Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Charlie kirk vs basic biology💀😅

122,260 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

36 Comments

Ryan's profile picture
Ryan5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 I didn't even like Kirk, so I watch these hoping he gets dunked on, but it's always retarded "science bros" and libtards, lol.

么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,'s profile picture
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,5 months ago

We know who you’re🤭

Chromatix's profile picture
Chromatix5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 i thought people from Cambridge were supposed to be of some of the most intelligent people?

Green-Pilled's profile picture
Green-Pilled5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 A good message COMPLETELY RUINED by unnecessary video and audio laid on top! WTF?!

Jag's profile picture
Jag5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Love all the MAGA idiots defending their community college drop out. The guy was a dildo who liked to debate college freshman.

Alexander's profile picture
Alexander5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 The Cambridge guy forgets that when they fuse together they get their unique DNA, which is a mix of the 2 parents. That’s the new DNA. That’s like saying Coca Cola isn’t a unique drink because it’s just water with some ingredients.

Dusk Sentry's profile picture
Dusk Sentry5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Fucking master of debates over here countering a paragraph long speech on the beauty of scientifically accurate conception with "but- but we call it the miracle of life 🤡"

Tom's profile picture
Tom5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 These two are so close together that any little discrepancy is blown out of all proportion by people who hate CK. It's sad.

Ranty's profile picture
Ranty5 months ago

@kaizen000000000

elliot's profile picture
elliot5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 You could use the same argument for the mother and father then… Murder should be legal? he thought he did something.

The Daily Squire's profile picture
The Daily Squire5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 "DNA is not created" Failed biology right out of the gate. That's what sexual reproduction is.

Tony Soprano's profile picture
Tony Soprano5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 There is no actual argument , yes dna wast created. so that makes it ok to kill a soon to be conscious separate human being?

Zedd's profile picture
Zedd5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 It makes me sad to think about how many people think Charlie wasn’t an idiot.

Ali's profile picture
Ali5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 he is wrong. each person has a unique dna code. we are not just dna from mom and dad there is crossing over and randomization that occurs. there is mixing

finn the boy's profile picture
finn the boy5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 I can’t lie, this “gene” forming in a scientific way is crazy enough on its own, the whole world is ran by a very systematic process. Charlie follows Christianity which makes it funny cuz that religion is not logical, the other kid is as stupid saying that “we know”.We don’t know

Stephen Gunnell 🇺🇸's profile picture
Stephen Gunnell 🇺🇸5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 This is a bit short of a full video - the dna is produced because half comes from mom and half from dad. Those combinations can be infinite and depend on what fertilizes what egg. There are different combinations that would occur and each new conception is unique dna

Doctor Dieyoung's profile picture
Doctor Dieyoung5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Meriam Webster estimates there to be a million words in English. According to same logic, because the basic elements for every book and poem, every sentence, already exist, nothing unique and worthwhile is being created. Perhaps that makes sense why it's a poor argument?

X's profile picture
X5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 The fusion of DNA is, in itself, the creation of new DNA. By his logic, nothing could ever truly be created, since the underlying materials have always existed in some form.

Aaron Calasanz Sallen's profile picture
Aaron Calasanz Sallen5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Just because you put a music doesn’t prove anything, he said that dna it’s not creates because it comes from father and mother, then we humans don’t create anything because we only make things from preexisting ones

Vladimir da III's profile picture
Vladimir da III5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Bro said DNA can’t be created then literally goes on to explain how the fuck the DNA gets created Liberals are the stupidest people ever I can’t believe they think what this guy is saying us correct

wastingfreeagency123's profile picture
wastingfreeagency1235 months ago

@kaizen000000000 The guy completely misrepresents Charlie’s point and doesn’t know basic language. Yes the dna comes from existing dna, but when it is mixed together it is new dna. The dna created is an entirely new genome that’s never existed before.

happyness29's profile picture
happyness295 months ago

@kaizen000000000 If all humans are a clump of cells like he says when does that clump of cells become human? By his logic you can perform post birth abortions after all a baby is a clump of cells. I don't see how the student even made a substantive argument that abortion is moral.

FraserMacHQ's profile picture
FraserMacHQ5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 It’s amazing how they cut it off at the moment of Charlie making a point you should watch the whole thing

Dominic Morgan's profile picture
Dominic Morgan5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 This begs the question: so where does the first dna come from?

B's profile picture
B5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 This isn’t the flex you think it is. At conception, a new “thing” has been created that has never existed before and will never exist again. You just have to ask yourself what that “thing” is.

HouseOfHome's profile picture
HouseOfHome5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 How do you guys prove how retarded you are without trying?

exoreddragon13's profile picture
exoreddragon135 months ago

@kaizen000000000 This isn’t a dunk, lmao. He just being pedantic and arguing descriptors. Charlie obviously means the new DNA that is created by the conjoining of sperm and egg cells.

dingo's profile picture
dingo5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 @grok do you have the transcript of Charlie's reply that was cut off at the end of this video?

Irwin M Fletcher's profile picture
Irwin M Fletcher5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Charlie always won these. This one is no different. Maybe play the whole thing next time.

LookingForNews's profile picture
LookingForNews5 months ago

How do dna tests work then for say a murder suspect. You can test the dna to see who it matches to. Your dna doesn't come back as your mom's or your dad's. Its a mix of your parents a unique mix. One easy counter example is nylon earing bacteria nylon polymer didnt exist before 1930. The bacteria developed an an enzyme that never existed before that let's them breakdown and digest nylon polymer. Are you trying to say the dna info has always been in the bacteria to be able to digest the polymer that wasn't even invented till 1930s... that evolution my friend

The Outcast Crusader's profile picture
The Outcast Crusader5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 lol you lot always cut these videos so no one actually see them getting destroyed by Charlie.

Steven's profile picture
Steven5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Wrong, DNA is created, a new life is a new unique DnA sequence, and the new DnA is created from simpler molecules by existing DNA

Miguel A Diaz's profile picture
Miguel A Diaz5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 They agree 99.999999% and disagree 0.000001%.

Yeetus's profile picture
Yeetus5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Yea, life happens dumb fuck. Cambridge student not only sounds like a dumb fuck but he is also fucking stupid. Basic biology class bro……

jokkyjokz's profile picture
jokkyjokz5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 Am i stupid or serial killers can have the same argument?

William G. Michaels's profile picture
William G. Michaels5 months ago

@kaizen000000000 As an atheist, as someone who doesn’t believe in miracles, I understand the metaphor of “the miracle of life”. I will easily, willingly, happily, grant them that. Give them that. It’s theirs. We have no explanation. We need them strong. We need them forthright.

Related Videos