Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Cinema needs #Akshaykumar Theatres doesn't bleed when #Zero, #Raees are disasters of Gargantuan proportion. But an #Akshaykumar film becoming below average hurts. #Akshay get more film offers than any other star on this planet. Blockbusters loading.

33,429 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Sachin_07 profil fotoğrafı
Sachin_071 yıl önce

Raees collection >>> disaster sarfira,selfiee ,omg 2 , sky force collection

Skydance profil fotoğrafı
Skydance1 yıl önce

Our lives are the sum of our choices. Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning. See you at the movies May 23, 2025.

Pratham profil fotoğrafı
Pratham1 yıl önce

BMCM Budget - 350 cr Collection - 85-90 cr Worldwide Mission Raniganj Budget - 200 cr Collection - 70 cr WW Selfiee Budget - 250 cr Collection - 50 cr WW Even Skyforce budget - 250 cr Collection - 170 cr WW ( with Free tickets, offers ,etc) Cry more 🤣🤣

S.S ALI profil fotoğrafı
S.S ALI1 yıl önce

Srk disasters films more collected money than Akshay kumar okey..

Nitesh Naveen profil fotoğrafı
Nitesh Naveen1 yıl önce

More losses were made from 1 single film of #SRK. Hence, the disaster of Gargantuan proportion was used. Financial literacy is a must for all #SRK fans.

Mun Patel profil fotoğrafı
Mun Patel1 yıl önce

If #Raees is a disaster, then #Selfie is a blockbuster.

Naan Thaan Da King-u profil fotoğrafı
Naan Thaan Da King-u1 yıl önce

More movies = More disasters

MAYANK 🪖 profil fotoğrafı
MAYANK 🪖1 yıl önce

5 disasters in a row , wait

CineMaza profil fotoğrafı
CineMaza1 yıl önce

bhai jitne kama kar srk salman flop dete hai utne me akshay ki film blockbuster ho jaati hai 🤣

ı•m•săm profil fotoğrafı
ı•m•săm1 yıl önce

Canadian kumar

Benzer Videolar

In 1977, Rainer Werner Fassbinder was a member of the jury at the Berlin Film Festival. He threatened to walk out with British critic Derek Malcolm unless their support for Bresson’s 'The Devil, Probably' (1977) for the top prize was made public. The movie ended up sharing the second prize, the Silver Bear, with two other films. Fassbinder's thoughts on the film: "Fassbinder: Robert Bresson's 'The Devil, Probably' (1977), which is the most shattering film I've seen in this Berlin Festival. I think it's a major film; but then people say - but what if you show a film like this to the man in the street and he doesn't understand it? First of all, I think that's wrong. But even if it's true, doesn't it mean that in the future - and this world will probably last for another few thousand years - this film will be more important than all the rubbish which is now considered important but which never really goes deep enough? The questions Bresson asks will never be unimportant. Interviewer: What about the problems raised in Bresson's film - are they rejecting all existing political forms? Fassbinder: Yes, rejecting every commitment. Because commitment for the film's young characters - whom he seems to understand so well - is mainly an escape into an 'occupation' which keeps that commitment alive. An escape from the awareness that everything goes on regardless of you and your commitment." ("Robert Bresson", Edited by James Quandt, 1998) P.S: On this day, 49 years ago, 'The Devil, Probably' (1977) was released in France.

DepressedBergman

127,202 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Ingmar Bergman talks about the drawbacks of using amateur/non-professional actors in movies: "Bergman: As long as something unambiguous is required of someone in a film, an amateur will do. But the moment something complex has to be expressed, an amateur is no use. Actors are trained to express complexities. Interviewer: Are you saying, categorically, that an amateur is incapable of expressing anything complex. Bergman: Yes, I am. You may be able to do it with the help of an amateur; but you can never get an amateur, on his own, to express something complex. This can be seen very clearly in the film I like more than any other, and which I suppose I must have seen a hundred times: De Sica’s 'Umberto D' (1952). There he uses the old professor— who was an amateur— admittedly with a dubbed voice, the voice of a professional actor. One sees clearly how situations arose when De Sica wanted him to express certain things— and it's more than he can manage. That's why the film becomes flat and slack in a few places, particularly at the end. I don’t think one could find a single instance of someone having got an amateur to express something complex. It’s simply beyond them. The moment I find I’m out of rapport with someone who’s got to do something in front of the camera, I’m utterly lost. The whole situation becomes idiotic. If I get an actor— and it has happened — who becomes petrified in front of the camera, falls into a cramp, can't remember what he's got to do, or panics for some other reason, the whole film becomes extraordinarily hard to clear up." ('Bergman on Bergman', Stig Björkman, Torsten Manns, Jonas Sima, translated by Paul Britten Austin, 1973) Clip from: Umberto D. (1952) Director: Vittorio De Sica

DepressedBergman

28,017 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce