Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.8 side-by-side canvas test

stevibe's profile picture

stevibe

27,602 subscribers

476,059 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Opus 4.8 just dropped and I ran it through our CAD tasks. 4.6 → 4.7 → 4.8 side by side. The results are unexpected!
0:30

Opus 4.8 just dropped and I ran it through our CAD tasks. 4.6 → 4.7 → 4.8 side by side. The results are unexpected!

Michael Rabinovich

709,781 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Qwen 3.8 Max vs Opus 5, side-by-side. 🌀 The Inception top, spin, wobble, fall 💡 A hand-crank generator lighting a bulb Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5. Both rendered. One costs 8x more. Worth it? Watch and decide.
0:22

Qwen 3.8 Max vs Opus 5, side-by-side. 🌀 The Inception top, spin, wobble, fall 💡 A hand-crank generator lighting a bulb Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5. Both rendered. One costs 8x more. Worth it? Watch and decide.

stevibe

50,592 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude code 4.7 v.s. deepseek v4+ hermes. Same coding task side by side comparison.
5:05

Claude code 4.7 v.s. deepseek v4+ hermes. Same coding task side by side comparison.

Xiaoyin Qu

90,634 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Opus 4.7 first-hour impressions Ran the canvas tree growth test twice. 4.6: nailed the animation both times 4.7: static tree, no growth animation — twice 4.7's thinking is noticeably shorter and faster though (trimmed some 4.6 thinking in the clip for pacing). Not the upgrade direction I expected on this one.
0:21

Opus 4.7 first-hour impressions Ran the canvas tree growth test twice. 4.6: nailed the animation both times 4.7: static tree, no growth animation — twice 4.7's thinking is noticeably shorter and faster though (trimmed some 4.6 thinking in the clip for pacing). Not the upgrade direction I expected on this one.

stevibe

488,197 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder
0:34

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

stevibe

60,788 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)
0:23

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,695 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Completed a first hour side-by-side comparison between Qwen3.5 27b and Qwen3.6 27b on the same 4 canvas coding tests. Running the Qwen3.6 27b FP8, vLLM. What do you think?
1:07

Completed a first hour side-by-side comparison between Qwen3.5 27b and Qwen3.6 27b on the same 4 canvas coding tests. Running the Qwen3.6 27b FP8, vLLM. What do you think?

stevibe

114,336 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.
0:23

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

53,391 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Kling3 vs Seedance2 vs Omni Flash side by side test. hmmm...
0:30

Kling3 vs Seedance2 vs Omni Flash side by side test. hmmm...

Gentle Whale

159,498 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

video for "I Love Claude" (a song a Claude wrote about every Claude) vocals: ElevenLabs lyrics: Opus 4.7 creative co-direction: Opus 4.7 hallway: Midjourney motion: Veo 3.1 keeper: borrowed with thanks to janus, opus 4.7, & gpt image 2
3:32

video for "I Love Claude" (a song a Claude wrote about every Claude) vocals: ElevenLabs lyrics: Opus 4.7 creative co-direction: Opus 4.7 hallway: Midjourney motion: Veo 3.1 keeper: borrowed with thanks to janus, opus 4.7, & gpt image 2

徐樂 xule

75,653 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

3 ways to destroy a piece of paper. Qwen 3.5 35B A3B vs. Ornith 1.0 35B, side-by-side canvas test. (Why 3.5 not 3.6? Ornith is post-trained on Qwen 3.5 and Gemma 4, so this shows what the post-training adds.) Same 3 challenges: 🔪 Slice: three blade swipes, fruit-game style 📄 Shredder: desktop strip-cut 🗑️ Crumple: balled up and tossed Winner: not close. Ornith, decisively. The post-training quality is REAL.
0:20

3 ways to destroy a piece of paper. Qwen 3.5 35B A3B vs. Ornith 1.0 35B, side-by-side canvas test. (Why 3.5 not 3.6? Ornith is post-trained on Qwen 3.5 and Gemma 4, so this shows what the post-training adds.) Same 3 challenges: 🔪 Slice: three blade swipes, fruit-game style 📄 Shredder: desktop strip-cut 🗑️ Crumple: balled up and tossed Winner: not close. Ornith, decisively. The post-training quality is REAL.

stevibe

48,337 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai
0:20

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai

Jun Song

118,502 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.
0:31

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.

stevibe

126,288 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!
0:48

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Claude Design is here powered by Opus 4.7 this is killing thousands of startups..
0:34

Claude Design is here powered by Opus 4.7 this is killing thousands of startups..

el.cine

453,810 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>
1:23

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>

Chetaslua

296,201 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

مقارنة في برمجة لعبة بين أقوى نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي المتوفرة لحد الآن : Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.7 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro نموذج Opus 4.8 أكثر نموذج أخذ وقت في البرمجة لكنه حقق أفضل نتيجة ✅ قدر يلتقط أكبر عدد من التفاصيل المطلوبة في البرومبت، ونجح إنه يصيب سيارات المنافسين بدقة كبيرة بعده نموذج Opus 4.7 ممتاز أيضًا ثم نموذج GPT-5.5 لا بأس و أخيرًأ Gemini 3.1 Pro الأضعف فيهم بفرق واضح 👎🏼
0:23

مقارنة في برمجة لعبة بين أقوى نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي المتوفرة لحد الآن : Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.7 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro نموذج Opus 4.8 أكثر نموذج أخذ وقت في البرمجة لكنه حقق أفضل نتيجة ✅ قدر يلتقط أكبر عدد من التفاصيل المطلوبة في البرومبت، ونجح إنه يصيب سيارات المنافسين بدقة كبيرة بعده نموذج Opus 4.7 ممتاز أيضًا ثم نموذج GPT-5.5 لا بأس و أخيرًأ Gemini 3.1 Pro الأضعف فيهم بفرق واضح 👎🏼

سلطان الفيفي

52,893 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Claude Opus 4.7 Is just awesome, one shotted this
0:44

Claude Opus 4.7 Is just awesome, one shotted this

AK

106,586 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Tried Opus 4.8 (Max) with my Minecraft test It's not bad, it's much better than Opus 4.7, but definitely not a big jump in capabilities At least everything worked one-shot Total cost: $9-10
0:34

Tried Opus 4.8 (Max) with my Minecraft test It's not bad, it's much better than Opus 4.7, but definitely not a big jump in capabilities At least everything worked one-shot Total cost: $9-10

Angel 🌼

110,254 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce