehicle. Dashcam footage shows an officer climbing into his car and punching him several times in the face and head. He was charged with traffic violations and resisting arrest. He’s now planning to sue Suffolk County Police and the officers. His attorneys say it was because he’s Black and note he had the camera installed out of fear of “driving while Black.” Another case of police using fists on a Black driver who simply wanted basic rights. How many more Black men have to get beaten on camera before these cops face real consequences?

i Expose Violent Criminals

184,160 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WHY ARE THE POLICE SCARED OF CAMERA 📸? A resident in Abuja reported an incident of police harassment. The individual was picked up by their brothers from the Idu train station, and on their way home to Lugbe, they were stopped by police officers who demanded documents and questioned their occupation. After providing the necessary information, the police insisted on taking them to the station. When the individual and their companions refused, the officers allegedly began assaulting them, handcuffing them, and eventually took their car and two friends to the station, even damaging the car's windshield. @Jossy_Dannyking FCT POLICE COMMAND POLICE COMPLAINT

WHY ARE THE POLICE SCARED OF CAMERA 📸? A resident in Abuja reported an incident of police harassment. The individual was picked up by their brothers from the Idu train station, and on their way home to Lugbe, they were stopped by police officers who demanded documents and questioned their occupation. After providing the necessary information, the police insisted on taking them to the station. When the individual and their companions refused, the officers allegedly began assaulting them, handcuffing them, and eventually took their car and two friends to the station, even damaging the car's windshield. @Jossy_Dannyking FCT POLICE COMMAND POLICE COMPLAINT

Harrison Gwamnishu

156,428 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Samora Machel police station, Philippi: A man was struck in the head by a woman with a beer bottle. Instead of settling the score himself, he went to the police to press charges. What he got instead was mockery. Officers at the station laughed him off, treating his complaint like a joke. When he pulled out his phone to record the farce, they simply walked away, leaving him standing there. One officer even slumped into a chair and started scrolling on his phone, as if the whole thing had never happened. 🥲

Samora Machel police station, Philippi: A man was struck in the head by a woman with a beer bottle. Instead of settling the score himself, he went to the police to press charges. What he got instead was mockery. Officers at the station laughed him off, treating his complaint like a joke. When he pulled out his phone to record the farce, they simply walked away, leaving him standing there. One officer even slumped into a chair and started scrolling on his phone, as if the whole thing had never happened. 🥲

GALAXY-2:20 VIDEO🔌

133,285 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

🚨An Anti-ICE Gestapo conspired to impede our right to move freely on public property at an ICE Out protest in Philadelphia. When we arrived at the protest happening at City Hall, two men wearing armbands approached us. One claimed to have “security clearances” to keep me from entering the protest, which was being held on public property. We asked if the police department gave him permission to do this, and he confirmed that he did not have clearance from the Philadelphia Police Department to stop me from entering. We then asked for his name and what organization he was acting on behalf of, but he refused to answer. As we entered the protest the two men became four. After one of the men invaded our personal space, we informed all four of them that what they were doing was unconstitutional and illegal. This seemed to make them uncomfortable. Unfortunately later in the protest, our phone and microphone was stolen by an ANTIFA agitator while we covered the demonstration further. With many violations of the law being documented at these events, our question is this: Should these protests be considered unlawful gatherings?

🚨An Anti-ICE Gestapo conspired to impede our right to move freely on public property at an ICE Out protest in Philadelphia. When we arrived at the protest happening at City Hall, two men wearing armbands approached us. One claimed to have “security clearances” to keep me from entering the protest, which was being held on public property. We asked if the police department gave him permission to do this, and he confirmed that he did not have clearance from the Philadelphia Police Department to stop me from entering. We then asked for his name and what organization he was acting on behalf of, but he refused to answer. As we entered the protest the two men became four. After one of the men invaded our personal space, we informed all four of them that what they were doing was unconstitutional and illegal. This seemed to make them uncomfortable. Unfortunately later in the protest, our phone and microphone was stolen by an ANTIFA agitator while we covered the demonstration further. With many violations of the law being documented at these events, our question is this: Should these protests be considered unlawful gatherings?

SurgePhilly

254,376 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten