Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Capitano helped Scara test his “durability”. Top: Capitano • Bottom: Scaramouche #irlporn #irlnsfw #genshinnsfw #genshinimpactnsfw

irlpornacc's profile picture

Phanes

3,046 subscribers

34,204 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#irlporn#irlnsfw#genshinnsfw#genshinimpactnsfw
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Pierce says he helped LeBron reach his peak in 2012 “He gave me the 40-something piece, because I was about to go back to the Finals, he played the game of his life... I helped him get over the top, because I had to test his mental.” (MrBuckBuck)
1:38

Pierce says he helped LeBron reach his peak in 2012 “He gave me the 40-something piece, because I was about to go back to the Finals, he played the game of his life... I helped him get over the top, because I had to test his mental.” (MrBuckBuck)

NBACentral

490,717 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

James Harden on his trade from the Clippers: “I think it was just amazing on both sides. Just being open and transparent with each other. It was the best move for both sides. And I think it worked out for both sides very well… One of the best organizations that I’ve been in from top to bottom. From Ballmer to L Frank. Everybody in the front office. Coaching staff. T-Lue, JVG, they helped me be the player that I am. And then my teammates. [Kawhi] holding it down. Big Zu. I’m appreciative of the opportunity and I’ll never forget it or take it for granted.”
0:58

James Harden on his trade from the Clippers: “I think it was just amazing on both sides. Just being open and transparent with each other. It was the best move for both sides. And I think it worked out for both sides very well… One of the best organizations that I’ve been in from top to bottom. From Ballmer to L Frank. Everybody in the front office. Coaching staff. T-Lue, JVG, they helped me be the player that I am. And then my teammates. [Kawhi] holding it down. Big Zu. I’m appreciative of the opportunity and I’ll never forget it or take it for granted.”

Joey Linn

187,030 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🔗 😺 Hyunjae hyung, there’s a legendary story from today. Can I tell it? 🐻 What? 😺🦄 From this morning!! 😺 So this morning we had to gather at the hotel because we were leaving the country. Suddenly, it got super loud from far away, everyone was laughing. I went out into the hallway and saw Hyunjae hyung… his top half looked normal, but the bottom was wrapped in… like a towel- 🐿️ No, it was a bathrobe. 😺 A bathrobe! 🦄 No, not a bathrobe, it was a towel, right?? 😺 He tied the bathrobe around his waist like a skirt, literally like a skirt, and was walking around the hallway like that. All his pants were already packed in the suitcase. 🐿️ All his pants were packed, so he was just in underwear and a jacket. 🐧 Why are you telling it all messy like that? This story is actually hilarious. 🐧 Hyunjae hyung appeared today… His legs were really pale, bare legs, and he was wearing a 'white dress' (I think he meant the bathrobe looked like a white dress from afar.) 🐧 On top, he had a short padded jacket… He appeared like that with bare legs… so confident. He said “I don’t have any pants!” Turns out, when he was packing his suitcase, he put all his pants inside. 🐻 I almost got banned from China, haha. 🐧 Luckily, Juyeon had shorts in his bag. 🐧 So Hyunjae could finally wear the shorts. 🐿️ So hyung couldn’t wear pants? 🐧 The manager took them out for him. 🐻 The manager also helped with the suitcase. If I had gone straight to the airport like that, I’d have been banned from China 😂 I almost got in serious trouble. 😺 I took photos of it. I’ll upload them later. 🐻 Why would you upload that?? 🤣🤣🤣
2:37

🔗 😺 Hyunjae hyung, there’s a legendary story from today. Can I tell it? 🐻 What? 😺🦄 From this morning!! 😺 So this morning we had to gather at the hotel because we were leaving the country. Suddenly, it got super loud from far away, everyone was laughing. I went out into the hallway and saw Hyunjae hyung… his top half looked normal, but the bottom was wrapped in… like a towel- 🐿️ No, it was a bathrobe. 😺 A bathrobe! 🦄 No, not a bathrobe, it was a towel, right?? 😺 He tied the bathrobe around his waist like a skirt, literally like a skirt, and was walking around the hallway like that. All his pants were already packed in the suitcase. 🐿️ All his pants were packed, so he was just in underwear and a jacket. 🐧 Why are you telling it all messy like that? This story is actually hilarious. 🐧 Hyunjae hyung appeared today… His legs were really pale, bare legs, and he was wearing a 'white dress' (I think he meant the bathrobe looked like a white dress from afar.) 🐧 On top, he had a short padded jacket… He appeared like that with bare legs… so confident. He said “I don’t have any pants!” Turns out, when he was packing his suitcase, he put all his pants inside. 🐻 I almost got banned from China, haha. 🐧 Luckily, Juyeon had shorts in his bag. 🐧 So Hyunjae could finally wear the shorts. 🐿️ So hyung couldn’t wear pants? 🐧 The manager took them out for him. 🐻 The manager also helped with the suitcase. If I had gone straight to the airport like that, I’d have been banned from China 😂 I almost got in serious trouble. 😺 I took photos of it. I’ll upload them later. 🐻 Why would you upload that?? 🤣🤣🤣

For Hyunjae

49,945 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

ALERT U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement - this is Shocking! If you’re searching for an immigration "legal office" to investigate, controversial Attorney Vincent Martin in Bloomington, Minnesota, must be your VERY top priority. With over 15% of Bloomington’s population foreign-born, Martin seems to play a pivotal role in exploiting U.S. immigration laws, openly boasting about his strategies to bypass requirements and bring in individuals who lack even basic qualifications, such as speaking English. Loophole Exploitation Martin reveals how he works with a network of doctors to secure what seems like fraudulent disability waivers, allowing clients to skip the English, civics, and history tests required for citizenship. His own words... “We have helped hundreds of clients become U.S. citizens without having to take the English or civics test. We work with doctors who are very good at identifying issues to get the waiver they need.” Profiting from Exploitation Martin’s price is $1,000–$1,500 for citizenship cases, with deportation cases costing significantly more. He boasts about filing thousands of applications, claiming unparalleled service to Bloomington’s Somali community, stating: “We probably help more immigrant clients, including Somali clients, in a month than many attorneys do in a year.”
3:37

ALERT U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement - this is Shocking! If you’re searching for an immigration "legal office" to investigate, controversial Attorney Vincent Martin in Bloomington, Minnesota, must be your VERY top priority. With over 15% of Bloomington’s population foreign-born, Martin seems to play a pivotal role in exploiting U.S. immigration laws, openly boasting about his strategies to bypass requirements and bring in individuals who lack even basic qualifications, such as speaking English. Loophole Exploitation Martin reveals how he works with a network of doctors to secure what seems like fraudulent disability waivers, allowing clients to skip the English, civics, and history tests required for citizenship. His own words... “We have helped hundreds of clients become U.S. citizens without having to take the English or civics test. We work with doctors who are very good at identifying issues to get the waiver they need.” Profiting from Exploitation Martin’s price is $1,000–$1,500 for citizenship cases, with deportation cases costing significantly more. He boasts about filing thousands of applications, claiming unparalleled service to Bloomington’s Somali community, stating: “We probably help more immigrant clients, including Somali clients, in a month than many attorneys do in a year.”

Amy Mek

186,041 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Ran into an Anthropic engineer at an airport lounge in Frankfurt last month. SFO delayed six hours. Nothing to do. I had my laptop open. Bot running. Three agents scoring markets in the background. Guy sits two seats down. Glances at my screen. Looks away. Looks back. "Is that Polymarket?" I said yeah. "You're running it with Claude Code?" I nodded. He pulled his chair closer. "I'm on the agent team. We stress-test this exact setup internally. You built it in your kitchen" I asked what stress-test meant. "Red team. We simulate what happens when someone gives Claude raw wallet data and tells it to find the winners. You're running the thing we were scared about" I showed him the scanner. One prompt. Find every wallet with 100 plus trades, 70 plus win rate. Rank by profit. Export top 50. Claude chewed through 14,000 wallets in under 4 minutes. Came back with 47. Top 20 made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "That's not a distribution. That's a hit list" I said yeah. "And the scoring function?" Claude wrote it. I just wrapped it in an if-statement. A fill landed on screen mid-conversation. +$128 on an ETH dominance market. He stared at it. "How does it decide to enter" Three agents. Shared wallet. No shared memory. Arbitrage, convergence, whale copy. 2 of 3 agree, full size. 1 alone, half. Disagree, no trade. That consensus filter alone killed 40% of losing trades. "And the exit" The 47 whales never hold to settlement. 91% exit early. Capture 73% of max. I cut at 85% of the expected move. Or a 3x volume spike. Whichever comes first. "So you built a whale copy bot that exits before the whales" Yeah. He put his coffee down. "That's exactly the thing we gamed out in March. Management killed the internal version on policy. Nobody outside the team should have shipped this yet" I asked what he was going to do. "Fly home and pretend I didn't see it" $600 seed. 31 days. Net +$35,200. 479 trades. 75% win rate. Sharpe 2.63. I haven't touched the bot in three weeks. Copytrade for those who don't want to build - Before boarding he slid a card across the table. "When the next agent model drops, rerun your prompt. You'll see what I mean"
0:27

Ran into an Anthropic engineer at an airport lounge in Frankfurt last month. SFO delayed six hours. Nothing to do. I had my laptop open. Bot running. Three agents scoring markets in the background. Guy sits two seats down. Glances at my screen. Looks away. Looks back. "Is that Polymarket?" I said yeah. "You're running it with Claude Code?" I nodded. He pulled his chair closer. "I'm on the agent team. We stress-test this exact setup internally. You built it in your kitchen" I asked what stress-test meant. "Red team. We simulate what happens when someone gives Claude raw wallet data and tells it to find the winners. You're running the thing we were scared about" I showed him the scanner. One prompt. Find every wallet with 100 plus trades, 70 plus win rate. Rank by profit. Export top 50. Claude chewed through 14,000 wallets in under 4 minutes. Came back with 47. Top 20 made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "That's not a distribution. That's a hit list" I said yeah. "And the scoring function?" Claude wrote it. I just wrapped it in an if-statement. A fill landed on screen mid-conversation. +$128 on an ETH dominance market. He stared at it. "How does it decide to enter" Three agents. Shared wallet. No shared memory. Arbitrage, convergence, whale copy. 2 of 3 agree, full size. 1 alone, half. Disagree, no trade. That consensus filter alone killed 40% of losing trades. "And the exit" The 47 whales never hold to settlement. 91% exit early. Capture 73% of max. I cut at 85% of the expected move. Or a 3x volume spike. Whichever comes first. "So you built a whale copy bot that exits before the whales" Yeah. He put his coffee down. "That's exactly the thing we gamed out in March. Management killed the internal version on policy. Nobody outside the team should have shipped this yet" I asked what he was going to do. "Fly home and pretend I didn't see it" $600 seed. 31 days. Net +$35,200. 479 trades. 75% win rate. Sharpe 2.63. I haven't touched the bot in three weeks. Copytrade for those who don't want to build - Before boarding he slid a card across the table. "When the next agent model drops, rerun your prompt. You'll see what I mean"

rari

619,502 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Introducing: How Do You Use ChatGPT? 🚀 It's a weekly show where I interview the most interesting people in the world about how they use ChatGPT in their work and their lives—and show you every detail. The first episode is with Sahil Lavingia, CEO of Gumroad and Flexile. It's not theoretical: we screen-share through his actual prompts and responses, so you can see how ChatGPT helps him perform better at work and improve his life—one conversation at a time. We talk about how he's using ChatGPT to: Buy a building. He wants to buy a New York City hangout for Gumroad employees and customers, so he asked ChatGPT to research the history of real estate in NYC, suggest which neighborhoods might be best to target, generate questions for brokers, and even detail what the design of a particular property might look like. Write tweets. Sahil is a prolific Twitter/X user. He often uses ChatGPT to help him flesh out an idea. He says, “I [start] with a tweet, which is like a thesis, and then I just say, ‘Add three to four paragraphs to make the point compelling—also suggest more examples.’” We explore his precise process for using ChatGPT to help him brainstorm short tweets and longer essays in this episode. Pressure-test ideas. For Sahil, ChatGPT is like upgrading his peripheral vision. It lets him see around the corners, ask better questions of himself and other people, and avoid poor decisions. He told me, “I think a lot of people sort of delude themselves into thinking they have [good ideas]… I think that one of the most useful things about [ChatGPT] is it focuses your research on what actually matters.” It’s the ultimate tool to help him think better. Also in this episode: how ChatGPT could have helped Sahil save $70 million, how he thinks it will improve the most-talented creatives, and why he thinks—in the age of AI—people have no excuse for not knowing the answer to something anymore. Watch below! ---- Timestamps Intro 0:33 There’s no more excuse for not knowing anymore 2:00 He doesn’t spend as much time on bad ideas 2:50 How ChatGPT will make the top 1% of creative output better 6:15 How it turbocharges research 8:20 How he’s using ChatGPT to buy a building 11:00 How he uses ChatGPT to pressure-test ideas 17:43 How he uses DALL-E to help with interior design 20:50 How ChatGPT could have saved him $70 million 26:00 How he uses ChatGPT in his decision-making 29:50 How he uses ChatGPT for writing 38:00
47:00

Introducing: How Do You Use ChatGPT? 🚀 It's a weekly show where I interview the most interesting people in the world about how they use ChatGPT in their work and their lives—and show you every detail. The first episode is with Sahil Lavingia, CEO of Gumroad and Flexile. It's not theoretical: we screen-share through his actual prompts and responses, so you can see how ChatGPT helps him perform better at work and improve his life—one conversation at a time. We talk about how he's using ChatGPT to: Buy a building. He wants to buy a New York City hangout for Gumroad employees and customers, so he asked ChatGPT to research the history of real estate in NYC, suggest which neighborhoods might be best to target, generate questions for brokers, and even detail what the design of a particular property might look like. Write tweets. Sahil is a prolific Twitter/X user. He often uses ChatGPT to help him flesh out an idea. He says, “I [start] with a tweet, which is like a thesis, and then I just say, ‘Add three to four paragraphs to make the point compelling—also suggest more examples.’” We explore his precise process for using ChatGPT to help him brainstorm short tweets and longer essays in this episode. Pressure-test ideas. For Sahil, ChatGPT is like upgrading his peripheral vision. It lets him see around the corners, ask better questions of himself and other people, and avoid poor decisions. He told me, “I think a lot of people sort of delude themselves into thinking they have [good ideas]… I think that one of the most useful things about [ChatGPT] is it focuses your research on what actually matters.” It’s the ultimate tool to help him think better. Also in this episode: how ChatGPT could have helped Sahil save $70 million, how he thinks it will improve the most-talented creatives, and why he thinks—in the age of AI—people have no excuse for not knowing the answer to something anymore. Watch below! ---- Timestamps Intro 0:33 There’s no more excuse for not knowing anymore 2:00 He doesn’t spend as much time on bad ideas 2:50 How ChatGPT will make the top 1% of creative output better 6:15 How it turbocharges research 8:20 How he’s using ChatGPT to buy a building 11:00 How he uses ChatGPT to pressure-test ideas 17:43 How he uses DALL-E to help with interior design 20:50 How ChatGPT could have saved him $70 million 26:00 How he uses ChatGPT in his decision-making 29:50 How he uses ChatGPT for writing 38:00

Dan Shipper 📧

347,044 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The BBC wrote an objective article (For Once) about Prince William and how he weathered this year to come back on top. Drawing similarities from 1992, his grandmother Queen Elizabeth II own "Annus Horribilis"; as there were multiple marriage breakdowns within the family and a major fire at Windsor🔥 Now 32 years later, Interestingly set in the backdrop of Windsor as well, Prince William faced his own Sombre Year full of turmoil and Health crisis for both his wife and father. The Article reads: "It was a year in which certain aspects of Prince William's approach were cemented: family came first, the school run was prioritised. For the Prince of Wales, this time of turbulence appears to have reinforced what matters to him most."🔥 Indeed you cannot describe Prince William without calling him a "Family Man"❤️ The article quotes a friend of the Prince commenting: "I think what was remarkable was just how hard it was for the Prince of Wales at the start of the year; His wife had gone in for major surgery and it became worse than expected. Then there was, 'How do I tell my three children that Mummy is ill?'" "At a time when he was trying to protect his wife and children, he had that terrible thought that that if his father dies then everything changes,"💔 "He was having to operate against the backdrop of the entire world questioning what was happening to his wife." Indeed in the end, when one face something as serious as a Cancer diagnosis with a young family, the last thing someone should face is public harrassment and pressure to take pictures and wave🤡 Yet as the BBC noted, William's maturity in dealing with such a stressful situation offered a great insight into "Prince William's way of doing things". The article states: "Yes, he understood that his was a life where duty and service are expected. But for him, a man who had experienced immense loss at a young age, his wife and children were most important of all." The Article continues: "There were two other important factors at home that helped the Prince of Wales support his wife and children: his in-laws, the Middletons and living in Windsor."🔥 Indeed, Windsor provided a privacy they could not have had if they still lived in KP, London while the steadfast support and loyalty of the Middletons, allowed them a circle of trust and support to operate within. A support that was later acknowledged by Prince Louis when he wrote on his christmas card: "Thank you to Grannie and Grandpa for playing games with me"❤️ Ultimately, as humans we all face, sooner or later, our own "annus Horribilis". For all of us, that period becomes a life-changing test that either breaks us or makes us stronger. This Crisis has definitely strengthened William and Catherine as Individuals and as a couple. It is when faced with adversity that we can truly measure what we are made of and who genuinely stands by our side🔥 Well and so, the lesson here is that Every "annus horribilis" may start as such but ultimately becomes a significant victory when we focus on getting ahead rather than on crying about the present challenges. Thus, those four videos represent the Year 2024 for the Wales and how they hang on and persevered to change their story from "Annus horribilis" to "Annus Victores"🥂☕️ #PrinceandPrincessofWales
0:36

The BBC wrote an objective article (For Once) about Prince William and how he weathered this year to come back on top. Drawing similarities from 1992, his grandmother Queen Elizabeth II own "Annus Horribilis"; as there were multiple marriage breakdowns within the family and a major fire at Windsor🔥 Now 32 years later, Interestingly set in the backdrop of Windsor as well, Prince William faced his own Sombre Year full of turmoil and Health crisis for both his wife and father. The Article reads: "It was a year in which certain aspects of Prince William's approach were cemented: family came first, the school run was prioritised. For the Prince of Wales, this time of turbulence appears to have reinforced what matters to him most."🔥 Indeed you cannot describe Prince William without calling him a "Family Man"❤️ The article quotes a friend of the Prince commenting: "I think what was remarkable was just how hard it was for the Prince of Wales at the start of the year; His wife had gone in for major surgery and it became worse than expected. Then there was, 'How do I tell my three children that Mummy is ill?'" "At a time when he was trying to protect his wife and children, he had that terrible thought that that if his father dies then everything changes,"💔 "He was having to operate against the backdrop of the entire world questioning what was happening to his wife." Indeed in the end, when one face something as serious as a Cancer diagnosis with a young family, the last thing someone should face is public harrassment and pressure to take pictures and wave🤡 Yet as the BBC noted, William's maturity in dealing with such a stressful situation offered a great insight into "Prince William's way of doing things". The article states: "Yes, he understood that his was a life where duty and service are expected. But for him, a man who had experienced immense loss at a young age, his wife and children were most important of all." The Article continues: "There were two other important factors at home that helped the Prince of Wales support his wife and children: his in-laws, the Middletons and living in Windsor."🔥 Indeed, Windsor provided a privacy they could not have had if they still lived in KP, London while the steadfast support and loyalty of the Middletons, allowed them a circle of trust and support to operate within. A support that was later acknowledged by Prince Louis when he wrote on his christmas card: "Thank you to Grannie and Grandpa for playing games with me"❤️ Ultimately, as humans we all face, sooner or later, our own "annus Horribilis". For all of us, that period becomes a life-changing test that either breaks us or makes us stronger. This Crisis has definitely strengthened William and Catherine as Individuals and as a couple. It is when faced with adversity that we can truly measure what we are made of and who genuinely stands by our side🔥 Well and so, the lesson here is that Every "annus horribilis" may start as such but ultimately becomes a significant victory when we focus on getting ahead rather than on crying about the present challenges. Thus, those four videos represent the Year 2024 for the Wales and how they hang on and persevered to change their story from "Annus horribilis" to "Annus Victores"🥂☕️ #PrinceandPrincessofWales

Canellecitadelle

136,421 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 If a government were actually discussing using a nuclear weapon, would you expect silence, or leaks? That's the test Larry Johnson applies to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's claim that nuclear weapons are being discussed in White House strategy meetings on Iran. And his answer cuts against the panic. Johnson says leaks would actually be the reassuring outcome. If people inside the administration are horrified enough to talk about it, that means it's being opposed. Silence is the worse signal. He's careful to separate skepticism of the scenario from skepticism of Greene herself. He's messaged her directly for the source, and he's not dismissing the claim, just stress-testing it. But he doesn't think Trump is the rational actor a decision like this would require. Larry points to the structural rot underneath the rhetoric: the Navy retired two of its four fast combat-support ships a decade ago to save budget, then lost the resupply warehouses in Bahrain and Oman, leaving carrier strike groups with no fast way to resupply at range. That's not a Trump decision, he argues, it's bipartisan defense mismanagement finally colliding with a war that wasn't supposed to run this long. Sailors are 250 days at sea, writing "be a good goy" and "Bibi's cooks" on aircraft hulls, and the response from the top has been to call it fake news. Then there's the contradiction Larry can't square: the same week nukes are allegedly on the table, Trump posts about canceling military exercises with South Korea to preserve his relationship with Kim Jong Un. Johnson doesn't read that as de-escalation exactly. He reads it as a White House with no coherent through-line, where the next move depends entirely on which impulse wins that day. His bottom line lands hardest: even a low-yield strike buys the U.S. nothing tactically, and Iran doesn't even need to retaliate for the outcome to be catastrophic. The world turning on Washington the next morning is the damage, retaliation or not. What's actually left holding the line? SonofNewAmericanRevolution
24:03

🇺🇸🇮🇷 If a government were actually discussing using a nuclear weapon, would you expect silence, or leaks? That's the test Larry Johnson applies to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's claim that nuclear weapons are being discussed in White House strategy meetings on Iran. And his answer cuts against the panic. Johnson says leaks would actually be the reassuring outcome. If people inside the administration are horrified enough to talk about it, that means it's being opposed. Silence is the worse signal. He's careful to separate skepticism of the scenario from skepticism of Greene herself. He's messaged her directly for the source, and he's not dismissing the claim, just stress-testing it. But he doesn't think Trump is the rational actor a decision like this would require. Larry points to the structural rot underneath the rhetoric: the Navy retired two of its four fast combat-support ships a decade ago to save budget, then lost the resupply warehouses in Bahrain and Oman, leaving carrier strike groups with no fast way to resupply at range. That's not a Trump decision, he argues, it's bipartisan defense mismanagement finally colliding with a war that wasn't supposed to run this long. Sailors are 250 days at sea, writing "be a good goy" and "Bibi's cooks" on aircraft hulls, and the response from the top has been to call it fake news. Then there's the contradiction Larry can't square: the same week nukes are allegedly on the table, Trump posts about canceling military exercises with South Korea to preserve his relationship with Kim Jong Un. Johnson doesn't read that as de-escalation exactly. He reads it as a White House with no coherent through-line, where the next move depends entirely on which impulse wins that day. His bottom line lands hardest: even a low-yield strike buys the U.S. nothing tactically, and Iran doesn't even need to retaliate for the outcome to be catastrophic. The world turning on Washington the next morning is the damage, retaliation or not. What's actually left holding the line? SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

323,795 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

EVAN CARMICHAEL who has 588K INSTAGRAM followers, shared a reel about #V's rise to the top.. ▪️This boy went to an audition just to cheer on a friend, but ended up becoming the 1st K-pop soloist to hit 100 million SPOTIFY streams in the 1st week of his album release. ▪️Meet #V, whose real name is KIM TAEHYUNG, one of the 7 members of BTS. #V was born on Dec 30, 1995 in DAEGU, S.KOREA. He grew up as the oldest of 3 kids in a farming family. He helped with the farm as a child & spent a lot of time with his grandparents. ▪️From elementary school, he dreamed of becoming a singer. His father believed in that dream & encouraged him to learn the saxophone in middle school, paying for 3 years of lessons so he had a solid musical foundation to build on. ▪️In 2011, at 15 years old, V went with a friend to a BIG HIT ENTERTAINMENT audition in DAEGU. He had no plan to audition. He was just there to cheer on his friend, but a staff member spotted him & asked if he wanted to try out. He said yes. He danced, sang & beatboxed. The staff kept asking him to show more, so he came back with his saxophone & played that, too. His friend didn't make it, but he did. ▪️#V moved to SEOUL to begin training alongside the other future BTS members, but BIG HIT made a decision that would test him for the next 2 years. Founder BANG SI-HYUK believed #V was too good to be revealed early. He was worried bigger companies would try & recruit him away. He wanted the reveal to make the biggest impact possible, so he kept him completely hidden. While the other members posted videos & built a fanbase starting in 2012, #V sat quietly at the back & watched. He wasn't allowed to appear in any of it. "When all the members were shooting for their own logs, I was the only one who couldn't, so I was very sad," he later admitted. ▪️His face wasn't revealed until Jun 2, 2013, just 11 days before BTS debuted on Jun 13, 2013. Fans who had been following the group suddenly discovered there was a 7th member they had never seen. BANG SI-HYUK later said, "#V had great charms in terms of appearance & personality, so I thought it would be impactful when he was revealed last." BTS debuted, but the early years were a grind. ▪️BIG HIT was a small company with few resources & the group spent years fighting for attention in a crowded industry. #V kept working. In 2016, he co-wrote his solo track STIGMA for the album WINGS & made his acting debut in the KBS2 historical drama HWARANG: THE POET WARRIOR YOUTH. ▪️On Sept 8, 2023, a decade after his debut, #V released his solo album LAYOVER. It sold over 2.1 million copies in its 1st week of the HANTEO Chart, the best 1st week sales of any solo artist in the chart's history. It also became the first album by a K-pop soloist to earn over 100 million SPOTIFY streams in a single week. ▪️#V once said, "When things get hard, stop for a while, look back & see how far u've come. Don't forget how rewarding it is." 📎 [Notes] ▪️EVAN is an entrepreneur, author, international speaker & motivational content creator. ▪️He has a YOUTUBE channel with 3 million subscribers. ▪️He is best known for his massive social media presence aimed at helping people build self-belief. ▪️His core philosophy centers on finding your "One Word"—a single core value that defines your life's purpose & drive #BTSV
2:38

EVAN CARMICHAEL who has 588K INSTAGRAM followers, shared a reel about #V's rise to the top.. ▪️This boy went to an audition just to cheer on a friend, but ended up becoming the 1st K-pop soloist to hit 100 million SPOTIFY streams in the 1st week of his album release. ▪️Meet #V, whose real name is KIM TAEHYUNG, one of the 7 members of BTS. #V was born on Dec 30, 1995 in DAEGU, S.KOREA. He grew up as the oldest of 3 kids in a farming family. He helped with the farm as a child & spent a lot of time with his grandparents. ▪️From elementary school, he dreamed of becoming a singer. His father believed in that dream & encouraged him to learn the saxophone in middle school, paying for 3 years of lessons so he had a solid musical foundation to build on. ▪️In 2011, at 15 years old, V went with a friend to a BIG HIT ENTERTAINMENT audition in DAEGU. He had no plan to audition. He was just there to cheer on his friend, but a staff member spotted him & asked if he wanted to try out. He said yes. He danced, sang & beatboxed. The staff kept asking him to show more, so he came back with his saxophone & played that, too. His friend didn't make it, but he did. ▪️#V moved to SEOUL to begin training alongside the other future BTS members, but BIG HIT made a decision that would test him for the next 2 years. Founder BANG SI-HYUK believed #V was too good to be revealed early. He was worried bigger companies would try & recruit him away. He wanted the reveal to make the biggest impact possible, so he kept him completely hidden. While the other members posted videos & built a fanbase starting in 2012, #V sat quietly at the back & watched. He wasn't allowed to appear in any of it. "When all the members were shooting for their own logs, I was the only one who couldn't, so I was very sad," he later admitted. ▪️His face wasn't revealed until Jun 2, 2013, just 11 days before BTS debuted on Jun 13, 2013. Fans who had been following the group suddenly discovered there was a 7th member they had never seen. BANG SI-HYUK later said, "#V had great charms in terms of appearance & personality, so I thought it would be impactful when he was revealed last." BTS debuted, but the early years were a grind. ▪️BIG HIT was a small company with few resources & the group spent years fighting for attention in a crowded industry. #V kept working. In 2016, he co-wrote his solo track STIGMA for the album WINGS & made his acting debut in the KBS2 historical drama HWARANG: THE POET WARRIOR YOUTH. ▪️On Sept 8, 2023, a decade after his debut, #V released his solo album LAYOVER. It sold over 2.1 million copies in its 1st week of the HANTEO Chart, the best 1st week sales of any solo artist in the chart's history. It also became the first album by a K-pop soloist to earn over 100 million SPOTIFY streams in a single week. ▪️#V once said, "When things get hard, stop for a while, look back & see how far u've come. Don't forget how rewarding it is." 📎 [Notes] ▪️EVAN is an entrepreneur, author, international speaker & motivational content creator. ▪️He has a YOUTUBE channel with 3 million subscribers. ▪️He is best known for his massive social media presence aimed at helping people build self-belief. ▪️His core philosophy centers on finding your "One Word"—a single core value that defines your life's purpose & drive #BTSV

KTH HYPE

13,195 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Tim Ferriss just revealed his exact system for learning ANYTHING faster than 99.9% of people on Diary of a CEO. After mastering languages in weeks and advising Uber, he broke down the DSSS framework. Here's how it works + 8 other principles for superhuman performance he revealed: The DSSS Framework: Deconstruction - Break goals into parts Selection - Pick the 20% that gives 80% Sequencing - Right order matters Stakes - Create incentives "If more information were the answer, we'd all be billionaires with six pack abs." His language hack is wild: Spanish has hundreds of thousands of words. Tim reached fluency in 8-12 weeks using just the 500 most frequently used words. Stop learning random vocabulary. Learn frequency lists. Tim's career planning rule: He's NEVER had a 5-10 year plan. "If you have a reliable 5-10 year plan, you're playing so safely you're selling yourself short." Instead? 6-12 month projects with 2-4 week experiments inside. How he picks projects: Two criteria ONLY: 1. Relationships (new or deepening) 2. Skills that transcend the project Example: StumbleUpon advisor → friends with founder → years later founder texts about "taxi problem" → becomes Uber advisor. The "mini retirement" rule: Once a year, disappear for 4 weeks. No laptop. No phone (except Maps/Uber). Forces you to: - Build systems that run without you - Test if your business needs you constantly "If you panic, that's your wakeup call." His relationship rule from annual reviews: "Did I spend enough time with my top 5-10 people last year?" If NO → Reinvest in them FIRST Only overflow goes to new relationships. He's had the same annual reunion for 25+ years. Why most quit before winning: "People expect linear progress. It doesn't work that way." There WILL be plateaus. There WILL be dips. If you know they're coming, you weather them. If you don't, you quit right before the breakthrough. Tim's ONE optimization rule: Energy over passion. "Passion is imprecise." Energy is simple: - More awake or sleepy? - Can you do this 5 more hours? - Want to stop in 15 minutes? Optimize for biological energy, not philosophy. His sequencing secret: Learning swimming? Forget breathing first. Learn gliding. Kicking. Get comfortable underwater. THEN add breathing. Most try everything at once. Tim asks: What's the FIRST domino that unlocks everything else? My key takeaway? Stop treating subjects as silos. Swimming, Spanish, startups—same principles. Master the FRAMEWORK once. Apply it to anything. "Develop ONE framework you apply to ANY subject." Bottom line: Pick the right 20%. Sequence properly. Create forcing functions. Compound over 6-12 month projects for YEARS. That's how you go from suicidal college dropout to world-class performer.
2:34

Tim Ferriss just revealed his exact system for learning ANYTHING faster than 99.9% of people on Diary of a CEO. After mastering languages in weeks and advising Uber, he broke down the DSSS framework. Here's how it works + 8 other principles for superhuman performance he revealed: The DSSS Framework: Deconstruction - Break goals into parts Selection - Pick the 20% that gives 80% Sequencing - Right order matters Stakes - Create incentives "If more information were the answer, we'd all be billionaires with six pack abs." His language hack is wild: Spanish has hundreds of thousands of words. Tim reached fluency in 8-12 weeks using just the 500 most frequently used words. Stop learning random vocabulary. Learn frequency lists. Tim's career planning rule: He's NEVER had a 5-10 year plan. "If you have a reliable 5-10 year plan, you're playing so safely you're selling yourself short." Instead? 6-12 month projects with 2-4 week experiments inside. How he picks projects: Two criteria ONLY: 1. Relationships (new or deepening) 2. Skills that transcend the project Example: StumbleUpon advisor → friends with founder → years later founder texts about "taxi problem" → becomes Uber advisor. The "mini retirement" rule: Once a year, disappear for 4 weeks. No laptop. No phone (except Maps/Uber). Forces you to: - Build systems that run without you - Test if your business needs you constantly "If you panic, that's your wakeup call." His relationship rule from annual reviews: "Did I spend enough time with my top 5-10 people last year?" If NO → Reinvest in them FIRST Only overflow goes to new relationships. He's had the same annual reunion for 25+ years. Why most quit before winning: "People expect linear progress. It doesn't work that way." There WILL be plateaus. There WILL be dips. If you know they're coming, you weather them. If you don't, you quit right before the breakthrough. Tim's ONE optimization rule: Energy over passion. "Passion is imprecise." Energy is simple: - More awake or sleepy? - Can you do this 5 more hours? - Want to stop in 15 minutes? Optimize for biological energy, not philosophy. His sequencing secret: Learning swimming? Forget breathing first. Learn gliding. Kicking. Get comfortable underwater. THEN add breathing. Most try everything at once. Tim asks: What's the FIRST domino that unlocks everything else? My key takeaway? Stop treating subjects as silos. Swimming, Spanish, startups—same principles. Master the FRAMEWORK once. Apply it to anything. "Develop ONE framework you apply to ANY subject." Bottom line: Pick the right 20%. Sequence properly. Create forcing functions. Compound over 6-12 month projects for YEARS. That's how you go from suicidal college dropout to world-class performer.

Ricardo

386,337 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

I had a fantastic time discussing with the learning legend Justin Skycak from Math Academy about learning math in the modern age. we've talked about his quite impressive self-learning journey (3000h of math in high school) all the way to how he hand curated the initial knowledge graph for math academy to make that process more efficient. great lively 3h discussion here are the chapters: 0:00:00 - intro: 0:02:10 - justin background 0:05:45 - 3000h math self study in high school 0:11:45 - what a day looked like for that 3000h stretch 0:16:10 - meta-learning vs pure math learning 0:21:50 - when did you get into cognitive neuro? 0:29:55 - how did the fundamental math helped in your research projects 0:43:10 - what does the math academy learning system looks like 0:47:34 - how did you guys build the 2000 topic knowledge graph 1:01:15 - would LLM be useful as an interface to that knowledge graph for the students? 1:10:46 - how does the FIRe spaced repetition algorithm works? 1:17:34 - does the same knowledge graph structure would work for physics? or other topic?: 1:34:05 - how do you understand the subject vs the curiculum 1:35:50 - is there a connection between studying math and learning a sport? 1:42:00 - do you think in math doing and teaching requires different skills? 1:56:25 - could you get understanding without automaticy? 2:05:35 - do you see any upside of confusion in learning? 2:14:11 - learning math as an adult? 2:19:20 - how to fill the motivation gap after learning the fundamental? 2:24:10 - how should teaching math for kids and adults balance fundamentals and creativity? 2:33:55 - is it ever too late to learn math seriously? 2:46:00 - mastery learning vs ultra learning 2:51:30 - top-down vs bottom-up 2:53:40 - mastery learning for domain without a structured hierarchical structure? 2:56:30 - neurodivergence / adhd for structured math learning? 3:06:20 - amateur mathematician augmented with technology will be able to contribute to research? 3:14:37 - what are you most excited about right now in term of learning enjoy!
3:18:00

I had a fantastic time discussing with the learning legend Justin Skycak from Math Academy about learning math in the modern age. we've talked about his quite impressive self-learning journey (3000h of math in high school) all the way to how he hand curated the initial knowledge graph for math academy to make that process more efficient. great lively 3h discussion here are the chapters: 0:00:00 - intro: 0:02:10 - justin background 0:05:45 - 3000h math self study in high school 0:11:45 - what a day looked like for that 3000h stretch 0:16:10 - meta-learning vs pure math learning 0:21:50 - when did you get into cognitive neuro? 0:29:55 - how did the fundamental math helped in your research projects 0:43:10 - what does the math academy learning system looks like 0:47:34 - how did you guys build the 2000 topic knowledge graph 1:01:15 - would LLM be useful as an interface to that knowledge graph for the students? 1:10:46 - how does the FIRe spaced repetition algorithm works? 1:17:34 - does the same knowledge graph structure would work for physics? or other topic?: 1:34:05 - how do you understand the subject vs the curiculum 1:35:50 - is there a connection between studying math and learning a sport? 1:42:00 - do you think in math doing and teaching requires different skills? 1:56:25 - could you get understanding without automaticy? 2:05:35 - do you see any upside of confusion in learning? 2:14:11 - learning math as an adult? 2:19:20 - how to fill the motivation gap after learning the fundamental? 2:24:10 - how should teaching math for kids and adults balance fundamentals and creativity? 2:33:55 - is it ever too late to learn math seriously? 2:46:00 - mastery learning vs ultra learning 2:51:30 - top-down vs bottom-up 2:53:40 - mastery learning for domain without a structured hierarchical structure? 2:56:30 - neurodivergence / adhd for structured math learning? 3:06:20 - amateur mathematician augmented with technology will be able to contribute to research? 3:14:37 - what are you most excited about right now in term of learning enjoy!

Yacine Mahdid

57,320 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

In 1972, a Stanford psychologist gave 4-year-olds a choice. "One marshmallow now or wait 15 minutes and get two." Rich kid waits. Poor kid eats it immediately. For 50 years, psychologists said this proved poor kids lack self-control. Wrong. Poor kids learned that promises get broken. The second marshmallow isn't coming. Professor Jiang Xueqin spent 50 minutes explaining why the poor kids are the rational ones: The psychologist was named Walter Mischel. He put a marshmallow in front of 4-year-olds and said: "You can have it now, or wait and get two." He tracked them for decades. The kids who waited did better at everything. His conclusion: success means delayed gratification. Long-term planning. Self-control. So educators built curricula around it. Teach kids self-control, resilience, self-assessment. They'll succeed. It didn't work. "If you take a bad student and teach him self-control, resilience, and self-assessment, the student doesn't actually get better." The reason is simple: correlation does not equal causation. Successful people wake up at 4am. But waking up at 4am won't make you successful. If you're successful, you wake up early because you're motivated. If you're successful, you have self-control because your environment rewards it. The traits don't cause success. Success causes the traits. Here's what actually determines success: "We know for a fact that rich people are much more likely to succeed than poor people. School doesn't really matter. If your parents are rich, you'll be successful. If your parents are poor, you will not." The difference starts with parenting. A rich kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "You made a mistake. Don't worry about it. Let me explain why fire is dangerous. You could burn yourself. We'd have to go to the doctor." A poor kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "Don't you ever do that again or I'll beat the crap out of you." Same lesson. Completely different worldview. The rich kid learns: the world is safe. I am respected. Adults explain things to me. The poor kid learns: the world is scary. I must fear authority. Don't ask questions. There's another difference. Rich parents keep promises. Poor parents can't. "Next week we'll go to Thailand." Next week, you go to Thailand. "Next week we'll go to McDonald's." But the paycheck isn't enough. "Sorry, we can't go anymore." Rich parents offer stability. Poor parents can only offer volatility. Now go back to the marshmallow test. "If you believe the teacher will keep his promise, you won't eat that marshmallow. If you think the teacher is lying, you will eat it." If you're a poor kid, you've learned that promises get broken. Adults lie. The second marshmallow probably isn't coming. So you eat the first one. That's not lack of self-control. That's rational decision-making. "Poor kids are not stupid. Poor kids are rational. They're responding to the circumstances they live in." The same logic applies to resilience. "The idea of resilience is that you believe the world will help you. If you're rich and you fail, someone will help you get up. If you're poor and you fail, that probably tells you that you shouldn't be doing this." Why try again when trying again has never worked? And self-assessment? "If you're a poor child who lives under a lot of stress, it's hard to be self-reflective. Because if you look back at yourself, all you think about is your pain and your stress." Here's the deeper structure. "As a poor person, if you want to survive, you have to obey authority. As a rich person, you maximize your outcome by negotiating with others." Poor parents command their children because that's what the world will demand. Obey the police. Obey the boss. Don't talk back. Rich parents teach their children to debate, argue, negotiate. Because that's their game. "From day one, rich kids know they're playing a different game." Here's something stranger. 500 students took an IQ test. Then they guessed their ranking. The top 5% thought they were top 20%. The test was easy for them, so they assumed it was easy for everyone. The bottom 5% thought they were average. "People who are stupid lack the capacity to know they're stupid." This is the Dunning-Kruger effect. And it explains why the most confident people are often the least competent. "This helps explain why the world is why it is. Often the people in power are stupid. They don't know they're stupid. They were confident." Can poor kids escape? "Yes. But it means leaving your community. You have to be extremely individualistic. Very ambitious. High risk tolerance. Most people don't have that." The professor is one of them. "I'm a poor kid who succeeded. My father was a dishwasher. But I left Canada for the United States. I got lucky." "You can work as hard as you want, but the chances are against you. It takes luck. And that's often the exception to the rule, not the rule itself." Here's what he wants you to understand: When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability or effort. We forget that a poor kid eating the marshmallow isn't weak. He's learned that waiting doesn't pay. We forget that a poor kid giving up isn't lazy. He's learned that no one's coming to help. We refuse to admit that the traits we associate with success are products of environment, not causes of it. The marshmallow test is about measuring childhood, not measuring character.
52:23

In 1972, a Stanford psychologist gave 4-year-olds a choice. "One marshmallow now or wait 15 minutes and get two." Rich kid waits. Poor kid eats it immediately. For 50 years, psychologists said this proved poor kids lack self-control. Wrong. Poor kids learned that promises get broken. The second marshmallow isn't coming. Professor Jiang Xueqin spent 50 minutes explaining why the poor kids are the rational ones: The psychologist was named Walter Mischel. He put a marshmallow in front of 4-year-olds and said: "You can have it now, or wait and get two." He tracked them for decades. The kids who waited did better at everything. His conclusion: success means delayed gratification. Long-term planning. Self-control. So educators built curricula around it. Teach kids self-control, resilience, self-assessment. They'll succeed. It didn't work. "If you take a bad student and teach him self-control, resilience, and self-assessment, the student doesn't actually get better." The reason is simple: correlation does not equal causation. Successful people wake up at 4am. But waking up at 4am won't make you successful. If you're successful, you wake up early because you're motivated. If you're successful, you have self-control because your environment rewards it. The traits don't cause success. Success causes the traits. Here's what actually determines success: "We know for a fact that rich people are much more likely to succeed than poor people. School doesn't really matter. If your parents are rich, you'll be successful. If your parents are poor, you will not." The difference starts with parenting. A rich kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "You made a mistake. Don't worry about it. Let me explain why fire is dangerous. You could burn yourself. We'd have to go to the doctor." A poor kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "Don't you ever do that again or I'll beat the crap out of you." Same lesson. Completely different worldview. The rich kid learns: the world is safe. I am respected. Adults explain things to me. The poor kid learns: the world is scary. I must fear authority. Don't ask questions. There's another difference. Rich parents keep promises. Poor parents can't. "Next week we'll go to Thailand." Next week, you go to Thailand. "Next week we'll go to McDonald's." But the paycheck isn't enough. "Sorry, we can't go anymore." Rich parents offer stability. Poor parents can only offer volatility. Now go back to the marshmallow test. "If you believe the teacher will keep his promise, you won't eat that marshmallow. If you think the teacher is lying, you will eat it." If you're a poor kid, you've learned that promises get broken. Adults lie. The second marshmallow probably isn't coming. So you eat the first one. That's not lack of self-control. That's rational decision-making. "Poor kids are not stupid. Poor kids are rational. They're responding to the circumstances they live in." The same logic applies to resilience. "The idea of resilience is that you believe the world will help you. If you're rich and you fail, someone will help you get up. If you're poor and you fail, that probably tells you that you shouldn't be doing this." Why try again when trying again has never worked? And self-assessment? "If you're a poor child who lives under a lot of stress, it's hard to be self-reflective. Because if you look back at yourself, all you think about is your pain and your stress." Here's the deeper structure. "As a poor person, if you want to survive, you have to obey authority. As a rich person, you maximize your outcome by negotiating with others." Poor parents command their children because that's what the world will demand. Obey the police. Obey the boss. Don't talk back. Rich parents teach their children to debate, argue, negotiate. Because that's their game. "From day one, rich kids know they're playing a different game." Here's something stranger. 500 students took an IQ test. Then they guessed their ranking. The top 5% thought they were top 20%. The test was easy for them, so they assumed it was easy for everyone. The bottom 5% thought they were average. "People who are stupid lack the capacity to know they're stupid." This is the Dunning-Kruger effect. And it explains why the most confident people are often the least competent. "This helps explain why the world is why it is. Often the people in power are stupid. They don't know they're stupid. They were confident." Can poor kids escape? "Yes. But it means leaving your community. You have to be extremely individualistic. Very ambitious. High risk tolerance. Most people don't have that." The professor is one of them. "I'm a poor kid who succeeded. My father was a dishwasher. But I left Canada for the United States. I got lucky." "You can work as hard as you want, but the chances are against you. It takes luck. And that's often the exception to the rule, not the rule itself." Here's what he wants you to understand: When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability or effort. We forget that a poor kid eating the marshmallow isn't weak. He's learned that waiting doesn't pay. We forget that a poor kid giving up isn't lazy. He's learned that no one's coming to help. We refuse to admit that the traits we associate with success are products of environment, not causes of it. The marshmallow test is about measuring childhood, not measuring character.

Jaynit

291,792 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Macchi C.205 pilots of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana with their fighters still in Luftwaffe markings in early 1944 full clip: The Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana was the air force of the Italian Social Republic, the World War II German puppet state in Italy after the 1943 armistice divided the nation. It received numbers of Italian aircraft, later augmented with their own local production, and further aircraft from Germany. This force was opposed to the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, the Italian pro-Allied air force, though they never actually met in combat. The Macchi C.205 Veltro was an Italian World War II fighter aircraft built by the Aeronautica Macchi. Along with the Reggiane Re.2005 and Fiat G.55, this plane was one of the three "Serie 5" Italian fighters built around the powerful Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine. The C.205 was a development of the earlier C.202 Folgore. With a top speed of around 640 km/h and equipped with a pair of 20mm cannon as well as 12.7mm Breda machine guns, the C.205 was highly respected by Allied and Axis pilots alike. Widely regarded as one of the best Italian fighters of World War II, it proved to be extremely effective, destroying a significant number of Allied bombers. The Macchi C. 205 also proved capable of meeting advanced Allied fighters on relatively equal terms. While able to match the best Allied opponents in speed and maneuverability, the type's impact was limited as it was introduced late in the conflict. Due to the limitations of the Italian war economy, only a small production run was delivered before the end of the war. Like the Spitfire, the Veltro was challenging in its construction and slow to build. Italy's highest-scoring ace, Adriano Visconti, achieved 11 of his 26 credited victories in the few weeks he was able to fly the Veltro, with Sergente Maggiore pilota Luigi Gorrini shooting down 14 enemy aircraft plus six damaged with the C.205. A total of 29 C.205s reached northern airfields to be used by the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana. Macchi produced the remaining 72 aircraft of the third series for the ANR before production was shut down by Allied bombing in May 1944. Statistics on aircraft production post-Armistice are unclear and incomplete. In general, C.205s fought well in ANR service: they were attached to units that had homogeneous equipment, or at least of comparable quality, and were guided by German radar stations. Though few in number, they achieved success in inflicting losses on Allied bombers and fighters. A few Veltros were delivered to 3° Gruppo, based in Vicenza, while further Veltros were scattered throughout other small units. The 1° Gruppo C.T. of the ANR based at the Campoformido airfield was equipped with C.205 and its first operation on 3 January 1944 was a success. led by Italian ace Capitano Adriano Visconti, a formation of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses and their escort of Lockheed P-38 Lightnings bombing factories in Villar Perosa was intercepted, and four of the escorts were shot down. The aircraft were still in Luftwaffe markings as seen in this footage. On 28 January, the C.205s, now with Italian markings, succeeded in shooting down a B-24 Liberator, their first four-engined American bomber. This air victory was credited to Sergente Marconcini, Visconti's wingman. By 25 February, 1° Gruppo C.T. had reported 26 victories for nine losses. An extremely bitter aerial combat took place on 11 March, where the Italians claimed 12 victories while losing three of their own pilots. These included 1st Lt Boscutti, who was reportedly killed by gunfire from a US P-38 Lightning after he had bailed out from his stricken fighter and was hanging from his parachute. On 18 March, 30 C.205s from 1° Gruppo C.T. and 60 Bf 109s from JG.77 tangled with about 450 Allied bombers and their escorts, shooting down at least four enemy aircraft. Corp. Zaccaria was killed in action, again apparently shot at by a P-38 after bailing out. Allied bombing in April 1944 destroyed most of the Macchi and Fiat facilities, bringing fighter production to an end. With production interrupted, the Italians were forced to re-equip their three groups almost fully with Bf 109s, largely because the Germans were quick to offer some of their best models, including Bf 109G-6s and Bf 109K-4s. The Allies were less generous with the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, and Veltros, including some upgraded C.202s, were slowly replaced with worn-out P-39s and Spitfires, but not before Summer 1944. #macchi #c205 #veltro #anr #ww2 #wwi #sgm
0:26

Macchi C.205 pilots of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana with their fighters still in Luftwaffe markings in early 1944 full clip: The Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana was the air force of the Italian Social Republic, the World War II German puppet state in Italy after the 1943 armistice divided the nation. It received numbers of Italian aircraft, later augmented with their own local production, and further aircraft from Germany. This force was opposed to the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, the Italian pro-Allied air force, though they never actually met in combat. The Macchi C.205 Veltro was an Italian World War II fighter aircraft built by the Aeronautica Macchi. Along with the Reggiane Re.2005 and Fiat G.55, this plane was one of the three "Serie 5" Italian fighters built around the powerful Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine. The C.205 was a development of the earlier C.202 Folgore. With a top speed of around 640 km/h and equipped with a pair of 20mm cannon as well as 12.7mm Breda machine guns, the C.205 was highly respected by Allied and Axis pilots alike. Widely regarded as one of the best Italian fighters of World War II, it proved to be extremely effective, destroying a significant number of Allied bombers. The Macchi C. 205 also proved capable of meeting advanced Allied fighters on relatively equal terms. While able to match the best Allied opponents in speed and maneuverability, the type's impact was limited as it was introduced late in the conflict. Due to the limitations of the Italian war economy, only a small production run was delivered before the end of the war. Like the Spitfire, the Veltro was challenging in its construction and slow to build. Italy's highest-scoring ace, Adriano Visconti, achieved 11 of his 26 credited victories in the few weeks he was able to fly the Veltro, with Sergente Maggiore pilota Luigi Gorrini shooting down 14 enemy aircraft plus six damaged with the C.205. A total of 29 C.205s reached northern airfields to be used by the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana. Macchi produced the remaining 72 aircraft of the third series for the ANR before production was shut down by Allied bombing in May 1944. Statistics on aircraft production post-Armistice are unclear and incomplete. In general, C.205s fought well in ANR service: they were attached to units that had homogeneous equipment, or at least of comparable quality, and were guided by German radar stations. Though few in number, they achieved success in inflicting losses on Allied bombers and fighters. A few Veltros were delivered to 3° Gruppo, based in Vicenza, while further Veltros were scattered throughout other small units. The 1° Gruppo C.T. of the ANR based at the Campoformido airfield was equipped with C.205 and its first operation on 3 January 1944 was a success. led by Italian ace Capitano Adriano Visconti, a formation of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses and their escort of Lockheed P-38 Lightnings bombing factories in Villar Perosa was intercepted, and four of the escorts were shot down. The aircraft were still in Luftwaffe markings as seen in this footage. On 28 January, the C.205s, now with Italian markings, succeeded in shooting down a B-24 Liberator, their first four-engined American bomber. This air victory was credited to Sergente Marconcini, Visconti's wingman. By 25 February, 1° Gruppo C.T. had reported 26 victories for nine losses. An extremely bitter aerial combat took place on 11 March, where the Italians claimed 12 victories while losing three of their own pilots. These included 1st Lt Boscutti, who was reportedly killed by gunfire from a US P-38 Lightning after he had bailed out from his stricken fighter and was hanging from his parachute. On 18 March, 30 C.205s from 1° Gruppo C.T. and 60 Bf 109s from JG.77 tangled with about 450 Allied bombers and their escorts, shooting down at least four enemy aircraft. Corp. Zaccaria was killed in action, again apparently shot at by a P-38 after bailing out. Allied bombing in April 1944 destroyed most of the Macchi and Fiat facilities, bringing fighter production to an end. With production interrupted, the Italians were forced to re-equip their three groups almost fully with Bf 109s, largely because the Germans were quick to offer some of their best models, including Bf 109G-6s and Bf 109K-4s. The Allies were less generous with the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, and Veltros, including some upgraded C.202s, were slowly replaced with worn-out P-39s and Spitfires, but not before Summer 1944. #macchi #c205 #veltro #anr #ww2 #wwi #sgm

hw97karbine

28,364 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

** MEGA Parodius Scaling Effects Part 1 ** One of the big challenges with the Parodius Megadrive port is Stage 8's boss - The puffer-fish *Pooyan* with his full screen scaling effect. The goal is to be very close to the arcade (with extras on top ) so I thought lets tackle it head on to see how close we can get. I was also keen to jump into another scaling code rabit hole haha. Pyron pulled out all the stops and got me the source frames and reworked the BG tiles for this test - a big thankyou to him , Vector Orbitex is busy working on Stage 2 tracks so the team is working hard all round on this port. The MD has no sprite / background GFX scaling hardware , however the VDPs Vertical scroll can be updated per scanline to help vertical scaling on backgrounds, but there is a cpu cost to manage all the interupts so thats not free either. With the Horizontal scaling there is no help at all , apart from a semi-friendly packed pixel format for the cpu to work with, its not quite chunky format but better than planar format still for scaling. So its falls back to the 68k CPU to do all of the horizontal expansion which is the largest cpu cost. Basically drawing strips of either 1x, 2x, 3x or 4x wide columns at speed. So we are one week into this Boss's routine and you can see from the below video the horizontal scaling is implented ( vertical will be in the next update ) . We are scaling from 1x to 4x in the video below in 74 steps for testing . The column distributions are always a bit painfull to do - thankfully they are all worked out now. This is the third scaler I have built and the goal was with this one to make it really flexible for use in other projects also, sometimes when you optimise something to the last degree all the flexibility gets taken out of it. Currenty scaling at 12-25 FPS update here, I had some rules against some optimisations which I would use and some I wouldn't , thankfully we are a bit ahead of the Arcades animation frame rate here still and I may yet find optimisations that fit within the scope. We have vertical scaling and sprite spikes to add yet so Im hoping i can find a few more optimisations to offset things when they are implemented also. In a scale frame update we are processing close to 42000 pixels in ram before using DMA to send to VRAM . Using a 41x16 (656 tile scale buffer) - single buffered for now due to its size in VRAM. So thats nearly 21k in tiles ! I had to re-organise ram a bit to support a buffer of that size for the stage. The scaling function is written in 68k assembly , with a little C code handling the Vertical interupt code ( so the game logic can actually run & DMA updates etc ) . The DMA routines are in assembly also and customised for large chunk size ( big blocks of tiles ) which suits the scaler. I had some race conditions to sort out where the cpu was faster than DMA (sending tiles from RAM to VRAM ) and in some cases where it wasn't so it had to be balanced. We may be able to add more detail into the top and bottom of the background yet but its low priority for now until all the other bits are in !! #SGDK #SegaMegadrive #Genesis #Parodius
0:30

** MEGA Parodius Scaling Effects Part 1 ** One of the big challenges with the Parodius Megadrive port is Stage 8's boss - The puffer-fish *Pooyan* with his full screen scaling effect. The goal is to be very close to the arcade (with extras on top ) so I thought lets tackle it head on to see how close we can get. I was also keen to jump into another scaling code rabit hole haha. Pyron pulled out all the stops and got me the source frames and reworked the BG tiles for this test - a big thankyou to him , Vector Orbitex is busy working on Stage 2 tracks so the team is working hard all round on this port. The MD has no sprite / background GFX scaling hardware , however the VDPs Vertical scroll can be updated per scanline to help vertical scaling on backgrounds, but there is a cpu cost to manage all the interupts so thats not free either. With the Horizontal scaling there is no help at all , apart from a semi-friendly packed pixel format for the cpu to work with, its not quite chunky format but better than planar format still for scaling. So its falls back to the 68k CPU to do all of the horizontal expansion which is the largest cpu cost. Basically drawing strips of either 1x, 2x, 3x or 4x wide columns at speed. So we are one week into this Boss's routine and you can see from the below video the horizontal scaling is implented ( vertical will be in the next update ) . We are scaling from 1x to 4x in the video below in 74 steps for testing . The column distributions are always a bit painfull to do - thankfully they are all worked out now. This is the third scaler I have built and the goal was with this one to make it really flexible for use in other projects also, sometimes when you optimise something to the last degree all the flexibility gets taken out of it. Currenty scaling at 12-25 FPS update here, I had some rules against some optimisations which I would use and some I wouldn't , thankfully we are a bit ahead of the Arcades animation frame rate here still and I may yet find optimisations that fit within the scope. We have vertical scaling and sprite spikes to add yet so Im hoping i can find a few more optimisations to offset things when they are implemented also. In a scale frame update we are processing close to 42000 pixels in ram before using DMA to send to VRAM . Using a 41x16 (656 tile scale buffer) - single buffered for now due to its size in VRAM. So thats nearly 21k in tiles ! I had to re-organise ram a bit to support a buffer of that size for the stage. The scaling function is written in 68k assembly , with a little C code handling the Vertical interupt code ( so the game logic can actually run & DMA updates etc ) . The DMA routines are in assembly also and customised for large chunk size ( big blocks of tiles ) which suits the scaler. I had some race conditions to sort out where the cpu was faster than DMA (sending tiles from RAM to VRAM ) and in some cases where it wasn't so it had to be balanced. We may be able to add more detail into the top and bottom of the background yet but its low priority for now until all the other bits are in !! #SGDK #SegaMegadrive #Genesis #Parodius

Shannon Birt

25,803 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (🔖Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. ▪️CLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"▪️ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ½ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribs—particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spine—were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance → fractured right jaw → mouth → lower-right chin exit → shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage → neck re-entry above right clavicle → jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves → posterior 1st/2nd ribs → C7/T1 spinal column → severe spinal-cord injury → left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. ▪️CLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"▪️ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemaster—the alleged murder weapon—and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating force—which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammer—just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bullet—but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol
3:19

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (🔖Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. ▪️CLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"▪️ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ½ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribs—particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spine—were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance → fractured right jaw → mouth → lower-right chin exit → shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage → neck re-entry above right clavicle → jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves → posterior 1st/2nd ribs → C7/T1 spinal column → severe spinal-cord injury → left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. ▪️CLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"▪️ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemaster—the alleged murder weapon—and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating force—which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammer—just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bullet—but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

70,460 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The “President Of Peace” Just Bombed Yemen 65 Times In 24 Hours The US launched 65 airstrikes in 24 hours in Yemen, and then Trump’s intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard tweeted, “President Trump IS the President of Peace. He is ending bloodshed across the world and will deliver lasting peace in the Middle East.” These freaks have no connection with reality. ❖ I saw a video the other day of a father cradling the decapitated head of his son from an airstrike in Gaza, and I’m told I’m a terrorist supporter if I criticize the people who decapitated him. ❖ The word “terrorist” is a meaningless tool of imperial narrative control. Want to bomb some people? Designate them as terrorists. Want to silence protesters and dissidents? Say they’re supporting terrorists. Want sweeping surveillance powers? Say you need them to fight terrorism. ❖ The list of people the Trump administration is working to deport for speech crimes against Israel is getting longer and longer, and includes a doctoral student whose sole offense was writing an op-ed critical of the Gaza holocaust. Republicans spent years whining that government is too big and free speech is dying and everyone’s too weak and sensitive, only to turn around and applaud the government for stomping out free speech to protect their delicate little ears from hearing wrongthink about Israel. ❖ Two recent headlines: “Israel admits firing at ambulances in Gaza,” from The Guardian, and “Israeli soldier tells CBS News he was ordered to use Palestinians as human shields in Gaza.” The western press are only allowed to report on Israeli crimes when the Israelis admit to it themselves. Half of the evidence of Israeli atrocities in Gaza comes from Palestinians filming their own genocide. The other half comes from Israelis telling the press what they’ve been up to. ❖ The Democrats committed genocide. Now the Republicans are committing genocide. There you have it. Neither party is acceptable. Case closed. End of debate. ❖ Trump is as evil as Biden. Biden was as evil as Trump. If you can’t see this by looking at the raw data of the behavior of their administrations, it’s either because you’re looking at incomplete data or because you’re letting your political biases do your thinking for you. Both presidents are guilty of extreme evils, and you can’t separate the evils of one from the evils of the other. Biden spent the latter part of his term incinerating Gaza, and then Trump began working to clear it of Palestinians. Trump managed to secure the Gaza ceasefire that Biden spent 15 months avoiding, but then he immediately began sabotaging that very ceasefire as soon as he took office. Biden has been waging a dangerous proxy war in Ukraine that Trump helped provoke in his first term, and now that he’s back in office Trump is tasked with winding that war down to focus on new wars. The crimes of the Republican and Democratic parties are inseparably intertwined with each other. It’s not that they’re the same — there are some differences — it’s that they work in conjunction to advance the same evil agendas. Saying the Democrats are better than Republicans or vice versa is like saying the top teeth of the shark are nicer than the bottom teeth; they might look and function a bit differently, but they’re used toward the same deadly end. ❖ There are no anti-war Trump supporters. If you’re still supporting Trump after all his insane warmongering, you’re not anti-war. ❖ Trump supporters get so mad at me for listing facts about what a warmongering Israel cuck their president is. That big uncomfortable feeling you’re experiencing is called cognitive dissonance, fellas. It’s what being wrong feels like. ❖ The single most bat shit insane conspiracy theory I’ve ever encountered on the internet is that all the death and destruction we’re seeing in the live-streamed genocide in Gaza is actually an extremely high-budget film studio hoax known as “Pallywood”. Flat earthers make more sense. ❖ If Israel doesn’t want westerners voicing their opinions about it then maybe it should stop making itself such a central character in the story of 21st century western imperial warmongering. ❖ Democrats pretended to support justice and oppose racism, then Biden exposed them all as frauds in Gaza. Republicans pretended to support free speech and oppose war, then Trump exposed them as frauds with his Israel policy. US politics is just empty noise draped over an empire. That’s all it is. The pundits and politicians could all be speaking in baby talk gibberish and it wouldn’t matter. Presidential candidates could have their debates speaking Esperanto and it wouldn’t change anything. The only reason they bother using coherent English words at all is so people don’t get suspicious and start noticing that the politics of the United States are just empty noises fed to the public to let them feel like they’ve got some control while the tank treads of the empire roll onward. It’s like this in all western “democracies”. The public is split into two equal factions who are then pitted against each other on issues that are guaranteed not to inconvenience the powerful in any way, and then the state just does what’s in the interests of the empire without regard for any of the noises being made in the political sphere. And the brainwashed masses just keep babbling on about their politics, completely unaffected by the fact that the things their government is doing run squarely counter to the values they purport to hold. There’s no real connection between the two. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley:
6:32

The “President Of Peace” Just Bombed Yemen 65 Times In 24 Hours The US launched 65 airstrikes in 24 hours in Yemen, and then Trump’s intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard tweeted, “President Trump IS the President of Peace. He is ending bloodshed across the world and will deliver lasting peace in the Middle East.” These freaks have no connection with reality. ❖ I saw a video the other day of a father cradling the decapitated head of his son from an airstrike in Gaza, and I’m told I’m a terrorist supporter if I criticize the people who decapitated him. ❖ The word “terrorist” is a meaningless tool of imperial narrative control. Want to bomb some people? Designate them as terrorists. Want to silence protesters and dissidents? Say they’re supporting terrorists. Want sweeping surveillance powers? Say you need them to fight terrorism. ❖ The list of people the Trump administration is working to deport for speech crimes against Israel is getting longer and longer, and includes a doctoral student whose sole offense was writing an op-ed critical of the Gaza holocaust. Republicans spent years whining that government is too big and free speech is dying and everyone’s too weak and sensitive, only to turn around and applaud the government for stomping out free speech to protect their delicate little ears from hearing wrongthink about Israel. ❖ Two recent headlines: “Israel admits firing at ambulances in Gaza,” from The Guardian, and “Israeli soldier tells CBS News he was ordered to use Palestinians as human shields in Gaza.” The western press are only allowed to report on Israeli crimes when the Israelis admit to it themselves. Half of the evidence of Israeli atrocities in Gaza comes from Palestinians filming their own genocide. The other half comes from Israelis telling the press what they’ve been up to. ❖ The Democrats committed genocide. Now the Republicans are committing genocide. There you have it. Neither party is acceptable. Case closed. End of debate. ❖ Trump is as evil as Biden. Biden was as evil as Trump. If you can’t see this by looking at the raw data of the behavior of their administrations, it’s either because you’re looking at incomplete data or because you’re letting your political biases do your thinking for you. Both presidents are guilty of extreme evils, and you can’t separate the evils of one from the evils of the other. Biden spent the latter part of his term incinerating Gaza, and then Trump began working to clear it of Palestinians. Trump managed to secure the Gaza ceasefire that Biden spent 15 months avoiding, but then he immediately began sabotaging that very ceasefire as soon as he took office. Biden has been waging a dangerous proxy war in Ukraine that Trump helped provoke in his first term, and now that he’s back in office Trump is tasked with winding that war down to focus on new wars. The crimes of the Republican and Democratic parties are inseparably intertwined with each other. It’s not that they’re the same — there are some differences — it’s that they work in conjunction to advance the same evil agendas. Saying the Democrats are better than Republicans or vice versa is like saying the top teeth of the shark are nicer than the bottom teeth; they might look and function a bit differently, but they’re used toward the same deadly end. ❖ There are no anti-war Trump supporters. If you’re still supporting Trump after all his insane warmongering, you’re not anti-war. ❖ Trump supporters get so mad at me for listing facts about what a warmongering Israel cuck their president is. That big uncomfortable feeling you’re experiencing is called cognitive dissonance, fellas. It’s what being wrong feels like. ❖ The single most bat shit insane conspiracy theory I’ve ever encountered on the internet is that all the death and destruction we’re seeing in the live-streamed genocide in Gaza is actually an extremely high-budget film studio hoax known as “Pallywood”. Flat earthers make more sense. ❖ If Israel doesn’t want westerners voicing their opinions about it then maybe it should stop making itself such a central character in the story of 21st century western imperial warmongering. ❖ Democrats pretended to support justice and oppose racism, then Biden exposed them all as frauds in Gaza. Republicans pretended to support free speech and oppose war, then Trump exposed them as frauds with his Israel policy. US politics is just empty noise draped over an empire. That’s all it is. The pundits and politicians could all be speaking in baby talk gibberish and it wouldn’t matter. Presidential candidates could have their debates speaking Esperanto and it wouldn’t change anything. The only reason they bother using coherent English words at all is so people don’t get suspicious and start noticing that the politics of the United States are just empty noises fed to the public to let them feel like they’ve got some control while the tank treads of the empire roll onward. It’s like this in all western “democracies”. The public is split into two equal factions who are then pitted against each other on issues that are guaranteed not to inconvenience the powerful in any way, and then the state just does what’s in the interests of the empire without regard for any of the noises being made in the political sphere. And the brainwashed masses just keep babbling on about their politics, completely unaffected by the fact that the things their government is doing run squarely counter to the values they purport to hold. There’s no real connection between the two. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

118,807 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce