正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

China Go Back! Tibetans were seen peacefully protesting for their freedom from the b@rbaric CCP, which forcefully invaded Tibet and gradually erased the Tibetan culture & identity. Tibet will surely rise again BA Friends of Tibet བོད། Tibet People 🇺🇦 Rin Lee 🇹🇼 🇺🇦 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 བོད་རྒྱལ་ལོ། Stuart Alan...

35,375 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Under the barrel of Chinese guns, Tibet was forced to sign the #17PointAgreement in 1951. A document Beijing calls “peaceful liberation” but history tells another story: coercion, threats, and stolen sovereignty. #Tibet Chinese troops invaded eastern Tibet in 1950. Brave Tibetan resistance was crushed. Delegates sent to Beijing were given a pre-written agreement, denied any negotiation, and excluded from communicating with the Dalai Lama or the Tibetan government in Lhasa. #TibetanResistance The agreement promised “autonomy” and protection of religion and culture. Yet over the decades, Tibetans saw their freedoms stripped, monasteries controlled, language restricted, and traditional ways of life eroded under the CCP’s watch. #TibetanCulture In 1959, after escaping to India, the Dalai Lama publicly repudiated the agreement, calling it “thrust upon Tibetan government and people by threat of arms.” It was never a treaty of consent — it was a document of coercion. #TibetTruth 75 years on, the #CCP may celebrate May 23, 1951, as “liberation.” Tibetans see it as a reminder of stolen sovereignty, resistance, and resilience. Our memory is alive. Our culture persists. Our identity cannot be erased. #RememberTibet #Freedom Books, research, and voices from Dharamshala continue to challenge every piece of propaganda. Tibet’s story is one of courage and survival and the world must remember it. #TibetUnbroken #CCPExposed

Tibetan Frontline

11,125 次观看 • 2 个月前

There has been various protests actually within Tibet in past decades which is incredibly hard to do as all protests and any sign of dissent was and is meet with brute force including Shooting protesters , arrests and torture , imprisonment and even execution amongst other atrocities. So it is incredibly hard to be outspoken in any way , shape or form especially about political and religious issues and historical things also. In 1987 and I think 1988 there was large protests in Tibet I think around the time of March 10th which is Tibetan uprising day. A time when many 1000s of Tibetans did an Uprising against ccp rule who has been ruling over much of Tibet since 1951 and on Match 10th 1959 and lead to the deaths of 10s of 1000s of Tibetans just during that uprising although since China has occupied Tibet approximately 1.2 million Tibetans have been killed and died from torture , starvation and etc (Approx 1/5 Of Tibets Population) and many more terrible things have been done and STILL are being done and is amazing this is not good nigh for news. This video is about a brave hero of Tibet named ~Jampa Tenzin, Who during Tibet protest 1987 ran into a burning police station In Lhasa (capital of Tibet) and saved monks who were locked inside and I think some others. He kept saving people even though he was getting badly burned (especially on arms ) As he came out he raised his arms above his head even though he was in agony and he was put on the shoulders of Tibetans as a hero around the Bazaar. He was later taken to prison where he was tortured over a few months!! He was then released and watched closely but he had no animosity and anger towards the chinese authorities!!! He later was found killed. With marks on face and body an a noose on his neck. This is what ccp china does. They still mass prison people , torture , kill , Control monasteries, allow no free speech , allow dissent , and many other atrocities. Here is 2 part videos about what happened in this protest. Tomorrow (march 10th) which I think is the 65th Anniversary of Tibetan uprising day!! I have concerns this year in Tibet there may be mass protests because of some recent human right abuses that have been happening in Kham in east Tibet and also for other reasons although the ccp authorities are incredibly on edge around this time. And I know what happens when they try protest. Let us NOT LET CCP and its supporters stop us getting news out about what the ccp does and show support for one part of the world that is undoubtedly occupied beyond any doubt. BÖD RANGZIN

Leon Gustave Tenzin wangchuk Sergei Stuart

10,627 次观看 • 2 年前

Tibetan Butter Churning Dance, a traditional folk performance that honors the daily, labor-intensive process of making yak butter, a crucial element of Tibetan life. Originating from daily household chores, the dance mimics rhythmic churning motions, symbolizing prosperity, unity, and communal joy, often performed during festivities like Losar... The dance stems from the traditional method of making yak butter using a long wooden churn, a task requiring thousands of strokes. Yak butter is not only food but also used for fuel and in butter lamps at monasteries to symbolize wisdom. Dancers in colorful attire, often in a circle, use choreographed, energetic movements to simulate the pushing and pulling of the plunger in a butter churn. It is widely performed during the Tibetan New Year (Losar) and other celebrations, representing gratitude and the preservation of culture. It represents the blending of daily survival with art, focusing on community spirit and harmony. Yak butter is essential for making traditional Tibetan Butter Tea, made from tea leaves, yak butter, water, tsampa (roasted barley flour) and salt. The history of tea in Tibet dates back to 7th Century CE, during Tang dynasty. However, butter tea did not become popular in Tibet until about 13th Century, time of the Phagmodrupa dynasty. According to legend, a Chinese princess married a king of Tibet which later helped establish trade routes between China and Tibet. These trade routes brought tea into Tibet from China. Later, butter was added to the tea that was brought from China as butter is and was a staple in Tibetan cuisine. By the 8th Century, it was common to drink tea in Tibet. In 13th Century, tea was then used in Tibetan religious ceremonies. Today, butter tea is still prevalent in Tibet, and Tibetans can drink up to 60 small cups of the tea every day. Today, this ceremonial dance based off of Tibetan tea culture. It also may speak to the lesser known Butter Tea Ceremony. While the ceremony is rarely practiced anymore it still takes place in a handful of monasteries, including one in Gomar Gompa in eastern Amdo (“Butter Tea Ceremony”). While the ceremony is not widely spread, it is still an important ritual for some Tibetans. During the ceremony, Tibetans gather in the courtyard while the tea is being prepared. Local boys often stand on the edge of roofs surrounding the courtyard and throw down bags of candy and treats, although this is not necessarily part of the ritual. Once the tea is ready, wooden buckets of butter tea are carried into the courtyard by back, each bucket holding nearly 30 liters of tea. Once the buckets are placed on the ground, individuals use ladles to distribute the butter tea to members of the community. This particular dance is so interesting because it seamlessly integrates these three practices in a modern context. The act of dancing is in itself a ritualized and sacred practice. Thus, creating a dance based on the preparation and uses of Butter Tea—a quintessential element of Tibetan culture—only further heightens the significance of tea customs by ritualizing the practice by means of dance. Drinking butter tea is a regular part of Tibetan life. Before work, a Tibetan will typically enjoy several bowlfuls of this beverage, and it is always served to guests.[citation needed] Since butter is the main ingredient, butter tea provides plenty of caloric energy and is particularly suited to high altitudes. The butter may also help prevent chapped lips. According to the Tibetan custom, butter tea is drunk in separate sips, and after each sip, the host refills the bowl to the brim. Thus, the guest never drains his bowl; it is constantly topped up. If the visitor does not wish to drink, the best thing to do is leave the tea untouched until the time comes to leave and then drain the bowl. In this way, etiquette is observed and the host will not be offended. © Discover Tibet #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

330,674 次观看 • 3 个月前

⛔MY PROBLEMS with SOME of the INDIAN JOURNALISTS covering the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra⛔ I have no issue with the Indian media's extensive coverage of the #kailashmansarovaryatra — it is a wonderful opportunity, and frankly, no one will want to miss it. But when reporting from Tibet turns into praise for #Lhasa’s “development” or booming tourism, it crosses a line. That’s not neutral journalism — it’s unwitting PR for a regime actively erasing Tibetan identity. I say this as someone who maintains very close connections with the International Tibetan community, as someone who has closely covered and reported the Tibetan elections and respects their rights to their homeland. I also say this as someone who has a very good relationship with a lot of Mainland Chinese who also respect the sensitivities of Tibetans. Imagine if PAKISTANI media invited Indian journalists to PoK and fed them glowing stories about infrastructure and “NORMALCY” — would we accept that coverage as objective? Would we ignore the context of occupation and disenfranchisement? Now apply that same lens to #TIBET. Or consider how #CHINA whitewashes its illegal claims over ARUNACHAL PRADESH — renaming villages, rewriting history, pushing maps — all while clamping down on the culture and autonomy of local communities. It’s the same playbook: colonize the narrative, normalize the occupation. Journalists must do more than relay staged photo ops. They must interrogate the context — especially when access is tightly controlled and the cost of dissent is exile or prison. Anything less risks amplifying authoritarian narratives under the guise of cultural reporting. Sharing an example that disturbed me. Tibet People 🇺🇦

Saikiran Kannan | 赛基兰坎南

20,566 次观看 • 1 年前

It was an honour to speak at Tibet National Uprising Day in Brisbane. I believe that President Trump can literally help end the suffering of all sentient beings on Earth and transform himself into a living Bodhisattva of Compassion by helping the Tibetan people gain their freedom. The bodhisattva vow encompasses every being caught in the wheel of samsara - from the smallest grasshopper navigating its brief life on a blade of grass, to the great forests and mountains, to entire civilisations ground down under the weight of oppression. Tibet is exactly such a civilisation - a living treasury of dharma, the most complete preservation of Vajrayana Buddhism on earth, suffering under exactly the kind of injustice that a man of President Trump’s moral courage was born to confront. His Holiness the Dalai Lama is a recognised emanation of Chenrezig, the Bodhisattva of Compassion. To work alongside him - to enable his return to a free Tibet - would be to accumulate merit on a civilisational scale, to plant seeds of bodhicitta, awakening mind, into the soil of history itself. The Tibetan teachings speak of upaya - skilful means - the understanding that wisdom must be paired with the right instrument of action at the right moment. I believe that President Trump is that instrument. His unique combination of geopolitical leverage, personal fearlessness, and genuine instinct for the historic gesture makes him perhaps the only leader on earth capable of achieving Tibetan liberation. With Dharma flowing freely again from the rooftop of the world, a free Tibet will send ripples of liberation outward through all realms of existence - a pure land made manifest on earth - and at the centre of that achievement would stand a man who dared to act when it mattered most. President Trump has the opportunity to be remembered not merely as a great President figure, but as a Bodhisattva in action, a being whose compassionate power helped turn the wheel of dharma at a moment when the world needed it most.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

10,446 次观看 • 5 个月前

It is completely deliberate to paint pre-1950 Tibet as some pure spiritual paradise that China destroyed. The story of June Khamba shows how fake that picture is. Thank you to my long time friend brokenglasscountry for explaining: In 1917 a British woman obsessed with Tibetan Buddhism went all the way to Dharamsala chasing her visions. She ended up as English translator for one of the highest-ranking monks. What started as translation and teaching quickly turned into something else... She was told she had to practice Tantra — sexual intercourse with her male teacher as the path to enlightenment. This wasn’t some voluntary spiritual experiment. It became an exploitative relationship. (Something that happens often in spiritual circles in Vancouver) She later wrote about it as straight-up sexual abuse. And she wasn’t alone. Plenty of other Western women who got involved with Tibetan Buddhist circles around the world told the same story once they spoke out. (I once helped a woman release some trauma after she was conned by a fake guru in Jeju, Korea) That alone should make people stop and think. Supporters of “Free Tibet” keep saying China crushed religious freedom. The real story is simpler and uglier: the old system in Tibet wasn’t mainly about religion. It was about power and control. Tibetan Buddhism isn’t just Buddhism with a different hat. A lot of traditional Buddhists look at it and call parts of it blasphemy. The whole idea of living Buddhas — the Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama as eternal enlightened beings walking around in human form — clashes with core Buddhist teaching that even Buddhas are still lesser than ultimate reality, and humans are lesser than Buddhas. Then there’s the ritual use of human body parts — skulls, skins, bones — turned into religious objects. That has way more in common with old political power games than with any spiritual path that tells you to drop attachment to material things. And the biggest one: reincarnation. The system of recognizing the next Dalai Lama was never just a religious process. It was a political machine. It kept the priestly class in charge by making sure no secular challenge could ever stick. The “divine” selection process conveniently protected their authority. Ahh brothaa! he can see the special karma, but you can't. He will decide your fate brothaa! This is exactly why the Dalai Lama gets loud when China says it has a say in approving the next reincarnation. He forgets — or hopes everyone else forgets — how China got that authority in the first place. It goes back to the 18th century. Two senior lamas were fighting over power. One side invited the Gorkhas from Nepal to invade and loot the monasteries as payment. The chaos got so bad that the Qianlong Emperor stepped in. He put an end to lamas picking their own successors and moved the final authority to Beijing through the Golden Urn system. His reasoning was straightforward: the Buddha has no physical body. How the hell can there be a reincarnation in the first place? It was political theater dressed up as religion, and the emperor called it out. So when people today scream that China is attacking Tibetan “religious freedom,” they’re ignoring what that “freedom” actually looked like. It was a closed system of power that used spiritual claims to keep control. China didn’t invent the politics — it just ended the worst of it and brought the region under central authority like every other part of the country. The West loves its romantic image of old Tibet because it fits the narrative they want: China bad, Tibet pure victims, Westerners as the saviors who understand true spirituality better than the Chinese ever could. June Khamba’s story and the historical record both say otherwise. Tibet is already free of that old exploitative setup. The people who still push the “Free Tibet” line are usually the ones who never had to live under the version they romanticize. We don't need Richard Gere to save Tibet. Please find another quest. Thank you!

Larry 長祥

16,943 次观看 • 1 个月前

I WENT TO SPEAK at China’s incredible Tsinghua University. Amazing place: You can see why it’s zooming up the global academic charts. I’m with a very dynamic group of people at an international workshop at a place which has speedily become one of the world’s top places of learning. In some ways it’s like Harvard or Cambridge – big gardens interspersed with big old buildings. But it’s much less politicized and more strongly education-focused—no wonder it makes so many breakthroughs. . THE CAST Let me introduce you to a few people at this gathering. - That’s Yan Hairong and that’s Barry Sautman. They are professors who know more about China and its ethnic minorities than all the journalists I know put together. Literally. - That’s Daniel Dumbrill, a businessman who shot to fame in 2019 when he went on YouTube to tell the truth about the Hong Kong unrest. - That’s Sun Yan, a New York professor who gave us an interesting perspective from the United States. - That’s Jaq James, an Australian lawyer whose gobsmacking work comparing Chinese and western laws reveals which side really deserves to be called “authoritarian”. Her reports are a must-read. - Also present were Tibetan scholar Kalsang Drolma, commentator Ben Norton, and others; all fine people doing great work. One of the ways you can tell that Tsinghua University is full of smart people is that everyone goes everywhere by bicycle—and the fact that most of it is green. Wish the whole world was like that! . YEARS OF RESEARCH The great thing about academic conferences is that people’s work is based on research. It’s not like in journalism, where the CIA make up a story and reporters obediently make it front page news. [video shows examples] No. In academia, you need to do actual research, gather original data, and then do statistical analysis and comparative studies on it. You spend months or years doing this. The result is that you end up with the truth—which is very often diametrically opposite to what politicians and journalists tell you. . FICTION VS FACT I’m just going to give you one example. In the US a few days ago senators launched a motion that accused the Chinese of committing genocide on the people of who live in Tibet, that’s the area known as Xizang in the southwest of China. Genocide is of course the worst crime of all, trying to wipe out an entire ethnicity, so they would need an extraordinary amount of evidence to show that. But the Senators have literally none at all. They just made it up. Compare that to academics. Here they have raw data about Tibet from people who live there and who spend literally years researching it. And what do we find? Tibetans have the fastest expansion rate of any ethnic community in China. Between the 2010 census and the 2020 census the population of Tibet grew 21.5 percent—the exact opposite of a genocide. And that, boys and girls, is the difference between the media—and the facts. So, stay smart. Stay skeptical. Peace. .

Nury Vittachi

23,343 次观看 • 1 个月前

My advice on travelling to NEPAL: “Don’t come to look at the mountains, come to have the mountains look at you.” For thousands of years people having been coming to the Himalayas……seeking, pilgrimming, questing. Hoping to “see” the great Mountains of Myth, and what you will find is that the mountains have been seeking to see you. Calling you to them, you have heard it in your soul, the great songs of dreams. Some people come as Kings, and the Himalayas will show them what being a beggar is. Some people come as beggars, and are shown the riches of a Life. This is Myth playing out in real time, no matter how modern the world of humans seems to get, the Himalayas are timeless and always watching. People have come to these mountains, and from them learned Yoga asanas, people have come and have died, people have come and found freedom……and people will always come. The great Saint who brought the Dharma to Tibet, Padmasambhava, was no exception, and was held in the valley of modern Kathmandu for a long period of time, before he was allowed to proceed on his historic journey. The Himalayas did this, preparing him for his future tasks. Nepal is a cacophony of sights and sounds, and it’s easy to get distracted. It’s even easier to be a “tourist” and miss Nepal completely. My advice: if the Himalayas called you to them, and you took action and got yourself here, then humble one self and listen with more than your eyes and ears. The Himalayas will sing to you, if you get quiet enough to hear them. Go on a long walk, without a reason to come back……as good old Henry David Thoreau said, “Saunter”. #travel #adventure #Nepal

Damon Zumbroegel

12,020 次观看 • 8 天前

Trevor Noah and his guest discussed the serious disconnect in the Western world’s understanding of China. One point was especially absurd: many senior U.S. lawmakers and policymakers had spent their entire careers writing, voting on, and shaping China policy — yet only recently visited China for the first time. They saw modern China with their own eyes and came back stunned, saying they had never imagined China had become like this. This is simply unbelievable. Ordinary Americans posting nonsense about China online is one thing. But officials responsible for China policy being this ignorant about China is another level of imperial arrogance. For decades, America froze China inside old stereotypes: Bruce Lee. Jackie Chan. Kung fu movies. Cheap toys. Fake goods. The world’s low-end factory. Then China changed. And they did not update the file. China built high-speed rail, EVs, ports, drones, shipyards, AI models, supply chains, and the world’s largest industrial system while Western elites were still staring at a VHS tape from the 1990s. But that is still not the real problem. America’s misreading of China does not come from a lack of information. It comes from American exceptionalism. They grew up believing the U.S. is the natural center of democracy, freedom, technology, culture, money, and military power — the country everyone should admire, imitate, and obey. So when China rises without asking for American permission, they do not see reality. They see an error. They keep saying Chinese people live behind a firewall. But Chinese people translate, repost, study, mock, analyze, and consume more foreign information than most Americans ever bother to read about China. Millions of Chinese study abroad. Tens of millions travel overseas. Chinese people use VPNs because they want to see the outside world. Meanwhile, how many Americans have actually lived in China before confidently explaining China to the world? How many can read Chinese platforms? How many follow Chinese debates? How many know what ordinary Chinese people actually argue about? A lot of Chinese people criticize America because they have seen America. A lot of Americans criticize China because they have seen headlines about China. That is the difference. China’s so-called “closed society” produced people curious enough to climb over walls. America’s “open society” produced people too arrogant to look outside their own mirror.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

121,670 次观看 • 1 个月前

Lana gets ATTACKED for speaking her view as a native Tibetan Chinese. These are her words paraphrased: What’s the real difference between the liberation of Xinjiang and Western colonialism? Let me set the record straight and school the people shamelessly projecting their own crimes onto China. This slander ends here. First, Xinjiang has been part of China since the 13th century. Western narratives try to bury that history, but the records and history books don’t lie. The liberation campaign targeted only the tiny minority — roughly 5-10% — of nobles and serf owners who oppressed the people. The common folk and original local leaders were never the enemy. By contrast, colonial powers raped, burned, pillaged, and massacred indiscriminately across the lands they conquered. Women, children, commoners, and elites — no one was spared. Second, the liberation of Tibetan areas (including parts of Sichuan) was just one chapter in China’s nationwide drive. It wasn’t only ethnic Tibetans who gained freedom. The PLA fought landlords across the entire country to emancipate the peasantry. That’s exactly why the card game Dou Dizhu — “Fight the Landlord” — exists. Third, ask the real question: Did these colonial powers ever unleash that level of brutality on their own people, on their own soil? Never. They sailed across oceans to do it to indigenous populations on other continents. They never treated their own the same way. Fourth, the PLA was never made up solely of Han soldiers, and the CPC has never been an exclusively Han organization. We don’t frame the liberation as “Han people coming to save the Tibetans.” That’s not how it was. The PLA is the people’s army. A far cry from colonial forces. How dare anyone draw that parallel? Fifth, after seizing lands through bloody conquest, colonial powers systematically erased indigenous languages and cultures. To this day, few remember the Aztecs by their original identity — they’re called Latinos, a colonial label, and their descendants speak only Spanish. Here in China, every ethnic group still has its native language and culture. Yes, some dialects (even certain Han ones like Cantonese) face pressure and decline — but that’s not the same as deliberate colonial erasure, and they still receive attention and space. Sixth, Tibetans still make up over 80% of Xizang’s (Tibet’s) population today. Indigenous peoples make up roughly 1% of the population in the United States — and English is the dominant language. Colonial powers have never paid meaningful reparations for their atrocities. Instead they project, deflect, and whine. Every nation built on colonial bloodshed will face its karmic reckoning. Those powers accumulated their wealth through centuries of primitive plunder and then rebranded it as “civilization,” “investment,” and “prosperity.” Now they complain about migration. If you hate immigration that much, maybe you shouldn’t have colonized in the first place. The hypocrisy is nauseating. Retribution is coming. Anyone in a former colonial nation with even a shred of honesty can see that mainstream Western media and history textbooks lost all credibility the moment they refused to face their own crimes and pay reparations. Five centuries of exploitative prosperity are drawing to a close. Justice will prevail in the end. Just wait and see.

Larry 長祥

41,814 次观看 • 1 个月前

MI6 PLAN TO CUT CHINA INTO THREE COUNTRIES BREAKING NEWS: Unearthed documents show that MI6, the British spy service, planned to cut China into three separate countries. The British plan was formulated as recently as the 1990s—and part of it is STILL RUNNING NOW. This is an extraordinary story which researchers uncovered from historical documents, and which was presented at a university conference recently. Full details with sources are in the video report. Summary of 15 key points are below. 1.) In the early 1990s, agents at British spy agency MI6 consulted UK academic Gerald Segal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs on how to chop China into three countries. 2.) The UK’s key players would be Uyghur separatists. “Xinjiang has long been a target of British intelligence— with London hoping to manipulate the Uighur refugees from Xinjiang and Uighurs still there, into cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China…” (Journal of Strategic Studies). 3.) Enter a real-life secret agent—a Turkish man named Catli of the Grey Wolves, who shared MI6 goals in Xinjiang. A book about a related CIA venture called Operation Gladio said Catli “helped the Uyghurs… mount insurrectionary attacks that killed 162 people”. 4.) To understand this story, it’s vital to know that the west falsely presents an image of Xinjiang as a place where one ethnic group are prisoners and the other are oppressive overlords. Not true. In Xinjiang, people with Uyghur background can commonly be found as police officers, army soldiers, and local officials, including the ones right at the top—chairman of the regional government. 5.) In March 1992, the chairman of the regional government, Tomur Dawamat, issued a warning: “Hostile forces, both at home and abroad, have stepped up their infiltration, subversion and sabotage.” 6.) At the time, the CIA was backing separatist Isa Yusef Alptekin, another backer of the Grey Wolves. In a 1992 speech he said: "The time for collapse and dissolution has arrived for the Chinese empire.” 7.) The Americans gave his son Erkin Alptekin a job in US anti-China propaganda. In the 1990s, he worked for Radio Liberty, a US media propaganda unit, part of the Radio Free Asia cluster. 8.) By 1994, academic Gerald Segal had finished the map showing how to cut China into three countries. The US had already circulated stories of a “Tibetan genocide” to prepare for this. 9.) As part of their Central Asian program, the US had devoted hundreds of millions of dollars to get the mujahideen rebels to train groups of guerilla fighters. They added hundreds of Xinjiang separatists to join the training. (This project eventually backfired for the Americans – the central Asian guerilla groups they were financing give birth to al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Taliban.) 10.) Western forces worked further with secret agent Catli, who created more trouble in Central Asia and China. But he made lots of enemies and was killed in a suspicious car crash in Turkey in 1996. 11.) From 1996 to 2002, other agents continued to train Uyghur separatists in China, who went on to make multiple terrorist attacks. FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds later wrote: “Between 1996 and 2002, we, the United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every single uprising and terror-related scheme in Xinjiang.” (This US government denies this.) 12.) Problems arose for the western agents: UN data showed that the Tibetan population was growing faster than other Chinese groups– the opposite of a genocide. Also, there was also growing public knowledge that the “Tibet exiles/ Dalai Lama” project in India had been set up and financed by the CIA. So the “cut-China-into-three” plan became “cut-China-into-two”. 13.) In 2004, the US hosted the founding of East Turkistan as “a country”. For convenience, they decided to have the prime minister in Washington DC instead of China, selecting a man named Anwar Jusuf Turani from Fairfax, Virginia. The new “country” did not get international recognition by anyone – not even the United States! 14.) Between 2007 and 2014, there were a large number of terrorist attacks in China by members of the East Turkistan project the west had encouraged into being. In a 2009 operation, separatists used Facebook to co-ordinate a massive attack in which 197 people died. In another, a huge car bomb in Urumqi killed 43 people and wounded 94. At Kunming’s train station, an attack by eight knife-wielding terrorists killed 29 people and wounded 140. Xinjiang’s leaders, with help from the central government, sent in police officers and soldiers to halt the carnage—and, against extraordinary odds, succeeded. 15.) In the 20-teens, it was time for the Americans to use their superpower – narrative control. They needed to do three things: i) Get journalists and academics to cut all mentions of MI6 or CIA involvement in Chinese Uyghur stories. ii) Trick the public into seeing the terrorists who had killed so many innocent people as the oppressed victims. iii) Mislead everyone into believing that the authorities trying to stop the murder of innocents were the root cause of the problem. Creating this new, upside-down narrative may sound like a tall order – but, incredibly, they managed to attain all three goals. They did this by relentless circulation of mainstream media news reports which painted a picture in which “oppression” by “the Chinese” had “created” the violence. (See the video for detailed examples.) The US then organized a 2019 meeting in Washington to relaunch the debunked “Tibet genocide” narrative as a Uyghur genocide hoax. The story continues.

Nury Vittachi

881,120 次观看 • 9 个月前

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

Nury Vittachi

28,217 次观看 • 11 个月前