Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Clavicular explains why he thinks talking at bars is pointless and says it’s better to get straight to the point “I see people having these conversations back and forth at a bar and it’ll be like an interview process where the guy’s just asking all these stupid questions” “But... show more

Mikli

19,765 subscribers

64,389 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Clavicular reveals his game is just walking up and asking girls if they want to have sex "I see people having these conversations back and forth at a bar. It'll be like an interview process, the guy is just asking all these stupid questions" "After all that's said and done, after that five or ten minutes, is that going to change the answer to the key question of is this girl sexually attracted to me? The answer is no" "I just like to skip straight to the point and just ask if a girl wants to have sex"

Sensitive content

Clavicular reveals his game is just walking up and asking girls if they want to have sex "I see people having these conversations back and forth at a bar. It'll be like an interview process, the guy is just asking all these stupid questions" "After all that's said and done, after that five or ten minutes, is that going to change the answer to the key question of is this girl sexually attracted to me? The answer is no" "I just like to skip straight to the point and just ask if a girl wants to have sex"

Casper

89,807 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

MrBeast reveals he secretly planted hidden GoPros inside Walmarts across America to figure out why his chocolate bars kept breaking "I paid people to put GoPros in like a bag of lace chips pointed at because I couldn't get I tried to get Walmart to give me the security camera footage and they wouldn't so I put hidden GoPros in a bunch of random Walmarts just to point it at the Feastable bars just to see why are they f***ing breaking so much" "There's so many shots of like you know like a mom grabbing a bar and then she'd be looking at literally like this and then you just see the box just go and she and it just fall off the shelf and then they just put it up and you know some of the bars would be broken and it would just happen over and over and over again because we didn't engineer the boxes correctly" "Do you know how atypical that is what you've just said that you put GoPros yeah people told me I was crazy the amount of people who tried to tell me that was illegal I was like bro I don't f***ing care I just need to know why my bars are breaking"

MrBeast reveals he secretly planted hidden GoPros inside Walmarts across America to figure out why his chocolate bars kept breaking "I paid people to put GoPros in like a bag of lace chips pointed at because I couldn't get I tried to get Walmart to give me the security camera footage and they wouldn't so I put hidden GoPros in a bunch of random Walmarts just to point it at the Feastable bars just to see why are they fing breaking so much" "There's so many shots of like you know like a mom grabbing a bar and then she'd be looking at literally like this and then you just see the box just go and she and it just fall off the shelf and then they just put it up and you know some of the bars would be broken and it would just happen over and over and over again because we didn't engineer the boxes correctly" "Do you know how atypical that is what you've just said that you put GoPros yeah people told me I was crazy the amount of people who tried to tell me that was illegal I was like bro I don't fing care I just need to know why my bars are breaking"

Kenzo

11,321,106 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

39,177 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Engineers and salespeople think in completely different ways. - Engineers: "If you ask them a question, a hundred percent of them will try and think of what is the correct answer to that question." - Salespeople: "If you're a salesperson, your first thought isn't: what's the answer? It's: why are you asking me that question?" "And so if you have an engineer talking to a good sales guy, it's going to upset them. Because they're often not gonna answer the question." "The guys who are good at the job get rejected, because you don't like them. And then the people who are terrible at it, those are the ones that ended up getting hired." "These CEOs just wanna take a guy who failed the engineering test, put a clean shirt on him and make him the head of sales." benahorowitz.eth with Brian Halligan

Engineers and salespeople think in completely different ways. - Engineers: "If you ask them a question, a hundred percent of them will try and think of what is the correct answer to that question." - Salespeople: "If you're a salesperson, your first thought isn't: what's the answer? It's: why are you asking me that question?" "And so if you have an engineer talking to a good sales guy, it's going to upset them. Because they're often not gonna answer the question." "The guys who are good at the job get rejected, because you don't like them. And then the people who are terrible at it, those are the ones that ended up getting hired." "These CEOs just wanna take a guy who failed the engineering test, put a clean shirt on him and make him the head of sales." benahorowitz.eth with Brian Halligan

a16z

173,237 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

One of the biggest criticisms of #Jets QB target Ty Simpson is his 15 career college starts. Coach Mitch Dahlen, who worked with Simpson the last 2 years at Alabama, pushed back on that storyline & explained to me why there’s a ‘big asterisk’ on that: “Obviously, numbers speak for themselves. It’s easy to say that, but then you get around the kid and talk to the kid, and you’re like, okay. That’s why I think he is going to be a first-rounder, with all of these interviews and he is with all of these #NFL execs and all these people, and you get the kid on the board and the kid is talking football, and then you’re like ‘Yeah, I’m good,'” coach Dahlen told me on the podcast. “I know he’s had 15 [career starts], but he operates like he is at 55 [career starts]. You know what I mean? To me, that is our job as coaches, to get him to a point where, regardless of how many startsthey have, if they’re able to master a system like that and talk through just football, I mean, someone is going to take that opportunity to take Ty just off that alone. That 15 has a big asterisk on it because he has been around football his whole life,” coach Dahlen emphatically said. 🎥 Boy Green Daily #JetUp #RollTide FULL INTERVIEW:

One of the biggest criticisms of #Jets QB target Ty Simpson is his 15 career college starts. Coach Mitch Dahlen, who worked with Simpson the last 2 years at Alabama, pushed back on that storyline & explained to me why there’s a ‘big asterisk’ on that: “Obviously, numbers speak for themselves. It’s easy to say that, but then you get around the kid and talk to the kid, and you’re like, okay. That’s why I think he is going to be a first-rounder, with all of these interviews and he is with all of these #NFL execs and all these people, and you get the kid on the board and the kid is talking football, and then you’re like ‘Yeah, I’m good,'” coach Dahlen told me on the podcast. “I know he’s had 15 [career starts], but he operates like he is at 55 [career starts]. You know what I mean? To me, that is our job as coaches, to get him to a point where, regardless of how many startsthey have, if they’re able to master a system like that and talk through just football, I mean, someone is going to take that opportunity to take Ty just off that alone. That 15 has a big asterisk on it because he has been around football his whole life,” coach Dahlen emphatically said. 🎥 Boy Green Daily #JetUp #RollTide FULL INTERVIEW:

Paul Andrew Esden Jr

11,391 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"Is Stretch really that innovative Bitcoin-backed credit, or is it just yield chasing right now?" David Duong on the real debate around Michael Saylor and Strategy "So far Saylor has demonstrated the ability to raise capital and grow his Bitcoin per share. That kind of stays ahead of the compounding dividend obligation he has. That engine so far has been running" "But is that an autopilot thing where he can just keep doing that in perpetuity? I don't have the answer to that. I don't think anyone does" "A lot of it comes down to Michael Saylor. How good is he at continuing this trend? I don't know what the answer is gonna be at the end of all things, but this is what a lot of people are internalizing at the moment"

"Is Stretch really that innovative Bitcoin-backed credit, or is it just yield chasing right now?" David Duong on the real debate around Michael Saylor and Strategy "So far Saylor has demonstrated the ability to raise capital and grow his Bitcoin per share. That kind of stays ahead of the compounding dividend obligation he has. That engine so far has been running" "But is that an autopilot thing where he can just keep doing that in perpetuity? I don't have the answer to that. I don't think anyone does" "A lot of it comes down to Michael Saylor. How good is he at continuing this trend? I don't know what the answer is gonna be at the end of all things, but this is what a lot of people are internalizing at the moment"

The Wolf Of All Streets

16,229 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Naval Ravikant explains why "the meaning of life" is the wrong question: "It's a 'why' question. You can keep asking 'why' forever. Any answer I give you, you just ask 'why' again." Naval explains where every "why" question ends: "There's a thing called Agrippa's Trilemma. It says that any questioning like this will always end in one of three places. First is infinite regress: 'why?' 'because of this,' 'why?' and you just keep playing it. Second is circular reasoning: 'why A?' 'because of B,' 'why B?' 'because of A.' Third is an axiom. The most popular axiom is God. But it could be anything: math, science, the Big Bang, the simulation. These are all just stopping points. Saying 'we're in a simulation' or 'it's the Big Bang' is just another way of saying God. It's just that God's a dirty word now." He shares what this means: "So there is no answer. The real answer is 'because.' You get to make up your own answers. The beauty is, if there was a single answer, we would not be free. We would be trapped. We'd be Borg-like robots competing with each other to fulfill that single meaning. But luckily there is no answer. So you just do whatever you want." Naval addresses the fear of being insignificant: "All the great questions are paradoxes. You're asking, 'Do I matter?' On one hand, you're completely separate. No one will have your thoughts, your emotions, your experience. Your life is a single-player game. You're trapped inside your head. On the other hand, I cannot say the words 'Joe Rogan' without invoking the entire universe. What's Joe Rogan? A human. What's a human? A bipedal ape. What's an ape? On earth. What's earth? A planet. Where was the carbon made? Inside stars. I have to create the entire universe just to say the words 'Joe Rogan.'" He concludes: "So the answer to 'Do I matter?' is: I am nothing and I am everything. The answers to all great questions are paradoxes. It's pointless to pursue them for a trite answer, but the act of pursuing them brings a level of peace."

Naval Ravikant explains why "the meaning of life" is the wrong question: "It's a 'why' question. You can keep asking 'why' forever. Any answer I give you, you just ask 'why' again." Naval explains where every "why" question ends: "There's a thing called Agrippa's Trilemma. It says that any questioning like this will always end in one of three places. First is infinite regress: 'why?' 'because of this,' 'why?' and you just keep playing it. Second is circular reasoning: 'why A?' 'because of B,' 'why B?' 'because of A.' Third is an axiom. The most popular axiom is God. But it could be anything: math, science, the Big Bang, the simulation. These are all just stopping points. Saying 'we're in a simulation' or 'it's the Big Bang' is just another way of saying God. It's just that God's a dirty word now." He shares what this means: "So there is no answer. The real answer is 'because.' You get to make up your own answers. The beauty is, if there was a single answer, we would not be free. We would be trapped. We'd be Borg-like robots competing with each other to fulfill that single meaning. But luckily there is no answer. So you just do whatever you want." Naval addresses the fear of being insignificant: "All the great questions are paradoxes. You're asking, 'Do I matter?' On one hand, you're completely separate. No one will have your thoughts, your emotions, your experience. Your life is a single-player game. You're trapped inside your head. On the other hand, I cannot say the words 'Joe Rogan' without invoking the entire universe. What's Joe Rogan? A human. What's a human? A bipedal ape. What's an ape? On earth. What's earth? A planet. Where was the carbon made? Inside stars. I have to create the entire universe just to say the words 'Joe Rogan.'" He concludes: "So the answer to 'Do I matter?' is: I am nothing and I am everything. The answers to all great questions are paradoxes. It's pointless to pursue them for a trite answer, but the act of pursuing them brings a level of peace."

Jaynit

155,482 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jake Paul says YouTuber disease is real "When you create something and you get validation back for it and people like it, that feels really good as an artistic creative person" "Then there is a certain point where you’ve done it all, talked about everything, and showed the audience my life, and whatever it might be for each YouTuber" "But then there’s a point where the views start to go back down, it’s just a natural progression, it’s happening to MrBeast currently" "Then it’s what can I do to get that feeling back to continue to grow these views. That’s when I think creatively you lose a sense of yourself and you start to do things that aren’t authentic to who you are"

Jake Paul says YouTuber disease is real "When you create something and you get validation back for it and people like it, that feels really good as an artistic creative person" "Then there is a certain point where you’ve done it all, talked about everything, and showed the audience my life, and whatever it might be for each YouTuber" "But then there’s a point where the views start to go back down, it’s just a natural progression, it’s happening to MrBeast currently" "Then it’s what can I do to get that feeling back to continue to grow these views. That’s when I think creatively you lose a sense of yourself and you start to do things that aren’t authentic to who you are"

dank

69,316 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Here Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 tries numerous times to get Rupert Lowe MP to say something critical about BlackRock and ask how Restore would combat the scourge of foreign big money interests. Time and time again Rupert ducks the question and rambles off a bunch of Tory talking points. He even hilariously starts talking about Austrian School Economics at one point just to really ram the point home that he won’t lift a finger to combat BlackRock. You can see Carl try again and again to interrupt and get a straight answer but none is forthcoming. I think you see Carl realise in real time Rupert doesn’t get it and is not the guy we need to lead us.

Here Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 tries numerous times to get Rupert Lowe MP to say something critical about BlackRock and ask how Restore would combat the scourge of foreign big money interests. Time and time again Rupert ducks the question and rambles off a bunch of Tory talking points. He even hilariously starts talking about Austrian School Economics at one point just to really ram the point home that he won’t lift a finger to combat BlackRock. You can see Carl try again and again to interrupt and get a straight answer but none is forthcoming. I think you see Carl realise in real time Rupert doesn’t get it and is not the guy we need to lead us.

Wolf 🐺

19,599 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Ronda Rousey explains her real issue with Hunter Campbell: "He was being so dismissive and just trying to get me and Gina to value ourselves less from the get-go. He was like, 'Oh, I know, you guys are just so much older and I just don't know how it's gonna do.' It just really rubbed me the wrong way that like this fucking guy is the person that's going to be shepherding the company that I helped build. My mom is part of the California Athletic Commission and she had a meeting with him about trying to get Slap allowed for California. He goes, this is a really big opportunity for a lot of these people. A lot of these guys would just be doing meth in a trailer park if it wasn't for this... We are glorified bum fights to this guy."

Ronda Rousey explains her real issue with Hunter Campbell: "He was being so dismissive and just trying to get me and Gina to value ourselves less from the get-go. He was like, 'Oh, I know, you guys are just so much older and I just don't know how it's gonna do.' It just really rubbed me the wrong way that like this fucking guy is the person that's going to be shepherding the company that I helped build. My mom is part of the California Athletic Commission and she had a meeting with him about trying to get Slap allowed for California. He goes, this is a really big opportunity for a lot of these people. A lot of these guys would just be doing meth in a trailer park if it wasn't for this... We are glorified bum fights to this guy."

Ariel Helwani

109,315 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Variational's Lucas Schuermann says the reason to keep asking what the endgame is comes down to the effort it takes to be a founder: "I ask myself this question a lot. And the reason to ask it a lot is, I think, to really put in the effort that it takes to be a founder. And not just for me, but for the rest of our team of 25." "We have to have a vision and an endgame and a reason why we wake up every day and grind on this." "One is on the product side. It's democratizing access. I think that traders globally should be able to trade global markets, without red tape, without restrictions and taxes and fees and onboarding that are so ridiculously fragmenting." "But more broadly, I like building things that people use." "The idea of introducing new technology and seeing it become used, and at this point even seeing it be copied. It's really fulfilling." "For a lot of entrepreneurs, it's really that idea of building something and seeing it be used, and that you feel pride about." lucas.var Variational MR SHIFT 🦁

Variational's Lucas Schuermann says the reason to keep asking what the endgame is comes down to the effort it takes to be a founder: "I ask myself this question a lot. And the reason to ask it a lot is, I think, to really put in the effort that it takes to be a founder. And not just for me, but for the rest of our team of 25." "We have to have a vision and an endgame and a reason why we wake up every day and grind on this." "One is on the product side. It's democratizing access. I think that traders globally should be able to trade global markets, without red tape, without restrictions and taxes and fees and onboarding that are so ridiculously fragmenting." "But more broadly, I like building things that people use." "The idea of introducing new technology and seeing it become used, and at this point even seeing it be copied. It's really fulfilling." "For a lot of entrepreneurs, it's really that idea of building something and seeing it be used, and that you feel pride about." lucas.var Variational MR SHIFT 🦁

Dragonfly ＞|＜

33,462 просмотров • 7 дней назад

“This is what annoys me... Dana’s doing interviews with UK outlets, and they’re telling them the questions they’re allowed to ask. They’re asking to see the interview before it even goes out. I’m listening to these guys asking questions, and no one’s pushing him. No one’s really asking any serious questions. No one really asks any proper questions. It’s a huge machine that you can’t actually get close to and ask the real questions. If I’m on media row, I’m asking a question: if Tom Aspinall is driving more revenue to the pot than Conor Benn, why is he making 10 times less money? Can you answer that?” Eddie Hearn on TKO's attempts to control the media.

“This is what annoys me... Dana’s doing interviews with UK outlets, and they’re telling them the questions they’re allowed to ask. They’re asking to see the interview before it even goes out. I’m listening to these guys asking questions, and no one’s pushing him. No one’s really asking any serious questions. No one really asks any proper questions. It’s a huge machine that you can’t actually get close to and ask the real questions. If I’m on media row, I’m asking a question: if Tom Aspinall is driving more revenue to the pot than Conor Benn, why is he making 10 times less money? Can you answer that?” Eddie Hearn on TKO's attempts to control the media.

Ariel Helwani

359,052 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

👤 why is your nickname ‘safari’? 🐰 there are a lot of animals i resemble and fans get really upset when only one of them is pushed like “ah i’m team cat” “ah i’m team puppy” and it’s gotten to the point where there are even mentions of animals like guinea pigs and other animals they like…so it’s hard picking just one and to say that all of them work, (i chose ‘safari’)! 👤 are there any in particular you want? 🐰 ever since i was a student, my family’s called me “puppy” and i thought i looked like a dog but after debuting, all these animals got added to the list so i’m good with everything they want me to be!

👤 why is your nickname ‘safari’? 🐰 there are a lot of animals i resemble and fans get really upset when only one of them is pushed like “ah i’m team cat” “ah i’m team puppy” and it’s gotten to the point where there are even mentions of animals like guinea pigs and other animals they like…so it’s hard picking just one and to say that all of them work, (i chose ‘safari’)! 👤 are there any in particular you want? 🐰 ever since i was a student, my family’s called me “puppy” and i thought i looked like a dog but after debuting, all these animals got added to the list so i’m good with everything they want me to be!

💬

65,017 просмотров • 28 дней назад

He is absolutely SMASHING their narratives in real time. Vice President Vance immediately pushes back hard after Joy Behar claimed President Trump called affordability a “hoax”. BEHAR: “President trump has called affordability a hoax. He said that, not me...” “He is pouring money into this ballroom and the reflecting pool, the arch de Trumpe, I call it, and a White house Cage match. All these things.” “Why is he doing them when you just...everybody knows that Americans are struggling. What is he spending all of this money for?” VANCE: “Well, I’ve got to defend the president on the hoax point.” “What the president said is the idea that Republicans caused the affordability problem is a hoax.” “And I think that’s true.” “If you go back to the Biden administration, inflation got up to 9% inflation.” “Right now it’s at 3.5%. By the way, too high. We’re doing everything we can to bring it back down to 2.5%, where most people would like to see it.” “But we inherited an affordability problem.” “We’re doing a lot to make it better.” “It’s going to take a little more time. There’s a lot more work to do.” “But the president knows a lot of Americans are struggling. He ran on that. He talked about it.” “And we’ve done some things and made some good progress on that point.”

He is absolutely SMASHING their narratives in real time. Vice President Vance immediately pushes back hard after Joy Behar claimed President Trump called affordability a “hoax”. BEHAR: “President trump has called affordability a hoax. He said that, not me...” “He is pouring money into this ballroom and the reflecting pool, the arch de Trumpe, I call it, and a White house Cage match. All these things.” “Why is he doing them when you just...everybody knows that Americans are struggling. What is he spending all of this money for?” VANCE: “Well, I’ve got to defend the president on the hoax point.” “What the president said is the idea that Republicans caused the affordability problem is a hoax.” “And I think that’s true.” “If you go back to the Biden administration, inflation got up to 9% inflation.” “Right now it’s at 3.5%. By the way, too high. We’re doing everything we can to bring it back down to 2.5%, where most people would like to see it.” “But we inherited an affordability problem.” “We’re doing a lot to make it better.” “It’s going to take a little more time. There’s a lot more work to do.” “But the president knows a lot of Americans are struggling. He ran on that. He talked about it.” “And we’ve done some things and made some good progress on that point.”

Overton

62,643 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Elon Musk (worth $250B) answers why he’s still working: I think it's a good question you asked, because it goes to, like, at a foundational level, what is my philosophy, and why does it lead to this conclusion? So the reason is that when I was a teenager, I had, like, an existential crisis to try to figure out what's the meaning of life. There doesn't seem to be any meaning. For me, at least the religious texts, and I read all of them that I could get my hands on did not seem convincing. Then I started reading the philosophers. Be careful of reading German philosophers as a teenager. It's definitely not going to help with your depression. So reading Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, as an adult, it's much more manageable. But as a kid, you're like, “Whoa.” So then I was like, “Man, I'm just struggling to find meaning in life here.” And then I read Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. And basically what Douglas Adams was saying is that we don't really know what the right questions are to ask. The question is not, “What's the meaning of life?” In The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Earth it turns out is a big computer, and its goal is to answer the question, “What's the meaning of life?” And Earth comes up with the answer “42”. This is where the 42 number comes from. And 420 is just ten times 42. In that book, which is really sort of a book about, it's an existential philosophy book disguised as humor. They come to the conclusion that, no, the real problem is trying to formulate the question. And to really have the right question, you need a much bigger computer than Earth. And so maybe one way, I think, of characterizing this would be to say, “The universe is the answer. What is the question? Or what are the questions?” The more we can expand the scope and scale of consciousness, the better we can understand what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe. The more we can expand consciousness, become a multi-planet species, ultimately a multistellar species… we have a chance of figuring out what the hell is going on. And so this is why I think we should have more humans and both biological and digital consciousness. And why we should become a multi-planet species and a multistellar species is so that we can understand the nature of the universe. And then in order for that to occur, then we have to make sure that things are good on Earth. We don't want Earth to disappear, so sustainable energy is important.

.Elon Musk (worth $250B) answers why he’s still working: I think it's a good question you asked, because it goes to, like, at a foundational level, what is my philosophy, and why does it lead to this conclusion? So the reason is that when I was a teenager, I had, like, an existential crisis to try to figure out what's the meaning of life. There doesn't seem to be any meaning. For me, at least the religious texts, and I read all of them that I could get my hands on did not seem convincing. Then I started reading the philosophers. Be careful of reading German philosophers as a teenager. It's definitely not going to help with your depression. So reading Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, as an adult, it's much more manageable. But as a kid, you're like, “Whoa.” So then I was like, “Man, I'm just struggling to find meaning in life here.” And then I read Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. And basically what Douglas Adams was saying is that we don't really know what the right questions are to ask. The question is not, “What's the meaning of life?” In The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Earth it turns out is a big computer, and its goal is to answer the question, “What's the meaning of life?” And Earth comes up with the answer “42”. This is where the 42 number comes from. And 420 is just ten times 42. In that book, which is really sort of a book about, it's an existential philosophy book disguised as humor. They come to the conclusion that, no, the real problem is trying to formulate the question. And to really have the right question, you need a much bigger computer than Earth. And so maybe one way, I think, of characterizing this would be to say, “The universe is the answer. What is the question? Or what are the questions?” The more we can expand the scope and scale of consciousness, the better we can understand what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe. The more we can expand consciousness, become a multi-planet species, ultimately a multistellar species… we have a chance of figuring out what the hell is going on. And so this is why I think we should have more humans and both biological and digital consciousness. And why we should become a multi-planet species and a multistellar species is so that we can understand the nature of the universe. And then in order for that to occur, then we have to make sure that things are good on Earth. We don't want Earth to disappear, so sustainable energy is important.

Arjun Khemani

15,600,131 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Cocchiarella: To be clear, you want to see Barron Trump come before Congress and answer questions about his relationship with Andrew Tate? Ansari: I absolutely want to see Barron Trump come before Congress and answer questions about this. There is reporting about this, and he should answer these questions. What is his relationship with Andrew Tate? What kind of communication have they had? What kinds of connections has Barron Trump potentially made for Andrew Tate and his brother? Has he had any conversations with other White House officials about this? These are all really important questions to be asking. There’s also more reporting about Barron Trump as it pertains to financial dealings and corruption. This is not the only issue that I think Barron Trump needs to come before Congress for, but the Oversight Committee is really the place for him to answer questions. And I think it’s important to remember that Barron Trump is an adult. He is somebody who is deeply involved in Trump’s orbit and the whole manosphere, and he has a lot of influence. So he needs to be held accountable if he has committed any wrongdoing.

Cocchiarella: To be clear, you want to see Barron Trump come before Congress and answer questions about his relationship with Andrew Tate? Ansari: I absolutely want to see Barron Trump come before Congress and answer questions about this. There is reporting about this, and he should answer these questions. What is his relationship with Andrew Tate? What kind of communication have they had? What kinds of connections has Barron Trump potentially made for Andrew Tate and his brother? Has he had any conversations with other White House officials about this? These are all really important questions to be asking. There’s also more reporting about Barron Trump as it pertains to financial dealings and corruption. This is not the only issue that I think Barron Trump needs to come before Congress for, but the Oversight Committee is really the place for him to answer questions. And I think it’s important to remember that Barron Trump is an adult. He is somebody who is deeply involved in Trump’s orbit and the whole manosphere, and he has a lot of influence. So he needs to be held accountable if he has committed any wrongdoing.

Acyn

131,896 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mr Shift: What's the true innovation with prediction markets? Kalshi CEO: There's many ways to answer that question. Um there's the Kalshi piece of it, but then there's the prediction market piece of it, which are not exactly the same. “But the... the true innovation in prediction markets, I think, is this notion, like... and, and I think it has been built through a lot of literature, and then I think the prediction markets have come in our generation, like Kalshi and some of the others have proven it” “The best way to answer like all these most pressing questions is like you have to ask the crowd”

Mr Shift: What's the true innovation with prediction markets? Kalshi CEO: There's many ways to answer that question. Um there's the Kalshi piece of it, but then there's the prediction market piece of it, which are not exactly the same. “But the... the true innovation in prediction markets, I think, is this notion, like... and, and I think it has been built through a lot of literature, and then I think the prediction markets have come in our generation, like Kalshi and some of the others have proven it” “The best way to answer like all these most pressing questions is like you have to ask the crowd”

ShaDow | Clipur.com

23,860 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад