正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with... motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".show more

Miraqle

4,677 subscribers

206,624 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Claude can't, but GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE is IMMACULATE Here's how you create it step by step: > open the new desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. this is taste work, don't give it to the small models > feed it 2-3 sites you love and one line: "extract the art direction: mood, motion, typography, pacing. write it down as a style bible" > then the brief, one paragraph, goal not steps: "resort site for [name]. cinematic scroll, the booking button always one glance away. follow the style bible" > add house rules: no template hero-with-three-cards, no stock gradients, motion carries the story, every section earns its scroll > set the bar: "a working designer can't tell this from an agency build." then spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context to grade against that bar. the builder never grades itself > loop it: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. walk away, it doesn't need you in the room > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, no hosting, no deploy The deeper version of every step (the contract, the rules, the verifier trick, when to spend on Ultra) is in the article below.

Claude can't, but GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE is IMMACULATE Here's how you create it step by step: > open the new desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. this is taste work, don't give it to the small models > feed it 2-3 sites you love and one line: "extract the art direction: mood, motion, typography, pacing. write it down as a style bible" > then the brief, one paragraph, goal not steps: "resort site for [name]. cinematic scroll, the booking button always one glance away. follow the style bible" > add house rules: no template hero-with-three-cards, no stock gradients, motion carries the story, every section earns its scroll > set the bar: "a working designer can't tell this from an agency build." then spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context to grade against that bar. the builder never grades itself > loop it: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. walk away, it doesn't need you in the room > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, no hosting, no deploy The deeper version of every step (the contract, the rules, the verifier trick, when to spend on Ultra) is in the article below.

Miraqle

138,163 次观看 • 2 个月前

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

174,412 次观看 • 2 个月前

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD TURN A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE INTO A ONE-SESSION, $12 BUILD. HERE'S EXACTLY HOW. a studio runs this across four people and three weeks. you run it across one chat window and one afternoon. THE BUILD, STAGE BY STAGE: STAGE 1 - THE CONCEPT Claude reads your brief and scripts the scroll before a line of code exists - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. prompt: "read this brief. script the scroll beat by beat, then scaffold the project with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." STAGE 2 - THE VISUALS (Higgsfield) every hero shot, transition, and ambient loop comes out of 30+ generative models - matched to the story, not pulled from a stock library. prompt: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res, cinematic." STAGE 3 - THE MOTION (Claude Code) Claude writes the ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. zero hand-coded keyframes. prompt: "wire the scroll: pin the hero, scrub the video, reveal each section on scroll. keep it 60fps on mobile." STAGE 4 - THE POLISH six cinematic effects baked in, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. prompt: "bake in the cinematic layer, then QA load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - rewrite what doesn't." CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the pipeline was the moat. it just became four prompts. Follow me, comment "MATH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD TURN A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE INTO A ONE-SESSION, $12 BUILD. HERE'S EXACTLY HOW. a studio runs this across four people and three weeks. you run it across one chat window and one afternoon. THE BUILD, STAGE BY STAGE: STAGE 1 - THE CONCEPT Claude reads your brief and scripts the scroll before a line of code exists - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. prompt: "read this brief. script the scroll beat by beat, then scaffold the project with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." STAGE 2 - THE VISUALS (Higgsfield) every hero shot, transition, and ambient loop comes out of 30+ generative models - matched to the story, not pulled from a stock library. prompt: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res, cinematic." STAGE 3 - THE MOTION (Claude Code) Claude writes the ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. zero hand-coded keyframes. prompt: "wire the scroll: pin the hero, scrub the video, reveal each section on scroll. keep it 60fps on mobile." STAGE 4 - THE POLISH six cinematic effects baked in, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. prompt: "bake in the cinematic layer, then QA load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - rewrite what doesn't." CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the pipeline was the moat. it just became four prompts. Follow me, comment "MATH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

47,174 次观看 • 1 个月前

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

57,097 次观看 • 2 个月前

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD BUILD $35K SITES FOR ~$27. BUT EVERYONE HIDES THE 4 THINGS THAT BREAK. HERE THEY ARE - WITH THE FIX. everyone shows the finished build. nobody shows where it breaks on the way there. this is what actually goes wrong, and how to fix each one: → BREAK 1: the clips look generic fix: never prompt "cinematic hero video." give Higgsfield the exact beat - "a slow push through fog as the logo resolves." specificity is the whole game. → BREAK 2: the scroll janks on mobile fix: tell Claude to scrub a compressed video, not full-res, and cap ScrollTrigger to 60fps. Lenis + will-change, never raw scroll listeners. → BREAK 3: it loads like molasses fix: one line - "extract frames, convert to WebP, lazy-load everything below the fold." a heavy hero is what kills these builds. → BREAK 4: the polish reads fake fix: film grain, bloom, vignette at 10-15% - not 100%. subtle reads $35k. cranked reads AI slop. taste is the dial. get those four right and nobody can tell it wasn't a studio. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. the tools ship the site in an hour. these four fixes are what make it look like it took a month. Follow me, reply "BRAKE" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

11,835 次观看 • 1 个月前

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

141,973 次观看 • 2 个月前

MOST PEOPLE WHO BUILD WEBSITES USE CLAUDE CODE THE WRONG WAY A few people train Claude the right way and get the bottom one. The difference is not the model. It is the skills you feed it. Regular Claude without web-design systems produces clean but average product pages. The same Claude, loaded with the right skills, starts delivering sites that look like they cost $5,000. Dark hero. Cinematic pizza shots. Smooth scroll reveals. Menu cards that feel expensive. Zero templates. Those skills are free right now. They live on GitHub. The exact names sit in the article below. One set of prompts. One trained workflow. Suddenly every food brand page you build stops looking like a template and starts looking like money.

Romario

51,349 次观看 • 27 天前

MOST PEOPLE WHO BUILD WEBSITES USE CLAUDE CODE THE WRONG WAY A few people train it properly and get the bottom one. The difference is not the model. It is the skills you feed it. Regular Claude without web-design systems produces clean but average product pages. The same Claude, loaded with the right skills, starts delivering sites that look like they cost $5,000. Those skills are free right now. They live on GitHub. The exact names sit in the article below. One set of prompts. One trained workflow. Suddenly every luxury brand page you build stops looking like a template and starts looking like money.

Romario

295,855 次观看 • 1 个月前

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

80,708 次观看 • 1 个月前

A CHINESE GUY STOPPED PAYING WEB DESIGNERS $1,800 PER LANDING PAGE AND BUILT THE SAME KIND OF SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR LESS THAN $70 claude was not just writing code. it was doing the job of a designer, copywriter and frontend dev in one window. in 4 hours, one rough idea turned into the layout, color system, font choices, page sections and the full html/css/js build the real trick was the references. he gave claude 5 screenshots, made it ask 7 questions first, then pushed it toward one clear visual direction instead of accepting another generic ai-looking template the first version already looked solid. the second pass made it feel expensive: better typography, a darker palette, mobile cleanup, cursor effects, 6 micro-interactions and custom hero visuals his old workflow was burning $1,200 on design, $500 on frontend work and another $150 on small fixes every time he needed a new page. now the whole test costs less than $70 and the site still looks like something a $5,000 agency would ship the edge is not “ai builds websites.” the edge is that one person can now brief, critique, polish and launch in one afternoon without waiting 10 days for a designer to send version one

A CHINESE GUY STOPPED PAYING WEB DESIGNERS $1,800 PER LANDING PAGE AND BUILT THE SAME KIND OF SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR LESS THAN $70 claude was not just writing code. it was doing the job of a designer, copywriter and frontend dev in one window. in 4 hours, one rough idea turned into the layout, color system, font choices, page sections and the full html/css/js build the real trick was the references. he gave claude 5 screenshots, made it ask 7 questions first, then pushed it toward one clear visual direction instead of accepting another generic ai-looking template the first version already looked solid. the second pass made it feel expensive: better typography, a darker palette, mobile cleanup, cursor effects, 6 micro-interactions and custom hero visuals his old workflow was burning $1,200 on design, $500 on frontend work and another $150 on small fixes every time he needed a new page. now the whole test costs less than $70 and the site still looks like something a $5,000 agency would ship the edge is not “ai builds websites.” the edge is that one person can now brief, critique, polish and launch in one afternoon without waiting 10 days for a designer to send version one

Gipp 🦅

304,453 次观看 • 3 个月前

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

21,779 次观看 • 2 个月前

I just built a Claude Code skill that scores whether your landing page actually keeps your Meta ad's promise 🤯 Drop in your ad and the page it points to. It reads both, scores the "ad scent" from click to page, and finds the exact line where the page breaks the promise that won the click. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and media buyers who pour everything into the ad and the CPA but never grade the seam in between. If you're scaling spend on a winning ad, the click is landing on a page that opens with something slightly different, the ad promised 50% off and the page shows full price, the ad hooked "for oily skin" and the page is a generic homepage, and nothing looks broken, but the visitor feels it and bounces... That gap has a name in conversion work: message match. And you already paid for the click you're losing. Here's what it does: → Drop in your ad (headline, copy, offer, CTA) and the landing-page URL → It fetches the live page and reads what's actually above the fold → Grades 7 continuity dimensions: promise, offer, angle, CTA, audience, proof, visual → Shows your ad's words next to your page's words, so every gap is right there → Rewrites your hero headline so the page keeps the ad's promise → Renders a dashboard with a Match Score out of 100 No guessing why the click bounced. No blaming the creative for a page problem. No buying more traffic to fix a copy problem. What you get: → A Match Score on every ad-to-page pair before you scale → The ad-side vs page-side quotes, side by side, for every leak → A hero rewrite you can paste straight onto the page → A dashboard you can hand to your team or client I'm giving away the full skill completely for free. Built 100% in Claude Code. No API keys. Want the skill? > Like this post > Comment "MATCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

I just built a Claude Code skill that scores whether your landing page actually keeps your Meta ad's promise 🤯 Drop in your ad and the page it points to. It reads both, scores the "ad scent" from click to page, and finds the exact line where the page breaks the promise that won the click. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and media buyers who pour everything into the ad and the CPA but never grade the seam in between. If you're scaling spend on a winning ad, the click is landing on a page that opens with something slightly different, the ad promised 50% off and the page shows full price, the ad hooked "for oily skin" and the page is a generic homepage, and nothing looks broken, but the visitor feels it and bounces... That gap has a name in conversion work: message match. And you already paid for the click you're losing. Here's what it does: → Drop in your ad (headline, copy, offer, CTA) and the landing-page URL → It fetches the live page and reads what's actually above the fold → Grades 7 continuity dimensions: promise, offer, angle, CTA, audience, proof, visual → Shows your ad's words next to your page's words, so every gap is right there → Rewrites your hero headline so the page keeps the ad's promise → Renders a dashboard with a Match Score out of 100 No guessing why the click bounced. No blaming the creative for a page problem. No buying more traffic to fix a copy problem. What you get: → A Match Score on every ad-to-page pair before you scale → The ad-side vs page-side quotes, side by side, for every leak → A hero rewrite you can paste straight onto the page → A dashboard you can hand to your team or client I'm giving away the full skill completely for free. Built 100% in Claude Code. No API keys. Want the skill? > Like this post > Comment "MATCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

10,787 次观看 • 1 个月前

Beauty ads just changed forever. Free Claude Opus 4.8 + GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 workflow to spin up 100s of video ads. No studio, no model, no macro lens, no shoot day. Here's what nobody in beauty marketing wants to say out loud. That glossy lip shot. The droplet hitting the surface in slow motion. The whip-pan into the next scene. The crystalline product splash. All the stuff that used to need a real set, a real camera op, and a full shoot day. You can generate every frame of it from a text prompt now, and stitch it into a finished ad before your coffee goes cold. The workflow is almost stupidly simple: → Tell Claude Opus 4.8 the beauty shot you want (dewy skin macro, gloss-on-lips contact, ripple transition, the works) → Claude turns it into a shot-by-shot storyboard plus a prompt for every frame → GPT Image 2 generates the photoreal stills, frame by frame → Seedance 2.0 animates each one into a clip with that buttery slow-mo glide → You drop the clips into HeyOz and assemble the full ad in one place The real unlock is volume. This isn't one hero video. Once the workflow is dialed, you spin up hundreds of variations. Different shades, different models, different hooks, different transitions. The exact creative volume Meta rewards, minus the production cost that used to make it impossible. Old way: one shoot, one look, $10k+, weeks of waiting. New way: a hundred angles, any look, a few dollars each, same afternoon. I wrote up the entire workflow. The Claude storyboard prompt, the GPT Image 2 frame prompts, the Seedance motion settings, the full assembly flow. Completely free, no email gate. Want it? Comment "GLOSS" and I'll send it straight over. (make sure you're following so it can actually reach you)

Beauty ads just changed forever. Free Claude Opus 4.8 + GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 workflow to spin up 100s of video ads. No studio, no model, no macro lens, no shoot day. Here's what nobody in beauty marketing wants to say out loud. That glossy lip shot. The droplet hitting the surface in slow motion. The whip-pan into the next scene. The crystalline product splash. All the stuff that used to need a real set, a real camera op, and a full shoot day. You can generate every frame of it from a text prompt now, and stitch it into a finished ad before your coffee goes cold. The workflow is almost stupidly simple: → Tell Claude Opus 4.8 the beauty shot you want (dewy skin macro, gloss-on-lips contact, ripple transition, the works) → Claude turns it into a shot-by-shot storyboard plus a prompt for every frame → GPT Image 2 generates the photoreal stills, frame by frame → Seedance 2.0 animates each one into a clip with that buttery slow-mo glide → You drop the clips into HeyOz and assemble the full ad in one place The real unlock is volume. This isn't one hero video. Once the workflow is dialed, you spin up hundreds of variations. Different shades, different models, different hooks, different transitions. The exact creative volume Meta rewards, minus the production cost that used to make it impossible. Old way: one shoot, one look, $10k+, weeks of waiting. New way: a hundred angles, any look, a few dollars each, same afternoon. I wrote up the entire workflow. The Claude storyboard prompt, the GPT Image 2 frame prompts, the Seedance motion settings, the full assembly flow. Completely free, no email gate. Want it? Comment "GLOSS" and I'll send it straight over. (make sure you're following so it can actually reach you)

Ahad Shams

11,259 次观看 • 3 个月前

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

480,444 次观看 • 2 个月前

this is f**king dangerous Most people treat Claude like a search bar. The ones with a second brain treat it as an intelligence layer on everything they know. Here's the 15-minute setup: → Install Claude Code → Install Obsidian, create a vault → Open it in Claude Code, drop in the CLAUDE.md schema — that one file is the engine → Throw any source in, say "ingest this" Done. From then on, everything you know is queryable by the most capable AI on earth. Claude wires each source against your whole vault and surfaces connections you forgot you had. Build it tonight. full A–Z guide below.

this is f**king dangerous Most people treat Claude like a search bar. The ones with a second brain treat it as an intelligence layer on everything they know. Here's the 15-minute setup: → Install Claude Code → Install Obsidian, create a vault → Open it in Claude Code, drop in the CLAUDE.md schema — that one file is the engine → Throw any source in, say "ingest this" Done. From then on, everything you know is queryable by the most capable AI on earth. Claude wires each source against your whole vault and surfaces connections you forgot you had. Build it tonight. full A–Z guide below.

Kirill

19,358 次观看 • 1 个月前

WHEN FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD FINISH A $35K SITE, HERE'S EVERYTHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE FOLDER. no mockups, no "phase 2 next week." this is what ships - ready to hand a client: → the live site a scroll-driven build - GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, pinned sections, scrubbed video, zero hand-coded keyframes. → the footage (yours to keep) a hero clip + one b-roll per section, generated in Higgsfield from 30+ models. not licensed stock - owned outright. → the optimized assets frames extracted, converted to WebP, lazy-loaded. loads instant, even on mobile. → the cinematic layer film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no plugins, no designer. → copy + responsive layout section copy drafted, breakpoints handled, mobile-tuned. that's the full studio deliverable. minus the studio, minus the month, minus the invoice. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session agencies sold you the folder. they just took a month and $35k to fill it. Follow me, reply "FOLDER" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

WHEN FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD FINISH A $35K SITE, HERE'S EVERYTHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE FOLDER. no mockups, no "phase 2 next week." this is what ships - ready to hand a client: → the live site a scroll-driven build - GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, pinned sections, scrubbed video, zero hand-coded keyframes. → the footage (yours to keep) a hero clip + one b-roll per section, generated in Higgsfield from 30+ models. not licensed stock - owned outright. → the optimized assets frames extracted, converted to WebP, lazy-loaded. loads instant, even on mobile. → the cinematic layer film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no plugins, no designer. → copy + responsive layout section copy drafted, breakpoints handled, mobile-tuned. that's the full studio deliverable. minus the studio, minus the month, minus the invoice. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session agencies sold you the folder. they just took a month and $35k to fill it. Follow me, reply "FOLDER" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

20,996 次观看 • 1 个月前

If your website looks like everyone else's, it's working against you. Most sites today are the same. Same layout, same sections, same stock photos. And when everything looks the same, nothing stands out, including yours. The sites that actually do the job now have a point of view. They tell a story, guide you through it, make you want to keep scrolling. Branding, motion, interaction, the details that make someone feel something instead of just reading text. Take a look at this one. Not saying every site needs to be this. But if your goal is to impress, convert, or be remembered, flat and generic won't get you there anymore.

If your website looks like everyone else's, it's working against you. Most sites today are the same. Same layout, same sections, same stock photos. And when everything looks the same, nothing stands out, including yours. The sites that actually do the job now have a point of view. They tell a story, guide you through it, make you want to keep scrolling. Branding, motion, interaction, the details that make someone feel something instead of just reading text. Take a look at this one. Not saying every site needs to be this. But if your goal is to impress, convert, or be remembered, flat and generic won't get you there anymore.

Adam 🌿 Unroot.design

20,276 次观看 • 4 个月前

I still don't understand why everyone is not using this yet. Thanks to it, a year ago I increased my income to 17,000 dollars a month Andrey Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, published a simple idea that got 16 million views: stop using AI to write code, use it to build a second brain You point Claude Code to a folder, drop any source in there (an article, transcript, PDF) and Claude reads it, links it, and saves it into a living wiki of everything you know. It compounds like interest: the more you feed it, the smarter it gets Here is the gist: Install Obsidian, create a vault, open it in Claude Code Paste the file with Karpathy's wiki idea and tell Claude to build it Claude creates three folders: raw for sources, wiki for its pages, CLAUDE which runs everything Drop any source into raw and say "ingest this" Ask questions across everything, forever Five minutes to set up, and you never start with an empty chat again The full step-by-step guide is in the article. Save to bookmarks

I still don't understand why everyone is not using this yet. Thanks to it, a year ago I increased my income to 17,000 dollars a month Andrey Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, published a simple idea that got 16 million views: stop using AI to write code, use it to build a second brain You point Claude Code to a folder, drop any source in there (an article, transcript, PDF) and Claude reads it, links it, and saves it into a living wiki of everything you know. It compounds like interest: the more you feed it, the smarter it gets Here is the gist: Install Obsidian, create a vault, open it in Claude Code Paste the file with Karpathy's wiki idea and tell Claude to build it Claude creates three folders: raw for sources, wiki for its pages, CLAUDE which runs everything Drop any source into raw and say "ingest this" Ask questions across everything, forever Five minutes to set up, and you never start with an empty chat again The full step-by-step guide is in the article. Save to bookmarks

Bober_smart

2,822,387 次观看 • 21 天前

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

567,710 次观看 • 2 个月前

this is more useful than my entire degree Elon Musk's rocket company signed a $60,000,000,000 deal for Cursor in June, and eight days ago the two of them put a worker on sale for $200 a month: it gets its own computer in the cloud, signs into your accounts, clicks through your real apps, and hands back finished work instead of a draft for you to paste i ran one against my receipts folder on sunday and got back 14 filed, 2 it held because they needed a card number, and a saved method i never wrote myself Grok Bot is the one you train by doing your own job in front of it, and the whole handover fits in four messages tonight: 1. write out one job you did today the way you would brief a new hire: what has to be finished, which sites and files to work from, what to hand back, and where it stops and asks you 2. let it run once on something safe to get wrong, then correct the result until it is worth your name 3. say "save what we just did as a skill", and add the one rule about what always needs your approval 4. say "run that skill every weekday at 8 and post the result here. if the source is missing, tell me instead of using yesterday's numbers" xAI wrote that order into its own manual: one real job, then the saved method, then the clock. a schedule sitting on top of a method nobody checked replaces two hours of your clicking with two hours of your mistake turns out you never get to pick the brain, and that is the part i would argue about: the manual says there is no model picker for members or admins, no plan to add one, and the bill follows whichever model answered bookmark this, then open the piece below: which jobs deserve a worker of their own, and which ones quietly burn the seat ↓

this is more useful than my entire degree Elon Musk's rocket company signed a $60,000,000,000 deal for Cursor in June, and eight days ago the two of them put a worker on sale for $200 a month: it gets its own computer in the cloud, signs into your accounts, clicks through your real apps, and hands back finished work instead of a draft for you to paste i ran one against my receipts folder on sunday and got back 14 filed, 2 it held because they needed a card number, and a saved method i never wrote myself Grok Bot is the one you train by doing your own job in front of it, and the whole handover fits in four messages tonight: 1. write out one job you did today the way you would brief a new hire: what has to be finished, which sites and files to work from, what to hand back, and where it stops and asks you 2. let it run once on something safe to get wrong, then correct the result until it is worth your name 3. say "save what we just did as a skill", and add the one rule about what always needs your approval 4. say "run that skill every weekday at 8 and post the result here. if the source is missing, tell me instead of using yesterday's numbers" xAI wrote that order into its own manual: one real job, then the saved method, then the clock. a schedule sitting on top of a method nobody checked replaces two hours of your clicking with two hours of your mistake turns out you never get to pick the brain, and that is the part i would argue about: the manual says there is no model picker for members or admins, no plan to add one, and the bill follows whichever model answered bookmark this, then open the piece below: which jobs deserve a worker of their own, and which ones quietly burn the seat ↓

Argona

21,946 次观看 • 23 天前