Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇨🇳 CHINA'S DEVELOPING A NUCLEAR TSUNAMI BOMB THAT COULD SINK THE UK China is working on a next-gen underwater weapon modeled after Russia’s Poseidon, a nuclear-powered torpedo designed to trigger apocalyptic tsunamis. We're talking waves up to 2 kilometers tall. Not splashes. Skyscraper-sized walls of water that could erase...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,871,449 subscribers

212,186 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇨🇳 CHINA SHOWS OFF MISSILE THAT COULD TURN NYC INTO DUST China just rolled out the DF-5B - a long-range missile that can carry multiple nuclear warheads, each with a blast 200+ times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. It can travel 12,000 km, meaning if it launched from Beijing, it could hit New York before your Uber Eats order arrives. The warheads pack 3 to 4 megatons of power. Not kilotons. Mega. Ton. As in, wipe-out-an-entire-city level destruction. This isn’t some new tech either. The DF-5B’s been around for years. China’s just reminding the world it’s still very much on the table. Source: Reuters
0:21

🇨🇳 CHINA SHOWS OFF MISSILE THAT COULD TURN NYC INTO DUST China just rolled out the DF-5B - a long-range missile that can carry multiple nuclear warheads, each with a blast 200+ times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. It can travel 12,000 km, meaning if it launched from Beijing, it could hit New York before your Uber Eats order arrives. The warheads pack 3 to 4 megatons of power. Not kilotons. Mega. Ton. As in, wipe-out-an-entire-city level destruction. This isn’t some new tech either. The DF-5B’s been around for years. China’s just reminding the world it’s still very much on the table. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

516,893 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇷🇺 POSEIDON: RUSSIA’S UNDERWATER DOOMSDAY TORPEDO No, it’s not a 300-megaton super-nuke that will unleash a 1,500-foot radioactive tsunami to swallow cities whole - but it’s still terrifying. Russia’s Poseidon is a nuclear-powered, unmanned underwater drone, not a missile. It travels entirely underwater, bypassing missile defenses by cruising in stealth mode at low speeds and deep depths. Its likely yield? Somewhere between 2 and 10 megatons, enough to flatten coastal cities and irradiate harbors, but not to flood continents. Designed for a second-strike, it can sneak close to U.S shores and detonate offshore - spreading radioactive seawater and wrecking infrastructure. The Pentagon calls it “difficult to detect,” but not invisible - and definitely not invincible. Western navies are already working on ways to counter it. So no, it won’t destroy half the planet. But it’s a floating nuclear death bot with a grudge, and that’s bad enough. Source: FT, The Bulletin, National Interest
0:33

🇷🇺 POSEIDON: RUSSIA’S UNDERWATER DOOMSDAY TORPEDO No, it’s not a 300-megaton super-nuke that will unleash a 1,500-foot radioactive tsunami to swallow cities whole - but it’s still terrifying. Russia’s Poseidon is a nuclear-powered, unmanned underwater drone, not a missile. It travels entirely underwater, bypassing missile defenses by cruising in stealth mode at low speeds and deep depths. Its likely yield? Somewhere between 2 and 10 megatons, enough to flatten coastal cities and irradiate harbors, but not to flood continents. Designed for a second-strike, it can sneak close to U.S shores and detonate offshore - spreading radioactive seawater and wrecking infrastructure. The Pentagon calls it “difficult to detect,” but not invisible - and definitely not invincible. Western navies are already working on ways to counter it. So no, it won’t destroy half the planet. But it’s a floating nuclear death bot with a grudge, and that’s bad enough. Source: FT, The Bulletin, National Interest

Mario Nawfal

465,535 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:42

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

52,238 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'Iran could test a NUCLEAR WEAPON, and the US may not even know the test happened.' 'The North Koreans tested a nuclear weapon, and we didn’t even know they had tested. We got a readout from Geneva and the seismic centre there. We finally detected the second North Korean test. It’s not infallible that you’re going to detect the test, and Iran could have already made the decision and could be working underground, could have already matched warhead to missile, and be ready to go whenever they need to go. Or it could be pregnant, as it were, and ready to happen at any moment they decide. Bibi might be contemplating using a nuclear weapon on them. I think that’s the main purpose that the Iranians might have made a decision to do otherwise than their Fatwa against building nuclear weapons.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:14

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'Iran could test a NUCLEAR WEAPON, and the US may not even know the test happened.' 'The North Koreans tested a nuclear weapon, and we didn’t even know they had tested. We got a readout from Geneva and the seismic centre there. We finally detected the second North Korean test. It’s not infallible that you’re going to detect the test, and Iran could have already made the decision and could be working underground, could have already matched warhead to missile, and be ready to go whenever they need to go. Or it could be pregnant, as it were, and ready to happen at any moment they decide. Bibi might be contemplating using a nuclear weapon on them. I think that’s the main purpose that the Iranians might have made a decision to do otherwise than their Fatwa against building nuclear weapons.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

26,810 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.
0:59

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

NewRulesGeopolitics

56,252 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.
0:29

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

Kyle Becker

385,090 просмотров • 1 год назад

Lue Elizondo: “If these UFO's land on the White House lawn tomorrow, do I put my hand out in friendship, or do I point an M16 to its head?” 👽🛸 In a recent discussion the former Pentagon official confirmed that OPLAN Interloper was a real operational plan developed under AATIP. It was designed as a classic honeypot, creating an irresistible nuclear footprint with carrier strike groups and other nuclear assets because UAP show a consistent interest in nuclear equities and large bodies of water. Elizondo noted the two major commonalities observed globally are nuclear technology and water. He added he would not be surprised if similar plans have already been executed. On the general’s question he replied that it is not a binary choice. Treating it as either-or could doom us. Intent matters. If the phenomenon is violent and we offer friendship it may be seen as weakness. If it is advanced but not hostile and we raise a weapon it may provoke a response we do not want. The plan reached high levels of coordination before it was stopped.
3:45

Lue Elizondo: “If these UFO's land on the White House lawn tomorrow, do I put my hand out in friendship, or do I point an M16 to its head?” 👽🛸 In a recent discussion the former Pentagon official confirmed that OPLAN Interloper was a real operational plan developed under AATIP. It was designed as a classic honeypot, creating an irresistible nuclear footprint with carrier strike groups and other nuclear assets because UAP show a consistent interest in nuclear equities and large bodies of water. Elizondo noted the two major commonalities observed globally are nuclear technology and water. He added he would not be surprised if similar plans have already been executed. On the general’s question he replied that it is not a binary choice. Treating it as either-or could doom us. Intent matters. If the phenomenon is violent and we offer friendship it may be seen as weakness. If it is advanced but not hostile and we raise a weapon it may provoke a response we do not want. The plan reached high levels of coordination before it was stopped.

Interstellar

14,694 просмотров • 16 дней назад

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:
1:14

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.
0:23

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

NSTRIKE

56,879 просмотров • 5 дней назад

55 years ago, the US government decided to see what would happen if they buried a massive hydrogen bomb inside an island and detonated it. This wasn't just any test; "Project Cannikin" was the largest underground nuclear explosion in American history, packing a force nearly 400 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. On November 6, 1971, on the remote Alaskan island of Amchitka, they pushed the button. The blast was so violent that it registered as a 7.0 magnitude earthquake. The force physically lifted the entire island about 20 feet into the air before it slammed back down, collapsing the ground and creating a massive crater that filled with water to form a new lake which is still there today. The lead-up to the explosion was filled with panic. Scientists and critics warned that the shock could trigger a massive tsunami or even a chain reaction of earthquakes that would devastate the planet. While the apocalypse didn't happen, the shockwave instantly killed thousands of sea otters and birds. A small group of activists tried to sail an old fishing boat into the test zone to stop the blast. They failed to stop the bomb, but that specific voyage is what officially launched the organization now known as Greenpeace.
0:28

55 years ago, the US government decided to see what would happen if they buried a massive hydrogen bomb inside an island and detonated it. This wasn't just any test; "Project Cannikin" was the largest underground nuclear explosion in American history, packing a force nearly 400 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. On November 6, 1971, on the remote Alaskan island of Amchitka, they pushed the button. The blast was so violent that it registered as a 7.0 magnitude earthquake. The force physically lifted the entire island about 20 feet into the air before it slammed back down, collapsing the ground and creating a massive crater that filled with water to form a new lake which is still there today. The lead-up to the explosion was filled with panic. Scientists and critics warned that the shock could trigger a massive tsunami or even a chain reaction of earthquakes that would devastate the planet. While the apocalypse didn't happen, the shockwave instantly killed thousands of sea otters and birds. A small group of activists tried to sail an old fishing boat into the test zone to stop the blast. They failed to stop the bomb, but that specific voyage is what officially launched the organization now known as Greenpeace.

Lemma Wild

2,434,390 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."
8:25

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

Eric Daugherty

967,602 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE LARGEST NUCLEAR BOMB STRUCK NEW YORK" The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba in 1961, with a yield of 50 megatons of TNT. No larger weapon has been built or tested, and modern arsenals focus on smaller, more precise warheads. Should a nuclear war break out involving Russia, the death toll on both sides would be significant. Based on simulations from NUKEMAP by historian Alex Wellerstein, it is estimated that approximately 7.6 million people would die and 4.2 million would be injured in the New York metropolitan area if Russia launched an attack on New York using a Tsar Bomba. The entire New York City area, much of northern New Jersey, parts of Long Island, and southern Connecticut would face devastating blast waves, thermal radiation, and firestorms. A massive mushroom cloud would rise tens of miles high, visible from hundreds of miles away. This scenario is purely hypothetical - nuclear weapons today are far smaller but it underscores the catastrophic potential even of "legacy" extremes like Tsar Bomba. Stay safe!
0:35

"WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE LARGEST NUCLEAR BOMB STRUCK NEW YORK" The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba in 1961, with a yield of 50 megatons of TNT. No larger weapon has been built or tested, and modern arsenals focus on smaller, more precise warheads. Should a nuclear war break out involving Russia, the death toll on both sides would be significant. Based on simulations from NUKEMAP by historian Alex Wellerstein, it is estimated that approximately 7.6 million people would die and 4.2 million would be injured in the New York metropolitan area if Russia launched an attack on New York using a Tsar Bomba. The entire New York City area, much of northern New Jersey, parts of Long Island, and southern Connecticut would face devastating blast waves, thermal radiation, and firestorms. A massive mushroom cloud would rise tens of miles high, visible from hundreds of miles away. This scenario is purely hypothetical - nuclear weapons today are far smaller but it underscores the catastrophic potential even of "legacy" extremes like Tsar Bomba. Stay safe!

Global Strategy

308,624 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,233 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

July 25, 1946. The United States set off an atomic bomb underwater in a tropical lagoon, creating one of the most terrifying and unforgettable images of the nuclear age. It was part of a series of tests at Bikini Atoll in the Pacific, where the military parked a whole fleet of old warships in the lagoon to see what nuclear weapons would do to a navy. On this day they detonated a bomb beneath the surface of the water, right in the middle of the target ships. The result was apocalyptic. The blast heaved a colossal column of radioactive seawater thousands of feet into the sky, a churning white wall of spray with ships flipping like toys at its base. The famous photo of that towering column of water is burned into history. It also drenched the fleet in so much radiation that many ships were too contaminated to ever be used again. There was a human cost that gets overlooked. The people who lived on Bikini had been moved off their own islands for these tests and would struggle for generations to ever return home. And in a bizarre footnote, a French designer had just named his shocking new swimsuit the bikini, betting it would be as explosive as the bomb. The name stuck, but the real story on this day was far darker. Video via
5:52

July 25, 1946. The United States set off an atomic bomb underwater in a tropical lagoon, creating one of the most terrifying and unforgettable images of the nuclear age. It was part of a series of tests at Bikini Atoll in the Pacific, where the military parked a whole fleet of old warships in the lagoon to see what nuclear weapons would do to a navy. On this day they detonated a bomb beneath the surface of the water, right in the middle of the target ships. The result was apocalyptic. The blast heaved a colossal column of radioactive seawater thousands of feet into the sky, a churning white wall of spray with ships flipping like toys at its base. The famous photo of that towering column of water is burned into history. It also drenched the fleet in so much radiation that many ships were too contaminated to ever be used again. There was a human cost that gets overlooked. The people who lived on Bikini had been moved off their own islands for these tests and would struggle for generations to ever return home. And in a bizarre footnote, a French designer had just named his shocking new swimsuit the bikini, betting it would be as explosive as the bomb. The name stuck, but the real story on this day was far darker. Video via

Echoes of War

62,375 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Former US State Department Senior Advisor for Iran: Israel wants to reduce Iran to a NON-FUNCTIONING state! ‘There is definitely a feeling that for Israel, unlike the United States, Iran is an existential threat, or perceives Iran to be an existential threat. And whereas President Trump could well be satisfied with a good deal on the nuclear issue, Israel seems to be dedicated to the proposition that the Islamic Republic, in and of itself, is unacceptable for Israel. So limitations on nuclear would not be enough. Limitations on missile and proxies would not be enough. They feel that as long as Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is a functioning state that can project power, Israel is under threat. I think Israel, Israel’s goal, or at least a part of the Cabinet, is to so weaken this regime that it’s unable to project any type of power that could threaten Israel.’ -The State Department’s First Persian-Language Spokesperson Alan Eyre Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
1:20

🚨Former US State Department Senior Advisor for Iran: Israel wants to reduce Iran to a NON-FUNCTIONING state! ‘There is definitely a feeling that for Israel, unlike the United States, Iran is an existential threat, or perceives Iran to be an existential threat. And whereas President Trump could well be satisfied with a good deal on the nuclear issue, Israel seems to be dedicated to the proposition that the Islamic Republic, in and of itself, is unacceptable for Israel. So limitations on nuclear would not be enough. Limitations on missile and proxies would not be enough. They feel that as long as Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is a functioning state that can project power, Israel is under threat. I think Israel, Israel’s goal, or at least a part of the Cabinet, is to so weaken this regime that it’s unable to project any type of power that could threaten Israel.’ -The State Department’s First Persian-Language Spokesperson Alan Eyre Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

20,713 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio says MAJOR PROGRESS has been made with Iran, and GREAT NEWS could be coming soon on the Strait of Hormuz LFG! 🔥 Rubio is dealing overseas, working hard! "Maybe more news coming out a little bit later today on this topic. Some progress has been made, significant progress, although not final progress has been made." "The goal here ultimately, the ultimate goals that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon." "The President has been clear about that. They will never possess a nuclear weapon, certainly not as long as Donald Trump is President of the United States. Related to that is this issue of the Straits." "The problem is going to be solved one way or the other. We've made some progress over the last 48 hours working with our partners in the Gulf region on an outline that could ultimately, if it succeeds, leave us not just with a completely open Straits, and I mean open Straits without tolls." "And with addressing some of the key things that underpin what has been Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions in the past." "So we think we've made some progress on the outline of something that, if it works, could give us that outcome. Obviously that will require full Iranian acceptance and then compliance. And it will require some future work on negotiating the details."
2:41

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio says MAJOR PROGRESS has been made with Iran, and GREAT NEWS could be coming soon on the Strait of Hormuz LFG! 🔥 Rubio is dealing overseas, working hard! "Maybe more news coming out a little bit later today on this topic. Some progress has been made, significant progress, although not final progress has been made." "The goal here ultimately, the ultimate goals that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon." "The President has been clear about that. They will never possess a nuclear weapon, certainly not as long as Donald Trump is President of the United States. Related to that is this issue of the Straits." "The problem is going to be solved one way or the other. We've made some progress over the last 48 hours working with our partners in the Gulf region on an outline that could ultimately, if it succeeds, leave us not just with a completely open Straits, and I mean open Straits without tolls." "And with addressing some of the key things that underpin what has been Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions in the past." "So we think we've made some progress on the outline of something that, if it works, could give us that outcome. Obviously that will require full Iranian acceptance and then compliance. And it will require some future work on negotiating the details."

Eric Daugherty

47,611 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. Studying Nuclear Strike On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain Facility, B61-11 Could Be An Option An Israeli government source claims Washington has studied using one or two tactical nuclear weapons against Iran’s deeply buried Atomic Energy Organization facility at Pickaxe Mountain. The reported studies allegedly began in early April, examining whether a nuclear weapon could destroy the hardened underground site. If the U.S. pursued such an option, the B61-11 earth penetrating nuclear bomb could potentially be considered because it was designed for hardened underground targets. No final decision has reportedly been made, and there is no public confirmation that the B61-11 is being considered. If true, this would represent an extraordinary escalation in the U.S. Iran confrontation. The claim comes from an anonymous Israeli government source and has not been independently verified.
0:40

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. Studying Nuclear Strike On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain Facility, B61-11 Could Be An Option An Israeli government source claims Washington has studied using one or two tactical nuclear weapons against Iran’s deeply buried Atomic Energy Organization facility at Pickaxe Mountain. The reported studies allegedly began in early April, examining whether a nuclear weapon could destroy the hardened underground site. If the U.S. pursued such an option, the B61-11 earth penetrating nuclear bomb could potentially be considered because it was designed for hardened underground targets. No final decision has reportedly been made, and there is no public confirmation that the B61-11 is being considered. If true, this would represent an extraordinary escalation in the U.S. Iran confrontation. The claim comes from an anonymous Israeli government source and has not been independently verified.

War Radar

45,290 просмотров • 15 дней назад

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST TOLD POPE LEO: "I'm all ABOUT the Gospel. I'm all about it as much as anybody can be!" "I want them to preach the gospel. But I also know that you cannot let a certain country, which is a very mean-spirited country, have a nuclear weapon." "If they did, they would use it, and I think they'd use it quickly, and they would kill many millions of people." "So, you know, the Pope could disagree with me on that, but certainly we're allowed to have that." "I can't allow, as President of the United States of America, I can't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon." "And here's the story. They won't have. They've already agreed not to have. That's good news, and I think the Pope will be very happy."
0:45

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST TOLD POPE LEO: "I'm all ABOUT the Gospel. I'm all about it as much as anybody can be!" "I want them to preach the gospel. But I also know that you cannot let a certain country, which is a very mean-spirited country, have a nuclear weapon." "If they did, they would use it, and I think they'd use it quickly, and they would kill many millions of people." "So, you know, the Pope could disagree with me on that, but certainly we're allowed to have that." "I can't allow, as President of the United States of America, I can't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon." "And here's the story. They won't have. They've already agreed not to have. That's good news, and I think the Pope will be very happy."

Eric Daugherty

144,696 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад