Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

. Chuck Schumer has been in the Senate for so long … he’s an ancient relic whose ego borders the line of narcissism. It makes you wonder if he was that kid in school that was given too many head-swirlies and now has the power to take it out...

53,835 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Francois Leclerc's profile picture
Francois Leclerc1 year ago

@SenSchumer No one should be allowed to spend more then a total of 8 years in any political role, if the President can only serve 2 terms of 4 years, why doesn't it apply to all politicians?

NWRain-Judi's profile picture
NWRain-Judi1 year ago

@SenSchumer He's showing everyone what the Dem party sole purpose is today - taking down MAGA. The couldn't care less about what WTP want and voted for. The entire party is 100% anti-American. Let them all implode!

Rebelcat's profile picture
Rebelcat1 year ago

@SenSchumer Term limits would help clear out a lot of the corruption in the District of Criminals.

Rarely Tolerable.'s profile picture
Rarely Tolerable.1 year ago

Senator Wyden: " We are in an arms race on clean energy with them. Are you going to be on the side of people who want to unravel this?" Treasury secretary nominee Scott Bessent: " China will build a hundred new coal plants this year. Senator Wyden. There is not a clean energy race. There is an energy race. China will build 10 nuclear plants this year."

Dr Trumpenstein's profile picture
Dr Trumpenstein1 year ago

@SenSchumer Term Limits - 12 years total in Congress - Senate + House combined - 12 years and gone.

RageFire11's profile picture
RageFire111 year ago

@SenSchumer It's time to get old Chucky a new suit.

Terry Keiner's profile picture
Terry Keiner1 year ago

@SenSchumer And he probably had his lunch money taken by the girls.

Heather G's profile picture
Heather G1 year ago

This is simply more of that FAKE news! “We the People have been waiting for this a very long time!” Most of us love our Country more than we ever did… there are a mere handful of dems that can‘t just act like grown adults and accept change and listen to the people …. They’re acting like monkeys 🐵!!

Dr's In, aka Dashadeaux's profile picture
Dr's In, aka Dashadeaux1 year ago

@SenSchumer That's exactly who he is! Stuff him a locker!

michael A koropsak's profile picture
michael A koropsak1 year ago

@gaye_gallops @SenSchumer You just defined every democrat mail. 👍🏻

jay smith's profile picture
jay smith1 year ago

@matjendav4 @SenSchumer Borderline?? He is the definition of malignant narcissist.

Related Videos

Being Dominant means being the One in Control. Some people love it and some hate it, but either way, there is always someone in control and the areas where you are not the one in control, are where you have given that control to someone else! Being the one in control means being the one people TRUST to lead, to be in charge. And for us to hold that responsibility, we gotta be not only comfortable with that role, but to love it! To want it. Control holds negative connotations, yet if it is exerted by someone with positive intentions, it is very healthy. It means you trust yourself and don't need to rely on others to direct you. NOT being in control means chaos. It means helplessness. It means inability to make decisions. Or to take initiatives. It means you are the one that follows. And if that is what you actually desire you have to be conscious of that choice. Otherwise you fall into that role and then wonder why nothing goes as you want. And if you choose to follow, choose your leader wisely. There always is someone in control, someone in charge, someone that leads. There is always a power dynamic. Truth is, we feel safe with those in control. Especially when they show us that them being in that role is positive for us. But so many people trust others more than they trust themselves! Which means being constantly influenced by everyone else's option and advice... which makes then the ones in control of your life! Decide WHO you want to take control when you want or need it, but also choose when YOU should be The One in charge. Developing that self-trust requires radical self responsibility. Which is what people struggle with. Nobody wants to be responsible for anything. And then we blame everyone for why our lives are not what we want them to be. And if you DO want to dominate, start by controling your own Self, your own thoughts, your own life. You can't expect others to trust YOU if YOU don't. Think about it... those that are in control are the people that have the most influence in the world. So if conscious people who desire to create a positive change take more control/responsibility, it would literally change society as we know it.

Ms. Malissia

18,397 views • 2 years ago

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.

Phil Williams

74,713 views • 1 month ago

🔥 from Peter Meijer on the government shutdown: “I don't think this is good for the Democrats. I mean, you have Donald Trump negotiating Mideast peace and flying to Egypt to oversee an agreement between Hamas and Israel. And meanwhile, Chuck Schumer is parading around the Senate, you know, trying to stage a photo op. I mean, the split screen between actual governance of the Trump administration and just a Senate Democrats trying to figure out their message, right? Senator Van Hollen...called the — the expiring ObamaCare subsidies a ticking time bomb the Republicans planted. They were introduced in ARPA, the American Rescue Plan in 2021. I know. I was in Congress. We all voted against it on the Republican side. That was a Democrat budget reconciliation bill. It got to the Senate and it needed 50 Senate votes. They talked about making it permanent, could not get unified Democratic support to make it permanent. It came up again in the Inflation Reduction Act. They kicked the can down the road again, solely Democrats voting in support of this could not get Democrats to agree to make these permanent. And now, somehow, years later, as the Republicans that are the sticking point. You were right in March, sir! Chuck Schumer should just continue to reopen the government. And right now, Donald Trump is having to take tariff revenue to support food stamp and WIC programs. He's reallocating budgets within DoD so that troops are getting paid. He's actually doing work, and Democrats are still figuring out their message.”

Curtis Houck

542,458 views • 10 months ago