Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Chris Burnett from Working Title discusses the avionics systems in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024: GNS 530, G1000 NXI, G3X Touch, G3000, Collins Proline 21, Honeywell Primus Epic 2, Universal UNS-1, and the Boeing 747-400 LCF Avionics system.

Microsoft Flight Simulator✈️

137,396 subscribers

26,552 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Bella

Bella1 год назад

I have so much respect for working title. Amazing team. Made such a difference in whole sim experience for many

Фото профиля Equalizer ✊🏽

Equalizer ✊🏽1 год назад

I've just bought a new machine ready for this. 😭🙏🏽

Фото профиля Masyer Tech

Masyer Tech1 год назад

Thnk u

Фото профиля Malic_VR

Malic_VR1 год назад

I love the fact that the satellites locations are being modeled, and that can lead to how precise the GPS ends up being depending on how many are in view.

Фото профиля Karl Hab

Karl Hab1 год назад

Primus Epic is a way more complicated than Proline and Garmin suites

Фото профиля FlyZulu

FlyZulu1 год назад

When are you guys getting ultra long-range business jets to the platform: Global 6500-8000 or Gulfstream G550 - 800. The business jet lovers community is not catered for.

Фото профиля FlyZulu

FlyZulu1 год назад

This is incredible tho

Фото профиля FlyZulu

FlyZulu1 год назад

What I also love about this is that we would be able to make precise STAR approaches as laid out by real professional charts and I sure the built-in ATC will vector accordingly. beautiful. We just need long range private jets now.

Фото профиля FSD (Beta) Test Pilot

FSD (Beta) Test Pilot1 год назад

This is a tremendous amount of work! I'm happily going to buy the $200 Aviator version to reward the team for their hard work.

Фото профиля Larry Newon

Larry Newon1 год назад

Model the 787 and 737 PFDs correctly though

Похожие видео

🇷🇺 Russia’s Yakovlev makes another fully domestic passenger plane, a Yakovlev MC-21. These planes were developed with many Russian parts pre 2022, but now Yak reworked the model and swapped everything for Russian parts. The aircraft had its imported components and systems replaced with Russian ones. The procedure of swapping every part of a plane for domestic components is extremely complex, as this has not been done before. Usually you iterate on a plane part by part, not doing such a big bang change. This procedure includes replacement of the cockpit controls, control system drives, wing mechanization movement system and stabilizer adjustment mechanism, avionics complex, integrated air conditioning system, integrated system for collecting, monitoring, processing, and recording flight information, wheel braking system, main and auxiliary power units, fuel system, wheels, tires, and more. The plant workers, together with specialists from the flight test and refinement complex of PJSC "Yakovlev," are checking the fuel system, start-up and operation of the auxiliary power unit and main engines, as well as testing of the aircraft's systems and equipment with the engines running. Frequency tests of the landing gear systems and integrated control system were also carried out on the aircraft. 1/

🇷🇺 Russia’s Yakovlev makes another fully domestic passenger plane, a Yakovlev MC-21. These planes were developed with many Russian parts pre 2022, but now Yak reworked the model and swapped everything for Russian parts. The aircraft had its imported components and systems replaced with Russian ones. The procedure of swapping every part of a plane for domestic components is extremely complex, as this has not been done before. Usually you iterate on a plane part by part, not doing such a big bang change. This procedure includes replacement of the cockpit controls, control system drives, wing mechanization movement system and stabilizer adjustment mechanism, avionics complex, integrated air conditioning system, integrated system for collecting, monitoring, processing, and recording flight information, wheel braking system, main and auxiliary power units, fuel system, wheels, tires, and more. The plant workers, together with specialists from the flight test and refinement complex of PJSC "Yakovlev," are checking the fuel system, start-up and operation of the auxiliary power unit and main engines, as well as testing of the aircraft's systems and equipment with the engines running. Frequency tests of the landing gear systems and integrated control system were also carried out on the aircraft. 1/

Lord Bebo

161,686 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

$The Gripen nearly destroyed itself on its 6th flight. On February 2, 1989, Saab’s first JAS 39 Gripen prototype, 39-1, came in to land at Linköping. Then everything went wrong. A hard touchdown triggered violent pitch-and-roll oscillations. The left wing struck the ground, sending the prototype into multiple cartwheels while its afterburner was still lit. Remarkably, test pilot Lars Rådeström survived, suffering only a fractured elbow. The crash was traced to pilot-induced oscillation, gusty winds and immature fly-by-wire control software. The failure exposed critical weaknesses that Saab would go on to fix as the Gripen's flight-control system matured. Fast-forward to today, and the Gripen has evolved into a highly capable multirole fighter prized for its agility, advanced avionics, electronic warfare capabilities and ability to operate from dispersed road bases. From crashing on its sixth flight to becoming one of the most respected lightweight fighters in service. Where does the Gripen rank among today’s top fighter jets? 🇸🇪✈️$

The Gripen nearly destroyed itself on its 6th flight. On February 2, 1989, Saab’s first JAS 39 Gripen prototype, 39-1, came in to land at Linköping. Then everything went wrong. A hard touchdown triggered violent pitch-and-roll oscillations. The left wing struck the ground, sending the prototype into multiple cartwheels while its afterburner was still lit. Remarkably, test pilot Lars Rådeström survived, suffering only a fractured elbow. The crash was traced to pilot-induced oscillation, gusty winds and immature fly-by-wire control software. The failure exposed critical weaknesses that Saab would go on to fix as the Gripen's flight-control system matured. Fast-forward to today, and the Gripen has evolved into a highly capable multirole fighter prized for its agility, advanced avionics, electronic warfare capabilities and ability to operate from dispersed road bases. From crashing on its sixth flight to becoming one of the most respected lightweight fighters in service. Where does the Gripen rank among today’s top fighter jets? 🇸🇪✈️

Airforce Geek

211,239 просмотров • 12 дней назад

High Dirty electricity on Airplanes🤯 Below readings were taken by Eric Windheim while flying on Boeing 747 MAX8 using an oscilloscope plugged into the airplane's power socket. Look at the massive levels of Dirty Electricity (high-frequency voltage transients) riding on the aircraft’s power system, with harmonics reaching beyond 90 KHz This isn’t just MINOR ELECTRICAL NOISE. The waveforms show intense modulation patterns, likely caused by switch-mode power supplies (SMPS), Inverters, LED lighting & onboard WiFi systems. All this in ADDITION to EMFs from RADAR, avionics, in-flight Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, passenger devices. No wonder people feel so drained after flying. But the problem goes deeper than just the readings. What makes this reading even more concerning is the physical environment of the aircraft itself. An airplane is essentially a hollow aluminum tube, a conductive enclosure. In Physics, this acts as a Faraday Cage. It blocks signals from getting in, but it also traps signals inside. With 200+ people using cellphones & Bluetooth, plus the plane's industrial WiFi, the radiation has nowhere to go. It just bounces off the walls and zaps you from every angle. Another thing most people don't realize that aircraft electrical systems don't run on the standard 50/60Hz grid we use on the ground. They run on 400 Hz to save weight on parts. This higher frequency baseline is already more biologically active than ground current. Add in those dirty spikes from the readings above and you have a chaotic electrical soup. So If you plug your laptop or cellphone into the seat, you are physically connecting yourself to that Dirty electricity. You have been warned.

High Dirty electricity on Airplanes🤯 Below readings were taken by Eric Windheim while flying on Boeing 747 MAX8 using an oscilloscope plugged into the airplane's power socket. Look at the massive levels of Dirty Electricity (high-frequency voltage transients) riding on the aircraft’s power system, with harmonics reaching beyond 90 KHz This isn’t just MINOR ELECTRICAL NOISE. The waveforms show intense modulation patterns, likely caused by switch-mode power supplies (SMPS), Inverters, LED lighting & onboard WiFi systems. All this in ADDITION to EMFs from RADAR, avionics, in-flight Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, passenger devices. No wonder people feel so drained after flying. But the problem goes deeper than just the readings. What makes this reading even more concerning is the physical environment of the aircraft itself. An airplane is essentially a hollow aluminum tube, a conductive enclosure. In Physics, this acts as a Faraday Cage. It blocks signals from getting in, but it also traps signals inside. With 200+ people using cellphones & Bluetooth, plus the plane's industrial WiFi, the radiation has nowhere to go. It just bounces off the walls and zaps you from every angle. Another thing most people don't realize that aircraft electrical systems don't run on the standard 50/60Hz grid we use on the ground. They run on 400 Hz to save weight on parts. This higher frequency baseline is already more biologically active than ground current. Add in those dirty spikes from the readings above and you have a chaotic electrical soup. So If you plug your laptop or cellphone into the seat, you are physically connecting yourself to that Dirty electricity. You have been warned.

Rusty ⚡️: Solar Powered ☀️

447,226 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The last couple minutes of this flight was hell. K2 Airways Cargo Boeing 737 Disappears Over Arabian Sea Near Karachi; Five Crew Missing Karachi, Pakistan — July 7, 2026 A K2 Airways cargo flight vanished from radar over the Arabian Sea on Tuesday night while approaching Pakistani airspace, prompting a major search-and-rescue operation for the five crew members on board. Flight KTA1732, a Boeing 737-400 freighter registered AP-BOI, departed Sharjah International Airport (SHJ) in the United Arab Emirates shortly after 15:00 UTC (around 20:00 PKT) bound for Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport (KHI). The aircraft disappeared approximately 155 nautical miles (about 287–300 km) west of Karachi, near the coastal town of Ormara in Balochistan. Timeline of Events: According to the Pakistan Airports Authority and preliminary ADS-B data from Flightradar24: • At approximately 21:18 PKT, the crew reported a navigation system issue to the Karachi Area Control Centre and requested assistance with course guidance. Air traffic controllers provided immediate support. • At 21:21 PKT, radar showed the aircraft entering a rapid descent accompanied by a sharp change in heading. • Radar and radio contact were lost shortly afterward. ADS-B tracking data revealed abnormal flight behavior in the final minutes: the aircraft experienced a significant loss of altitude, followed by a brief climb, and then a catastrophic descent. The final data point, recorded at 16:21 UTC, placed the aircraft at 1,100 feet above mean sea level with a vertical rate of -22,400 feet per minute — an extremely high rate of descent consistent with an uncontrolled situation. Ground speed had dropped to around 114 knots. Authorities have not yet released an official cause. Early reports noted some GNSS interference near Sharjah shortly after departure (which also affected other aircraft in the area), but tracking data resumed normally once the flight was over the Arabian Sea. Aircraft and Airline Background The Boeing 737-4M0(BDSF) freighter (MSN 29210) was a 27-year-old aircraft originally delivered to Aeroflot as a passenger jet in 1999. It later flew for Garuda Indonesia before being converted to a freighter in 2012. It subsequently operated with TNT Airways / ASL Airlines Belgium and briefly with FedEx Express before being delivered to K2 Airways in October 2024. K2 Airways, a Pakistani cargo startup, operated this aircraft as its sole freighter. The loss leaves the airline without an operational aircraft. The flight was carrying five crew members — all Pakistani nationals — and was operating as a cargo service (reportedly a ferry flight following maintenance in Sharjah with no freight on board).

The last couple minutes of this flight was hell. K2 Airways Cargo Boeing 737 Disappears Over Arabian Sea Near Karachi; Five Crew Missing Karachi, Pakistan — July 7, 2026 A K2 Airways cargo flight vanished from radar over the Arabian Sea on Tuesday night while approaching Pakistani airspace, prompting a major search-and-rescue operation for the five crew members on board. Flight KTA1732, a Boeing 737-400 freighter registered AP-BOI, departed Sharjah International Airport (SHJ) in the United Arab Emirates shortly after 15:00 UTC (around 20:00 PKT) bound for Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport (KHI). The aircraft disappeared approximately 155 nautical miles (about 287–300 km) west of Karachi, near the coastal town of Ormara in Balochistan. Timeline of Events: According to the Pakistan Airports Authority and preliminary ADS-B data from Flightradar24: • At approximately 21:18 PKT, the crew reported a navigation system issue to the Karachi Area Control Centre and requested assistance with course guidance. Air traffic controllers provided immediate support. • At 21:21 PKT, radar showed the aircraft entering a rapid descent accompanied by a sharp change in heading. • Radar and radio contact were lost shortly afterward. ADS-B tracking data revealed abnormal flight behavior in the final minutes: the aircraft experienced a significant loss of altitude, followed by a brief climb, and then a catastrophic descent. The final data point, recorded at 16:21 UTC, placed the aircraft at 1,100 feet above mean sea level with a vertical rate of -22,400 feet per minute — an extremely high rate of descent consistent with an uncontrolled situation. Ground speed had dropped to around 114 knots. Authorities have not yet released an official cause. Early reports noted some GNSS interference near Sharjah shortly after departure (which also affected other aircraft in the area), but tracking data resumed normally once the flight was over the Arabian Sea. Aircraft and Airline Background The Boeing 737-4M0(BDSF) freighter (MSN 29210) was a 27-year-old aircraft originally delivered to Aeroflot as a passenger jet in 1999. It later flew for Garuda Indonesia before being converted to a freighter in 2012. It subsequently operated with TNT Airways / ASL Airlines Belgium and briefly with FedEx Express before being delivered to K2 Airways in October 2024. K2 Airways, a Pakistani cargo startup, operated this aircraft as its sole freighter. The loss leaves the airline without an operational aircraft. The flight was carrying five crew members — all Pakistani nationals — and was operating as a cargo service (reportedly a ferry flight following maintenance in Sharjah with no freight on board).

SLCScanner

29,154 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

United Airlines Flight 811 (Boeing 747-122, registration N4713U) on February 24, 1989. It was a scheduled international flight from Los Angeles to Sydney, Australia, with stops in Honolulu, Hawaii, and Auckland, New Zealand. After an uneventful stop in Honolulu, the aircraft (with 337 passengers and 18 crew) took off around 1:52–1:53 a.m. local time, bound for Auckland. About 16–17 minutes after takeoff, while climbing through roughly 22,000–23,000 feet over the Pacific (around 60–100 miles south of Honolulu), the forward lower-lobe cargo door on the right side suddenly opened and separated. This caused an explosive decompression. The door swung outward with great force, tearing away a large section of the adjacent fuselage skin (roughly 10–20+ feet in key dimensions) and part of the cabin structure/floor above it. Nine passengers seated in the affected business-class rows (primarily seats in rows involving positions near the damage, such as around rows 8–12 on the right side) were ejected from the aircraft along with their seats and were lost at sea; their bodies were never recovered. Debris also damaged the two right-side engines (Nos. 3 and 4), which lost power or caught fire and had to be shut down, plus some flap and wing leading-edge damage. Several other people (including cabin crew) were injured. Captain David Cronin and the flight crew declared an emergency, turned back toward Honolulu, dumped fuel, and managed a successful emergency landing at Honolulu International Airport roughly 20–40 minutes after the event (landing around 2:30–2:33 a.m.). The remaining 346 people on board evacuated safely via slides. The aircraft sustained substantial damage but was later repaired and returned to service (re-registered as N4724U). Cause The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined the probable cause was the sudden in-flight opening of the forward cargo door, leading to the explosive decompression. This was attributed primarily to a faulty switch or wiring in the door control system that allowed electrical actuation of the latches toward the unlatched position after the door had been closed (and before or during the flight). A design deficiency in the cargo door’s locking mechanisms made them susceptible to deformation, allowing the door to unlatch even after proper latching and locking. A prior 1987 cargo-door incident on a Pan Am 747 and delayed corrective actions by Boeing and the FAA were also cited as contributing factors. An initial NTSB report leaned toward possible ground-crew latching issues (as the door was lost at sea and recovery took time), but recovery of the door from deep water (~14,000 feet) and further evidence (including a later related incident) led to the revised 1992 finding focused on the electrical/wiring fault and design weaknesses. The event is often remembered for the dramatic structural failure and successful return of the heavily damaged aircraft under difficult conditions (including storms in the area and the need to land overweight with limited systems). It prompted design and maintenance changes related to 747 cargo doors.

United Airlines Flight 811 (Boeing 747-122, registration N4713U) on February 24, 1989. It was a scheduled international flight from Los Angeles to Sydney, Australia, with stops in Honolulu, Hawaii, and Auckland, New Zealand. After an uneventful stop in Honolulu, the aircraft (with 337 passengers and 18 crew) took off around 1:52–1:53 a.m. local time, bound for Auckland. About 16–17 minutes after takeoff, while climbing through roughly 22,000–23,000 feet over the Pacific (around 60–100 miles south of Honolulu), the forward lower-lobe cargo door on the right side suddenly opened and separated. This caused an explosive decompression. The door swung outward with great force, tearing away a large section of the adjacent fuselage skin (roughly 10–20+ feet in key dimensions) and part of the cabin structure/floor above it. Nine passengers seated in the affected business-class rows (primarily seats in rows involving positions near the damage, such as around rows 8–12 on the right side) were ejected from the aircraft along with their seats and were lost at sea; their bodies were never recovered. Debris also damaged the two right-side engines (Nos. 3 and 4), which lost power or caught fire and had to be shut down, plus some flap and wing leading-edge damage. Several other people (including cabin crew) were injured. Captain David Cronin and the flight crew declared an emergency, turned back toward Honolulu, dumped fuel, and managed a successful emergency landing at Honolulu International Airport roughly 20–40 minutes after the event (landing around 2:30–2:33 a.m.). The remaining 346 people on board evacuated safely via slides. The aircraft sustained substantial damage but was later repaired and returned to service (re-registered as N4724U). Cause The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined the probable cause was the sudden in-flight opening of the forward cargo door, leading to the explosive decompression. This was attributed primarily to a faulty switch or wiring in the door control system that allowed electrical actuation of the latches toward the unlatched position after the door had been closed (and before or during the flight). A design deficiency in the cargo door’s locking mechanisms made them susceptible to deformation, allowing the door to unlatch even after proper latching and locking. A prior 1987 cargo-door incident on a Pan Am 747 and delayed corrective actions by Boeing and the FAA were also cited as contributing factors. An initial NTSB report leaned toward possible ground-crew latching issues (as the door was lost at sea and recovery took time), but recovery of the door from deep water (~14,000 feet) and further evidence (including a later related incident) led to the revised 1992 finding focused on the electrical/wiring fault and design weaknesses. The event is often remembered for the dramatic structural failure and successful return of the heavily damaged aircraft under difficult conditions (including storms in the area and the need to land overweight with limited systems). It prompted design and maintenance changes related to 747 cargo doors.

Shannon 🇺🇸I stand with America

207,541 просмотров • 6 дней назад

The Superiority of Russia’s S-400 Missile Systems & Su-30MKI Fighter Jets Russia’s defense industry's pinnacle of technological prowess, with the S-400 Triumf missile system & Su-30MKI fighter jet exemplifying engineering & combat effectiveness. These systems, rooted in decades of innovation, demonstrate Russia’s ability to produce cutting-edge military hardware that rivals & surpasses, Western counterparts in performance, reliability & strategic versatility. S-400 Triumf, developed by Almaz-Antey, is regarded as the world’s most advanced air defense system. Its ability to neutralize a broad spectrum of aerial threats—ranging from stealth aircraft, cruise missiles to ballistic missiles—sets it apart. The system’s 48N6E3 missiles can engage targets at ranges up to 250 kms, while the 40N6E extends this reach to 400 kilometers, offering unparalleled coverage A radar suite capable of tracking up to 300 targets simultaneously, including low-observable stealth platforms, the S-400’s situational awareness is unmatched. Its integration of multiple missile types allows it to counter diverse threats, from low-flying drones to hypersonic weapons, ensuring layered defense The system’s mobility, with rapid deployment & redeployment capabilities, enhances its survivability in dynamic battlefields. Unlike Western systems like the Patriot PAC-3, which struggle with limited engagement ranges & higher costs, the S-400 offers superior cost-effectiveness & adaptability, making it a cornerstone of Russian & allied air defense strategies. Equally formidable is the Su-30MKI, a multirole fighter jet developed by Sukhoi & tailored for the Indian Air Force, showcasing Russia’s ability to deliver customized, high-performance platforms. Powered by twin AL-31FP turbofan engines with thrust-vectoring nozzles, the Su-30MKI achieves supermaneuverability, enabling it to execute complex aerobatic maneuvers like the Pugachev’s Cobra, which Western fighters like the F-35 cannot replicate Top speed of Mach 2 & operational range of 3,000 kms without refueling provide strategic flexibility. The jet’s avionics suite, integrating the Bars phased-array radar, allows detection of targets at 200 kilometers, giving it a decisive edge in beyond-visual-range combat The Su-30MKI’s arsenal, including R-77 air-to-air missiles & BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, ensures dominance in both air superiority & ground-attack roles. The S-400 and Su-30MKI create a formidable defense-offense ecosystem S-400’s ability to protect airbases & strategic assets allows Su-30MKIs to operate with reduced risk, projecting power deep into contested airspace. This combination has been a game-changer for nations like India, which leverages these systems to counter regional threats effectively S-400’s export to countries like China & Turkey underscores its global demand, driven by its proven reliability & resistance to electronic countermeasures, unlike Western systems that often rely on untested stealth countermeasures Critics of Western systems often highlight their high costs & limited adaptability. For instance, the F-35’s exorbitant price tag & maintenance issues pale in comparison to the Su-30MKI’s cost-efficiency & combat-proven track record. Similarly, the S-400’s ability to integrate with legacy systems gives it an edge over the Patriot’s restrictive architecture. Russia’s focus on rugged, versatile designs ensures these systems perform in diverse environments, from Arctic cold to desert heat, without the logistical burdens plaguing Western alternatives In conclusion, the S-400 & Su-30MKI represent the zenith of military technology, blending innovation, firepower & affordability Global adoption & battlefield success cement Russia’s position as a leader in defense systems, outclassing Western competitors in both strategic depth & operational effectiveness. These platforms not only secure national sovereignty but also redefine modern warfare with unmatched precision & power

The Superiority of Russia’s S-400 Missile Systems & Su-30MKI Fighter Jets Russia’s defense industry's pinnacle of technological prowess, with the S-400 Triumf missile system & Su-30MKI fighter jet exemplifying engineering & combat effectiveness. These systems, rooted in decades of innovation, demonstrate Russia’s ability to produce cutting-edge military hardware that rivals & surpasses, Western counterparts in performance, reliability & strategic versatility. S-400 Triumf, developed by Almaz-Antey, is regarded as the world’s most advanced air defense system. Its ability to neutralize a broad spectrum of aerial threats—ranging from stealth aircraft, cruise missiles to ballistic missiles—sets it apart. The system’s 48N6E3 missiles can engage targets at ranges up to 250 kms, while the 40N6E extends this reach to 400 kilometers, offering unparalleled coverage A radar suite capable of tracking up to 300 targets simultaneously, including low-observable stealth platforms, the S-400’s situational awareness is unmatched. Its integration of multiple missile types allows it to counter diverse threats, from low-flying drones to hypersonic weapons, ensuring layered defense The system’s mobility, with rapid deployment & redeployment capabilities, enhances its survivability in dynamic battlefields. Unlike Western systems like the Patriot PAC-3, which struggle with limited engagement ranges & higher costs, the S-400 offers superior cost-effectiveness & adaptability, making it a cornerstone of Russian & allied air defense strategies. Equally formidable is the Su-30MKI, a multirole fighter jet developed by Sukhoi & tailored for the Indian Air Force, showcasing Russia’s ability to deliver customized, high-performance platforms. Powered by twin AL-31FP turbofan engines with thrust-vectoring nozzles, the Su-30MKI achieves supermaneuverability, enabling it to execute complex aerobatic maneuvers like the Pugachev’s Cobra, which Western fighters like the F-35 cannot replicate Top speed of Mach 2 & operational range of 3,000 kms without refueling provide strategic flexibility. The jet’s avionics suite, integrating the Bars phased-array radar, allows detection of targets at 200 kilometers, giving it a decisive edge in beyond-visual-range combat The Su-30MKI’s arsenal, including R-77 air-to-air missiles & BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, ensures dominance in both air superiority & ground-attack roles. The S-400 and Su-30MKI create a formidable defense-offense ecosystem S-400’s ability to protect airbases & strategic assets allows Su-30MKIs to operate with reduced risk, projecting power deep into contested airspace. This combination has been a game-changer for nations like India, which leverages these systems to counter regional threats effectively S-400’s export to countries like China & Turkey underscores its global demand, driven by its proven reliability & resistance to electronic countermeasures, unlike Western systems that often rely on untested stealth countermeasures Critics of Western systems often highlight their high costs & limited adaptability. For instance, the F-35’s exorbitant price tag & maintenance issues pale in comparison to the Su-30MKI’s cost-efficiency & combat-proven track record. Similarly, the S-400’s ability to integrate with legacy systems gives it an edge over the Patriot’s restrictive architecture. Russia’s focus on rugged, versatile designs ensures these systems perform in diverse environments, from Arctic cold to desert heat, without the logistical burdens plaguing Western alternatives In conclusion, the S-400 & Su-30MKI represent the zenith of military technology, blending innovation, firepower & affordability Global adoption & battlefield success cement Russia’s position as a leader in defense systems, outclassing Western competitors in both strategic depth & operational effectiveness. These platforms not only secure national sovereignty but also redefine modern warfare with unmatched precision & power

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇮🇪

46,473 просмотров • 1 год назад

The front section of the Air India flight that crashed shortly after taking off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad landed on the roof of the resident doctors’ hostel at BJ Medical College. The London-bound flight was carrying 242 people. Among them were 169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, one Canadian national, and seven Portuguese nationals. Air India’s statement released at 3:19 PM IST on 12 June 2025 reads: “Air India confirms that flight AI171, from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, was involved in an accident today after take-off. The flight, which departed from Ahmedabad at 1338 hrs, was carrying 242 passengers and crew members on board the Boeing 787-8 aircraft. Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 are British nationals, 1 Canadian national and 7 Portuguese nationals. The injured are being taken to the nearest hospitals. We have also set up a dedicated passenger hotline number 1800 5691 444 to provide more information. Air India is giving its full cooperation to the authorities investigating this incident.” The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) statement, released at 2:38 PM IST on 12 June 2025, says: “The aircraft departed from Ahmedabad at 13:39 IST. It gave a Mayday call to ATC, after which there was no further response from the aircraft.” Union Home Minister Amit Shah reacted to the news on X at 3:31 PM IST before leaving for Ahmedabad: “Pained beyond words by the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad. Disaster response forces have been quickly rushed to the crash site. Spoke with the Gujarat Chief Minister Shri Bhupendra Patel, Home Minister Shri Harsh Sanghavi, and Commissioner of Police Ahmedabad to assess the situation.” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on X at 4:05 PM IST, “The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words. In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected.”

The front section of the Air India flight that crashed shortly after taking off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad landed on the roof of the resident doctors’ hostel at BJ Medical College. The London-bound flight was carrying 242 people. Among them were 169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, one Canadian national, and seven Portuguese nationals. Air India’s statement released at 3:19 PM IST on 12 June 2025 reads: “Air India confirms that flight AI171, from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, was involved in an accident today after take-off. The flight, which departed from Ahmedabad at 1338 hrs, was carrying 242 passengers and crew members on board the Boeing 787-8 aircraft. Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 are British nationals, 1 Canadian national and 7 Portuguese nationals. The injured are being taken to the nearest hospitals. We have also set up a dedicated passenger hotline number 1800 5691 444 to provide more information. Air India is giving its full cooperation to the authorities investigating this incident.” The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) statement, released at 2:38 PM IST on 12 June 2025, says: “The aircraft departed from Ahmedabad at 13:39 IST. It gave a Mayday call to ATC, after which there was no further response from the aircraft.” Union Home Minister Amit Shah reacted to the news on X at 3:31 PM IST before leaving for Ahmedabad: “Pained beyond words by the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad. Disaster response forces have been quickly rushed to the crash site. Spoke with the Gujarat Chief Minister Shri Bhupendra Patel, Home Minister Shri Harsh Sanghavi, and Commissioner of Police Ahmedabad to assess the situation.” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on X at 4:05 PM IST, “The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words. In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected.”

Brut India

201,900 просмотров • 1 год назад

DROPS E20: Web3 Philosopher - founder of Hyperbridge reshaping how blockchains talk to each other. We talk about: - Building cross-chain infrastructure that acts like undersea cables for crypto - The failures of traditional bridges and how HyperBridge removes trust from the system - Lessons from working with Ethereum & Polkadot co-founder Gavin Wood - Why decentralisation and openness aren’t optional - they’re survival - How growing up in Nigeria shaped Seun’s drive to build trustless systems - The philosophy behind building open, verifiable systems - and rejecting gatekeeping And much more! Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 1:36 Welcome To Drops 2:13 Language Attraction 3:08 Where Math Brain Comes From 4:40 Explain What You Do 6:04 Deeper Into Internet Example 7:35 Who Are You 8:41 Favorite Philosopher 10:30 Something To Build Trust 11:54 Chip On The Shoulder 14:36 How To Make Things Happen 17:39 Working With Ethereum Co-Founder 19:57 Self Teaching Blockchain Technology 21:15 One Lesson On Infrastructure 23:45 Something Gavin Doesn’t Understand 26:57 What The Hacks Exposed 30:00 What’s The Breakthrough 31:13 Analogy For HyperBridge To Click 34:08 No One’s Figured This Out, Why? 36:02 Going About Business Development 40:08 Why Bridges Are Necessary 40:36 Convincing Teams To Bet On You 42:05 Thinking Behind HyperBridge's Openness 44:08 Making HyperBridge A Sustainable System 44:49 Your Pitch To Convince Investors

DROPS E20: Web3 Philosopher - founder of Hyperbridge reshaping how blockchains talk to each other. We talk about: - Building cross-chain infrastructure that acts like undersea cables for crypto - The failures of traditional bridges and how HyperBridge removes trust from the system - Lessons from working with Ethereum & Polkadot co-founder Gavin Wood - Why decentralisation and openness aren’t optional - they’re survival - How growing up in Nigeria shaped Seun’s drive to build trustless systems - The philosophy behind building open, verifiable systems - and rejecting gatekeeping And much more! Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 1:36 Welcome To Drops 2:13 Language Attraction 3:08 Where Math Brain Comes From 4:40 Explain What You Do 6:04 Deeper Into Internet Example 7:35 Who Are You 8:41 Favorite Philosopher 10:30 Something To Build Trust 11:54 Chip On The Shoulder 14:36 How To Make Things Happen 17:39 Working With Ethereum Co-Founder 19:57 Self Teaching Blockchain Technology 21:15 One Lesson On Infrastructure 23:45 Something Gavin Doesn’t Understand 26:57 What The Hacks Exposed 30:00 What’s The Breakthrough 31:13 Analogy For HyperBridge To Click 34:08 No One’s Figured This Out, Why? 36:02 Going About Business Development 40:08 Why Bridges Are Necessary 40:36 Convincing Teams To Bet On You 42:05 Thinking Behind HyperBridge's Openness 44:08 Making HyperBridge A Sustainable System 44:49 Your Pitch To Convince Investors

MR SHIFT 🦁

109,913 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

GOV OWNS MULTIPLE PATENTS - How To Steer & Control Hurricanes & Tornadoes Here are some key patents related to weather modification, specifically focusing on hurricane and tornado control: 1. Publication No. 20120024972 Title: Apparatus for Reducing the Intensity of a Cyclone Description: This patent involves a device that floats on water and uses a pump to spray cooler water from deeper parts of the ocean into the atmosphere. This is aimed at cooling the air, which can reduce the intensity of cyclones by depriving them of the warm air that fuels their strength. 2. Publication No. 20110284649 Title: Apparatus and Method for the Mitigation of Rotating Wind Storms Description: This method aims to weaken tornadoes by creating a rising column of warm air in the storm's path, which disrupts the atmospheric conditions that feed the tornado. It uses a combination of heaters and fans to cool the earth and surrounding air, reducing the tornado’s strength. 3. Publication No. 20110198407 Title: Method and Apparatus to Break Up or Annihilate Typhoons, Tornadoes, Cyclones, or Hurricanes Description: This invention proposes using controlled implosions to break up air and water systems that form destructive storms like hurricanes and tornadoes. It absorbs forced air and water displaced by these natural phenomena and breaks them down through implosion. 4. Publication No. 20110174892 Title: Apparatus and Related Methods for Weather Modification by Electrical Processes in the Atmosphere Description: This patent focuses on using electrical charges to modify weather patterns. The apparatus generates an electric charge at high altitudes to influence atmospheric conditions and could be used to increase precipitation or manipulate other weather elements. 5. Publication No. 20110168797 Title: Method of Weakening a Hurricane Description: This method suggests disrupting the eye of a hurricane by either inducing rainfall in the surrounding areas or using absorbent materials like oatmeal to reduce moisture in the storm. It also proposes cooling the air in front of the hurricane to slow its development. 6. US Patent No. 20060201547A1 Title: Hurricane Control via Alteration of Inner Water Vapor Content Description: This patent discusses methods to reduce a hurricane’s strength by altering the water vapor content within the hurricane's eye wall. The idea is to introduce a substance that absorbs moisture, thereby disrupting the storm's fuel source—warm, moist air. 7. US Patent No. 4712155 Title: Method of Controlling Weather Description: This patent focuses on using microwave energy to manipulate the weather, including hurricanes. It proposes directing microwaves to specific areas of the atmosphere to heat or cool air masses, potentially altering weather patterns, including storms. 8. US Patent No. 3564253A Title: System and Method for Irradiation of Planetary Atmosphere Description: This patent describes irradiating the upper layers of the atmosphere to alter weather patterns. While not specific to hurricanes, this method could be used to impact large-scale atmospheric conditions and potentially prevent or mitigate hurricane formation. 9. US Patent No. 20030085296A1 Title: Hurricane and Tornado Control Device Method: Uses sound waves to steer, disrupt, or enhance the formation of hurricanes and tornadoes. 10. US Patent No. 20060201547A1 Title: Hurricane Control via Alteration of Inner Water Vapor Content Method: Reduces hurricane strength by altering water vapor content in the eye wall. 11. US Patent No. 4712155 Title: Method of Controlling Weather Method: Uses microwave energy to manipulate weather, including hurricanes. 12. US Patent No. 3564253A Title: System and Method for Irradiation of Planetary Atmosphere Method: Proposes irradiating the atmosphere to alter weather patterns, including preventing hurricanes. 🎥 In2ThinAir #HurricaneControl #WeatherModification #PatentTech #HurricaneHelene #StormSteering #ClimateEngineering

GOV OWNS MULTIPLE PATENTS - How To Steer & Control Hurricanes & Tornadoes Here are some key patents related to weather modification, specifically focusing on hurricane and tornado control: 1. Publication No. 20120024972 Title: Apparatus for Reducing the Intensity of a Cyclone Description: This patent involves a device that floats on water and uses a pump to spray cooler water from deeper parts of the ocean into the atmosphere. This is aimed at cooling the air, which can reduce the intensity of cyclones by depriving them of the warm air that fuels their strength. 2. Publication No. 20110284649 Title: Apparatus and Method for the Mitigation of Rotating Wind Storms Description: This method aims to weaken tornadoes by creating a rising column of warm air in the storm's path, which disrupts the atmospheric conditions that feed the tornado. It uses a combination of heaters and fans to cool the earth and surrounding air, reducing the tornado’s strength. 3. Publication No. 20110198407 Title: Method and Apparatus to Break Up or Annihilate Typhoons, Tornadoes, Cyclones, or Hurricanes Description: This invention proposes using controlled implosions to break up air and water systems that form destructive storms like hurricanes and tornadoes. It absorbs forced air and water displaced by these natural phenomena and breaks them down through implosion. 4. Publication No. 20110174892 Title: Apparatus and Related Methods for Weather Modification by Electrical Processes in the Atmosphere Description: This patent focuses on using electrical charges to modify weather patterns. The apparatus generates an electric charge at high altitudes to influence atmospheric conditions and could be used to increase precipitation or manipulate other weather elements. 5. Publication No. 20110168797 Title: Method of Weakening a Hurricane Description: This method suggests disrupting the eye of a hurricane by either inducing rainfall in the surrounding areas or using absorbent materials like oatmeal to reduce moisture in the storm. It also proposes cooling the air in front of the hurricane to slow its development. 6. US Patent No. 20060201547A1 Title: Hurricane Control via Alteration of Inner Water Vapor Content Description: This patent discusses methods to reduce a hurricane’s strength by altering the water vapor content within the hurricane's eye wall. The idea is to introduce a substance that absorbs moisture, thereby disrupting the storm's fuel source—warm, moist air. 7. US Patent No. 4712155 Title: Method of Controlling Weather Description: This patent focuses on using microwave energy to manipulate the weather, including hurricanes. It proposes directing microwaves to specific areas of the atmosphere to heat or cool air masses, potentially altering weather patterns, including storms. 8. US Patent No. 3564253A Title: System and Method for Irradiation of Planetary Atmosphere Description: This patent describes irradiating the upper layers of the atmosphere to alter weather patterns. While not specific to hurricanes, this method could be used to impact large-scale atmospheric conditions and potentially prevent or mitigate hurricane formation. 9. US Patent No. 20030085296A1 Title: Hurricane and Tornado Control Device Method: Uses sound waves to steer, disrupt, or enhance the formation of hurricanes and tornadoes. 10. US Patent No. 20060201547A1 Title: Hurricane Control via Alteration of Inner Water Vapor Content Method: Reduces hurricane strength by altering water vapor content in the eye wall. 11. US Patent No. 4712155 Title: Method of Controlling Weather Method: Uses microwave energy to manipulate weather, including hurricanes. 12. US Patent No. 3564253A Title: System and Method for Irradiation of Planetary Atmosphere Method: Proposes irradiating the atmosphere to alter weather patterns, including preventing hurricanes. 🎥 In2ThinAir #HurricaneControl #WeatherModification #PatentTech #HurricaneHelene #StormSteering #ClimateEngineering

Kristy Tallman

28,331 просмотров • 1 год назад

I joined Erin Burnett OutFront / Erin Burnett last night to discuss hantavirus and the cruise ship outbreak. Some thoughts: THE SITUATION ON THE SHIP IS SERIOUS My first thoughts were about the good doctor who was on-air right before me, and the rest of the people still on the ship. Hantavirus is serious with a long incubation period, several have died already, and this strain spreads human-human (not just rodents). The ship's doctor got sick, and this doc stepped up to treat people on the ship. He described protections he was taking (goggles, gown, hand-washing), but they were insufficient because there is evidence this virus spreads beyond "close contact", which means ventilation and filtration are important. THE RISK AND THREAT TO GENERAL PUBLIC IS LOW Despite the situation being serious on this ship, the system is working the way it should. Health officials are investigating and tracing, severely ill passengers are being treated, passengers who left the ship are notified and in quarantine. For the general public, the threat is low. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF HUMAN-HUMAN SPREAD AND TRANSMISSION BEYOND "CLOSE CONTACT" I've read a lot of people say this can only be spread via "close contact", but there is evidence that is not the case. The best information we have about hantavirus spreading human-human (Andes strain, same one as the cruise ship outbreak) comes from a meticulous study about a past outbreak that wasn't a cruise ship. I read the paper (and the supplement, which is where the good info always is...). There are many examples of transmission without "close contact": Patient 1 --> Patient 4 "did not have any physical contact and simply said “hello” to each other as they crossed paths" Patient 1 --> Patients 3 & 6 "seated at different tables and spatially separated by 1–2 m" Patient 2 --> Patient 11 "No direct or close contact between the two patients was reported." Patient 8 --> Patient 28 "Patient 8 shared a room with Patient 28 and her relative. Patient 28 and Patient 8 did were not in close contact." OTHER IMPORTANT DETAILS IN THAT PRIOR OUTBREAK -In that outbreak, one person infected 5 at a birthday party. One of those infected then infected his wife. He died, and his wife infected 10 more at her husband's funeral/wake. -They got the outbreak under control by strict isolation and quarantine, with people having to stay home for 40 days with no contact with others. CHALLENGES, AND WHAT I'M WATCHING -The long incubation period (several weeks) means it will take some time to know if others get sick, or if we have had any secondary transmission after the boat (29 people from the boat already returned home, but are still within the incubation period). -There is one report of a flight attendant hospitalized/ill, but it's not clear if they have hantavirus. Someone with hantavirus boarded a flight *but was removed from the plane before takeoff* because they were so sick. So, if transmission did happen, it happened in that one hour while the plane was on the ground.

I joined Erin Burnett OutFront / Erin Burnett last night to discuss hantavirus and the cruise ship outbreak. Some thoughts: THE SITUATION ON THE SHIP IS SERIOUS My first thoughts were about the good doctor who was on-air right before me, and the rest of the people still on the ship. Hantavirus is serious with a long incubation period, several have died already, and this strain spreads human-human (not just rodents). The ship's doctor got sick, and this doc stepped up to treat people on the ship. He described protections he was taking (goggles, gown, hand-washing), but they were insufficient because there is evidence this virus spreads beyond "close contact", which means ventilation and filtration are important. THE RISK AND THREAT TO GENERAL PUBLIC IS LOW Despite the situation being serious on this ship, the system is working the way it should. Health officials are investigating and tracing, severely ill passengers are being treated, passengers who left the ship are notified and in quarantine. For the general public, the threat is low. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF HUMAN-HUMAN SPREAD AND TRANSMISSION BEYOND "CLOSE CONTACT" I've read a lot of people say this can only be spread via "close contact", but there is evidence that is not the case. The best information we have about hantavirus spreading human-human (Andes strain, same one as the cruise ship outbreak) comes from a meticulous study about a past outbreak that wasn't a cruise ship. I read the paper (and the supplement, which is where the good info always is...). There are many examples of transmission without "close contact": Patient 1 --> Patient 4 "did not have any physical contact and simply said “hello” to each other as they crossed paths" Patient 1 --> Patients 3 & 6 "seated at different tables and spatially separated by 1–2 m" Patient 2 --> Patient 11 "No direct or close contact between the two patients was reported." Patient 8 --> Patient 28 "Patient 8 shared a room with Patient 28 and her relative. Patient 28 and Patient 8 did were not in close contact." OTHER IMPORTANT DETAILS IN THAT PRIOR OUTBREAK -In that outbreak, one person infected 5 at a birthday party. One of those infected then infected his wife. He died, and his wife infected 10 more at her husband's funeral/wake. -They got the outbreak under control by strict isolation and quarantine, with people having to stay home for 40 days with no contact with others. CHALLENGES, AND WHAT I'M WATCHING -The long incubation period (several weeks) means it will take some time to know if others get sick, or if we have had any secondary transmission after the boat (29 people from the boat already returned home, but are still within the incubation period). -There is one report of a flight attendant hospitalized/ill, but it's not clear if they have hantavirus. Someone with hantavirus boarded a flight but was removed from the plane before takeoff because they were so sick. So, if transmission did happen, it happened in that one hour while the plane was on the ground.

Joseph Allen

44,368 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨SHOCKING EXPOSE: US Army Spy Plane Caught Deploying DRONES Over Charlie Kirk Assassination Site – N1098L Crew Names Match Scrubbed NSCC List! 🕵️‍♂️ fresh TIP from my bro HolonCitizen reveals new details pertaining to what happened on Sept. 10, 2025—the EXACT day Charlie was assassinated—a US Army spy plane (tail N1098L, callsign AXLE10, HADES ISR program) executed suspicious maneuvers over UVU, Orem, UT—timed precisely around Charlie's 12:23 MT assassination. Designed for mid-air drone launch/recovery logs show. The plane took off from Biggs Army Airfield, TX—the closest military airfield to Fort Huachuca (AZ) capable of handling this jet. Fort Huachuca, the U.S. Army's premier unmanned aircraft systems (UAS/drone) training and operations center, specializes in military drones—making this origin highly suspicious. Especially when plut in context with all the other connections we have to Fort Huachuca being tied to the planning the assassination of Charlie Kirk as well as Erika and her mom's deep military ties to that base. The plane then made two low-altitude passes: Dropped to 203 ft AGL, slowed to 116 knots (stall speed)—standard for drone ops. Pass 1: ~9:16 AM MT, 1 mile from UVU (pre-hit). Looped oddly over nearby lake. Pass 2: 25 mins post-assassination (~12:48 MT), same dive 1 mile away (potential recovery). Event footage shows sophisticated military drone-like objects (150 mph speeds, vertical climbs—not birds or consumer recreational drones). Was surveillance involved? Additional red flags: Alleged flight crew from September 10 (FBI should release the full manifest for verification): Flight Crew Names: Michael Harlan (Pilot in Command) Elena Vasquez (Mission Eng/Observer Avionics Specialist) J. "Jax" E. Donovan (Second Pilot) We also discovred that The National Security Studies Center (NSCC at UVU—potential intelligence ties) has a building directly adjacent to campus and along the shooter's reported escape path. A list of NSCC-associated names was publicly available but suspiciously scrubbed online on September 28, 2025, after scrutiny: NSCC Names: Mark Harlan Dr. Elena Vasquez Jamal Reid Rusty Needs Sarah Klein T Ramirez L Patel Note the overlaps: "Michael Harlan" (pilot) and "Mark Harlan" (NSCC)—typo, relatives, or the same person? Dr. Elena Vasquez appears on both lists. This demands explanation. Further suspicion: Google Trends data shows spikes in searches for these uncommon names from Israeli IP addresses just before Charlie Kirk's death—aligning with known planning windows (Nov-Dec 2024; Jun-Aug 2025) based on trends for other related figures (surgeons, UVU police, Hunter Kozak, George Zinn, FBI Salt Lake director, etc.). Suspicious drones? Spy planes? Overlaps? Name spikes in Israel? Google searches during planning windows (Nov-Dec 2024; Jun-Aug 2025)? CIA/NSCC Ties? No accusations—demanding answers: Drones for monitoring? Foreign intel role? Who authorized? Credit: HolonCitizen Be sure FOLLOW him for further analysis. Tag Candace Owens & RT for transparency!

🚨SHOCKING EXPOSE: US Army Spy Plane Caught Deploying DRONES Over Charlie Kirk Assassination Site – N1098L Crew Names Match Scrubbed NSCC List! 🕵️‍♂️ fresh TIP from my bro HolonCitizen reveals new details pertaining to what happened on Sept. 10, 2025—the EXACT day Charlie was assassinated—a US Army spy plane (tail N1098L, callsign AXLE10, HADES ISR program) executed suspicious maneuvers over UVU, Orem, UT—timed precisely around Charlie's 12:23 MT assassination. Designed for mid-air drone launch/recovery logs show. The plane took off from Biggs Army Airfield, TX—the closest military airfield to Fort Huachuca (AZ) capable of handling this jet. Fort Huachuca, the U.S. Army's premier unmanned aircraft systems (UAS/drone) training and operations center, specializes in military drones—making this origin highly suspicious. Especially when plut in context with all the other connections we have to Fort Huachuca being tied to the planning the assassination of Charlie Kirk as well as Erika and her mom's deep military ties to that base. The plane then made two low-altitude passes: Dropped to 203 ft AGL, slowed to 116 knots (stall speed)—standard for drone ops. Pass 1: ~9:16 AM MT, 1 mile from UVU (pre-hit). Looped oddly over nearby lake. Pass 2: 25 mins post-assassination (~12:48 MT), same dive 1 mile away (potential recovery). Event footage shows sophisticated military drone-like objects (150 mph speeds, vertical climbs—not birds or consumer recreational drones). Was surveillance involved? Additional red flags: Alleged flight crew from September 10 (FBI should release the full manifest for verification): Flight Crew Names: Michael Harlan (Pilot in Command) Elena Vasquez (Mission Eng/Observer Avionics Specialist) J. "Jax" E. Donovan (Second Pilot) We also discovred that The National Security Studies Center (NSCC at UVU—potential intelligence ties) has a building directly adjacent to campus and along the shooter's reported escape path. A list of NSCC-associated names was publicly available but suspiciously scrubbed online on September 28, 2025, after scrutiny: NSCC Names: Mark Harlan Dr. Elena Vasquez Jamal Reid Rusty Needs Sarah Klein T Ramirez L Patel Note the overlaps: "Michael Harlan" (pilot) and "Mark Harlan" (NSCC)—typo, relatives, or the same person? Dr. Elena Vasquez appears on both lists. This demands explanation. Further suspicion: Google Trends data shows spikes in searches for these uncommon names from Israeli IP addresses just before Charlie Kirk's death—aligning with known planning windows (Nov-Dec 2024; Jun-Aug 2025) based on trends for other related figures (surgeons, UVU police, Hunter Kozak, George Zinn, FBI Salt Lake director, etc.). Suspicious drones? Spy planes? Overlaps? Name spikes in Israel? Google searches during planning windows (Nov-Dec 2024; Jun-Aug 2025)? CIA/NSCC Ties? No accusations—demanding answers: Drones for monitoring? Foreign intel role? Who authorized? Credit: HolonCitizen Be sure FOLLOW him for further analysis. Tag Candace Owens & RT for transparency!

Project Constitution

79,464 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I spent 10 years in burnout. I've finally figured it all out. Understanding Burnout: The Five Interlocking Systems Burnout is a complex syndrome that affects millions of people, yet remains poorly understood by mainstream medicine. This comprehensive guide explores what burnout really is - not simply "being tired" or "needing a vacation," but a profound physiological state involving five interconnected bodily systems. By understanding these systems and how they interact, you can better navigate your path to recovery. What Burnout Really Feels Like If you've experienced burnout, you know it's far more than just feeling tired. You might have days where you feel relatively normal, followed by days where getting off the couch seems impossible. Your body might suddenly develop strange sensitivities - foods you've enjoyed your whole life now cause digestive distress, or you find yourself constantly too hot or too cold. Sleep becomes elusive despite extreme fatigue. Your thinking becomes foggy, your memory unreliable, and your emotions more volatile. These aren't just random symptoms - they're the result of multiple bodily systems being thrown into dysfunction by prolonged stress. Many people with burnout report unexplained physical symptoms: diffuse pain throughout the body, inflammation in unexpected places (like chronic sinus issues), dizziness when standing up (POTS), and a general sense that their body simply isn't working correctly. If these experiences sound familiar, you're not imagining things, and you're not alone. Why Burnout Is So Misunderstood Modern medicine excels at addressing acute problems with clear causes and treatments, but struggles with complex multi-system conditions like burnout. Most doctors receive minimal training on chronic conditions, and virtually none on how different bodily systems interact in states of prolonged stress. When you visit a specialist, they examine only their area of expertise - a gastroenterologist looks at digestive issues, a neurologist at brain symptoms - but rarely does anyone look at the full picture. This fragmented approach leads to medical gaslighting - being told "your labs are normal, it must be stress" or "this sounds like depression" without investigating the underlying physiological causes. Some providers dismiss "adrenal fatigue" as pseudoscience, despite extensive research on HPA axis dysfunction (the medical term for what many call adrenal fatigue). Others will acknowledge only the most extreme manifestations like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, missing opportunities for earlier intervention. The Five Systems Behind Burnout Burnout involves five primary overlapping systems that become dysfunctional or dysregulated. Understanding these systems is key to addressing the root causes rather than just managing symptoms. 1. HPA Axis Dysfunction The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is your body's main stress response pathway. This system connects your brain to your adrenal glands and regulates energy, stress hormones, and your ability to adapt to challenges. When chronically activated, this system eventually loses its ability to respond appropriately. This dysfunction manifests as cortisol irregularities - either producing too little overall, or producing it at the wrong times. If you struggle to wake up in the morning, you might have insufficient morning cortisol. If you wake too early and can't fall back asleep, you might have inappropriate early cortisol spikes. Recovery from HPA axis dysfunction typically takes 6 months to 2 years, with severe cases taking 3-5 years. 2. Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Dysfunction Your autonomic nervous system controls unconscious bodily functions like heart rate, blood pressure, digestion, and temperature regulation. Burnout can cause dysautonomia - a state where your sympathetic ("fight-or-flight") system becomes dominant, while your parasympathetic ("rest-and-digest") system becomes underactive. Symptoms include heart palpitations, dizziness when standing up, temperature regulation problems, digestive motility issues (feeling like food sits in your stomach for hours), and heightened sensitivity to environmental stimuli. Getting "stuck" in sympathetic dominance keeps your body in a state of hypervigilance, preventing proper rest and recovery. 3. Gastrointestinal System Dysfunction Your digestive system is often called your "second brain" for good reason - it produces 90% of your serotonin and houses its own nervous system (the enteric nervous system). The gut plays a critical role in immune function and overall health. Burnout can affect your gut through several mechanisms: chronic stress can impair the gut lining (leading to "leaky gut"), infections like H. pylori can cause inflammation, and your microbiome (the trillions of bacteria in your digestive system) can become imbalanced. When your gut is compromised, the effects ripple throughout your entire body, causing nutrient deficiencies, systemic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and altered neurotransmitter production that affects mood and cognition. 4. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Mitochondria are the power plants of your cells, producing the energy currency (ATP) that fuels all cellular activities. During burnout, these vital organelles become damaged and less efficient. Their internal structures (cristae) can physically deform, and they shift to less efficient energy production methods. The result is profound fatigue at a cellular level - your body literally cannot produce enough energy to function optimally. Every tissue, organ, and system feels the effects of this energy deficit. The good news is that mitochondria can recover with proper support, as they contain their own DNA and can regenerate when given the right conditions. 5. Immune System Dysfunction Your immune system becomes dysregulated during burnout, often becoming simultaneously overactive in some ways and underactive in others. This paradoxical state can manifest as frequent infections (showing immune weakness) alongside inflammatory conditions and hypersensitivities (showing immune overactivity). Chronic inflammation becomes a persistent problem, creating a constant state of low-grade immune activation that further drains your energy resources and affects brain function, healing ability, and overall wellbeing. Many people with burnout develop new sensitivities to foods, chemicals, or environments that never bothered them before. The Vicious Cycle and Downward Spiral What makes burnout particularly challenging is how these five systems interact and reinforce each other's dysfunction. HPA axis problems disrupt sleep, which impairs mitochondrial recovery. Gut issues create inflammation that triggers immune responses and stresses the HPA axis further. Mitochondrial dysfunction means less energy for healing and proper system function. Minor burnout can resolve on its own with sufficient rest and stress reduction. However, once a certain threshold is crossed, these systems keep each other sick in a self-perpetuating cycle. Without targeted interventions addressing each affected system, recovery becomes extremely difficult or impossible. This explains why some people remain burned out for years or decades despite their best efforts to rest and reduce stress. Navigating Medical Support Unfortunately, most healthcare providers aren't equipped to address burnout as a multi-system condition. This means you must often become your own health advocate and case manager. Some strategies include: When seeking medical help, speak the language of the specialist you're consulting. Instead of saying "adrenal fatigue" (which many doctors dismiss), use terms like "HPA axis dysfunction" or "dysautonomia" that align with medical terminology. Request appropriate testing. Standard bloodwork often misses the markers of burnout. More specialized tests like comprehensive stool analyses, organic acid tests, or cortisol rhythm testing can reveal the underlying issues. Consider working with integrative or functional medicine practitioners who are more likely to understand complex, multi-system conditions. However, be cautious, as quality varies widely in these fields. Remember that your experience is real and valid, even when healthcare providers can't immediately identify the cause. Persistent advocacy may be necessary to get the support you need. Recovery Is Possible But Takes Time Recovering from burnout is a gradual process that cannot be rushed. In fact, trying to accelerate recovery through sheer willpower often backfires, causing setbacks and prolonging the journey. The first rule of burnout recovery is "don't make it worse" - which means avoiding overexertion, respecting your body's current limitations, and prioritizing rest and healing above productivity. Recovery requires addressing all affected systems simultaneously through a combination of lifestyle changes, targeted supplements, stress management, diet modifications, and sometimes medications. This process is highly individualized - what works for one person may not work for another due to genetic differences, varying dietary needs, different lifestyle factors, and unique personal circumstances. The journey to recovery often requires significant changes to how you live and work. It may mean rethinking career choices, relationship dynamics, living situations, and fundamental priorities. While challenging, this process can ultimately lead to a more sustainable and fulfilling life built on a deeper understanding of your body's needs. Conclusion Burnout is not a character flaw or a sign of weakness - it's a complex physiological condition involving multiple bodily systems. By understanding the five key systems involved and how they interact, you can begin to address the root causes rather than just managing symptoms. Recovery is possible, but it requires patience, persistence, and a willingness to make meaningful changes. The path forward involves supporting your body's natural healing processes while avoiding the patterns that led to burnout in the first place. With the right approach, you can not only recover from burnout but emerge with greater resilience and a more balanced relationship with stress.

I spent 10 years in burnout. I've finally figured it all out. Understanding Burnout: The Five Interlocking Systems Burnout is a complex syndrome that affects millions of people, yet remains poorly understood by mainstream medicine. This comprehensive guide explores what burnout really is - not simply "being tired" or "needing a vacation," but a profound physiological state involving five interconnected bodily systems. By understanding these systems and how they interact, you can better navigate your path to recovery. What Burnout Really Feels Like If you've experienced burnout, you know it's far more than just feeling tired. You might have days where you feel relatively normal, followed by days where getting off the couch seems impossible. Your body might suddenly develop strange sensitivities - foods you've enjoyed your whole life now cause digestive distress, or you find yourself constantly too hot or too cold. Sleep becomes elusive despite extreme fatigue. Your thinking becomes foggy, your memory unreliable, and your emotions more volatile. These aren't just random symptoms - they're the result of multiple bodily systems being thrown into dysfunction by prolonged stress. Many people with burnout report unexplained physical symptoms: diffuse pain throughout the body, inflammation in unexpected places (like chronic sinus issues), dizziness when standing up (POTS), and a general sense that their body simply isn't working correctly. If these experiences sound familiar, you're not imagining things, and you're not alone. Why Burnout Is So Misunderstood Modern medicine excels at addressing acute problems with clear causes and treatments, but struggles with complex multi-system conditions like burnout. Most doctors receive minimal training on chronic conditions, and virtually none on how different bodily systems interact in states of prolonged stress. When you visit a specialist, they examine only their area of expertise - a gastroenterologist looks at digestive issues, a neurologist at brain symptoms - but rarely does anyone look at the full picture. This fragmented approach leads to medical gaslighting - being told "your labs are normal, it must be stress" or "this sounds like depression" without investigating the underlying physiological causes. Some providers dismiss "adrenal fatigue" as pseudoscience, despite extensive research on HPA axis dysfunction (the medical term for what many call adrenal fatigue). Others will acknowledge only the most extreme manifestations like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, missing opportunities for earlier intervention. The Five Systems Behind Burnout Burnout involves five primary overlapping systems that become dysfunctional or dysregulated. Understanding these systems is key to addressing the root causes rather than just managing symptoms. 1. HPA Axis Dysfunction The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is your body's main stress response pathway. This system connects your brain to your adrenal glands and regulates energy, stress hormones, and your ability to adapt to challenges. When chronically activated, this system eventually loses its ability to respond appropriately. This dysfunction manifests as cortisol irregularities - either producing too little overall, or producing it at the wrong times. If you struggle to wake up in the morning, you might have insufficient morning cortisol. If you wake too early and can't fall back asleep, you might have inappropriate early cortisol spikes. Recovery from HPA axis dysfunction typically takes 6 months to 2 years, with severe cases taking 3-5 years. 2. Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Dysfunction Your autonomic nervous system controls unconscious bodily functions like heart rate, blood pressure, digestion, and temperature regulation. Burnout can cause dysautonomia - a state where your sympathetic ("fight-or-flight") system becomes dominant, while your parasympathetic ("rest-and-digest") system becomes underactive. Symptoms include heart palpitations, dizziness when standing up, temperature regulation problems, digestive motility issues (feeling like food sits in your stomach for hours), and heightened sensitivity to environmental stimuli. Getting "stuck" in sympathetic dominance keeps your body in a state of hypervigilance, preventing proper rest and recovery. 3. Gastrointestinal System Dysfunction Your digestive system is often called your "second brain" for good reason - it produces 90% of your serotonin and houses its own nervous system (the enteric nervous system). The gut plays a critical role in immune function and overall health. Burnout can affect your gut through several mechanisms: chronic stress can impair the gut lining (leading to "leaky gut"), infections like H. pylori can cause inflammation, and your microbiome (the trillions of bacteria in your digestive system) can become imbalanced. When your gut is compromised, the effects ripple throughout your entire body, causing nutrient deficiencies, systemic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and altered neurotransmitter production that affects mood and cognition. 4. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Mitochondria are the power plants of your cells, producing the energy currency (ATP) that fuels all cellular activities. During burnout, these vital organelles become damaged and less efficient. Their internal structures (cristae) can physically deform, and they shift to less efficient energy production methods. The result is profound fatigue at a cellular level - your body literally cannot produce enough energy to function optimally. Every tissue, organ, and system feels the effects of this energy deficit. The good news is that mitochondria can recover with proper support, as they contain their own DNA and can regenerate when given the right conditions. 5. Immune System Dysfunction Your immune system becomes dysregulated during burnout, often becoming simultaneously overactive in some ways and underactive in others. This paradoxical state can manifest as frequent infections (showing immune weakness) alongside inflammatory conditions and hypersensitivities (showing immune overactivity). Chronic inflammation becomes a persistent problem, creating a constant state of low-grade immune activation that further drains your energy resources and affects brain function, healing ability, and overall wellbeing. Many people with burnout develop new sensitivities to foods, chemicals, or environments that never bothered them before. The Vicious Cycle and Downward Spiral What makes burnout particularly challenging is how these five systems interact and reinforce each other's dysfunction. HPA axis problems disrupt sleep, which impairs mitochondrial recovery. Gut issues create inflammation that triggers immune responses and stresses the HPA axis further. Mitochondrial dysfunction means less energy for healing and proper system function. Minor burnout can resolve on its own with sufficient rest and stress reduction. However, once a certain threshold is crossed, these systems keep each other sick in a self-perpetuating cycle. Without targeted interventions addressing each affected system, recovery becomes extremely difficult or impossible. This explains why some people remain burned out for years or decades despite their best efforts to rest and reduce stress. Navigating Medical Support Unfortunately, most healthcare providers aren't equipped to address burnout as a multi-system condition. This means you must often become your own health advocate and case manager. Some strategies include: When seeking medical help, speak the language of the specialist you're consulting. Instead of saying "adrenal fatigue" (which many doctors dismiss), use terms like "HPA axis dysfunction" or "dysautonomia" that align with medical terminology. Request appropriate testing. Standard bloodwork often misses the markers of burnout. More specialized tests like comprehensive stool analyses, organic acid tests, or cortisol rhythm testing can reveal the underlying issues. Consider working with integrative or functional medicine practitioners who are more likely to understand complex, multi-system conditions. However, be cautious, as quality varies widely in these fields. Remember that your experience is real and valid, even when healthcare providers can't immediately identify the cause. Persistent advocacy may be necessary to get the support you need. Recovery Is Possible But Takes Time Recovering from burnout is a gradual process that cannot be rushed. In fact, trying to accelerate recovery through sheer willpower often backfires, causing setbacks and prolonging the journey. The first rule of burnout recovery is "don't make it worse" - which means avoiding overexertion, respecting your body's current limitations, and prioritizing rest and healing above productivity. Recovery requires addressing all affected systems simultaneously through a combination of lifestyle changes, targeted supplements, stress management, diet modifications, and sometimes medications. This process is highly individualized - what works for one person may not work for another due to genetic differences, varying dietary needs, different lifestyle factors, and unique personal circumstances. The journey to recovery often requires significant changes to how you live and work. It may mean rethinking career choices, relationship dynamics, living situations, and fundamental priorities. While challenging, this process can ultimately lead to a more sustainable and fulfilling life built on a deeper understanding of your body's needs. Conclusion Burnout is not a character flaw or a sign of weakness - it's a complex physiological condition involving multiple bodily systems. By understanding the five key systems involved and how they interact, you can begin to address the root causes rather than just managing symptoms. Recovery is possible, but it requires patience, persistence, and a willingness to make meaningful changes. The path forward involves supporting your body's natural healing processes while avoiding the patterns that led to burnout in the first place. With the right approach, you can not only recover from burnout but emerge with greater resilience and a more balanced relationship with stress.

David Shapiro (L/0)

14,173 просмотров • 1 год назад

New Mobile Electronic Warfare (EW) & Radar Systems of Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) BATTLE TESTED & WORLD STEALTH SUPERIORITY in all CLASSES ! By 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪 Thread 1 / 5 Russian MoD has been aggressively modernizing its electronic warfare & radar capabilities, particularly in response to lessons from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. These systems emphasize mobility, integration with air defense networks, & countermeasures against drones, precision-guided munitions, & enemy command-control (C2) structures. Many are designed for rapid deployment in tactical environments, often mounted on vehicles, aircraft, or even backpack-portable for infantry use. Below, I'll break down key new or upgraded systems with specifics on their features, operational roles & adaptations. Key Electronic Warfare Systems Krasukha Series (Krasukha-4 / Krasukha-2): These are multifunctional mobile jamming platforms mounted on truck chassis like the BAZ-6910, making them highly deployable across rough terrain. The Krasukha-4 can jam airborne radars, including those on AWACS aircraft, drones & satellites, at ranges up to 300 km. It uses digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) technology to create false targets & spoof enemy sensors, disrupting reconnaissance and fire-control systems. In recent operations, it's been used to create "electronic shields" over bases & troop concentrations, suppressing enemy ISR (intelligence, surveillance & reconnaissance) assets. Upgrades in 2024-2025 include better integration with AI for adaptive frequency hopping, allowing it to counter advanced jamming-resistant signals from Western systems. Skovorodka (Frying Pan) System: Introduced in late 2024, this is a compact, backpack-portable EW device developed by AO "AEC" for frontline infantry. Weighing under 10 kg, it operates on dual frequencies to jam enemy reconnaissance drones (e.g., DJI models) & artillery targeting systems within a 5-10 km radius. It disrupts the "reconnaissance-fire chain" by blocking data links & GPS signals, reducing drone effectiveness by up to 70% in tested scenarios. It's integrated into broader air defense networks like the S-400 & S-500, providing ground-level offensive EW to blind hostile radars while protecting Russian assets. Its low cost (~ $5,000 per unit) allows mass deployment, with production ramped up to equip motorized rifle battalions. Leer-3 (RB-341V): A mobile EW complex integrated with Orlan-10 UAVs for remote operation. Mounted on MT-LB armored vehicles, it jams GSM, satellite communications & GPS signals within a 6 km radius, often scattering jammers via drones for area denial. Recent enhancements include PSYOPS capabilities, such as sending fake SMS to enemy troops for disinformation. In 2025 deployments, it's been paired with anti-drone interceptors to create layered defenses against UAV swarms, with ranges extended to 10-15 km through improved antennas. Borisoglebsk-2 (RB-301B): This automated jamming system is chassis-mounted on MT-LBu vehicles for high mobility. It detects, analyzes & suppresses HF/VHF/UHF communications & radar signals up to 30-50 km away. Specifics include direction-finding accuracy within 1-2 degrees & the ability to handle up to 100 simultaneous targets. 2025 updates incorporate AI-driven algorithms for real-time spectrum analysis, making it more effective against frequency-agile Western radios. Rychag-AV: A versatile EW module installable on helicopters (e.g., Mi-8), ships, or ground vehicles. It jams sensors and radars at hundreds of kilometers using DRFM to mimic echoes and create phantom threats. Recent mobile variants on KamAZ trucks allow rapid repositioning, with power outputs up to 10 kW for sustained jamming. Zhitel (R-330Zh): Mobile on Ural trucks, it jams communications, GPS, and air targets up to 200 km. It's often used in tandem with radar systems to disrupt drone data links, with 2025 models featuring modular antennas for quick setup in 15-20 minutes. PART 1 >>>

New Mobile Electronic Warfare (EW) & Radar Systems of Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) BATTLE TESTED & WORLD STEALTH SUPERIORITY in all CLASSES ! By 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪 Thread 1 / 5 Russian MoD has been aggressively modernizing its electronic warfare & radar capabilities, particularly in response to lessons from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. These systems emphasize mobility, integration with air defense networks, & countermeasures against drones, precision-guided munitions, & enemy command-control (C2) structures. Many are designed for rapid deployment in tactical environments, often mounted on vehicles, aircraft, or even backpack-portable for infantry use. Below, I'll break down key new or upgraded systems with specifics on their features, operational roles & adaptations. Key Electronic Warfare Systems Krasukha Series (Krasukha-4 / Krasukha-2): These are multifunctional mobile jamming platforms mounted on truck chassis like the BAZ-6910, making them highly deployable across rough terrain. The Krasukha-4 can jam airborne radars, including those on AWACS aircraft, drones & satellites, at ranges up to 300 km. It uses digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) technology to create false targets & spoof enemy sensors, disrupting reconnaissance and fire-control systems. In recent operations, it's been used to create "electronic shields" over bases & troop concentrations, suppressing enemy ISR (intelligence, surveillance & reconnaissance) assets. Upgrades in 2024-2025 include better integration with AI for adaptive frequency hopping, allowing it to counter advanced jamming-resistant signals from Western systems. Skovorodka (Frying Pan) System: Introduced in late 2024, this is a compact, backpack-portable EW device developed by AO "AEC" for frontline infantry. Weighing under 10 kg, it operates on dual frequencies to jam enemy reconnaissance drones (e.g., DJI models) & artillery targeting systems within a 5-10 km radius. It disrupts the "reconnaissance-fire chain" by blocking data links & GPS signals, reducing drone effectiveness by up to 70% in tested scenarios. It's integrated into broader air defense networks like the S-400 & S-500, providing ground-level offensive EW to blind hostile radars while protecting Russian assets. Its low cost (~ $5,000 per unit) allows mass deployment, with production ramped up to equip motorized rifle battalions. Leer-3 (RB-341V): A mobile EW complex integrated with Orlan-10 UAVs for remote operation. Mounted on MT-LB armored vehicles, it jams GSM, satellite communications & GPS signals within a 6 km radius, often scattering jammers via drones for area denial. Recent enhancements include PSYOPS capabilities, such as sending fake SMS to enemy troops for disinformation. In 2025 deployments, it's been paired with anti-drone interceptors to create layered defenses against UAV swarms, with ranges extended to 10-15 km through improved antennas. Borisoglebsk-2 (RB-301B): This automated jamming system is chassis-mounted on MT-LBu vehicles for high mobility. It detects, analyzes & suppresses HF/VHF/UHF communications & radar signals up to 30-50 km away. Specifics include direction-finding accuracy within 1-2 degrees & the ability to handle up to 100 simultaneous targets. 2025 updates incorporate AI-driven algorithms for real-time spectrum analysis, making it more effective against frequency-agile Western radios. Rychag-AV: A versatile EW module installable on helicopters (e.g., Mi-8), ships, or ground vehicles. It jams sensors and radars at hundreds of kilometers using DRFM to mimic echoes and create phantom threats. Recent mobile variants on KamAZ trucks allow rapid repositioning, with power outputs up to 10 kW for sustained jamming. Zhitel (R-330Zh): Mobile on Ural trucks, it jams communications, GPS, and air targets up to 200 km. It's often used in tandem with radar systems to disrupt drone data links, with 2025 models featuring modular antennas for quick setup in 15-20 minutes. PART 1 >>>

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

13,156 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump has not yet decided whether the U.S will participate in attacks on Iran's nuclear and military programs. The option was discussed during a national security team meeting, though he reportedly hopes the threat alone will force Iran to accept U.S demands in nuclear negotiations. 2.⁠ ⁠Iran’s Supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, is due to address the nation as it enters the 6th day of its war with Israel. His last public address was during Friday prayers last week shortly after Israel attacked. 3.⁠ The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Israeli airstrikes hit 2 key sites: the Tehran Research Center and TESA Karaj workshop. One building producing advanced centrifuge rotors was hit in Tehran; 2 buildings making other components were destroyed in Karaj. 4.⁠ Iran launched multiple missile volleys overnight, targeting central and northern Israel. 94 people were treated for injuries, and fires broke out from impacts and interceptor debris, according to Israel’s Health Ministry. 5.⁠ The IDF confirmed that Iran downed one of their Hermes 900 drones. It marks the first time Iran has successfully downed one of the high-value drones - each worth up to $20 million. 6.⁠ Netanyahu’s office revealed that Iran has launched over 400 missiles and hundreds of drones since the war began last Friday. Around 40 impacts have hit across Israel, killing 24 people, wounding 800+, and forcing over 3,800 to evacuate. 7.⁠ Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran is confident Arab neighbors won’t allow U.S forces on their soil to strike Iran. 8.⁠ Israel’s supply of "Arrow" missile interceptors is reportedly dwindling. The advanced, high-altitude defense systems are critical to countering long-range ballistic missile threats, like those launched from Iran. 9.⁠ A key radar system in Hamedan province, in western Iran, near the borders with Iraq and Turkey, has been replaced after being taken out. The Soubashi radar provided vital air defense coverage for western, northwestern, and southwestern Iran. 10.⁠ El Al resumed operations into Israel with a flight from Larnaca, Cyprus, landing at Ben Gurion Airport for the first time since the war with Iran erupted last Friday. The mission is part of Operation Safe Return, launched by Israel’s Transport Ministry to bring back the estimated 100,000 citizens currently stranded overseas.

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump has not yet decided whether the U.S will participate in attacks on Iran's nuclear and military programs. The option was discussed during a national security team meeting, though he reportedly hopes the threat alone will force Iran to accept U.S demands in nuclear negotiations. 2.⁠ ⁠Iran’s Supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, is due to address the nation as it enters the 6th day of its war with Israel. His last public address was during Friday prayers last week shortly after Israel attacked. 3.⁠ The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Israeli airstrikes hit 2 key sites: the Tehran Research Center and TESA Karaj workshop. One building producing advanced centrifuge rotors was hit in Tehran; 2 buildings making other components were destroyed in Karaj. 4.⁠ Iran launched multiple missile volleys overnight, targeting central and northern Israel. 94 people were treated for injuries, and fires broke out from impacts and interceptor debris, according to Israel’s Health Ministry. 5.⁠ The IDF confirmed that Iran downed one of their Hermes 900 drones. It marks the first time Iran has successfully downed one of the high-value drones - each worth up to $20 million. 6.⁠ Netanyahu’s office revealed that Iran has launched over 400 missiles and hundreds of drones since the war began last Friday. Around 40 impacts have hit across Israel, killing 24 people, wounding 800+, and forcing over 3,800 to evacuate. 7.⁠ Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran is confident Arab neighbors won’t allow U.S forces on their soil to strike Iran. 8.⁠ Israel’s supply of "Arrow" missile interceptors is reportedly dwindling. The advanced, high-altitude defense systems are critical to countering long-range ballistic missile threats, like those launched from Iran. 9.⁠ A key radar system in Hamedan province, in western Iran, near the borders with Iraq and Turkey, has been replaced after being taken out. The Soubashi radar provided vital air defense coverage for western, northwestern, and southwestern Iran. 10.⁠ El Al resumed operations into Israel with a flight from Larnaca, Cyprus, landing at Ben Gurion Airport for the first time since the war with Iran erupted last Friday. The mission is part of Operation Safe Return, launched by Israel’s Transport Ministry to bring back the estimated 100,000 citizens currently stranded overseas.

Mario Nawfal

188,541 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

aussie17

126,273 просмотров • 1 год назад