Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
CLAUDE + OBSIDIAN + LOOP ENGINEERING = AN AGENT THAT LIVES INSIDE YOUR NOTES Karpathy's second brain runs on something close to this two years of growth he typed almost none of it himself • the loop, four steps on repeat > read - Claude Opus 5 opens the... show more
27,174 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 17

On a typical vault pass, what does that 2–4x actually land at in tokens or $ per kept edit?

I'm definitely saving this man, but I’m kinda interested in seeing how they decide when one loop should stop and another should start, especially once the vault gets really large

very interesting concept using claude with obsidian for knowledge management.

Saving this Obsidian loop

This mirrors Luhmann's Zettelkasten, but with autonomous agents. Fascinating evolution of systems thinking.

@polydao that's wild! I hit this exact wall building my own thing. The note-taking process changed everything for me.

when the loop writes back to the vault, what stops old notes from slowly drifting out of sync with what claude would output today? two years feels like a long time for that to compound

how do you review the branch, diff in git or inside obsidian?

Such a detailed yet concise guide my friend, you made my day.

Is this a second brain or a tomb of unearned insights? When the agent does the synthesis, we often trade cognitive clarity for the mere illusion of progress.

The interesting failure mode shows up around year three. A vault that big stops fitting in context, so the read becomes a retrieval step, and whatever ranks your notes becomes the actual second brain. Curious: plain search over the vault, embeddings, or the agent walking links?

Append only is the right call, and the drift question is the one that decides whether it holds. A critic reading the diff catches contradictions at write time, not the note that was true in March and quietly stopped being true in August. Reading the vault back on a schedule, not just writing to it, is what keeps the old half honest.

booked

that four-step loop sounds super efficient. love the idea of not overwriting notes too

critic on the diff before keep is the loop notes should grow, not get rewritten

The durable pattern is simple: let agents propose append-only changes, have a separate check verify the diff, and keep only measured improvements. That turns notes into a compounding system instead of a fragile prompt dump.

this is kinda cool for personal knowledge management
