Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF... forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇show more

Project Constitution

293,678 subscribers

14,453 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 BOMBSHELL: ATF Ballistics Expert ADMITS the Rifle Had DUST Inside the Barrel When Recovered — PROOF The Gun Had NOT Been Recently Fired 😱 During cross-examination, ATF firearms examiner Samantha Karner confirmed under oath that when the alleged murder rifle was recovered, there was dust and debris inside the barrel. When asked if she inspected the interior of the barrel, she replied: “I believe my notes state that debris and dust was observed in the inside of the barrel.” This is significant because if the rifle had been recently fired (as prosecutors claim), the force of the shot would have blown out any dust or debris inside the barrel. The presence of dust strongly suggests the gun had not been fired recently. This is yet another major piece of exculpatory evidence that undermines the claim that Tyler Robinson used this rifle to shoot Charlie Kirk. TAG Candace Owens, RT and watch the other damning exculpatory evidence revealed in my post below.👇

🚨 BOMBSHELL: ATF Ballistics Expert ADMITS the Rifle Had DUST Inside the Barrel When Recovered — PROOF The Gun Had NOT Been Recently Fired 😱 During cross-examination, ATF firearms examiner Samantha Karner confirmed under oath that when the alleged murder rifle was recovered, there was dust and debris inside the barrel. When asked if she inspected the interior of the barrel, she replied: “I believe my notes state that debris and dust was observed in the inside of the barrel.” This is significant because if the rifle had been recently fired (as prosecutors claim), the force of the shot would have blown out any dust or debris inside the barrel. The presence of dust strongly suggests the gun had not been fired recently. This is yet another major piece of exculpatory evidence that undermines the claim that Tyler Robinson used this rifle to shoot Charlie Kirk. TAG Candace Owens, RT and watch the other damning exculpatory evidence revealed in my post below.👇

Project Constitution

379,136 views • 1 month ago

DNA expert from ATF testifying: Trigger and Trigger guard had DNA from multiple people. Tyler Robinson's DNA was the most degraded. Thanks to Candace Owens for publishing these videos that the media and the Zionist influencers ignore.

DNA expert from ATF testifying: Trigger and Trigger guard had DNA from multiple people. Tyler Robinson's DNA was the most degraded. Thanks to Candace Owens for publishing these videos that the media and the Zionist influencers ignore.

The Dibster

32,708 views • 1 month ago

ATF DNA section chief testifies that the DNA found on rifle was “ONE TRILLION times more likely that it originated from Tyler Robinson” than other individuals: Robinson’s DNA was found all over the rifle, including the trigger, stock, barrel, etc.

ATF DNA section chief testifies that the DNA found on rifle was “ONE TRILLION times more likely that it originated from Tyler Robinson” than other individuals: Robinson’s DNA was found all over the rifle, including the trigger, stock, barrel, etc.

Katie Daviscourt 📸

59,622 views • 1 month ago

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,506 views • 4 months ago

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

HustleBitch

1,607,895 views • 5 months ago

🚨Watch Candace Owens cherry-pick and mischaracterise the testimony of the ATF's DNA expert - CUTTING AWAY before her audience sees the parts that completely undermine her narrative. Candace wants her audience to believe that because the DNA profile attributed to Tyler Robinson as the major contributor showed signs of degradation, that must mean the DNA was old - and therefore couldn't belong to the shooter. The problem? That's not what either DNA expert testified. In fact, moments after the cherry-picked clip Candace used, the ATF expert confirms she cannot determine when the DNA was deposited on the trigger or trigger guard. And just two days earlier, the FBI's DNA expert explained that degradation can result from many factors, such as, heat, humidity, cleaning, and other environmental factors, adding: "I really can't tell why an item is degraded." -The ATF expert did not testify that degradation meant the DNA was old -She did not testify it made the DNA unusable -She did not testify that it was inconsistent with the shooter That's Candace's conclusion - not the expert's testimony. And despite the degradation, the ATF expert still testified that the DNA profile was at least one trillion times more likely if it originated from Tyler Robinson as the major contributor than from four unknown unrelated individuals. That's exactly where Candace cuts away. It's another example of taking one sentence from an expert, stripping away the context, and presenting a conclusion the witness never reached. An honest investigator follows the evidence wherever it leads. Candace takes whatever evidence supports her predetermined narrative, distorts it - and hides the rest. The opposite of someone trying to find the truth.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

77,742 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”

Ian Miles Cheong

27,111 views • 8 months ago

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

11,510 views • 1 month ago

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Just Listed The Biggest Lies In The Tyler Robinson Case 😳 Candace Owens put together a running list of the major lies the public has been fed about the Tyler Robinson case — and the pattern is impossible to ignore. Here’s what we were told versus what has actually held up: ▫️Tyler’s father bravely turned him in → False. He was pressured and told he had no other option. The Bill Ackman $1 million narrative was also false. ▫️There was 4K video of Tyler taking the shot → No such video exists. ▫️Tyler and/or his lover were transgender → Both false. ▫️The motive was political hatred over LGBTQ issues → Debunked. Lance testified they never spoke about politics or Charlie Kirk. ▫️There was footage of Tyler assembling the rifle on the roof → No footage exists. ▫️Clear video of Tyler’s car on campus → Only blurry footage of a similar vehicle has been shown. ▫️Tyler was suicidal → False. ▫️His gun was tied to the bullet fragment from the autopsy → The ATF testimony showed the fragment did not match a .30-06. ▫️His DNA and prints were all over the gun → Severe omission. At least five other sets of prints were found (including Lance’s), and Tyler’s were the most degraded. Candace’s question cuts through the noise: What evidence has actually been entered into the public domain that proves Tyler Robinson did this beyond a reasonable doubt? Right now the narrative is left clinging to a text confession taken from Lance’s phone — a phone that was conveniently broken right where the timestamp would be. They call us conspiracy theorists. They’re the ones asking us to trust a story that keeps collapsing. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Just Listed The Biggest Lies In The Tyler Robinson Case 😳 Candace Owens put together a running list of the major lies the public has been fed about the Tyler Robinson case — and the pattern is impossible to ignore. Here’s what we were told versus what has actually held up: ▫️Tyler’s father bravely turned him in → False. He was pressured and told he had no other option. The Bill Ackman $1 million narrative was also false. ▫️There was 4K video of Tyler taking the shot → No such video exists. ▫️Tyler and/or his lover were transgender → Both false. ▫️The motive was political hatred over LGBTQ issues → Debunked. Lance testified they never spoke about politics or Charlie Kirk. ▫️There was footage of Tyler assembling the rifle on the roof → No footage exists. ▫️Clear video of Tyler’s car on campus → Only blurry footage of a similar vehicle has been shown. ▫️Tyler was suicidal → False. ▫️His gun was tied to the bullet fragment from the autopsy → The ATF testimony showed the fragment did not match a .30-06. ▫️His DNA and prints were all over the gun → Severe omission. At least five other sets of prints were found (including Lance’s), and Tyler’s were the most degraded. Candace’s question cuts through the noise: What evidence has actually been entered into the public domain that proves Tyler Robinson did this beyond a reasonable doubt? Right now the narrative is left clinging to a text confession taken from Lance’s phone — a phone that was conveniently broken right where the timestamp would be. They call us conspiracy theorists. They’re the ones asking us to trust a story that keeps collapsing. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

13,345 views • 29 days ago

‼️PART 1: Candace Owens Highlights Major EXCULPATORY Evidence That Undermines the Case Against Tyler Robinson — Video Evidence & Witness Testimony 🔍👀 In her first episode back, Candace Owens walked through several key pieces of evidence from Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing that directly contradict the official narrative. She pointed out that the surveillance footage shown in court was extremely blurry and showed multiple unidentifiable young men with similar builds and clothing. She also noted that the Dodge Challenger captured on camera had dual exhaust pipes, while Tyler Robinson’s actual car has a single exhaust — a clear mismatch that was presented as his vehicle. Even more damaging, a witness who captured Ring camera footage of a gray Challenger near campus that night told police she saw a bald man driving with three other people in the car. Additionally, Tyler Robinson has a timestamped receipt showing he was eating at Penguin’s Steakhouse at 9:47 PM — three hours away from UVU — which completely destroys the timeline of the Discord messages he allegedly sent that night. This is not the slam-dunk case they’ve been trying to sell the public. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

‼️PART 1: Candace Owens Highlights Major EXCULPATORY Evidence That Undermines the Case Against Tyler Robinson — Video Evidence & Witness Testimony 🔍👀 In her first episode back, Candace Owens walked through several key pieces of evidence from Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing that directly contradict the official narrative. She pointed out that the surveillance footage shown in court was extremely blurry and showed multiple unidentifiable young men with similar builds and clothing. She also noted that the Dodge Challenger captured on camera had dual exhaust pipes, while Tyler Robinson’s actual car has a single exhaust — a clear mismatch that was presented as his vehicle. Even more damaging, a witness who captured Ring camera footage of a gray Challenger near campus that night told police she saw a bald man driving with three other people in the car. Additionally, Tyler Robinson has a timestamped receipt showing he was eating at Penguin’s Steakhouse at 9:47 PM — three hours away from UVU — which completely destroys the timeline of the Discord messages he allegedly sent that night. This is not the slam-dunk case they’ve been trying to sell the public. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

12,570 views • 1 month ago

‼️🇺🇸: DEFENSE REVEALS THAT GUN & SCREWDRIVER "DNA EVIDENCE" IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION IS MIXED FROM 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 👀 During the Tyler Robinson hearing on replacing the prosecution, prosecutors called a lead agent who claimed DNA evidence was from Tyler Robinson. HOWEVER the agent decided TO NOT MENTION that the DNA evidence they collected was a mixture of 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE'S DNA. What is going on here!? 🤨

‼️🇺🇸: DEFENSE REVEALS THAT GUN & SCREWDRIVER "DNA EVIDENCE" IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION IS MIXED FROM 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 👀 During the Tyler Robinson hearing on replacing the prosecution, prosecutors called a lead agent who claimed DNA evidence was from Tyler Robinson. HOWEVER the agent decided TO NOT MENTION that the DNA evidence they collected was a mixture of 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE'S DNA. What is going on here!? 🤨

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

741,747 views • 7 months ago

🚨Attorney Andrea Burkhart dismantles Candace Owens' claim that DNA degradation on Tyler Robinson’s rifle proves someone else handled it after him: “What you cannot infer from the fact of DNA degradation is what it means, how it happened, why it happened, or whether the DNA was already degraded before it was deposited, which can happen with certain skin cells that are already degraded.” Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️: “As we heard in the preliminary hearing, the DOJ analysts are not allowed to testify in court about any opinions related to the timing of samples being deposited.” “It absolutely doesn’t tell you when it was deposited.” “That would be a very unscientific claim.” How many people have been claiming the degraded DNA proves someone else touched the rifle after Robinson? I even heard Adam 🆘 Sosnick cite this to Patrick Bet-David as one of Candace’s stronger points. But Candace is misunderstanding what DNA degradation actually tells us and drawing a conclusion that the forensic evidence does not support. Send them this.

🚨Attorney Andrea Burkhart dismantles Candace Owens' claim that DNA degradation on Tyler Robinson’s rifle proves someone else handled it after him: “What you cannot infer from the fact of DNA degradation is what it means, how it happened, why it happened, or whether the DNA was already degraded before it was deposited, which can happen with certain skin cells that are already degraded.” Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️: “As we heard in the preliminary hearing, the DOJ analysts are not allowed to testify in court about any opinions related to the timing of samples being deposited.” “It absolutely doesn’t tell you when it was deposited.” “That would be a very unscientific claim.” How many people have been claiming the degraded DNA proves someone else touched the rifle after Robinson? I even heard Adam 🆘 Sosnick cite this to Patrick Bet-David as one of Candace’s stronger points. But Candace is misunderstanding what DNA degradation actually tells us and drawing a conclusion that the forensic evidence does not support. Send them this.

KanekoaTheGreat

111,221 views • 13 days ago

Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate Lance Twiggs "Use Immunity" testimony. Andrew Wilson says these interviews are some of the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson. Candace Owens is fact checked about Tyler Robinson texting Lance Twiggs about being seen on campus security footage. She then points out that even Lance Twiggs doesn't fully believe it is Tyler Robinson in the footagem The two also debate what testimony is hearsay and if it is reasonable to assume Tyler Robinson was the shooter based on the State's narrative. Thoughts?

Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate Lance Twiggs "Use Immunity" testimony. Andrew Wilson says these interviews are some of the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson. Candace Owens is fact checked about Tyler Robinson texting Lance Twiggs about being seen on campus security footage. She then points out that even Lance Twiggs doesn't fully believe it is Tyler Robinson in the footagem The two also debate what testimony is hearsay and if it is reasonable to assume Tyler Robinson was the shooter based on the State's narrative. Thoughts?

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

31,541 views • 20 days ago

All of the evidence together proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. Video shows Tyler firing the weapon, the gun was recovered with his DNA, his family confirmed it belonged to him, and he admitted to the shooting. The evidence speaks for itself. Cases do not get much clearer than this. Open and shut.

All of the evidence together proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. Video shows Tyler firing the weapon, the gun was recovered with his DNA, his family confirmed it belonged to him, and he admitted to the shooting. The evidence speaks for itself. Cases do not get much clearer than this. Open and shut.

Brandon Tatum

70,831 views • 4 months ago

Candace Owens acts like anybody who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty is basing it solely only on the text message chain with Lance Twiggs. Yet she neglects to mention the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson: Robinson's DNA linking him to Charlie's murder. "DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel," according to the official Utah County charging document. If DNA evidence means nothing, then our entire system of justice in our country when it comes to homicide is...what? Completely fraudulent? Of course not.

Candace Owens acts like anybody who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty is basing it solely only on the text message chain with Lance Twiggs. Yet she neglects to mention the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson: Robinson's DNA linking him to Charlie's murder. "DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel," according to the official Utah County charging document. If DNA evidence means nothing, then our entire system of justice in our country when it comes to homicide is...what? Completely fraudulent? Of course not.

Liz Wheeler

279,702 views • 8 months ago

New testimony is shedding more light on the case surrounding Charlie Kirk's killing. During a five-day preliminary hearing in Utah, accused assassin Tyler Robinson's former roommate and former lover testified that Robinson confessed to killing Kirk and had been engraving bullets for up to a month before the shooting. Prosecutors also unveiled the rifle investigators believe was used in the attack. Experts testified that DNA linked to Robinson was found on the firearm, while the defense argued the evidence does not conclusively tie the weapon to the killing. Matt Finn breaks down the key moments from court.

New testimony is shedding more light on the case surrounding Charlie Kirk's killing. During a five-day preliminary hearing in Utah, accused assassin Tyler Robinson's former roommate and former lover testified that Robinson confessed to killing Kirk and had been engraving bullets for up to a month before the shooting. Prosecutors also unveiled the rifle investigators believe was used in the attack. Experts testified that DNA linked to Robinson was found on the firearm, while the defense argued the evidence does not conclusively tie the weapon to the killing. Matt Finn breaks down the key moments from court.

Fox News

121,382 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 views • 5 months ago

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.

Brian Allen

172,400 views • 4 months ago

🚨THREAD: Was Candace Owens’ “Inside Source” Joe Kent? Here’s what we know.... Candace Owens said on Sept. 30, 2025, that she had been contacted the week prior by a “source” with inside information on the Charlie Kirk investigation. From mid-September through October, Owens appeared to share information that would typically only be accessible to someone close to the investigation - including photos from inside the car Kirk was taken to the hospital in, details of Tyler Robinson’s movements on the day of Kirk’s death, alleged ballistic information, and the FBI’s investigative strategy. Was Joe Kent Owens’ “source on the inside”? Let’s break down the timeline....

🚨THREAD: Was Candace Owens’ “Inside Source” Joe Kent? Here’s what we know.... Candace Owens said on Sept. 30, 2025, that she had been contacted the week prior by a “source” with inside information on the Charlie Kirk investigation. From mid-September through October, Owens appeared to share information that would typically only be accessible to someone close to the investigation - including photos from inside the car Kirk was taken to the hospital in, details of Tyler Robinson’s movements on the day of Kirk’s death, alleged ballistic information, and the FBI’s investigative strategy. Was Joe Kent Owens’ “source on the inside”? Let’s break down the timeline....

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

85,513 views • 5 months ago

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens DESTROYS Benny Johnson for LYING About the Tyler Robinson Prelim Video😱 Candace Owens came back swinging tonight and directly called out Benny Johnson for lying about the video shown in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Benny claimed that Exhibit 12.1 was high-definition 4K footage that clearly showed Tyler Robinson taking the shot and even revealed the license plate on his Charger. Candace broke it down and explained that 12.1 is simply an enhanced and zoomed-in version of footage that was already played on Day 2 (Exhibit 12.4). She pointed out that even with the zooming and red circles, the video still does not clearly show anyone taking the shot. The person on the roof remains a blurry pixel, and there is no clear identification. She called this coordinated push a psychological operation and said influencers were given a script to convince the public that overwhelming evidence was shown in court. Candace made it clear she’s not backing down and won’t sit back while people betray Charlie Kirk for access and money. This is a war for your mind. And Candace just made it known she’s ready for it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇 CC: Benny Johnson

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens DESTROYS Benny Johnson for LYING About the Tyler Robinson Prelim Video😱 Candace Owens came back swinging tonight and directly called out Benny Johnson for lying about the video shown in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Benny claimed that Exhibit 12.1 was high-definition 4K footage that clearly showed Tyler Robinson taking the shot and even revealed the license plate on his Charger. Candace broke it down and explained that 12.1 is simply an enhanced and zoomed-in version of footage that was already played on Day 2 (Exhibit 12.4). She pointed out that even with the zooming and red circles, the video still does not clearly show anyone taking the shot. The person on the roof remains a blurry pixel, and there is no clear identification. She called this coordinated push a psychological operation and said influencers were given a script to convince the public that overwhelming evidence was shown in court. Candace made it clear she’s not backing down and won’t sit back while people betray Charlie Kirk for access and money. This is a war for your mind. And Candace just made it known she’s ready for it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇 CC: Benny Johnson

Project Constitution

47,230 views • 1 month ago