Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Chamath on why the AI capex spend might end up in a bubble Even though the race is on to adopt this technology as fast as possible, key economic indicators such as productivity and GDP growth are not yet showing any meaningful changes because of AI For the spend...

BoringBiz_'s profile picture

Boring_Business

206,111 subscribers

144,208 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Marc Andreessen on the imperative of speed in AI adoption: "Both the AI utopians and the AI doomers are far too optimistic." "They believe that because the technology makes something possible, 8 billion people all of a sudden are going to change how they behave. It's like—no. So much of how the existing economy works is just wired in." "We're going to be lucky as a society if AI adoption happens quickly. Because if it doesn't, what we're going to have is stagnation." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space
0:24

Marc Andreessen on the imperative of speed in AI adoption: "Both the AI utopians and the AI doomers are far too optimistic." "They believe that because the technology makes something possible, 8 billion people all of a sudden are going to change how they behave. It's like—no. So much of how the existing economy works is just wired in." "We're going to be lucky as a society if AI adoption happens quickly. Because if it doesn't, what we're going to have is stagnation." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space

a16z

70,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Gavin Baker just posed the trillion dollar question, who's actually going to pay for all this AI spending? Baker frames the whole AI capex debate around one question, since even if hyperscalers are under earning today and compute pricing normalizes, someone has to pay for that recovered cash flow and that money comes from only two places, faster economic growth or labor substitution. The scale of the number itself is what makes the debate matter. There's roughly $25 trillion in global knowledge work spending and even a conservative 20% token spend ratio against that total comp base implies $5 trillion in potential AI spend, an amount that has to be funded by either productivity gains or replaced headcount. Real company data shows token spend already climbing toward that range. Ramp's own economist reported AI adoption crossing 50% of US businesses by March 2026, up from 35% a year earlier, and average monthly AI token spend across Ramp's customer base has grown 13 times since January 2025. Among the most aggressive adopters, that spend is becoming a serious share of total labor cost rather than a rounding error. SemiAnalysis reportedly runs AI token spend at 30% of total compensation spend and some companies have pushed that ratio as high as 50%, putting them well ahead of the 20-25% range typical even among heavily AI-pilled firms. The labor substitution side of Gavin Baker framework is already visible in company financials. Gross profit dollars per full-time employee at AI native companies tracked by a16z and Carta are running meaningfully higher than prior startup generations, showing these companies are staying lean rather than scaling headcount alongside revenue. Founder led companies are sending a different signal than the substitution story alone would suggest. Rather than replacing existing staff, most founder controlled companies aren't running large-scale layoffs even as they adopt AI heavily, which points toward AI spend layering on top of existing headcount to chase new growth rather than simply cutting costs. That distinction matters because it's exactly the bull case Baker is describing. Ramp's Spring 2026 report found companies investing the most in AI more than doubled their revenue since ChatGPT launched, while companies with zero AI spend grew only 15% and Ramp separately found heavy AI spenders growing revenue roughly twice as fast as low spend peers. Put together, the evidence leans toward growth rather than pure substitution funding this spend.
3:00

Gavin Baker just posed the trillion dollar question, who's actually going to pay for all this AI spending? Baker frames the whole AI capex debate around one question, since even if hyperscalers are under earning today and compute pricing normalizes, someone has to pay for that recovered cash flow and that money comes from only two places, faster economic growth or labor substitution. The scale of the number itself is what makes the debate matter. There's roughly $25 trillion in global knowledge work spending and even a conservative 20% token spend ratio against that total comp base implies $5 trillion in potential AI spend, an amount that has to be funded by either productivity gains or replaced headcount. Real company data shows token spend already climbing toward that range. Ramp's own economist reported AI adoption crossing 50% of US businesses by March 2026, up from 35% a year earlier, and average monthly AI token spend across Ramp's customer base has grown 13 times since January 2025. Among the most aggressive adopters, that spend is becoming a serious share of total labor cost rather than a rounding error. SemiAnalysis reportedly runs AI token spend at 30% of total compensation spend and some companies have pushed that ratio as high as 50%, putting them well ahead of the 20-25% range typical even among heavily AI-pilled firms. The labor substitution side of Gavin Baker framework is already visible in company financials. Gross profit dollars per full-time employee at AI native companies tracked by a16z and Carta are running meaningfully higher than prior startup generations, showing these companies are staying lean rather than scaling headcount alongside revenue. Founder led companies are sending a different signal than the substitution story alone would suggest. Rather than replacing existing staff, most founder controlled companies aren't running large-scale layoffs even as they adopt AI heavily, which points toward AI spend layering on top of existing headcount to chase new growth rather than simply cutting costs. That distinction matters because it's exactly the bull case Baker is describing. Ramp's Spring 2026 report found companies investing the most in AI more than doubled their revenue since ChatGPT launched, while companies with zero AI spend grew only 15% and Ramp separately found heavy AI spenders growing revenue roughly twice as fast as low spend peers. Put together, the evidence leans toward growth rather than pure substitution funding this spend.

Milk Road AI

30,966 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

“We have an AI bubble.” Edward Dowd just revealed an uncomfortable truth about AI data center spending. GDP growth for Q4 2025 came in at 0.7%. But … “If you back out the data center AI GDP number, about 1.5%, which doesn’t really add to the labor force, we were negative GDP.” AI capital expenditure has been “driving a lot of the GDP, and especially Nvidia.” But Dowd warns that that’s about to change. “AI CapEx is gonna be rolling over very soon.” “We just made the power complex that much more expensive.” “We don’t have enough electricity and water to fund all this CapEx for AI.” “It’s already starting to show signs of cracking because the debt markets are questioning the ROI on the whole complex.” “There’s not enough revenue to support this CapEx spend.” Edward Dowd Jeffrey A Tucker
1:46

“We have an AI bubble.” Edward Dowd just revealed an uncomfortable truth about AI data center spending. GDP growth for Q4 2025 came in at 0.7%. But … “If you back out the data center AI GDP number, about 1.5%, which doesn’t really add to the labor force, we were negative GDP.” AI capital expenditure has been “driving a lot of the GDP, and especially Nvidia.” But Dowd warns that that’s about to change. “AI CapEx is gonna be rolling over very soon.” “We just made the power complex that much more expensive.” “We don’t have enough electricity and water to fund all this CapEx for AI.” “It’s already starting to show signs of cracking because the debt markets are questioning the ROI on the whole complex.” “There’s not enough revenue to support this CapEx spend.” Edward Dowd Jeffrey A Tucker

Brownstone Institute

23,331 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

We need to support the responsible growth of AI. With the Grass L2, AI developers will be able to verify the origin of all training data, preventing data poisoning and fighting AI misinformation. This technology has never been more important.
1:36

We need to support the responsible growth of AI. With the Grass L2, AI developers will be able to verify the origin of all training data, preventing data poisoning and fighting AI misinformation. This technology has never been more important.

Grass

343,615 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

👀 Full clip of Jensen Huang on energy policy and AI is even more direct: “The fact that Trump came into office and the first thing he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’…it saved the AI industry. I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories. We surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories. None of that stuff would be possible. Without all of that, construction jobs would be challenged…electrician jobs would be challenged. So I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to reindustrialize the United States. We need to be back in manufacturing.“
1:00

👀 Full clip of Jensen Huang on energy policy and AI is even more direct: “The fact that Trump came into office and the first thing he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’…it saved the AI industry. I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories. We surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories. None of that stuff would be possible. Without all of that, construction jobs would be challenged…electrician jobs would be challenged. So I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to reindustrialize the United States. We need to be back in manufacturing.“

Dan Byers

37,753 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

David Sacks Shares a New Study Which Counters the AI Doomer Narrative “They find that both job growth and wage growth is higher, not lower, in the occupations that are exposed to AI … As you make workers more productive, the value of their labor increases, not decreases, and they end up getting paid more and you want to hire more of them. So this is a huge narrative violation.”
1:49

David Sacks Shares a New Study Which Counters the AI Doomer Narrative “They find that both job growth and wage growth is higher, not lower, in the occupations that are exposed to AI … As you make workers more productive, the value of their labor increases, not decreases, and they end up getting paid more and you want to hire more of them. So this is a huge narrative violation.”

Chief Nerd

68,943 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”
1:42

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

The All-In Podcast

152,399 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”
1:01

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”

The All-In Podcast

2,074,815 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

AOC: Trump has been saying the economy is booming, but it’s really only seven tech companies. They’re driving this growth in just one sector: AI. So the entire economic growth can be tracked down to seven companies and their AI expansion. Forty percent of economic growth is attributed to these companies alone, and 80% of stock gains this year came from AI companies. People are justifying these levels of investment because of the promises CEOs make — that there will be a return on that investment. For a company like OpenAI, their valuation is based on the expectation that they’re going to figure out how to make a profit off this, and they haven’t. Generating this increased human dependency that can be mined — people’s deepest fears, emotional content — can all be mined for this empty promise that we’re getting from these companies in the pursuit of profit. The reason I bring all of this up is that the exposure to this industry and this investment, I fear, has reached broad levels of the American economy. We’re talking about 40% of growth being attributed to that sector alone, and it has not turned a profit. We’re talking about a massive economic bubble. Depending on the exposure of that bubble, we could be facing 2008-style threats to economic stability.
3:29

AOC: Trump has been saying the economy is booming, but it’s really only seven tech companies. They’re driving this growth in just one sector: AI. So the entire economic growth can be tracked down to seven companies and their AI expansion. Forty percent of economic growth is attributed to these companies alone, and 80% of stock gains this year came from AI companies. People are justifying these levels of investment because of the promises CEOs make — that there will be a return on that investment. For a company like OpenAI, their valuation is based on the expectation that they’re going to figure out how to make a profit off this, and they haven’t. Generating this increased human dependency that can be mined — people’s deepest fears, emotional content — can all be mined for this empty promise that we’re getting from these companies in the pursuit of profit. The reason I bring all of this up is that the exposure to this industry and this investment, I fear, has reached broad levels of the American economy. We’re talking about 40% of growth being attributed to that sector alone, and it has not turned a profit. We’re talking about a massive economic bubble. Depending on the exposure of that bubble, we could be facing 2008-style threats to economic stability.

Acyn

1,057,844 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not static. It is a rapidly progressing, real-time and dynamic. Therefore, all of us will have to be conscious that we don't sit back on the ethics. We need to be clear that regulation has to run the race equally as much as the technology is running it. If the technology is on a sprint, the regulation has to be on the sprint, too. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman at the launch of 'AI for Viksit Bharat: The Opportunity for Accelerated Economic Growth' and the Frontier Tech Repository by NITI Aayog in New Delhi.
1:13

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not static. It is a rapidly progressing, real-time and dynamic. Therefore, all of us will have to be conscious that we don't sit back on the ethics. We need to be clear that regulation has to run the race equally as much as the technology is running it. If the technology is on a sprint, the regulation has to be on the sprint, too. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman at the launch of 'AI for Viksit Bharat: The Opportunity for Accelerated Economic Growth' and the Frontier Tech Repository by NITI Aayog in New Delhi.

Nirmala Sitharaman Office

47,357 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

We need AI to work. Marc Andreessen on why AI is arriving at a moment of economic and demographic pressure: "Productivity growth for the last 50 years has actually been very low, not very high." "So statistically, in the US, in the west, technology progress in the economy ... has actually slowed way down." "Many countries around the world ... are actually going to depopulate over the next century." "We actually need AI to work in order to get productivity growth up... We actually need AI to work because we’re going to need machines to do all the jobs that we’re not going to have people to do." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky
2:13

We need AI to work. Marc Andreessen on why AI is arriving at a moment of economic and demographic pressure: "Productivity growth for the last 50 years has actually been very low, not very high." "So statistically, in the US, in the west, technology progress in the economy ... has actually slowed way down." "Many countries around the world ... are actually going to depopulate over the next century." "We actually need AI to work in order to get productivity growth up... We actually need AI to work because we’re going to need machines to do all the jobs that we’re not going to have people to do." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

31,348 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"SaaS was Software as a Service. I believe it's going to be service as software." General Catalyst's Madhu Namburi on the AI roll-up thesis. Services is a $20 trillion market.... multiple times the size of software. not the PE playbook of debt and cost-cutting. Venture is buying legacy companies and using AI to drive growth
0:45

"SaaS was Software as a Service. I believe it's going to be service as software." General Catalyst's Madhu Namburi on the AI roll-up thesis. Services is a $20 trillion market.... multiple times the size of software. not the PE playbook of debt and cost-cutting. Venture is buying legacy companies and using AI to drive growth

Deirdre Bosa

86,713 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

One of the biggest lies of the AI bubble is that Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta are "growing because of AI." In reality, they're using the continued growth of their other business units to cover the meager returns from AI, and the massive waste of their trillion+ in capex.
0:31

One of the biggest lies of the AI bubble is that Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta are "growing because of AI." In reality, they're using the continued growth of their other business units to cover the meager returns from AI, and the massive waste of their trillion+ in capex.

Ed Zitron

539,508 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk in a new SpaceX employee meeting on why it’s important for Grok to succeed: "We gotta win here on the AI hardware and AI software. That is the most important message I wanted to convey today; is that we must win on AI, because the future is overwhelmingly AI and Robots. We won’t ultimately be able to control the AI, it’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. So that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok." Very strong message.
0:48

Elon Musk in a new SpaceX employee meeting on why it’s important for Grok to succeed: "We gotta win here on the AI hardware and AI software. That is the most important message I wanted to convey today; is that we must win on AI, because the future is overwhelmingly AI and Robots. We won’t ultimately be able to control the AI, it’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. So that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok." Very strong message.

Nic Cruz Patane

156,187 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

this video is 100% AI Generated.. many of the top AI UGC platforms are actively using my content in their marketing materials without my permission lol i still haven't seen any AI UGC platform replicate my quality or costs.. ill soon be releasing my own specialized MCP that lets you automate high quality AI UGC. we've perfected this internally & this is not a system any other platform has access to or will be able to replicate even closely at my price + realism.. my tool is a year ahead of what's currently possible in AI UGC. & no it's not just an API wrapper, it's far more than that. it doesn't even use any of the traditional model APIs that every other platform is built on. and due to the nature of how the videos are made, they almost never get AI watermarked or throttled on Meta. i'll be releasing this MCP to the public soon. you'll be able to create realistic AI UGC for far less than what these major platforms charge with much better results. here's an example video it made. you'll be shocked at the price per video..
0:33

this video is 100% AI Generated.. many of the top AI UGC platforms are actively using my content in their marketing materials without my permission lol i still haven't seen any AI UGC platform replicate my quality or costs.. ill soon be releasing my own specialized MCP that lets you automate high quality AI UGC. we've perfected this internally & this is not a system any other platform has access to or will be able to replicate even closely at my price + realism.. my tool is a year ahead of what's currently possible in AI UGC. & no it's not just an API wrapper, it's far more than that. it doesn't even use any of the traditional model APIs that every other platform is built on. and due to the nature of how the videos are made, they almost never get AI watermarked or throttled on Meta. i'll be releasing this MCP to the public soon. you'll be able to create realistic AI UGC for far less than what these major platforms charge with much better results. here's an example video it made. you'll be shocked at the price per video..

Miko

12,188 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

CHRIS CAMILLO SAYS ONE OF THE EASIEST WAY TO GET RICH RIGHT NOW IS BECOMING THE "AI GUY" FOR PEOPLE WHO REFUSE TO LEARN AI "There's a pretty big arbitrage window there for anyone who's willing to simply learn AI and be helpful to someone that is either unwilling to learn AI or just too slow to adopt." - Chris Camillo "There are tens of millions of companies, small, medium, big, and most of them are not even touching AI yet." He points to institutional private equity now planning to spend tens of billions of dollars just helping enterprises onboard AI, because most companies haven't touched it yet. His comparison: it took companies two decades to fully embrace social media, and over a decade to adopt search advertising at scale. "I think that arbitrage window is gonna last a while. Not months. Years." We haven't even started yet.
2:52

CHRIS CAMILLO SAYS ONE OF THE EASIEST WAY TO GET RICH RIGHT NOW IS BECOMING THE "AI GUY" FOR PEOPLE WHO REFUSE TO LEARN AI "There's a pretty big arbitrage window there for anyone who's willing to simply learn AI and be helpful to someone that is either unwilling to learn AI or just too slow to adopt." - Chris Camillo "There are tens of millions of companies, small, medium, big, and most of them are not even touching AI yet." He points to institutional private equity now planning to spend tens of billions of dollars just helping enterprises onboard AI, because most companies haven't touched it yet. His comparison: it took companies two decades to fully embrace social media, and over a decade to adopt search advertising at scale. "I think that arbitrage window is gonna last a while. Not months. Years." We haven't even started yet.

WOLF

34,044 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:34

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

There needs to be some kind of regulations on representing your food with AI flyers, it’s becoming a major problem already If you walk around the Orange County Fair, TONS of food flyers are all fake AI generated images. Even the OC fair merchandise, like sweaters are AI generated Unfortunately right now there is no general ban on using AI-generated images for food flyers, menus or merchandise Food is one thing that at the very least should have to be labeled as ai generated. This is very deceptive
2:26

There needs to be some kind of regulations on representing your food with AI flyers, it’s becoming a major problem already If you walk around the Orange County Fair, TONS of food flyers are all fake AI generated images. Even the OC fair merchandise, like sweaters are AI generated Unfortunately right now there is no general ban on using AI-generated images for food flyers, menus or merchandise Food is one thing that at the very least should have to be labeled as ai generated. This is very deceptive

Wall Street Apes

43,887 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen