Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Claude Opus (Claude) is ACTUALLY getting dumber. We ran benchmarks — it scored 40% on tests it designed itself. ChatGPT 4.5 crushed it at 63%. Anthropic is quietly throttling Opus to save compute for their next model. Here's the proof 👇

Boxmining

176,431 subscribers

66,404 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Claude Opus 4.7 just dropped (Claude) and we tested it so you don't have to. Spoiler: it's basically Opus 4.6 with a price hike. We ran the benchmarks. We built the games. We hit the rate limits. The results? Not what Anthropic promised. 👇 Watch the full breakdown before you upgrade:

🚨 Claude Opus 4.7 just dropped (Claude) and we tested it so you don't have to. Spoiler: it's basically Opus 4.6 with a price hike. We ran the benchmarks. We built the games. We hit the rate limits. The results? Not what Anthropic promised. 👇 Watch the full breakdown before you upgrade:

Boxmining

11,565 views • 3 months ago

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

CG

343,231 views • 1 month ago

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,562 views • 3 months ago

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Ziwen

130,830 views • 3 months ago

Claude Opus 4.5 is now rolling out to GitHub Copilot in public preview, and will be available at a promotional 1x premium request multiplier through December 5! 🙌 Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.5 👀 - Surpassed internal coding benchmarks, while cutting token usage in half - Is great for code migration and code refactoring See it in action, and try it for yourself.

Claude Opus 4.5 is now rolling out to GitHub Copilot in public preview, and will be available at a promotional 1x premium request multiplier through December 5! 🙌 Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.5 👀 - Surpassed internal coding benchmarks, while cutting token usage in half - Is great for code migration and code refactoring See it in action, and try it for yourself.

GitHub

217,344 views • 7 months ago

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

52,868 views • 1 month ago

Spending too much on Claude Opus for OpenClaw? We tested MiniMax (official) at $0.30 vs $5 per million tokens. It's 95% as good BUT you need these tricks to make it work. We break down exactly how to optimize it & save hundreds.

Spending too much on Claude Opus for OpenClaw? We tested MiniMax (official) at $0.30 vs $5 per million tokens. It's 95% as good BUT you need these tricks to make it work. We break down exactly how to optimize it & save hundreds.

Boxmining

37,978 views • 4 months ago

Claude Opus 4.8 is now available in Fast mode in Perplexity Computer, giving you faster responses at the same quality. Turn it on with the Fast toggle under Claude Opus 4.8 in the model picker. Live now on the web for all Computer users.

Claude Opus 4.8 is now available in Fast mode in Perplexity Computer, giving you faster responses at the same quality. Turn it on with the Fast toggle under Claude Opus 4.8 in the model picker. Live now on the web for all Computer users.

Computer

55,141 views • 7 days ago

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.

GREG ISENBERG

84,982 views • 7 months ago

We ran Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 against our hardest benchmark - complex concurrency bugs that require multi-step reasoning. Almost 20% better than previous generations. Here's what we did to get it production-ready and what you can take from it for your own stack 👇

We ran Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 against our hardest benchmark - complex concurrency bugs that require multi-step reasoning. Almost 20% better than previous generations. Here's what we did to get it production-ready and what you can take from it for your own stack 👇

CodeRabbit

10,896 views • 3 months ago

Claude Opus 4.6 is so strong at financial analysis, including crunching data and reading SEC filings, that after it launched, financial data stocks sold off, with FactSet dropping nearly 10%. Claude Opus 4.6 can analyze company data, filings, and market info to produce deep financial analysis in hours instead of days. On an internal Real-World Finance evaluation of about 50 tasks spanning spreadsheets, slide decks, and word document creation and review, it scores over 23 percentage points higher than Claude Sonnet 4.5. On Vals AI benchmarks, it reports 60.7% on Finance Agent, which tests research over SEC filings, and 76.0% on TaxEval, which tests tax reasoning, with Finance Agent up 5.47% over Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.6 is so strong at financial analysis, including crunching data and reading SEC filings, that after it launched, financial data stocks sold off, with FactSet dropping nearly 10%. Claude Opus 4.6 can analyze company data, filings, and market info to produce deep financial analysis in hours instead of days. On an internal Real-World Finance evaluation of about 50 tasks spanning spreadsheets, slide decks, and word document creation and review, it scores over 23 percentage points higher than Claude Sonnet 4.5. On Vals AI benchmarks, it reports 60.7% on Finance Agent, which tests research over SEC filings, and 76.0% on TaxEval, which tests tax reasoning, with Finance Agent up 5.47% over Opus 4.5.

Rohan Paul

465,744 views • 5 months ago

Anthropic is in trouble and nobody wants to say it out loud. Opus 4.7 is the first Claude model people think is worse, usage limits are hitting fast, compute is running thin, and Anthropic's best model still isn't out. GPT-5.5 just dropped today, OpenAI found their window. This 32 minute video is worth more than the next episode of whatever you're watching on Netflix tonight.

Anthropic is in trouble and nobody wants to say it out loud. Opus 4.7 is the first Claude model people think is worse, usage limits are hitting fast, compute is running thin, and Anthropic's best model still isn't out. GPT-5.5 just dropped today, OpenAI found their window. This 32 minute video is worth more than the next episode of whatever you're watching on Netflix tonight.

Defileo🔮

131,838 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.1 It outperforms OpenAI o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen-3 Coder on agentic coding and tool use. Claude Code is going to get incredibly better.

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.1 It outperforms OpenAI o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen-3 Coder on agentic coding and tool use. Claude Code is going to get incredibly better.

Shubham Saboo

26,252 views • 11 months ago

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,659 views • 5 months ago

Anthropic CEO: “ I have engineers within anthropic who don’t write any code, they just let Claude write the code and they edit it and look it over” “At anthropic writing code means designing the next version of Claude it self, so we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself, not completely but most of it”. In the last 52 days, the Claude team dropped 50+ major feature launches. This is literally INSANE.

Anthropic CEO: “ I have engineers within anthropic who don’t write any code, they just let Claude write the code and they edit it and look it over” “At anthropic writing code means designing the next version of Claude it self, so we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself, not completely but most of it”. In the last 52 days, the Claude team dropped 50+ major feature launches. This is literally INSANE.

CG

2,267,914 views • 3 months ago

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.

Movez

549,021 views • 16 days ago

Introducing Maestro ✨ A framework for Claude Opus to orchestrate subagents. Simply ask for a goal, and Opus will break it down and intelligently orchestrate instances of Haiku to execute subtasks, which Opus will review at the end. 🧙‍♂️ The output is saved as markdown 👇

Introducing Maestro ✨ A framework for Claude Opus to orchestrate subagents. Simply ask for a goal, and Opus will break it down and intelligently orchestrate instances of Haiku to execute subtasks, which Opus will review at the end. 🧙‍♂️ The output is saved as markdown 👇

Pietro Schirano

171,417 views • 2 years ago

Claude Opus 4.5 is the most powerful AI model ever released It allows you to build apps with 0 technical knowledge needed You MUST try it In this video I go over how to get the most out of Opus and how to build incredible apps with it, even if you've never coded before:

Claude Opus 4.5 is the most powerful AI model ever released It allows you to build apps with 0 technical knowledge needed You MUST try it In this video I go over how to get the most out of Opus and how to build incredible apps with it, even if you've never coded before:

Alex Finn

32,627 views • 7 months ago

Which AI model should you use for OpenClaw? 🤖 I tested the top models on WildClaw benchmarks—Claude Opus vs GPT-4 vs MiniMax vs the new GLM-5. The results might surprise you (spoiler: speed & cost matter more than you think)

Which AI model should you use for OpenClaw? 🤖 I tested the top models on WildClaw benchmarks—Claude Opus vs GPT-4 vs MiniMax vs the new GLM-5. The results might surprise you (spoiler: speed & cost matter more than you think)

Boxmining

14,908 views • 3 months ago

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

149,945 views • 9 days ago