Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Claude Opus 4.8 is LIVE on AIMLAPI - Hour 0 availability! ~4x less likely to let code flaws slip through vs 4.7 Fast mode 2.5x speed, now 3x cheaper Same price: $5/$25 per M tokens To celebrate, it's FREE for selected commentators

AI/ML API

2,689 subscribers

44,740 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Found a way to get $125-$200 in FREE ai credits for gpt-5.6 sol, claude opus 5 and opus 4.8 😳 agentrouter is a non-profit version of openrouter. one api key, no card. credits land on your account at signup. what you get for $0: -$125-200 in credits on signup (github only) -claude opus 5, gpt-5.6 sol, opus 4.8 through one key -free models -openai-compatible (works with anything) what this replaces: -paid frontier API costs for coding agents -claude opus 4.8: $15/M in, $75/M out -gpt-5.6 sol: $25/M out how to grab yours (2 min): 1. go to → sign in with github (important) 2. console → create your api key 3. base url: 4. pick a model and go Works in hermes, claude code, cursor, aider and any openai-compatible tools Important: github-only signup, older accounts get the full credit, fresh ones may get less. credits are one-time. referral adds +$100 use this before they tighten the offer

Found a way to get $125-$200 in FREE ai credits for gpt-5.6 sol, claude opus 5 and opus 4.8 😳 agentrouter is a non-profit version of openrouter. one api key, no card. credits land on your account at signup. what you get for $0: -$125-200 in credits on signup (github only) -claude opus 5, gpt-5.6 sol, opus 4.8 through one key -free models -openai-compatible (works with anything) what this replaces: -paid frontier API costs for coding agents -claude opus 4.8: $15/M in, $75/M out -gpt-5.6 sol: $25/M out how to grab yours (2 min): 1. go to → sign in with github (important) 2. console → create your api key 3. base url: 4. pick a model and go Works in hermes, claude code, cursor, aider and any openai-compatible tools Important: github-only signup, older accounts get the full credit, fresh ones may get less. credits are one-time. referral adds +$100 use this before they tighten the offer

painn

107,042 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🚨 do you understand what happened to Claude.. Anthropic just shipped Opus 4.8 with something called dynamic workflows. It no longer works alone - it spins up hundreds of agents that argue, verify, and break each other's work until the answer is right. - A dev used it to port Bun from Zig to Rust in 11 days - 750,000 lines of Rust, 99.8 percent of tests passing - Hundreds of agents ran in parallel with two reviewers per file - Fast mode runs the same model 2.5x faster and 3x cheaper than before work you used to plan in quarters now finishes before the weekend

🚨 do you understand what happened to Claude.. Anthropic just shipped Opus 4.8 with something called dynamic workflows. It no longer works alone - it spins up hundreds of agents that argue, verify, and break each other's work until the answer is right. - A dev used it to port Bun from Zig to Rust in 11 days - 750,000 lines of Rust, 99.8 percent of tests passing - Hundreds of agents ran in parallel with two reviewers per file - Fast mode runs the same model 2.5x faster and 3x cheaper than before work you used to plan in quarters now finishes before the weekend

BuBBliK

431,325 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Bridgebench

16,715 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Code /simplify is now /code-review Now accepts an effort parameter: - low: short, scoped, latency-sensitive tasks that aren't intelligence-sensitive - medium: cost-sensitive work that can trade off some intelligence for fewer tokens - high: balances tokens and intelligence. Minimum for intelligence-sensitive work, or to cut spend vs xhigh - xhigh: best results for most coding and agentic tasks. Recommended default on Opus 4.7 - max: can improve performance on demanding tasks but shows diminishing returns and tends to overthink. Test before adopting broadly

Claude Code /simplify is now /code-review Now accepts an effort parameter: - low: short, scoped, latency-sensitive tasks that aren't intelligence-sensitive - medium: cost-sensitive work that can trade off some intelligence for fewer tokens - high: balances tokens and intelligence. Minimum for intelligence-sensitive work, or to cut spend vs xhigh - xhigh: best results for most coding and agentic tasks. Recommended default on Opus 4.7 - max: can improve performance on demanding tasks but shows diminishing returns and tends to overthink. Test before adopting broadly

Daniel San

85,822 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

20,113 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🤩 75% cheaper Image upscaling 🤑 GPU costs for image upscaling from 1 to 4 Megapixels are less then a penny now 💵 Since the speed improvements I made, Clarity Upscaler now runs just as fast on both the cheaper A40 and the pricier A100 GPUs. The total GPU costs have decreased to just 25% of the amount before the improvement App users on Premium and Business get much more tokens now 😀App: ⚙️API: 🛠️Code:

🤩 75% cheaper Image upscaling 🤑 GPU costs for image upscaling from 1 to 4 Megapixels are less then a penny now 💵 Since the speed improvements I made, Clarity Upscaler now runs just as fast on both the cheaper A40 and the pricier A100 GPUs. The total GPU costs have decreased to just 25% of the amount before the improvement App users on Premium and Business get much more tokens now 😀App: ⚙️API: 🛠️Code:

philz1337x

69,210 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is definitely capable, but this test honestly surprised me. I gave it the same macOS-style web OS challenge and it spent 1 hour and 56 minutes, burned through 66k+ tokens, and still produced a result that was worse than what Qwen 3.7-Max generated. The biggest issue isn't quality, it's efficiency. Opus 4.8 can absolutely cook when given enough time, but the token usage and runtime are becoming harder and harder to justify when cheaper models are delivering comparable or even better results. Full Breakdown: The frontier is getting very competitive. 👀

Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is definitely capable, but this test honestly surprised me. I gave it the same macOS-style web OS challenge and it spent 1 hour and 56 minutes, burned through 66k+ tokens, and still produced a result that was worse than what Qwen 3.7-Max generated. The biggest issue isn't quality, it's efficiency. Opus 4.8 can absolutely cook when given enough time, but the token usage and runtime are becoming harder and harder to justify when cheaper models are delivering comparable or even better results. Full Breakdown: The frontier is getting very competitive. 👀

WorldofAI

123,550 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT$

This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT

CyrilXBT

198,085 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Voice mode is rolling out now in Claude Code. It’s live for ~5% of users today, and will be ramping through the coming weeks. You'll see a note on the welcome screen once you have access. /voice to toggle it on!

Voice mode is rolling out now in Claude Code. It’s live for ~5% of users today, and will be ramping through the coming weeks. You'll see a note on the welcome screen once you have access. /voice to toggle it on!

Thariq

3,614,664 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🎬 Video is now live on Runware! Run top models like SeeDance 1.0, Hailuo 02, Veo 3, Kling 2.1 — at the lowest price per video. On average 35% cheaper than anyone else. To celebrate, get $10 free credit and up to $250K in bonuses for high volume. 🧵👇

🎬 Video is now live on Runware! Run top models like SeeDance 1.0, Hailuo 02, Veo 3, Kling 2.1 — at the lowest price per video. On average 35% cheaper than anyone else. To celebrate, get $10 free credit and up to $250K in bonuses for high volume. 🧵👇

Runware

736,451 просмотров • 1 год назад

> 20 free daily tokens covers a full working session on GPT 5.5 or GLM > Opus 4.7 handles 2-3 serious architecture tasks per day at zero cost > one GitHub account can link to multiple Tembo accounts, the math on that is obvious > 5 minutes to sign up. 10 minutes to your first merged PR > no clarifying questions, prompts have to be precise, the agent just executes > the $100/month tools and the $0 tool are now producing the same output on most tasks and most developers haven't noticed yet this is not a discount → this is the same models → the same → capability → the same output → for nothing!

> 20 free daily tokens covers a full working session on GPT 5.5 or GLM > Opus 4.7 handles 2-3 serious architecture tasks per day at zero cost > one GitHub account can link to multiple Tembo accounts, the math on that is obvious > 5 minutes to sign up. 10 minutes to your first merged PR > no clarifying questions, prompts have to be precise, the agent just executes > the $100/month tools and the $0 tool are now producing the same output on most tasks and most developers haven't noticed yet this is not a discount → this is the same models → the same → capability → the same output → for nothing!

Shadow Nick

26,539 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FREE Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GPT-5.6 in one IDE. Alibaba built it, 520 credits at signup - one Sonnet 5 message eats 4. It's called Accio. Web or Windows desktop, both free. Registration takes 30 seconds via Google or email. Inside: → Fable 5 for creative and long-context work. → Opus 4.6 through 4.8 - the full Anthropic frontier lineup. → Sonnet 5 for speed and reasoning at pennies per message. → GPT-5.5 for OpenAI native tasks. → Gemini 3.1 Pro and 3.5 Flash for multimodal. Real math: 520 credits divided by 4 = 130 Sonnet 5 messages in your first week. Cheaper models drop that even further. Anthropic charges $20/month for the same access with weekly limits. Custom MCP support built in. Profile > Settings > MCP. Every agent workflow you've built for Claude Desktop ports over instantly. Setup: → Go to accio(.)com → Sign up with Google → 520 credits land automatically → Pick your model and start firing prompts Bookmark this before Alibaba puts it behind a paywall.

Atenov int.

31,157 просмотров • 24 дней назад

someone just rebuilt claude code in pure python and made it ~230x cheaper to run it's called clawcodex. a full from-scratch port of the claude code agent loop. 230k+ lines of python, MIT licensed it keeps your request prefix byte-stable, so DeepSeek's prompt cache covers your entire system + tools + history on every turn cache-hit input then bills at ~$0.0435 per 1M tokens the same 1M tokens on Claude Fable 5 runs you $10 so the longer you code, the more the cache pays off what you actually get: → 25 LLM providers (Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, GLM, local ollama) → 1M token context window → real agent loop: tools, skills, REPL, session history → one-line install, mac/linux/wsl and it's sitting at 677 stars. basically nobody is looking yet bookmark this before it gone

someone just rebuilt claude code in pure python and made it ~230x cheaper to run it's called clawcodex. a full from-scratch port of the claude code agent loop. 230k+ lines of python, MIT licensed it keeps your request prefix byte-stable, so DeepSeek's prompt cache covers your entire system + tools + history on every turn cache-hit input then bills at ~$0.0435 per 1M tokens the same 1M tokens on Claude Fable 5 runs you $10 so the longer you code, the more the cache pays off what you actually get: → 25 LLM providers (Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, GLM, local ollama) → 1M token context window → real agent loop: tools, skills, REPL, session history → one-line install, mac/linux/wsl and it's sitting at 677 stars. basically nobody is looking yet bookmark this before it gone

Argona

51,369 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Grok 4.5 might be the BEST model to run inside Hermes or OpenClaw RIGHT NOW. I've been sleeping on Grok to be honestNot anymore. It's more than 60% cheaper than Opus 4.8 and lands around $2.49 per task versus ~$12 for Fable in Claude Code. And it's fast. So what happens when you give Hermes + Grok 4.5 its own email, its own phone number, its own debit card, and access to every tool you use? You pretty much get an AI co-founder. Everything you need to know about Grok 4.5 + Hermes below. Full episode is available to watch at The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 ( thanks Nick Vasilescu for coming on) I slept on Grok. Not sleeping on it anymore. Watch

Grok 4.5 might be the BEST model to run inside Hermes or OpenClaw RIGHT NOW. I've been sleeping on Grok to be honestNot anymore. It's more than 60% cheaper than Opus 4.8 and lands around $2.49 per task versus ~$12 for Fable in Claude Code. And it's fast. So what happens when you give Hermes + Grok 4.5 its own email, its own phone number, its own debit card, and access to every tool you use? You pretty much get an AI co-founder. Everything you need to know about Grok 4.5 + Hermes below. Full episode is available to watch at The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 ( thanks Nick Vasilescu for coming on) I slept on Grok. Not sleeping on it anymore. Watch

GREG ISENBERG

254,254 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"I burned roughly $5,000 of API tokens in a few hours for $200. It's 100x subsidized. This is insanity" Kain on running 500+ agents to decompose an entire codebase on Claude Opus 4.8 "I set up my own personal account to test this on Opus 4.8. I know enough that I can come up with a task that's gonna burn a fuckload. In the course of four hours I used something like 200 million tokens and didn't hit any limits" "It was hundreds of agents, like 500 or 600 agents decomposing a codebase. It would have been somewhere on the order of $5,000 with API metered tokens, and I know how much tokens cost because that's where I live" "I ran this overnight multiple times. It's very possible I could have burned through $20,000 worth of API credits for $200. I knew it was subsidized, but it's subsidized to a level that's crazy. It's 100x subsidized"

