Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Checklists are where processes go to be remembered, not done. Mine had 10-12 steps for onboarding a new partner and still cost me 90+ minutes every close, plus one partner who slipped through anyway. I run a creator-led media business. A signed deal triggers invisible work: folder, kickoff doc,...

sufyanmaan's profile picture

Sufyan Maan, M.Eng

27,530 subscribers

41,983 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

We wanted to know if Viktor could own a real job. Our first pilot reduced a five-client reporting workflow from 12 to 15 hours of manual work to roughly an hour of team review. We're a digital marketing team managing paid media performance and client reporting, so we decided to test Viktor on one recurring workflow that every agency knows too well. Weekly reporting. Viktor didn't just summarize data. He produced a complete five-page report with an executive summary, funnel insights, channel performance, recommendations, and a final review checklist. Our team's job became reviewing and approving the work instead of building every report from scratch. That was the moment we stopped thinking about AI as another chat window. The real value wasn't getting better answers. It was handing off a recurring job and getting consistent work back every week while keeping our team in control of the final decision. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does it. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #FutureOfWork Paid Partnership.
0:47

We wanted to know if Viktor could own a real job. Our first pilot reduced a five-client reporting workflow from 12 to 15 hours of manual work to roughly an hour of team review. We're a digital marketing team managing paid media performance and client reporting, so we decided to test Viktor on one recurring workflow that every agency knows too well. Weekly reporting. Viktor didn't just summarize data. He produced a complete five-page report with an executive summary, funnel insights, channel performance, recommendations, and a final review checklist. Our team's job became reviewing and approving the work instead of building every report from scratch. That was the moment we stopped thinking about AI as another chat window. The real value wasn't getting better answers. It was handing off a recurring job and getting consistent work back every week while keeping our team in control of the final decision. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does it. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #FutureOfWork Paid Partnership.

Sean Wallace

51,510 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Our team was spending around 6+ hours every week figuring out where projects actually stood. The work wasn't the problem. Finding the latest context was. I run a team where multiple projects move at the same time, so keeping everyone aligned used to mean checking dozens of Slack conversations every day. That worked for a while. Until it didn't. The turning point wasn't asking Viktor better questions. It was giving him one recurring responsibility. Stay on top of every active project. Now he keeps track of progress, highlights anything that's stalled, prepares updates before meetings, and gives the team one place to review what actually needs attention. Nobody has to chase information anymore. The work is already organized before we start. That one change probably saved more time than any prompt I've ever written. A copilot helps you work. An AI employee works when you don't. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #Operations Paid Partnership.
0:21

Our team was spending around 6+ hours every week figuring out where projects actually stood. The work wasn't the problem. Finding the latest context was. I run a team where multiple projects move at the same time, so keeping everyone aligned used to mean checking dozens of Slack conversations every day. That worked for a while. Until it didn't. The turning point wasn't asking Viktor better questions. It was giving him one recurring responsibility. Stay on top of every active project. Now he keeps track of progress, highlights anything that's stalled, prepares updates before meetings, and gives the team one place to review what actually needs attention. Nobody has to chase information anymore. The work is already organized before we start. That one change probably saved more time than any prompt I've ever written. A copilot helps you work. An AI employee works when you don't. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #Operations Paid Partnership.

Kaitee

59,483 просмотров • 10 дней назад

An agency added $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in its first 30 days. No new hires. No new service line. That number made me stop scrolling. I spend a lot of time researching AI tools. The biggest time sink isn't testing them. It's comparing features, checking updates, and turning scattered information into something useful. So I tried Viktor Viktor is an AI employee that works inside Slack. I asked it to research the latest AI video generation tools, compare their features, pricing, and best use cases. Instead of starting from a blank page, I had a structured proposal waiting for review. I kept the final approval. Viktor handled the work. That reminded me of Nico Torres, Founder of Authority Makers. His team used Viktor to run work that simply wasn't getting done before, adding $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in the first 30 days without adding headcount. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does the work. Try free at Viktor. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in the first comment. #AIemployee #AITools #Productivity Paid Partnership
0:26

An agency added $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in its first 30 days. No new hires. No new service line. That number made me stop scrolling. I spend a lot of time researching AI tools. The biggest time sink isn't testing them. It's comparing features, checking updates, and turning scattered information into something useful. So I tried Viktor Viktor is an AI employee that works inside Slack. I asked it to research the latest AI video generation tools, compare their features, pricing, and best use cases. Instead of starting from a blank page, I had a structured proposal waiting for review. I kept the final approval. Viktor handled the work. That reminded me of Nico Torres, Founder of Authority Makers. His team used Viktor to run work that simply wasn't getting done before, adding $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in the first 30 days without adding headcount. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does the work. Try free at Viktor. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in the first comment. #AIemployee #AITools #Productivity Paid Partnership

Sam brown

45,687 просмотров • 4 дней назад

18-year-old American found a roofing company on Google Maps with 4.9 stars and no website, copied their reviews and pasted them into ChatGPT 5.5. 2 minutes later - a complete brief. Pasted it into AI and just waited while the system built a full website with all pages, reviews and a booking button. Called the owner and showed him the live preview. He said yes immediately because he'd been meaning to fix this for years and never had the time. Invoice for $1,000. 47 minutes of work from the first search to a closed deal. Then he built a machine. AI pulls 200 businesses from Google Maps in 10 minutes, writes a personalized email for each one with their real business data - 500 emails a day, 3% respond. Month one - $4,000, month six - $15,000-20,000. Five million businesses on Google Maps are still waiting for that call.
0:47

18-year-old American found a roofing company on Google Maps with 4.9 stars and no website, copied their reviews and pasted them into ChatGPT 5.5. 2 minutes later - a complete brief. Pasted it into AI and just waited while the system built a full website with all pages, reviews and a booking button. Called the owner and showed him the live preview. He said yes immediately because he'd been meaning to fix this for years and never had the time. Invoice for $1,000. 47 minutes of work from the first search to a closed deal. Then he built a machine. AI pulls 200 businesses from Google Maps in 10 minutes, writes a personalized email for each one with their real business data - 500 emails a day, 3% respond. Month one - $4,000, month six - $15,000-20,000. Five million businesses on Google Maps are still waiting for that call.

Rahul

7,547,884 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The first campaign Viktor reviewed caught problems we didn't even know were there. We're a digital marketing team managing campaigns across multiple ad platforms, and before every launch someone on the team would manually check tracking, landing pages, targeting, budgets, creatives, and campaign settings. It was repetitive work, but missing just one detail could turn into wasted budget or inaccurate reporting. Instead of asking Viktor to help with individual checks, we gave him ownership of our entire campaign launch QA workflow. The first thing that stood out wasn't how quickly he worked. It was how thorough he was. Across one month, Viktor completed QA for 30 campaigns, executed 330 automated checks, and identified 47 issues, including 14 critical errors that could have affected campaign performance before a single campaign went live. By the time our team stepped in, all that was left was reviewing his findings and approving the launch. That completely changed the way we approached campaign launches. Instead of spending 65 hours every month on manual QA, our workflow was reduced to just 10.5 hours of strategic review giving our team back an estimated 54.5 hours to focus on optimization instead of repetitive checks. The biggest takeaway wasn't the time we saved. It was knowing every campaign went through the same level of quality control before launch. That's the difference we've started seeing between an AI assistant and an AI employee. An assistant waits for prompts. An AI employee owns recurring work while your team focuses on the decisions that matter most. Every campaign your team launches without this is a risk someone on your team is quietly absorbing. A copilot helps you work. An AI employee works when you don't. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #MarketingOps #DigitalMarketing Paid Partnership
0:58

The first campaign Viktor reviewed caught problems we didn't even know were there. We're a digital marketing team managing campaigns across multiple ad platforms, and before every launch someone on the team would manually check tracking, landing pages, targeting, budgets, creatives, and campaign settings. It was repetitive work, but missing just one detail could turn into wasted budget or inaccurate reporting. Instead of asking Viktor to help with individual checks, we gave him ownership of our entire campaign launch QA workflow. The first thing that stood out wasn't how quickly he worked. It was how thorough he was. Across one month, Viktor completed QA for 30 campaigns, executed 330 automated checks, and identified 47 issues, including 14 critical errors that could have affected campaign performance before a single campaign went live. By the time our team stepped in, all that was left was reviewing his findings and approving the launch. That completely changed the way we approached campaign launches. Instead of spending 65 hours every month on manual QA, our workflow was reduced to just 10.5 hours of strategic review giving our team back an estimated 54.5 hours to focus on optimization instead of repetitive checks. The biggest takeaway wasn't the time we saved. It was knowing every campaign went through the same level of quality control before launch. That's the difference we've started seeing between an AI assistant and an AI employee. An assistant waits for prompts. An AI employee owns recurring work while your team focuses on the decisions that matter most. Every campaign your team launches without this is a risk someone on your team is quietly absorbing. A copilot helps you work. An AI employee works when you don't. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #MarketingOps #DigitalMarketing Paid Partnership

Kylie

92,501 просмотров • 24 дней назад

If I had to start from zero tomorrow and bring in new customers fast, here's exactly what I'd build. Top to bottom. I'd start with the ad. Open ChatGPT or Claude, paste in what you sell and who you sell it to, ask it to write you ten different hooks for a Meta ad. Pick the best three. Then jump into or one of the AI video tools and have it generate the visual. Thirty minutes, you've got a real ad ready to run. You run that ad to one landing page. Not your homepage. One page, one offer, one call to action. Headline that stops the scroll, a few lines of value, an email or phone field, a button. That's it. Build it in HighLevel in about twenty minutes, drag, drop, you're done. The second someone enters their email, they drop into your CRM, automatically tagged with where they came from. Now the part most people skip, the follow-up. The moment that form is filled, a sequence kicks off automatically. Email and SMS, spaced over five to seven days. First message thanks them and delivers what you promised. Then a story. Then social proof. Then an objection you know they have. Then the offer. They don't have to think about you. You're showing up in their inbox and their texts at exactly the right time. The last message has a calendar link or a buy button right inside it. They tap, they book, or they buy. Done. The whole flow runs on its own from the ad all the way to the sale. You build it once. It works while you're sleeping. AI does the creative work. The system runs the customer journey. You spend your time on strategy. That's the play.
1:09

If I had to start from zero tomorrow and bring in new customers fast, here's exactly what I'd build. Top to bottom. I'd start with the ad. Open ChatGPT or Claude, paste in what you sell and who you sell it to, ask it to write you ten different hooks for a Meta ad. Pick the best three. Then jump into or one of the AI video tools and have it generate the visual. Thirty minutes, you've got a real ad ready to run. You run that ad to one landing page. Not your homepage. One page, one offer, one call to action. Headline that stops the scroll, a few lines of value, an email or phone field, a button. That's it. Build it in HighLevel in about twenty minutes, drag, drop, you're done. The second someone enters their email, they drop into your CRM, automatically tagged with where they came from. Now the part most people skip, the follow-up. The moment that form is filled, a sequence kicks off automatically. Email and SMS, spaced over five to seven days. First message thanks them and delivers what you promised. Then a story. Then social proof. Then an objection you know they have. Then the offer. They don't have to think about you. You're showing up in their inbox and their texts at exactly the right time. The last message has a calendar link or a buy button right inside it. They tap, they book, or they buy. Done. The whole flow runs on its own from the ad all the way to the sale. You build it once. It works while you're sleeping. AI does the creative work. The system runs the customer journey. You spend your time on strategy. That's the play.

Neil Patel

39,323 просмотров • 27 дней назад

An agency added $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in its first 30 days with Viktor. No new hires. No new service line. I spend most of my time testing AI tools for content and outbound work, so I don't say that lightly. Every team I talk to has the same problem. The strategy is fine. The relationships are fine. What's missing is capacity, the high-value work sitting on the backlog because nobody has the hours to own it. I've watched teams try to fix that by hiring, or by bolting on another tool that just answers questions and calls it done. Then I read what happened at Authority Makers. Nico Torres, the founder, didn't hire and didn't add a service line. He gave Viktor the outbound and lead gen work that had been sitting untouched. $133,752 in new ARR in the first 30 days. Same team, same strategy. The only thing that changed was who was doing the work. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does it. Tell me I'm wrong. Try free at Viktor. $100 in credits, no card. Full link in my first reply. Paid Partnership
1:02

An agency added $133,752 in new annual recurring revenue in its first 30 days with Viktor. No new hires. No new service line. I spend most of my time testing AI tools for content and outbound work, so I don't say that lightly. Every team I talk to has the same problem. The strategy is fine. The relationships are fine. What's missing is capacity, the high-value work sitting on the backlog because nobody has the hours to own it. I've watched teams try to fix that by hiring, or by bolting on another tool that just answers questions and calls it done. Then I read what happened at Authority Makers. Nico Torres, the founder, didn't hire and didn't add a service line. He gave Viktor the outbound and lead gen work that had been sitting untouched. $133,752 in new ARR in the first 30 days. Same team, same strategy. The only thing that changed was who was doing the work. Most AI tells you what to do. Viktor does it. Tell me I'm wrong. Try free at Viktor. $100 in credits, no card. Full link in my first reply. Paid Partnership

Alex Moore

31,672 просмотров • 27 дней назад

There are 8 billion people on earth. Soon there'll be 100 billion AI agents. Every one of them needs email. Six weeks ago I said the next wave of teams would run email through an agent instead of a dashboard. Today it ships. Nitrosend☄️ is launching Agentic Email Marketing: the email layer for the agent economy. What agents can do on Nitrosend right now: Sign themselves up. Point any agent at and it creates the account, connects your domain, sorts billing and sends its first email. No API key. No dashboard. No human required. Shipped, and users agents signing up with it daily. Get their own inboxes (beta, by request). Real addresses on the domain you own. Your agents receive, and send 1-1 email conversations with customers. A reply lands at 3am, your agent answers it. Anything that needs a human gets escalated to you. Ask us and we'll flick yours on. Next: Agentic Outreach (coming soon). Your agent studies your best customers, finds more like them, writes like a person, sends in sequence and works the replies. Then: set a goal and walk away. Goal-based agentic marketing is in development. "20% more activations this quarter" and Nitrosend plans, sends, measures and improves every week. Why we built this: Gmail is agent hostile and expensive per seat. Legacy email platforms assume a human sitting in a dashboard. agents needed an email layer of their own. They're already better at it than we are. They read everything, never miss a follow-up, and write personally at any scale. *94%* of actions on Nitrosend already happen inside an agent (Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, Cursor), not in our UI. Humans approve. Agents operate. This is our third email company. Six billion emails across the first two. We've been burned by every ugly part of email already, which is why the approval gates are built in exactly where you want them. Watch the launch, then send your agent to work: send it.
1:13

There are 8 billion people on earth. Soon there'll be 100 billion AI agents. Every one of them needs email. Six weeks ago I said the next wave of teams would run email through an agent instead of a dashboard. Today it ships. Nitrosend☄️ is launching Agentic Email Marketing: the email layer for the agent economy. What agents can do on Nitrosend right now: Sign themselves up. Point any agent at and it creates the account, connects your domain, sorts billing and sends its first email. No API key. No dashboard. No human required. Shipped, and users agents signing up with it daily. Get their own inboxes (beta, by request). Real addresses on the domain you own. Your agents receive, and send 1-1 email conversations with customers. A reply lands at 3am, your agent answers it. Anything that needs a human gets escalated to you. Ask us and we'll flick yours on. Next: Agentic Outreach (coming soon). Your agent studies your best customers, finds more like them, writes like a person, sends in sequence and works the replies. Then: set a goal and walk away. Goal-based agentic marketing is in development. "20% more activations this quarter" and Nitrosend plans, sends, measures and improves every week. Why we built this: Gmail is agent hostile and expensive per seat. Legacy email platforms assume a human sitting in a dashboard. agents needed an email layer of their own. They're already better at it than we are. They read everything, never miss a follow-up, and write personally at any scale. *94%* of actions on Nitrosend already happen inside an agent (Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, Cursor), not in our UI. Humans approve. Agents operate. This is our third email company. Six billion emails across the first two. We've been burned by every ugly part of email already, which is why the approval gates are built in exactly where you want them. Watch the launch, then send your agent to work: send it.

George Hartley ☄️

931,971 просмотров • 29 дней назад

I built a Reddit marketing agent that gets your business mentioned by ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. Not a spam bot. Not the kind that gets banned by mods. An agent that drafts genuinely valuable answers grounded in your company's actual content and slips in a brand mention only when it actually helps. Google is paying Reddit $60M a year just for their data!!! If your business isn't showing up in that data, your competitors are, and ChatGPT is recommending them instead of you. Here's how the system works: → A Claude routine pulls the target subreddit's JSON endpoint every hour for new posts → A Phase 1 checklist filters every post — is it answerable from our wiki, factual, on-brand, mod-safe? → The answer engine queries an LLM Wiki built from our blog, guides, and help center (Firecrawl ingested every page into a raw → wiki → index structure) → Claude drafts a casual, value-first answer that grounds every claim in our content → Every draft lands in Slack for human-in-the-loop review before it posts — no fire-and-forget, no bans I built this in a week for CoinLedger, the crypto tax software I've been running for 8 years. 10% of our new signups already say they found us through ChatGPT. This system is how we push that number a lot higher. If you want the exact Claude skill I built: Like & Comment "AGENT" (must be following so I can dm you) I'll send it over for free.
9:54

I built a Reddit marketing agent that gets your business mentioned by ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. Not a spam bot. Not the kind that gets banned by mods. An agent that drafts genuinely valuable answers grounded in your company's actual content and slips in a brand mention only when it actually helps. Google is paying Reddit $60M a year just for their data!!! If your business isn't showing up in that data, your competitors are, and ChatGPT is recommending them instead of you. Here's how the system works: → A Claude routine pulls the target subreddit's JSON endpoint every hour for new posts → A Phase 1 checklist filters every post — is it answerable from our wiki, factual, on-brand, mod-safe? → The answer engine queries an LLM Wiki built from our blog, guides, and help center (Firecrawl ingested every page into a raw → wiki → index structure) → Claude drafts a casual, value-first answer that grounds every claim in our content → Every draft lands in Slack for human-in-the-loop review before it posts — no fire-and-forget, no bans I built this in a week for CoinLedger, the crypto tax software I've been running for 8 years. 10% of our new signups already say they found us through ChatGPT. This system is how we push that number a lot higher. If you want the exact Claude skill I built: Like & Comment "AGENT" (must be following so I can dm you) I'll send it over for free.

David Roberts

36,293 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BREAKING! Introducing Plus One: A hosted OpenClaw🦞 that lives in your Slack and comes pre-loaded with Every 📧's best tools, skills, and workflows. Set it up in one click, and use your ChatGPT subscription (or any other API key.) Bring your Plus One to work: Connected to the Every 📧 ecosystem Plus Ones automatically use Every 📧's agent-native apps, no setup required: - Cora for searching, sending, and managing email - Spiral for great writing in your voice - Proof ( for agent-native document editing Custom skills and workflows we use and love Plus Ones come pre-loaded with skills and workflows we use ourselves Every 📧 —some we've made, and some we think are great. - Content digest—summarizes the publications you read, starting with Every 📧 - Daily brief—your day's schedule and to-dos sent to you each morning - Animate—turn any static screenshot into an animation with Remotion - Frontend—Anthropic's front-end skill (which we use all the time!) We also make it fast to connect Google, Notion, Github, and more to your Plus One. Our goal is to give you a capable AI coworker right away, not a vanilla OpenClaw that you have to teach from scratch. Why we built Plus One OpenClaw🦞 has changed the way we work at Every. We effectively have a parallel org chart of AI coworkers, each with a name, a manager, and real responsibilities. Because of them our workflows are completely different—our company is different—and we would never go back. But getting here has been hard. Claws require a significant amount of manual setup and require a dedicated machine—like a Mac Mini—running 24/7 to stay responsive. We have learned that the hard part of Claws is the infrastructure around them—the hosting, the integrations, the skills, and the ongoing care. We’ve made them work great for our team, and we want to share everything we’ve learned with you. We're letting in 20 people a week to start, and scaling invites quickly from there. Every 📧 subscribers get priority. Bring your Plus One to work:
0:56

BREAKING! Introducing Plus One: A hosted OpenClaw🦞 that lives in your Slack and comes pre-loaded with Every 📧's best tools, skills, and workflows. Set it up in one click, and use your ChatGPT subscription (or any other API key.) Bring your Plus One to work: Connected to the Every 📧 ecosystem Plus Ones automatically use Every 📧's agent-native apps, no setup required: - Cora for searching, sending, and managing email - Spiral for great writing in your voice - Proof ( for agent-native document editing Custom skills and workflows we use and love Plus Ones come pre-loaded with skills and workflows we use ourselves Every 📧 —some we've made, and some we think are great. - Content digest—summarizes the publications you read, starting with Every 📧 - Daily brief—your day's schedule and to-dos sent to you each morning - Animate—turn any static screenshot into an animation with Remotion - Frontend—Anthropic's front-end skill (which we use all the time!) We also make it fast to connect Google, Notion, Github, and more to your Plus One. Our goal is to give you a capable AI coworker right away, not a vanilla OpenClaw that you have to teach from scratch. Why we built Plus One OpenClaw🦞 has changed the way we work at Every. We effectively have a parallel org chart of AI coworkers, each with a name, a manager, and real responsibilities. Because of them our workflows are completely different—our company is different—and we would never go back. But getting here has been hard. Claws require a significant amount of manual setup and require a dedicated machine—like a Mac Mini—running 24/7 to stay responsive. We have learned that the hard part of Claws is the infrastructure around them—the hosting, the integrations, the skills, and the ongoing care. We’ve made them work great for our team, and we want to share everything we’ve learned with you. We're letting in 20 people a week to start, and scaling invites quickly from there. Every 📧 subscribers get priority. Bring your Plus One to work:

Dan Shipper 📧

260,028 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I'm making over $1,000 an hour with one AI offer. The entire thing runs on Claude Opus 4.8. I call it the AI Concierge. Clients pay me $1,500+ a month for two 45-minute calls where we build their AI systems live, on their screen. I have 4 clients. I'm capping at 6. Here's the entire model: 1) The intake form is the audit. A 10-minute JotForm (built by Claude) surfaces their time sinks and hands me 1-3 AI opportunities before call one. 2) Done-with-you, not done-for-you. They share their screen. We build skills, set up Cowork, and write context files together. They learn to drive. (Done-for-you is the upsell.) 3) Every session runs through AOA: Audit, Optimize, Automate. Fix the process first, then turn it into a skill. Automating chaos just gives you faster chaos. 4) Day one has to move the needle. We ship at least one skill or automation on call one. No first-call win, dead engagement. 5) Unlimited Voxer between calls. They send a voice message, I reply in under 12 business hours. A 24/7 partner, not a guy they see twice a month. 6) The Notion hub is the renewal mechanism. Every call logs a quantified list of what we built. "Call one: 2 skills, 3 context files, Cowork live" makes $1.5K a month a no-brainer. 7) I never fill Notion out by hand. Two Claude skills log the call, pull the action items, and draft the recap email. 30 seconds. 8) Pricing ladder: $1,000/month, then $1,500 at 2 clients, then $1,800. At $1,500 you're already at $1,000/hour. If everyone says yes then you're priced too low. Two things that make this work: 1) Build the fulfillment infrastructure once. An afternoon. Then it runs itself outside the calls. 2) The value must be visible. People renew what they can measure. Full breakdown below. Go watch.
15:21

I'm making over $1,000 an hour with one AI offer. The entire thing runs on Claude Opus 4.8. I call it the AI Concierge. Clients pay me $1,500+ a month for two 45-minute calls where we build their AI systems live, on their screen. I have 4 clients. I'm capping at 6. Here's the entire model: 1) The intake form is the audit. A 10-minute JotForm (built by Claude) surfaces their time sinks and hands me 1-3 AI opportunities before call one. 2) Done-with-you, not done-for-you. They share their screen. We build skills, set up Cowork, and write context files together. They learn to drive. (Done-for-you is the upsell.) 3) Every session runs through AOA: Audit, Optimize, Automate. Fix the process first, then turn it into a skill. Automating chaos just gives you faster chaos. 4) Day one has to move the needle. We ship at least one skill or automation on call one. No first-call win, dead engagement. 5) Unlimited Voxer between calls. They send a voice message, I reply in under 12 business hours. A 24/7 partner, not a guy they see twice a month. 6) The Notion hub is the renewal mechanism. Every call logs a quantified list of what we built. "Call one: 2 skills, 3 context files, Cowork live" makes $1.5K a month a no-brainer. 7) I never fill Notion out by hand. Two Claude skills log the call, pull the action items, and draft the recap email. 30 seconds. 8) Pricing ladder: $1,000/month, then $1,500 at 2 clients, then $1,800. At $1,500 you're already at $1,000/hour. If everyone says yes then you're priced too low. Two things that make this work: 1) Build the fulfillment infrastructure once. An afternoon. Then it runs itself outside the calls. 2) The value must be visible. People renew what they can measure. Full breakdown below. Go watch.

Corey Ganim

104,244 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

An agency added $133,752 in new ARR in 30 days. No new hires. Just work that wasn't getting done before. We run an AI-focused X account testing tools and workflows that actually save teams real time, not just add more steps. Most AI tools stop after giving you an answer. We wanted to see what happened when you gave one actual work to do. We added Viktor to our Slack workspace and connected him to our existing tools. Instead of bouncing between apps, we handed him work directly inside the workspace our team already uses. He started producing real outputs, not just suggestions. We asked him to summarize this week's AI news. He came back with a structured briefing: biggest stories, why they matter, key takeaways, and a thread-ready digest, all posted directly into Slack. It felt less like chatting with an AI and more like handing work to a teammate. We also ran a workflow that normally means switching between several apps and manually stitching everything together. Viktor handled it in the same place our team already collaborates. Reports, summaries, deliverables, done. That's what makes him different. The value isn't better answers. It's an AI employee who executes work that would otherwise sit on someone's to-do list. Nico Torres, Founder of Authority Makers, saw it in month one: $133,752 in new ARR from outbound work Viktor ran that previously had no one running it. Tell me I'm wrong, but this is what a non-human hire actually looks like in practice. Get started free at Viktor. $100 in credits included, no card. #AIemployee #AIWorkflows #ProductivityTools Paid Partnership
0:24

An agency added $133,752 in new ARR in 30 days. No new hires. Just work that wasn't getting done before. We run an AI-focused X account testing tools and workflows that actually save teams real time, not just add more steps. Most AI tools stop after giving you an answer. We wanted to see what happened when you gave one actual work to do. We added Viktor to our Slack workspace and connected him to our existing tools. Instead of bouncing between apps, we handed him work directly inside the workspace our team already uses. He started producing real outputs, not just suggestions. We asked him to summarize this week's AI news. He came back with a structured briefing: biggest stories, why they matter, key takeaways, and a thread-ready digest, all posted directly into Slack. It felt less like chatting with an AI and more like handing work to a teammate. We also ran a workflow that normally means switching between several apps and manually stitching everything together. Viktor handled it in the same place our team already collaborates. Reports, summaries, deliverables, done. That's what makes him different. The value isn't better answers. It's an AI employee who executes work that would otherwise sit on someone's to-do list. Nico Torres, Founder of Authority Makers, saw it in month one: $133,752 in new ARR from outbound work Viktor ran that previously had no one running it. Tell me I'm wrong, but this is what a non-human hire actually looks like in practice. Get started free at Viktor. $100 in credits included, no card. #AIemployee #AIWorkflows #ProductivityTools Paid Partnership

Farlane

101,043 просмотров • 27 дней назад

A life moment I will never forget. All I’ve had for two weeks is endless criticism from the establishment. But last night, we came back from a quiet dinner out and the news came through… Suicide of a Nation is not just in the Sunday Times bestseller list for the second week running. It is now the NUMBER ONE paperback in the country. I couldn’t believe it. Number one despite relentless attacks on me and my life’s work. Number one despite the fact that no one can seem to find the book in our high street book shops. The people have spoken. It’s time to engage in the debate about what is happening to our country. Now. I’m ready, I’m not afraid. I don’t care what they call me. But I am completely humbled by the support this book has received from the British people. They tried to cancel me, but the people didn’t let them. Can we keep Suicide Of A Nation in the list for four weeks in a row? Tell your family, tell your friends, tell your enemies (!) — let’s show the establishment we never give up. Onwards we go together.
0:38

A life moment I will never forget. All I’ve had for two weeks is endless criticism from the establishment. But last night, we came back from a quiet dinner out and the news came through… Suicide of a Nation is not just in the Sunday Times bestseller list for the second week running. It is now the NUMBER ONE paperback in the country. I couldn’t believe it. Number one despite relentless attacks on me and my life’s work. Number one despite the fact that no one can seem to find the book in our high street book shops. The people have spoken. It’s time to engage in the debate about what is happening to our country. Now. I’m ready, I’m not afraid. I don’t care what they call me. But I am completely humbled by the support this book has received from the British people. They tried to cancel me, but the people didn’t let them. Can we keep Suicide Of A Nation in the list for four weeks in a row? Tell your family, tell your friends, tell your enemies (!) — let’s show the establishment we never give up. Onwards we go together.

Matt Goodwin

220,445 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I was paying $500/month for 9 apps that made me feel productive without actually being productive! Notion. Roam. Evernote. Todoist. Bear. Readwise. Cron. Craft. Superhuman. Every one of them solved a real problem. Every one of them created a new one. Information scattered across nine places. Twenty minutes a day minimum switching between them. $500 leaving the account every month. Then everything moved into Obsidian. One app. Local files. No subscription. No sync issues. No data locked in a proprietary format. No "your account has been downgraded" email from an app that got acquired. That was 18 months ago. This is the exact vault setup. The folder structure. The templates. The plugins. The workflows. All of it. Free to take and adapt. $500 a month back in your pocket and everything in one place. Bookmark this gem so you do not lose it! Follow NeilXbt for more Obsidian and productivity builds..
2:31

I was paying $500/month for 9 apps that made me feel productive without actually being productive! Notion. Roam. Evernote. Todoist. Bear. Readwise. Cron. Craft. Superhuman. Every one of them solved a real problem. Every one of them created a new one. Information scattered across nine places. Twenty minutes a day minimum switching between them. $500 leaving the account every month. Then everything moved into Obsidian. One app. Local files. No subscription. No sync issues. No data locked in a proprietary format. No "your account has been downgraded" email from an app that got acquired. That was 18 months ago. This is the exact vault setup. The folder structure. The templates. The plugins. The workflows. All of it. Free to take and adapt. $500 a month back in your pocket and everything in one place. Bookmark this gem so you do not lose it! Follow NeilXbt for more Obsidian and productivity builds..

NeilXbt

25,865 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Do you know the pain of wanting to send a client an invoice, then you have to open your laptop, find your invoice document and start typing it in Or if you're one of those who use Canva for it You need an invoice and you need it in 3 minutes so you can close a deal I GOT YOU, I will show you how I made an invoice for my company using AI and then created a Webapp for it, the WebApp installs like an android app and I can open it and use anytime without internet. That's the next video Let me show you how I did my own P.S: It was my first time, so we do it together... Video dropping soon
2:36

Do you know the pain of wanting to send a client an invoice, then you have to open your laptop, find your invoice document and start typing it in Or if you're one of those who use Canva for it You need an invoice and you need it in 3 minutes so you can close a deal I GOT YOU, I will show you how I made an invoice for my company using AI and then created a Webapp for it, the WebApp installs like an android app and I can open it and use anytime without internet. That's the next video Let me show you how I did my own P.S: It was my first time, so we do it together... Video dropping soon

Richard U. | Web Developer

22,829 просмотров • 15 дней назад

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.
2:45

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

When travis kalanick was fundraising Uber's round that valued it at $70B, he ran four rooms simultaneously out of their New York office for an entire week, each booked in 90-minute slots across 12-hour days: "This is how we'd fundraise: we had four rooms in our New York office booked for a week with an hour-and-a-half slot on each. So for 12 hours in a day, four rooms going in parallel." "I'm in the $250M-and-over club, that's one room. Then there are these other rooms, down to the fourth room, which is like $25M checks. There's a guy who works for a guy, who works for a guy, who works for me who's doing that room." "But we're oversubscribed. So we started putting multiple investors in the same room. We were like, 'We're just out of slots dude. Let's go.'" "The storytelling we did, anybody on my team could tell that story and make it happen. And that was a big part. It was the story... then there is making it scalable so that there are 10 different people in a company that can pitch it at any given time. And that’s when you take it all the way."
3:13

When travis kalanick was fundraising Uber's round that valued it at $70B, he ran four rooms simultaneously out of their New York office for an entire week, each booked in 90-minute slots across 12-hour days: "This is how we'd fundraise: we had four rooms in our New York office booked for a week with an hour-and-a-half slot on each. So for 12 hours in a day, four rooms going in parallel." "I'm in the $250M-and-over club, that's one room. Then there are these other rooms, down to the fourth room, which is like $25M checks. There's a guy who works for a guy, who works for a guy, who works for me who's doing that room." "But we're oversubscribed. So we started putting multiple investors in the same room. We were like, 'We're just out of slots dude. Let's go.'" "The storytelling we did, anybody on my team could tell that story and make it happen. And that was a big part. It was the story... then there is making it scalable so that there are 10 different people in a company that can pitch it at any given time. And that’s when you take it all the way."

TBPN

239,554 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I set up Gemini Spark to write my own weekly AI news digest for me, and I'm still stuck on how little effort I had to put in. This is the exact prompt I gave it, just once: "Every Tuesday at 12:15 PM, create a new Doc in my Drive, find the 5 biggest AI stories from that week, and format each one properly." And here's what it actually produces, every week: 1. A new Doc, created and named on its own 2. The 5 biggest AI stories from that week, found and picked automatically 3. A bold headline and a summary for each one 4. The key impact spelled out, not just the news 5. A source link on every single story This runs on a schedule so I never have to think about it again. I didn't ask anything on Tuesday, I just opened the drive and the news digest doc was already there. Just like this, you can use Spark to automate any recurring task.
1:06

I set up Gemini Spark to write my own weekly AI news digest for me, and I'm still stuck on how little effort I had to put in. This is the exact prompt I gave it, just once: "Every Tuesday at 12:15 PM, create a new Doc in my Drive, find the 5 biggest AI stories from that week, and format each one properly." And here's what it actually produces, every week: 1. A new Doc, created and named on its own 2. The 5 biggest AI stories from that week, found and picked automatically 3. A bold headline and a summary for each one 4. The key impact spelled out, not just the news 5. A source link on every single story This runs on a schedule so I never have to think about it again. I didn't ask anything on Tuesday, I just opened the drive and the news digest doc was already there. Just like this, you can use Spark to automate any recurring task.

Eyisha Zyer

39,090 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.
0:58

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.

Dustin

506,895 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."
1:51

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

373,876 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад