Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Yes. And CEPPS is the exact USAID program that ran a formal explicit global Internet censorship program, pooling 100s of censorship NGOs into one combined network, with the express stated purpose to pressure foreign governments to pass laws & regulations to censor speech online.

918,541 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

I know you have to feel vindicated, but I am keeping you in my prayers for safety

Profilbild von Second-rate Savant
Second-rate Savantvor 1 Jahr

Burn it to the ground 🔥

Profilbild von IX
IXvor 1 Jahr

The government has been working against you the entire time. DOGE cannot reduce the size of government fast enough. Restore the Bill of Rights. Shrink government.

Profilbild von Surf Panther
Surf Panthervor 1 Jahr

This is 1,000 fucking percent treason

Profilbild von Karen Waterbury
Karen Waterburyvor 1 Jahr

@DataRepublican Mike comes with receipts 😉

Profilbild von GOP Jesus
GOP Jesusvor 1 Jahr

Yikes is right.

Profilbild von MatthewJshow
MatthewJshowvor 1 Jahr

Disturbing.

Profilbild von ERICA 🤌🏼
ERICA 🤌🏼vor 1 Jahr

Benz is just a messenger, you homicidal whacko jobs. We are watching you, and he is NOT suicidal.

Profilbild von Lisa
Lisavor 1 Jahr

Wow. Never ends

Profilbild von Olymo
Olymovor 1 Jahr

Pure corruption

Ähnliche Videos

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren