Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Can Andy Burnham control public spending? That is the question markets are asking this week as UK government borrowing costs hit an 18 year high. It’s a global bond rout with a UK risk premium. It’s why I pressed government minister, Douglas Alexander, so hard on whether Labour has...

50,680 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

25 Comments

Sheff 🇬🇧 🦉's profile picture
Sheff 🇬🇧 🦉10 days ago

Answer = NO. So he will lie about everything like Starmer

Norman Bagley's profile picture
Norman Bagley10 days ago

Wee Dougie came up with his usual word salad, pathetic

Jonny Jarre's profile picture
Jonny Jarre9 days ago

@TomTugendhat A global phenomenon it may be, but what is irrefutable is that the UK is being hit the hardest, due to our levels of debt, ownership of that debt & the market’s belief that we are not serious about taking the tough decisions required. He must cut welfare & create growth. NOW.

Lunacia 🤪's profile picture
Lunacia 🤪9 days ago

Fucking word salad as per usual. He didn’t answer anything

Abbie W's profile picture
Abbie W9 days ago

Labour has been in power for 2+ years. When do they plan to quit blaming the past and actually start governing? If they have done all of the wonderful, magical things, why is nothing working?

Samera's profile picture
Samera10 days ago

No he doesn’t seem to be showing signs he can do that unfortunately. All he looks to be able to do is spend money without any source of funds…

Poston's profile picture
Poston10 days ago

So what he said was that Liz Kendall was useless and the Conservative party are to blame even though they have no power.

Rob D's profile picture
Rob D9 days ago

He tried his usual patronising man-splainy type of response. And fell flat on his face. Woeful. It’s vital you keep pressing them on this. A fiscal day of reckoning is coming. We have to cut spending.

RiotGranny's profile picture
RiotGranny9 days ago

It’s a revolving door, this paying companies to employ people will not create jobs ! It’s here have a job for 6 months and then back on the scrap heap. You need to find investment in jobs stop importing goods and push for made in Britain companies

Tom Wilkins's profile picture
Tom Wilkins10 days ago

Another Tory with amnesia… have you forgotten was has caused the biggest rise in borrowing costs in the last five years?

Stuart Hill's profile picture
Stuart Hill8 days ago

He’s right on the fact that borrowing for all countries has gone up that part of his statement is correct. But Britain’s borrowing has gone up higher than anybody else’s including Japan and Japan’s debt ratio is 204% of GDP and yeah it’s borrowing is for less than that in the uk

Tim Veiro's profile picture
Tim Veiro10 days ago

@TomTugendhat You’ll never win an argument with this pompous arragonst no it all twerp.

Thebitterestpill's profile picture
Thebitterestpill9 days ago

serving bog-eyed billy arse on a plate

Fin de Lacy's profile picture
Fin de Lacy9 days ago

The Government’s NUMBER ONE policy with no cap,control or bounds towards criminality …physical and mental harm money laundering tax evasion sexual abuse human trafficking tax rebates and avoidance unregistered business practicing and human rights abuses and it’s near normalised.

John waller's profile picture
John waller7 days ago

Another deluded clown 🤡

bammo's profile picture
bammo9 days ago

Well said Julia

James Parker's profile picture
James Parker7 days ago

That was glorious, Julia. They have no idea what they’re doing. And they know they have no idea.

Steerpike's profile picture
Steerpike9 days ago

He's a complete idiot

D Ola's profile picture
D Ola9 days ago

Talking over someone does not make your argument valid!

Alfons United's profile picture
Alfons United9 days ago

@TomTugendhat Absolute waffling wanker.

AJ's profile picture
AJ9 days ago

Can MPs control their spending? Can the Royal Family control their spending? Are you not supposed to lead by example?

safc66's profile picture
safc668 days ago

Answer the Fcuking question

Frank Obrien's profile picture
Frank Obrien9 days ago

What a complete devious spin cunt

Eleanor Ratcliffe's profile picture
Eleanor Ratcliffe7 days ago

BS economy is non existence, you only have to look at the state of the stock markets. No real growth at all . Typical Labour cannot even answer a straight answer .

Scottie's profile picture
Scottie9 days ago

You know … Its really not worth talking to someone that’s thick

Related Videos

EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Reeves has proposed increasing defence spending by less than £10 billion over the next four years despite stark warnings that Britain’s “national security and safety is in peril” The chancellor has outlined plans with the prime minister for a “limited” increase amid concern about the impact of the Iran war on the public finances The armed forces have warned that they are facing a funding gap of around £28 billion over the next four years on their existing plans However a government source said that Reeves has proposed an increase in funding of less than £10 billion during her discussions with Sir Keir Starmer, fearing a bigger increase would be unaffordable The Iran war has pushed up the cost of government borrowing and households face higher energy bills, petrol costs and prices in shops The chancellor is drawing up plans for a targeted energy bill bailout for low-income households this winter and is also expected to shelve plans to begin increasing fuel duty by 5p a litre from September at a cost of about £2.6 billion. Both measures will add to pressure on the public finances The State of It political podcast from The Times and The Sunday Times has been told that Reeves is unwilling to break her fiscal rules or increase taxes to boost defence spending John Healey, the defence secretary, is pressing for a bigger increase as there are concerns that £10 billion will not be enough, given the increasing likelihood that British forces will be deployed to Ukraine and the Middle East

Steven Swinford

42,545 views • 5 months ago

This week's episode of our podcast The State of It with the brilliant Lara Spirit * Inside the bitter Cabinet splits over the defence investment plan - why nobody is happy * Sir Keir Starmer is expected to announce a £13.5billion increase in defence spending - far less than previously considered * John Healey, the defence secretary, has warned that this will not be enough and that it risks undermining our credibility in Nato. Defence chiefs had originally asked for £28billion * The Treasury is also said to be pushing for a "planning assumption" that Britain will only meet its target of spending 3 per cent of GDP on defence up from current levels of 2.3 per cent in 2034/35. Healey is concerned that this is not soon enough, given the scale of the threat Britain faces, and has so far refused to sign it off * Talks are going down to the wire. The launch of the Defence Investment Plan was planned for Friday but it could easily be delayed yet again * The defence chiefs are deeply unhappy. They are concerned that the money on the table will not be enough to fund key projects. There's a feeling they have largely been kept in the dark * Reeves is deeply frustrated by the process - the fact she is having to effectively reopen the spending review process to find the money. Her intervention at an investor conference yesterday - warning of need for tax rises to fund defence - was particularly significant * Then there's the bigger political picture - what if Burnham wins Makerfield, becomes PM and takes a different view? By that stage you could have a new PM, a new chancellor and a new defence secretary. Worth remembering that there are significant cuts to DfT capital budgets and net zero projects to help fund the DIP * Latest from Makerfield: Burnham allies are increasingly confident he will win the by-election. They think Restore UK is a factor that will divide the vote on the right. Restore is targeting female voters in particular * The big question - if Burnham wins Makerfield when does he make his move? Allies suggesting he is likely to go sooner than later * The prospect of an orderly transition appears unlikely - Starmer said to think Burnham's manoeuvres are 'unforgivable' - there is mutual enmity between the two men which goes back for years * Will Starmer stand and fight? He insists he will. But we have seen this before with Boris Johnson and even Liz Truss insisting they would fight on and then going. But Starmer is a different character * If there is a leadership contest where does that leave Labour? It means we will have weeks of internal arguments and a 'battle of ideas' in the run-up to a hugely challenging cost of living crisis this winter...

Steven Swinford

16,238 views • 3 months ago