"I burned roughly $5,000 of API tokens in a few hours for $200. It's 100x subsidized. This is insanity" Kain on running 500+ agents to decompose an entire codebase on Claude Opus 4.8 "I set up my own personal account to test this on Opus 4.8. I know enough that I can come up with a task that's gonna burn a fuckload. In the course of four hours I used something like 200 million tokens and didn't hit any limits" "It was hundreds of agents, like 500 or 600 agents decomposing a codebase. It would have been somewhere on the order of $5,000 with API metered tokens, and I know how much tokens cost because that's where I live" "I ran this overnight multiple times. It's very possible I could have burned through $20,000 worth of API credits for $200. I knew it was subsidized, but it's subsidized to a level that's crazy. It's 100x subsidized"

Laura Shin

85,115 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

meta just dropped a bomb. Muse Spark 1.1 is 86% cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol and 91% cheaper than Fable 5 on output tokens ($4.25 vs $30 vs $50 per M) I thought the model was going to be horrendous, but it ended up being insanely fast, and very capable. front end design is VERY strong. Agentic capabilities seem great as it was able to spawn and even orchestrate other agents inside my app cnvs using the mcp and cli tool with zero instruction. we have soo many insanely good models right now.

meta just dropped a bomb. Muse Spark 1.1 is 86% cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol and 91% cheaper than Fable 5 on output tokens ($4.25 vs $30 vs $50 per M) I thought the model was going to be horrendous, but it ended up being insanely fast, and very capable. front end design is VERY strong. Agentic capabilities seem great as it was able to spawn and even orchestrate other agents inside my app cnvs using the mcp and cli tool with zero instruction. we have soo many insanely good models right now.

Max Blade

88,001 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AMD'S NEW MINI PC RUNS CLAUDE CODE OFFLINE FOR $0/MONTH AND REPLACES $200 OPENAI + $200 CLAUDE CODE SUBSCRIPTIONS amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 is the first x86 chip that runs a 200 billion parameter model on a single piece of silicon with 128gb of unified memory the gmktec evo-x2 runs qwen3 coder 30b at 40 to 50 tokens per second and llama 3.3 70b at 20 to 25 tokens per second locally. on linux you get 110gb of usable vram out of 128gb setup takes 90 minutes. wipe windows for linux, install ollama with one command, pull the model, point claude code at localhost. same interface, same agent loop, nothing leaves your network a heavy ai user pays $200 for claude code max, $200 for chatgpt pro and $20 for cursor. that's $5,040 a year and the box pays itself off in 5 months after break-even every month is $420 that used to leave your account. three year math is roughly $13,000 not paid to ai companies plus zero rate limits on overnight agents bookmark this and read the article below

AMD'S NEW MINI PC RUNS CLAUDE CODE OFFLINE FOR $0/MONTH AND REPLACES $200 OPENAI + $200 CLAUDE CODE SUBSCRIPTIONS amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 is the first x86 chip that runs a 200 billion parameter model on a single piece of silicon with 128gb of unified memory the gmktec evo-x2 runs qwen3 coder 30b at 40 to 50 tokens per second and llama 3.3 70b at 20 to 25 tokens per second locally. on linux you get 110gb of usable vram out of 128gb setup takes 90 minutes. wipe windows for linux, install ollama with one command, pull the model, point claude code at localhost. same interface, same agent loop, nothing leaves your network a heavy ai user pays $200 for claude code max, $200 for chatgpt pro and $20 for cursor. that's $5,040 a year and the box pays itself off in 5 months after break-even every month is $420 that used to leave your account. three year math is roughly $13,000 not paid to ai companies plus zero rate limits on overnight agents bookmark this and read the article below

starmex

33,516 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: GPT-5.5 "Spud" is out and it is a BEAST We've been testing it Every 📧 for the last 3 weeks on everything from coding, to writing, to knowledge work. Here's our day 0 vibe check: - It's a step change in coding AND it's easy to talk to. It's fast and friendly and quickly became my daily driver. But it's also a coding powerhouse—a really rare combination. - It scored 62/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark. Opus 4.7 scored only a 33/100. (But GPT-5.5 performed best when using an Opus 4.7 plan). Naveen Naidu used over 900 million tokens during testing—and it let him ship production features for Monologue at both high speed and quality. - It has serious conceptual clarity. It can hold a complex plan in its head over hours of work, without getting distracted by existing code. This makes it the first model that we've tested that can perform well on complex refactors requiring deleting and reimagining an substantial existing codebase. - It's a very good writer. This is the first OpenAI model in about a year that got our writers Every 📧 to switch away from Claude. 5.5 has Katie Parrott's seal of approval—not an easy task. Its writing feels more organic and it's better at mimicking a writing style without going overboard. - It's great for agentic knowledge-work. This is the first OpenAI model that manages to be both a stellar senior engineer AND that can be used for everything from spreadsheets to research. It's crazy fast, and it's amazing inside of the Codex desktop app, and got much of our team to switch away from Claude Code and Cowork during the testing period. However, it's not a perfect model. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 on plan quality. It's plans are extremely readable but Opus has better attention to detail and sharper insight. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 by a bit on front-end and full-stack product work. Kieran Klaassen found that it wasn't quite as good when full-stack thinking and design are involved. And it's not great writing Ruby. - 5.5 is a great vibe coder but if you're vibe coding without a plan it's worse than Opus. Mike Taylor found that Opus is better at reading in between the lines on underspecified vibe-coding tasks. Overall GPT-5.5 is a massive achievement from OpenAI and it deserves a serious look as your daily driver. Read our full vibe check on Every 📧 here:

BREAKING: GPT-5.5 "Spud" is out and it is a BEAST We've been testing it Every 📧 for the last 3 weeks on everything from coding, to writing, to knowledge work. Here's our day 0 vibe check: - It's a step change in coding AND it's easy to talk to. It's fast and friendly and quickly became my daily driver. But it's also a coding powerhouse—a really rare combination. - It scored 62/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark. Opus 4.7 scored only a 33/100. (But GPT-5.5 performed best when using an Opus 4.7 plan). Naveen Naidu used over 900 million tokens during testing—and it let him ship production features for Monologue at both high speed and quality. - It has serious conceptual clarity. It can hold a complex plan in its head over hours of work, without getting distracted by existing code. This makes it the first model that we've tested that can perform well on complex refactors requiring deleting and reimagining an substantial existing codebase. - It's a very good writer. This is the first OpenAI model in about a year that got our writers Every 📧 to switch away from Claude. 5.5 has Katie Parrott's seal of approval—not an easy task. Its writing feels more organic and it's better at mimicking a writing style without going overboard. - It's great for agentic knowledge-work. This is the first OpenAI model that manages to be both a stellar senior engineer AND that can be used for everything from spreadsheets to research. It's crazy fast, and it's amazing inside of the Codex desktop app, and got much of our team to switch away from Claude Code and Cowork during the testing period. However, it's not a perfect model. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 on plan quality. It's plans are extremely readable but Opus has better attention to detail and sharper insight. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 by a bit on front-end and full-stack product work. Kieran Klaassen found that it wasn't quite as good when full-stack thinking and design are involved. And it's not great writing Ruby. - 5.5 is a great vibe coder but if you're vibe coding without a plan it's worse than Opus. Mike Taylor found that Opus is better at reading in between the lines on underspecified vibe-coding tasks. Overall GPT-5.5 is a massive achievement from OpenAI and it deserves a serious look as your daily driver. Read our full vibe check on Every 📧 here:

Dan Shipper 📧

130,382 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)$

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

194,949 просмотров • 1 год назад

HERMES DESKTOP APP JUST GOT A NEW ULTRA MODE FOR DEEPSEEK V4 PRO – AND IT COSTS ABOUT $1 A DAY TO RUN If you're using Hermes desktop app, you're probably already running DeepSeek – it's one of the top models available. The update: → DeepSeek V4 Pro now has thinking mode, fast mode, and a brand new ultra mode → There's also an extra high mode, but the real upgrade is ultra The actual cost: roughly $1/day for a normal workflow. That's about $20-25/month – basically the same as before, just with a significantly faster mode unlocked. The verdict after a full day of testing: it flies through tool calling. Noticeably faster, same price range. If you're already paying for DeepSeek through Hermes, this is a free upgrade sitting in your settings right now. Update Hermes, grab the DeepSeek API if you don't have it yet, and try V4 Pro on ultra. Bookmark this, you'll want to come back to it later.

SCOTTY BEAM

24,032 просмотров • 20 дней назад