正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

CEOs with a 'trans child' should be removed from decisions about Pride and trans inclusion policies, says corporate advisor Paul Sweeney. Boards must not allow 'woke' bosses to push activist agendas onto customers and employees. Link to full episode⬇️

215,202 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

Watch the full episode on YouTube

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

Join the discussion on Linkedin

Sam (he/him) 的头像
Sam (he/him)1 年前

Leave LGBTQIA+ people alone, predator.

amChallenger 的头像
amChallenger1 年前

“Each one of those people destroys entire organizations” Executives with a trans-identified child

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

Paul thinks that's unlikely to happen in private companies as shareholders will eventually sound the alarm and profit will be prioritised... but they can certainly do huge damage before they are stopped. Definitely v possible in sectors where profit isn't the main driver though!

Lee 的头像
Lee1 年前

I have seen repeatedly that it takes just 1 person on a board or in a position of influence in HR , who knows a 'trans child ', to intro duce ra trans- privileging policy for an entire organisation. No equality impact assessment, no review by Legal, no data gathering on sex.

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

Huge damage is being done to organisations- and legal risk is only one aspect. How many brilliant people have these orgs lost in the last 5 years, by shaming and silencing them? Only the nodding dogs will remain, and it's all their own fault.

Mim Cotton 的头像
Mim Cotton1 年前

CEOs with "🏳️‍⚧️ children" should have their children put in gender-uncontaminated care, charged and jailed for child abuse.

ThisIsntWorkingPodcast 的头像
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast1 年前

No sympathy for those who trusted the 'experts'?

相关视频

NyaraVT is truly obsessed with kids. He is obsessed with specifically "trans kids" in the context that he thinks kids should be groomed and given HRT and puberty blockers early, because he thinks it's "cruel" to allow trans people to go through puberty. Trans kids never exist outside of being groomed. The literature supporting it is all from delusional progressives who are biased, often projecting their own ideologies into areas that do not belong. Any who do "socially transition" as youths desist by the time they are adults, often as much as 90%+ For example, kids do not understand sex when they are 4. Anyone implying that kids are "trans" is just a creepy adult who is just projecting adult framing of sexuality to a child who is exploring the world through play. Any adult who tries to label their kids trans based on early play behavior, by 'teaching' the child sexual play, is by definition grooming and child sexual abuse. At best, this causes iatrogenic harm to the child and leads to lifelong mental and health issues even without any overt CSA. Of course, the reality is that puberty isn't optional. It is a biological and physiological need; without it, these people grow up with endless mental and physical health problems. The Cass review and many other critical studies show that puberty blockers and early HRT do not produce the "positive outcomes" these trans kids activists claim that they do. Even before modern times, historical child psychiatry and sexology are rife with data problems, scandals, controversies, and actual child sexual abuse incidents. Anyone still trusting the data of these "studies" blindly should be ignored completely. TLDR, Trans kids should not be a thing, and anyone promoting it should be treated with extreme suspicion.

Emerald Apple

95,883 次观看 • 11 天前