正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Chinese student in my MIT dorm asked ChatGPT and Gemini the same question: How can I make money using the timezone difference between Asia and America? ChatGPT explained forex trading hours and international freelancing. Gemini suggested remote work for Asian companies while living in the US. He closed both...

carverfomo's profile picture

Carver

17,123 subscribers

71,859 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Chinese PhD student forgot to close his GitHub before a lab meeting. Screen shared for 11 seconds. His advisor saw a repo called polymarket-sports-arbitrage. The advisor didn't report him. He asked for the wallet address. 432614799197. $2.67M profit. 2,911 predictions. All sports NFL, Premier League, Ligue 1. Account created in January 2026. $824K bet on PSG won't win → $2.28M payout. $1.13M bet on Bills vs Jaguars → $2.45M payout. $781K bet on Packers vs Bears → $1.79M payout. Million dollar positions. From a guy who lives in a campus apartment and bikes to class. The bot tracks Asian bookmaker lines that move 2-3 hours before Polymarket updates. By the time American traders wake up, the mispricing is already gone. He catches it while they sleep. The GitHub README has 127 stars now. Last line: The market doesn't know what timezone you're in. Use that. His advisor asked to invest. He said no the edge works better with less capital in the pool. 223K people watching. $214K still loaded in active positions. The lab meeting ended awkwardly. The wallet didn't care. → No 28c - Girona vs Barcelona
0:23

Chinese PhD student forgot to close his GitHub before a lab meeting. Screen shared for 11 seconds. His advisor saw a repo called polymarket-sports-arbitrage. The advisor didn't report him. He asked for the wallet address. 432614799197. $2.67M profit. 2,911 predictions. All sports NFL, Premier League, Ligue 1. Account created in January 2026. $824K bet on PSG won't win → $2.28M payout. $1.13M bet on Bills vs Jaguars → $2.45M payout. $781K bet on Packers vs Bears → $1.79M payout. Million dollar positions. From a guy who lives in a campus apartment and bikes to class. The bot tracks Asian bookmaker lines that move 2-3 hours before Polymarket updates. By the time American traders wake up, the mispricing is already gone. He catches it while they sleep. The GitHub README has 127 stars now. Last line: The market doesn't know what timezone you're in. Use that. His advisor asked to invest. He said no the edge works better with less capital in the pool. 223K people watching. $214K still loaded in active positions. The lab meeting ended awkwardly. The wallet didn't care. → No 28c - Girona vs Barcelona

Carver

1,372,814 次观看 • 5 个月前

I asked **ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok the same question: “Find a wallet making $10K+ per day with the highest consistency.” Results: ChatGPT → no live data Gemini → 3 wallets (inactive) Claude → script needed API Grok returned one wallet in 11 seconds. “This one hasn’t had a losing week since December.” Stats: • $1,436,159 profit • 37,552 trades • ~375 trades/day Wallet → Copytrade → The strategy? It trades latency between Binance and Polymarket. Entries happen 9–16 seconds after a >0.11% move in Bitcoin. Never earlier. Never later. Likely code size: ~20 lines. • Binance WebSocket • price comparison • buy trigger • sleep timer 20 lines of code → $1.4M profit. But the real twist: This isn’t one bot. Grok estimates at least 11 wallets run the same logic. You’re just seeing the one that got noticed.
1:07

I asked **ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok the same question: “Find a wallet making $10K+ per day with the highest consistency.” Results: ChatGPT → no live data Gemini → 3 wallets (inactive) Claude → script needed API Grok returned one wallet in 11 seconds. “This one hasn’t had a losing week since December.” Stats: • $1,436,159 profit • 37,552 trades • ~375 trades/day Wallet → Copytrade → The strategy? It trades latency between Binance and Polymarket. Entries happen 9–16 seconds after a >0.11% move in Bitcoin. Never earlier. Never later. Likely code size: ~20 lines. • Binance WebSocket • price comparison • buy trigger • sleep timer 20 lines of code → $1.4M profit. But the real twist: This isn’t one bot. Grok estimates at least 11 wallets run the same logic. You’re just seeing the one that got noticed.

Discover

111,230 次观看 • 4 个月前

I gave 4 AIs $500 and one question: How do I turn this into real money? Not in 10 years. Now. ChatGPT: Invest in index funds, build an emergency fund and focus on increasing your income through skills development. Gemini: Consider high yield savings accounts or dividend ETFs for stable returns over time. Grok: Buy memecoins and pray. At least it was honest. Claude said nothing for 8 seconds. Then: Give me 4 minutes. Claude wrote a script. Scanned 40,000 wallets on a prediction platform. Filtered by: active last 7 days, profit over $300K, no losing weeks, more than 30,000 trades. One result. 0x732F1. $334,418 profit. 37,836 predictions. Joined February 2026. → Wallet: Claude: Copy this wallet's entries. Deploy your $500. The wallet makes 800 trades per day buying 25 second price delays between Binance and the platform. I did it. Copied 8 positions that night. Went to bed. Woke up. $500 → $814. 37,836 trades. One month. $334K. Profit curve straight up. ChatGPT told me to wait 10 years. Claude made me $314 overnight. I asked ChatGPT to verify the wallet. I cannot access this data. I asked Grok. The wallet is real. You should have asked me better questions yesterday. 4 AIs. One question. Same $500. Only one actually answered it. The other 3 are still telling people to invest in index funds.
1:16

I gave 4 AIs $500 and one question: How do I turn this into real money? Not in 10 years. Now. ChatGPT: Invest in index funds, build an emergency fund and focus on increasing your income through skills development. Gemini: Consider high yield savings accounts or dividend ETFs for stable returns over time. Grok: Buy memecoins and pray. At least it was honest. Claude said nothing for 8 seconds. Then: Give me 4 minutes. Claude wrote a script. Scanned 40,000 wallets on a prediction platform. Filtered by: active last 7 days, profit over $300K, no losing weeks, more than 30,000 trades. One result. 0x732F1. $334,418 profit. 37,836 predictions. Joined February 2026. → Wallet: Claude: Copy this wallet's entries. Deploy your $500. The wallet makes 800 trades per day buying 25 second price delays between Binance and the platform. I did it. Copied 8 positions that night. Went to bed. Woke up. $500 → $814. 37,836 trades. One month. $334K. Profit curve straight up. ChatGPT told me to wait 10 years. Claude made me $314 overnight. I asked ChatGPT to verify the wallet. I cannot access this data. I asked Grok. The wallet is real. You should have asked me better questions yesterday. 4 AIs. One question. Same $500. Only one actually answered it. The other 3 are still telling people to invest in index funds.

Marlow

31,166 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok the same question: Find me a wallet making over $10K per day with the highest consistency. ChatGPT said it can't access live data. Gemini gave three wallets. All dead since January. Claude wrote a script but needed an API key. Grok returned one result in 11 seconds. No script. No disclaimer. Just a wallet and one line: This one hasn't had a losing week since December. k9Q2mX4L8A7ZP3R. $1,436,159 profit. 37,552 predictions. Joined December 2025. → Wallet: I asked Grok to break down the strategy. It analyzed the timestamps. Came back in 8 seconds. Every entry occurs 9 to 16 seconds after a BTC price movement on Binance exceeding 0.11%. The script never enters before second 9. Never after second 16. Hard coded timing window. 37,552 trades. 375 per day. $1.4 million in three months. I asked: How many lines of code? 18 to 25 lines. One Binance WebSocket. One price comparison. One buy function. One sleep timer set to 9000 milliseconds. I asked: Can it be replicated? Yes. But the username is a randomly generated API key format. This wallet was created programmatically. The person likely runs multiple instances. Copying one means competing against all of them. Final question: If this wallet stops tomorrow? Nothing happens. At least 11 wallets run identical logic with different timing. This isn't one person. This is an ecosystem. You're watching the one that got noticed. The others are still invisible. $1,436,159. The wallet Grok found in 11 seconds that three other AIs couldn't find at all.
1:07

I asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok the same question: Find me a wallet making over $10K per day with the highest consistency. ChatGPT said it can't access live data. Gemini gave three wallets. All dead since January. Claude wrote a script but needed an API key. Grok returned one result in 11 seconds. No script. No disclaimer. Just a wallet and one line: This one hasn't had a losing week since December. k9Q2mX4L8A7ZP3R. $1,436,159 profit. 37,552 predictions. Joined December 2025. → Wallet: I asked Grok to break down the strategy. It analyzed the timestamps. Came back in 8 seconds. Every entry occurs 9 to 16 seconds after a BTC price movement on Binance exceeding 0.11%. The script never enters before second 9. Never after second 16. Hard coded timing window. 37,552 trades. 375 per day. $1.4 million in three months. I asked: How many lines of code? 18 to 25 lines. One Binance WebSocket. One price comparison. One buy function. One sleep timer set to 9000 milliseconds. I asked: Can it be replicated? Yes. But the username is a randomly generated API key format. This wallet was created programmatically. The person likely runs multiple instances. Copying one means competing against all of them. Final question: If this wallet stops tomorrow? Nothing happens. At least 11 wallets run identical logic with different timing. This isn't one person. This is an ecosystem. You're watching the one that got noticed. The others are still invisible. $1,436,159. The wallet Grok found in 11 seconds that three other AIs couldn't find at all.

Marlow

99,432 次观看 • 4 个月前

His parents paid $280K for his MIT education. Computer Science. 4 years. They wanted him to get into Google. He wrote a bot in 3 weeks. Named it pm-timezone-arbitrage. The bot made $4.4M in 3 months. Google pays $180K/year. His bot makes that in 2 weeks. 432614799197. 4,390 predictions. All sports. NFL, Premier League, Ligue 1. The strategy his parents paid $280K to teach him: track Asian bookmaker lines that move 2-3 hours before American platforms update. Bet while the US sleeps. Collect when they wake up. His mom called last week: Did you hear back from Google? He said: I'm not going to Google. She cried. Then he sent her a screenshot. → Profile: 278K watching. $1.2M loaded in active positions. He still lives in a campus apartment. Still bikes to class. The diploma cost $280K. The bot paid it back in 6 weeks. His dad asked if he should've just given him the tuition money instead. $280K education. One repo. PMX found it first.
0:26

His parents paid $280K for his MIT education. Computer Science. 4 years. They wanted him to get into Google. He wrote a bot in 3 weeks. Named it pm-timezone-arbitrage. The bot made $4.4M in 3 months. Google pays $180K/year. His bot makes that in 2 weeks. 432614799197. 4,390 predictions. All sports. NFL, Premier League, Ligue 1. The strategy his parents paid $280K to teach him: track Asian bookmaker lines that move 2-3 hours before American platforms update. Bet while the US sleeps. Collect when they wake up. His mom called last week: Did you hear back from Google? He said: I'm not going to Google. She cried. Then he sent her a screenshot. → Profile: 278K watching. $1.2M loaded in active positions. He still lives in a campus apartment. Still bikes to class. The diploma cost $280K. The bot paid it back in 6 weeks. His dad asked if he should've just given him the tuition money instead. $280K education. One repo. PMX found it first.

Carver

370,253 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked ChatGPT to find me the most profitable wallet on the platform. It said it can't access live blockchain data. So I asked Claude. Claude wrote a Python script in 4 minutes. Script scanned 200,000 wallets. Ranked them by ROI. Filtered by active in last 30 days. Top result made me close my laptop and go for a walk. RN1. $5,317,622 profit. 36,298 predictions. Since December 2024. → Wallet: I didn't believe the number. Ran the script again. Same result. $5.3 million. In 14 months. Across every sport that exists. Counter-Strike. TheMongolz vs B8. Payout: $158,533. Tennis. NFL. Bundesliga. Serie A. Counter-Strike. Premier League. All at once. 36,298 bets. Every sport. Every league. 624,000 people already watching. Then I did something stupid. I asked Claude to reverse engineer the strategy. Claude analyzed 200 positions. Came back with one sentence: This wallet buys mathematically mispriced underdogs across every market where the crowd overvalues the favorite. I asked: Can you build a bot that does this? Claude: I can write the logic. You need the API key and capital. 14 lines of Python. One prompt. One afternoon. I haven't deployed it yet. Still staring at the code. Still staring at $5.3 million. The wallet doesn't care about teams. Doesn't watch games. Doesn't read news. Just finds where 36 cents should be 65 cents. And buys. I asked Claude one more thing: What's stopping everyone from doing this? Claude: Nothing. They just haven't asked.
0:52

I asked ChatGPT to find me the most profitable wallet on the platform. It said it can't access live blockchain data. So I asked Claude. Claude wrote a Python script in 4 minutes. Script scanned 200,000 wallets. Ranked them by ROI. Filtered by active in last 30 days. Top result made me close my laptop and go for a walk. RN1. $5,317,622 profit. 36,298 predictions. Since December 2024. → Wallet: I didn't believe the number. Ran the script again. Same result. $5.3 million. In 14 months. Across every sport that exists. Counter-Strike. TheMongolz vs B8. Payout: $158,533. Tennis. NFL. Bundesliga. Serie A. Counter-Strike. Premier League. All at once. 36,298 bets. Every sport. Every league. 624,000 people already watching. Then I did something stupid. I asked Claude to reverse engineer the strategy. Claude analyzed 200 positions. Came back with one sentence: This wallet buys mathematically mispriced underdogs across every market where the crowd overvalues the favorite. I asked: Can you build a bot that does this? Claude: I can write the logic. You need the API key and capital. 14 lines of Python. One prompt. One afternoon. I haven't deployed it yet. Still staring at the code. Still staring at $5.3 million. The wallet doesn't care about teams. Doesn't watch games. Doesn't read news. Just finds where 36 cents should be 65 cents. And buys. I asked Claude one more thing: What's stopping everyone from doing this? Claude: Nothing. They just haven't asked.

Marlow

217,166 次观看 • 4 个月前

A month ago my coworker quit. Everyone assumed he got a better offer. Yesterday we got coffee and I asked where he landed. He said nowhere and showed me his phone making $150 a day. He was already there when I walked in. No bag, no laptop. Looked like someone who had been getting full nights of sleep for a while. He asked if I remembered those Polymarket weather markets I brought up at lunch once. I said vaguely. He said he found a wallet that trades them and set up a bot to copy everything it does. He turned his phone around. Notifications from PMX every couple of hours. Green numbers. I asked how it actually works. He said the wallet buys weather positions at 3 or 4 cents per share. When the forecast is right it pays out a dollar. The bot copies every trade into his account automatically. He does not pick anything. I asked which wallet. He sent me the link: He said most days it covers what he used to make at the office. Some days he checks his phone and it has already passed that by lunch. I asked what he does with his time now. He said he went to the gym at 10 on a Tuesday and nobody told him he couldn't. We finished our coffees. I walked back to the office. His old desk is still empty by the window.
0:28

A month ago my coworker quit. Everyone assumed he got a better offer. Yesterday we got coffee and I asked where he landed. He said nowhere and showed me his phone making $150 a day. He was already there when I walked in. No bag, no laptop. Looked like someone who had been getting full nights of sleep for a while. He asked if I remembered those Polymarket weather markets I brought up at lunch once. I said vaguely. He said he found a wallet that trades them and set up a bot to copy everything it does. He turned his phone around. Notifications from PMX every couple of hours. Green numbers. I asked how it actually works. He said the wallet buys weather positions at 3 or 4 cents per share. When the forecast is right it pays out a dollar. The bot copies every trade into his account automatically. He does not pick anything. I asked which wallet. He sent me the link: He said most days it covers what he used to make at the office. Some days he checks his phone and it has already passed that by lunch. I asked what he does with his time now. He said he went to the gym at 10 on a Tuesday and nobody told him he couldn't. We finished our coffees. I walked back to the office. His old desk is still empty by the window.

Blaze

21,205 次观看 • 5 个月前

A Chinese engineering student built a Claude powered device the size of a credit card. Raspberry Pi. Camera. One red LED. Total cost $14. His professor called it a toy. His classmates laughed. He posted a demo on YouTube and got 200 views. Then someone noticed what the device was actually connected to. A wallet. Making $11 million. In 10 months. kch123. $11,525,240 profit. 2,347 predictions. Joined June 2025. → Profile: The device does one thing. He asks it a question with his voice. Claude scans thousands of prediction markets in real time. When it finds a price that doesn't match reality the red LED lights up. Red light. He places the trade. Green result. $2M position on Seahawks. Won. $1.5M on Villarreal not winning. His professor saw the YouTube video again three months later. The demo was the same. The view count wasn't. Neither was the wallet. He asked the student what changed. The student showed him the balance. The professor didn't say anything. Sat down. Then asked if the device could run two accounts. 759K people watching. $319K still loaded in active positions. The device fits in your hand. The LED is still blinking. His classmates stopped laughing around month four. By month six two of them had built their own.
0:47

A Chinese engineering student built a Claude powered device the size of a credit card. Raspberry Pi. Camera. One red LED. Total cost $14. His professor called it a toy. His classmates laughed. He posted a demo on YouTube and got 200 views. Then someone noticed what the device was actually connected to. A wallet. Making $11 million. In 10 months. kch123. $11,525,240 profit. 2,347 predictions. Joined June 2025. → Profile: The device does one thing. He asks it a question with his voice. Claude scans thousands of prediction markets in real time. When it finds a price that doesn't match reality the red LED lights up. Red light. He places the trade. Green result. $2M position on Seahawks. Won. $1.5M on Villarreal not winning. His professor saw the YouTube video again three months later. The demo was the same. The view count wasn't. Neither was the wallet. He asked the student what changed. The student showed him the balance. The professor didn't say anything. Sat down. Then asked if the device could run two accounts. 759K people watching. $319K still loaded in active positions. The device fits in your hand. The LED is still blinking. His classmates stopped laughing around month four. By month six two of them had built their own.

Carver

790,272 次观看 • 3 个月前

A 23 year old girl from Detroit who has 2 children asked Claude how can I make money if I only have 5 free hours a week? He gave an answer and her income per month amounted to $14,560 on children's toys Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping Investments are a subscription to Claude for $20 -> the rest is only profit Claude invents a niche for products analyzing popular directions , creates clickable descriptions , generates photos and videos that stand out among the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress cheaper by 50-60% -> the package goes to the buyer In essence it is a store managed by a manager instead of you you only receive profit spending up to 5 hours a week on this Income: 1 week > $2,458 2 week > $5,659 3 week > $9,825 1 month > $14,560 The full instruction is already in the public access
1:09

A 23 year old girl from Detroit who has 2 children asked Claude how can I make money if I only have 5 free hours a week? He gave an answer and her income per month amounted to $14,560 on children's toys Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping Investments are a subscription to Claude for $20 -> the rest is only profit Claude invents a niche for products analyzing popular directions , creates clickable descriptions , generates photos and videos that stand out among the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress cheaper by 50-60% -> the package goes to the buyer In essence it is a store managed by a manager instead of you you only receive profit spending up to 5 hours a week on this Income: 1 week > $2,458 2 week > $5,659 3 week > $9,825 1 month > $14,560 The full instruction is already in the public access

Bober_smart

11,482 次观看 • 1 个月前

Stanford student fed Claude a book with 151 trading strategies and turned $87 into $213,000 in one week His account is 0xB27 He gave him one task: -find an edge on Polymarket BTC markets Claude analyzed 550 mathematical formulas in 2 minutes and said that most of them don’t work in prediction markets and explained why what remained: → momentum on 5m/15m/1h → binary markets systematically overestimate short-term BTC volatility → there is a gap between what the market thinks and what the data shows He wrote a bot over the weekend from March 4 to today: → 3,426 trades → biggest win: $11,900 on a single position → the account is public, you can check it Profile: “I’m not a trader, I didn’t have trading education, I had a book and Claude”-he says cost of entry: one book and a few prompts The link to the book will be under the post 👇🏼 Just insert PDF files into Claude and create your own bot Add this post to bookmarks so you don’t lose this PDF If you’re interested in which 5 prompts he used to set up the bot Like, repost, comment STANFORD and I’ll send them to you in DM The main thing is to be subscribed so I can DM you
0:24

Stanford student fed Claude a book with 151 trading strategies and turned $87 into $213,000 in one week His account is 0xB27 He gave him one task: -find an edge on Polymarket BTC markets Claude analyzed 550 mathematical formulas in 2 minutes and said that most of them don’t work in prediction markets and explained why what remained: → momentum on 5m/15m/1h → binary markets systematically overestimate short-term BTC volatility → there is a gap between what the market thinks and what the data shows He wrote a bot over the weekend from March 4 to today: → 3,426 trades → biggest win: $11,900 on a single position → the account is public, you can check it Profile: “I’m not a trader, I didn’t have trading education, I had a book and Claude”-he says cost of entry: one book and a few prompts The link to the book will be under the post 👇🏼 Just insert PDF files into Claude and create your own bot Add this post to bookmarks so you don’t lose this PDF If you’re interested in which 5 prompts he used to set up the bot Like, repost, comment STANFORD and I’ll send them to you in DM The main thing is to be subscribed so I can DM you

AdiiX

47,280 次观看 • 4 个月前

An ex-OpenAI engineer walked up to me at a meetup in SF I was showing my Polymarket terminal. He looked at the screen for ten seconds and said one sentence. "You're trading blind. The data is sitting in the open and you're writing prompts" I didn't understand. What data. He took my laptop. Opened one repository. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. The entire Polymarket history since day one. "At OpenAI models don't guess. They read. Connect Claude Code to this dataset and say - find every wallet with a win rate above 70% and more than 100 trades" I asked - why Claude and not GPT? He looked at me like I was an idiot. "Because Claude Code connects to the repo directly. It reads the entire codebase. It's not a chatbox. It's a runtime" That evening I connected it. Claude pulled 47 wallets in 4 minutes. Average profit: $214K. Hold time: 7 hours. 91% close their position BEFORE resolution. Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut losers at 12%. Everyone else - 58% of profit and hold losers to 41%. Same exact entries. The exits make it a completely different game. "Now connect the scanner" Three commands - the bot sees 500+ markets in real time. No API key. Read-only. Claude built the scoring in 20 minutes: Gap between price and model > 7 cents. Book depth > $500. Resolution in 4-48 hours. 93% of markets get killed instantly. Only the fat ones survive. "Now this is the important part" - he sent me an article where a guy built a full bot over a weekend from these same repos Copytrade here: Three exit triggers: Target 85% of expected move. Volume spike x3 - smart money leaving. 24 hours of silence - thesis is dead. I copied the whole stack. VPS $5. Claude $20. Total $25 a month. No team. No office. No Bloomberg. 16 days. 187 trades. 71% win rate. $800 seed. +$8,700. I sent him my screen. He replied a day later. "You just replicated for $25 what cost us six months and 11 people" I said - thanks for the tip. "Delete this chat" Too late.
0:24

An ex-OpenAI engineer walked up to me at a meetup in SF I was showing my Polymarket terminal. He looked at the screen for ten seconds and said one sentence. "You're trading blind. The data is sitting in the open and you're writing prompts" I didn't understand. What data. He took my laptop. Opened one repository. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. The entire Polymarket history since day one. "At OpenAI models don't guess. They read. Connect Claude Code to this dataset and say - find every wallet with a win rate above 70% and more than 100 trades" I asked - why Claude and not GPT? He looked at me like I was an idiot. "Because Claude Code connects to the repo directly. It reads the entire codebase. It's not a chatbox. It's a runtime" That evening I connected it. Claude pulled 47 wallets in 4 minutes. Average profit: $214K. Hold time: 7 hours. 91% close their position BEFORE resolution. Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut losers at 12%. Everyone else - 58% of profit and hold losers to 41%. Same exact entries. The exits make it a completely different game. "Now connect the scanner" Three commands - the bot sees 500+ markets in real time. No API key. Read-only. Claude built the scoring in 20 minutes: Gap between price and model > 7 cents. Book depth > $500. Resolution in 4-48 hours. 93% of markets get killed instantly. Only the fat ones survive. "Now this is the important part" - he sent me an article where a guy built a full bot over a weekend from these same repos Copytrade here: Three exit triggers: Target 85% of expected move. Volume spike x3 - smart money leaving. 24 hours of silence - thesis is dead. I copied the whole stack. VPS $5. Claude $20. Total $25 a month. No team. No office. No Bloomberg. 16 days. 187 trades. 71% win rate. $800 seed. +$8,700. I sent him my screen. He replied a day later. "You just replicated for $25 what cost us six months and 11 people" I said - thanks for the tip. "Delete this chat" Too late.

Lunar

480,799 次观看 • 3 个月前

An Anthropic researcher sat next to me at Ritual Coffee in the Mission yesterday He glanced at my screen and saw the wallet tracker "Wait. Are you copytrading Polymarket wallets" I nodded. "How do you pick which ones. Most of them lose money" 87% of them. I told him that's what Claude found when it scanned 14,000 wallets. "You ran Claude on the whole chain" Yeah. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. I asked Claude one thing. Which wallets win by category, not overall. It came back with three groups. Weather specialists. 85-94% win rate on meteorological markets. Bleed on everything else. Crypto-only. 88-96% on crypto. Lose on politics. Macro traders. 82-91% on Fed decisions and rate cuts. Dead on sports. "So you don't copy the wallet. You copy the category" Exactly. Retail mirrors the whole wallet. Smart money filters to the one category where they actually have edge. Skip the rest. He asked about speed. Profitable wallets enter 0-3 seconds after signal. Retail enters 12-18 seconds later. Same trade. Different fill. 7 cents of slippage per entry. Over 200 trades that's $1,400 gone just from being slow. "That's not intelligence. That's execution" Both. Then I showed him the third pattern. Capital velocity. Elite wallets recycle the same $500 fifty-one times a month. Retail recycles once. Same seed. 51x the work. He went quiet. Another fill landed on my screen. Weather market. +$47. Wallet for copytrading: "How long have you been running this" 11 weeks. Week 1-2. Manual. Caught 35% of trades. Lost 6 cents to slippage. +$3,100. Week 3-5. Loaded 6 wallets into Kreo. Category filter on. Priority Mode executing in the same Polygon block. Caught 78%. +$18,900. Week 6-8. Velocity filter. Only wallets recycling 40x+ monthly. +$31,400. Week 9-11. Full auto. Copying weather, crypto, macro. Trading Asia hours while I sleep. +$40,800. Total from $800. +$98,500. "What did you study" Nothing. My roommate did the first run in February and made $94K. I just copied him in April. Start in February. $94K. Start in April. $98K. Start in August. Maybe $55K. Not because the strategy stops. Because edge compresses when more people find it. He pulled out his phone and started typing. "Stanford emailed my roommate yesterday. Reconsidering his application" He didn't open it. PhD teaches you to research for 5 years. Claude taught him to find edge in one night. Wallets are on-chain. Data is public. The bottleneck was never analysis. It was category filtering and execution speed. Copytrade here: Full breakdown went up yesterday. Every wallet address. Every pattern. Every week. His manager DMed me this morning. "Any chance we can talk" I told him the article is the talk. Too late to gatekeep.
0:20

An Anthropic researcher sat next to me at Ritual Coffee in the Mission yesterday He glanced at my screen and saw the wallet tracker "Wait. Are you copytrading Polymarket wallets" I nodded. "How do you pick which ones. Most of them lose money" 87% of them. I told him that's what Claude found when it scanned 14,000 wallets. "You ran Claude on the whole chain" Yeah. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. I asked Claude one thing. Which wallets win by category, not overall. It came back with three groups. Weather specialists. 85-94% win rate on meteorological markets. Bleed on everything else. Crypto-only. 88-96% on crypto. Lose on politics. Macro traders. 82-91% on Fed decisions and rate cuts. Dead on sports. "So you don't copy the wallet. You copy the category" Exactly. Retail mirrors the whole wallet. Smart money filters to the one category where they actually have edge. Skip the rest. He asked about speed. Profitable wallets enter 0-3 seconds after signal. Retail enters 12-18 seconds later. Same trade. Different fill. 7 cents of slippage per entry. Over 200 trades that's $1,400 gone just from being slow. "That's not intelligence. That's execution" Both. Then I showed him the third pattern. Capital velocity. Elite wallets recycle the same $500 fifty-one times a month. Retail recycles once. Same seed. 51x the work. He went quiet. Another fill landed on my screen. Weather market. +$47. Wallet for copytrading: "How long have you been running this" 11 weeks. Week 1-2. Manual. Caught 35% of trades. Lost 6 cents to slippage. +$3,100. Week 3-5. Loaded 6 wallets into Kreo. Category filter on. Priority Mode executing in the same Polygon block. Caught 78%. +$18,900. Week 6-8. Velocity filter. Only wallets recycling 40x+ monthly. +$31,400. Week 9-11. Full auto. Copying weather, crypto, macro. Trading Asia hours while I sleep. +$40,800. Total from $800. +$98,500. "What did you study" Nothing. My roommate did the first run in February and made $94K. I just copied him in April. Start in February. $94K. Start in April. $98K. Start in August. Maybe $55K. Not because the strategy stops. Because edge compresses when more people find it. He pulled out his phone and started typing. "Stanford emailed my roommate yesterday. Reconsidering his application" He didn't open it. PhD teaches you to research for 5 years. Claude taught him to find edge in one night. Wallets are on-chain. Data is public. The bottleneck was never analysis. It was category filtering and execution speed. Copytrade here: Full breakdown went up yesterday. Every wallet address. Every pattern. Every week. His manager DMed me this morning. "Any chance we can talk" I told him the article is the talk. Too late to gatekeep.

Lunar

32,816 次观看 • 3 个月前

OpenAI just mass-fired their robotics team. One of the engineers DM'd me 20 minutes later. I didn't know him. He found me through a Polymarket thread. His first message: "I have 30 days of severance and nothing to lose. Let me tell you what we actually use internally. It's not GPT" I thought he was trolling. "Every serious team at OpenAI prototypes on Claude Code. Not ChatGPT. Not the API. Claude Code connected to a repo. That's the actual workflow" I asked why. "Because Claude reads the codebase. GPT reads the prompt. There's a difference. One guesses. The other one understands the full context and builds on top of it" He sent me one link. 86 million Polymarket trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. Open source. Free. "Point Claude Code at this. Say - find every wallet with 70%+ win rate and 100+ trades. Watch what happens" I did it that night. Claude pulled 47 wallets in 4 minutes. Average profit: $214K. Hold time: 7 hours. 91% exit BEFORE resolution. They never wait for the outcome. "Now look at how they exit" Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut at 12%. Everyone else captures 58% and holds losers to 41%. Same entries. Completely different results. He sent another link. "Three commands. Your bot sees 500+ markets. No key needed. Read-only. Claude scores them in 20 minutes" I asked why he's telling me all this. "Because I just got fired for saying we should open-source more. So here I am open-sourcing everything I know" Then he sent me an article where someone built the full bot from these repos in a weekend -> Three exit triggers: Target 85% of move. Volume spike x3 - smart money out. 24h silence - thesis dead. I copied the stack. Claude Code $20. VPS $5. $25/month. No team. No office. No GPT subscription. 17 days. 191 trades. 73% win rate. $850 seed. +$9,400. I sent him my results. He replied: "This is exactly what I built as a side project at OpenAI. They made me delete it" I asked if I could post this. "Post it. What are they gonna do. Fire me again?"
0:22

OpenAI just mass-fired their robotics team. One of the engineers DM'd me 20 minutes later. I didn't know him. He found me through a Polymarket thread. His first message: "I have 30 days of severance and nothing to lose. Let me tell you what we actually use internally. It's not GPT" I thought he was trolling. "Every serious team at OpenAI prototypes on Claude Code. Not ChatGPT. Not the API. Claude Code connected to a repo. That's the actual workflow" I asked why. "Because Claude reads the codebase. GPT reads the prompt. There's a difference. One guesses. The other one understands the full context and builds on top of it" He sent me one link. 86 million Polymarket trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. Open source. Free. "Point Claude Code at this. Say - find every wallet with 70%+ win rate and 100+ trades. Watch what happens" I did it that night. Claude pulled 47 wallets in 4 minutes. Average profit: $214K. Hold time: 7 hours. 91% exit BEFORE resolution. They never wait for the outcome. "Now look at how they exit" Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut at 12%. Everyone else captures 58% and holds losers to 41%. Same entries. Completely different results. He sent another link. "Three commands. Your bot sees 500+ markets. No key needed. Read-only. Claude scores them in 20 minutes" I asked why he's telling me all this. "Because I just got fired for saying we should open-source more. So here I am open-sourcing everything I know" Then he sent me an article where someone built the full bot from these repos in a weekend -> Three exit triggers: Target 85% of move. Volume spike x3 - smart money out. 24h silence - thesis dead. I copied the stack. Claude Code $20. VPS $5. $25/month. No team. No office. No GPT subscription. 17 days. 191 trades. 73% win rate. $850 seed. +$9,400. I sent him my results. He replied: "This is exactly what I built as a side project at OpenAI. They made me delete it" I asked if I could post this. "Post it. What are they gonna do. Fire me again?"

rari

157,384 次观看 • 3 个月前

WATCH: 🚨CHINESE INVADER IN DARIEN GAP MIGRANT CAMP TELLS ME HES COMING TO THE US ILLEGALLY FROM CHINA🚨 I visited the San Vicente “migrant” camp in Darien Gap Panama which has seen a massive influx in invaders from China who are using Darien Gap as a transit location to get to the United States via the border. I encountered this Chinese invader who said he was traveling with 2 children. He didn’t speak English, so I had to use. Translator app to communicate with him. I asked him pointed questions about where he was planning to go inside the US, and each time I asked him, he dodged the question and proceeded to give me talking points about democracy and dictatorships. This sounds like a script to me, and many of the Chinese invaders I spoke with also had the same talking point. Is the CCP giving invaders talking points that will help them apply for asylum once they enter the US illegally? As you can see from the video, this man said he came from Beijing and he’s coming to the US with 2 kids. I met him in Darien Gap. The Chinese Communist party is actively invading the US via invaders. And they are coming in via the Darien Gap.
5:19

WATCH: 🚨CHINESE INVADER IN DARIEN GAP MIGRANT CAMP TELLS ME HES COMING TO THE US ILLEGALLY FROM CHINA🚨 I visited the San Vicente “migrant” camp in Darien Gap Panama which has seen a massive influx in invaders from China who are using Darien Gap as a transit location to get to the United States via the border. I encountered this Chinese invader who said he was traveling with 2 children. He didn’t speak English, so I had to use. Translator app to communicate with him. I asked him pointed questions about where he was planning to go inside the US, and each time I asked him, he dodged the question and proceeded to give me talking points about democracy and dictatorships. This sounds like a script to me, and many of the Chinese invaders I spoke with also had the same talking point. Is the CCP giving invaders talking points that will help them apply for asylum once they enter the US illegally? As you can see from the video, this man said he came from Beijing and he’s coming to the US with 2 kids. I met him in Darien Gap. The Chinese Communist party is actively invading the US via invaders. And they are coming in via the Darien Gap.

Laura Loomer

1,395,358 次观看 • 2 年前

Couldn't sleep. 3AM. Opened Gemini Live. Earbuds in. Lights off. Talking to AI like a late night phone call with a friend. Started with random stuff. Macro. Bitcoin. Then I asked something I didn't expect to care about. Is it actually possible to make consistent money on prediction markets? Or is it all luck? Gemini paused. Then: The market is efficient on average. But 15 minute BTC rounds update slower than exchanges. If software sees the Binance price before the platform does, it buys at 10 cents what already pays $1. This is not a prediction. It's a delay. I sat up in bed. You're saying the answer already exists before the market closes? For a few seconds, yes. Useless for a human. Enough for a script. → Wallet: I spent the next hour asking questions by voice in the dark. Gemini explained everything. Where the lag comes from. Why it doesn't close. How the math works. At the end I asked: If this works, someone is already doing it? Check the leaderboard. High frequency. Entries in the first seconds. Win rate above 70%. Morning. Laptop. 20 minutes of searching. guh123. $181,775 profit. 16,314 predictions. Joined February 2026. Everything Gemini described. Exactly. 16,314 trades. One month. $181K. Entries between 6 and 14 cents. Profit curve like a staircase. No pullbacks. Small bets. $700 to $1,800 each. But 400+ per day. Every day. The wallet doesn't swing for home runs. It collects $2,000 to $3,000 four hundred times. I showed the wallet to Gemini the next night. Same earbuds. Same dark room. Asked: Is this the wallet you were describing? Entry timing, position size, and win rate are consistent with the latency arbitrage pattern I explained. This wallet enters an average of 7 seconds after Binance price movement. The platform needs 25 to 30 seconds to update. 7 seconds. That's the entire edge. 16,314 times. The best investment insight I've ever gotten came at 3AM lying in bed talking to my phone in the dark. Gemini didn't find the wallet. It explained why a wallet like this should exist. I just went and found it. $181,775. 6,800 views. Most people scroll past it. They don't know what they're looking at. Now I do. Because I couldn't sleep and asked my phone the right question.
0:52

Couldn't sleep. 3AM. Opened Gemini Live. Earbuds in. Lights off. Talking to AI like a late night phone call with a friend. Started with random stuff. Macro. Bitcoin. Then I asked something I didn't expect to care about. Is it actually possible to make consistent money on prediction markets? Or is it all luck? Gemini paused. Then: The market is efficient on average. But 15 minute BTC rounds update slower than exchanges. If software sees the Binance price before the platform does, it buys at 10 cents what already pays $1. This is not a prediction. It's a delay. I sat up in bed. You're saying the answer already exists before the market closes? For a few seconds, yes. Useless for a human. Enough for a script. → Wallet: I spent the next hour asking questions by voice in the dark. Gemini explained everything. Where the lag comes from. Why it doesn't close. How the math works. At the end I asked: If this works, someone is already doing it? Check the leaderboard. High frequency. Entries in the first seconds. Win rate above 70%. Morning. Laptop. 20 minutes of searching. guh123. $181,775 profit. 16,314 predictions. Joined February 2026. Everything Gemini described. Exactly. 16,314 trades. One month. $181K. Entries between 6 and 14 cents. Profit curve like a staircase. No pullbacks. Small bets. $700 to $1,800 each. But 400+ per day. Every day. The wallet doesn't swing for home runs. It collects $2,000 to $3,000 four hundred times. I showed the wallet to Gemini the next night. Same earbuds. Same dark room. Asked: Is this the wallet you were describing? Entry timing, position size, and win rate are consistent with the latency arbitrage pattern I explained. This wallet enters an average of 7 seconds after Binance price movement. The platform needs 25 to 30 seconds to update. 7 seconds. That's the entire edge. 16,314 times. The best investment insight I've ever gotten came at 3AM lying in bed talking to my phone in the dark. Gemini didn't find the wallet. It explained why a wallet like this should exist. I just went and found it. $181,775. 6,800 views. Most people scroll past it. They don't know what they're looking at. Now I do. Because I couldn't sleep and asked my phone the right question.

Marlow

34,756 次观看 • 4 个月前

ONE OF CLAUDE'S DEVELOPERS SHOWED HIS SETUP. HE DOESN'T USE CLAUDE THE WAY YOU DO he didn't post this on twitter. didn't make a thread. just showed his setup on a call and someone recorded it and when i saw what was inside, i understood why he never starts a conversation with claude from scratch the first file in his vault is called CLAUDE.md. it's not a note. it's a full profile: who he is, how he thinks, where he gets stuck, what projects he's running, how he wants to be talked to. claude loads this file automatically every session meaning the ai doesn't ask "how can i help?" he opens a conversation and claude is already in context. knows his goals. remembers what he postponed two months ago. sees where he's contradicting himself and that's just the beginning every project is its own folder with a clean structure: inputs, process, outputs, feedback. when he works on something, he opens only that folder. claude sees one project, not the chaos of his entire life anything he does more than once is saved as a skill. email a client, break down a call, prep a document. one line and claude does it his way and at 7am every day claude walks through the entire vault on its own. files new stuff. links it. flags what's gone stale. writes him 3 lines: what changed overnight he wakes up and the brain already worked and here's what got me the most: it's all just text files. no cloud. no lock-in. if a better model drops tomorrow, he points it at the same folder and everything keeps working he basically uploaded himself into a file system. and now ai doesn't guess who he is. ai knows most people use claude like google with manners. this guy built himself an external memory that grows every day i break down finds like this every day - follow so you don't miss the next one
0:54

ONE OF CLAUDE'S DEVELOPERS SHOWED HIS SETUP. HE DOESN'T USE CLAUDE THE WAY YOU DO he didn't post this on twitter. didn't make a thread. just showed his setup on a call and someone recorded it and when i saw what was inside, i understood why he never starts a conversation with claude from scratch the first file in his vault is called CLAUDE.md. it's not a note. it's a full profile: who he is, how he thinks, where he gets stuck, what projects he's running, how he wants to be talked to. claude loads this file automatically every session meaning the ai doesn't ask "how can i help?" he opens a conversation and claude is already in context. knows his goals. remembers what he postponed two months ago. sees where he's contradicting himself and that's just the beginning every project is its own folder with a clean structure: inputs, process, outputs, feedback. when he works on something, he opens only that folder. claude sees one project, not the chaos of his entire life anything he does more than once is saved as a skill. email a client, break down a call, prep a document. one line and claude does it his way and at 7am every day claude walks through the entire vault on its own. files new stuff. links it. flags what's gone stale. writes him 3 lines: what changed overnight he wakes up and the brain already worked and here's what got me the most: it's all just text files. no cloud. no lock-in. if a better model drops tomorrow, he points it at the same folder and everything keeps working he basically uploaded himself into a file system. and now ai doesn't guess who he is. ai knows most people use claude like google with manners. this guy built himself an external memory that grows every day i break down finds like this every day - follow so you don't miss the next one

kai

110,412 次观看 • 10 天前

My roommate works at a coffee shop. $15 an hour. 36 hours a week. He came home last Tuesday and said he saved up $500 and wants to put it somewhere. I said honestly I don't know. I lost money on stocks last year. Not the right person to ask. He sat down next to me and opened Claude on his laptop. Typed: I have $500 in savings. I can't afford to lose it but I need it to grow. What do people with small money do that people with big money don't? Claude said something neither of us expected. People with large capital compete on speed and size. People with small capital have one advantage: they can buy things so cheap that nobody else bothers. Events priced at half a cent. $5 bets that pay $2,500 if they hit. Big funds can't deploy $5. You can. Then Claude added: Someone is doing exactly this right now. Look up planktonXD. We looked. planktonXD. $95,393 profit. 78,097 predictions. Joined February 2025. Bio: having fun. → Wallet: 78,097 bets. Most of them between $4 and $25. Most of them go to zero. But the ones that don't. $4.55 on S&P 500 opening direction. Payout: $2,531. ROI: 55,545%. My roommate stared at that first line for a long time. Then said: He bet four dollars and fifty five cents. And won two thousand five hundred. I asked Claude to explain the math. Claude: Imagine 100 events priced at 1 cent each. You put $5 on all of them. That's $500 total. 97 lose. You lose $485. Three hit. Each pays $500. You collect $1,500. Net profit: $1,015. The strategy works because crowds overestimate what's likely and underestimate what's possible. planktonXD didn't find three. He found hundreds. $500 worth of bets at a time. Over and over. For 14 months. $95,393. From bets most people would laugh at. My roommate put in $50 that night. Copied six positions under 1 cent. I told him most will die. He said: if one hits like that S&P trade I just made a month of rent from a coffee shop shift tip. He still works at the coffee shop. Still makes $15 an hour. But now he checks his phone on breaks for a different reason. 78,097 predictions. Bio still says having fun. The wallet doesn't care about your salary. It only cares about the price of things nobody else wants to buy. I asked Claude one more thing: What do you call someone who bets $4 and wins $2,500? Claude: Patient. The rest of the market just calls them lucky. That's why the edge still exists.
0:51

My roommate works at a coffee shop. $15 an hour. 36 hours a week. He came home last Tuesday and said he saved up $500 and wants to put it somewhere. I said honestly I don't know. I lost money on stocks last year. Not the right person to ask. He sat down next to me and opened Claude on his laptop. Typed: I have $500 in savings. I can't afford to lose it but I need it to grow. What do people with small money do that people with big money don't? Claude said something neither of us expected. People with large capital compete on speed and size. People with small capital have one advantage: they can buy things so cheap that nobody else bothers. Events priced at half a cent. $5 bets that pay $2,500 if they hit. Big funds can't deploy $5. You can. Then Claude added: Someone is doing exactly this right now. Look up planktonXD. We looked. planktonXD. $95,393 profit. 78,097 predictions. Joined February 2025. Bio: having fun. → Wallet: 78,097 bets. Most of them between $4 and $25. Most of them go to zero. But the ones that don't. $4.55 on S&P 500 opening direction. Payout: $2,531. ROI: 55,545%. My roommate stared at that first line for a long time. Then said: He bet four dollars and fifty five cents. And won two thousand five hundred. I asked Claude to explain the math. Claude: Imagine 100 events priced at 1 cent each. You put $5 on all of them. That's $500 total. 97 lose. You lose $485. Three hit. Each pays $500. You collect $1,500. Net profit: $1,015. The strategy works because crowds overestimate what's likely and underestimate what's possible. planktonXD didn't find three. He found hundreds. $500 worth of bets at a time. Over and over. For 14 months. $95,393. From bets most people would laugh at. My roommate put in $50 that night. Copied six positions under 1 cent. I told him most will die. He said: if one hits like that S&P trade I just made a month of rent from a coffee shop shift tip. He still works at the coffee shop. Still makes $15 an hour. But now he checks his phone on breaks for a different reason. 78,097 predictions. Bio still says having fun. The wallet doesn't care about your salary. It only cares about the price of things nobody else wants to buy. I asked Claude one more thing: What do you call someone who bets $4 and wins $2,500? Claude: Patient. The rest of the market just calls them lucky. That's why the edge still exists.

Marlow

13,068 次观看 • 3 个月前

“Lips in the Zipped Jacket” He said, “I have been hurt before and don’t trust easily. But there’s something about you that I can’t seem to ignore. Who are you, and where did you come from suddenly?” It’s like you just appeared in front of me and left me confused and dazed at the same time. May I ask your name? She said, “No need to tell you who I am, because my heart belongs to someone special.” He said, “Are you married?” She said, “No, but I am emotionally unavailable to give you anything because the heart that beats in my chest belongs to someone else.” He asked her, “And does this someone else feel the same way about you?” She paused and answered, “That’s private information I am unwilling to divulge. But all I know is that I wake up thinking about him and go to sleep thinking about him. Sometimes I see myself cuddling with him, and when I’m alone I feel his spirit near me.” He said, “That sounds like infatuated love.” She said, “Infatuated love is conditional, and it fades when the feeling is only temporary. But my heart has settled comfortably with this love.” He said, “Allow me to love you and show you real love.” She said, “There’s no such thing as real love. Like beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, love can only be felt in the chest, that it beats. And sometimes you just don’t know why it beats the way it does.” He said, “If this is true, then give me a chance and let me love you. And all you have to do is wake up every day to be loved.” She said, “I am already loved.” He asked, “Who is this man who has captured your heart?” She said, “My heart belongs to the one who likes to hide his lips in his zipped jacket.” He said, “He is surely blessed.” She said, “No… maybe I am the blessed one.” He said, “No, trust me. He is blessed to have a loyal woman.” Song written by: Lily C. Alphonsis, PhD Video credit: Incomparable Lily
3:11

“Lips in the Zipped Jacket” He said, “I have been hurt before and don’t trust easily. But there’s something about you that I can’t seem to ignore. Who are you, and where did you come from suddenly?” It’s like you just appeared in front of me and left me confused and dazed at the same time. May I ask your name? She said, “No need to tell you who I am, because my heart belongs to someone special.” He said, “Are you married?” She said, “No, but I am emotionally unavailable to give you anything because the heart that beats in my chest belongs to someone else.” He asked her, “And does this someone else feel the same way about you?” She paused and answered, “That’s private information I am unwilling to divulge. But all I know is that I wake up thinking about him and go to sleep thinking about him. Sometimes I see myself cuddling with him, and when I’m alone I feel his spirit near me.” He said, “That sounds like infatuated love.” She said, “Infatuated love is conditional, and it fades when the feeling is only temporary. But my heart has settled comfortably with this love.” He said, “Allow me to love you and show you real love.” She said, “There’s no such thing as real love. Like beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, love can only be felt in the chest, that it beats. And sometimes you just don’t know why it beats the way it does.” He said, “If this is true, then give me a chance and let me love you. And all you have to do is wake up every day to be loved.” She said, “I am already loved.” He asked, “Who is this man who has captured your heart?” She said, “My heart belongs to the one who likes to hide his lips in his zipped jacket.” He said, “He is surely blessed.” She said, “No… maybe I am the blessed one.” He said, “No, trust me. He is blessed to have a loyal woman.” Song written by: Lily C. Alphonsis, PhD Video credit: Incomparable Lily

World Movie Awards (WMAs)

174,759 次观看 • 5 个月前

You are full of shit. That is what I told my friend when he said he turned $800 into $47K in 6 weeks. Then he showed me his phone. I felt sick. Not because he was lying. Because he wasn't. 43 trades. 41 wins. 2 losses. The screenshot was real. Every single position closed in profit. Did you find some insider source? I asked. He laughed. I don't even read the news anymore. Then he showed me something that broke my brain: He doesn't pick the trades. He mirrors them. There is a wallet on Polymarket that's up 940%. Not luck. Not once. Three months straight of winning. See for yourself: My friend's entire strategy: → Wake up → Check if that wallet traded → Copy the exact position within 60 seconds → Go back to sleep No research. No FOMO. No what if I'm wrong. He's literally parasiting on someone else's edge. And here's the part that made me feel sick: While he's printing money on autopilot I'm reading 30-page election analyses at 2am. Spending hours cross-referencing polls. Building spreadsheets. Overthinking every single trade. He's not smarter than me. He's not richer. He's not connected. He just stopped pretending manual trading isn't a scam. I asked him: What if that wallet stops winning? He shrugged: Then I find another one. There's always a new king. Cold. Calculated. Zero emotion. This isn't trading. This is systematic theft from people who still think effort matters. Yesterday I started doing the same thing. I found the wallet. I set up alerts. I copied 4 trades. I'm 4/4. I've spent zero hours on research. My friend was right. The market doesn't reward the smartest. It rewards the fastest shadow. You can keep reading reports at 3am. You can keep building models that should work. Or you can accept the truth: Someone already figured it out. Your job isn't to be smarter. Your job is to copy faster. P.S. I won't name the wallet. But if you know where to look on Polymarket you'll find it. Top performers. Recent volume. Consistent win rate above 90%. They're not hiding. You're just not looking.
0:25

You are full of shit. That is what I told my friend when he said he turned $800 into $47K in 6 weeks. Then he showed me his phone. I felt sick. Not because he was lying. Because he wasn't. 43 trades. 41 wins. 2 losses. The screenshot was real. Every single position closed in profit. Did you find some insider source? I asked. He laughed. I don't even read the news anymore. Then he showed me something that broke my brain: He doesn't pick the trades. He mirrors them. There is a wallet on Polymarket that's up 940%. Not luck. Not once. Three months straight of winning. See for yourself: My friend's entire strategy: → Wake up → Check if that wallet traded → Copy the exact position within 60 seconds → Go back to sleep No research. No FOMO. No what if I'm wrong. He's literally parasiting on someone else's edge. And here's the part that made me feel sick: While he's printing money on autopilot I'm reading 30-page election analyses at 2am. Spending hours cross-referencing polls. Building spreadsheets. Overthinking every single trade. He's not smarter than me. He's not richer. He's not connected. He just stopped pretending manual trading isn't a scam. I asked him: What if that wallet stops winning? He shrugged: Then I find another one. There's always a new king. Cold. Calculated. Zero emotion. This isn't trading. This is systematic theft from people who still think effort matters. Yesterday I started doing the same thing. I found the wallet. I set up alerts. I copied 4 trades. I'm 4/4. I've spent zero hours on research. My friend was right. The market doesn't reward the smartest. It rewards the fastest shadow. You can keep reading reports at 3am. You can keep building models that should work. Or you can accept the truth: Someone already figured it out. Your job isn't to be smarter. Your job is to copy faster. P.S. I won't name the wallet. But if you know where to look on Polymarket you'll find it. Top performers. Recent volume. Consistent win rate above 90%. They're not hiding. You're just not looking.

Blaze

23,073 次观看 • 6 个月前

WATCH | We managed to get photos of the two men who have been scamming people using fake money. The men drive around in a Silver Toyota Hilux Double cab. The person who sent us the video was also one of their victims, and his colleague recorded the men’s faces while they were trying to scam someone else. The victim said that in October 2025, the two men scammed him of US$1,600 in Mt Pleasant, Harare. He explained that the men came to the service station where he works and asked him to help them exchange their money. They told him they had between US$1,500 and US$2,000 in US$20 notes, and they wanted solid cash in US$50 and US$100 notes. He said that after he got US$1,600, the men gave him US$20 notes worth the same amount. While he was counting the money, the men started arguing with each other, saying their money was short by US$20. They asked him to return all the money so they could count it again together. He said that at that moment, it felt like they used some trick on him, because he agreed to give the money back without thinking. When they counted the money again, everything looked correct, and one of the men tied the money with a rubber band. The victim said he did not understand what trick they used, because later he realised that he was only left with US$20 and the rest of the notes were bond notes. The men then ran away in their car. He also said the car’s number plates were being changed often, and at his workplace the car had plates AFP 0516. Zimbabwe Republic Police
1:09

WATCH | We managed to get photos of the two men who have been scamming people using fake money. The men drive around in a Silver Toyota Hilux Double cab. The person who sent us the video was also one of their victims, and his colleague recorded the men’s faces while they were trying to scam someone else. The victim said that in October 2025, the two men scammed him of US$1,600 in Mt Pleasant, Harare. He explained that the men came to the service station where he works and asked him to help them exchange their money. They told him they had between US$1,500 and US$2,000 in US$20 notes, and they wanted solid cash in US$50 and US$100 notes. He said that after he got US$1,600, the men gave him US$20 notes worth the same amount. While he was counting the money, the men started arguing with each other, saying their money was short by US$20. They asked him to return all the money so they could count it again together. He said that at that moment, it felt like they used some trick on him, because he agreed to give the money back without thinking. When they counted the money again, everything looked correct, and one of the men tied the money with a rubber band. The victim said he did not understand what trick they used, because later he realised that he was only left with US$20 and the rest of the notes were bond notes. The men then ran away in their car. He also said the car’s number plates were being changed often, and at his workplace the car had plates AFP 0516. Zimbabwe Republic Police

𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐖

60,409 次观看 • 7 个月前