Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Cast: Morgan Ray, Ralph Long #rhapiuREVIEWS 217 #ReleasedThisDay0430 2008 #BJrhapiu #MILFrhapiu #TITFUCKrhapiu #BIGCOCKrhapiu

bopedia2's profile picture

📀 PorNostalgia 🔞

42,973 subscribers

45,972 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#rhapiuREVIEWS#ReleasedThisDay0430#BJrhapiu#MILFrhapiu#TITFUCKrhapiu#BIGCOCKrhapiu
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"When I started out on Broadway, 'Dreamgirls,' we lost half of our cast to AIDS." Sheryl Lee Ralph—famous for her breakout role in the original Broadway production of 'Dreamgirls' and her ongoing portrayal of the no-nonsense kindergarten teacher on the sitcom 'Abbott Elementary'—champions another kind of teaching through her decades-long work as an activist, particularly raising awareness about HIV/AIDS. Recently, in collaboration with the DIVA Foundation, the nonprofit she founded in 1990, Ralph executive-produced documentary special 'Living Proof' which highlights the experiences of Black women living with HIV in the South. Leading by example, Sheryl Lee Ralph is honored among TIME's 16 Women of the Year. Read her story and meet the honorees here:
1:12

"When I started out on Broadway, 'Dreamgirls,' we lost half of our cast to AIDS." Sheryl Lee Ralph—famous for her breakout role in the original Broadway production of 'Dreamgirls' and her ongoing portrayal of the no-nonsense kindergarten teacher on the sitcom 'Abbott Elementary'—champions another kind of teaching through her decades-long work as an activist, particularly raising awareness about HIV/AIDS. Recently, in collaboration with the DIVA Foundation, the nonprofit she founded in 1990, Ralph executive-produced documentary special 'Living Proof' which highlights the experiences of Black women living with HIV in the South. Leading by example, Sheryl Lee Ralph is honored among TIME's 16 Women of the Year. Read her story and meet the honorees here:

TIME

2,411,405 views • 5 months ago

Brad Pitt had seen "Hunger" (2008) and long wanted to work with Steve McQueen. Pitt's production company, agreed to help finance "12 Years a Slave" (2013), with Brad Pitt cast in a small role. Pitt’s reverence for the project was religious. He said, “If I never get to participate in a film again, this is it for me.” ("Steve McQueen on 12 Years a Slave", Dan P. Lee, Vulture, 2013)
1:55

Brad Pitt had seen "Hunger" (2008) and long wanted to work with Steve McQueen. Pitt's production company, agreed to help finance "12 Years a Slave" (2013), with Brad Pitt cast in a small role. Pitt’s reverence for the project was religious. He said, “If I never get to participate in a film again, this is it for me.” ("Steve McQueen on 12 Years a Slave", Dan P. Lee, Vulture, 2013)

DepressedBergman

60,952 views • 9 days ago

“HUGO CHÁVEZ RIGGED THE 2008 U.S. ELECTION” WATCH NOW: Before President Donald Trump delivered his highly anticipated address, Lara Logan was joined by former CIA officer Gary Berntsen and investigative journalist and author Ralph Pezzullo for a special livestream examining the key national security issues, election integrity concerns, and broader political landscape facing the country. During the discussion, Pezzullo shares what he says he uncovered during a years-long investigation with election researcher Gary and explains why he believes the evidence they gathered should have prompted a stronger response from government officials. He also argues that the issues extend beyond the 2020 election, pointing to allegations dating back to 2008, including his assertion that former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez played a role in influencing the U.S. election. Watch the full discussion and decide for yourself. Support Lara’s journalism: #LaraLogan #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionSecurity #NationalSecurity #Politics
1:19

“HUGO CHÁVEZ RIGGED THE 2008 U.S. ELECTION” WATCH NOW: Before President Donald Trump delivered his highly anticipated address, Lara Logan was joined by former CIA officer Gary Berntsen and investigative journalist and author Ralph Pezzullo for a special livestream examining the key national security issues, election integrity concerns, and broader political landscape facing the country. During the discussion, Pezzullo shares what he says he uncovered during a years-long investigation with election researcher Gary and explains why he believes the evidence they gathered should have prompted a stronger response from government officials. He also argues that the issues extend beyond the 2020 election, pointing to allegations dating back to 2008, including his assertion that former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez played a role in influencing the U.S. election. Watch the full discussion and decide for yourself. Support Lara’s journalism: #LaraLogan #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionSecurity #NationalSecurity #Politics

Lara Logan

67,385 views • 1 month ago

Highest-Graded Single-Season PFF Run Defense Linebackers All-Time (since 2006): 1. DET Jack Campbell (2025) — 93.5 2. TEN David Long (2023) — 92.6 3. CAR Luke Kuechly (2018) — 91.8 4. IND Jerrell Freeman (2015) — 91.7 5. SF Patrick Willis (2012) — 91.6 5t. NYJ Bart Scott (2010) — 91.6 7. SEA Bobby Wagner (2023) — 91.5 7t. WAS London Fletcher (2008) — 91.5 9. DEN Alexander Johnson (2019) — 91.4 10. SF Fred Warner (2025) — 91.3 10t. SEA Bobby Wagner (2016) — 91.3 10t. SF NaVorro Bowman (2011) — 91.3 10t. BAL Ray Lewis (2009) — 91.3 14. SEA Bobby Wagner (2018) — 91.2 15. Five player seasons tied — 91.1
0:21

Highest-Graded Single-Season PFF Run Defense Linebackers All-Time (since 2006): 1. DET Jack Campbell (2025) — 93.5 2. TEN David Long (2023) — 92.6 3. CAR Luke Kuechly (2018) — 91.8 4. IND Jerrell Freeman (2015) — 91.7 5. SF Patrick Willis (2012) — 91.6 5t. NYJ Bart Scott (2010) — 91.6 7. SEA Bobby Wagner (2023) — 91.5 7t. WAS London Fletcher (2008) — 91.5 9. DEN Alexander Johnson (2019) — 91.4 10. SF Fred Warner (2025) — 91.3 10t. SEA Bobby Wagner (2016) — 91.3 10t. SF NaVorro Bowman (2011) — 91.3 10t. BAL Ray Lewis (2009) — 91.3 14. SEA Bobby Wagner (2018) — 91.2 15. Five player seasons tied — 91.1

Al Karsten

178,352 views • 9 months ago

What does the financial future of the world ACTUALLY look like for everyday people? Ray Dalio has spent more than 50 years studying how countries rise and fall, why economies break down and the patterns that shape the world long before most people notice them. Now, he believes the next five years could bring major disruption across debt, politics and geopolitics. Ray founded Bridgewater from a two-bedroom apartment and grew it into one of the most successful hedge funds in history. In 2008, while a major US stock index fell nearly 40%, Ray Dalio’s firm MADE 9.5%. I wanted to understand what someone with that perspective thinks people should actually be doing today to prepare for what comes next. We sat down and discussed: • Why he believes an AI bubble is forming. • What history teaches us about debt, power and the changing world order. • The biggest mistake people make when preparing for the future. • How he thinks about Gold, Bitcoin, property and protecting wealth in uncertain times. • Why AI could dramatically increase the wealth gap. • The principles that helped him build one of the most successful investment firms in history. Ray told me his purpose now is simply to help people understand the cause and effect behind money, markets, politics and how the world is changing. If you’re trying to make better decisions about your future, career, finances or simply how to think more clearly in an increasingly unpredictable world, I think you’ll get a huge amount from this conversation. Ray Dalio, out now on all platforms.❤️👊🏾
1:28

What does the financial future of the world ACTUALLY look like for everyday people? Ray Dalio has spent more than 50 years studying how countries rise and fall, why economies break down and the patterns that shape the world long before most people notice them. Now, he believes the next five years could bring major disruption across debt, politics and geopolitics. Ray founded Bridgewater from a two-bedroom apartment and grew it into one of the most successful hedge funds in history. In 2008, while a major US stock index fell nearly 40%, Ray Dalio’s firm MADE 9.5%. I wanted to understand what someone with that perspective thinks people should actually be doing today to prepare for what comes next. We sat down and discussed: • Why he believes an AI bubble is forming. • What history teaches us about debt, power and the changing world order. • The biggest mistake people make when preparing for the future. • How he thinks about Gold, Bitcoin, property and protecting wealth in uncertain times. • Why AI could dramatically increase the wealth gap. • The principles that helped him build one of the most successful investment firms in history. Ray told me his purpose now is simply to help people understand the cause and effect behind money, markets, politics and how the world is changing. If you’re trying to make better decisions about your future, career, finances or simply how to think more clearly in an increasingly unpredictable world, I think you’ll get a huge amount from this conversation. Ray Dalio, out now on all platforms.❤️👊🏾

Steven Bartlett

28,904 views • 1 month ago

🚩🚩 Watching "The Big Short" in 2025 is dejavu... The 2008 housing bubble feels eerily relevant with today's sky-high stock & housing valuations 🤌 In 08, the crisis stemmed from a massively overvalued housing market fueled by risky subprime loans, lax regulation, and greed Banks bundled junk mortgages into "safe" securities, creating the massive housing bubble... Nothing has really changed. It's just a facade. TODAY: 📈📉 The Fed is warning about overleveraged hedge funds. - Michael Burry is betting on Palantir dropping in price with puts worth nearly $1 billion = 66% of his firms AUM. -Stocks are screaming "overvalued" in every way. - The S&P 500 is 63% above its long-term trend -The Warren Buffett Indicator is at a record 217%+ - Goldman & Morgan Stanley predict 20% corrections soon. 🏠🏠 Housing is bubbly and overvalued from the 2020 free money, low interest rates, and bidding wars. -Sales are crashing while prices stall. - Experts call the market "frozen" with subdued growth -Not as leveraged as '08, but affordability's tanked with higher rates. -Speculative bubbles (AI/tech stocks now vs. housing then) - Many expert warnings of crashes with scary similarities -Fed stopping QT and beginning easing amid softening economy - 1 million+ fewer jobs created in 2024 than stated by the Biden admin per revisions to 2024's fake numbers - falling new-job numbers for 2025 - Growing Repo market borrowing from desperate banks (again) -Volatility rising on potential meltdowns 2025's mess is more driven by toxic derivatives in the stock market, lax regulation, and greed... 🤌 it's just a different flavor of 2008. And still, impunity for banks and big players persists... sound familiar? Nothing changed. It's time for change - 🔥LIT🔥XCHANGE🔥 🚨 Buckle up and repost if you're ready for the housing and stock market corrections 💎 🙌
3:18

🚩🚩 Watching "The Big Short" in 2025 is dejavu... The 2008 housing bubble feels eerily relevant with today's sky-high stock & housing valuations 🤌 In 08, the crisis stemmed from a massively overvalued housing market fueled by risky subprime loans, lax regulation, and greed Banks bundled junk mortgages into "safe" securities, creating the massive housing bubble... Nothing has really changed. It's just a facade. TODAY: 📈📉 The Fed is warning about overleveraged hedge funds. - Michael Burry is betting on Palantir dropping in price with puts worth nearly $1 billion = 66% of his firms AUM. -Stocks are screaming "overvalued" in every way. - The S&P 500 is 63% above its long-term trend -The Warren Buffett Indicator is at a record 217%+ - Goldman & Morgan Stanley predict 20% corrections soon. 🏠🏠 Housing is bubbly and overvalued from the 2020 free money, low interest rates, and bidding wars. -Sales are crashing while prices stall. - Experts call the market "frozen" with subdued growth -Not as leveraged as '08, but affordability's tanked with higher rates. -Speculative bubbles (AI/tech stocks now vs. housing then) - Many expert warnings of crashes with scary similarities -Fed stopping QT and beginning easing amid softening economy - 1 million+ fewer jobs created in 2024 than stated by the Biden admin per revisions to 2024's fake numbers - falling new-job numbers for 2025 - Growing Repo market borrowing from desperate banks (again) -Volatility rising on potential meltdowns 2025's mess is more driven by toxic derivatives in the stock market, lax regulation, and greed... 🤌 it's just a different flavor of 2008. And still, impunity for banks and big players persists... sound familiar? Nothing changed. It's time for change - 🔥LIT🔥XCHANGE🔥 🚨 Buckle up and repost if you're ready for the housing and stock market corrections 💎 🙌

The Butcher of Wall Street | Marcel Kalinovic

506,013 views • 9 months ago

Reconstructing the world in 3D from random internet photos is a deep rabbit hole. In 2008, Photosynth proved that 3D reconstruction of smaller monuments was possible. The next year, "Building Rome in a Day" proved it could be done for entire cities. Since then, there’s been a wild lineage of research from early point clouds to modern NeRFs and 3DGS --with a similar cast of characters appearing along the way. In this deep dive, we'll break it all down, and explore why IARPA is funding what comes next. 0:00 The Internet's 3D Model of the World 0:40 Building Rome in a Day (2009) 2:09 The Long Tail Problem 3:18 MegaDepth and the Mannequin Challenge 4:44 NeRFs and 3D Gaussian Splatting 7:19 MegaScenes, Doppelgangers, and Foundation Models 10:00 MegaDepth-X Punches Through the Wall 11:26 Why IARPA Is Funding What's Next 13:51 The 4D Frontier and the Sensorium
15:28

Reconstructing the world in 3D from random internet photos is a deep rabbit hole. In 2008, Photosynth proved that 3D reconstruction of smaller monuments was possible. The next year, "Building Rome in a Day" proved it could be done for entire cities. Since then, there’s been a wild lineage of research from early point clouds to modern NeRFs and 3DGS --with a similar cast of characters appearing along the way. In this deep dive, we'll break it all down, and explore why IARPA is funding what comes next. 0:00 The Internet's 3D Model of the World 0:40 Building Rome in a Day (2009) 2:09 The Long Tail Problem 3:18 MegaDepth and the Mannequin Challenge 4:44 NeRFs and 3D Gaussian Splatting 7:19 MegaScenes, Doppelgangers, and Foundation Models 10:00 MegaDepth-X Punches Through the Wall 11:26 Why IARPA Is Funding What's Next 13:51 The 4D Frontier and the Sensorium

Bilawal Sidhu

51,292 views • 16 days ago

Hi folks, I can't believe it's 40 years since we filmed the music video for my hit 'NEVERENDING STORY'' in Munich at BAVARIA FILM STUDIOS - we had no idea the song would have such an impact, No'1 in 17 countries. Currently the SPOTIFY streams are 2.3 million per month. A stage musical adaptation is now running in Barcelona after a successful year-long run in Madrid (where I attended the opening night to perform with the cast). After a recent bidding war, the story is being revived again for the big screen with a new joint venture between Michael Ende Productions and SEE-SAW FILMS, bringing the world of FANTASIA back to cinemas through multiple live-action films. Finally, a new 90-minute documentary LIFE AFTER THE NEVERENDING STORY recently premiered in London where I attended a Q&A with actress TAMI STRONACH, who played the CHILD EMPRESS in the original movie, is now available on Blu-Ray DVD 😊
0:44

Hi folks, I can't believe it's 40 years since we filmed the music video for my hit 'NEVERENDING STORY'' in Munich at BAVARIA FILM STUDIOS - we had no idea the song would have such an impact, No'1 in 17 countries. Currently the SPOTIFY streams are 2.3 million per month. A stage musical adaptation is now running in Barcelona after a successful year-long run in Madrid (where I attended the opening night to perform with the cast). After a recent bidding war, the story is being revived again for the big screen with a new joint venture between Michael Ende Productions and SEE-SAW FILMS, bringing the world of FANTASIA back to cinemas through multiple live-action films. Finally, a new 90-minute documentary LIFE AFTER THE NEVERENDING STORY recently premiered in London where I attended a Q&A with actress TAMI STRONACH, who played the CHILD EMPRESS in the original movie, is now available on Blu-Ray DVD 😊

Limahl_Official

17,164 views • 2 years ago

BEFORE YOU BOARD YOUR NEXT FLIGHT READ THIS A former airline captain named John Hoyte reached out to me recently. He spent nearly 30 years flying commercial aircraft, developed serious neurological damage, lost his career, and has been trying to get this story properly investigated ever since. He sent me documents spanning two decades. The scale of what is in them is HUGE. What he shared includes parliamentary records, a 320-page published report from the British pilots union, BBC coverage, House of Lords testimony, and active litigation in multiple countries. This has been heard at the highest levels. It has largely been buried. Most commercial jet aircraft use a system called bleed air. Instead of drawing fresh air from outside, the plane takes compressed air directly from the engines and pumps it into the cabin. That is the air you breathe for the entire flight. When engine seals wear down, oil and hydraulic fluid can leak into that air supply. Those fluids contain organophosphates, the same compounds found in certain pesticides and nerve agents. Inhaling them can cause neurological damage, memory loss, and chronic fatigue. In documented cases, far worse. This design has been in use since the 1950s. The health risk has been documented for just as long. In 2005, BALPA, the British pilots union, published a full conference report on this with the University of New South Wales. The following year, 27 BALPA pilots were tested by University College London. All 27 showed evidence of toxic poisoning and reduced cognitive function. Not some of them. All of them. BBCPanorama covered it in 2008. The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee heard evidence on it in 2007 and 2008. In February 2007, 40 unrelated passengers on a single XL Airways flight were seriously injured by contaminated cabin air. Their cases went to court. Twenty of them won a US jurisdiction ruling in 2010. A UK coroner recorded a death linked to this in 2015. France has formally recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. In the US, a law professor is suing Boeing for $40 million after a single exposure left him permanently injured. Morgan & Morgan, America's largest personal injury firm, is now actively taking mass cases on behalf of passengers and crew. John himself was one of those 27 pilots tested by UCL. He founded the Aerotoxic Association in 2007 at the Houses of Parliament to support other survivors. He has been fighting for this for nearly 20 years. Almost every commercial jet aircraft except the Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses the bleed air system. The 787 uses a different design that avoids this problem entirely. That safer design has existed for years. That fact alone says everything. BBC has not covered this story since 2020. The UK Civil Aviation Authority continues to say there is no positive evidence of a link. The Aerotoxic Association has been contacted by more than 2,500 people who believe they have been affected. John is looking for mainstream investigative journalists who want to dig deep into this. He is an expert witness with decades of evidence and is willing to answer every question. He has a passenger injured on that 2007 flight, Samantha Sabatino, whose case is in the parliamentary record. This is a genuine story of enormous public interest and it deserves proper investigation. If you are a journalist or researcher and want to speak to John directly, his contact details are in the comments. I will add media coverage links in the comments section. Sources: Aerotoxic Association (Aerotoxic Association) BALPA (British Airline Pilots Association) Morgan & Morgan (Morgan & Morgan) gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive) BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air. Herald Scotland The Wall Street Journal FlightGlobal Canary @the_ecologist
6:43

BEFORE YOU BOARD YOUR NEXT FLIGHT READ THIS A former airline captain named John Hoyte reached out to me recently. He spent nearly 30 years flying commercial aircraft, developed serious neurological damage, lost his career, and has been trying to get this story properly investigated ever since. He sent me documents spanning two decades. The scale of what is in them is HUGE. What he shared includes parliamentary records, a 320-page published report from the British pilots union, BBC coverage, House of Lords testimony, and active litigation in multiple countries. This has been heard at the highest levels. It has largely been buried. Most commercial jet aircraft use a system called bleed air. Instead of drawing fresh air from outside, the plane takes compressed air directly from the engines and pumps it into the cabin. That is the air you breathe for the entire flight. When engine seals wear down, oil and hydraulic fluid can leak into that air supply. Those fluids contain organophosphates, the same compounds found in certain pesticides and nerve agents. Inhaling them can cause neurological damage, memory loss, and chronic fatigue. In documented cases, far worse. This design has been in use since the 1950s. The health risk has been documented for just as long. In 2005, BALPA, the British pilots union, published a full conference report on this with the University of New South Wales. The following year, 27 BALPA pilots were tested by University College London. All 27 showed evidence of toxic poisoning and reduced cognitive function. Not some of them. All of them. BBCPanorama covered it in 2008. The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee heard evidence on it in 2007 and 2008. In February 2007, 40 unrelated passengers on a single XL Airways flight were seriously injured by contaminated cabin air. Their cases went to court. Twenty of them won a US jurisdiction ruling in 2010. A UK coroner recorded a death linked to this in 2015. France has formally recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. In the US, a law professor is suing Boeing for $40 million after a single exposure left him permanently injured. Morgan & Morgan, America's largest personal injury firm, is now actively taking mass cases on behalf of passengers and crew. John himself was one of those 27 pilots tested by UCL. He founded the Aerotoxic Association in 2007 at the Houses of Parliament to support other survivors. He has been fighting for this for nearly 20 years. Almost every commercial jet aircraft except the Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses the bleed air system. The 787 uses a different design that avoids this problem entirely. That safer design has existed for years. That fact alone says everything. BBC has not covered this story since 2020. The UK Civil Aviation Authority continues to say there is no positive evidence of a link. The Aerotoxic Association has been contacted by more than 2,500 people who believe they have been affected. John is looking for mainstream investigative journalists who want to dig deep into this. He is an expert witness with decades of evidence and is willing to answer every question. He has a passenger injured on that 2007 flight, Samantha Sabatino, whose case is in the parliamentary record. This is a genuine story of enormous public interest and it deserves proper investigation. If you are a journalist or researcher and want to speak to John directly, his contact details are in the comments. I will add media coverage links in the comments section. Sources: Aerotoxic Association (Aerotoxic Association) BALPA (British Airline Pilots Association) Morgan & Morgan (Morgan & Morgan) gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive) BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air. Herald Scotland The Wall Street Journal FlightGlobal Canary @the_ecologist

Artur Nadolny

760,944 views • 2 months ago

🚨THEY SAID ELECTION FRAUD “NEVER HAPPENS”… THEN A CNN PANEL GOT HIT WITH THE RECEIPTS RIGHT IN FRONT OF OBAMA’S STRATEGIST Bush White House spokesman Pete Seat is sitting three feet from David Axelrod on live CNN and drops the nuclear fact: “Barack Obama got on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot because Democrats in St. Joseph County submitted FRAUDULENT petition signatures. People — including the county Democratic chair — went to JAIL over it. He shouldn’t have been on that ballot.” Axelrod freezes. “How did that get determined?” Seat doesn’t blink: “It was exposed TWO YEARS later. Went through the courts. People went to jail. That’s the problem… nobody caught it before he was already on the ballot.” 100% documented. In 2013 four Indiana Democrats were convicted for forging those signatures — literally copying names off old petitions. Even a former governor’s name was forged. County Democratic Chairman Butch Morgan went to prison for running the whole operation. The thing they swear never happens… HAPPENED. And a party chairman did hard time for it. Election fraud isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a documented crime they got away with long enough to change history. Share this before they try to memory-hole it again.
1:02

🚨THEY SAID ELECTION FRAUD “NEVER HAPPENS”… THEN A CNN PANEL GOT HIT WITH THE RECEIPTS RIGHT IN FRONT OF OBAMA’S STRATEGIST Bush White House spokesman Pete Seat is sitting three feet from David Axelrod on live CNN and drops the nuclear fact: “Barack Obama got on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot because Democrats in St. Joseph County submitted FRAUDULENT petition signatures. People — including the county Democratic chair — went to JAIL over it. He shouldn’t have been on that ballot.” Axelrod freezes. “How did that get determined?” Seat doesn’t blink: “It was exposed TWO YEARS later. Went through the courts. People went to jail. That’s the problem… nobody caught it before he was already on the ballot.” 100% documented. In 2013 four Indiana Democrats were convicted for forging those signatures — literally copying names off old petitions. Even a former governor’s name was forged. County Democratic Chairman Butch Morgan went to prison for running the whole operation. The thing they swear never happens… HAPPENED. And a party chairman did hard time for it. Election fraud isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a documented crime they got away with long enough to change history. Share this before they try to memory-hole it again.

QThestorm

12,361 views • 9 days ago

As a 2026 austin candidate, Paramount plus trying to out smart California and come to Austin Texas, as a long standing talent on paramount plus who brought the ratings For 18 years, I’ve watched a network profit off of my family's story, but now, the line has been crossed. I am speaking out regarding the Paramount+ and Warner Bros. Discovery, HBO MAX merger—not just as a professional, but as a mother fighting for her child and a teen at the time who needed this vindication today. I’ve sent a 27 page forensic audit to commission California AG: ⁠Rob Bonta⁠ ⁠Allen Golden Texas AG: ⁠Attorney General Ken Paxton⁠ | ⁠ Texas Attorney General⁠ DOJ Antitrust: ⁠@JusticeOAP | ⁠@DOJDiario⁠ to act immediately as I can not support a merger when these criminal actions by Paramount continue August 2026. We are talking about the purposeful systemic suppression of wages, the violation of child labor laws, and a pattern of generational financial abuse that has gone on long enough. It’s not just about business; it’s about the default of payments owed to my daughter, Sophia Abraham , and the potential silencing of evidence that could be erased in this corporate buyout. When litigation teams act as if they are above the law, it’s time to bring the Attorney Generals into the conversation. Transparency and accountability aren't optional. I’m demanding justice for the 18 years of exploitation, and I’m making it public because the truth matters and my cast needs to stop suffering in silence. The teen girl Farrah Abraham fought for her parents to be paid more, my parents didn’t fight for me, I fight for my child’s rights to be upheld against corperate bully tactics. To CAITLYNN, Amber, Maci, Teen mom 2 Kail Lowry, Chelsea,Janelle Evans ,3,4 cast etc members fight for your teen selves and your kids or forever suffer in silence - rise for a class action. I will not “California” my Texas, that’s why I went to a trauma center in Texas after being brutally attacked in California from “Teen Mom’s” hate watch commercials . Any retaliation is against the law & I stand by removing 145 episodes of 16&pregnant and teen mom until my forensic audit has been paid and corrected with my daughter Sophialabraham ’s payments, delinquent bonus payments that match public ratings facts. Sophia and all the children of the cast should be compensated for an intensive trauma recovery center as being placed in harms way on a hate watch edited show against our consent nor knowledge. Equal pay , favored nations is not in our contracts but in emails, calls, texts coercion by Sara prager, Larry Musnik, Morgan freeman and production accomplices of the scheme to suppress pay for teens, kids and adults, the scam is over, the trauma bonds are dead and I will show up for the next generation of talent on tv, entertainment reform is alive. Thank you to Netflix for your upcoming Teen Mom documentary and I’m happy you can’t be bought out by Paramount. #FarrahAbraham #TeenMom #ParamountPlus #ChildLaborLaws #paramountmerger
2:10

As a 2026 austin candidate, Paramount plus trying to out smart California and come to Austin Texas, as a long standing talent on paramount plus who brought the ratings For 18 years, I’ve watched a network profit off of my family's story, but now, the line has been crossed. I am speaking out regarding the Paramount+ and Warner Bros. Discovery, HBO MAX merger—not just as a professional, but as a mother fighting for her child and a teen at the time who needed this vindication today. I’ve sent a 27 page forensic audit to commission California AG: ⁠Rob Bonta⁠ ⁠Allen Golden Texas AG: ⁠Attorney General Ken Paxton⁠ | ⁠ Texas Attorney General⁠ DOJ Antitrust: ⁠@JusticeOAP | ⁠@DOJDiario⁠ to act immediately as I can not support a merger when these criminal actions by Paramount continue August 2026. We are talking about the purposeful systemic suppression of wages, the violation of child labor laws, and a pattern of generational financial abuse that has gone on long enough. It’s not just about business; it’s about the default of payments owed to my daughter, Sophia Abraham , and the potential silencing of evidence that could be erased in this corporate buyout. When litigation teams act as if they are above the law, it’s time to bring the Attorney Generals into the conversation. Transparency and accountability aren't optional. I’m demanding justice for the 18 years of exploitation, and I’m making it public because the truth matters and my cast needs to stop suffering in silence. The teen girl Farrah Abraham fought for her parents to be paid more, my parents didn’t fight for me, I fight for my child’s rights to be upheld against corperate bully tactics. To CAITLYNN, Amber, Maci, Teen mom 2 Kail Lowry, Chelsea,Janelle Evans ,3,4 cast etc members fight for your teen selves and your kids or forever suffer in silence - rise for a class action. I will not “California” my Texas, that’s why I went to a trauma center in Texas after being brutally attacked in California from “Teen Mom’s” hate watch commercials . Any retaliation is against the law & I stand by removing 145 episodes of 16&pregnant and teen mom until my forensic audit has been paid and corrected with my daughter Sophialabraham ’s payments, delinquent bonus payments that match public ratings facts. Sophia and all the children of the cast should be compensated for an intensive trauma recovery center as being placed in harms way on a hate watch edited show against our consent nor knowledge. Equal pay , favored nations is not in our contracts but in emails, calls, texts coercion by Sara prager, Larry Musnik, Morgan freeman and production accomplices of the scheme to suppress pay for teens, kids and adults, the scam is over, the trauma bonds are dead and I will show up for the next generation of talent on tv, entertainment reform is alive. Thank you to Netflix for your upcoming Teen Mom documentary and I’m happy you can’t be bought out by Paramount. #FarrahAbraham #TeenMom #ParamountPlus #ChildLaborLaws #paramountmerger

FARRAH ABRAHAM

21,609 views • 5 days ago

🚨 THE WORLD’S CENTRAL BANKERS ARE STARTING TO PANIC ABOUT AI. Not because AI is failing. Because the entire AI boom is now being built on debt, leverage, shadow banking, and financial structures that are starting to look disturbingly similar to 2008. The BIS just warned that an “AI bust” could trigger serious global financial instability. And once you look at the numbers, the concern starts making sense very quickly. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Google and Oracle are expected to spend more than $1 TRILLION on AI capex between 2025 and 2026 alone. For 2026 itself, hyperscaler AI spending is tracking around $750 BILLION. That is a 77% jump from already record levels last year. The problem? A massive part of this expansion is being financed through debt. Morgan Stanley estimates hyperscalers and AI joint ventures alone could generate $250–300 BILLION in debt issuance by 2026. AI-focused companies already secured at least $200 BILLION through debt financing in 2025. And some companies are now literally borrowing money using Nvidia GPUs as collateral. That is where things start getting dangerous. CoreWeave, one of the biggest AI infrastructure companies, now has liabilities above $21 BILLION after pioneering GPU-backed debt financing. Its entire structure depends on Nvidia chips holding value long enough for the debt to get repaid. But GPUs depreciate extremely fast. Every new Nvidia generation immediately weakens the value of the previous one. Which means billions in loans are now backed by hardware that can lose relevance before the debt even matures. And according to the BIS, the financing structures around AI are becoming increasingly opaque. The same assets may be pledged multiple times across different financing vehicles. That is exactly the type of circular leverage that made the 2008 system so fragile. At the same time, the actual economic returns from AI still remain largely unproven. Goldman Sachs found “basically zero” economy-wide productivity gains from AI in 2025 despite hundreds of billions already being spent. Only 1% of S&P 500 companies were even able to quantify any earnings impact from AI. Yet markets are behaving like the returns are already guaranteed. Now combine this with: • Global debt at a record $353 TRILLION • Inflation jumping back to 4.2% • Private credit stress already appearing • AI chip shortages • Data center bottlenecks • And AI valuations approaching dot-com bubble extremes according to the IMF, ECB, BIS and Bank of England. This is why central banks are suddenly sounding alarmed. Because if hyperscalers ever slow AI spending, the debt chain behind the entire boom starts getting tested immediately. And right now, the global financial system is more leveraged than ever.
0:28

🚨 THE WORLD’S CENTRAL BANKERS ARE STARTING TO PANIC ABOUT AI. Not because AI is failing. Because the entire AI boom is now being built on debt, leverage, shadow banking, and financial structures that are starting to look disturbingly similar to 2008. The BIS just warned that an “AI bust” could trigger serious global financial instability. And once you look at the numbers, the concern starts making sense very quickly. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Google and Oracle are expected to spend more than $1 TRILLION on AI capex between 2025 and 2026 alone. For 2026 itself, hyperscaler AI spending is tracking around $750 BILLION. That is a 77% jump from already record levels last year. The problem? A massive part of this expansion is being financed through debt. Morgan Stanley estimates hyperscalers and AI joint ventures alone could generate $250–300 BILLION in debt issuance by 2026. AI-focused companies already secured at least $200 BILLION through debt financing in 2025. And some companies are now literally borrowing money using Nvidia GPUs as collateral. That is where things start getting dangerous. CoreWeave, one of the biggest AI infrastructure companies, now has liabilities above $21 BILLION after pioneering GPU-backed debt financing. Its entire structure depends on Nvidia chips holding value long enough for the debt to get repaid. But GPUs depreciate extremely fast. Every new Nvidia generation immediately weakens the value of the previous one. Which means billions in loans are now backed by hardware that can lose relevance before the debt even matures. And according to the BIS, the financing structures around AI are becoming increasingly opaque. The same assets may be pledged multiple times across different financing vehicles. That is exactly the type of circular leverage that made the 2008 system so fragile. At the same time, the actual economic returns from AI still remain largely unproven. Goldman Sachs found “basically zero” economy-wide productivity gains from AI in 2025 despite hundreds of billions already being spent. Only 1% of S&P 500 companies were even able to quantify any earnings impact from AI. Yet markets are behaving like the returns are already guaranteed. Now combine this with: • Global debt at a record $353 TRILLION • Inflation jumping back to 4.2% • Private credit stress already appearing • AI chip shortages • Data center bottlenecks • And AI valuations approaching dot-com bubble extremes according to the IMF, ECB, BIS and Bank of England. This is why central banks are suddenly sounding alarmed. Because if hyperscalers ever slow AI spending, the debt chain behind the entire boom starts getting tested immediately. And right now, the global financial system is more leveraged than ever.

Crypto Rover

86,404 views • 2 months ago

In 45 years on Wall Street, I've never seen anything like this. Sam Altman just convinced 3 of the world's smartest investors to fund his losses. $110 billion. But ZERO profit in sight. The largest private funding round in history. Let me explain why this is borderline criminal & what you have to understand as an investor: Amazon. Nvidia. SoftBank. 3 of the world's most sophisticated investors just handed OpenAI $110 billion at an $840 billion valuation. That's more than double the $40 billion OpenAI raised last year. For context: all US venture capital combined invested $170 billion into American startups in all of 2023. Altman just raised 65% of that. Alone. In one round. And the company STILL isn't profitable. Let's look at the actual numbers: OpenAI burned $8 billion in 2025. They project burning $17 billion in 2026. $35 billion in 2027. $47 billion in 2028. Cumulative losses before any projected path to profitability: over $115 billion. Meanwhile, Amazon's $50 billion comes with strings attached. $35 billion is contingent on OpenAI either achieving AGI or completing its IPO by year end. Read that again. $35 billion is conditioned on ACHIEVING AGI. They're literally writing checks against a scientific breakthrough that may not happen on any predictable timeline. This is what peak cycle financing looks like. The circular logic every investor should understand: Amazon invests $50 billion in OpenAI. OpenAI commits to spending $100 billion on Amazon Web Services. Nvidia invests $30 billion. OpenAI commits to buying 3 gigawatts of Nvidia compute. These aren't arms-length investments. They're vendor financing dressed up as venture capital. Amazon and Nvidia are essentially paying OpenAI to buy their own products. The $840 billion valuation prices in a future that doesn't exist yet. At $13 billion in 2025 revenue, that's 65x revenue. Even in 2021 - the most speculative bubble in recent tech history - Snowflake peaked at 50-80x revenue. And Snowflake was actually profitable. J.P. Morgan calculates that the AI industry needs $650 billion in annual revenue just to generate a 10% return on total infrastructure buildout. The entire industry currently generates a fraction of that. I've seen cycles my entire 45-year career. The 1980s defense build-up. The dot-com bubble. The 2008 mortgage machine. The pattern is always the same: When the biggest players start financing each other's growth through circular investment structures, you're not witnessing a revolution... You're watching the LAST PHASE of a credit cycle. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said OpenAI is going to be "one of the very big winners long term." Maybe. But $840 billion assumes they've already won. Stock prices follow earnings. Always have. Always will. And right now, OpenAI's earnings are deeply, structurally, massively negative. The IPO is coming. The hype will peak. And the question every serious investor needs to answer is simple: At what price does this actually make sense? Sam Altman doesn’t know either - he just keeps raising money faster than he can burn it. This can’t end well.
1:14

In 45 years on Wall Street, I've never seen anything like this. Sam Altman just convinced 3 of the world's smartest investors to fund his losses. $110 billion. But ZERO profit in sight. The largest private funding round in history. Let me explain why this is borderline criminal & what you have to understand as an investor: Amazon. Nvidia. SoftBank. 3 of the world's most sophisticated investors just handed OpenAI $110 billion at an $840 billion valuation. That's more than double the $40 billion OpenAI raised last year. For context: all US venture capital combined invested $170 billion into American startups in all of 2023. Altman just raised 65% of that. Alone. In one round. And the company STILL isn't profitable. Let's look at the actual numbers: OpenAI burned $8 billion in 2025. They project burning $17 billion in 2026. $35 billion in 2027. $47 billion in 2028. Cumulative losses before any projected path to profitability: over $115 billion. Meanwhile, Amazon's $50 billion comes with strings attached. $35 billion is contingent on OpenAI either achieving AGI or completing its IPO by year end. Read that again. $35 billion is conditioned on ACHIEVING AGI. They're literally writing checks against a scientific breakthrough that may not happen on any predictable timeline. This is what peak cycle financing looks like. The circular logic every investor should understand: Amazon invests $50 billion in OpenAI. OpenAI commits to spending $100 billion on Amazon Web Services. Nvidia invests $30 billion. OpenAI commits to buying 3 gigawatts of Nvidia compute. These aren't arms-length investments. They're vendor financing dressed up as venture capital. Amazon and Nvidia are essentially paying OpenAI to buy their own products. The $840 billion valuation prices in a future that doesn't exist yet. At $13 billion in 2025 revenue, that's 65x revenue. Even in 2021 - the most speculative bubble in recent tech history - Snowflake peaked at 50-80x revenue. And Snowflake was actually profitable. J.P. Morgan calculates that the AI industry needs $650 billion in annual revenue just to generate a 10% return on total infrastructure buildout. The entire industry currently generates a fraction of that. I've seen cycles my entire 45-year career. The 1980s defense build-up. The dot-com bubble. The 2008 mortgage machine. The pattern is always the same: When the biggest players start financing each other's growth through circular investment structures, you're not witnessing a revolution... You're watching the LAST PHASE of a credit cycle. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said OpenAI is going to be "one of the very big winners long term." Maybe. But $840 billion assumes they've already won. Stock prices follow earnings. Always have. Always will. And right now, OpenAI's earnings are deeply, structurally, massively negative. The IPO is coming. The hype will peak. And the question every serious investor needs to answer is simple: At what price does this actually make sense? Sam Altman doesn’t know either - he just keeps raising money faster than he can burn it. This can’t end well.

George Noble

1,197,773 views • 6 months ago

On 1 August 2018, six Zimbabweans were gunned down by the army for protesting the delay in election results. The world watched in horror as it unfolded live on international television. Many ask why Zimbabweans no longer take to the streets. The answer is simple—they once did. And they were met not only with bullets from the regime, but with betrayal from the very man they were defending. Nelson Chamisa, then the opposition leader leading the MDC Alliance, said of the protesters: “It was very stupid even for people who demonstrated. To demonstrate for the results to be released, it was stupid… I am not insulting them, but… it was premature, it was unstrategic, and open to be manipulated by the enemy.” Those words struck deeper, way-way deeper than many imagine because they came from the mouth of hope. Unless this betrayal is acknowledged and those words walked back, Zimbabweans will not rise. Not because they are cowards, but because the last time they stood up in huge numbers, they were shot down by the regime; and told they were “stupid” by the leader they thought they were standing up for. When bullets kill the body and words kill the spirit, what then do you expect of the people left behind in Zimbabwe? There is a long and painful history of betrayal by the opposition. In 2008, I was the first journalist to break the story of post-election violence on South Africa’s eNCA news station. Over 400 lives were lost, yet the opposition; then led by Morgan Tsvangirai, did nothing meaningful to support the victims. Instead, they entered government and enjoyed the perks of power. Nelson Chamisa even gave an interview to The Globe and Mail of Canada, justifying the need for expensive cars in the GNU because, according to him, such cars brought “respect.” That one interview told the story of a movement that had shifted from the people to self-interest. They forgot the very communities that had risked everything to vote them into power. And that is precisely why those communities will no longer put their lives on the line for politicians who abandon them at the first taste of comfort. Until this betrayal is addressed—until opposition leaders begin to fight back with integrity and sacrifice; ZANUPF will remain in power, sustained not only by fear, but by the absence of a credible alternative willing to confront it. The current government of Zimbabwe will never change; but Nelson Chamisa has an opportunity to fix the mess he created by calling citizens fighting for a fair election; STUPID. He must confront the hard truth that real leadership begins with accountability. He needs to publicly acknowledge that calling the 2018 protesters “stupid” was a betrayal of the very people who risked their lives for democracy. He must campaign for the Motlanthe Report to be implemented and for the victims’ families to be fully compensated. One of the family members wrote to me, telling me they have no one helping them. After such deliberate betrayals, those around them will never take to the streets again.
0:50

On 1 August 2018, six Zimbabweans were gunned down by the army for protesting the delay in election results. The world watched in horror as it unfolded live on international television. Many ask why Zimbabweans no longer take to the streets. The answer is simple—they once did. And they were met not only with bullets from the regime, but with betrayal from the very man they were defending. Nelson Chamisa, then the opposition leader leading the MDC Alliance, said of the protesters: “It was very stupid even for people who demonstrated. To demonstrate for the results to be released, it was stupid… I am not insulting them, but… it was premature, it was unstrategic, and open to be manipulated by the enemy.” Those words struck deeper, way-way deeper than many imagine because they came from the mouth of hope. Unless this betrayal is acknowledged and those words walked back, Zimbabweans will not rise. Not because they are cowards, but because the last time they stood up in huge numbers, they were shot down by the regime; and told they were “stupid” by the leader they thought they were standing up for. When bullets kill the body and words kill the spirit, what then do you expect of the people left behind in Zimbabwe? There is a long and painful history of betrayal by the opposition. In 2008, I was the first journalist to break the story of post-election violence on South Africa’s eNCA news station. Over 400 lives were lost, yet the opposition; then led by Morgan Tsvangirai, did nothing meaningful to support the victims. Instead, they entered government and enjoyed the perks of power. Nelson Chamisa even gave an interview to The Globe and Mail of Canada, justifying the need for expensive cars in the GNU because, according to him, such cars brought “respect.” That one interview told the story of a movement that had shifted from the people to self-interest. They forgot the very communities that had risked everything to vote them into power. And that is precisely why those communities will no longer put their lives on the line for politicians who abandon them at the first taste of comfort. Until this betrayal is addressed—until opposition leaders begin to fight back with integrity and sacrifice; ZANUPF will remain in power, sustained not only by fear, but by the absence of a credible alternative willing to confront it. The current government of Zimbabwe will never change; but Nelson Chamisa has an opportunity to fix the mess he created by calling citizens fighting for a fair election; STUPID. He must confront the hard truth that real leadership begins with accountability. He needs to publicly acknowledge that calling the 2018 protesters “stupid” was a betrayal of the very people who risked their lives for democracy. He must campaign for the Motlanthe Report to be implemented and for the victims’ families to be fully compensated. One of the family members wrote to me, telling me they have no one helping them. After such deliberate betrayals, those around them will never take to the streets again.

Hopewell Chin’ono

78,864 views • 1 year ago

Today, April 4th, is the anniversary of MLK Jr. giving his infamous anti-Vietnam War speech in 1967, calling for US withdrawal & announcing his intent to leverage his national organization towards that political end. Exactly one year later, on April 4, 1968, he was ass*ssinated by the alleged lone gunman James Earl Ray. If you think that date is a coincidence, you might think your targeted Facebook ads are a coincidence, too! Lol (note the "anniversary date" pattern) However, Ray never received a full & proper trial and always maintained his innocence. After he died in 1998 (still trying to get legal recourse), the King Family sued to discover the truth, and in 1999 a jury determined that MLK had been k*lled in a government-led conspiracy—but you're not supposed to remember that or talk about it. And the Mockingbird media will tell you that verdict doesn't mean anything. Back in 1967, MLK Jr. had been advised by his long-time jewish handler Stanley Levison that opposing the war would lose his organization—the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)—the massive financial support it then enjoyed from the jewish community. Sure enough, after he publicly opposed the war, much of the big jewish donor money dried up. Sound familiar? In addition, he was attacked by former Civil Rights allies & partners who denounced him for his anti-Vietnam war stance: ▪️The NAACP--founded, funded, led by ✡️s ▪️The New York Times, (owned by the Sulzberger Family ✡️) ▪️The Washington Post (Owned by Katherine Meyer Graham ✡️) ▪️His longtime ally, Ralph Bunche, winner of the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize for helping negotiate the settlement between israel & the Arabs--done so mostly while shooting pool with israeli IDF Commander Moshe Dayan ✡️! ▪️The American jewish Committee, the American jewish Congress, the ADL, and the extremely pro-War/zionist Johnson administration all criticized him and distanced themselves from him, too. At the time, MLK was somewhat confused by some of this turnabout, but that's because he never realized that a major component of the Vietnam War was the pro-israel/zionist agenda behind it. Vietnam was what we'd call a "Neocon" war now, before the term was invented. MLK had stepped in the middle of a massive jewish/Military Industrial Complex project feeding the American War Machine for israel's benefit and the MIC's bottom line. The same synergy at play today. So MLK was getting blowback from jewish donors & zionists just as Charlie Kirk did for his own turns against the pro-israel cause. Also like Charlie Kirk, MLK commanded a large & extremely influential organization with a national footprint. His SCLC was comprised of over 300 chapters across dozens of states, and required 100-200 full-time staff to manage. It was responsible for hundreds of thousands of voter registrations and helped swing millions of votes. In addition, King was closely considering lending his support to an independent 3rd party in 1968 before he was ass*ssinated. Recall, too, that Charlie Kirk was seriously considering a 2026 run for Governor of Arizona, for which he'd have surely been a favorite. But of course we can't have independent political movements not under the control of "The Regime." Conscientious objectors must be brought in line. Or else. FURTHER COMPARISONS & SUMMARY NOTES ▪️JFK had already initiated US troop withdrawal from Vietnam when he was ass*ssinated (NSAM-263). LBJ immediately reversed that decision the day after JFK's funeral (NSAM 273). ▪️RFK had also been campaigning on ending the Vietnam War when he was ass*ssinated just 2 months after MLK, on the 1-year anniversary of the 6-Day War. Allegedly, this was by the design of Sirhan Sirhan, the lone-gunman (patsy). ▪️Charlie Kirk was extremely vocal in opposing the Iran & Ukraine Wars, (and all Neocon Wars in general, as he described them), and was turning against the pro-israel cause. He was assassinated on the eve of the anniversary of 9/11, which was used to launch the War on Terror (for israel). I'd also point out that in late 1967, MLK Jr. changed his mind on supporting israel, and had canceled his much anticipated trip to israel set for that November. Remember how Charlie had also spurned Netanyahu's last invite to israel? The parallels are crazy. What's more likely: that history is randomly repeating itself, or that it's the same evil perpetrators performing these ass*ssinations & repeating their same playbook?
2:48

Today, April 4th, is the anniversary of MLK Jr. giving his infamous anti-Vietnam War speech in 1967, calling for US withdrawal & announcing his intent to leverage his national organization towards that political end. Exactly one year later, on April 4, 1968, he was ass*ssinated by the alleged lone gunman James Earl Ray. If you think that date is a coincidence, you might think your targeted Facebook ads are a coincidence, too! Lol (note the "anniversary date" pattern) However, Ray never received a full & proper trial and always maintained his innocence. After he died in 1998 (still trying to get legal recourse), the King Family sued to discover the truth, and in 1999 a jury determined that MLK had been k*lled in a government-led conspiracy—but you're not supposed to remember that or talk about it. And the Mockingbird media will tell you that verdict doesn't mean anything. Back in 1967, MLK Jr. had been advised by his long-time jewish handler Stanley Levison that opposing the war would lose his organization—the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)—the massive financial support it then enjoyed from the jewish community. Sure enough, after he publicly opposed the war, much of the big jewish donor money dried up. Sound familiar? In addition, he was attacked by former Civil Rights allies & partners who denounced him for his anti-Vietnam war stance: ▪️The NAACP--founded, funded, led by ✡️s ▪️The New York Times, (owned by the Sulzberger Family ✡️) ▪️The Washington Post (Owned by Katherine Meyer Graham ✡️) ▪️His longtime ally, Ralph Bunche, winner of the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize for helping negotiate the settlement between israel & the Arabs--done so mostly while shooting pool with israeli IDF Commander Moshe Dayan ✡️! ▪️The American jewish Committee, the American jewish Congress, the ADL, and the extremely pro-War/zionist Johnson administration all criticized him and distanced themselves from him, too. At the time, MLK was somewhat confused by some of this turnabout, but that's because he never realized that a major component of the Vietnam War was the pro-israel/zionist agenda behind it. Vietnam was what we'd call a "Neocon" war now, before the term was invented. MLK had stepped in the middle of a massive jewish/Military Industrial Complex project feeding the American War Machine for israel's benefit and the MIC's bottom line. The same synergy at play today. So MLK was getting blowback from jewish donors & zionists just as Charlie Kirk did for his own turns against the pro-israel cause. Also like Charlie Kirk, MLK commanded a large & extremely influential organization with a national footprint. His SCLC was comprised of over 300 chapters across dozens of states, and required 100-200 full-time staff to manage. It was responsible for hundreds of thousands of voter registrations and helped swing millions of votes. In addition, King was closely considering lending his support to an independent 3rd party in 1968 before he was ass*ssinated. Recall, too, that Charlie Kirk was seriously considering a 2026 run for Governor of Arizona, for which he'd have surely been a favorite. But of course we can't have independent political movements not under the control of "The Regime." Conscientious objectors must be brought in line. Or else. FURTHER COMPARISONS & SUMMARY NOTES ▪️JFK had already initiated US troop withdrawal from Vietnam when he was ass*ssinated (NSAM-263). LBJ immediately reversed that decision the day after JFK's funeral (NSAM 273). ▪️RFK had also been campaigning on ending the Vietnam War when he was ass*ssinated just 2 months after MLK, on the 1-year anniversary of the 6-Day War. Allegedly, this was by the design of Sirhan Sirhan, the lone-gunman (patsy). ▪️Charlie Kirk was extremely vocal in opposing the Iran & Ukraine Wars, (and all Neocon Wars in general, as he described them), and was turning against the pro-israel cause. He was assassinated on the eve of the anniversary of 9/11, which was used to launch the War on Terror (for israel). I'd also point out that in late 1967, MLK Jr. changed his mind on supporting israel, and had canceled his much anticipated trip to israel set for that November. Remember how Charlie had also spurned Netanyahu's last invite to israel? The parallels are crazy. What's more likely: that history is randomly repeating itself, or that it's the same evil perpetrators performing these ass*ssinations & repeating their same playbook?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

102,292 views • 4 months ago

The Nicki Minaj–Lil’ Kim beef is a long-running hip-hop rivalry driven by accusations of style theft, lack of homage, Cash Money industry friction, and competing claims to the “Queen of Rap” title‼️. It peaked publicly around 2009–2011 and has never fully resolved‼️. Early roots (2007–2009)‼️ Comparisons started when Nicki’s 2007 "Playtime Is Over" promo images and 2008 "Sucka Free" cover closely mirrored Lil’ Kim’s iconic 1996 "Hard Core" look‼️. Fans saw Nicki emulating Kim’s racy image, flow, and aesthetic‼️. Nicki rejected the “new Lil’ Kim” label while giving shout-outs‼️. Their first meeting accounts differ‼️. Nicki says she approached Kim backstage at a Lil Wayne concert (~2009), asked if everything was good, and they took pictures‼️. Kim has denied that version and said she was initially nice to Nicki‼️. In late 2009 both appeared on Birdman’s “Grindin’ Makin’ Money.” Kim has said this came amid talks with Cash Money/Slim Williams about a partnership‼️. She recorded her verse quickly, expected a bigger push, then felt the track was sidelined once the label had her “stamp.”‼️She later claimed Nicki’s sound and records felt like they were taking the direction she was developing, and that Nicki became “catty.”‼️ Kim also described an encounter at Diddy’s son’s birthday party where Nicki allegedly eye-rolled and ignored her after the collab‼️. Escalation (2010–2011)‼️ As Nicki’s career exploded with "Pink Friday", Kim publicly accused her of not paying proper homage, taking subliminals, and cloning her without credit‼️. Kim framed it as disrespect from a younger artist who benefited from the path she helped clear‼️. Nicki’s “Roman’s Revenge” (with Eminem) was widely read as targeting Kim (“That bitch mad cuz I took the spot…”)‼️. Nicki has said a veteran came at her, she had repeatedly praised Kim (and Foxy, Remy) early on, and she responded because she had to protect her career and “feed her family.”‼️ Kim fired back with the "Black Friday" mixtape (a play on "Pink Friday") and direct disses‼️. Nicki later dropped “Tragedy,” mocking Kim’s independent sales and career trajectory‼️. Interviews continued the shots—Kim vowed not to take her foot off Nicki’s neck; Nicki mixed respect with warnings about picking fights and told Kim to put out Billboard-level music first‼️. Later years⁉️ The heaviest track-for-track phase cooled, but tension lingered‼️. Kim released a “Flawless” remix/cover dissing Nicki’s “Queen of Rap” claim and replacing her image‼️. She later aligned with Remy Ma during Remy’s beef with Nicki‼️. Occasional soft moments appeared (Kim voiced some support for "Queen" in 2018), but the rivalry never fully ended‼️. In 2024 Nicki blasted her former manager Deb Antney for reaching out to Kim behind her back to try to squash the beef, saying she never asked for it and did not want that associated with her‼️. Kim’s core view⁉️: She was initially open and nice (including the Cash Money collab)‼️. Nicki and the label studied/took her swag without lasting respect, then threw subliminals once established‼️. She felt used for credibility‼️. Nicki’s core view⁉️: She repeatedly credited and praised Kim early. A veteran attacked her; she hit back in self-defense‼️. She rejects being cast only as the disrespectful newcomer and says the dominant narrative ignores her early praise‼️. It remains classic generational tension mixed with industry politics, image parallels, and ego around legacy‼️. Both have acknowledged the other’s talent at points, but personal friction has blocked full public reconciliation‼️💯.
2:03

The Nicki Minaj–Lil’ Kim beef is a long-running hip-hop rivalry driven by accusations of style theft, lack of homage, Cash Money industry friction, and competing claims to the “Queen of Rap” title‼️. It peaked publicly around 2009–2011 and has never fully resolved‼️. Early roots (2007–2009)‼️ Comparisons started when Nicki’s 2007 "Playtime Is Over" promo images and 2008 "Sucka Free" cover closely mirrored Lil’ Kim’s iconic 1996 "Hard Core" look‼️. Fans saw Nicki emulating Kim’s racy image, flow, and aesthetic‼️. Nicki rejected the “new Lil’ Kim” label while giving shout-outs‼️. Their first meeting accounts differ‼️. Nicki says she approached Kim backstage at a Lil Wayne concert (~2009), asked if everything was good, and they took pictures‼️. Kim has denied that version and said she was initially nice to Nicki‼️. In late 2009 both appeared on Birdman’s “Grindin’ Makin’ Money.” Kim has said this came amid talks with Cash Money/Slim Williams about a partnership‼️. She recorded her verse quickly, expected a bigger push, then felt the track was sidelined once the label had her “stamp.”‼️She later claimed Nicki’s sound and records felt like they were taking the direction she was developing, and that Nicki became “catty.”‼️ Kim also described an encounter at Diddy’s son’s birthday party where Nicki allegedly eye-rolled and ignored her after the collab‼️. Escalation (2010–2011)‼️ As Nicki’s career exploded with "Pink Friday", Kim publicly accused her of not paying proper homage, taking subliminals, and cloning her without credit‼️. Kim framed it as disrespect from a younger artist who benefited from the path she helped clear‼️. Nicki’s “Roman’s Revenge” (with Eminem) was widely read as targeting Kim (“That bitch mad cuz I took the spot…”)‼️. Nicki has said a veteran came at her, she had repeatedly praised Kim (and Foxy, Remy) early on, and she responded because she had to protect her career and “feed her family.”‼️ Kim fired back with the "Black Friday" mixtape (a play on "Pink Friday") and direct disses‼️. Nicki later dropped “Tragedy,” mocking Kim’s independent sales and career trajectory‼️. Interviews continued the shots—Kim vowed not to take her foot off Nicki’s neck; Nicki mixed respect with warnings about picking fights and told Kim to put out Billboard-level music first‼️. Later years⁉️ The heaviest track-for-track phase cooled, but tension lingered‼️. Kim released a “Flawless” remix/cover dissing Nicki’s “Queen of Rap” claim and replacing her image‼️. She later aligned with Remy Ma during Remy’s beef with Nicki‼️. Occasional soft moments appeared (Kim voiced some support for "Queen" in 2018), but the rivalry never fully ended‼️. In 2024 Nicki blasted her former manager Deb Antney for reaching out to Kim behind her back to try to squash the beef, saying she never asked for it and did not want that associated with her‼️. Kim’s core view⁉️: She was initially open and nice (including the Cash Money collab)‼️. Nicki and the label studied/took her swag without lasting respect, then threw subliminals once established‼️. She felt used for credibility‼️. Nicki’s core view⁉️: She repeatedly credited and praised Kim early. A veteran attacked her; she hit back in self-defense‼️. She rejects being cast only as the disrespectful newcomer and says the dominant narrative ignores her early praise‼️. It remains classic generational tension mixed with industry politics, image parallels, and ego around legacy‼️. Both have acknowledged the other’s talent at points, but personal friction has blocked full public reconciliation‼️💯.

(st_ides)

25,313 views • 11 days ago

I have seen many of my followers on social media asking why Ghana and Nigeria have been vocal about the xenophobic and Afrophobic attacks against Africans living in South Africa, while Zimbabwe and Mozambique have remained largely silent. The answer, in my view, lies in politics. For years, the South African government and, in particular, the African National Congress (ANC), have consistently defended ZANUPF in Zimbabwe and FRELIMO in Mozambique. They have defended disputed and rigged elections, stood by those governments during periods of political repression, and maintained close political relationships despite repeated allegations of corruption, human rights abuses and democratic backsliding. A good example is 2008, when then South African President Thabo Mbeki insisted there was “no crisis” in Zimbabwe, despite widespread political violence and hundreds of Zimbabweans being butchered following the disputed election in which Morgan Tsvangirai and the MDC had outpolled ZANUPF in the first round. South Africa’s policy of “quiet diplomacy” was widely criticised for shielding the Zimbabwean government from stronger regional pressure. Against that background, it is difficult to expect Harare or Maputo to publicly confront the ANC-led government over the treatment of their citizens in South Africa. The political relationships between those governing parties are deep and longstanding. Criticising Pretoria would inevitably strain alliances that have existed for decades and bring to the fore the root causes of illegal immigration in South Africa. Ghana and Nigeria occupy a different political position. They do not depend on the ANC for political legitimacy or regional backing in the same way. Both countries have experienced regular transfers of power through competitive elections, and neither government relies on South Africa to validate its democratic credentials. As a result, Accra and Abuja have greater political space to speak out when they believe their citizens are being mistreated abroad. That difference helps explain why the strongest official reactions have come from Ghana and Nigeria, while Harare and Maputo have been far more restrained. There is also another important reality. The overwhelming majority of migrants from elsewhere in Africa living in South Africa come from neighbouring countries, particularly Zimbabwe and Mozambique. That geographical reality means those two countries are central to any discussion about migration into South Africa. Their governments know this, which makes their diplomatic position even more complicated. As I have argued before, South Africa’s immigration challenges are genuine and deserve serious policy solutions. However, genuine domestic problems can also be exploited by external actors seeking to deepen divisions or damage South Africa’s international standing as Israel is now doing. Recognising that possibility does not mean denying that the underlying challenges are real. It means understanding that geopolitical actors often exploit existing fault lines rather than creating them from scratch. Whether one agrees with my analysis or not, I hope this explains why the official responses from Accra and Abuja have been much louder than those from Harare and Maputo. Back home in Southern Africa, Botswana has also been very vocal against xenophobia and Afrophobia. Its President has publicly condemned attacks on African nationals living in South Africa. The ruling party in Botswana even invited South African opposition leader Julius Malema, who has consistently spoken out against Afrophobia and the targeting of fellow Africans, to address its annual conference this past week. Botswana is able to do this because it is a functioning democracy. Unlike Zimbabwe and Mozambique, it has never depended on South Africa or the African National Congress (ANC) for political backing after disputed or rigged elections, allegations of electoral manipulation or the repression of its own citizens. It therefore has far greater diplomatic freedom to criticise South Africa when it believes fellow Africans are being mistreated. That is why Botswana, like Ghana and Nigeria, has been prepared to speak out against what it perceives as black-on-black violence directed at African migrants. By contrast, the governments in Harare and Maputo have remained largely silent, reflecting the long-standing political relationships between their ruling parties and the ANC, which publicly backs rigged elections. None of this requires a rocket scientist to understand. It simply requires an appreciation of how regional politics, diplomatic alliances and political interests shape the public positions that governments take. Those who are prepared to look beyond the headlines and understand the underlying dynamics will appreciate the point. Those who focus only on the symptoms, while ignoring the political relationships and incentives that produce them, will continue to wander aimlessly through the political wilderness.
3:24

I have seen many of my followers on social media asking why Ghana and Nigeria have been vocal about the xenophobic and Afrophobic attacks against Africans living in South Africa, while Zimbabwe and Mozambique have remained largely silent. The answer, in my view, lies in politics. For years, the South African government and, in particular, the African National Congress (ANC), have consistently defended ZANUPF in Zimbabwe and FRELIMO in Mozambique. They have defended disputed and rigged elections, stood by those governments during periods of political repression, and maintained close political relationships despite repeated allegations of corruption, human rights abuses and democratic backsliding. A good example is 2008, when then South African President Thabo Mbeki insisted there was “no crisis” in Zimbabwe, despite widespread political violence and hundreds of Zimbabweans being butchered following the disputed election in which Morgan Tsvangirai and the MDC had outpolled ZANUPF in the first round. South Africa’s policy of “quiet diplomacy” was widely criticised for shielding the Zimbabwean government from stronger regional pressure. Against that background, it is difficult to expect Harare or Maputo to publicly confront the ANC-led government over the treatment of their citizens in South Africa. The political relationships between those governing parties are deep and longstanding. Criticising Pretoria would inevitably strain alliances that have existed for decades and bring to the fore the root causes of illegal immigration in South Africa. Ghana and Nigeria occupy a different political position. They do not depend on the ANC for political legitimacy or regional backing in the same way. Both countries have experienced regular transfers of power through competitive elections, and neither government relies on South Africa to validate its democratic credentials. As a result, Accra and Abuja have greater political space to speak out when they believe their citizens are being mistreated abroad. That difference helps explain why the strongest official reactions have come from Ghana and Nigeria, while Harare and Maputo have been far more restrained. There is also another important reality. The overwhelming majority of migrants from elsewhere in Africa living in South Africa come from neighbouring countries, particularly Zimbabwe and Mozambique. That geographical reality means those two countries are central to any discussion about migration into South Africa. Their governments know this, which makes their diplomatic position even more complicated. As I have argued before, South Africa’s immigration challenges are genuine and deserve serious policy solutions. However, genuine domestic problems can also be exploited by external actors seeking to deepen divisions or damage South Africa’s international standing as Israel is now doing. Recognising that possibility does not mean denying that the underlying challenges are real. It means understanding that geopolitical actors often exploit existing fault lines rather than creating them from scratch. Whether one agrees with my analysis or not, I hope this explains why the official responses from Accra and Abuja have been much louder than those from Harare and Maputo. Back home in Southern Africa, Botswana has also been very vocal against xenophobia and Afrophobia. Its President has publicly condemned attacks on African nationals living in South Africa. The ruling party in Botswana even invited South African opposition leader Julius Malema, who has consistently spoken out against Afrophobia and the targeting of fellow Africans, to address its annual conference this past week. Botswana is able to do this because it is a functioning democracy. Unlike Zimbabwe and Mozambique, it has never depended on South Africa or the African National Congress (ANC) for political backing after disputed or rigged elections, allegations of electoral manipulation or the repression of its own citizens. It therefore has far greater diplomatic freedom to criticise South Africa when it believes fellow Africans are being mistreated. That is why Botswana, like Ghana and Nigeria, has been prepared to speak out against what it perceives as black-on-black violence directed at African migrants. By contrast, the governments in Harare and Maputo have remained largely silent, reflecting the long-standing political relationships between their ruling parties and the ANC, which publicly backs rigged elections. None of this requires a rocket scientist to understand. It simply requires an appreciation of how regional politics, diplomatic alliances and political interests shape the public positions that governments take. Those who are prepared to look beyond the headlines and understand the underlying dynamics will appreciate the point. Those who focus only on the symptoms, while ignoring the political relationships and incentives that produce them, will continue to wander aimlessly through the political wilderness.

Hopewell Chin’ono

93,783 views • 1 month ago

I can't believe that the once richest man on earth just bet his entire empire on ONE company. And he has 9 days to pull it off. SoftBank is scrambling to deliver $22.5 billion to OpenAI by December 31st. To get there, CEO Masayoshi Son sold his ENTIRE stake in the best-performing AI stock on the planet. Then sold billions more in other holdings. Cut staff. Froze dealmaking. Borrowed against everything he owns. This is the biggest all-in bet in the past few years. And it might be the most reckless financial engineering since 2008. Here's what's actually happening: SoftBank promised OpenAI $40 billion back in April when the company was valued at $300 billion. The deal had conditions. OpenAI had to convert to a for-profit structure by year-end. They did that in October. Now the clock is ticking. $22.5 billion must arrive in 9 days or the deal breaks. Son already delivered $17.5 billion earlier this year. Getting the rest is proving harder than anyone expected. The moves Son made to raise the cash are absolutely wild: He dumped SoftBank's entire $5.8 billion position in Nvidia. Not trimmed. Not reduced. LIQUIDATED. The same Nvidia that's been printing money for AI investors all year. He sold $4.8 billion worth of T-Mobile shares. Slashed staff across the company. And the Vision Fund that used to write checks for everything? Dead. Any deal over $50 million now requires Son's personal approval. Investment managers who used to hunt for the next big thing are now working full-time on the OpenAI transaction. But it still wasn't enough cash... So Son went to the debt markets. He expanded SoftBank's margin loan capacity by $6.5 billion, bringing total undrawn capacity to $11.5 billion. All of it backed by Arm Holdings stock. If Arm's stock drops, those loans get called. SoftBank faces margin calls. The whole thing unravels. And the risk gets crazier. OpenAI's valuation has tripled since April. Started at $300 billion. Now heading toward $900 billion according to sources. Amazon is reportedly joining the next round. On paper, SoftBank's investment looks brilliant. A 3X return in 8 months. But here's the thing: OpenAI is hemorrhaging cash at a rate that makes Uber's losses look responsible. The company generates $13 billion in annual revenue. Impressive... right? But they're literally projected to LOSE $74 billion by 2028. Not break even with losses. Not approach profitability. $74 billion in the red. Their revenue is growing. Their losses are growing faster. Because AI compute costs don't scale down. They scale UP. Every new ChatGPT user costs OpenAI money. Every API call burns cash. Every model training run requires millions in compute. Sam Altman told employees OpenAI is now in "code red" mode. Pausing all other product launches to focus entirely on beating Google's Gemini. That's the language of desperation. And Altman's long-term vision is even more expensive. He wants to build 30 gigawatts of AI compute capacity. Cost: $1.4 TRILLION. For context, that's larger than Mexico's entire GDP. He wants to add 1 gigawat every single week. Each gigawatt costs over $40 billion. The math doesn't work. The business model doesn't work. The capital requirements are impossible. But Son is betting everything anyway. Why would he do this? Because if it works, he owns the future. If OpenAI becomes the infrastructure layer for the next 20 years of computing, that $22.5 billion turns into trillions. SoftBank becomes the kingmaker of AI. Son becomes the most powerful investor in history. But if it fails? SoftBank vaporizes. The Nvidia stake is gone. Can't get it back. The T-Mobile shares are gone. The margin loans against Arm come due. Son has systematically dismantled his portfolio to concentrate everything into one bet. This is the opposite of diversification. This is the opposite of prudent risk management. This is a founder going all-in on a vision that everyone else thinks is insane. And he might be right. Other investors see it too. That's why OpenAI's valuation tripled in 8 months. BlackRock, Fidelity, and JP Morgan are all writing massive checks to private AI companies. Databricks just raised $4 billion at a $134 billion valuation. The entire market is betting that AI infrastructure will define the next decade. But the difference? They're diversifying. Spreading risk. Building portfolios. Son put everything on one company. The deadline is December 31st. In 9 days, we'll know if SoftBank pulled it off. If they deliver the $22.5 billion on time, the bet stays alive. If they miss the deadline, the deal could collapse. The terms could change. Competitors could swoop in. And Son will have sold the farm for nothing. This is either: The greatest venture bet in history. Or the most reckless financial move since Lehman Brothers. There's no middle ground. Masayoshi Son doesn't do middle ground. He bet big on Alibaba in 2000 and turned $20 million into $60 billion. He bet big on WeWork and lost $14 billion. Now he's betting bigger than ever. $22.5 billion. 9 days. Everything on the line. What would you do?
1:06

I can't believe that the once richest man on earth just bet his entire empire on ONE company. And he has 9 days to pull it off. SoftBank is scrambling to deliver $22.5 billion to OpenAI by December 31st. To get there, CEO Masayoshi Son sold his ENTIRE stake in the best-performing AI stock on the planet. Then sold billions more in other holdings. Cut staff. Froze dealmaking. Borrowed against everything he owns. This is the biggest all-in bet in the past few years. And it might be the most reckless financial engineering since 2008. Here's what's actually happening: SoftBank promised OpenAI $40 billion back in April when the company was valued at $300 billion. The deal had conditions. OpenAI had to convert to a for-profit structure by year-end. They did that in October. Now the clock is ticking. $22.5 billion must arrive in 9 days or the deal breaks. Son already delivered $17.5 billion earlier this year. Getting the rest is proving harder than anyone expected. The moves Son made to raise the cash are absolutely wild: He dumped SoftBank's entire $5.8 billion position in Nvidia. Not trimmed. Not reduced. LIQUIDATED. The same Nvidia that's been printing money for AI investors all year. He sold $4.8 billion worth of T-Mobile shares. Slashed staff across the company. And the Vision Fund that used to write checks for everything? Dead. Any deal over $50 million now requires Son's personal approval. Investment managers who used to hunt for the next big thing are now working full-time on the OpenAI transaction. But it still wasn't enough cash... So Son went to the debt markets. He expanded SoftBank's margin loan capacity by $6.5 billion, bringing total undrawn capacity to $11.5 billion. All of it backed by Arm Holdings stock. If Arm's stock drops, those loans get called. SoftBank faces margin calls. The whole thing unravels. And the risk gets crazier. OpenAI's valuation has tripled since April. Started at $300 billion. Now heading toward $900 billion according to sources. Amazon is reportedly joining the next round. On paper, SoftBank's investment looks brilliant. A 3X return in 8 months. But here's the thing: OpenAI is hemorrhaging cash at a rate that makes Uber's losses look responsible. The company generates $13 billion in annual revenue. Impressive... right? But they're literally projected to LOSE $74 billion by 2028. Not break even with losses. Not approach profitability. $74 billion in the red. Their revenue is growing. Their losses are growing faster. Because AI compute costs don't scale down. They scale UP. Every new ChatGPT user costs OpenAI money. Every API call burns cash. Every model training run requires millions in compute. Sam Altman told employees OpenAI is now in "code red" mode. Pausing all other product launches to focus entirely on beating Google's Gemini. That's the language of desperation. And Altman's long-term vision is even more expensive. He wants to build 30 gigawatts of AI compute capacity. Cost: $1.4 TRILLION. For context, that's larger than Mexico's entire GDP. He wants to add 1 gigawat every single week. Each gigawatt costs over $40 billion. The math doesn't work. The business model doesn't work. The capital requirements are impossible. But Son is betting everything anyway. Why would he do this? Because if it works, he owns the future. If OpenAI becomes the infrastructure layer for the next 20 years of computing, that $22.5 billion turns into trillions. SoftBank becomes the kingmaker of AI. Son becomes the most powerful investor in history. But if it fails? SoftBank vaporizes. The Nvidia stake is gone. Can't get it back. The T-Mobile shares are gone. The margin loans against Arm come due. Son has systematically dismantled his portfolio to concentrate everything into one bet. This is the opposite of diversification. This is the opposite of prudent risk management. This is a founder going all-in on a vision that everyone else thinks is insane. And he might be right. Other investors see it too. That's why OpenAI's valuation tripled in 8 months. BlackRock, Fidelity, and JP Morgan are all writing massive checks to private AI companies. Databricks just raised $4 billion at a $134 billion valuation. The entire market is betting that AI infrastructure will define the next decade. But the difference? They're diversifying. Spreading risk. Building portfolios. Son put everything on one company. The deadline is December 31st. In 9 days, we'll know if SoftBank pulled it off. If they deliver the $22.5 billion on time, the bet stays alive. If they miss the deadline, the deal could collapse. The terms could change. Competitors could swoop in. And Son will have sold the farm for nothing. This is either: The greatest venture bet in history. Or the most reckless financial move since Lehman Brothers. There's no middle ground. Masayoshi Son doesn't do middle ground. He bet big on Alibaba in 2000 and turned $20 million into $60 billion. He bet big on WeWork and lost $14 billion. Now he's betting bigger than ever. $22.5 billion. 9 days. Everything on the line. What would you do?

Ricardo

1,880,981 views • 8 months ago