Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Claude Opus -> GLM 5.2 in under 10 seconds dcode isn't just provider-agnostic. it makes the cross-model experience nice

Alex Olsen

2,307 subscribers

23,028 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Musik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Chetaslua

22,607 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

You can now use GLM 5.2 in Omma Canvas. Strong model for frontend generation. Enable it on canvas using the "Higher" mode.

You can now use GLM 5.2 in Omma Canvas. Strong model for frontend generation. Enable it on canvas using the "Higher" mode.

Omma AI

13,059 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

To make it easier to migrate your workflows, we've updated the claude-api skill in Claude Code with Opus 4.7 support. Just say "migrate to Opus 4.7" and it updates model names, prompts, and effort settings for you.

To make it easier to migrate your workflows, we've updated the claude-api skill in Claude Code with Opus 4.7 support. Just say "migrate to Opus 4.7" and it updates model names, prompts, and effort settings for you.

ClaudeDevs

362,046 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This free model just beat every closed-source AI on coding benchmarks. Open weights. 6x cheaper than Opus. The labs don't want you to know it exists. > GLM-5.2 from Zai just topped Code Arena - the first open-weights model to ever hold the #1 coding spot. Not a leaked weight, not a fine-tune. A fully open model beating GPT and Claude on their own turf. It's live on Hugging Face Inference API right now. 5 providers: Novita, Together AI, Fireworks, Deepinfra, Zai. OpenAI-compatible client. → Go to huggingface(.)co → grab HF_TOKEN from account settings → plug into any OpenAI-compatible client 6x cheaper than Opus. Companies bleeding on AI bills are already routing to this for orchestration, caching, and token optimization. The smart money moved before the headline dropped. > Now you know. huggingface(.)co/zai-org/GLM-5.2 Bookmark this before everyone else figures it out.

This free model just beat every closed-source AI on coding benchmarks. Open weights. 6x cheaper than Opus. The labs don't want you to know it exists. > GLM-5.2 from Zai just topped Code Arena - the first open-weights model to ever hold the #1 coding spot. Not a leaked weight, not a fine-tune. A fully open model beating GPT and Claude on their own turf. It's live on Hugging Face Inference API right now. 5 providers: Novita, Together AI, Fireworks, Deepinfra, Zai. OpenAI-compatible client. → Go to huggingface(.)co → grab HF_TOKEN from account settings → plug into any OpenAI-compatible client 6x cheaper than Opus. Companies bleeding on AI bills are already routing to this for orchestration, caching, and token optimization. The smart money moved before the headline dropped. > Now you know. huggingface(.)co/zai-org/GLM-5.2 Bookmark this before everyone else figures it out.

Atenov int.

12,395 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Comparisons to Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-Codex, Gemini 3 Flash, and Kimi K2.5 👇 Prompt: Make me an interactive, 3d model of the solar system.

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Comparisons to Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-Codex, Gemini 3 Flash, and Kimi K2.5 👇 Prompt: Make me an interactive, 3d model of the solar system.

Orchids

22,774 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is wild. Anthropic just dropped Claude 4 and it will completely change the AI coding game. 10 wild examples: 1. Flight simulator using Claude 4 Opus

This is wild. Anthropic just dropped Claude 4 and it will completely change the AI coding game. 10 wild examples: 1. Flight simulator using Claude 4 Opus

Min Choi

966,437 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

so claude code now... > writes the code > opens the app it just built > clicks through every screen > finds the bugs itself > fixes them > repeats until it works nice

so claude code now... > writes the code > opens the app it just built > clicks through every screen > finds the bugs itself > fixes them > repeats until it works nice

J.B.

1,349,193 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

claude fable 5 has solved CAD I asked it to make a model of a V8 engine It came back to me with a fully working model in under 10 minutes

claude fable 5 has solved CAD I asked it to make a model of a V8 engine It came back to me with a fully working model in under 10 minutes

Aaron Li

863,041 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

104,522 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Tried to extend the previous video (second video from 10 seconds) but the quality goes to shit fast and also it isn't continuous, but nice we tried!

Tried to extend the previous video (second video from 10 seconds) but the quality goes to shit fast and also it isn't continuous, but nice we tried!

@levelsio

43,174 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Open weights just caught up to the frontier. GLM-5.2 from Z.ai tops the open-model rankings on Artificial Analysis and Arena.ai's Agent Arena. It's now live on CoreWeave Serverless Inference at $1.39 in and $4.40 out per 1M tokens. Ship more for less.

Open weights just caught up to the frontier. GLM-5.2 from Z.ai tops the open-model rankings on Artificial Analysis and Arena.ai's Agent Arena. It's now live on CoreWeave Serverless Inference at $1.39 in and $4.40 out per 1M tokens. Ship more for less.

CoreWeave

16,510 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

I finally got an open model to do structural biology by itself 🔥 GLM-5.2 drives the Mol* viewer, judges its own render through Qwen3-VL, and refines until the drug pops in its pocket. Then I spun it in 3D. All open, on Hugging Face. What should it build next?

I finally got an open model to do structural biology by itself 🔥 GLM-5.2 drives the Mol* viewer, judges its own render through Qwen3-VL, and refines until the drug pops in its pocket. Then I spun it in 3D. All open, on Hugging Face. What should it build next?

Maziyar PANAHI

60,363 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

I literally don't use Claude anymore... Just Claude Code and Codex in the web. This is a presentation I had Opus generate after doing research... And if you save the prompt you can have it generate in any style you want.

I literally don't use Claude anymore... Just Claude Code and Codex in the web. This is a presentation I had Opus generate after doing research... And if you save the prompt you can have it generate in any style you want.

Riley Brown

118,000 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Claude Code's effort parameter is something you need to keep in mind before starting any task It's not just about picking the right model anymore (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus). Now you also need to think about which effort level to use before each task. One tip I always go back to: when Opus can't solve a problem, just adding ultrathink makes things click, it's almost magic. We wrote a post at Hedgineer benchmarking each effort level by cost and time Read it here:

Claude Code's effort parameter is something you need to keep in mind before starting any task It's not just about picking the right model anymore (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus). Now you also need to think about which effort level to use before each task. One tip I always go back to: when Opus can't solve a problem, just adding ultrathink makes things click, it's almost magic. We wrote a post at Hedgineer benchmarking each effort level by cost and time Read it here:

Daniel San

66,147 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

> spend 5 hours on a project > claude does it in 15 minutes > "yeah but it's not the same" > it's the same > you can't tell > client can't tell > nobody can tell > you just lost 5 hours denying ai > claude won again

> spend 5 hours on a project > claude does it in 15 minutes > "yeah but it's not the same" > it's the same > you can't tell > client can't tell > nobody can tell > you just lost 5 hours denying ai > claude won again

darkzodchi

1,211,226 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Very strange behavior in Claude Code: after specifically telling Claude to use gemini-3-flash-preview, (and even explaining that it's a new model that just came out), Claude refuses to use it, getting stuck in a loop of making non-edits which keep the old version. It gets skeptical and apparently doesn't believe that the model exists (?)

Very strange behavior in Claude Code: after specifically telling Claude to use gemini-3-flash-preview, (and even explaining that it's a new model that just came out), Claude refuses to use it, getting stuck in a loop of making non-edits which keep the old version. It gets skeptical and apparently doesn't believe that the model exists (?)

Benjamin De Kraker

34,305 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

> spent 14 years doing SEO. > then built this 20-prompt system in Claude > Claude just did 30 hours of SEO work before lunch > it didn't have to be like this > 20 prompts. the game has changed.

> spent 14 years doing SEO. > then built this 20-prompt system in Claude > Claude just did 30 hours of SEO work before lunch > it didn't have to be like this > 20 prompts. the game has changed.

Sarvesh Shrivastava

41,923 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

> I spent 14 years doing SEO the hard way. > then built this 20-prompt system in Claude > Claude just did 30 hours of SEO work before lunch > it didn't have to be like this > 20 prompts. the game has changed. > you're welcome.

> I spent 14 years doing SEO the hard way. > then built this 20-prompt system in Claude > Claude just did 30 hours of SEO work before lunch > it didn't have to be like this > 20 prompts. the game has changed. > you're welcome.

Sarvesh Shrivastava

72,824 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

MiniMax M2.5 is benchmaxed. I gave 4 models the same prompt: Create a neon "OPEN" sign in HTML. GLM 5: Clean, classic neon. Nailed it. Claude Opus 4.6: Stylized with glow. Solid. Gemini 3 Pro: Cursive with bloom lighting. Creative. MiniMax M2.5: Spelled it "O b∈ N" with broken spacing. This model ranks #2 on BridgeBench with a 59.7 score and 100% completion rate. But it can't spell a 4-letter word. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story. A model can ace structured tasks and fail basic creative prompts. High score ≠ production ready.

MiniMax M2.5 is benchmaxed. I gave 4 models the same prompt: Create a neon "OPEN" sign in HTML. GLM 5: Clean, classic neon. Nailed it. Claude Opus 4.6: Stylized with glow. Solid. Gemini 3 Pro: Cursive with bloom lighting. Creative. MiniMax M2.5: Spelled it "O b∈ N" with broken spacing. This model ranks #2 on BridgeBench with a 59.7 score and 100% completion rate. But it can't spell a 4-letter word. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story. A model can ace structured tasks and fail basic creative prompts. High score ≠ production ready.

BridgeMind

54,212 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

You don’t have to use one model (or one provider!) for everything. With Workshop, you can combine frontier and local models in the same workflow. For example: Opus can be the main agent, and delegate specific tasks to Gemma 4 via subagents. Better quality where it matters. Better privacy, speed, and cost where it counts. One workflow, best model for each task.

You don’t have to use one model (or one provider!) for everything. With Workshop, you can combine frontier and local models in the same workflow. For example: Opus can be the main agent, and delegate specific tasks to Gemma 4 via subagents. Better quality where it matters. Better privacy, speed, and cost where it counts. One workflow, best model for each task.

Workshop AI

894,946 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten