Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Grok PROMPT: Build a production-ready 3D flight visualizer in one HTML file. Use Three.js to render a rotatable Earth and simulate real-time aircraft positions using smooth interpolation. Include polished lighting, a starfield background, and make it responsive for mobile and desktop. Which tool...

olegtalk's profile picture

Oleg Bilozor

1,957 subscribers

72,608 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a fully functional 3D Rubik's Cube simulation using Three.js (via CDN). The cube must be able to automatically solve itself.
0:13

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a fully functional 3D Rubik's Cube simulation using Three.js (via CDN). The cube must be able to automatically solve itself.

Alex Prompter

14,891 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 opus is consistent and relaible Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better
0:12

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 opus is consistent and relaible Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better

Chetaslua

37,519 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Gemini 3 Pro (left) vs ChatGPT 5.1 thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 (right) Prompt: Multi-ball heptagon physics Write html, css, and javascript to display 20 balls bouncing inside a spinning heptagon. each ball should have a unique color, a number label, gravity, and collision detection with the walls. all code in one file.
0:14

Gemini 3 Pro (left) vs ChatGPT 5.1 thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 (right) Prompt: Multi-ball heptagon physics Write html, css, and javascript to display 20 balls bouncing inside a spinning heptagon. each ball should have a unique color, a number label, gravity, and collision detection with the walls. all code in one file.

God of Prompt

105,823 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?
0:16

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

24,968 просмотров • 24 дней назад

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.
0:13

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.

God of Prompt

96,685 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?
0:14

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

Bhavy☄️

110,316 просмотров • 26 дней назад

GPT 5.2 vs. Gemini 3 Pro Kimi 2.5 vs. Opus 4.6 Prompt I used: "Build a first-person downhill skiing simulation in a single HTML file. The 'skier' must automatically accelerate to 93 mph within 10 seconds. As the speed increases, the edges of the screen must 'blur' and the camera must vibrate realistically to simulate the extreme speed of an Olympic run."
0:15

GPT 5.2 vs. Gemini 3 Pro Kimi 2.5 vs. Opus 4.6 Prompt I used: "Build a first-person downhill skiing simulation in a single HTML file. The 'skier' must automatically accelerate to 93 mph within 10 seconds. As the speed increases, the edges of the screen must 'blur' and the camera must vibrate realistically to simulate the extreme speed of an Olympic run."

Alex Prompter

79,656 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.
0:15

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.

Dev Ed

279,565 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

How I built with Claude 👇 Prompt: "Design an agency site where services are presented as supermarket product packaging in 3D" Use Three.js with WebGL to render all products in real time in the browser Use Blender to model the packaging then export as GLTF to load in Three.js Use GSAP for the smooth product rotation and hover interactions Save this if you want a portfolio that makes clients feel they are buying something premium 🛒
0:14

How I built with Claude 👇 Prompt: "Design an agency site where services are presented as supermarket product packaging in 3D" Use Three.js with WebGL to render all products in real time in the browser Use Blender to model the packaging then export as GLTF to load in Three.js Use GSAP for the smooth product rotation and hover interactions Save this if you want a portfolio that makes clients feel they are buying something premium 🛒

FHILY👑

76,325 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Turned a single photo into a cinematic 4K skincare ad—all from my phone. 🤯 Made with Pollo AI mobile app using Seedance 2.0 4K—just one image, one prompt, and it delivered smooth cinematic shots, premium lighting, and a production-ready look. Now your phone is all the studio and team you need. Check out the tutorial below ⬇️
0:15

Turned a single photo into a cinematic 4K skincare ad—all from my phone. 🤯 Made with Pollo AI mobile app using Seedance 2.0 4K—just one image, one prompt, and it delivered smooth cinematic shots, premium lighting, and a production-ready look. Now your phone is all the studio and team you need. Check out the tutorial below ⬇️

Sophie Ai

35,700 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I created this using Claude + 3D animation: 1. Ask Claude for a scroll-based cinematic animation pla 2. Generate prompts for depth, parallax, and camera movement 3. Install Three.js + GSAP + ScrollTrigger 4. Use scroll to control zoom, scale, and scene transitions 5. Add layered images for 3D depth illusion 6. Apply smooth easing, lighting, and shadows for realism 7. Refine until it feels like one continuous scene Save this
0:16

I created this using Claude + 3D animation: 1. Ask Claude for a scroll-based cinematic animation pla 2. Generate prompts for depth, parallax, and camera movement 3. Install Three.js + GSAP + ScrollTrigger 4. Use scroll to control zoom, scale, and scene transitions 5. Add layered images for 3D depth illusion 6. Apply smooth easing, lighting, and shadows for realism 7. Refine until it feels like one continuous scene Save this

FHILY👑

395,598 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Gemini (left) vs ChatGPT vs Claude (right) Prompt: Create an interactive HTML, CSS, and JavaScript simulation of a satellite system that transmits signals to ground receivers. The simulation should show a satellite orbiting the Earth and periodically sending signals that are received by multiple ground stations. Include realistic factors such as signal delay based on distance, occasional signal loss due to obstructions or interference, and visualization of the signal path as lines or waves. The satellites’ position should be updated using simplified orbital mechanics, and the ground receivers should display received signal strength and timestamps.
0:18

Gemini (left) vs ChatGPT vs Claude (right) Prompt: Create an interactive HTML, CSS, and JavaScript simulation of a satellite system that transmits signals to ground receivers. The simulation should show a satellite orbiting the Earth and periodically sending signals that are received by multiple ground stations. Include realistic factors such as signal delay based on distance, occasional signal loss due to obstructions or interference, and visualization of the signal path as lines or waves. The satellites’ position should be updated using simplified orbital mechanics, and the ground receivers should display received signal strength and timestamps.

Alex Prompter

230,015 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Look at the difference the tool AND the prompt make. Bad generator + lazy prompt: stiff movement, dead eyes, that obvious "AI look" everyone scrolls past. Seedance + a detailed, structured prompt: natural movement, real lighting, real pacing — looks like it came off an actual production shoot. Same product photo. Completely different result. It's not one or the other. You need the right tool AND the right prompt to get agency-level output. Ready to see the exact setup? Check the comments 👇
0:15

Look at the difference the tool AND the prompt make. Bad generator + lazy prompt: stiff movement, dead eyes, that obvious "AI look" everyone scrolls past. Seedance + a detailed, structured prompt: natural movement, real lighting, real pacing — looks like it came off an actual production shoot. Same product photo. Completely different result. It's not one or the other. You need the right tool AND the right prompt to get agency-level output. Ready to see the exact setup? Check the comments 👇

Stijn Feijen

11,933 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?
0:15

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

Lumina

72,529 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 FREE AI CODING MODEL ALERT! Tencent Hy's latest model, HY3, is now FREE in Kilo Code for a limited time. Here are the one-shot results when we prompted Opus, Fable, and HY3 to "Create a 3D HTML visualizer of Earth spinning in space" in Kilo's Agent Manager:
0:15

🚨 FREE AI CODING MODEL ALERT! Tencent Hy's latest model, HY3, is now FREE in Kilo Code for a limited time. Here are the one-shot results when we prompted Opus, Fable, and HY3 to "Create a 3D HTML visualizer of Earth spinning in space" in Kilo's Agent Manager:

Kilo (acq. by Anaconda)

79,964 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

HTML enters 3D! Or vice versa? With the new HTML in Canvas by WICG, we can finally put native DOM elements directly into WebGL/WebGPU scenes. It is experimental for now, but the possibilities for 3D interfaces and special effects are huge. This demo was built using Three.js and Omma AI (tool by Spline ) It’s a fun new way to explore what the web can do! Are you interested in seeing the demo?
0:10

HTML enters 3D! Or vice versa? With the new HTML in Canvas by WICG, we can finally put native DOM elements directly into WebGL/WebGPU scenes. It is experimental for now, but the possibilities for 3D interfaces and special effects are huge. This demo was built using Three.js and Omma AI (tool by Spline ) It’s a fun new way to explore what the web can do! Are you interested in seeing the demo?

Gábor Pribék

176,535 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

GROK 4.20 JUST SMOKED GPT‑5, CLAUDE, AND GEMINI It beat GPT-5, Gemini 3, and Claude in forecasting real-world events. Only actual humans who do this for a living are ahead of it. And Elon says the best parts of Grok 4.20 aren’t even online yet. This version isn’t even finished training. Just imagine what Grok 5 will be able to do!
0:10

GROK 4.20 JUST SMOKED GPT‑5, CLAUDE, AND GEMINI It beat GPT-5, Gemini 3, and Claude in forecasting real-world events. Only actual humans who do this for a living are ahead of it. And Elon says the best parts of Grok 4.20 aren’t even online yet. This version isn’t even finished training. Just imagine what Grok 5 will be able to do!

Mario Nawfal

966,130 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

There are way too many AI 3D models claiming to be the best. So we’re testing them head-to-head. Tripo P1 vs Meshy V6 vs Hunyuan V3.1 Pro vs Rodin 2.5 Same image. Same prompt. No cherry-picking, only 1 generation. This week’s test: a shiny metal helmet. reflections, materials, geometry, and texture accuracy. Next up: characters, objects, environments, and more. By the end, we want one answer: Which AI 3D model should you actually use for your next game, website, or project?
0:12

There are way too many AI 3D models claiming to be the best. So we’re testing them head-to-head. Tripo P1 vs Meshy V6 vs Hunyuan V3.1 Pro vs Rodin 2.5 Same image. Same prompt. No cherry-picking, only 1 generation. This week’s test: a shiny metal helmet. reflections, materials, geometry, and texture accuracy. Next up: characters, objects, environments, and more. By the end, we want one answer: Which AI 3D model should you actually use for your next game, website, or project?

mint

20,963 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Sakura vs Jinx, created with the AI Seedance 2.0. Artificial intelligence is evolving at an impressive speed. It is already capable of generating a fight between a 2D character and a 3D character in a way that feels natural and believable. What is even more surprising is that this can be created in just a few minutes with a single prompt. Something that previously required a large team, significant resources, and a long production time can now be generated with just one well-crafted prompt.
0:15

Sakura vs Jinx, created with the AI Seedance 2.0. Artificial intelligence is evolving at an impressive speed. It is already capable of generating a fight between a 2D character and a 3D character in a way that feels natural and believable. What is even more surprising is that this can be created in just a few minutes with a single prompt. Something that previously required a large team, significant resources, and a long production time can now be generated with just one well-crafted prompt.

nachos2d

240,509 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад