Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The...

HustleBitch_'s profile picture

HustleBitch

357,393 subscribers

1,607,556 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.
2:02

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

Liz Wheeler

19,316 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

SNEAKO said on Day 1 of Charlie Kirk being assassinated that it was likely done by ISRAEL😳🇮🇱 The ATF just announced that they are unable to match the bullet to the alleged rifle used by Tyler Robinson…
3:57

SNEAKO said on Day 1 of Charlie Kirk being assassinated that it was likely done by ISRAEL😳🇮🇱 The ATF just announced that they are unable to match the bullet to the alleged rifle used by Tyler Robinson…

SNEAKO HQ

133,603 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?
2:03

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?

HustleBitch

23,204 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.
2:01

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.

Liz Wheeler

16,481 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨Tyler Robinson’s DNA showed up on the rifle used to kill Charlie Kirk, with odds of 1 in over a trillion that it belonged to anyone else. Forensic expert say it’s not just enough to go to trial—it’s enough to indict Tyler Robinson.
0:50

🚨Tyler Robinson’s DNA showed up on the rifle used to kill Charlie Kirk, with odds of 1 in over a trillion that it belonged to anyone else. Forensic expert say it’s not just enough to go to trial—it’s enough to indict Tyler Robinson.

Grace Ashford

52,257 просмотров • 14 дней назад

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.
1:59

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,467 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…
1:36

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…

The Patriot Voice

77,096 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

BREAKING ANALYSIS: BOMBSHELL New Court Filing Claims Bullet Used To Assassinate Charlie Kirk Did NOT Match The Rifle Used By Tyler Robinson! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret, Nate Cornacchia, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Analyze Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation! This Is A Must-Watch/Share Interview! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:
28:33

BREAKING ANALYSIS: BOMBSHELL New Court Filing Claims Bullet Used To Assassinate Charlie Kirk Did NOT Match The Rifle Used By Tyler Robinson! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret, Nate Cornacchia, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Analyze Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation! This Is A Must-Watch/Share Interview! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:

Alex Jones

202,544 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The new “evidence” that the bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk doesn't match the gun is total bullshit “The legal defense for Tyler Robinson, which makes sense, said the bullet couldn't be identified, not that it doesn't match.”
1:01

The new “evidence” that the bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk doesn't match the gun is total bullshit “The legal defense for Tyler Robinson, which makes sense, said the bullet couldn't be identified, not that it doesn't match.”

Fuentes Updates

70,952 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

UTAH INVESTIGATOR: DNA was collected from a screwdriver and rifle in the Charlie Kirk murder and it was matched to Tyler Robinson
0:59

UTAH INVESTIGATOR: DNA was collected from a screwdriver and rifle in the Charlie Kirk murder and it was matched to Tyler Robinson

The Post Millennial

77,301 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

NEW: DNA from FIVE different people was found on the rifle allegedly used by Tyler Robinson to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
4:47

NEW: DNA from FIVE different people was found on the rifle allegedly used by Tyler Robinson to assassinate Charlie Kirk.

Stew Peters

38,112 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I saw two stories about the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk and they couldn't have been more different. One story said, “The bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson”. That headline is designed to raise your heart rate: WHAT?! They don't match?! What else did they lie about?! The second headline emphasized important context: there was an “inconclusive link between the bullet from the autopsy and the rifle.” So, the bullet was too destroyed to tell if it matched at all. That's a huge difference. This is the key to surviving in today's insane media landscape. When you read a headline, ask yourself: what kind of narrative are they trying to build in my mind? Are they telling me what to think or giving me the facts needed to make my own decision?
5:59

I saw two stories about the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk and they couldn't have been more different. One story said, “The bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson”. That headline is designed to raise your heart rate: WHAT?! They don't match?! What else did they lie about?! The second headline emphasized important context: there was an “inconclusive link between the bullet from the autopsy and the rifle.” So, the bullet was too destroyed to tell if it matched at all. That's a huge difference. This is the key to surviving in today's insane media landscape. When you read a headline, ask yourself: what kind of narrative are they trying to build in my mind? Are they telling me what to think or giving me the facts needed to make my own decision?

Glenn Beck

216,914 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Today was Doomsday for the Charlie Kirk Murder Industrial Complex. For the true crime SSRI wine moms and failed Only Fans models turned internet detectives — the grift is officially over. Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just admitted to the court that… - Tyler Robinson was on campus to kill Charlie Kirk - Tyler Robinson brought a gun to campus to kill Charlie Kirk - positively ID Tyler Robinson in the campus surveillance video we watched in the courtroom - Admit Tyler Robinson walked with a firearm concealed in his pants to the rooftop - The rooftop surveillance video is the “strongest evidence” the prosecution has - The rooftop surveillance video shows the “shooter” in the prone position over Charlie Kirk for 44 seconds - Tyler Robinson's defense team confirms Charlie Kirk was shot by a bullet travelling at a downward angle from a shooter atop the Losee Center - Tyler Robinson’s confessions to Lance Twiggs about killing Charlie Kirk are real - Tyler Robinson only intended to Kill Charlie Kirk — and did not kill anyone else. This is critical because… - The entire filing is an argument that focused on fighting the death penalty rather than arguing that Tyler Robinson is innocent of taking the shot The lawyers aren’t claiming Robinson wasn’t there, or that he was eating at a steak restaurant, or a patsy of any kind. The defense is now begging for MERCY from the Judge in a last ditch effort to save Tyler from the death penalty. We are all owed an apology from the Charlie Kirk Murder Industrial Complex. Will they give back the millions they made selling lies… Or will they accuse Tyler Robinson’s defense of being in on it with their ‘fedslop’ filing? Watch and see…
19:32

Today was Doomsday for the Charlie Kirk Murder Industrial Complex. For the true crime SSRI wine moms and failed Only Fans models turned internet detectives — the grift is officially over. Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just admitted to the court that… - Tyler Robinson was on campus to kill Charlie Kirk - Tyler Robinson brought a gun to campus to kill Charlie Kirk - positively ID Tyler Robinson in the campus surveillance video we watched in the courtroom - Admit Tyler Robinson walked with a firearm concealed in his pants to the rooftop - The rooftop surveillance video is the “strongest evidence” the prosecution has - The rooftop surveillance video shows the “shooter” in the prone position over Charlie Kirk for 44 seconds - Tyler Robinson's defense team confirms Charlie Kirk was shot by a bullet travelling at a downward angle from a shooter atop the Losee Center - Tyler Robinson’s confessions to Lance Twiggs about killing Charlie Kirk are real - Tyler Robinson only intended to Kill Charlie Kirk — and did not kill anyone else. This is critical because… - The entire filing is an argument that focused on fighting the death penalty rather than arguing that Tyler Robinson is innocent of taking the shot The lawyers aren’t claiming Robinson wasn’t there, or that he was eating at a steak restaurant, or a patsy of any kind. The defense is now begging for MERCY from the Judge in a last ditch effort to save Tyler from the death penalty. We are all owed an apology from the Charlie Kirk Murder Industrial Complex. Will they give back the millions they made selling lies… Or will they accuse Tyler Robinson’s defense of being in on it with their ‘fedslop’ filing? Watch and see…

Benny Johnson

727,399 просмотров • 8 дней назад

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
14:14

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A new court filing reveals defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, claim an ATF analysis could not conclusively connect the bullet that killed Kirk to the gun Robinson allegedly used. Now the lawyers are asking to delay Robinson's preliminary hearing to review the evidence. CBS News' Carter Evans has more.
0:56

A new court filing reveals defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, claim an ATF analysis could not conclusively connect the bullet that killed Kirk to the gun Robinson allegedly used. Now the lawyers are asking to delay Robinson's preliminary hearing to review the evidence. CBS News' Carter Evans has more.

CBS News

22,202 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Candace Owens just said she doesn't believe that Charlie Kirk was hit with Tyler Robinson's alleged rifle and that the Feds may be building a case on "corruption." She concludes that Charlie was likely shot from much closer in the audience.
1:22

Candace Owens just said she doesn't believe that Charlie Kirk was hit with Tyler Robinson's alleged rifle and that the Feds may be building a case on "corruption." She concludes that Charlie was likely shot from much closer in the audience.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

47,548 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨Daily Mail ran a MISLEADING headline about the Tyler Robinson case to farm clicks… They imply the bullet didn’t match the suspect’s rifle, but buried in the article is the truth: the bullet was too fragmented to match any weapon. That’s not “bombshell” evidence, that’s basic forensic reality. Stop falling for headline manipulation.
7:26

🚨Daily Mail ran a MISLEADING headline about the Tyler Robinson case to farm clicks… They imply the bullet didn’t match the suspect’s rifle, but buried in the article is the truth: the bullet was too fragmented to match any weapon. That’s not “bombshell” evidence, that’s basic forensic reality. Stop falling for headline manipulation.

Brandon Tatum

39,671 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover-Up CONFIRMED! 2 Prominent Green Berets Debate The ATF's Findings That The Bullet That Shot Charlie Kirk Does NOT Match The Rifle Supposedly Used By Tyler Robinson! Gary Melton & Nate Cornacchia Join Alex Jones For A Must-Watch Heated Discussion Concerning The Official Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative Imploding, The Iran War, The Future Of MAGA, & More! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:
54:09

🚨Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover-Up CONFIRMED! 2 Prominent Green Berets Debate The ATF's Findings That The Bullet That Shot Charlie Kirk Does NOT Match The Rifle Supposedly Used By Tyler Robinson! Gary Melton & Nate Cornacchia Join Alex Jones For A Must-Watch Heated Discussion Concerning The Official Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative Imploding, The Iran War, The Future Of MAGA, & More! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:

Alex Jones

451,563 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️
3:39

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”
0:38

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”

Ian Miles Cheong

27,111 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад