Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Censorship Industry Decoded, Ep. 2: Proxies, Pretexts & Predicates In this vid, I explain a handy set of concepts as a guide to the brain of the typical "censorship industry insider" at stakeholder meetings & thought leader deliberations on what to censor next & how to do it.

157,097 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Quinster
Quinstervor 3 Jahren

Mike, fantastic message. ‘Democracy changed from consensus of the individuals to consensus of the institutions’ 🔥 I had to dig though hundreds of your posts to find this Part2 to your pinned post. Others likely looking for it too. Consider adding it to your pinned post

Profilbild von Newbomb Turk's Punch
Newbomb Turk's Punchvor 3 Jahren

Thanks for reposting this and laying this out in an articulate manner with layman's terms that a goof like me can understand.

Profilbild von Victor Poulos
Victor Poulosvor 3 Jahren

Brexit and Trump (populist uprisings) broke the brains of the western elites. A no holds barred reactionary neo-communism is and continues to be the response.

Profilbild von Jim Odell
Jim Odellvor 1 Jahr

Wow! Mike you are so thorough and detailed in your analysis. Your understanding of the long history of censorship is amazing. I’ve said this before, you are a national treasure.

Profilbild von Victor Poulos
Victor Poulosvor 3 Jahren

"Climate Change" is a predicate.

Profilbild von Shiloh
Shilohvor 3 Jahren

Wow! Scary stuff. Makes Joseph Goebbels look like an amateur.

Profilbild von Connie Cain
Connie Cainvor 2 Jahren

I do not understand how one group can change the definition of "democracy" without letting everyone else know. Let me check my on-line dictionary.

Profilbild von Karen Lea
Karen Leavor 1 Jahr

@ScottAdamsSays I learn so much listening to Mike Benz

Profilbild von Ghost of the Kerner Optics Bldgs
Ghost of the Kerner Optics Bldgsvor 3 Jahren

u gotta cut these vids down. 2min at most.

Ähnliche Videos

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren