Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Chinese billionaire & venture capitalist Eric Li explains why China🇨🇳 is winning the competition against the US🇺🇸: ‘In America, you can change the party but you can’t change the policies. In China🇨🇳, you cannot change the party, but you can change the policies.’ ‘China is a vibrant market economy...

263,563 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 32

Фото профиля Lieve
Lieve2 месяцев назад

That's how it should be if only the West was capable to learn. If you think you are already the greatest, the best you never listen to better Ideas.

Фото профиля Brandon A
Brandon A2 месяцев назад

It really isn't "changing parties" in America

Фото профиля Brenda Factor
Brenda Factor2 месяцев назад

@dana916 The difference between China and the United States: in China, Xi controls the Oligarchs, (Russia too) in the U.S. the Oligarchs control Trump. The former works better.

Фото профиля Pressburger Powell
Pressburger Powell2 месяцев назад

Yes. Deng on markets: “If they serve socialism they are socialist; if they serve capitalism, they’re capitalist.” Capital below or above government. Princeton & Northwestern scholars: Citizens have “little or no independent influence” on policy. In China? Channels allow change.

Фото профиля 🔥🔥🔥ABU FLAME🔥🔥🔥
🔥🔥🔥ABU FLAME🔥🔥🔥2 месяцев назад

That's true they actually execute people who embezzle or engage in money laundering

Фото профиля André
André2 месяцев назад

You know who also loves China? The WEF and Wall Street. They have sunce at least the 70s. Larry Fink, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Ray Dalio... the list goes on and on. "China is the new model"

Фото профиля Richard LZ
Richard LZ2 месяцев назад

Eric Li is actually correct since he himself is a white glove working for the politibro. Chinese politicians are vested in the country's economic operations, That is why China is more responsive to the market than the West, including the US.

Фото профиля Michael Baran
Michael Baran2 месяцев назад

Crony politics/business the undoing of the "west". As well as likely compromised election system. The fix?? That's a big one

Фото профиля San Miguel 🗡️
San Miguel 🗡️2 месяцев назад

😂😂😂 You must be a retarded to believe this Chinx 🇨🇳💀

Фото профиля Joe Mama
Joe Mama2 месяцев назад

It's a nice sound bite, but not true. You CAN change the policies in America. The process is slow and difficult by design. The point is that you don't want the government changing policies every 5 minutes, you want it to require building large consensus. Our problem is MONEY in politics corrupting the process. That is a real conundrum.

Фото профиля dr. msm مسم
dr. msm مسم2 месяцев назад

All correct, good points.

Фото профиля Ye Wenjie
Ye Wenjie2 месяцев назад

"Chinese Socialism is not Capitalism & you can change the policie"…🤣 BUT a state-led economy, a bureaucratic capitalist, a party-state system👉CCP dictatorship… "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely"

Фото профиля Brathwaithe Bonespurs Quackerbush IV
Brathwaithe Bonespurs Quackerbush IV1 месяц назад

🎯🎯🎯 Eric Li is an amazing guy! I always enjoy how he destroys America's myth of exceptionalism.

Фото профиля Punjabi Kouboi
Punjabi Kouboi2 месяцев назад

I am sure the Politboro can be corrupted just as easy as Congress.

Фото профиля Proud Black🌍
Proud Black🌍2 месяцев назад

Very right and deep analysis👌

Фото профиля Gérard Chin⭐⭐
Gérard Chin⭐⭐2 месяцев назад

Eric Li is Spot On 🎯

Фото профиля Prez
Prez2 месяцев назад

@Bobduff1 See China gets it

Фото профиля ☯️灵蛇之眼 ☯️
☯️灵蛇之眼 ☯️2 месяцев назад

@EKKoh3 美国的溃烂,源于权力被资本掌控,能出现这个漏洞,就是因为体制有漏洞。

Фото профиля hike4free
hike4free2 месяцев назад

China has a hybrid system, made by USA. They are Israel's top 2 trading partners.

Фото профиля China View
China View2 месяцев назад

美国两党轮流上台,却都要绑定华尔街、军工、能源财团的利益,选举捐款、游说制度锁死政策走向,换总统也改不了服务资本的底层逻辑。 中国坚持社会主义市场经济,市场活力充分释放,但资本永远置于公共治理框架之下,富豪财团无法左右顶层政策。遇到发展难题能灵活调整产业、民生、科技政策,长期规划连贯、改革落地高效,这正是中国能持续超越的核心优势。

Фото профиля ራስ ባሪያው Rass Bariaw
ራስ ባሪያው Rass Bariaw2 месяцев назад

.@solassefa one example

Фото профиля ivan
ivan2 месяцев назад

+ China hast around 300 mil. Poor Migrant workers which can be exploited by the KPCh....

Фото профиля YangYang_6L
YangYang_6L2 месяцев назад

这不是李开复,这是李世默

Фото профиля DrWho
DrWho2 месяцев назад

Googled it: "Is he a billionaire?" No, Eric Xun Li (the venture capitalist) is not a billionaire, but the identity confusion is common because major financial publications frequently profile a completely different Chinese tycoon named Eric Li who is a multi-billionaire.

Фото профиля Ferasaltu
Ferasaltu2 месяцев назад

as long as he runs party line, there are no policies, there are no rules but one, generate USD. everything else is bullshit.

Фото профиля 宝贝小陈
宝贝小陈2 месяцев назад

西方现在需要一个君王以及世袭制来帮助他们取得进步,最好是英国可以复辟

Фото профиля Sotheary
Sotheary2 месяцев назад

So now communists and the Chinese care what a billionaire has to say.

Фото профиля Justin Vest
Justin Vest2 месяцев назад

Parasitic billionaires in China, like parasitic billionaires in the USA, accumulated their immense wealth by exploiting domestic and foreign labor and ruthlessly assaulting the natural world which supports all life.

Фото профиля richard saw
richard saw2 месяцев назад

The ultimate dream of all capital is to pursue monopoly rather than free competition, because only in this way can capital maximize its profits. The CCP is the most severe father of capital,it prohibits monopoly in order to ensure the free competition mechanism of the market

Фото профиля Decebalus Tuta
Decebalus Tuta2 месяцев назад

in america you change the parties but you end up with the same jewish tribe policies...

Фото профиля D_H
D_H2 месяцев назад

@GeorgievSony He is Li ShiMo.

Фото профиля 💫 🇵🇸🕊️ #HumanRightsIsAMust 🕊️🇵🇸💫
💫 🇵🇸🕊️ #HumanRightsIsAMust 🕊️🇵🇸💫2 месяцев назад

One hoards money and strangle market competition (in violation of it’s own antitrust laws). The other is just the opposite. Their definition of capitalism is Oligarchy with very few exceptions.

Похожие видео

HOW CHINA IS DIFFERENT FORM THE AMERICA In a powerful exchange with the late investigative journalist John Pilger, venture capitalist, political scientist, and author Eric X. Li offered a framing that cuts through decades of Cold War rhetoric about democracy, capitalism, and power. Li draws a sharp distinction between political choice and policy power. In the United States, he argues, voters can rotate political parties endlessly, but the core policies rarely change. Why; because capital has captured the state. Billionaires, corporations, and financial interests shape policymaking regardless of who wins elections. Political authority, in practice, cannot discipline capital. Today, this plays out in plain sight. From Donald Trump bringing figures like Elon Musk into government orbit, hosting tech billionaires at the White House, offering tax breaks to corporations, and openly aligning foreign policy with business interests; to Democrats doing the same through different language. Barack Obama’s decision to bail out Wall Street after the 2008 financial collapse, instead of holding bankers accountable, remains a defining example. Different parties; same beneficiaries. The system, Li argues, is structurally rigged in favour of the one percent. China, by contrast, operates in reverse. The Communist Party is not electorally replaceable, but policies are. Over six decades, China has shifted from Maoist central planning to a market driven economy, lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty according to the World Bank, industrialised at historic speed, and repeatedly adjusted its development strategy. The party remained; the policies changed dramatically. Crucially, Li rejects the idea that China is capitalist. Yes, markets exist; but capital does not sit above the state. Billionaires cannot capture the politburo or dictate national policy. Capital operates, but it does not rule. Whether one agrees or not, Li’s argument poses a fundamental question; is democracy about how often you vote, or about who actually holds power; and who the system ultimately serves? VoxUmmah Venezuelanalysis Qiao Collective Progressive International Kawsachun News Orinoco Tribune @blkagendareport Soberanía: The Mexican Politics Podcast

Sovereign Media

54,643 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад