Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Candace's struggle session yesterday was pretty embarrassing. The entire purpose of the space was to answer why the Fort Huachuca story mattered, which Harrison Smith asked multiple times and never got an answer. Anyway, here's Candace Owens from October 9th admitting Charlie's neck did stop the bullet, "WITHOUT QUESTION,...

AshtonForbes's profile picture

Ashton Forbes

301,941 subscribers

369,605 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....
0:53

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

27,538 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

BREAKING: Candace Owens confirms Charlie Kirk's neck "did indeed stop the bullet." "I'm telling you 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit." She then reveals only a fragment of the bullet was recovered from the back Charlie's neck.
1:15

BREAKING: Candace Owens confirms Charlie Kirk's neck "did indeed stop the bullet." "I'm telling you 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit." She then reveals only a fragment of the bullet was recovered from the back Charlie's neck.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

186,922 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

HOLY SH*T! 🚨 100% CONFIRMED - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT… AND IT WASN’T THE GUN THEY TOLD US 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “Charlie’s neck did indeed stop the bullet. Without question. 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. A fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd 6. There is not one reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate. Hunters rejoice. You guys were right. It means he was shot with a completely different gun.”
3:29

HOLY SH*T! 🚨 100% CONFIRMED - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT… AND IT WASN’T THE GUN THEY TOLD US 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “Charlie’s neck did indeed stop the bullet. Without question. 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. A fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd 6. There is not one reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate. Hunters rejoice. You guys were right. It means he was shot with a completely different gun.”

HustleBitch

4,126,702 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens
6:43

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Candace Owens mocked that, in the latest defamation lawsuit against her, Brian Harpole said he didn’t give her an alibi in December for the absurd claim he was at Fort Huachuca military base the day before Charlie Kirk died - because he didn’t want Candace to engagement farm off his response. Which is EXACTLY what she did. To Erika Kirk and others when they provided alibis for this exact wild claim. Even holding an X Space where she titled it "Fort Huachuca: Why it suddenly matters" - because people had provided alibis. Candace now claims that if Harpole had simply given her an alibi, she would have let the entire thing go. The COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what she actually did. In that Space, she directly argues that providing an alibi proves guilt. And says that if Erika and others hadn’t responded, she would have dropped it - Which is exactly what Harpole did. As always zero consistency. Entirely BS. These kinds of games won't fly in court.
1:07

Candace Owens mocked that, in the latest defamation lawsuit against her, Brian Harpole said he didn’t give her an alibi in December for the absurd claim he was at Fort Huachuca military base the day before Charlie Kirk died - because he didn’t want Candace to engagement farm off his response. Which is EXACTLY what she did. To Erika Kirk and others when they provided alibis for this exact wild claim. Even holding an X Space where she titled it "Fort Huachuca: Why it suddenly matters" - because people had provided alibis. Candace now claims that if Harpole had simply given her an alibi, she would have let the entire thing go. The COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what she actually did. In that Space, she directly argues that providing an alibi proves guilt. And says that if Erika and others hadn’t responded, she would have dropped it - Which is exactly what Harpole did. As always zero consistency. Entirely BS. These kinds of games won't fly in court.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

94,851 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Candace Owens Issues FULL RETRACTION! She now CONFIRMS Charlie Kirk's neck DID stop the bullet, and part of the bullet was recovered. She admits he was shot from the front. Hilarious face saving attempt by Candace and total annihilation for the schizos. They're so dumbfounded, they think the video is AI. Next she'll be saying the shooter was always Tyler Robinson, she never insinuated anything else! You may now fill out your Ashton Forbes apology forms.
2:22

Candace Owens Issues FULL RETRACTION! She now CONFIRMS Charlie Kirk's neck DID stop the bullet, and part of the bullet was recovered. She admits he was shot from the front. Hilarious face saving attempt by Candace and total annihilation for the schizos. They're so dumbfounded, they think the video is AI. Next she'll be saying the shooter was always Tyler Robinson, she never insinuated anything else! You may now fill out your Ashton Forbes apology forms.

Ashton Forbes

440,081 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

I was doing an interview recently where I was asked how I would answer some of the top questions from gen Z and millennials. Top of the list, “prove to me God exists!” Here’s the angle I took on the question.
1:53

I was doing an interview recently where I was asked how I would answer some of the top questions from gen Z and millennials. Top of the list, “prove to me God exists!” Here’s the angle I took on the question.

Wes Huff

88,644 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

LMAO I’m not a TPUSA spokesman. I’m not paid by them. Not controlled or directed by anyone. I have zero affiliation with TPUSA or any other organization or entity and have never received money from anyone. You’re coping. Ive explained at length why my view changed on the 30-06 not exiting. Its called research. MLK, Chuck Ritter, and Shane Hill. All shot with 30-06 from closer range than Charlie and not one had an exit wound. That picture is an alibi for Erika whether you accept it or not. She was never at Ft Huachuca. I’ve never lied. Candace has lied dozens of times. You suffer from self induced cognitive dissonance. Remember when Candace Owens said “Charlie’s neck DID STOP THE BULLET… without question.”? She confirmed with multiple sources. Who paid her to flip? 👇
0:51

LMAO I’m not a TPUSA spokesman. I’m not paid by them. Not controlled or directed by anyone. I have zero affiliation with TPUSA or any other organization or entity and have never received money from anyone. You’re coping. Ive explained at length why my view changed on the 30-06 not exiting. Its called research. MLK, Chuck Ritter, and Shane Hill. All shot with 30-06 from closer range than Charlie and not one had an exit wound. That picture is an alibi for Erika whether you accept it or not. She was never at Ft Huachuca. I’ve never lied. Candace has lied dozens of times. You suffer from self induced cognitive dissonance. Remember when Candace Owens said “Charlie’s neck DID STOP THE BULLET… without question.”? She confirmed with multiple sources. Who paid her to flip? 👇

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

38,357 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Candace Owens attempted to pull off the MOST RIDICULOUS double down of all time on today’s show !!! Her Fort Huachuca story has completely FALLEN APART right before our eyes. But instead of letting it go… Candace had a BRIGHT idea 💡 The idea !? Now that everyone Mitch claimed to see has provided an alibi to prove they weren’t there… Candace is REPLACING them with people who she says look the same. So when one person DEBUNKS her and provides PROOF they weren’t at Fort Huachuca she just blames an entirely new person linked to TPUSA for being at Fort Huachuca. AND OF COURSE… Her fake “whistleblower” is all the way on board. All she has to do is send him a picture and SUDDENLY HE REMEMBERS also seeing that person at Fort Huachuca. It’s all so obviously FAKE and ridiculous. But this is the BEST she could come up with in the two weeks she took off from her show.
0:39

Candace Owens attempted to pull off the MOST RIDICULOUS double down of all time on today’s show !!! Her Fort Huachuca story has completely FALLEN APART right before our eyes. But instead of letting it go… Candace had a BRIGHT idea 💡 The idea !? Now that everyone Mitch claimed to see has provided an alibi to prove they weren’t there… Candace is REPLACING them with people who she says look the same. So when one person DEBUNKS her and provides PROOF they weren’t at Fort Huachuca she just blames an entirely new person linked to TPUSA for being at Fort Huachuca. AND OF COURSE… Her fake “whistleblower” is all the way on board. All she has to do is send him a picture and SUDDENLY HE REMEMBERS also seeing that person at Fort Huachuca. It’s all so obviously FAKE and ridiculous. But this is the BEST she could come up with in the two weeks she took off from her show.

Cinema Shogun

50,040 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

.Candace Owens has repeatedly used the Fort Huachuca story to claim and insinuate that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, TPUSA, Cabot Phillips, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he wouldn’t witness this top-secret assassination meeting at Fort Huachuca. She promoted it by saying: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." "It feels like today will be the day that the government can no longer deny it." "A story from a man in the military that is about to blow this case open." On her show, she went further: "I just cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military's involvement in his assassination." That entire narrative rests solely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a court-documented pathological liar—and was sold as a pre-assassination meeting involving the U.S. military, Charlie’s wife, his head of security, his colleagues, and a sitting member of Congress. Yesterday, when Harrison H. Smith ✞ asked a simple question—why does Fort Huachuca matter, and what is the actual claim?—Candace suddenly shifted. Instead of standing by the accusation, she argued it “matters” because Brian Harpole gave an alibi and “acted weird,” citing vague suspicions, while refusing to say whether it was an assassination meeting at all. "It matters because why would Brian Harpole be at Fort Huachuca at all? It matters because he's giving an alibi which means he doesn't want to be associated... Like I said, Brian Harpole was acting funny. He's been acting weird. He cared enough to present an alibi, meaning he didn't want people to think he was there, right? So if you have to, if you have to give someone an alibi, is because you don't want people to think that you're there. Is an alibi is not needed if there's nothing to hide. So that's why I think that's why it matters." When pressed again on Erika Kirk’s involvement, Candace deflected—saying Erika wasn’t there that day (but was there the day before), insisting it’s not about conclusions, only “following lies” and “not normal reactions,” and admitting she “cannot definitely say” it was an assassination meeting. But Candace herself opened this story by declaring: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." You don’t get to accuse the U.S. military of murder, name Charlie's loved ones as participants in this top secret assassination planning meeting, hype an imminent government confession—and then retreat into "I’m just asking questions" and "why is he giving an alibi?" This is unhinged, baseless slander followed by gaslighting—built entirely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a child-kidnapping, women-abusing, court-documented pathological liar, whose story Candace incentivized with a $141,000 GiveSendGo campaign.
9:40

.Candace Owens has repeatedly used the Fort Huachuca story to claim and insinuate that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, TPUSA, Cabot Phillips, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he wouldn’t witness this top-secret assassination meeting at Fort Huachuca. She promoted it by saying: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." "It feels like today will be the day that the government can no longer deny it." "A story from a man in the military that is about to blow this case open." On her show, she went further: "I just cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military's involvement in his assassination." That entire narrative rests solely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a court-documented pathological liar—and was sold as a pre-assassination meeting involving the U.S. military, Charlie’s wife, his head of security, his colleagues, and a sitting member of Congress. Yesterday, when Harrison H. Smith ✞ asked a simple question—why does Fort Huachuca matter, and what is the actual claim?—Candace suddenly shifted. Instead of standing by the accusation, she argued it “matters” because Brian Harpole gave an alibi and “acted weird,” citing vague suspicions, while refusing to say whether it was an assassination meeting at all. "It matters because why would Brian Harpole be at Fort Huachuca at all? It matters because he's giving an alibi which means he doesn't want to be associated... Like I said, Brian Harpole was acting funny. He's been acting weird. He cared enough to present an alibi, meaning he didn't want people to think he was there, right? So if you have to, if you have to give someone an alibi, is because you don't want people to think that you're there. Is an alibi is not needed if there's nothing to hide. So that's why I think that's why it matters." When pressed again on Erika Kirk’s involvement, Candace deflected—saying Erika wasn’t there that day (but was there the day before), insisting it’s not about conclusions, only “following lies” and “not normal reactions,” and admitting she “cannot definitely say” it was an assassination meeting. But Candace herself opened this story by declaring: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." You don’t get to accuse the U.S. military of murder, name Charlie's loved ones as participants in this top secret assassination planning meeting, hype an imminent government confession—and then retreat into "I’m just asking questions" and "why is he giving an alibi?" This is unhinged, baseless slander followed by gaslighting—built entirely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a child-kidnapping, women-abusing, court-documented pathological liar, whose story Candace incentivized with a $141,000 GiveSendGo campaign.

KanekoaTheGreat

348,825 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I upload the Heritage Foundation's entire voter fraud database to Claude and asked it to determine how many cases of voter fraud the Save Act would have prevented over the last 44 years. The answer was 51. Here's what else I found.
16:21

I upload the Heritage Foundation's entire voter fraud database to Claude and asked it to determine how many cases of voter fraud the Save Act would have prevented over the last 44 years. The answer was 51. Here's what else I found.

Machine Pun Kelly 🇺🇦

28,752 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🔥 CANDACE ANNIHILATED 🔥 Candace Owens just got CAUGHT spreading LIES once again !!! Her Fort Huachuca theory just got COOKED 🔥 and her fans are coping hard. Her FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER Mitch claimed he saw Congressman Amodei at a TOP SECRET military meeting at Fort Huachuca. WELL GUESS WHAT !?!? During the time of this FAKE meeting that Candace’s “whistleblower” totally made up Congressman Amodei was in Washington D.C. literally on camera voting on the house floor. Now even some of Candace’s BIGGEST SIMPS have had to admit that her Fort Huachuca theory is completely FALLING apart. It’s hilarious to watch this play out.
5:55

🔥 CANDACE ANNIHILATED 🔥 Candace Owens just got CAUGHT spreading LIES once again !!! Her Fort Huachuca theory just got COOKED 🔥 and her fans are coping hard. Her FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER Mitch claimed he saw Congressman Amodei at a TOP SECRET military meeting at Fort Huachuca. WELL GUESS WHAT !?!? During the time of this FAKE meeting that Candace’s “whistleblower” totally made up Congressman Amodei was in Washington D.C. literally on camera voting on the house floor. Now even some of Candace’s BIGGEST SIMPS have had to admit that her Fort Huachuca theory is completely FALLING apart. It’s hilarious to watch this play out.

Cinema Shogun

38,393 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Candace Owens says she doesn't yet trust the "alibi" Erika Kirk provided about where Erika was on September 8th because the contact name she had for Charlie is blacked out. Justin Streiff of TPUSA provided a conversation to Candace where Erika and Charlie were allegedly talking about what she was going to make for dinner at the time Mitch Snow says he allegedly saw her at the Fort Huachuca hotel lobby. Reminder, 2/4 others that Mitch Snow claimed with 95-99% certainty provided indisputable alibis that they were NOT at Fort Huachuca or the hotel Mitch says. The hotel Mitch believes he saw Erika Kirk at does not have her staying there in their records. I actually encourage you all to call the hotel and ask yourselves, so you don't have to believe me. Candace also wanted to clarify that she personally "never demanded" an alibi from Erika Kirk, although her fans believe she is guilty. Candace maintained throughout her episode today that she "now very much believes" the Fort Huachuca story is valid and that "something happened" there.
3:07

Candace Owens says she doesn't yet trust the "alibi" Erika Kirk provided about where Erika was on September 8th because the contact name she had for Charlie is blacked out. Justin Streiff of TPUSA provided a conversation to Candace where Erika and Charlie were allegedly talking about what she was going to make for dinner at the time Mitch Snow says he allegedly saw her at the Fort Huachuca hotel lobby. Reminder, 2/4 others that Mitch Snow claimed with 95-99% certainty provided indisputable alibis that they were NOT at Fort Huachuca or the hotel Mitch says. The hotel Mitch believes he saw Erika Kirk at does not have her staying there in their records. I actually encourage you all to call the hotel and ask yourselves, so you don't have to believe me. Candace also wanted to clarify that she personally "never demanded" an alibi from Erika Kirk, although her fans believe she is guilty. Candace maintained throughout her episode today that she "now very much believes" the Fort Huachuca story is valid and that "something happened" there.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

126,217 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I’m going to post a video of Kamala Harris and her moronic takes every day until the election. Kamala was asked point blank about inflation and how the “Build Back Better” plan was going to be funded. She managed to answer the question without ever answering. - 2021
3:58

I’m going to post a video of Kamala Harris and her moronic takes every day until the election. Kamala was asked point blank about inflation and how the “Build Back Better” plan was going to be funded. She managed to answer the question without ever answering. - 2021

Sarah Fields

48,126 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Candace Owens has no humanity left in her. After a minutes long tirade about which plane Erika Kirk flew on the day Charlie was murdered. Candace says..... "it was just enough time for everyone to have a little cry" A little cry? That's how she describes Erika and Charlie's friends mourning the loss of Charlie just hours after he was killed.
1:12

Candace Owens has no humanity left in her. After a minutes long tirade about which plane Erika Kirk flew on the day Charlie was murdered. Candace says..... "it was just enough time for everyone to have a little cry" A little cry? That's how she describes Erika and Charlie's friends mourning the loss of Charlie just hours after he was killed.

J

21,467 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 CANDACE OWENS TIGHTENS THE TIMELINE ON SEPT 8TH: Erika Kirk MIA – Charlie Alone with Kids, No Alibi, Mitch Snow's Fort Huachuca Sighting Vindicated?! 💥👀 Tonight on Candace Owens podcast all the PUZZLE PIECES are snapping together. Candace just exposed the gaping holes in Erika Kirk's story around Charlie Kirk's final days. Candace dives deep: "Now we've learned more about Erica... the Fort Huachuca story. I'm leaning towards Mitch." September 8th timeline? TIGHTENING UP—Charlie was HOME watching the Chicago Bears game, screaming at his TV (waking Gigi), detailing plays like the Noah Sewell fumble. Candace's take: "Charlie was the parent that night... he was at home alone with the kids." Why? If Erika was there, he wouldn't be solo-dadding! Candace then questions Frank Turek's truthfulness. He claims Charlie had "dinner with the family" but NEVER mentions Erika. Candace: "I think Frank Turek was with Charlie... but I just don't buy that he was just suddenly in need of so much debate help." Crisis mode? Charlie consulted a rabbi, pastor (Turek?), priest in 48 hours—something BIG brewing. And that "angry" photo of Charlie looking off-screen during Ingram Angle? Likely Turek there, not Erika. NO ONE confirms seeing Erika on Sept 8th—neighbors know the family, spot the kids, but Erika? Ghost. "Nobody yet... an APB for September 8th for Erica Kirk." She pretends not to "understand instructions" for alibi proof—texts with Charlie? Unverified, could be faked. Erika's claim: Home at 5:24 PM making dinner? Lies—timeline shows Charlie parenting solo. This SCREAMS Mitch Snow was RIGHT: Saw Erika at Fort Huachuca on the 8th. "My spidey senses are telling me that Erica was not there on the 8th." Cover-up? Aggressive attacks when mentioned—we were "holding that back," but vibes say she was AWOL. All pieces aligning: Erika's pathological lies, no alibi—betrayal exposed. Charlie's legacy demands truth! FOLLOW Candace Owens, watch her FULL episode and RT if this timeline chills you. Candace is unraveling the web in real time!
10:25

🚨 CANDACE OWENS TIGHTENS THE TIMELINE ON SEPT 8TH: Erika Kirk MIA – Charlie Alone with Kids, No Alibi, Mitch Snow's Fort Huachuca Sighting Vindicated?! 💥👀 Tonight on Candace Owens podcast all the PUZZLE PIECES are snapping together. Candace just exposed the gaping holes in Erika Kirk's story around Charlie Kirk's final days. Candace dives deep: "Now we've learned more about Erica... the Fort Huachuca story. I'm leaning towards Mitch." September 8th timeline? TIGHTENING UP—Charlie was HOME watching the Chicago Bears game, screaming at his TV (waking Gigi), detailing plays like the Noah Sewell fumble. Candace's take: "Charlie was the parent that night... he was at home alone with the kids." Why? If Erika was there, he wouldn't be solo-dadding! Candace then questions Frank Turek's truthfulness. He claims Charlie had "dinner with the family" but NEVER mentions Erika. Candace: "I think Frank Turek was with Charlie... but I just don't buy that he was just suddenly in need of so much debate help." Crisis mode? Charlie consulted a rabbi, pastor (Turek?), priest in 48 hours—something BIG brewing. And that "angry" photo of Charlie looking off-screen during Ingram Angle? Likely Turek there, not Erika. NO ONE confirms seeing Erika on Sept 8th—neighbors know the family, spot the kids, but Erika? Ghost. "Nobody yet... an APB for September 8th for Erica Kirk." She pretends not to "understand instructions" for alibi proof—texts with Charlie? Unverified, could be faked. Erika's claim: Home at 5:24 PM making dinner? Lies—timeline shows Charlie parenting solo. This SCREAMS Mitch Snow was RIGHT: Saw Erika at Fort Huachuca on the 8th. "My spidey senses are telling me that Erica was not there on the 8th." Cover-up? Aggressive attacks when mentioned—we were "holding that back," but vibes say she was AWOL. All pieces aligning: Erika's pathological lies, no alibi—betrayal exposed. Charlie's legacy demands truth! FOLLOW Candace Owens, watch her FULL episode and RT if this timeline chills you. Candace is unraveling the web in real time!

Project Constitution

38,523 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Did Candace RUIN the OFFICIAL NARRATIVE by revealing that there was NO EXIT WOUND? Were they NEVER going to RELEASE ANY ANGLE from CHARLIE'S Perspective because it showed NO EXIT WOUND and the REAL SHOOTER? Was Charlie's killer a lot closer and in front of him and is this why we don't have any perspectives from Charlie's view, like THE FIRST CAMERA that they took the SD cards from? Candace say's she believes the shooter to be in the front and to the left in the crowd. Which lines up. The shooter was closer. People interviewed right after the shooting claimed it sounded a lot closer than where they say it was from, which would line up more with the "ENTRANCE WOUND" we see, what bones were broken first in his neck, and where they found the fragment of the bullet. The rifle or other gun sounds, etc., could have been all distractions, like the decoy shooters/George Zinn, to mask the sound and misdirect people from where the REAL SHOT came from. You must take into consideration how much misdirection and disinformation would be presented if this is indeed a MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE style operation. These people are very intelligent. Do NOT underestimate them. cc: Candace Owens
5:43

Did Candace RUIN the OFFICIAL NARRATIVE by revealing that there was NO EXIT WOUND? Were they NEVER going to RELEASE ANY ANGLE from CHARLIE'S Perspective because it showed NO EXIT WOUND and the REAL SHOOTER? Was Charlie's killer a lot closer and in front of him and is this why we don't have any perspectives from Charlie's view, like THE FIRST CAMERA that they took the SD cards from? Candace say's she believes the shooter to be in the front and to the left in the crowd. Which lines up. The shooter was closer. People interviewed right after the shooting claimed it sounded a lot closer than where they say it was from, which would line up more with the "ENTRANCE WOUND" we see, what bones were broken first in his neck, and where they found the fragment of the bullet. The rifle or other gun sounds, etc., could have been all distractions, like the decoy shooters/George Zinn, to mask the sound and misdirect people from where the REAL SHOT came from. You must take into consideration how much misdirection and disinformation would be presented if this is indeed a MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE style operation. These people are very intelligent. Do NOT underestimate them. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

36,744 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

On multiple occasions over the past few months, Candace has said that she never suspected Erika—until their sitdown in December, when Erika “lied” to her face, which started her suspicions. But if you actually go back and watch Candace’s episode the day after her sitdown with Erika, Candace tells the opposite story—even going to so far as to say she was “refreshed” by Erika “owning the lies” during that sitdown. I encourage everyone to go back and refresh yourself on that episode; then compare it to how Candace talks about that sitdown in the present day. Over time, she’s deceptively edited the story—pretending like her recent cruel attacks on Erika were catalyzed by that sitdown, the same sitdown in which Erika “owned the lies” according to Candace herself last December. This is exactly what Candace has done with the Mitch Snow/Fort Huachuca story—pretending she initially wasn’t that interested in it, when her own receipts say differently.
0:29

On multiple occasions over the past few months, Candace has said that she never suspected Erika—until their sitdown in December, when Erika “lied” to her face, which started her suspicions. But if you actually go back and watch Candace’s episode the day after her sitdown with Erika, Candace tells the opposite story—even going to so far as to say she was “refreshed” by Erika “owning the lies” during that sitdown. I encourage everyone to go back and refresh yourself on that episode; then compare it to how Candace talks about that sitdown in the present day. Over time, she’s deceptively edited the story—pretending like her recent cruel attacks on Erika were catalyzed by that sitdown, the same sitdown in which Erika “owned the lies” according to Candace herself last December. This is exactly what Candace has done with the Mitch Snow/Fort Huachuca story—pretending she initially wasn’t that interested in it, when her own receipts say differently.

Natalie Jean Beisner

26,751 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

My flight from Germany to Israel was canceled. The only alternative was to reroute through Rome. So yesterday I went from Germany to Switzerland, from Switzerland to Italy, and from Italy to Israel. Was it worth it? Absolutely. “What is the purpose of your visit?” they asked me at the border. The altruistic answer: I’m here to help. The honest one: especially in times of war, I sleep better at night when I’m in Israel. How do you explain that to someone who has never felt it? #travel
0:42

My flight from Germany to Israel was canceled. The only alternative was to reroute through Rome. So yesterday I went from Germany to Switzerland, from Switzerland to Italy, and from Italy to Israel. Was it worth it? Absolutely. “What is the purpose of your visit?” they asked me at the border. The altruistic answer: I’m here to help. The honest one: especially in times of war, I sleep better at night when I’m in Israel. How do you explain that to someone who has never felt it? #travel

Rawan Osman روان عثمان

332,140 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce