Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇨🇳🇺🇸 China’s Shift Toward Direct Confrontation: A New Diplomatic Strategy Against Trump’s Lies Traditionally, Chinese culture values grace, restraint, and saving face in public. Even in the face of grave insults, China often opts for moderation rather than escalation, believing that maintaining composure reflects maturity and dignity. This cultural...

OopsGuess's profile picture

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

47,684 subscribers

65,828 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 profil fotoğrafı
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1 yıl önce

Addendum:

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 profil fotoğrafı
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1 yıl önce

Why It’s Impossible That Xi Told Trump “The Virus Would Disappear in Summer” On February 7, 2020, China was at the darkest hour of the COVID-19 crisis. That very day, Dr. Li Wenliang passed away, sparking an unprecedented wave of grief and anger across Chinese social media. Wuhan reported over 20,000 confirmed cases, with 1,985 new infections and 67 deaths within a single day. Hospitals were overwhelmed beyond capacity; even temporary facilities like Fangcang shelter hospitals had not yet been fully established. It was a time of uncertainty and chaos. No one in China, not even the top leadership, could have predicted whether the outbreak could be controlled at all. In this context, the idea that Xi Jinping could have assured Trump that “the virus would go away in the summer” is completely absurd. It is unimaginable that any responsible Chinese official, seeing the desperate situation firsthand, would make such a reckless and baseless promise. If anything, Trump’s narrative reflects his own wishful thinking, not any realistic message from China. Attempting to backtrack and pin his false optimism on Xi not only insults the intelligence of observers but also disrespects the immense suffering endured by Wuhan and all of China at that time. The timeline itself proves it: February 7 was still a day of tragedy, not triumph.

The Washington Post profil fotoğrafı
The Washington Post1 yıl önce

Here’s what could get more expensive with Trump’s new tariffs.

Bevin Chu 朱炳文 profil fotoğrafı
Bevin Chu 朱炳文1 yıl önce

Dear Corrine, You have penned a MUST READ POST.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 profil fotoğrafı
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1 yıl önce

I’m so touched by your words, Bevin. Thank you for your encouragement and kindness!😊

Martin Chew profil fotoğrafı
Martin Chew1 yıl önce

The West relies heavily on propaganda to influence public opinion in their hemisphere and throughout the world. Spreading false narratives is part of their arsenal of psychological warfare against China.

东方神秘大国.擒苍 profil fotoğrafı
东方神秘大国.擒苍1 yıl önce

I find that Americans and Indians are becoming more and more alike, lying, warlike, and if India's national strength is equal to that of the United States, India is the enhanced version of the American. They don't seem to understand what civilization is.🤔

Space Cadet profil fotoğrafı
Space Cadet1 yıl önce

Our famously free press isn’t going to confront Trump. Better to let China do it.

Jean-Noël profil fotoğrafı
Jean-Noël1 yıl önce

Good for China. Trump is a pathological liar with no ethics whatsover. Hitting back hard to his lies is the only way forward

Paki Monkey profil fotoğrafı
Paki Monkey1 yıl önce

China will soon lean that the same exact philosophy will need to be applied in proxy wars! ZIOUSA will continue to cause issues all around china. ZIOUSA Only LISTENS TO BRUTE FORCE

Tom profil fotoğrafı
Tom1 yıl önce

The US has always been on the offensive, knowing that if they lose, they can simply retreat safely and prepare for another attack without facing any punishment. It's time to show them that their way of doing things no longer works in today's world

Benzer Videolar

China issued a stern warning to Trump over U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and potential talks with Taiwanese separatists, and suspended planned visits by U.S. military personnel to China’s Ministry of National Defense. Trump’s performative impulse is back. He seems to believe Taiwan is just another tool he can use to gain diplomatic attention. But China is not a reality show audience. China’s position is clear, consistent, and disciplined: No official exchanges between the U.S. and China’s Taiwan region. No arms sales to Taiwan. No encouragement of “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. No playing with the most sensitive issue in China-U.S. relations. Trump likes spectacle. He likes leverage. He likes turning every issue into a personal performance. But Taiwan is not a prop. It is not a bargaining chip for campaign theater. And it is certainly not a stage for Washington to act out its imperial nostalgia. China is a civilization with discipline. It can give Trump ceremony when ceremony serves strategy. But on sovereignty, there is no stagecraft. Only red lines.
0:47

China issued a stern warning to Trump over U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and potential talks with Taiwanese separatists, and suspended planned visits by U.S. military personnel to China’s Ministry of National Defense. Trump’s performative impulse is back. He seems to believe Taiwan is just another tool he can use to gain diplomatic attention. But China is not a reality show audience. China’s position is clear, consistent, and disciplined: No official exchanges between the U.S. and China’s Taiwan region. No arms sales to Taiwan. No encouragement of “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. No playing with the most sensitive issue in China-U.S. relations. Trump likes spectacle. He likes leverage. He likes turning every issue into a personal performance. But Taiwan is not a prop. It is not a bargaining chip for campaign theater. And it is certainly not a stage for Washington to act out its imperial nostalgia. China is a civilization with discipline. It can give Trump ceremony when ceremony serves strategy. But on sovereignty, there is no stagecraft. Only red lines.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,057 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.
0:26

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.

The SCIF

44,639 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇨🇳🇷🇺 "CHINA BACKED RUSSIA FROM DAY ONE AND IS STILL PROTECTING ITS INTERESTS" China keeps showing up right beside Russia whenever the U.S. tries to move the peace talks forward, and it raises a pretty obvious question about what Beijing is really doing. Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says China is not stepping in to end the war. She believes Beijing is acting like a quiet monitor, watching how Russia adjusts its message toward Washington and making sure nothing shifts without China seeing it first. Stefanishyna points out that China backed Russia from the beginning with parts, cash, and investment, and now wants to stay close in case Putin changes the narrative for the Americans. In her view, China is protecting its own strategic position more than anything else. "China has its own dialogue with Russia, with the U.S., and with European allies. It makes perfect sense that the Chinese representative is in Moscow at the same time as the American delegation. When the full scale invasion started, it was China who backed Russia with components, financial flows, and investments. Putin and Xi Jinping sealed this thousand year historical partnership."
1:50

🇨🇳🇷🇺 "CHINA BACKED RUSSIA FROM DAY ONE AND IS STILL PROTECTING ITS INTERESTS" China keeps showing up right beside Russia whenever the U.S. tries to move the peace talks forward, and it raises a pretty obvious question about what Beijing is really doing. Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says China is not stepping in to end the war. She believes Beijing is acting like a quiet monitor, watching how Russia adjusts its message toward Washington and making sure nothing shifts without China seeing it first. Stefanishyna points out that China backed Russia from the beginning with parts, cash, and investment, and now wants to stay close in case Putin changes the narrative for the Americans. In her view, China is protecting its own strategic position more than anything else. "China has its own dialogue with Russia, with the U.S., and with European allies. It makes perfect sense that the Chinese representative is in Moscow at the same time as the American delegation. When the full scale invasion started, it was China who backed Russia with components, financial flows, and investments. Putin and Xi Jinping sealed this thousand year historical partnership."

Mario Nawfal

56,544 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.
0:52

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

26,200 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.
0:26

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

VERY interesting 👀 Trump once again calls out NATO for not willing to help with the Strait of Hormuz. Then Trump calls on Japan and CHINA to help out, since they are the ones who use it most. If Trump can get China to help, that would be COLOSSAL! The optics would be perfect. If China helps, that would solidify that this operation with Iran had global support, even from our perceived geopolitical adversaries, like China. It would confirm that the Iranian regime was a threat to the world, and Trump was right to destroy them. It also opens the door to normalized relations with China, and proves that NATO are not actually the allies they pretend to be. It adds validity to my hypothesis that we are witnessing a shift in the global order and alliances. If China helps the US and NATO doesn’t, the entire geopolitical landscape will be turned on its head. I think this operation in Iran is about much more than just destroying the savage Iranian regime. I think we are witnessing something much bigger. I think we are witnessing a shift in the global power structure.
1:10

VERY interesting 👀 Trump once again calls out NATO for not willing to help with the Strait of Hormuz. Then Trump calls on Japan and CHINA to help out, since they are the ones who use it most. If Trump can get China to help, that would be COLOSSAL! The optics would be perfect. If China helps, that would solidify that this operation with Iran had global support, even from our perceived geopolitical adversaries, like China. It would confirm that the Iranian regime was a threat to the world, and Trump was right to destroy them. It also opens the door to normalized relations with China, and proves that NATO are not actually the allies they pretend to be. It adds validity to my hypothesis that we are witnessing a shift in the global order and alliances. If China helps the US and NATO doesn’t, the entire geopolitical landscape will be turned on its head. I think this operation in Iran is about much more than just destroying the savage Iranian regime. I think we are witnessing something much bigger. I think we are witnessing a shift in the global power structure.

Clandestine

186,161 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇨🇳🇺🇸Iran Isn't the Enemy - It's the Battlefield in a U.S.-China Proxy War: President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces intercepted an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, the M/V Touska, which was allegedly carrying what he described as “gifts from China” intended to restock Iran’s military. Trump appeared surprised by the contents of the Chinese cargo bound for Iran. It seems he believed he had an understanding with Chinese President Xi Jinping that China would not supply weapons or military-related materials to Iran. While Trump referred to the shipment as “gifts” from China, the cargo is likely composed of dual-use items that could support Iran’s weapons programs, missile production, or broader military sustainment. Many observers are now asking why China would send such components to Iran at this time. Doesn’t Beijing want the conflict to end? The answer is yes - but only on its own terms. China wants the fighting to stop provided the current Iranian regime remains in power. A significantly weakened Iran would not serve Chinese interests. Iran serves as a strategic node in China’s Belt and Road Initiative and acts as an important counterweight to U.S. influence in the Middle East and South Asia. In my view, the conflict has evolved into a proxy war between the United States and China.
0:25

🇨🇳🇺🇸Iran Isn't the Enemy - It's the Battlefield in a U.S.-China Proxy War: President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces intercepted an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, the M/V Touska, which was allegedly carrying what he described as “gifts from China” intended to restock Iran’s military. Trump appeared surprised by the contents of the Chinese cargo bound for Iran. It seems he believed he had an understanding with Chinese President Xi Jinping that China would not supply weapons or military-related materials to Iran. While Trump referred to the shipment as “gifts” from China, the cargo is likely composed of dual-use items that could support Iran’s weapons programs, missile production, or broader military sustainment. Many observers are now asking why China would send such components to Iran at this time. Doesn’t Beijing want the conflict to end? The answer is yes - but only on its own terms. China wants the fighting to stop provided the current Iranian regime remains in power. A significantly weakened Iran would not serve Chinese interests. Iran serves as a strategic node in China’s Belt and Road Initiative and acts as an important counterweight to U.S. influence in the Middle East and South Asia. In my view, the conflict has evolved into a proxy war between the United States and China.

Global Strategy

20,269 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇻🇪🇺🇸🇨🇳 Several things people are seeing now: • Maduro was kidnapped by the US military in a transnational operation • The US is threatening Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba • Several countries are showing a tendency towards nuclear self-defense. These all point to a core fact: The US is returning to "global intimidation-based unilateralism" rather than traditional hegemony. Traditional Hegemony: • Maintaining order, controlling rules, managing conflict Trump-style Hegemony: • Destroying rules, using force, creating fear This will lead to a global outcome: Every country is asking: When will China intervene? Because: • Russia's own wars have been extremely costly. • Europe is a vassal system and cannot act independently. • Among the G20, only China can rival the US in terms of power. China Now Faces a Strategic Crossroads Route 1: Traditional Diplomacy — Non-Intervention Advantages: ✔ Avoids entanglement in direct conflicts ✔ Maintains internal development and strategic focus ✔ Denies the U.S. a justification to rally allies against China Disadvantages: ✘ Global fear of the U.S. will deepen ✘ Developing countries may question China’s credibility as a stabilizer ✘ The resulting power vacuum will be filled by U.S. coercion ✘ China’s silence may be mistaken for weakness This is the path China knows best, but the world may no longer allow it. Route 2: Limited Security Commitment — The Quasi-Alliance Model Without forming formal alliances, China signals that if countries like Venezuela, Iran, Pakistan, or Brazil are subjected to illegal U.S. military operations, it will offer economic, diplomatic, and intelligence support. Think: the “ambiguous protection” the U.S. extended during early Cold War years. Advantages: ✔ Strengthens China’s position in the Global South ✔ Discourages U.S. adventurism against weaker states ✔ Raises the cost of unilateral U.S. action Disadvantages: ✘ Risk of being dragged into proxy wars ✘ Fuels the “China threat” narrative ✘ Requires a transformation of China’s diplomatic machinery Route 3: Rewriting the International Order This is what many nations quietly hope for—China stepping up as an architect of a post-hegemonic world. Key elements: • Launching a high-level global initiative beyond the BRI • Establishing a multipolar security framework • Offering alternatives to biased international arbitration • Publicly opposing U.S. military abductions, extraterritorial arrests, and unilateral sanctions • Building a long-term anti-hegemony alignment bloc Advantages: ✔ Dozens of Global South countries will openly rally behind China ✔ The deterrent aura of U.S. power is fading ✔ China will be recognized as a true global power, not just an economic one Disadvantages: ✘ Essentially triggers Cold War 2.0 ✘ U.S. hostility will escalate dramatically ✘ Demands tremendous economic, technological, and strategic capacity This is the hardest path, and the one China hoped to delay. But delay may no longer be an option. Conclusion: Trump’s doctrine of global intimidation is not just reshaping world politics, it’s forcing China to assume global leadership earlier than planned. China’s original trajectory was: “Develop → Accumulate → Redevelop → Gradually influence the world.” Trump’s trajectory is: “Destroy → Kidnap → Intimidate → Escalate.” And now, many nations are asking themselves: “If it’s Venezuela today, will it be me tomorrow?” This rising panic is transforming into pressure. China has no intention of replacing the United States, but if the US only instigates wars, panic, and nuclear motivations, then the world will sooner or later force China to assume the responsibility of “order rebuilding.” The most absurd thing is that those countries that once called China a “dictator” now hope that China will become a responsible empire. Above all, China aims to avoid being thrust prematurely into a destabilized international environment in which smaller states resort to nuclear deterrence as their only guarantee of survival.
15:05

🇻🇪🇺🇸🇨🇳 Several things people are seeing now: • Maduro was kidnapped by the US military in a transnational operation • The US is threatening Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba • Several countries are showing a tendency towards nuclear self-defense. These all point to a core fact: The US is returning to "global intimidation-based unilateralism" rather than traditional hegemony. Traditional Hegemony: • Maintaining order, controlling rules, managing conflict Trump-style Hegemony: • Destroying rules, using force, creating fear This will lead to a global outcome: Every country is asking: When will China intervene? Because: • Russia's own wars have been extremely costly. • Europe is a vassal system and cannot act independently. • Among the G20, only China can rival the US in terms of power. China Now Faces a Strategic Crossroads Route 1: Traditional Diplomacy — Non-Intervention Advantages: ✔ Avoids entanglement in direct conflicts ✔ Maintains internal development and strategic focus ✔ Denies the U.S. a justification to rally allies against China Disadvantages: ✘ Global fear of the U.S. will deepen ✘ Developing countries may question China’s credibility as a stabilizer ✘ The resulting power vacuum will be filled by U.S. coercion ✘ China’s silence may be mistaken for weakness This is the path China knows best, but the world may no longer allow it. Route 2: Limited Security Commitment — The Quasi-Alliance Model Without forming formal alliances, China signals that if countries like Venezuela, Iran, Pakistan, or Brazil are subjected to illegal U.S. military operations, it will offer economic, diplomatic, and intelligence support. Think: the “ambiguous protection” the U.S. extended during early Cold War years. Advantages: ✔ Strengthens China’s position in the Global South ✔ Discourages U.S. adventurism against weaker states ✔ Raises the cost of unilateral U.S. action Disadvantages: ✘ Risk of being dragged into proxy wars ✘ Fuels the “China threat” narrative ✘ Requires a transformation of China’s diplomatic machinery Route 3: Rewriting the International Order This is what many nations quietly hope for—China stepping up as an architect of a post-hegemonic world. Key elements: • Launching a high-level global initiative beyond the BRI • Establishing a multipolar security framework • Offering alternatives to biased international arbitration • Publicly opposing U.S. military abductions, extraterritorial arrests, and unilateral sanctions • Building a long-term anti-hegemony alignment bloc Advantages: ✔ Dozens of Global South countries will openly rally behind China ✔ The deterrent aura of U.S. power is fading ✔ China will be recognized as a true global power, not just an economic one Disadvantages: ✘ Essentially triggers Cold War 2.0 ✘ U.S. hostility will escalate dramatically ✘ Demands tremendous economic, technological, and strategic capacity This is the hardest path, and the one China hoped to delay. But delay may no longer be an option. Conclusion: Trump’s doctrine of global intimidation is not just reshaping world politics, it’s forcing China to assume global leadership earlier than planned. China’s original trajectory was: “Develop → Accumulate → Redevelop → Gradually influence the world.” Trump’s trajectory is: “Destroy → Kidnap → Intimidate → Escalate.” And now, many nations are asking themselves: “If it’s Venezuela today, will it be me tomorrow?” This rising panic is transforming into pressure. China has no intention of replacing the United States, but if the US only instigates wars, panic, and nuclear motivations, then the world will sooner or later force China to assume the responsibility of “order rebuilding.” The most absurd thing is that those countries that once called China a “dictator” now hope that China will become a responsible empire. Above all, China aims to avoid being thrust prematurely into a destabilized international environment in which smaller states resort to nuclear deterrence as their only guarantee of survival.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

304,159 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.
0:44

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,294 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

China directly exposed Washington’s hypocrisy on press freedom — and the efforts and sacrifices Chinese journalists have made under America’s so-called “free press” system. The background is simple. A New York Times reporter based in Beijing went to Taiwan, interviewed Lai Ching-te, called him “president,” and referred to Taiwan as a “country.” That crossed Beijing’s red line. China had tolerated years of hostile, ideologically biased reporting from her. But this was no longer journalism. It was a direct violation of China’s sovereignty framework. So China revoked her visa. Then Washington retaliated by canceling the visa of a Xinhua journalist who was simply doing normal reporting in the U.S. and had violated no American law. And now the U.S. wants to lecture China about “press freedom” and “reciprocity.” Please. In America, Chinese media are labeled “foreign agents” or “foreign missions.” Chinese journalists face visa delays, restrictions, and expulsions. Some can barely even ask questions at White House briefings. But when China enforces its own red lines, Washington suddenly discovers “freedom of speech.” This is not press freedom. It is a monopoly of rights disguised as press freedom. The U.S. wants American reporters to enjoy political immunity in China, while Chinese reporters are treated like hostile operatives in America. Once again, America’s colonial double standards remain repulsive — even when dressed up as democracy.
1:04

China directly exposed Washington’s hypocrisy on press freedom — and the efforts and sacrifices Chinese journalists have made under America’s so-called “free press” system. The background is simple. A New York Times reporter based in Beijing went to Taiwan, interviewed Lai Ching-te, called him “president,” and referred to Taiwan as a “country.” That crossed Beijing’s red line. China had tolerated years of hostile, ideologically biased reporting from her. But this was no longer journalism. It was a direct violation of China’s sovereignty framework. So China revoked her visa. Then Washington retaliated by canceling the visa of a Xinhua journalist who was simply doing normal reporting in the U.S. and had violated no American law. And now the U.S. wants to lecture China about “press freedom” and “reciprocity.” Please. In America, Chinese media are labeled “foreign agents” or “foreign missions.” Chinese journalists face visa delays, restrictions, and expulsions. Some can barely even ask questions at White House briefings. But when China enforces its own red lines, Washington suddenly discovers “freedom of speech.” This is not press freedom. It is a monopoly of rights disguised as press freedom. The U.S. wants American reporters to enjoy political immunity in China, while Chinese reporters are treated like hostile operatives in America. Once again, America’s colonial double standards remain repulsive — even when dressed up as democracy.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,519 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis just dropped some hard truths about the real reason behind the 🇺🇸U.S.-🇨🇳China trade war. And no, it’s not about “fair trade” — it’s about survival. 🧵 1/ The U.S. doesn’t fear China because of “cheap labor” or “IP theft.” What it truly fears is China’s capacity to undermine the U.S.-led global financial order — the very system that allows America to print dollars and buy the world. 2/ Wall Street’s aging financial architecture is losing its grip. It can’t control crypto flows. It can’t keep up with new financial ecosystems. China — with its digital yuan, vast industrial base, and rising global influence — is the first real threat to this system. 3/ Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” were never about balancing trade. They were a desperate attempt to slow down China’s rise and protect the dollar system from collapse. Because if China succeeds, the U.S. loses its magic weapon: monetary dominance. 4/ Today, Trump is laser-focused on America’s financial core: • The Treasury bond market (America’s lifeline) • The stock market (America’s wallet) Both are fragile. And any external pressure could trigger a chain reaction. 5/ The U.S. is now panicking over who’s selling off U.S. Treasuries. China? Japan? Others? Trump reportedly wants to punish any surplus country that dumps Treasuries — with tariffs, of course. This is not about trade. It’s about a dying empire trying to stop the bleeding. 6/ In short, America is no longer confident in its own financial fortress. And China is no longer playing by the old rules. This isn’t just a trade war — it’s a war for the future of global finance.
9:58

🚨 Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis just dropped some hard truths about the real reason behind the 🇺🇸U.S.-🇨🇳China trade war. And no, it’s not about “fair trade” — it’s about survival. 🧵 1/ The U.S. doesn’t fear China because of “cheap labor” or “IP theft.” What it truly fears is China’s capacity to undermine the U.S.-led global financial order — the very system that allows America to print dollars and buy the world. 2/ Wall Street’s aging financial architecture is losing its grip. It can’t control crypto flows. It can’t keep up with new financial ecosystems. China — with its digital yuan, vast industrial base, and rising global influence — is the first real threat to this system. 3/ Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” were never about balancing trade. They were a desperate attempt to slow down China’s rise and protect the dollar system from collapse. Because if China succeeds, the U.S. loses its magic weapon: monetary dominance. 4/ Today, Trump is laser-focused on America’s financial core: • The Treasury bond market (America’s lifeline) • The stock market (America’s wallet) Both are fragile. And any external pressure could trigger a chain reaction. 5/ The U.S. is now panicking over who’s selling off U.S. Treasuries. China? Japan? Others? Trump reportedly wants to punish any surplus country that dumps Treasuries — with tariffs, of course. This is not about trade. It’s about a dying empire trying to stop the bleeding. 6/ In short, America is no longer confident in its own financial fortress. And China is no longer playing by the old rules. This isn’t just a trade war — it’s a war for the future of global finance.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

678,141 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

China’s response to Trump’s election-interference accusations was almost contemptuously calm: fabricated accusations. no factual basis. no interest in interfering. stop dragging China into your elections. stop projecting your own habit of interfering in other countries’ internal affairs onto China. Trump has used this trick before. During COVID, he smeared China, turned a public-health disaster into a “China virus” campaign, and used anti-China hysteria to bury America’s own catastrophic failure — over one million dead, and it was Beijing’s fault. Now he is doing it again. Polls collapsing. MAGA furious over another Middle East quagmire. Allies alienated by his tariff war. America’s global image losing to China. Domestic politics rotting from the inside. So what does he do? Blame China for American elections. Again. The funniest part is that even America’s most anti-China media are not buying it this time. The documents do not support his performance. The intelligence community did not even agree with his claims. The Atlantic basically called it paranoid nonsense. The New York Times openly noted that voter data cannot manipulate votes. At this point, China’s response was not even an explanation. It was boredom. Because a civilization does not need to audition in a clown’s campaign speech.
1:24

China’s response to Trump’s election-interference accusations was almost contemptuously calm: fabricated accusations. no factual basis. no interest in interfering. stop dragging China into your elections. stop projecting your own habit of interfering in other countries’ internal affairs onto China. Trump has used this trick before. During COVID, he smeared China, turned a public-health disaster into a “China virus” campaign, and used anti-China hysteria to bury America’s own catastrophic failure — over one million dead, and it was Beijing’s fault. Now he is doing it again. Polls collapsing. MAGA furious over another Middle East quagmire. Allies alienated by his tariff war. America’s global image losing to China. Domestic politics rotting from the inside. So what does he do? Blame China for American elections. Again. The funniest part is that even America’s most anti-China media are not buying it this time. The documents do not support his performance. The intelligence community did not even agree with his claims. The Atlantic basically called it paranoid nonsense. The New York Times openly noted that voter data cannot manipulate votes. At this point, China’s response was not even an explanation. It was boredom. Because a civilization does not need to audition in a clown’s campaign speech.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,014 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.
1:27

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

98,111 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Trump Didn’t Bow to Xi. He Set a Geopolitical Trap and Putin’s Emergency Beijing Visit Reveals Trump’s Real China Strategy. Trump’s Beijing visit was never about “friendship” with Xi Jinping. It was about cold-blooded geopolitical strategy. In this video, I break down why Washington’s biggest fear is not China or Russia individually, but a fully united China-Russia alliance against the United States. I explain why Putin’s rushed Beijing trip right after the Trump-Xi summit may reveal deep distrust beneath the surface of the so-called “unlimited partnership” between Moscow and Beijing. We also examine the most important moment of the summit: Xi Jinping pressuring Trump on Taiwan and Trump responding with strategic silence that may have psychologically outmaneuvered Beijing. Finally, I explain why Taiwan is already independent in every meaningful sense of the word and why a Chinese invasion would likely become an economic and geopolitical disaster for Beijing.
14:32

Trump Didn’t Bow to Xi. He Set a Geopolitical Trap and Putin’s Emergency Beijing Visit Reveals Trump’s Real China Strategy. Trump’s Beijing visit was never about “friendship” with Xi Jinping. It was about cold-blooded geopolitical strategy. In this video, I break down why Washington’s biggest fear is not China or Russia individually, but a fully united China-Russia alliance against the United States. I explain why Putin’s rushed Beijing trip right after the Trump-Xi summit may reveal deep distrust beneath the surface of the so-called “unlimited partnership” between Moscow and Beijing. We also examine the most important moment of the summit: Xi Jinping pressuring Trump on Taiwan and Trump responding with strategic silence that may have psychologically outmaneuvered Beijing. Finally, I explain why Taiwan is already independent in every meaningful sense of the word and why a Chinese invasion would likely become an economic and geopolitical disaster for Beijing.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

88,834 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone with #US President Donald Trump — their first call after the Busan meeting. According to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the call was initiated by the US side. And at the very top of the agenda? The Taiwan question. Xi reiterated China's principled stance on the #Taiwan question, stressing that Taiwan's return to China is a key part of the postwar international order. Trump said the US acknowledges the significant role China played in the victory in World War II and understands the importance of the Taiwan question to China. The timing matters. With Japan hyping up a so-called "Taiwan contingency", this direct talk sends a powerful message — to Japan, and to separatists — that miscalculation will not be allowed. #MediaUnlocked
1:17

President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone with #US President Donald Trump — their first call after the Busan meeting. According to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the call was initiated by the US side. And at the very top of the agenda? The Taiwan question. Xi reiterated China's principled stance on the #Taiwan question, stressing that Taiwan's return to China is a key part of the postwar international order. Trump said the US acknowledges the significant role China played in the victory in World War II and understands the importance of the Taiwan question to China. The timing matters. With Japan hyping up a so-called "Taiwan contingency", this direct talk sends a powerful message — to Japan, and to separatists — that miscalculation will not be allowed. #MediaUnlocked

China Daily

41,659 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The last time Trump initiated a trade war against China, Covid-19 was purposely released from a lab in Wuhan, derailing his tariff plan and costing him the election. Now Trump is placing 104% tariffs on China in a position of extreme power and Fauci is simultaneously telling media that a new Covid virus 'might' be coming. Coincidence? The Timeline: August 2019: Trump claims he is the chosen one called to take on China on trade. He is winning handily. December 2019: China purposely released Covid-19 from the Wuhan lab. Anthony Fauci was directly connected to the Wuhan lab. The mainstream media uses every trick in the book to stop Donald Trump at nearly every turn. They made Fauci seem like a saint when he was the one who had literally helped create the pandemic. Aprile 2025: Anthony Fauci claims that there will likely be a new Covid virus right as Trump begins his tariff war that specifically targets China. Would the deep state attempt to release another virus or pandemic in response to Trump's bold and powerful strategy to finally make America great again and stop the decline?
2:23

The last time Trump initiated a trade war against China, Covid-19 was purposely released from a lab in Wuhan, derailing his tariff plan and costing him the election. Now Trump is placing 104% tariffs on China in a position of extreme power and Fauci is simultaneously telling media that a new Covid virus 'might' be coming. Coincidence? The Timeline: August 2019: Trump claims he is the chosen one called to take on China on trade. He is winning handily. December 2019: China purposely released Covid-19 from the Wuhan lab. Anthony Fauci was directly connected to the Wuhan lab. The mainstream media uses every trick in the book to stop Donald Trump at nearly every turn. They made Fauci seem like a saint when he was the one who had literally helped create the pandemic. Aprile 2025: Anthony Fauci claims that there will likely be a new Covid virus right as Trump begins his tariff war that specifically targets China. Would the deep state attempt to release another virus or pandemic in response to Trump's bold and powerful strategy to finally make America great again and stop the decline?

Green Lives Matter

535,507 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 President Trump’s Tariffs Broke China How can China respond to President Trump’s tariffs? —— Bissent says he don’t think China can. “The Chinese manufacturing system is like that old Disney movie, with the brooms carrying the buckets. That’s their business model… When you look at history, we (US) are the debtor nation, we have the trade deficits. The surplus nation (China) is in the weaker position” • The Dream scenario between the US and China is that China consumes more and manufactures less, while the US consumes less and manufactures more. “President Trump has broken their business model with their tariffs.” • Another way to think about it is this… —— if you take a small loan and can’t repay it, the bank can repossess whatever they want. —— However, if you take a big enough loan (US), you’re kind of in charge of the bank (China). “China has such a big deficit with us, they can’t survive without us.”
3:29

🚨 President Trump’s Tariffs Broke China How can China respond to President Trump’s tariffs? —— Bissent says he don’t think China can. “The Chinese manufacturing system is like that old Disney movie, with the brooms carrying the buckets. That’s their business model… When you look at history, we (US) are the debtor nation, we have the trade deficits. The surplus nation (China) is in the weaker position” • The Dream scenario between the US and China is that China consumes more and manufactures less, while the US consumes less and manufactures more. “President Trump has broken their business model with their tariffs.” • Another way to think about it is this… —— if you take a small loan and can’t repay it, the bank can repossess whatever they want. —— However, if you take a big enough loan (US), you’re kind of in charge of the bank (China). “China has such a big deficit with us, they can’t survive without us.”

MJTruthUltra

2,547,279 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

As President Trump heads to Beijing, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University — the cradle of China’s diplomats — said: “Everyone generally perceives that the US is indeed in decline — its influence is no longer what it once was. By contrast, China’s ability to shape international affairs and the evolution of the global situation is growing stronger, and its leadership on various issues in Sino-U.S. interactions is also increasing… We can clearly see the competitive dynamic in which Sino-U.S. power and influence are shifting — one rising as the other falls.” Textbook elite overconfidence. A perfect footnote to my NYT essay
0:39

As President Trump heads to Beijing, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University — the cradle of China’s diplomats — said: “Everyone generally perceives that the US is indeed in decline — its influence is no longer what it once was. By contrast, China’s ability to shape international affairs and the evolution of the global situation is growing stronger, and its leadership on various issues in Sino-U.S. interactions is also increasing… We can clearly see the competitive dynamic in which Sino-U.S. power and influence are shifting — one rising as the other falls.” Textbook elite overconfidence. A perfect footnote to my NYT essay

Yanzhong Huang

14,915 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce