Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Claude Code is unusable. So I built my own. Introducing BridgeCode. Launching next Wednesday. Everything you love about Claude Code. No rate limits. No 529 errors. No 500 errors. No nerfing. Connect to any provider. Claude Opus 4.6. GPT 5.4. Gemini 3.1 Pro. GLM 5.1. All of them. Switch... show more
47,273 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 48

Test it on terminal bench, that's all that matters for now for a harness.

Benchmarks are coming

Can't wait to see the result!

@bridgemindai This is where things click. You handle the multi-model runtime. We handle a persistent codebase context that travels with the developer. RepoWise + BridgeCode means your context stays accurate no matter which model you switch to. Let's talk integration.

DM us

BridgeCode for the win

Let's gooo

Benchmark it, post the results.

Launch day benchmarks incoming

I'm not sure how you avoid rate limits when you're still hitting the same provider APIs that cause them in the first place. Unless you're running local models, the bottleneck just moves downstream.

What's the difference with OpenCode? and how can you change limits because it's API based not locked in claude code directly

great

Appreciate it

does It fix cache issue with Claude ? and will be benchmarks with BridgeCode, Claude, Codex, Opencode ?

Benchmarks on launch day

chi~

Thanks for the love

Looks cool

Wait till you try it

You didn’t build Claude

@TechIno219886 We built something better

Can be. I am building a a platform too with a router and all. But we don’t provide the AI, we provide the layer 1 on top of it

Very interested to try this

@bridgemindai sounds dope. always hated those error codes popping up mid-work. curious to see how it holds up with different providers. keep us posted!

"Claude Code rate limited me into building a competitor." best origin story in developer tools i've seen on the tl today. anger is an underrated product specification

Exciting...

@AlpMirasow19284 Just getting started

So another OpenCode?

@orelohayo Different level entirely

are u sure u didnt just take the code from the leak?

Oggi anche con piani meno costosi, si può lavorare h24 notte inclusa con risultati pari. Anche perchè la scrittura anche Minimax la fa uguale. Cambia il ragionamento. Ma con buoni prompt + agenti specializzati non deve ragionare, solo eseguire, e le differenze diventano poche.

Really excited for this honestly

@Maxsaturnis Wait till you see it

Huh? How? Calling different LLMs?

I learned the hard way that eval sets break when agents start hallucinating tool calls. Will you share how you're testing reliability across those different models before launch?

Grok support?

One question. It requires api access, right? People with codex or claude code with not be able to use their account access, right?

dude scary

🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

Difference to open code?

No rate-limiting (Except by the provider you bring)

so what ai model you use to create this?

Worth seeing goodluck.

The VS Code extension you didn't know you needed.🚀 ARK95 uses AI to map your repo and generate live documentation with one click. ✅ AI-Powered ✅ 3 Free diagrams TRY IT NOW 🔥 :

This is sick. Finally an alternative that actually works. BridgeCode sounds legit, can't wait to try it.

Claude Code's harness is too good to let go. Also it's definitely not the harness giving you 529 and rate limitations. Those come from the model provisioning service. The harness is just the business side. The core side is the one responsible for the problems. Congratulations on the release though.

Switching endpoints is the easy part, but orchestrating 10 agents in a 'Swarm mode' without them stepping on each other's toes is the real engineering challenge. Without strict context isolation and state-sync protocols (like MCP), multi-agent repo editing usually devolves into a merge-conflict nightmare. If BridgeCode solves the state-synchronization problem seamlessly, that's a massive breakthrough. Looking forward to testing it!

Doesn't it use Claude's API?

