Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Climate models predict rising CO2 will reduce the heat escaping into space. The IPCC expected outgoing long-wave radiation to fall by about 0.8 W/m² since 2000. However, satellite data show the opposite has actually occurred. Using NASA observations, a 2025 study finds outgoing long-wave radiation increased, not decreased. At... the same time, absorbed solar radiation rose sharply, about 0.8 W/m². That increase in incoming sunlight explains nearly all of the rise in Earth's energy imbalance. The expected CO2-driven reduction in heat loss was not detected. The main driver here is clouds. Changes in cloud cover strongly track both absorbed sunlight and outgoing heat. Fewer or thinner clouds reflect less sunlight back to space. More solar energy enters. The surface warms. And heat loss increases. After accounting for clouds, temperature, and water vapor, the remaining greenhouse contribution is statistically insignificant. Since 2000, Earth has warmed slightly. But because more sunlight is getting in, not because less heat is getting out.show more

Electroverse

43,044 subscribers

34,736 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Sunlight at Earth's surface has surged since the 1980s. Germany's Potsdam station shows 15 more W/m² of solar energy reaching the ground than during the 1970s dimming era. The Netherlands, Switzerland and Japan all show the same trend. Austria shows even more: 23 extra W/m². It's called global brightening. As air pollution dropped, the atmosphere cleared and sunlight flooded back in. That increase in surface radiation is 10 times larger than the forcing from CO2 over the same period. In short, the air got cleaner, the sunlight stronger and the land a little warmer. The data say so, the physics say so, it's only the narrative that doesn't.

Sunlight at Earth's surface has surged since the 1980s. Germany's Potsdam station shows 15 more W/m² of solar energy reaching the ground than during the 1970s dimming era. The Netherlands, Switzerland and Japan all show the same trend. Austria shows even more: 23 extra W/m². It's called global brightening. As air pollution dropped, the atmosphere cleared and sunlight flooded back in. That increase in surface radiation is 10 times larger than the forcing from CO2 over the same period. In short, the air got cleaner, the sunlight stronger and the land a little warmer. The data say so, the physics say so, it's only the narrative that doesn't.

Electroverse

51,429 views • 3 months ago

A new study shows most modern warming comes from the sun, not CO2. Dutch researcher Ad Huijser analyzed NASA satellite data and Argo ocean records and found that Earth is gaining more energy than greenhouse gases can account for. The planet's energy imbalance is rising by about 0.049 watts per square meter per year, while total greenhouse gas forcing is only 0.019. The missing heat comes from increased sunlight reaching the surface as cloud cover thinned. The data show a natural shift, not a man-made one.

A new study shows most modern warming comes from the sun, not CO2. Dutch researcher Ad Huijser analyzed NASA satellite data and Argo ocean records and found that Earth is gaining more energy than greenhouse gases can account for. The planet's energy imbalance is rising by about 0.049 watts per square meter per year, while total greenhouse gas forcing is only 0.019. The missing heat comes from increased sunlight reaching the surface as cloud cover thinned. The data show a natural shift, not a man-made one.

Electroverse

17,619 views • 3 months ago

Earth is getting darker and almost nobody is covering it. NASA's CERES satellites have tracked Earth's albedo since 2003. It's fallen from 29.3% → 28.7%. That 0.6% = ~0.5 W/m² of extra absorbed energy. For context, a major extra warming force — and in 2023 it spiked to 1 W/m² above the 20-year average. Why is it dropping? → Arctic sea ice is disappearing → Snow cover is declining earlier each spring → Low-level clouds over oceans are thinning White surfaces reflect sunlight. Dark ocean absorbs it. Every square meter of lost ice = more heat trapped. The feedback loop is the real problem: Fossil fuels → warming → ice melts → albedo drops → more warming → more ice melts It's self-reinforcing. And 2023–2025 shows the steepest drop in the entire record. This chart should be in every climate briefing. Data is public: The planet is losing its sunscreen in real time. #Albedo #ClimateFeedback #NASA #ClimateEmergency #CERES

Earth is getting darker and almost nobody is covering it. NASA's CERES satellites have tracked Earth's albedo since 2003. It's fallen from 29.3% → 28.7%. That 0.6% = ~0.5 W/m² of extra absorbed energy. For context, a major extra warming force — and in 2023 it spiked to 1 W/m² above the 20-year average. Why is it dropping? → Arctic sea ice is disappearing → Snow cover is declining earlier each spring → Low-level clouds over oceans are thinning White surfaces reflect sunlight. Dark ocean absorbs it. Every square meter of lost ice = more heat trapped. The feedback loop is the real problem: Fossil fuels → warming → ice melts → albedo drops → more warming → more ice melts It's self-reinforcing. And 2023–2025 shows the steepest drop in the entire record. This chart should be in every climate briefing. Data is public: The planet is losing its sunscreen in real time. #Albedo #ClimateFeedback #NASA #ClimateEmergency #CERES

Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM

36,080 views • 5 months ago

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

437,820 views • 1 year ago

Time to tell the truth about the real science. The science behind “climate change” is false. As I point out in this speech the amount of energy absorbed by CO2 is incredibly small and is quickly lost via convection (the wind) through the force of gravity. The idea that one CO2 molecule can heat up 10,000 N2 and O2 molecules by 1 degree and then maintain that increase in temperature is false. Assuming equal molecule weights that would require that the CO2 molecule is 10,000 degrees in order to confirm with Newton’s third law of motion or the 1st law of thermodynamics. This is clearly impossible. The temperature of the Sun is 5,700 degrees and the heat inside an internal combustion engine of a space ship is 3,000 degrees. Furthermore gases are terrible conductors of heat so it’s very difficult for gas to transfer heat to other molecules. This science of physics and in particular thermodynamics isn’t being taught in schools. It is allowing the climate alarmists to spread their false narrative about climate change which is being used to waste tens of billions of dollars on renewables which in itself is destroying our environment. Only People First has the technical understanding of the true science of heat - thermodynamics- to destroy the climate debate once and for all.

Time to tell the truth about the real science. The science behind “climate change” is false. As I point out in this speech the amount of energy absorbed by CO2 is incredibly small and is quickly lost via convection (the wind) through the force of gravity. The idea that one CO2 molecule can heat up 10,000 N2 and O2 molecules by 1 degree and then maintain that increase in temperature is false. Assuming equal molecule weights that would require that the CO2 molecule is 10,000 degrees in order to confirm with Newton’s third law of motion or the 1st law of thermodynamics. This is clearly impossible. The temperature of the Sun is 5,700 degrees and the heat inside an internal combustion engine of a space ship is 3,000 degrees. Furthermore gases are terrible conductors of heat so it’s very difficult for gas to transfer heat to other molecules. This science of physics and in particular thermodynamics isn’t being taught in schools. It is allowing the climate alarmists to spread their false narrative about climate change which is being used to waste tens of billions of dollars on renewables which in itself is destroying our environment. Only People First has the technical understanding of the true science of heat - thermodynamics- to destroy the climate debate once and for all.

Senator Gerard Rennick

89,361 views • 1 year ago

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

Electroverse

31,215 views • 2 months ago

$This is the next big plan for SpaceX: AI Data Centers in Space. • To achieve even a small fraction of a Kardashev Type II civilization (harnessing the full energy of the Sun), AI compute will require orders of magnitude more energy than Earth can ever provide. • Earth only intercepts about 1–2 billionths of the Sun’s total energy output. • Massive-scale AI (e.g., a million times more energy than Earth could produce) can only be powered by capturing far more solar energy in space. • Space-based solar-powered AI satellites/compute clusters are therefore inevitable. • In space, sunlight is continuous (no night, no clouds, no atmosphere), so no batteries are needed. • Solar panels in space can be extremely lightweight and cheap (no glass, no storm-proof framing required). • Cooling in space is dramatically easier and simpler: just radiate heat directly into the cold vacuum — no water, no fans, no liquids, no massive cooling infrastructure. • Most of the mass/volume of current supercomputer racks (e.g., GB300) is cooling hardware; in space that largely disappears. • The cost-effectiveness of electricity and compute in space will soon be overwhelmingly better than on Earth. • Elon’s Prediction: within ~5 years (by ~2030), the lowest-cost way to run large-scale AI will be solar-powered satellites in space. • A terawatt/year of AI compute is essentially impossible on Earth with any realistic build-out of power plants. • Scaling both power generation and cooling on Earth at the required rate is physically and politically unfeasible.$

This is the next big plan for SpaceX: AI Data Centers in Space. • To achieve even a small fraction of a Kardashev Type II civilization (harnessing the full energy of the Sun), AI compute will require orders of magnitude more energy than Earth can ever provide. • Earth only intercepts about 1–2 billionths of the Sun’s total energy output. • Massive-scale AI (e.g., a million times more energy than Earth could produce) can only be powered by capturing far more solar energy in space. • Space-based solar-powered AI satellites/compute clusters are therefore inevitable. • In space, sunlight is continuous (no night, no clouds, no atmosphere), so no batteries are needed. • Solar panels in space can be extremely lightweight and cheap (no glass, no storm-proof framing required). • Cooling in space is dramatically easier and simpler: just radiate heat directly into the cold vacuum — no water, no fans, no liquids, no massive cooling infrastructure. • Most of the mass/volume of current supercomputer racks (e.g., GB300) is cooling hardware; in space that largely disappears. • The cost-effectiveness of electricity and compute in space will soon be overwhelmingly better than on Earth. • Elon’s Prediction: within ~5 years (by ~2030), the lowest-cost way to run large-scale AI will be solar-powered satellites in space. • A terawatt/year of AI compute is essentially impossible on Earth with any realistic build-out of power plants. • Scaling both power generation and cooling on Earth at the required rate is physically and politically unfeasible.

Nic Cruz Patane

49,035 views • 7 months ago

A new study of U.S. temperatures from 1899 to 2025 uses 40 million daily records across 1,211 stations It finds extremes have declined. The most intense heat remains in the 1930s. In 1936, about 22% of stations recorded all-time highs. No modern year comes close. Heat waves peak between 1930 and 1944, then drop and only partly recover. The long-term trend is flat to down. Cold extremes also decline, but mostly at night. This is largely a product of urbanization over the decades, which traps heat and so lifts overnight lows. Overall, the extreme temperature burden is down about 30%. U.S. temperatures are less extreme today, not more.

A new study of U.S. temperatures from 1899 to 2025 uses 40 million daily records across 1,211 stations It finds extremes have declined. The most intense heat remains in the 1930s. In 1936, about 22% of stations recorded all-time highs. No modern year comes close. Heat waves peak between 1930 and 1944, then drop and only partly recover. The long-term trend is flat to down. Cold extremes also decline, but mostly at night. This is largely a product of urbanization over the decades, which traps heat and so lifts overnight lows. Overall, the extreme temperature burden is down about 30%. U.S. temperatures are less extreme today, not more.

Electroverse

92,456 views • 3 months ago

Starcloud (starcloud_inc1) recently made history by launching a satellite with an NVIDIA H100 into orbit — the first time a GPU that powerful has ever operated in space. It's the first step toward building AI data centers in orbit, powered by continuous sunlight and cooled by radiating heat into deep space. Their approach could one day rival the world's biggest data centers while using less energy, zero fresh water, and far lower emissions. YC's Aaron Epstein visited Starcloud's HQ, where co-founders , Ezra Feilden, and Adrian Andrei Oltean explained how they built a working prototype in just 15 months — and why big tech is racing to space for AI compute.

Starcloud (starcloud_inc1) recently made history by launching a satellite with an NVIDIA H100 into orbit — the first time a GPU that powerful has ever operated in space. It's the first step toward building AI data centers in orbit, powered by continuous sunlight and cooled by radiating heat into deep space. Their approach could one day rival the world's biggest data centers while using less energy, zero fresh water, and far lower emissions. YC's Aaron Epstein visited Starcloud's HQ, where co-founders , Ezra Feilden, and Adrian Andrei Oltean explained how they built a working prototype in just 15 months — and why big tech is racing to space for AI compute.

Y Combinator

341,525 views • 8 months ago

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Camus

20,811 views • 11 months ago

WATCH: CBS exposes European climate arrogance and steadfast refusal to adopt A/C in the face of a deadly heat wave, TONY DOKOUPIL: We are launching a new series here tonight, something we are calling The Big Question- the first one inspired by our news of more than a thousand heat-related deaths in Europe. The continent has more heat-related deaths per capita than anywhere else on the planet but in fact fewer hot days. So why is the heat in Europe so much deadlier than everywhere else? He is Leigh Kiniry with The Big Question. LEIGH KINIRY: In Europe, there's a perfect storm. The oldest population on any continent that's warming the fastest. France's record heat last week is linked to roughly 1000 deaths of mostly elderly. INE VANDECASTEELE: All climate related impacts on hazards, heat is the biggest killer. KINIRY: European officials are calling for change, but not the kind that may seem obvious. Install air conditioning, especially for vulnerable people, and save lives. Why is that not a solution in Europe? VANDECASTEELE: My honest response is I don't think that should be the solution anywhere. In the longer term, what happens is installing more air conditioning actually emits more heat into our environment so it will actually increase the speed of warming. KINIRY: It's also more expensive. Energy prices are much higher in Europe. Governments find other ways to cool historic and densely populated cities. In Rome, wearable technology is distributed to monitor the elderly who are by far in the most danger. A recent survey in France said one in six people they surveyed said they'd rather suffer for the sake of the environment. Does that surprise you? VANDECASTEELE: No. We’re not doing this for us. We’re doing this for the future generations. KINIRY: Leigh Kiniry, CBS News, London.

WATCH: CBS exposes European climate arrogance and steadfast refusal to adopt A/C in the face of a deadly heat wave, TONY DOKOUPIL: We are launching a new series here tonight, something we are calling The Big Question- the first one inspired by our news of more than a thousand heat-related deaths in Europe. The continent has more heat-related deaths per capita than anywhere else on the planet but in fact fewer hot days. So why is the heat in Europe so much deadlier than everywhere else? He is Leigh Kiniry with The Big Question. LEIGH KINIRY: In Europe, there's a perfect storm. The oldest population on any continent that's warming the fastest. France's record heat last week is linked to roughly 1000 deaths of mostly elderly. INE VANDECASTEELE: All climate related impacts on hazards, heat is the biggest killer. KINIRY: European officials are calling for change, but not the kind that may seem obvious. Install air conditioning, especially for vulnerable people, and save lives. Why is that not a solution in Europe? VANDECASTEELE: My honest response is I don't think that should be the solution anywhere. In the longer term, what happens is installing more air conditioning actually emits more heat into our environment so it will actually increase the speed of warming. KINIRY: It's also more expensive. Energy prices are much higher in Europe. Governments find other ways to cool historic and densely populated cities. In Rome, wearable technology is distributed to monitor the elderly who are by far in the most danger. A recent survey in France said one in six people they surveyed said they'd rather suffer for the sake of the environment. Does that surprise you? VANDECASTEELE: No. We’re not doing this for us. We’re doing this for the future generations. KINIRY: Leigh Kiniry, CBS News, London.

Jorge Bonilla

63,689 views • 1 month ago

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

Electroverse

18,558 views • 3 months ago

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

Open Minded Approach

32,305 views • 3 months ago

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

Open Minded Approach

48,645 views • 6 months ago

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

Open Minded Approach

160,503 views • 7 months ago

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

The last two catastrophic events were connected to Grand Solar Minima and increased cosmic radiation, which directly led to increased volcanic activity, famine, plagues, and the Little Ice Ages. In both 1300 AD and 536 AD, half of the world’s population perished, and the third global cooling is known as the Iron Age Cold Epoch, which occurred after the Bronze Age Collapse and the Sterno Etrussia geomagnetic excursion. This one was more severe because of the geomagnetic excursion. Currently we are undergoing a geomagnetic excursion, and scientists predict that it is time for another Grand Solar Minima, which should begin between 2030 and 2040. This one is expected to be more extreme because cosmic radiation will be more intense, as the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening significantly for the last 150 years and the trend continues with the pole shift. So if you are wondering why the world is in chaos, why there are wars, and why government spending continues despite inflation, it is because they are preparing their doomsday bunkers for survival.

Open Minded Approach

33,201 views • 6 months ago

Katharine Hayhoe, climate scientist and WEF agenda contributor: "And so often when I speak of climate change, I don't call it global warming, because as individuals, we don't experience the average temperature of the planet. But what I do call it is global weirding." "Because wherever people live, they recognize that something is weird. You can talk to almost anyone. can say, if you live here, do you feel the weather is weird? And they will say yes. Scientists have predicted this. We've known for a long time that climate change is loading the weather dice against us." "We've known that as the average temperature of the planet increases, heat waves will become more intense, the heat wave season will be extended. Heavy downpours will become more frequent, and flood risk will increase in many places." "The intensity of tropical storms, including cyclones, hurricanes, typhoons, will increase. And droughts, like the one being experienced in Syria right now, which would not be a drought if it were not for human-induced warming, would become more intense."

Katharine Hayhoe, climate scientist and WEF agenda contributor: "And so often when I speak of climate change, I don't call it global warming, because as individuals, we don't experience the average temperature of the planet. But what I do call it is global weirding." "Because wherever people live, they recognize that something is weird. You can talk to almost anyone. can say, if you live here, do you feel the weather is weird? And they will say yes. Scientists have predicted this. We've known for a long time that climate change is loading the weather dice against us." "We've known that as the average temperature of the planet increases, heat waves will become more intense, the heat wave season will be extended. Heavy downpours will become more frequent, and flood risk will increase in many places." "The intensity of tropical storms, including cyclones, hurricanes, typhoons, will increase. And droughts, like the one being experienced in Syria right now, which would not be a drought if it were not for human-induced warming, would become more intense."

Camus

50,067 views • 11 months ago