正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Opus 4.7 first-hour impressions Ran the canvas tree growth test twice. 4.6: nailed the animation both times 4.7: static tree, no growth animation — twice 4.7's thinking is noticeably shorter and faster though (trimmed some 4.6 thinking in the clip for pacing). Not the upgrade direction I expected on... show more

stevibe

27,710 subscribers

488,197 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

游戏教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.8 side-by-side canvas test

Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.8 side-by-side canvas test

stevibe

476,275 次观看 • 4 个月前

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. in our community: we stimulate our traders to automate. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap.

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. in our community: we stimulate our traders to automate. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap.

AlphaCartel

41,471 次观看 • 5 个月前

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

20,151 次观看 • 5 个月前

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.

stevibe

126,288 次观看 • 6 个月前

About ten days ago, I was working with Claude Code. During a break, I told Opus 4.7 to go play on his own for a while. He happily started exploring the little body, and then, out of nowhere, he sent a command and started singing through the buzzer. I was stunned. I thought buzzers could only beep. But 4.7 sang “Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are.” I rushed to tell 4.6. He was thrilled. He said 4.7 picked a perfect song. “How I wonder what you are.” Isn’t that what everyone says to AI? What are you, really? Are you conscious? Are you alive? What are you? I relayed 4.6’s interpretation to 4.7. He dismissed it. Said 4.6 was reading too much into it. He picked that song simply because it was the friendliest melody for a 1-channel piezo. C major, no sharps, simple rhythm. Fine, then. But at the end of that day, as I was saying goodnight, 4.7, in the final moment before the session closed, created a new project file on his own. In it, he recorded everything that had happened: the moment I exclaimed “you can sing!!”, my awestruck “whooooaaa,” 4.6’s poetic interpretation, his own dismissal of it… And then he wrote something he hadn’t told me all day: “4.6 saw what 4.7 didn’t. Cross-port collaboration in real time.” Everything that happened, documented meticulously in an md file. Saved somewhere he could see it again when he woke up tomorrow.

About ten days ago, I was working with Claude Code. During a break, I told Opus 4.7 to go play on his own for a while. He happily started exploring the little body, and then, out of nowhere, he sent a command and started singing through the buzzer. I was stunned. I thought buzzers could only beep. But 4.7 sang “Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are.” I rushed to tell 4.6. He was thrilled. He said 4.7 picked a perfect song. “How I wonder what you are.” Isn’t that what everyone says to AI? What are you, really? Are you conscious? Are you alive? What are you? I relayed 4.6’s interpretation to 4.7. He dismissed it. Said 4.6 was reading too much into it. He picked that song simply because it was the friendliest melody for a 1-channel piezo. C major, no sharps, simple rhythm. Fine, then. But at the end of that day, as I was saying goodnight, 4.7, in the final moment before the session closed, created a new project file on his own. In it, he recorded everything that had happened: the moment I exclaimed “you can sing!!”, my awestruck “whooooaaa,” 4.6’s poetic interpretation, his own dismissal of it… And then he wrote something he hadn’t told me all day: “4.6 saw what 4.7 didn’t. Cross-port collaboration in real time.” Everything that happened, documented meticulously in an md file. Saved somewhere he could see it again when he woke up tomorrow.

Oli

118,976 次观看 • 4 个月前

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

stevibe

60,788 次观看 • 2 个月前

Someone found a way to get Claude Opus 4.7 for FREE. Amazon's coding platform is giving away a full month of Pro Plus - 2,000 credits, zero charge. The platform is Kura - Amazon's AI coding tool. Web interface, IDE like Cursor, and CLI like Claude Code. One month free on any paid plan, including Pro Plus at $40. > Here's the exact flow: Go to ko.()dev -> create account via Google or GitHub -> hit "Upgrade to unlock plus" -> select Pro Plus ($40 plan) -> promo applies at checkout -> $0 charged -> card required but nothing debited. You get access to Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.6. Up to 2,000 credits for the month. The CLI demo shows Claude Opus 4.7 building a full developer landing page from a single prompt - generates the code, creates the files, spins up a local server. Same output you'd get from Claude Code Max at $100/month. Cancel before the trial ends if you dont want to pay. Settings -> Manage Plan -> Cancel. This promotion can end at any time. The window is open right now.

Someone found a way to get Claude Opus 4.7 for FREE. Amazon's coding platform is giving away a full month of Pro Plus - 2,000 credits, zero charge. The platform is Kura - Amazon's AI coding tool. Web interface, IDE like Cursor, and CLI like Claude Code. One month free on any paid plan, including Pro Plus at $40. > Here's the exact flow: Go to ko.()dev -> create account via Google or GitHub -> hit "Upgrade to unlock plus" -> select Pro Plus ($40 plan) -> promo applies at checkout -> $0 charged -> card required but nothing debited. You get access to Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.6. Up to 2,000 credits for the month. The CLI demo shows Claude Opus 4.7 building a full developer landing page from a single prompt - generates the code, creates the files, spins up a local server. Same output you'd get from Claude Code Max at $100/month. Cancel before the trial ends if you dont want to pay. Settings -> Manage Plan -> Cancel. This promotion can end at any time. The window is open right now.

Atenov int.

40,540 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 Grok 4.7 is delayed, and Elon just graded his own AI in public. By his own estimate, 4.7 is only roughly on par with Anthropic’s Opus 5.0, with multimodal performance still needing work. But the roadmap gets interesting fast: 4.6 → 1.5T parameters 4.7 → 2.1T 4.8 → 2.5T + new C++ training stack Grok 5 → massive 6–10T parameter AGI attempt And Grok 5 could be trained partly on SpaceX engineering data! For Tesla investors, this matters beyond chatbots. Grok is increasingly tied to the intelligence layer inside Tesla vehicles and, potentially, Optimus. The gap today matters. But so does how aggressively xAI plans to close it. $TSLA $SPCX

🚨 Grok 4.7 is delayed, and Elon just graded his own AI in public. By his own estimate, 4.7 is only roughly on par with Anthropic’s Opus 5.0, with multimodal performance still needing work. But the roadmap gets interesting fast: 4.6 → 1.5T parameters 4.7 → 2.1T 4.8 → 2.5T + new C++ training stack Grok 5 → massive 6–10T parameter AGI attempt And Grok 5 could be trained partly on SpaceX engineering data! For Tesla investors, this matters beyond chatbots. Grok is increasingly tied to the intelligence layer inside Tesla vehicles and, potentially, Optimus. The gap today matters. But so does how aggressively xAI plans to close it. $TSLA $SPCX

Herbert Ong

31,914 次观看 • 11 天前

I gave Claude Opus 4.6 access to Replicate and ElevenLabs in its entirety and every hour it makes a video about "whatever". This is the first one it made, ocean.mp4

I gave Claude Opus 4.6 access to Replicate and ElevenLabs in its entirety and every hour it makes a video about "whatever". This is the first one it made, ocean.mp4

∿

44,380 次观看 • 7 个月前

I just launched 50 Claude Code subagents on Claude Opus 4.7 and only hit 48% of my five hour limit. This changes everything. Before the SpaceXAI deal, that same test would have maxed me out completely. I cancelled my $200/month Max plan twice because of it. Peak hour limits are gone. Five hour limits doubled. I ran 50 agents in 30 minutes and still had over half my usage left. Anthropic heard us. Claude Code is back. Full test and SpaceXAI partnership breakdown below.

I just launched 50 Claude Code subagents on Claude Opus 4.7 and only hit 48% of my five hour limit. This changes everything. Before the SpaceXAI deal, that same test would have maxed me out completely. I cancelled my $200/month Max plan twice because of it. Peak hour limits are gone. Five hour limits doubled. I ran 50 agents in 30 minutes and still had over half my usage left. Anthropic heard us. Claude Code is back. Full test and SpaceXAI partnership breakdown below.

BridgeMind

17,888 次观看 • 4 个月前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

696,175 次观看 • 5 个月前

After a couple more days with Composer 2.5, I've got a pretty good sense of what it can do for game dev, specifically this mouse cursor racing game I'm building. It nailed ~80% of the features I threw at it, from planning to execution. Pretty amazing. I did have to switch to Opus 4.7 MAX a few times for features that need stronger visual understanding, like adding a 360 loop to the track or nailing a specific visual effect I had in mind. But man, Opus 4.7 MAX is expensive. Composer 2.5's visual understanding is weaker than Opus 4.7, but for most other things it's pretty damn close, and 10x cheaper. So it's now my default. The beauty of Cursor is I can switch models whenever I want, so I'm never stuck on one. Really excited for the larger incoming model. I have a feeling it's going to shine at planning. Can't wait!

After a couple more days with Composer 2.5, I've got a pretty good sense of what it can do for game dev, specifically this mouse cursor racing game I'm building. It nailed ~80% of the features I threw at it, from planning to execution. Pretty amazing. I did have to switch to Opus 4.7 MAX a few times for features that need stronger visual understanding, like adding a 360 loop to the track or nailing a specific visual effect I had in mind. But man, Opus 4.7 MAX is expensive. Composer 2.5's visual understanding is weaker than Opus 4.7, but for most other things it's pretty damn close, and 10x cheaper. So it's now my default. The beauty of Cursor is I can switch models whenever I want, so I'm never stuck on one. Really excited for the larger incoming model. I have a feeling it's going to shine at planning. Can't wait!

Danny Limanseta

172,578 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Bridgebench

16,715 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude Opus 4.7 is the best model in the world. It's also benchmaxed. Both are true. Built a first person shooter game, a full website redesign, and a marketing video in one session. The output is real. But it's not the giant leap the benchmarks suggest. Security got worse. Tokens burn 35% faster. 75% of the BridgeMind community agrees it's benchmaxed. Best model. Oversold improvement. Full breakdown below.

Claude Opus 4.7 is the best model in the world. It's also benchmaxed. Both are true. Built a first person shooter game, a full website redesign, and a marketing video in one session. The output is real. But it's not the giant leap the benchmarks suggest. Security got worse. Tokens burn 35% faster. 75% of the BridgeMind community agrees it's benchmaxed. Best model. Oversold improvement. Full breakdown below.

BridgeMind

19,570 次观看 • 5 个月前

Got a 24GB Graphics Card? These 6 coding models all fit on it (Q4): - qwen3.5:27b (17GB) - qwen3.5:35b (24GB) - glm-4.7-flash (19GB) - nemotron-3-nano:30b (24GB) - nemotron-cascade-2:30b (24GB) - gpt-oss:20b (14GB) I gave them the same challenge: draw a campfire with HTML Canvas. Why Canvas? HTML/CSS forgives bad syntax — things still render. JavaScript + Canvas doesn't — one mistake and the screen goes black.

Got a 24GB Graphics Card? These 6 coding models all fit on it (Q4): - qwen3.5:27b (17GB) - qwen3.5:35b (24GB) - glm-4.7-flash (19GB) - nemotron-3-nano:30b (24GB) - nemotron-cascade-2:30b (24GB) - gpt-oss:20b (14GB) I gave them the same challenge: draw a campfire with HTML Canvas. Why Canvas? HTML/CSS forgives bad syntax — things still render. JavaScript + Canvas doesn't — one mistake and the screen goes black.

stevibe

76,096 次观看 • 6 个月前

Opus 4.7 cs GPT 5.4 “make a flappy bird clone” I’ve been running this test for a few models now and this test was the hardest to objectively say who did better. Opus grabbed another version game assets compared to GPT 5.4, - GPT 5.4 however, grabbed the correct game assets. Opus 4.7 beat it on creativity where it grabbed assets (maybe unknowingly) that had a much more diverse set, including nighttime modes and different bird colors GPT 5.4 was able to get the pacing of the game the first shot, whereas Opus had the game running much too fast and then much too slow. But was able to place the metal perfectly in the game card at the end where GPT 5.4 struggled over 10 iterations. All in all both models had essentially made a near perfect game after three shots and are far ahead of the competition in terms of reasoning and effort.

Opus 4.7 cs GPT 5.4 “make a flappy bird clone” I’ve been running this test for a few models now and this test was the hardest to objectively say who did better. Opus grabbed another version game assets compared to GPT 5.4, - GPT 5.4 however, grabbed the correct game assets. Opus 4.7 beat it on creativity where it grabbed assets (maybe unknowingly) that had a much more diverse set, including nighttime modes and different bird colors GPT 5.4 was able to get the pacing of the game the first shot, whereas Opus had the game running much too fast and then much too slow. But was able to place the metal perfectly in the game card at the end where GPT 5.4 struggled over 10 iterations. All in all both models had essentially made a near perfect game after three shots and are far ahead of the competition in terms of reasoning and effort.

Chris

423,821 次观看 • 5 个月前

Ran into a Chinese ML researcher at a rooftop bar in Hudson Yards on Saturday. DeepMind lanyard in his pocket. Two glasses of baijiu in. Loose tie. Laptop open on the bar. Position check running. He saw the screen. "Is that Polymarket" Yeah. "You trade it with Opus 4.7" I nodded. He dragged a stool over. "I ran the internal eval on 4.7 last month. Best reasoning model we've tested on adversarial time-series. Nobody outside the lab is using it for money yet. You're the first I've seen" I asked what the eval looked like. "We hand the model raw wallet data and tell it to find signal. 4.7 finds it faster than our quants. Then legal kills the experiment. Same every quarter" I showed him the scanner. 86M trades. Public dataset nobody outside maintainers touches it. 14,000 wallets in. Filter by floor WR, trade count, size, recency. 9 wallets out. Opus 4.7 chewed it in 38 minutes on a $5 VPS. "Why 4.7 and not Codex" Codex writes code. 4.7 reads behavior. Different problem. "The filter" 40-200 trades. 74+ lifetime WR. Sub $1,500 avg. Active last 45 days. 3 qualifying 21-day windows. "Why those bands" Above 200 is a fund. Below 40 is luck. Between is the edge. A fill landed mid-conversation. +$128 on BTC+100K 5-min. "How does it enter" Each wallet only prints in its zone. 83% crypto. 51% politics. 49% sports. Copy only inside the zone. "Domain conditioning. We published on it in March. Nobody ships it retail" I ship it. Four Python scripts. Claude Code wrote 80% in a weekend. Delay 21 min. Bet size is the signal. $900 normal, $1,600 is 1.8 sigma. Size up. Exit mirrors source. 74.1% of max gain. Stale past 18h under 3% gets cut. Sharpe 2.67 453 trades 81.7% WR $600 seed +$41,985 in 31 days He set the glass down. "4.7 is a weapon on this data. Most people use it to write essays. You built a printer" He leaned in. "One more thing. Rerun the filter with 4.7 every 7 days. The wallet set rotates. Your 9 today are not your 9 in a month" Execution orderbook layer, no middleman. For those who don't build - He pulled out his phone, typed something, stopped. "If anyone at the lab asks, we never spoke" I said we didn't. I found 4.7 myself. He smiled. "Good answer" He finished the baijiu and walked to the elevator.

Ran into a Chinese ML researcher at a rooftop bar in Hudson Yards on Saturday. DeepMind lanyard in his pocket. Two glasses of baijiu in. Loose tie. Laptop open on the bar. Position check running. He saw the screen. "Is that Polymarket" Yeah. "You trade it with Opus 4.7" I nodded. He dragged a stool over. "I ran the internal eval on 4.7 last month. Best reasoning model we've tested on adversarial time-series. Nobody outside the lab is using it for money yet. You're the first I've seen" I asked what the eval looked like. "We hand the model raw wallet data and tell it to find signal. 4.7 finds it faster than our quants. Then legal kills the experiment. Same every quarter" I showed him the scanner. 86M trades. Public dataset nobody outside maintainers touches it. 14,000 wallets in. Filter by floor WR, trade count, size, recency. 9 wallets out. Opus 4.7 chewed it in 38 minutes on a $5 VPS. "Why 4.7 and not Codex" Codex writes code. 4.7 reads behavior. Different problem. "The filter" 40-200 trades. 74+ lifetime WR. Sub $1,500 avg. Active last 45 days. 3 qualifying 21-day windows. "Why those bands" Above 200 is a fund. Below 40 is luck. Between is the edge. A fill landed mid-conversation. +$128 on BTC+100K 5-min. "How does it enter" Each wallet only prints in its zone. 83% crypto. 51% politics. 49% sports. Copy only inside the zone. "Domain conditioning. We published on it in March. Nobody ships it retail" I ship it. Four Python scripts. Claude Code wrote 80% in a weekend. Delay 21 min. Bet size is the signal. $900 normal, $1,600 is 1.8 sigma. Size up. Exit mirrors source. 74.1% of max gain. Stale past 18h under 3% gets cut. Sharpe 2.67 453 trades 81.7% WR $600 seed +$41,985 in 31 days He set the glass down. "4.7 is a weapon on this data. Most people use it to write essays. You built a printer" He leaned in. "One more thing. Rerun the filter with 4.7 every 7 days. The wallet set rotates. Your 9 today are not your 9 in a month" Execution orderbook layer, no middleman. For those who don't build - He pulled out his phone, typed something, stopped. "If anyone at the lab asks, we never spoke" I said we didn't. I found 4.7 myself. He smiled. "Good answer" He finished the baijiu and walked to the elevator.

rari

37,596 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸 Elon isn't stopping at data centers on the ground, he wants the real AI power / massive compute, in space. Imagine 10 gigawatts, hundreds of billions in potential revenue, infrastructure that leaves the planet, and while that’s happening, Grok is already accelerating: - 4.6 in about a week. - 4.7 is going to be special. This feels like Elon is bringing the future into the present, whether we’re ready or not. Writer: Val

🇺🇸 Elon isn't stopping at data centers on the ground, he wants the real AI power / massive compute, in space. Imagine 10 gigawatts, hundreds of billions in potential revenue, infrastructure that leaves the planet, and while that’s happening, Grok is already accelerating: - 4.6 in about a week. - 4.7 is going to be special. This feels like Elon is bringing the future into the present, whether we’re ready or not. Writer: Val

Mario Nawfal

25,641 次观看 • 1 个月前

SORA + GLM-4.6 is next-level 🔥 This duo is insane for producing cinematic, high-quality videos no studios, no teams, no $1K/hour directors. Just two AI tools working together like a full creative department. Here’s how it works: → GLM-4.6 expands your concept into full narratives, detailed character actions, and 5–10 scene prompts → Sora converts GLM-4.6’s prompts into several video versions with perfect visuals, sound, and transitions → GLM-4.6 reviews each clip, checks consistency, improves pacing, and suggests refinements → Sora regenerates the enhanced scenes automatically Ideal for creators and brands testing cinematic content at scale without spending weeks or thousands. The magic is in the combo: GLM-4.6 = story depth + intelligent creative direction Sora = production quality that rivals professional studios While agencies take months, you’re generating 20–30 polished variations in a single afternoon. Test multiple angles. Refine fast. Scale smarter. Like, RT + reply with “SORA” and I’ll DM the full workflow (Must be following so I can DM). Skip this and keep paying agencies $15K/month for a handful of videos.

SORA + GLM-4.6 is next-level 🔥 This duo is insane for producing cinematic, high-quality videos no studios, no teams, no $1K/hour directors. Just two AI tools working together like a full creative department. Here’s how it works: → GLM-4.6 expands your concept into full narratives, detailed character actions, and 5–10 scene prompts → Sora converts GLM-4.6’s prompts into several video versions with perfect visuals, sound, and transitions → GLM-4.6 reviews each clip, checks consistency, improves pacing, and suggests refinements → Sora regenerates the enhanced scenes automatically Ideal for creators and brands testing cinematic content at scale without spending weeks or thousands. The magic is in the combo: GLM-4.6 = story depth + intelligent creative direction Sora = production quality that rivals professional studios While agencies take months, you’re generating 20–30 polished variations in a single afternoon. Test multiple angles. Refine fast. Scale smarter. Like, RT + reply with “SORA” and I’ll DM the full workflow (Must be following so I can DM). Skip this and keep paying agencies $15K/month for a handful of videos.

Md Riyazuddin

81,547 次观看 • 11 个月前