Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about... COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

49,123 subscribers

26,200 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

19,670 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

When the Chinese Foreign Ministry was asked about Germany summoning the Chinese ambassador over media reports claiming China had trained Russian soldiers, its answer was blunt: the reports have no factual basis and are purely slanderous. Translation: China has no obligation to respond to every instance of German hysteria. China is not responsible for Europe’s habit of turning every insecurity into an accusation against Beijing. The funny part is that Germany has spent years destroying its own energy security, industrial competitiveness, and strategic autonomy over Ukraine. Now it wants to drag China into the psychological wreckage. But China refuses to follow the Western gaslighting script. If Germany wants to believe every anti-China rumor it reads, that is Germany’s problem. China is not a pacifier for Europe’s overgrown children.

When the Chinese Foreign Ministry was asked about Germany summoning the Chinese ambassador over media reports claiming China had trained Russian soldiers, its answer was blunt: the reports have no factual basis and are purely slanderous. Translation: China has no obligation to respond to every instance of German hysteria. China is not responsible for Europe’s habit of turning every insecurity into an accusation against Beijing. The funny part is that Germany has spent years destroying its own energy security, industrial competitiveness, and strategic autonomy over Ukraine. Now it wants to drag China into the psychological wreckage. But China refuses to follow the Western gaslighting script. If Germany wants to believe every anti-China rumor it reads, that is Germany’s problem. China is not a pacifier for Europe’s overgrown children.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

53,545 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In a speech commemorating former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Xi said: “In the late spring and early summer of 1989, a severe political disturbance took place in China.” The funniest myth is that “Tiananmen Square in 1989” is somehow “unspeakable” in China. It is spoken about. What Western anti-China discourse cannot tolerate is that China discusses its own history without adopting the political script the West wrote for it. If Beijing uses its own historical framing, that is called “censorship.” If Western institutions impose theirs, that is called “history.” There’s the trick. They do not demand that China remember 1989. They demand that China remember it in a way useful to them. China’s refusal to surrender narrative sovereignty is then repackaged as proof that the subject is “taboo.” The event is not the real taboo. China refusing to narrate itself through Western political needs is.

In a speech commemorating former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Xi said: “In the late spring and early summer of 1989, a severe political disturbance took place in China.” The funniest myth is that “Tiananmen Square in 1989” is somehow “unspeakable” in China. It is spoken about. What Western anti-China discourse cannot tolerate is that China discusses its own history without adopting the political script the West wrote for it. If Beijing uses its own historical framing, that is called “censorship.” If Western institutions impose theirs, that is called “history.” There’s the trick. They do not demand that China remember 1989. They demand that China remember it in a way useful to them. China’s refusal to surrender narrative sovereignty is then repackaged as proof that the subject is “taboo.” The event is not the real taboo. China refusing to narrate itself through Western political needs is.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

53,473 просмотров • 11 дней назад

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

76,662 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

98,111 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,354 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

Global Times

123,625 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Westerners keep asking: “Why are Chinese people so obsessed with every piece of their territory?” Let me answer this in a way they might finally understand. Because for China, land was never a trophy. It was never something you took when you were strong and gave up when you were tired. For thousands of years, our land was an inheritance. not from governments, but from ancestors. From farmers, from villages, from dynasties that rose, collapsed, and rebuilt themselves from ash. Every generation guarded the soil handed down by the last. Not because of nationalism, but because this is how a 5,000-year-old civilization stays alive. Meanwhile in the West, especially in settler states, land is just… negotiable. Stolen yesterday, abandoned tomorrow. I once heard an American say: “If California left, who cares? You can take it.” Of course he thinks that. His country is built on land taken by force, not land remembered through ancestors. You cannot lose what you never loved. China is different. We don’t guard territory because of politics. We guard it because we survived a century where others carved us apart, piece by piece, while calling it ‘civilization’ and ‘law’. We learned the lesson with blood: A nation that allows one inch to be taken, will eventually lose the right to stand. And here is the part Western moralists love to ignore: They cry for Palestine, claiming stolen land must be returned. But when China says Taiwan’s story is the same, suddenly “history doesn’t matter”. When Japan claims amnesia, they applaud. When China remembers, they panic. Why? Because a Japan that forgets is useful. A China that remembers is uncontrollable. And China today is—finally—at the stage where no one gets to tell us which parts of our history we are allowed to keep. This is not “aggression,” it is a civilization refusing to let its wounds be rewritten by former empires. So if you really want to understand why Taiwan is not negotiable, start here: For China, territory is memory. And memory is something we no longer allow others to steal.

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Westerners keep asking: “Why are Chinese people so obsessed with every piece of their territory?” Let me answer this in a way they might finally understand. Because for China, land was never a trophy. It was never something you took when you were strong and gave up when you were tired. For thousands of years, our land was an inheritance. not from governments, but from ancestors. From farmers, from villages, from dynasties that rose, collapsed, and rebuilt themselves from ash. Every generation guarded the soil handed down by the last. Not because of nationalism, but because this is how a 5,000-year-old civilization stays alive. Meanwhile in the West, especially in settler states, land is just… negotiable. Stolen yesterday, abandoned tomorrow. I once heard an American say: “If California left, who cares? You can take it.” Of course he thinks that. His country is built on land taken by force, not land remembered through ancestors. You cannot lose what you never loved. China is different. We don’t guard territory because of politics. We guard it because we survived a century where others carved us apart, piece by piece, while calling it ‘civilization’ and ‘law’. We learned the lesson with blood: A nation that allows one inch to be taken, will eventually lose the right to stand. And here is the part Western moralists love to ignore: They cry for Palestine, claiming stolen land must be returned. But when China says Taiwan’s story is the same, suddenly “history doesn’t matter”. When Japan claims amnesia, they applaud. When China remembers, they panic. Why? Because a Japan that forgets is useful. A China that remembers is uncontrollable. And China today is—finally—at the stage where no one gets to tell us which parts of our history we are allowed to keep. This is not “aggression,” it is a civilization refusing to let its wounds be rewritten by former empires. So if you really want to understand why Taiwan is not negotiable, start here: For China, territory is memory. And memory is something we no longer allow others to steal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

548,041 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Predictive History

35,185 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

85,739 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

There is an old Chinese intuition: those who have once been soaked by the rain learn, instinctively, to hold up an umbrella for others. Every generation in China carries this impulse. We don’t want to pass the Taiwan question to the next generation. We don’t want to pass the scars of Japanese invasion to the next generation. We don’t want to pass the humiliation of the Opium Wars to the next generation. We don’t want to pass down a wounded, resource-starved nation to the next generation. A civilization remembers its pain so that its children don’t have to repeat it. China isn’t afraid of Japan. China isn’t afraid of America. China is afraid of repeating history. History is not a video game to Chinese people. We remember it in names, in graves, in family stories whispered at dinner tables. So don’t mistake restraint for fear. What you see is the discipline of a civilization determined that its children will never inherit the same fire.

There is an old Chinese intuition: those who have once been soaked by the rain learn, instinctively, to hold up an umbrella for others. Every generation in China carries this impulse. We don’t want to pass the Taiwan question to the next generation. We don’t want to pass the scars of Japanese invasion to the next generation. We don’t want to pass the humiliation of the Opium Wars to the next generation. We don’t want to pass down a wounded, resource-starved nation to the next generation. A civilization remembers its pain so that its children don’t have to repeat it. China isn’t afraid of Japan. China isn’t afraid of America. China is afraid of repeating history. History is not a video game to Chinese people. We remember it in names, in graves, in family stories whispered at dinner tables. So don’t mistake restraint for fear. What you see is the discipline of a civilization determined that its children will never inherit the same fire.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

650,189 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,522 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇨🇳🇯🇵 The issue isn’t that Japan has extremists every country does. The issue is that in Japan, these individuals are openly tolerated, indulged, and even protected. They wave Nazi flags and the Rising Sun Flag, marching through public streets year after year, with police escorting them, year after year. The Japanese government pretends these are merely “marginal voices,” but if the same flags appeared on the streets of Germany, the entire EU would treat it as a national crisis. What lies behind this is not the madness of a few individuals, but a deeply ingrained civilizational hierarchy. For decades, the West has attempted to sculpt a “tamed Japan” as East Asia’s model student, a counterweight to China and a way to shape a regional hierarchy. So they never confront Japan’s atrocities in Asia: crimes fully comparable to those of Nazi Germany: massacres, looting, human experimentation, all documented in UN archives. Post-war Germany chose repentance, but Japan chose amnesia. China waived Japan’s war reparations, and Japan repaid that gesture by recasting itself as a victim, even slandering the very nation that lost 35 million lives to its invasion. This is why Chinese people consider Japan a generational enemy. Not out of hatred, but out of memory. A nation that refuses remorse, refuses history, and even fantasizes about reviving its wartime glory will always be a threat to the next generation of Asia. China is a civilization with five thousand years of memory. Our history is not forgotten, it is inherited. Japanese fascism will never be allowed a second life in Asia, that is a civilizational duty etched into the bones of every Chinese generation.

🇨🇳🇯🇵 The issue isn’t that Japan has extremists every country does. The issue is that in Japan, these individuals are openly tolerated, indulged, and even protected. They wave Nazi flags and the Rising Sun Flag, marching through public streets year after year, with police escorting them, year after year. The Japanese government pretends these are merely “marginal voices,” but if the same flags appeared on the streets of Germany, the entire EU would treat it as a national crisis. What lies behind this is not the madness of a few individuals, but a deeply ingrained civilizational hierarchy. For decades, the West has attempted to sculpt a “tamed Japan” as East Asia’s model student, a counterweight to China and a way to shape a regional hierarchy. So they never confront Japan’s atrocities in Asia: crimes fully comparable to those of Nazi Germany: massacres, looting, human experimentation, all documented in UN archives. Post-war Germany chose repentance, but Japan chose amnesia. China waived Japan’s war reparations, and Japan repaid that gesture by recasting itself as a victim, even slandering the very nation that lost 35 million lives to its invasion. This is why Chinese people consider Japan a generational enemy. Not out of hatred, but out of memory. A nation that refuses remorse, refuses history, and even fantasizes about reviving its wartime glory will always be a threat to the next generation of Asia. China is a civilization with five thousand years of memory. Our history is not forgotten, it is inherited. Japanese fascism will never be allowed a second life in Asia, that is a civilizational duty etched into the bones of every Chinese generation.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

201,224 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,546 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

Nury Vittachi

28,217 просмотров • 1 год назад

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.

Afshin Rattansi

380,783 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,767 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

60,822 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

Brian Berletic

103,132 просмотров • 1 месяц назад