Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

.Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think central banks will realize that there are limitations to gold and limitations to Bitcoin, and will, as a result, seek out a completely new cryptographic paradigm that they can control on their balance sheet - one that is fungible, tradable, and completely secure and private....

arjunkhemani's profile picture

Arjun Khemani

34,117 subscribers

241,381 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"The way they achieve their private transactions is exactly the trust me bro, there's a sequencer who has a reputation and you send all your transactions to that sequencer" Aztec Labs CEO Joe Andrews on why Canton's privacy is just trusting an intermediary, not real cryptographic privacy "It's what I touched on earlier, privacy through intermediaries versus cryptographic privacy. The way they achieve their private stablecoins or private transactions is exactly the trust me bro, there's a sequencer who has a reputation, and you send all your transactions to that sequencer and trust, with a non-credible commitment, that they're not going to monetize that data or sell it to anyone" "So while it jumps on the privacy bandwagon, it's basically a bunch of banks trying to adopt a different tech stack" "I think it should come out in the wash, at least for these use cases that require strong credible commitments and actual privacy that's backed by cryptographic guarantees"
0:53

"The way they achieve their private transactions is exactly the trust me bro, there's a sequencer who has a reputation and you send all your transactions to that sequencer" Aztec Labs CEO Joe Andrews on why Canton's privacy is just trusting an intermediary, not real cryptographic privacy "It's what I touched on earlier, privacy through intermediaries versus cryptographic privacy. The way they achieve their private stablecoins or private transactions is exactly the trust me bro, there's a sequencer who has a reputation, and you send all your transactions to that sequencer and trust, with a non-credible commitment, that they're not going to monetize that data or sell it to anyone" "So while it jumps on the privacy bandwagon, it's basically a bunch of banks trying to adopt a different tech stack" "I think it should come out in the wash, at least for these use cases that require strong credible commitments and actual privacy that's backed by cryptographic guarantees"

Laura Shin

12,679 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Chamath says OpenAI and Anthropic could be $5 to $10 trillion companies each if they remain a duopoly "I suspect revenues are going to crank at OpenAI and Anthropic and the open labs for a while. But again, that's not the important thing." "If you're thinking about valuation, the markets will look five to 10 years out to answer that question, they're not going to give you a premium valuation on something that they feel could be fragile in the first two to three years." "Somebody has to answer that question precisely. Because if the answer is that it is a duopoly, then there is no risk to the revenue five to 10 years from now, these things are $5 to $10 trillion companies each." "But if there are harnesses that cut the token consumption, because you stop wasting tokens to get to the same output, then it's a little bit more of a question mark. And I think that'll need to get sorted out."
1:11

Chamath says OpenAI and Anthropic could be $5 to $10 trillion companies each if they remain a duopoly "I suspect revenues are going to crank at OpenAI and Anthropic and the open labs for a while. But again, that's not the important thing." "If you're thinking about valuation, the markets will look five to 10 years out to answer that question, they're not going to give you a premium valuation on something that they feel could be fragile in the first two to three years." "Somebody has to answer that question precisely. Because if the answer is that it is a duopoly, then there is no risk to the revenue five to 10 years from now, these things are $5 to $10 trillion companies each." "But if there are harnesses that cut the token consumption, because you stop wasting tokens to get to the same output, then it's a little bit more of a question mark. And I think that'll need to get sorted out."

dnap

275,325 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨💵Peter Schiff: Sanctions on Russia🇷🇺 marked the beginning of the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency “I was very critical at the time of the Biden sanctions against Russia, and I said that would come back to bite the US because I knew how critical the dollar’s reserve currency status was to propping up the US economy. I said that Biden just sent a very loud message, a warning to the world that they need to get rid of their dollars, that they could be the next Russia. If they do something that the United States doesn’t like, they’ve got that weapon. And so why would you want to enable the United States with a weapon to use against you? So I said this is going to result in a lot of selling of US dollars and US Treasuries. And that’s exactly what happened. The reason that gold is over $3300 an ounce is because central banks are getting rid of their dollars. And one of the reasons that the yield on US Treasuries just hit a new multi-year high and continues to rise is because we don’t have all the foreign buyers that Biden scared away. I think we’ve already established the precedent that the dollar is not sacrosanct. And if you’re a nation and you have US dollars, you have US Treasuries and you own them in good faith in that you would trust that they would be a reserve asset, a neutral reserve asset. We’ve already established a precedent that that’s not the case, that we can yank the rug out from under you whenever we want. So I think regardless of what Trump does now, if I was in China or any of these countries, especially China, because, you know, we vilify China, we say China’s our enemy. Okay, well, if China’s our enemy, why the hell do they want to leave themselves vulnerable by owning all of our bonds? And it’s not just Treasuries that they own. They own mortgage-backed securities. They have a tremendous amount of dollar-denominated assets, so I would be completely divesting as quickly as I could.” -Peter Schiff on Going Underground
2:35

🚨💵Peter Schiff: Sanctions on Russia🇷🇺 marked the beginning of the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency “I was very critical at the time of the Biden sanctions against Russia, and I said that would come back to bite the US because I knew how critical the dollar’s reserve currency status was to propping up the US economy. I said that Biden just sent a very loud message, a warning to the world that they need to get rid of their dollars, that they could be the next Russia. If they do something that the United States doesn’t like, they’ve got that weapon. And so why would you want to enable the United States with a weapon to use against you? So I said this is going to result in a lot of selling of US dollars and US Treasuries. And that’s exactly what happened. The reason that gold is over $3300 an ounce is because central banks are getting rid of their dollars. And one of the reasons that the yield on US Treasuries just hit a new multi-year high and continues to rise is because we don’t have all the foreign buyers that Biden scared away. I think we’ve already established the precedent that the dollar is not sacrosanct. And if you’re a nation and you have US dollars, you have US Treasuries and you own them in good faith in that you would trust that they would be a reserve asset, a neutral reserve asset. We’ve already established a precedent that that’s not the case, that we can yank the rug out from under you whenever we want. So I think regardless of what Trump does now, if I was in China or any of these countries, especially China, because, you know, we vilify China, we say China’s our enemy. Okay, well, if China’s our enemy, why the hell do they want to leave themselves vulnerable by owning all of our bonds? And it’s not just Treasuries that they own. They own mortgage-backed securities. They have a tremendous amount of dollar-denominated assets, so I would be completely divesting as quickly as I could.” -Peter Schiff on Going Underground

Going Underground

16,526 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Demis Hassabis: "I think there is a need for some great philosophers. Where are they? The great next philosophers... I think we're going to need that to help navigate society to that next step. AGI and ASI is going to change humanity and the human condition."
0:24

Demis Hassabis: "I think there is a need for some great philosophers. Where are they? The great next philosophers... I think we're going to need that to help navigate society to that next step. AGI and ASI is going to change humanity and the human condition."

Smoke-away

124,498 просмотров • 1 год назад

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31
4:30

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

Presidency | Rwanda

47,115 просмотров • 1 год назад

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd: "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust... [and] that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system... [so] gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), who is also the founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Michael Farris (Michael Farris) posted to YouTube on January 13, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust. I think the big, the moves in gold and silver are really discounting a lack of trust and fear of what is coming and what it's going to look like. And, and also it's also telling you that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system. "And Bitcoin, interestingly enough, has stalled out. It's down 20% since October, the high in October and Bitcoin is barely up today. So, you know, there was always this thesis around Bitcoin that when when there's a new monetary system comes, it's going to, it's going to be protection against, you know, any of that kind of uncertainty. It's increasing. It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much. "And Bitcoin, unfortunately, is very highly correlated to the Nasdaq and it's disconnected from the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq and Bitcoin have disconnected temporarily. Generally speaking, they're highly correlated. So what does that say? Does that say Nasdaq is going to catch up down to Bitcoin or is Bitcoin going to rally back up? I think that the Nasdaq is going to go down to bitcoin. So that's where we are."
1:15

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd: "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust... [and] that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system... [so] gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), who is also the founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Michael Farris (Michael Farris) posted to YouTube on January 13, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust. I think the big, the moves in gold and silver are really discounting a lack of trust and fear of what is coming and what it's going to look like. And, and also it's also telling you that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system. "And Bitcoin, interestingly enough, has stalled out. It's down 20% since October, the high in October and Bitcoin is barely up today. So, you know, there was always this thesis around Bitcoin that when when there's a new monetary system comes, it's going to, it's going to be protection against, you know, any of that kind of uncertainty. It's increasing. It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much. "And Bitcoin, unfortunately, is very highly correlated to the Nasdaq and it's disconnected from the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq and Bitcoin have disconnected temporarily. Generally speaking, they're highly correlated. So what does that say? Does that say Nasdaq is going to catch up down to Bitcoin or is Bitcoin going to rally back up? I think that the Nasdaq is going to go down to bitcoin. So that's where we are."

Sense Receptor

136,648 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Avichal Garg on why he’s bullish ETH “What ETH has that is very difficult to reproduce is credible neutrality. And if you think there’s going to be a global financial system settlement layer, I think that is the critical thing — that trust and neutrality is basically irreproducible… ETH has that.” “For me the turning point for ETH was when the United States decided to seize Russian assets and weaponize the dollar… If you’re Germany, France, India, Turkey, Brazil, or most of the world, you’re looking at the world and saying, I don’t think I want to be allied with the Chinese — India certainly doesn’t — but now I’m worried that if I ally with the US and then they want me to do something and I don’t do it, they’re just going to take all my money? What you want is a US dollar denominated system that the US cannot single-handedly decide to boot you from and where the United States cannot just take all your assets. That’s literally what Ethereum is.” “[Ethereum is] a US dollar denominated system, that nobody in the world controls, that anybody can mutually agree to transact upon, where the United States can’t steal your assets — and there are ways to structure synthetic dollar assets that are not sitting in US banks, just like the Eurodollar system. What is that worth? I think that’s worth a lot of money.” “If you’re any bank, country, or central bank, [Ethereum] is the only place you can do that. Now how does that get valued? Does that mean ETH becomes a store of value as the endogenous backing asset for the thing which can be used as collateral? We tend to think that those things are true, and we’ve written about this.” “You can go talk to anybody on Wall Street. Where are they building? Everybody’s trying to build on ETH. Where’s Coinbase building? Where’s Robinhood building? Where’s SoFi building? Underneath it all, all of the activity for that sort of behavior — geopolitically, central bank level, important behavior — is happening right now in this space [on Ethereum], and I think it will take some time for people to appreciate and underwrite that.” “In 10 years people will look around and be like, ‘Oh wow, that’s really important, and I should own a piece of that.’ I don’t know when it rerates, but I think at some point people will get their heads around that there is something unique to this thing that nobody else will be able to reproduce, and that thing is valuable.” Source: Empire 🟪 (Jun 2026) Read our report "Why Permissionless Infrastructure Wins" below 👇
5:37

Avichal Garg on why he’s bullish ETH “What ETH has that is very difficult to reproduce is credible neutrality. And if you think there’s going to be a global financial system settlement layer, I think that is the critical thing — that trust and neutrality is basically irreproducible… ETH has that.” “For me the turning point for ETH was when the United States decided to seize Russian assets and weaponize the dollar… If you’re Germany, France, India, Turkey, Brazil, or most of the world, you’re looking at the world and saying, I don’t think I want to be allied with the Chinese — India certainly doesn’t — but now I’m worried that if I ally with the US and then they want me to do something and I don’t do it, they’re just going to take all my money? What you want is a US dollar denominated system that the US cannot single-handedly decide to boot you from and where the United States cannot just take all your assets. That’s literally what Ethereum is.” “[Ethereum is] a US dollar denominated system, that nobody in the world controls, that anybody can mutually agree to transact upon, where the United States can’t steal your assets — and there are ways to structure synthetic dollar assets that are not sitting in US banks, just like the Eurodollar system. What is that worth? I think that’s worth a lot of money.” “If you’re any bank, country, or central bank, [Ethereum] is the only place you can do that. Now how does that get valued? Does that mean ETH becomes a store of value as the endogenous backing asset for the thing which can be used as collateral? We tend to think that those things are true, and we’ve written about this.” “You can go talk to anybody on Wall Street. Where are they building? Everybody’s trying to build on ETH. Where’s Coinbase building? Where’s Robinhood building? Where’s SoFi building? Underneath it all, all of the activity for that sort of behavior — geopolitically, central bank level, important behavior — is happening right now in this space [on Ethereum], and I think it will take some time for people to appreciate and underwrite that.” “In 10 years people will look around and be like, ‘Oh wow, that’s really important, and I should own a piece of that.’ I don’t know when it rerates, but I think at some point people will get their heads around that there is something unique to this thing that nobody else will be able to reproduce, and that thing is valuable.” Source: Empire 🟪 (Jun 2026) Read our report "Why Permissionless Infrastructure Wins" below 👇

Etherealize

42,741 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Reporter: Next week there is a deadline in the Comey case. How confident are you that that case will survive to trial and result in a conviction? Blanche: I am certainly not going to act like I have a crystal ball and predict what's going to happen with that…
1:10

Reporter: Next week there is a deadline in the Comey case. How confident are you that that case will survive to trial and result in a conviction? Blanche: I am certainly not going to act like I have a crystal ball and predict what's going to happen with that…

Acyn

34,411 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Thought this was incredibly insightful from Sundar. Too many people are trying to figure out what the world looks like 10 years from now, while AI is moving at a pace that makes the next year itself feel so exciting Sundar Pichai (CEO of Google): "I think you can paralyze yourself thinking 10 years ahead, but we are fortunate to be in a moment where you can think a year ahead and the curve is so steep It’s exciting to just do that year ahead. Whereas in the past, you may need to sit and envision five years out. The models are going to be dramatically different in a year’s time." A lot of the same applies to investing. In a world that is so uncertain, trying to predict what valuation will be in 10 years is not a helpful exercise Instead, you should try to think about what AI capabilities will exist next year and how that impacts the companies you allocate capital towards Exciting times to live in
1:25

Thought this was incredibly insightful from Sundar. Too many people are trying to figure out what the world looks like 10 years from now, while AI is moving at a pace that makes the next year itself feel so exciting Sundar Pichai (CEO of Google): "I think you can paralyze yourself thinking 10 years ahead, but we are fortunate to be in a moment where you can think a year ahead and the curve is so steep It’s exciting to just do that year ahead. Whereas in the past, you may need to sit and envision five years out. The models are going to be dramatically different in a year’s time." A lot of the same applies to investing. In a world that is so uncertain, trying to predict what valuation will be in 10 years is not a helpful exercise Instead, you should try to think about what AI capabilities will exist next year and how that impacts the companies you allocate capital towards Exciting times to live in

Boring_Business

45,140 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”
1:16

Elon Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”

Zen

37,173 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya
1:02

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya

Overton

78,071 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”
0:47

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

RedWave Press

864,210 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NEW: Billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya praises Trump's tariffs on China, rips the global elite for trying to "scare-monger" him. "For the last forty years, whether they want to admit it or not, Donald Trump has been right." "What you see right now is them violently trying to push back and trying to create a narrative." "If you opened up the papers, there's an entire wing of the media that is now trying to say that the president blinked." "Why do they want us to think that? I think they want us to think that because they want to believe that they can talk about the stock market and then affect policy every five and ten minutes." "We are in a unique moment in time where we have the ability to reset the global order, and we have to follow through."
6:09

NEW: Billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya praises Trump's tariffs on China, rips the global elite for trying to "scare-monger" him. "For the last forty years, whether they want to admit it or not, Donald Trump has been right." "What you see right now is them violently trying to push back and trying to create a narrative." "If you opened up the papers, there's an entire wing of the media that is now trying to say that the president blinked." "Why do they want us to think that? I think they want us to think that because they want to believe that they can talk about the stock market and then affect policy every five and ten minutes." "We are in a unique moment in time where we have the ability to reset the global order, and we have to follow through."

Collin Rugg

375,295 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”
2:11

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Women aren't naturally crazy. The reason that so many women act crazy is because their hormones and nervous systems are completely messed up from things like hair dyes, shampoos, conditioners, body lotions, vaccines, ultra processed foods and birth control pills. A lot of the products that are sold to women are completely unnecessary but even the ones that are necessary can be replaced with something natural. In order for a woman to not be crazy, she needs to feel safe and secure. The way to do this is by not putting on products that mess up your hormones and living in an environment that's not overly chaotic. The reason that women like to shop so much is because it mimics picking berries in nature. The moral of the story is if you're a woman and you don't want to be crazy you need to lock in the products that you're using and the environment that you're living.
0:51

Women aren't naturally crazy. The reason that so many women act crazy is because their hormones and nervous systems are completely messed up from things like hair dyes, shampoos, conditioners, body lotions, vaccines, ultra processed foods and birth control pills. A lot of the products that are sold to women are completely unnecessary but even the ones that are necessary can be replaced with something natural. In order for a woman to not be crazy, she needs to feel safe and secure. The way to do this is by not putting on products that mess up your hormones and living in an environment that's not overly chaotic. The reason that women like to shop so much is because it mimics picking berries in nature. The moral of the story is if you're a woman and you don't want to be crazy you need to lock in the products that you're using and the environment that you're living.

Riley Check

15,638 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”
1:30

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,111,682 просмотров • 2 лет назад

PabloReports: Are you going to be signing onto the new Epstein Files Transparency Act? Magaziner: I just did. It’s important to send a message that this country should not have two sets of rules, one for the rich and powerful and one for everybody else. Under the Trump administration, the rich and powerful think that they don’t have to follow the law. We have to send a message that there will be accountability.
1:55

PabloReports: Are you going to be signing onto the new Epstein Files Transparency Act? Magaziner: I just did. It’s important to send a message that this country should not have two sets of rules, one for the rich and powerful and one for everybody else. Under the Trump administration, the rich and powerful think that they don’t have to follow the law. We have to send a message that there will be accountability.

Acyn

21,470 просмотров • 2 дней назад