正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 CERN'S NEXT MACHINE IS SO POWERFUL IT COULD TEAR OPEN REALITY ITSELF - AND IT'S TERRIFYING You should not be celebrating CERN's shutdown. Because according to some researchers, theorists, and internet sleuths, the real story isn't that CERN is going offline. It's what they're building next. The Large...

HustleBitch_'s profile picture

HustleBitch

355,500 subscribers

127,252 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 A CERN SCIENTIST JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT A CERN physicist just confirmed CERN's next move... and people have questions. Dr. Clara Nellist confirmed that the Large Hadron Collider has officially been shut down. But this isn't maintenance. It's not repairs. It's an evolution. In her own words, CERN is taking the Large Hadron Collider and turning it into something new. Something stronger. She compared it to a Pokémon evolving into its next form. The most powerful scientific machine on Earth wasn't enough. Now they're building a version capable of producing vastly more collisions and vastly more data than ever before. The High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider. Why does the world's most powerful particle collider suddenly need to become dramatically more powerful CERN isn't just any laboratory. For years it's been linked to theories about alternate dimensions. Parallel realities. Timeline shifts. Reality glitches. And the Mandela Effect. Now the scientist delivering the announcement is openly telling the world that the next machine will be far more powerful than the last one. For the next four years, the collider sits in the shadows while engineers quietly prepare its next evolution. Then they flip the switch again. Only this time, it will be stronger than anything that came before it. The official explanation is that they're trying to understand the universe. The internet wants to know what they're hoping to find. If the most powerful machine on Earth wasn't enough... why does its Pokemon evolution need to be even stronger?
2:54

🚨 A CERN SCIENTIST JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT A CERN physicist just confirmed CERN's next move... and people have questions. Dr. Clara Nellist confirmed that the Large Hadron Collider has officially been shut down. But this isn't maintenance. It's not repairs. It's an evolution. In her own words, CERN is taking the Large Hadron Collider and turning it into something new. Something stronger. She compared it to a Pokémon evolving into its next form. The most powerful scientific machine on Earth wasn't enough. Now they're building a version capable of producing vastly more collisions and vastly more data than ever before. The High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider. Why does the world's most powerful particle collider suddenly need to become dramatically more powerful CERN isn't just any laboratory. For years it's been linked to theories about alternate dimensions. Parallel realities. Timeline shifts. Reality glitches. And the Mandela Effect. Now the scientist delivering the announcement is openly telling the world that the next machine will be far more powerful than the last one. For the next four years, the collider sits in the shadows while engineers quietly prepare its next evolution. Then they flip the switch again. Only this time, it will be stronger than anything that came before it. The official explanation is that they're trying to understand the universe. The internet wants to know what they're hoping to find. If the most powerful machine on Earth wasn't enough... why does its Pokemon evolution need to be even stronger?

HustleBitch

184,227 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CERN OFFICIALLY WENT DARK — AND NOW PEOPLE ARE QUESTIONING REALITY CERN has officially shut down the Large Hadron Collider until 2030. And one of the internet's strangest theories is suddenly back. The Mandela Effect. The bizarre phenomenon where millions of people remember things differently than they're supposedly recorded. Pikachu's black-tipped tail. The Fruit of the Loom cornucopia. Mirror, Mirror on the wall. Most people say it's faulty memory. Others believe it's something else. What if those memories aren't wrong? What if reality changed? Years ago, a viral theory claimed CERN's particle collider experiments may have somehow shifted humanity into a neighboring timeline where small details are different. Sounds insane. But millions of people still debate the Mandela Effect to this day. Now CERN is offline and preparing an upgraded collider that scientists say will be far more powerful than before. And that's why the theory is back. Because if people already believe reality changed once... what do they think happens when the machine comes back online even stronger? Do you think the Mandela Effect is just bad memory... or evidence that something happened to reality itself?
4:52

🚨 CERN OFFICIALLY WENT DARK — AND NOW PEOPLE ARE QUESTIONING REALITY CERN has officially shut down the Large Hadron Collider until 2030. And one of the internet's strangest theories is suddenly back. The Mandela Effect. The bizarre phenomenon where millions of people remember things differently than they're supposedly recorded. Pikachu's black-tipped tail. The Fruit of the Loom cornucopia. Mirror, Mirror on the wall. Most people say it's faulty memory. Others believe it's something else. What if those memories aren't wrong? What if reality changed? Years ago, a viral theory claimed CERN's particle collider experiments may have somehow shifted humanity into a neighboring timeline where small details are different. Sounds insane. But millions of people still debate the Mandela Effect to this day. Now CERN is offline and preparing an upgraded collider that scientists say will be far more powerful than before. And that's why the theory is back. Because if people already believe reality changed once... what do they think happens when the machine comes back online even stronger? Do you think the Mandela Effect is just bad memory... or evidence that something happened to reality itself?

HustleBitch

598,058 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CERN SHUT DOWN — AND PEOPLE ARE NOTICING STRANGE THINGS HAPPENING The Large Hadron Collider is offline. And according to a growing number of posts online, people are noticing something unusual. They're sleeping better. Feeling more rested. Waking up with more energy. Some even claim the days feel longer. For years, theories have circulated that CERN's experiments were doing more than studying particle physics. Time distortion. Reality shifts. Changes to human consciousness. Most people dismissed those ideas. But now that the collider has been shut down for "upgrades", the theories are coming back stronger than ever. Across social media, people are reporting the same strange experiences. Deeper sleep. More vivid dreams. Less brain fog. And a feeling that something is different. Scientists say the shutdown is simply part of a planned upgrade before an even more powerful machine comes online in the future. But for many people, the timing feels too perfect to ignore. Because the strangest part isn't that CERN shut down. It's how many people suddenly claim they felt a change when it did. Coincidence... or was CERN affecting something far bigger than we were told?
1:52

🚨 CERN SHUT DOWN — AND PEOPLE ARE NOTICING STRANGE THINGS HAPPENING The Large Hadron Collider is offline. And according to a growing number of posts online, people are noticing something unusual. They're sleeping better. Feeling more rested. Waking up with more energy. Some even claim the days feel longer. For years, theories have circulated that CERN's experiments were doing more than studying particle physics. Time distortion. Reality shifts. Changes to human consciousness. Most people dismissed those ideas. But now that the collider has been shut down for "upgrades", the theories are coming back stronger than ever. Across social media, people are reporting the same strange experiences. Deeper sleep. More vivid dreams. Less brain fog. And a feeling that something is different. Scientists say the shutdown is simply part of a planned upgrade before an even more powerful machine comes online in the future. But for many people, the timing feels too perfect to ignore. Because the strangest part isn't that CERN shut down. It's how many people suddenly claim they felt a change when it did. Coincidence... or was CERN affecting something far bigger than we were told?

HustleBitch

24,500 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CERN IS SHUTTING DOWN NEXT WEEK — AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO PANIC On June 29, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is scheduled to shut down until 2030. And people are starting to notice a pattern. CERN first fired up in 2008. Within days, Wall Street collapsed and the world was thrown into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Then CERN entered its first major shutdown in 2013. Within 24 hours, a massive meteor exploded over Russia in one of the most powerful impacts in modern history. Then CERN entered its second long shutdown from 2018 to 2022. And what happened during that window? A global pandemic. Worldwide lockdowns. Supply chain chaos. Economic meltdown. Political unrest. And a world that never went back to normal. Now CERN is shutting down again. This time until 2030. As AI explodes. As wars escalate. As governments push digital IDs. As America approaches its 250th birthday. And as CERN prepares an even bigger collider for the future. Maybe it’s all coincidence. But how many coincidences before it becomes a pattern? What do you think happens over the next four years while CERN is offline?
1:31

🚨 CERN IS SHUTTING DOWN NEXT WEEK — AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO PANIC On June 29, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is scheduled to shut down until 2030. And people are starting to notice a pattern. CERN first fired up in 2008. Within days, Wall Street collapsed and the world was thrown into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Then CERN entered its first major shutdown in 2013. Within 24 hours, a massive meteor exploded over Russia in one of the most powerful impacts in modern history. Then CERN entered its second long shutdown from 2018 to 2022. And what happened during that window? A global pandemic. Worldwide lockdowns. Supply chain chaos. Economic meltdown. Political unrest. And a world that never went back to normal. Now CERN is shutting down again. This time until 2030. As AI explodes. As wars escalate. As governments push digital IDs. As America approaches its 250th birthday. And as CERN prepares an even bigger collider for the future. Maybe it’s all coincidence. But how many coincidences before it becomes a pattern? What do you think happens over the next four years while CERN is offline?

HustleBitch

677,047 次观看 • 2 个月前

Travis Kalanick: The UK's Social Media Ban is About Censoring and Tracking Adults, Not Protecting Kids travis kalanick: “I think we all agree social media is bad for the kids and for the adults. Too much of that stuff is very bad. It's brain rot for real, and it's going to be worse than cigarettes. It's all the things. But the real point of banning under 16 is so that you can force adults to identify themselves and de-anonymize themselves, so you can set up a full-scale censorship regime, which they're sort of contemplating in the UK. And what censorship is really about is not harmful content, it's about content that the people in power don't want you to see that disagrees with them. If it agreed with them, it's not harmful. It's the stuff that doesn't agree with them. And so what they're doing is they're criminalizing disagreeing with them. And so there's a derivative of this age-based stuff, which is really about the adults, not the kids.”
0:54

Travis Kalanick: The UK's Social Media Ban is About Censoring and Tracking Adults, Not Protecting Kids travis kalanick: “I think we all agree social media is bad for the kids and for the adults. Too much of that stuff is very bad. It's brain rot for real, and it's going to be worse than cigarettes. It's all the things. But the real point of banning under 16 is so that you can force adults to identify themselves and de-anonymize themselves, so you can set up a full-scale censorship regime, which they're sort of contemplating in the UK. And what censorship is really about is not harmful content, it's about content that the people in power don't want you to see that disagrees with them. If it agreed with them, it's not harmful. It's the stuff that doesn't agree with them. And so what they're doing is they're criminalizing disagreeing with them. And so there's a derivative of this age-based stuff, which is really about the adults, not the kids.”

The All-In Podcast

85,015 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELON'S POV ON THE MEANING OF LIFE: "IT'S ABOUT THE QUESTION, NOT THE ANSWER" Elon is literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building, from Neuralink and Starship to Grok and Optimus, is aimed at one goal. What's the goal, you ask? To turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. "Humans are 30~40 trillion cells, trillions of synapses… but the why of it is just so we can increase our understanding of the universe. I came to the conclusion, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy style, that the answer is 42, but the real problem is we don't even know what the question is. The hard part is the question, not the answer. And for that you need a much bigger computer than Earth. So by expanding the scope and scale of consciousness, we can better understand what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe." He's literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building (Neuralink, Starship, Grok, Optimus), is to turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. Not to get the answer. To learn how to ask the question that makes the answer meaningful. This is why he doesn't give a damn about money, politics, or fame anymore. He's playing the longest game in history: Turning consciousness into a galaxy-scale instrument so we can finally understand why anything exists at all. Source: Nikhil Kamath, Elon Musk
2:44

ELON'S POV ON THE MEANING OF LIFE: "IT'S ABOUT THE QUESTION, NOT THE ANSWER" Elon is literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building, from Neuralink and Starship to Grok and Optimus, is aimed at one goal. What's the goal, you ask? To turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. "Humans are 30~40 trillion cells, trillions of synapses… but the why of it is just so we can increase our understanding of the universe. I came to the conclusion, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy style, that the answer is 42, but the real problem is we don't even know what the question is. The hard part is the question, not the answer. And for that you need a much bigger computer than Earth. So by expanding the scope and scale of consciousness, we can better understand what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe." He's literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building (Neuralink, Starship, Grok, Optimus), is to turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. Not to get the answer. To learn how to ask the question that makes the answer meaningful. This is why he doesn't give a damn about money, politics, or fame anymore. He's playing the longest game in history: Turning consciousness into a galaxy-scale instrument so we can finally understand why anything exists at all. Source: Nikhil Kamath, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

825,676 次观看 • 8 个月前

Behn: This isn't the end of our story. It's not even close, because what we have built here in this district, this grassroots movement, is part of something bigger that is happening across the south and is happening across this country. Because we are tired of people outside of this state telling us that the south is backwards, that it's hopeless and it's destined to be ruled by the same powerful people again and again. The south is not silent because the south has something to say. And Tennessee, we are leading the way. We have inspired an entire country. They are with us tonight and they are so proud. we’re able to do. And we may not have won tonight, but we changed the story of what's possible here. And we're not done, not by a long shot.
1:16

Behn: This isn't the end of our story. It's not even close, because what we have built here in this district, this grassroots movement, is part of something bigger that is happening across the south and is happening across this country. Because we are tired of people outside of this state telling us that the south is backwards, that it's hopeless and it's destined to be ruled by the same powerful people again and again. The south is not silent because the south has something to say. And Tennessee, we are leading the way. We have inspired an entire country. They are with us tonight and they are so proud. we’re able to do. And we may not have won tonight, but we changed the story of what's possible here. And we're not done, not by a long shot.

Acyn

99,437 次观看 • 8 个月前

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.
0:50

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.

Big Brain Philosophy

17,476 次观看 • 4 个月前

CERN and The Occult When they show you who they are... Believe them. Announced on July 4, 2012, by ATLAS and CMS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the Higgs boson particle was found. The Higgs boson is a wave in the Higgs field, a scalar field that exists throughout space. But what if there was more to this story than just smashing particles together for research? What if doorways were being opened to other dimensions, and what if something came through it? CERN itself comes from "Cernunnos," the Celtic horned god," the lord of the wild, associated with fertility, life, death and the underworld. This is their literal "cult," and being in which they pay homage to. CERN was also built on an ancient temple site to Apollo, the Greek god of prophecy, truth, and light, which is very common in elite occult circles, even with NASA. These are their gods in which they worship and pay homage to. There is so much more to this story and their occult ritualistic ceremonies and bizarre stories of entities coming through these doorways should tell you exactly what they are doing and trying to achieve. Until you understand that this pattern of worshipping false idols and messing with spiritual ritualistic practices and now moving into real experiments trying to communicate and contact things from other realms is what elites in high places that control many things throughout our world are doing and what they are about, you will never truly understand the bigger picture.
27:17

CERN and The Occult When they show you who they are... Believe them. Announced on July 4, 2012, by ATLAS and CMS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the Higgs boson particle was found. The Higgs boson is a wave in the Higgs field, a scalar field that exists throughout space. But what if there was more to this story than just smashing particles together for research? What if doorways were being opened to other dimensions, and what if something came through it? CERN itself comes from "Cernunnos," the Celtic horned god," the lord of the wild, associated with fertility, life, death and the underworld. This is their literal "cult," and being in which they pay homage to. CERN was also built on an ancient temple site to Apollo, the Greek god of prophecy, truth, and light, which is very common in elite occult circles, even with NASA. These are their gods in which they worship and pay homage to. There is so much more to this story and their occult ritualistic ceremonies and bizarre stories of entities coming through these doorways should tell you exactly what they are doing and trying to achieve. Until you understand that this pattern of worshipping false idols and messing with spiritual ritualistic practices and now moving into real experiments trying to communicate and contact things from other realms is what elites in high places that control many things throughout our world are doing and what they are about, you will never truly understand the bigger picture.

The SCIF

120,537 次观看 • 5 个月前

Terrence McKenna in an interview in 1998: "I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder and weirder, and finally, it's going to be so weird that people will have to talk about how weird it is. [...] This is what it's like when a species prepares to depart for the stars. You don't depart for the stars under calm and orderly conditions. It's a fire in a madhouse, and that's what we have - the fire in the madhouse at the end of time. This is what it's like when a species prepares to move on to the next dimension."
4:39

Terrence McKenna in an interview in 1998: "I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder and weirder, and finally, it's going to be so weird that people will have to talk about how weird it is. [...] This is what it's like when a species prepares to depart for the stars. You don't depart for the stars under calm and orderly conditions. It's a fire in a madhouse, and that's what we have - the fire in the madhouse at the end of time. This is what it's like when a species prepares to move on to the next dimension."

𓆝𓆜𓆞𓆢

26,389 次观看 • 1 年前

Exploring big questions about the universe is crucial for developing critical thinking and rationality. The Importance of Big Questions - Zafar Mirzo Zafar Mirzo Quote 1. Raising all sorts of interesting and big questions about the boundaries and mysteries of the universe and contemplating them is very important, for only such reflections guarantee the development of the ability to think critically, logically, and rationally. Quote 2. The ultimate questions about our world: Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose? Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared? Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence? Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical? What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite? Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause? What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future? Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not? Quote 3. The more rational and active spirituality is, the more authentic and fruitful it is. Quote 4. For spirituality to be capable of maximum productivity, it must have a comprehensive rational basis. Quote 5. Before denying scientific knowledge about the origin of the human being, first investigate how these facts were collected and study them to understand what they convey.
1:49

Exploring big questions about the universe is crucial for developing critical thinking and rationality. The Importance of Big Questions - Zafar Mirzo Zafar Mirzo Quote 1. Raising all sorts of interesting and big questions about the boundaries and mysteries of the universe and contemplating them is very important, for only such reflections guarantee the development of the ability to think critically, logically, and rationally. Quote 2. The ultimate questions about our world: Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose? Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared? Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence? Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical? What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite? Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause? What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future? Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not? Quote 3. The more rational and active spirituality is, the more authentic and fruitful it is. Quote 4. For spirituality to be capable of maximum productivity, it must have a comprehensive rational basis. Quote 5. Before denying scientific knowledge about the origin of the human being, first investigate how these facts were collected and study them to understand what they convey.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

4,751,731 次观看 • 2 年前

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.
2:17

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.

Presidency | Rwanda

68,782 次观看 • 1 年前

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲
1:36

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,294 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."
2:04

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

TBPN

21,055 次观看 • 7 个月前

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.
1:38

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.

Acyn

82,210 次观看 • 1 个月前

Inferact CEO Simon Mo says open and closed models are converging. The moat is environment: "What really differentiates open-weight models from closed-weight models? In the end, there's not much differentiation. It's more about the distribution strategy and go-to-market strategy. Capability-wise, I don't really see a big gap, not even today." "One of the most important parts is just the data. It's about who gets what data, and then what are the environments you are building to let the model improve on itself." "For Moonshot, they have built some of the best environments for front-end coding... the ability for this model to code and then see what the rendered code is, and then continue looping in this iterative process." "Now, this is about their environment to improve the model. It's not about just source data. It's not about where they get the data from. Rather, it's who can build the best environment and who can make the most optimization and algorithmic choices to leverage all this learning from this environment." "The next year is all gonna be about that: how open-weight model labs are differentiating and really getting the model to meet the real world." Simon Mo
2:06

Inferact CEO Simon Mo says open and closed models are converging. The moat is environment: "What really differentiates open-weight models from closed-weight models? In the end, there's not much differentiation. It's more about the distribution strategy and go-to-market strategy. Capability-wise, I don't really see a big gap, not even today." "One of the most important parts is just the data. It's about who gets what data, and then what are the environments you are building to let the model improve on itself." "For Moonshot, they have built some of the best environments for front-end coding... the ability for this model to code and then see what the rendered code is, and then continue looping in this iterative process." "Now, this is about their environment to improve the model. It's not about just source data. It's not about where they get the data from. Rather, it's who can build the best environment and who can make the most optimization and algorithmic choices to leverage all this learning from this environment." "The next year is all gonna be about that: how open-weight model labs are differentiating and really getting the model to meet the real world." Simon Mo

a16z

39,424 次观看 • 13 天前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 8 个月前

I very much disagree with some of Jon Jones' recent statements. It's not about you, Jon. It's not about your life, it's not about your story. If you want to be a part of a reality show and take that money to delay things and hold someone else's dreams back from becoming a reality. That is ducking. That is ducking because there is a time-honored tradition in the sport. The whole thing has to move along. Get rid of that belt. Everyone thinks you've done enough. You've earned enough. You've proven enough. Now allow someone else to have that same story. You are holding back not only Tom Aspinall, but the rest of the division. So yes, you're missing the point. This isn't about you. It's about the belt.
4:44

I very much disagree with some of Jon Jones' recent statements. It's not about you, Jon. It's not about your life, it's not about your story. If you want to be a part of a reality show and take that money to delay things and hold someone else's dreams back from becoming a reality. That is ducking. That is ducking because there is a time-honored tradition in the sport. The whole thing has to move along. Get rid of that belt. Everyone thinks you've done enough. You've earned enough. You've proven enough. Now allow someone else to have that same story. You are holding back not only Tom Aspinall, but the rest of the division. So yes, you're missing the point. This isn't about you. It's about the belt.

Ariel Helwani

411,245 次观看 • 1 年前