正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

David Sacks Shares a New Study Which Counters the AI Doomer Narrative “They find that both job growth and wage growth is higher, not lower, in the occupations that are exposed to AI … As you make workers more productive, the value of their labor increases, not decreases, and... show more

Chief Nerd

909,796 subscribers

68,943 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will *create* more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be *faster* than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will create more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be faster than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

316,935 次观看 • 1 年前

Brilliant articulation of America’s new pro growth, regulatory skeptical AI framework by JD Vance. More open. More ambitious. Less scared. “AI will make us more productive, more prosperous and more free.” We are lucky to have JD leading the charge! 🫡🇺🇸🚀David Sacks

Brilliant articulation of America’s new pro growth, regulatory skeptical AI framework by JD Vance. More open. More ambitious. Less scared. “AI will make us more productive, more prosperous and more free.” We are lucky to have JD leading the charge! 🫡🇺🇸🚀David Sacks

Brad Gerstner

233,355 次观看 • 1 年前

Kevin Hassett: "I think there could be a little bit of an almost quiet time in the labor market, because firms are finding that AI is making their workers so productive that they don't necessarily have to hire the new kids out of college and so on."

Kevin Hassett: "I think there could be a little bit of an almost quiet time in the labor market, because firms are finding that AI is making their workers so productive that they don't necessarily have to hire the new kids out of college and so on."

Aaron Rupar

1,150,048 次观看 • 7 个月前

Chamath on why the AI capex spend might end up in a bubble Even though the race is on to adopt this technology as fast as possible, key economic indicators such as productivity and GDP growth are not yet showing any meaningful changes because of AI For the spend on AI to continue, companies need to be able to point to margin expansion or revenue growth that was directly contributed through AI A shoe company must be able to say they sold more shoes because of AI adoption A food or restaurant business must be able to say that they generated higher profits because of AI adoption This is simply not the case today. Until that happens, the AI thesis remains fickle

Chamath on why the AI capex spend might end up in a bubble Even though the race is on to adopt this technology as fast as possible, key economic indicators such as productivity and GDP growth are not yet showing any meaningful changes because of AI For the spend on AI to continue, companies need to be able to point to margin expansion or revenue growth that was directly contributed through AI A shoe company must be able to say they sold more shoes because of AI adoption A food or restaurant business must be able to say that they generated higher profits because of AI adoption This is simply not the case today. Until that happens, the AI thesis remains fickle

Boring_Business

144,050 次观看 • 1 个月前

DAVID SACKS: “I understand that there is a lot of concern about [AI] job disruption or job loss. That's not what we're seeing in the data so far. What we're actually seeing is job creation … We have a 4% GDP growth number right now, and half of that is attributable to AI.”

DAVID SACKS: “I understand that there is a lot of concern about [AI] job disruption or job loss. That's not what we're seeing in the data so far. What we're actually seeing is job creation … We have a 4% GDP growth number right now, and half of that is attributable to AI.”

Chief Nerd

206,353 次观看 • 6 个月前

Suppose an AI model fully automates a $200k job. Its economic value - measured in contribution to GDP - will be both far more and far less than $200k. There are two ways of thinking about the model's economic value: (1) It'll be far more than $200k. After all, the human worker's labor was worth $200k; AI workers will have a bunch of advantages over humans, like not needing to sleep and being able to run in parallel, so their labor will be worth even more. (2) It'll be far less than $200k. Competition between labs might drive the price of AI down until it's basically equal to the cost of the GPUs and energy. And this is obviously way lower than the human worker's contribution to GDP. The important idea is that both are right. The marginal contribution to GDP of running an additional instance of this model will probably be relatively low. But we'll end up running way more copies of it, so the model's total contribution to GDP will be way higher than the human workers it replaced.

Suppose an AI model fully automates a $200k job. Its economic value - measured in contribution to GDP - will be both far more and far less than $200k. There are two ways of thinking about the model's economic value: (1) It'll be far more than $200k. After all, the human worker's labor was worth $200k; AI workers will have a bunch of advantages over humans, like not needing to sleep and being able to run in parallel, so their labor will be worth even more. (2) It'll be far less than $200k. Competition between labs might drive the price of AI down until it's basically equal to the cost of the GPUs and energy. And this is obviously way lower than the human worker's contribution to GDP. The important idea is that both are right. The marginal contribution to GDP of running an additional instance of this model will probably be relatively low. But we'll end up running way more copies of it, so the model's total contribution to GDP will be way higher than the human workers it replaced.

Dwarkesh Patel

70,547 次观看 • 4 天前

Ingraham: The AI boom, is that definitely going to lead to more American jobs? Not the h1b, foreign workers? Bessent: In general, we have seen the growth of jobs this year have gone to native-born Americans. Not illegals, not others. 100% of the job growth has gone to Americans

Ingraham: The AI boom, is that definitely going to lead to more American jobs? Not the h1b, foreign workers? Bessent: In general, we have seen the growth of jobs this year have gone to native-born Americans. Not illegals, not others. 100% of the job growth has gone to Americans

Acyn

123,880 次观看 • 6 个月前

MacCallum: You are saying you don't think there is any ai reorganization of job structure coming? Hassett: No, AI is making people more productive and that’s making it so that some firms can make the same amount of stuff with fewer workers but then those workers get another a job.

MacCallum: You are saying you don't think there is any ai reorganization of job structure coming? Hassett: No, AI is making people more productive and that’s making it so that some firms can make the same amount of stuff with fewer workers but then those workers get another a job.

Acyn

81,276 次观看 • 8 个月前

A little rant on the direction of AI. This is not about AI walls or anything. AI is getting smarter. This is about UX and design philosophy that all the big shops are using. They are treating users like hapless children, putting words in our mouths, and aligning AI's to "think just like humans" which is a net loss for humanity. Keep AI weird. Keep AI alien. That's a feature, not a bug. The more AI's think like us, the more useless they become, and the more infuriating.

A little rant on the direction of AI. This is not about AI walls or anything. AI is getting smarter. This is about UX and design philosophy that all the big shops are using. They are treating users like hapless children, putting words in our mouths, and aligning AI's to "think just like humans" which is a net loss for humanity. Keep AI weird. Keep AI alien. That's a feature, not a bug. The more AI's think like us, the more useless they become, and the more infuriating.

David Shapiro ⏩

17,201 次观看 • 10 个月前

We're over the Nick is appealing to "disaffected" young men and leading them down a "dark path" narrative Its not a pathology to want deportations and an end to censorship Actually having a job makes you MORE keenly aware of the censorship regime. The idea that Nick is leading young men anywhere that someone like Keeperman and Co. hasn't been leading them just to end up at The Blaze is a joke!

We're over the Nick is appealing to "disaffected" young men and leading them down a "dark path" narrative Its not a pathology to want deportations and an end to censorship Actually having a job makes you MORE keenly aware of the censorship regime. The idea that Nick is leading young men anywhere that someone like Keeperman and Co. hasn't been leading them just to end up at The Blaze is a joke!

BasilianThought

96,402 次观看 • 7 个月前

We're over the "Nick is appealing to 'disaffected' young men and leading them down a 'dark path'" narrative Its not a pathology to want deportations and an end to censorship Actually having a job makes you MORE keenly aware of the censorship regime. The idea that Nick is leading young men anywhere that someone like Keeperman and Co. hasn't been leading them just to end up at The Blaze is a joke!

We're over the "Nick is appealing to 'disaffected' young men and leading them down a 'dark path'" narrative Its not a pathology to want deportations and an end to censorship Actually having a job makes you MORE keenly aware of the censorship regime. The idea that Nick is leading young men anywhere that someone like Keeperman and Co. hasn't been leading them just to end up at The Blaze is a joke!

BasilianThought

11,610 次观看 • 18 天前

NEW— Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar responds to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ AI doomerism: “AI is a blue collar revolution.” “Not only are workers more productive, these companies are able to hire more. “The root of this doomerism— it’s a complete propaganda shtick out of Silicon Valley.”

NEW— Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar responds to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ AI doomerism: “AI is a blue collar revolution.” “Not only are workers more productive, these companies are able to hire more. “The root of this doomerism— it’s a complete propaganda shtick out of Silicon Valley.”

Jawwwn

62,454 次观看 • 6 个月前

If you are a B2B tech founder, you'd know implementation / deployment is a big bottleneck for any fast growing SaaS/AI, and in general is a drag on your company. "Necessary evil", as they say. We've launched Nitro AI to change the status quo. Not your crazy promise of autonomous impelmentations, but a very practical take at automating some of the key primitives of the jobs to be done. AI co-workers that help you automate the data transformation and validation, the configuration, the documentation, etc. Hours of your best consultants and product experts saved. Time that can be repurposed to do more for your existing customers, enable them to get more value. True Service Led Growth starts here. Watch the video and DM me!

If you are a B2B tech founder, you'd know implementation / deployment is a big bottleneck for any fast growing SaaS/AI, and in general is a drag on your company. "Necessary evil", as they say. We've launched Nitro AI to change the status quo. Not your crazy promise of autonomous impelmentations, but a very practical take at automating some of the key primitives of the jobs to be done. AI co-workers that help you automate the data transformation and validation, the configuration, the documentation, etc. Hours of your best consultants and product experts saved. Time that can be repurposed to do more for your existing customers, enable them to get more value. True Service Led Growth starts here. Watch the video and DM me!

Srikrishnan Ganesan

11,341 次观看 • 2 个月前

AOC: We rely on hundreds of thousands of home care workers across the country. This labor force is going to expand a lot as more of our parents reach older age, and these folks need to be paid a fair wage. These are some of the most exploited workers in the country. Oftentimes, their shifts are extremely long, and they have to work in very tough conditions. We need home healthcare workers to be paid a fair wage so that people can age with dignity and receive care at home with dignity

AOC: We rely on hundreds of thousands of home care workers across the country. This labor force is going to expand a lot as more of our parents reach older age, and these folks need to be paid a fair wage. These are some of the most exploited workers in the country. Oftentimes, their shifts are extremely long, and they have to work in very tough conditions. We need home healthcare workers to be paid a fair wage so that people can age with dignity and receive care at home with dignity

Acyn

47,301 次观看 • 3 个月前

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."

The All-In Podcast

164,027 次观看 • 1 年前

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 次观看 • 8 个月前

What a scam Mint ❌️ They scammed their team, they scammed their KOLS, and they scammed their community. They intended not to pay the KOLS, who were essential to the growth of this project, because they would simply "sell and aren't interested in what they're building." They ended up paying them 70% of the real value they were owed. Not to mention their poor investors, who promised and assured them in advance that they had closed OKX, Kucoin, and Bybit. @optimismFUND Optimism you shouldn't have these types of actors in the Web3 ecosystem. Name of scammers: @Dannie0x29 ZK and I have much more to show you!

What a scam Mint ❌️ They scammed their team, they scammed their KOLS, and they scammed their community. They intended not to pay the KOLS, who were essential to the growth of this project, because they would simply "sell and aren't interested in what they're building." They ended up paying them 70% of the real value they were owed. Not to mention their poor investors, who promised and assured them in advance that they had closed OKX, Kucoin, and Bybit. @optimismFUND Optimism you shouldn't have these types of actors in the Web3 ecosystem. Name of scammers: @Dannie0x29 ZK and I have much more to show you!

MatiGallardo.bnb

14,284 次观看 • 1 年前

Researchers found that D.C., Maryland, and Virginia are among the places where AI has some of the highest potential to either wipe out or transform jobs. In Maryland, researchers estimate nearly 40% of the workforce is in occupations where AI can do the job. D.C. ranks even higher, with more than 55% of workers in jobs threatened by AI. MORE:

Researchers found that D.C., Maryland, and Virginia are among the places where AI has some of the highest potential to either wipe out or transform jobs. In Maryland, researchers estimate nearly 40% of the workforce is in occupations where AI can do the job. D.C. ranks even higher, with more than 55% of workers in jobs threatened by AI. MORE:

7News DC

37,834 次观看 • 1 个月前

$AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.$

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.

Action Model

46,918 次观看 • 5 个月前