Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Cancer Is Largely Preventable—Here’s the Science-Backed Solution For decades, we’ve been told cancer is a genetic disease—inescapable, unpredictable, a roll of the dice. But what if that’s wrong? Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher, reveals a paradigm-shifting truth: Cancer is a metabolic disease, fueled by the very foods...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

455,866 subscribers

290,791 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇
0:59

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇

Camus

325,004 views • 5 months ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "Cancer is very preventable... we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet & lifestyle." He flips the script: Cancer isn't primarily genetic—it's a metabolic disease rooted in damaged mitochondria forcing cells to ferment glucose and glutamine for energy. Key points from the clip: - Higher blood sugar = faster tumor growth (his early research showed this clearly). - Cancer cells rely on glucose + glutamine (they have faulty mitochondria). - Solution? Restrict both fuels via low-carb/ketogenic diet + fasting → enter nutritional ketosis. - Healthy cells thrive on ketone bodies; tumors starve slowly, lose blood supply, and get dissolved by the body. Non-toxic management potential: Target metabolism instead of (or alongside) traditional treatments. (Backed by his decades of work, including case studies & animal models on restricted ketogenic approaches—though mainstream oncology debates it as adjunct, not cure-all.) Mind-blowing rethink: What if prevention starts with blood sugar control and ditching high-carb lifestyles? Have you explored keto/fasting for health reasons? Seen any personal changes—or know someone who's tried metabolic approaches? Share experiences respectfully below!
0:56

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "Cancer is very preventable... we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet & lifestyle." He flips the script: Cancer isn't primarily genetic—it's a metabolic disease rooted in damaged mitochondria forcing cells to ferment glucose and glutamine for energy. Key points from the clip: - Higher blood sugar = faster tumor growth (his early research showed this clearly). - Cancer cells rely on glucose + glutamine (they have faulty mitochondria). - Solution? Restrict both fuels via low-carb/ketogenic diet + fasting → enter nutritional ketosis. - Healthy cells thrive on ketone bodies; tumors starve slowly, lose blood supply, and get dissolved by the body. Non-toxic management potential: Target metabolism instead of (or alongside) traditional treatments. (Backed by his decades of work, including case studies & animal models on restricted ketogenic approaches—though mainstream oncology debates it as adjunct, not cure-all.) Mind-blowing rethink: What if prevention starts with blood sugar control and ditching high-carb lifestyles? Have you explored keto/fasting for health reasons? Seen any personal changes—or know someone who's tried metabolic approaches? Share experiences respectfully below!

Camus

65,965 views • 6 months ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried says "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower your blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows. Undeniable." He says the way to manage cancer without toxicity is to simultaneously restrict the two fuels cancer needs to grow: Glucose and Glutamine. The good news is there's a fuel that we can use very efficiently and cancer cannot: ketones. How do you make ketones? Consume little or no carbs and fast. Glutamine can be managed with drugs. To be fair, mainstream oncology disputes Seyfried's metabolic approach, instead relying on expensive chemotherapy that can run $100,000+ per year instead of glutamine restriction, a low carb diet and fasting.
1:00

Dr. Thomas Seyfried says "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower your blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows. Undeniable." He says the way to manage cancer without toxicity is to simultaneously restrict the two fuels cancer needs to grow: Glucose and Glutamine. The good news is there's a fuel that we can use very efficiently and cancer cannot: ketones. How do you make ketones? Consume little or no carbs and fast. Glutamine can be managed with drugs. To be fair, mainstream oncology disputes Seyfried's metabolic approach, instead relying on expensive chemotherapy that can run $100,000+ per year instead of glutamine restriction, a low carb diet and fasting.

Cary Kelly

27,219 views • 4 months ago

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.
0:59

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.

Camus

275,027 views • 8 months ago

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.
4:33

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.

Camus

59,563 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried: "Cancer is very preventable. It's just that we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet and lifestyle." "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower the blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows." "They're dependent on glucose and glutamine. We can replace glucose and glutamine with ketone bodies." "They slowly start to die, and the body comes in and dissolves them."
0:59

Dr. Thomas Seyfried: "Cancer is very preventable. It's just that we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet and lifestyle." "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower the blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows." "They're dependent on glucose and glutamine. We can replace glucose and glutamine with ketone bodies." "They slowly start to die, and the body comes in and dissolves them."

Red Pill Dispenser

45,515 views • 7 months ago

Ketosis Is The Key To Defeat Cancer! "We, as a species, evolved to be in Nutritional Ketosis for the majority of our existence." Dr. Thomas Seyfried "Cancer depends on Glucose & Glutamine, when those fuels are removed, cancer leaves." "Transition the body off of the fuels that cancer uses & onto ketones & fatty acids." "We selectively marginalize the tumor cells over time. They slowly start to die, the blood vessels disappear & the body comes in & dissolves them." "Our ancestors were always in a state of nutritional ketosis, because there were very few carbohydrates for them to be consuming." "Water fasting & a low carbohydrate diet will produce the ketones to starve the cancer." Full Podcast Diary of a CEO YouTube: Dr. Seyfried's Book:
1:27

Ketosis Is The Key To Defeat Cancer! "We, as a species, evolved to be in Nutritional Ketosis for the majority of our existence." Dr. Thomas Seyfried "Cancer depends on Glucose & Glutamine, when those fuels are removed, cancer leaves." "Transition the body off of the fuels that cancer uses & onto ketones & fatty acids." "We selectively marginalize the tumor cells over time. They slowly start to die, the blood vessels disappear & the body comes in & dissolves them." "Our ancestors were always in a state of nutritional ketosis, because there were very few carbohydrates for them to be consuming." "Water fasting & a low carbohydrate diet will produce the ketones to starve the cancer." Full Podcast Diary of a CEO YouTube: Dr. Seyfried's Book:

Valerie Anne Smith

358,189 views • 1 year ago

Cancer is “all a big money game, and it’s dollars first, patient outcome second.” Dr Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology “The current idea that cancer is a genetic disease is based on ideology—not on the science.” “Our American society... doesn’t care about prevention because if they did, there would be no obesity epidemic. But there is. So that tells us the society doesn’t really care about cancer prevention.” In Seyfried’s book, “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease,” he argues we should hit cancer where it hurts most by messing with its fuel supply, like using ketogenic diets to cut off the energy that cancer cells need. It’s a way of thinking about the disease that poses bad news to the profits of the cancer treatment industry.
2:46

Cancer is “all a big money game, and it’s dollars first, patient outcome second.” Dr Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology “The current idea that cancer is a genetic disease is based on ideology—not on the science.” “Our American society... doesn’t care about prevention because if they did, there would be no obesity epidemic. But there is. So that tells us the society doesn’t really care about cancer prevention.” In Seyfried’s book, “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease,” he argues we should hit cancer where it hurts most by messing with its fuel supply, like using ketogenic diets to cut off the energy that cancer cells need. It’s a way of thinking about the disease that poses bad news to the profits of the cancer treatment industry.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

618,845 views • 2 years ago

Cancer has a problem. It needs Glucose and Glutamine to survive. That's where anti parasitic's like Fenbendazole come in. "Cancer can not survive without the sugar Glucose or the amino acid Glutamine, which are the fermentation fuels" “Why would a parasite medication be effective in k*lling cancer? [because] the parasite and the cancer cells, use a common metabolic pathway, the glutaminolysis pathway”. Professor Thomas Seyfried from Boston College thinks that "Cancer cannot be a genetic disease" and mentions that the whole industry has been captured by more toxic treatments. He says what Doctors are learning about cancer is completely wrong. "The medical schools have not yet come to understand this unfortunately [and] many oncologists and physicians have never been trained to know that cancer is a metabolic disease"
3:04

Cancer has a problem. It needs Glucose and Glutamine to survive. That's where anti parasitic's like Fenbendazole come in. "Cancer can not survive without the sugar Glucose or the amino acid Glutamine, which are the fermentation fuels" “Why would a parasite medication be effective in k*lling cancer? [because] the parasite and the cancer cells, use a common metabolic pathway, the glutaminolysis pathway”. Professor Thomas Seyfried from Boston College thinks that "Cancer cannot be a genetic disease" and mentions that the whole industry has been captured by more toxic treatments. He says what Doctors are learning about cancer is completely wrong. "The medical schools have not yet come to understand this unfortunately [and] many oncologists and physicians have never been trained to know that cancer is a metabolic disease"

Humanspective

466,438 views • 9 months ago

New research reveals that parasite medications like mebendazole and fenbendazole—long ignored by Big Pharma—target the glutamine pathway in cancer cells, starving tumors just as they do parasites. These drugs are cheap, effective, and widely available—so what’s the catch? According to Dr. Thomas Seyfried, the real barrier isn’t science, but profit. Pharmaceutical companies have a playbook: take a 50-cent pill, prove it fights cancer, then hike the price to $300. Sound familiar? (Looking at you, Martin Shkreli.) The paradigm is shifting: cancer is a metabolic disease, not genetic. By understanding tumor metabolism and strategically combining drugs like 6-deoxynorleucine with existing therapies, we can outsmart cancer without bankrupting patients. But here’s the kicker: no one’s being trained to think this way. The system is stuck chasing mutations while ignoring the metabolic roots of the disease. The revolution is here—if we dare to embrace it.
2:10

New research reveals that parasite medications like mebendazole and fenbendazole—long ignored by Big Pharma—target the glutamine pathway in cancer cells, starving tumors just as they do parasites. These drugs are cheap, effective, and widely available—so what’s the catch? According to Dr. Thomas Seyfried, the real barrier isn’t science, but profit. Pharmaceutical companies have a playbook: take a 50-cent pill, prove it fights cancer, then hike the price to $300. Sound familiar? (Looking at you, Martin Shkreli.) The paradigm is shifting: cancer is a metabolic disease, not genetic. By understanding tumor metabolism and strategically combining drugs like 6-deoxynorleucine with existing therapies, we can outsmart cancer without bankrupting patients. But here’s the kicker: no one’s being trained to think this way. The system is stuck chasing mutations while ignoring the metabolic roots of the disease. The revolution is here—if we dare to embrace it.

Camus

508,933 views • 9 months ago

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood
1:00

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

198,205 views • 1 year ago

Dr Mark Hyman: Recent research suggests that a ketogenic diet may help starve cancer cells, which—unlike healthy human cells—rely exclusively on sugar for energy. "When you look at the growth of cancer cells, they feed on sugar." "We are like a hybrid engine. We can go electric or we can go gas. We can go carbs, we can go fat. Cancer only goes sugar. So you start with the sugar and you kill the cancer." "[Americans are consuming] about 152 pounds of sugar per person per year, and 133 pounds of flour... That's almost three quarters of a pound a day of sugar and flour." "And what that does is it fuels the cancer cells." Credit: Mark Hyman, M.D. Tucker Carlson
1:39

Dr Mark Hyman: Recent research suggests that a ketogenic diet may help starve cancer cells, which—unlike healthy human cells—rely exclusively on sugar for energy. "When you look at the growth of cancer cells, they feed on sugar." "We are like a hybrid engine. We can go electric or we can go gas. We can go carbs, we can go fat. Cancer only goes sugar. So you start with the sugar and you kill the cancer." "[Americans are consuming] about 152 pounds of sugar per person per year, and 133 pounds of flour... That's almost three quarters of a pound a day of sugar and flour." "And what that does is it fuels the cancer cells." Credit: Mark Hyman, M.D. Tucker Carlson

Wide Awake Media

96,162 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.
6:14

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.

Camus

74,454 views • 1 year ago

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8 percent of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68 percent survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?
0:48

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8 percent of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68 percent survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?

Epoch Health

17,628 views • 2 months ago

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8% of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68% survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?
0:48

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8% of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68% survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?

Epoch Health

13,091 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried reveals why parasite drugs like fenbendazole & mebendazole crush cancer cells: They target the exact same energy pathway that cancer cells hijack — fermentation of glucose and glutamine — the same pathway many parasites use once settled in tissue. Short science nugget: Fenbendazole and mebendazole disrupt microtubule formation and block glucose/glutamine uptake, starving cancer cells of their primary fuels while sparing healthy cells that rely more on oxidative phosphorylation (peer-reviewed in vitro & animal studies, e.g., Dogra et al. 2018, Zhang et al. 2021, and Seyfried lab publications) Key points from Seyfried: - Structurally almost identical → likely equally effective - Cancer is not a parasite, but it metabolizes like one - These drugs don’t care — they hit the shared vulnerability Cocktails of them may work even better. Is this the overlooked cancer weapon big pharma ignores? Have you or someone you know explored benzimidazoles like fenbendazole/mebendazole?
2:11

Dr. Thomas Seyfried reveals why parasite drugs like fenbendazole & mebendazole crush cancer cells: They target the exact same energy pathway that cancer cells hijack — fermentation of glucose and glutamine — the same pathway many parasites use once settled in tissue. Short science nugget: Fenbendazole and mebendazole disrupt microtubule formation and block glucose/glutamine uptake, starving cancer cells of their primary fuels while sparing healthy cells that rely more on oxidative phosphorylation (peer-reviewed in vitro & animal studies, e.g., Dogra et al. 2018, Zhang et al. 2021, and Seyfried lab publications) Key points from Seyfried: - Structurally almost identical → likely equally effective - Cancer is not a parasite, but it metabolizes like one - These drugs don’t care — they hit the shared vulnerability Cocktails of them may work even better. Is this the overlooked cancer weapon big pharma ignores? Have you or someone you know explored benzimidazoles like fenbendazole/mebendazole?

Camus

88,248 views • 5 months ago

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.
1:47

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

TheLiverDoc™

193,453 views • 7 months ago

🚨Dr. Thomas Seyfried reveals a stunning connection: Parasite drugs fenbendazole & mebendazole kill cancer—both cancer cells & parasites rely on identical energy of glucose & glutamine. These drugs disrupt that pathway exactly the same, starving tumors just like they do worms. This is why we are seeing remarkable outcomes in research with these so-called "dog dewormers." Are you or someone you love ready to consider anti-parasite treatments for cancer, or does it sound too out there? Dr Thomas Seyfried 'Press-Pulse Cancer Therapy Protocol' Is Linked Below...
2:11

🚨Dr. Thomas Seyfried reveals a stunning connection: Parasite drugs fenbendazole & mebendazole kill cancer—both cancer cells & parasites rely on identical energy of glucose & glutamine. These drugs disrupt that pathway exactly the same, starving tumors just like they do worms. This is why we are seeing remarkable outcomes in research with these so-called "dog dewormers." Are you or someone you love ready to consider anti-parasite treatments for cancer, or does it sound too out there? Dr Thomas Seyfried 'Press-Pulse Cancer Therapy Protocol' Is Linked Below...

Valerie Anne Smith

18,350 views • 7 months ago