Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

China doesn’t ask whether the mountains are too difficult to build through. It brings the machines and builds anyway. Across some of China’s most rugged terrain, massive engineering crews are carving high-speed rail routes through mountains and valleys, turning landscapes once considered natural barriers into connections between cities and...

115,507 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jim Heath
Jim Heathvor 5 Tagen

要想富, 先修路 If you want to be wealthy, build roads first. China spends hundreds of billions on roads, housing, power generation, and Internet, to bring the highest living standard in the world to 1.43B people.

Profilbild von Edwin
Edwinvor 5 Tagen

when building this kind of infrastructure becomes routine, hard terrain stops being an excuse.

Profilbild von Stiles Bitchley ☆☆
Stiles Bitchley ☆☆vor 5 Tagen

China do whatever is necessary to build the next largest construction disaster.

Profilbild von James Bamzy
James Bamzyvor 5 Tagen

A civilization with about 3000 yrs can never be fucked with… It shows our ancestors where top engineers. What China is doing now is not new, they could still tap into the memory of their ancestors and use it for modern development…

Profilbild von W
Wvor 5 Tagen

有好事者观之!

Profilbild von Marko
Markovor 5 Tagen

CHINESE PROPAGANDA CHANEL, just more CHINESE BULLSHIT

Profilbild von 愛猫-NENE
愛猫-NENEvor 5 Tagen

中国は自然破壊をし過ぎ 自然破壊の影響で災害が増えてる事を無知な中国国民は理解してない

Profilbild von Abhishek Sahu
Abhishek Sahuvor 5 Tagen

Crazy 🤪

Profilbild von 𝕵𝖔𝖘𝖊
𝕵𝖔𝖘𝖊vor 5 Tagen

It’s just back breaking fascism no Benefits health care coverage incase anything breaks or get sick on the job from being exposed to shit fuck that.

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk’s point about China is worth thinking about not because “China is peaceful,” but because China’s historical experience is fundamentally different from the Western imperial model we often use to interpret it. For much of its long history, China’s biggest wars were fought within China, not across oceans to build overseas colonies. Think about the scale of its history, the Three Kingdoms, the An Lushan Rebellion, the Mongol conquest, the Ming–Qing transition, the Taiping Rebellion, and countless periods of fragmentation and reunification. Some of these conflicts produced demographic catastrophes on a scale that is difficult to comprehend today. Elon frequently cited “70%” figure is debatable and shouldn’t be treated as a precise historical statistic. But the broader pattern is real, some of China’s bloodiest chapters were civil wars, rebellions and struggles over the reunification of the Chinese heartland. That matters because history shapes strategic culture. China is a continental civilisation with thousands of years of written history, repeatedly experiencing fragmentation, famine, invasion, reconstruction and reunification. Its strategic instinct has often been about maintaining internal cohesion, securing its borders and building economic strength. This doesn’t mean China has never expanded, fought neighbours or exercised imperial power, it absolutely has. And history is not destiny… But I think the mistake is assuming that China’s rise automatically follows the same trajectory as 19th-century European imperialism, overseas colonies, resource extraction and permanent expeditionary warfare. Look at what China has poured enormous resources into over the past few decades: high-speed rail, ports, manufacturing, cities, energy infrastructure, technology and industrial capacity. That tells us something, the question isn’t whether China is “good” or “bad”, the more useful question is what kind of superpower is China becoming? If we want to compete with China, collaborate with China, invest in China or simply understand China, we need to stop projecting our own historical experience onto it. You cannot understand a civilization with 5,000 years of history by viewing it through a 200-year-old Western lens.

Alvin Foo

325,653 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Norway’s fjords look like rivers cutting through the mountains. They’re actually valleys carved by glaciers and later flooded by the sea. Once you know that, the landscape starts to make a little more sense. During the ice ages, glaciers pushed through Norway’s mountains over enormous stretches of time, grinding out deep valleys as they moved. When the ice eventually retreated, seawater filled many of those valleys. Norway ended up with more than 1,000 fjords. Geirangerfjord is probably the one I’d show someone who had never seen one before. The mountains rise almost straight out of the water. Waterfalls drop down the cliffs, including the Seven Sisters, and old farms sit on steep slopes in places that seem strangely difficult to reach. Geirangerfjord and nearby Nærøyfjord are protected together as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Nærøyfjord feels completely different. It narrows dramatically in places, putting you much closer to the mountains on either side. Sognefjord gives you a better idea of just how enormous these landscapes can be. It stretches more than 200 kilometers inland and reaches roughly 1,300 meters at its deepest point. Then you start finding the others. Hardangerfjord runs through orchard country, where apples and cider are part of the local culture. Lysefjord has Pulpit Rock rising high above the water. Farther north, Trollfjord is much shorter and tighter, with steep mountains closing in around the boats passing through it. After a while, “seeing the fjords” starts to sound a little ridiculous. There are too many of them, and they aren’t interchangeable. If I were going for the first time, I’d probably start with Geirangerfjord. It gives you the huge mountain-and-water view most people associate with Norway. But I’d want to see one of the quieter ones too. One where you get on a boat, watch the shoreline disappear behind you and realize the mountains you’re looking at continue far below the surface of the water. That’s the kind of thing I like writing about in the Timeless Traveler newsletter. Not just where somewhere is or what to see, but the detail that makes you look at it differently once you get there. Subscribe if that sounds like the way you like to travel too.

The Timeless Traveler 🇺🇸

28,493 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ok, maybe this is me being nerdy but I found this seriously cool! We're on day 33 of our Xinjiang RV roadtrip and today we're going through one of China's most impressive recent engineering accomplishments: the longest highway tunnel in the world, almost 23km long, going underneath the TianShan mountains (called the "Tianshan Shengli Tunnel"). It opened in December last year. What's truly cool is that we managed to visit the tunnel command center, from which they monitor the traffic in the tunnel in real time. It's a FAR more sophisticated operation that I expected: look at this 👇, they monitor each individual car and truck in real time on a massive screen, and have advanced AI systems surface any issue the very second it arises. Without a doubt the single most high-tech tunnel monitoring system in the world. This tunnel is actually genuinely transformational for Xinjiang, probably the single most transformational infrastructure project in the region this millennia (so far): the big issue here is that you have the TianShan mountains, some of the highest mountains in the world (over 7000m high) that literally divide the region in 2 between North and South Xinjiang. Before the tunnel the only way people could travel between North and South (or vice versa) was through small perilous roads through the mountains, or by driving around the mountains - in either case a massive (and often dangerous) journey that would take many hours. The tunnel cuts it down to... just 20 minutes! The highway and tunnel cost an absolute fortune to build - some 40 billion yuan - and there's no way they're ever going to get it back from toll fees alone. But we asked the staff here and they said that when you consider the impact it'll have on Xinjiang's economy as a whole, it's not even close. And that's kind of the whole Chinese infrastructure philosophy in a nutshell: infrastructure is seen as a catalyst, you measure the return across the entire region for the next 50 years.

Arnaud Bertrand

86,344 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇨🇳 358.36 km/h! Three Chinese teens just broke a Guinness World Record with a micro drone. Then someone asked: “Looks impressive, but what can it actually do?” Wrong question. The real “use” isn’t the record. It’s the entire capability chain behind it. And the signal it sends. This isn’t a toy. This is a strategic signal. These kids aren’t “playing with drones.” They’re speaking the engineering mother tongue of a nation. What does it mean when a few 16-year-olds can push a small quadcopter to 358.36 km/h? It means they understand: • Aerodynamics • Materials science • Motor tuning • Control algorithms • Manufacturing workflows • Testing protocols This is not a lucky experiment. It’s a microcosm of system-level engineering ability. And a glimpse into the future. In 10 years, these kids may be building: • Hypersonic AI-powered UAVs • Tactical drone swarms • Anti-missile jammers • High-speed logistics drones • Aerospace modules From racing drones to battlefield units — the path is clear. Fast. Cheap. Swarming. Hard to shoot down. Multi-mission capable: recon, EW, jamming, decoys. The modern battlefield isn’t just tanks and missiles. It’s saturation + speed + scale. And this is the tactical Lego block. What some people call “toys”… Military labs elsewhere call: alpha models. But here’s the most important part: This proves China’s education pipeline is alive. Americans panic at this not because of the drone, But because they’re losing 10,000+ STEM PhDs a year. Meanwhile, China’s prefecture-level high schools are making kids who build these in the wild. This is the real power gap. You see a record. China sees this: “Our talent pool is starting to self-organize.” America is: • Pushing engineers away • Turning schools into churches • Slashing research budgets China is: “Children are building 350 km/h drones in open fields.” So you ask: “What’s the use?” This is the use. This is why the future doesn’t belong to you. It belongs to the people still building it. Not a record. A civilization trajectory.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

51,877 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten