Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Clint Curtis alleged in 2000 that representative Tom Feeney had him write software to undetectably alter election results on voting machines. Curtis testified under oath that his program could award a specific candidate 51% of the vote. No accountability. Nothing truly changed.

TLAVagabond's profile picture

The Last American Vagabond

80,184 subscribers

15,355 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Obama administration used a powerful CIA/NSA surveillance program originally built in 2003 to hunt terrorists overseas, but then used it to spy on American citizens, and later expanded the software to alter election outcomes. Just weeks after Obama took office in 2009, the program called "The Hammer (HAMR)" was illegally shifted to a secret CIA facility in Fort Washington, MD, and turned against American citizens for domestic spying, violating the Constitution. Obama, Joe Biden, John Brennan, and James Clapper were directly involved in the illegal operation. Scorecard software was later added, which is a vote-manipulation tool installed on the Hammer system to intercept election data and flip 3% of votes in real time during transmission from voting machines/tabulators. Just another form of election manipulation on top of many others. The system was deployed in the 2012 election and Democratic primaries, and possibly in the 2016 and 2020 election as well. The most interesting part is that electronic vote manipulation goes back to the early 2000s. In October 2000, while working as a computer programmer at Yang Enterprises in Oviedo, Florida, computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis was directly approached by Tom Feeney, then Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives and the company's lobbyist, along with the company's corporate attorney to create a prototype program capable of rigging elections. The software was designed to secretly flip votes 51-49 in favor of any chosen candidate or race without being noticed by election officials. Curtis states the program would be completely undetectable by county boards of elections unless someone examined the actual source code or had a verifiable paper trail/receipt to compare against the electronic totals. When Curtis initially provided a report on how to detect and prevent such fraud, including mandatory paper trails and source code reviews, the company owner, Mrs. Yang, rejected it and instructed him to hide the fraud in the source code instead. She reportedly told him it was needed "to control the vote in South Florida." Curtis confirms he wrote the prototype as requested but left the company shortly afterward. He testified that such vote-rigging software is simple to create, hundreds of lines of code at most, and could be inserted into central tabulators or voting systems. During his court testimony on this very program and the fraud in Ohio's 2004 election, based on significant discrepancies between exit polling data and official results in the 2004 Ohio presidential election, plus the known availability of rigging software and lack of protective measures, Curtis stated under oath that the 2004 Ohio election was likely hacked as well. This was just the early days of election rigging software and programs. Obama and his administration continued with their own endeavors as technology progressed, especially with Smartmatic and the use of wireless internet and remote access from anywhere in the world. This has been going on long enough, it's time to end any and all of these election rigging practices and programs and bring back real election integrity. If we don't fix our elections, we will lose this country, and it all starts with holding these people accountable.
9:38

The Obama administration used a powerful CIA/NSA surveillance program originally built in 2003 to hunt terrorists overseas, but then used it to spy on American citizens, and later expanded the software to alter election outcomes. Just weeks after Obama took office in 2009, the program called "The Hammer (HAMR)" was illegally shifted to a secret CIA facility in Fort Washington, MD, and turned against American citizens for domestic spying, violating the Constitution. Obama, Joe Biden, John Brennan, and James Clapper were directly involved in the illegal operation. Scorecard software was later added, which is a vote-manipulation tool installed on the Hammer system to intercept election data and flip 3% of votes in real time during transmission from voting machines/tabulators. Just another form of election manipulation on top of many others. The system was deployed in the 2012 election and Democratic primaries, and possibly in the 2016 and 2020 election as well. The most interesting part is that electronic vote manipulation goes back to the early 2000s. In October 2000, while working as a computer programmer at Yang Enterprises in Oviedo, Florida, computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis was directly approached by Tom Feeney, then Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives and the company's lobbyist, along with the company's corporate attorney to create a prototype program capable of rigging elections. The software was designed to secretly flip votes 51-49 in favor of any chosen candidate or race without being noticed by election officials. Curtis states the program would be completely undetectable by county boards of elections unless someone examined the actual source code or had a verifiable paper trail/receipt to compare against the electronic totals. When Curtis initially provided a report on how to detect and prevent such fraud, including mandatory paper trails and source code reviews, the company owner, Mrs. Yang, rejected it and instructed him to hide the fraud in the source code instead. She reportedly told him it was needed "to control the vote in South Florida." Curtis confirms he wrote the prototype as requested but left the company shortly afterward. He testified that such vote-rigging software is simple to create, hundreds of lines of code at most, and could be inserted into central tabulators or voting systems. During his court testimony on this very program and the fraud in Ohio's 2004 election, based on significant discrepancies between exit polling data and official results in the 2004 Ohio presidential election, plus the known availability of rigging software and lack of protective measures, Curtis stated under oath that the 2004 Ohio election was likely hacked as well. This was just the early days of election rigging software and programs. Obama and his administration continued with their own endeavors as technology progressed, especially with Smartmatic and the use of wireless internet and remote access from anywhere in the world. This has been going on long enough, it's time to end any and all of these election rigging practices and programs and bring back real election integrity. If we don't fix our elections, we will lose this country, and it all starts with holding these people accountable.

The SCIF

38,887 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WOW 🚨 Federal court case reveals Dominion voting machines in America are being worked in by foreigners outside the US The court case revealed people outside the US can REMOTELY CONNECT to our voting machines, “something voters were repeatedly told could not happen” “Voting system software, election system code and vote counting programs@ ‘Voters were told U.S. voting system software had no foreign involvement. A former Dominion executive admitted under oath that foreign individuals worked on election code.’ “In plain terms, people outside of the United States were involved in building and working on parts of the software that helps run U.S. elections. Cooper also admitted that foreign employees were able to connect to Dominion equipment located in Denver for troubleshooting, something voters were repeatedly told could not happen.”
2:06

WOW 🚨 Federal court case reveals Dominion voting machines in America are being worked in by foreigners outside the US The court case revealed people outside the US can REMOTELY CONNECT to our voting machines, “something voters were repeatedly told could not happen” “Voting system software, election system code and vote counting programs@ ‘Voters were told U.S. voting system software had no foreign involvement. A former Dominion executive admitted under oath that foreign individuals worked on election code.’ “In plain terms, people outside of the United States were involved in building and working on parts of the software that helps run U.S. elections. Cooper also admitted that foreign employees were able to connect to Dominion equipment located in Denver for troubleshooting, something voters were repeatedly told could not happen.”

Wall Street Apes

79,651 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

CIA had intelligence electronic voting machines were manipulated to rig the election in Venezuela for the Maduro regime in 2020 — including to digitally alter vote totals that could not be detected by audit All while they lied and said elections could not be rigged on machines!
1:23

CIA had intelligence electronic voting machines were manipulated to rig the election in Venezuela for the Maduro regime in 2020 — including to digitally alter vote totals that could not be detected by audit All while they lied and said elections could not be rigged on machines!

Liz Harrington

28,732 просмотров • 24 дней назад

🚨TEXAS🚨As President Trump raises concerns about the security of voting machines, Karen Wiseman of Citizens for Election Integrity recently testified that she witnessed voting machines in Tarrant County being easily hacked and saw a vote for a candidate recorded as an undervote.
4:22

🚨TEXAS🚨As President Trump raises concerns about the security of voting machines, Karen Wiseman of Citizens for Election Integrity recently testified that she witnessed voting machines in Tarrant County being easily hacked and saw a vote for a candidate recorded as an undervote.

Carlos Turcios

33,323 просмотров • 24 дней назад

GardenStateAF Twiggs testified under oath that it was his phone. They would've had to plant the messages right in front of him.
0:58

GardenStateAF Twiggs testified under oath that it was his phone. They would've had to plant the messages right in front of him.

Nick Sortor

14,998 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A software engineer and election expert states under oath that the software used in our elections was specifically designed to rig elections, with the most common margin of victory outcome of 51% to 49%, because it was designed by the expert himself.
45:13

A software engineer and election expert states under oath that the software used in our elections was specifically designed to rig elections, with the most common margin of victory outcome of 51% to 49%, because it was designed by the expert himself.

The SCIF

270,783 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In 1967, Tony Curtis felt unsatisfied with the recent movies he had starred in. He though his career was losing momentum & needed a new challenge. "The Boston Str@ngler" (1968) provided him the perfect opportunity. He had heard that the producer was looking at many actors to play the title role irrespective of the popularity. Richard Fleischer also wanted Tony Curtis to star in the movie. However, Darryl F. Zanuck didn't think Curtis was right for the part. He thought Curtis was too recognisable to play the character. One day, Curtis took some putty and built himself a big nose, changed his eyelashes, eyebrows and hair. He took photos of himself with his 35mm camera —profiles and front views — and had two dozen eight-by-tens printed up on grainy paper. He gave them to Richard Fleischer, who went to Zanuck's office, threw the pictures on the table, and said, “Here’s your strangler.” Zanuck said, “Yeah, that guy could be him. I like that look—who is it?” , Fleischer replied, “Tony!”. He was then cast in the picture. ("Tony Curtis: The Autobiography", Tony Curtis and Barry Paris, 1993) P.S: Remembering Tony Curtis on his 101st birthday!
1:58

In 1967, Tony Curtis felt unsatisfied with the recent movies he had starred in. He though his career was losing momentum & needed a new challenge. "The Boston Str@ngler" (1968) provided him the perfect opportunity. He had heard that the producer was looking at many actors to play the title role irrespective of the popularity. Richard Fleischer also wanted Tony Curtis to star in the movie. However, Darryl F. Zanuck didn't think Curtis was right for the part. He thought Curtis was too recognisable to play the character. One day, Curtis took some putty and built himself a big nose, changed his eyelashes, eyebrows and hair. He took photos of himself with his 35mm camera —profiles and front views — and had two dozen eight-by-tens printed up on grainy paper. He gave them to Richard Fleischer, who went to Zanuck's office, threw the pictures on the table, and said, “Here’s your strangler.” Zanuck said, “Yeah, that guy could be him. I like that look—who is it?” , Fleischer replied, “Tony!”. He was then cast in the picture. ("Tony Curtis: The Autobiography", Tony Curtis and Barry Paris, 1993) P.S: Remembering Tony Curtis on his 101st birthday!

DepressedBergman

43,963 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.
4:05

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.

The SCIF

152,165 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Pennsylvania… your elections are rigged. Last night, a special election concluded in Lancaster county Pennsylvania, pulling democrat Malone on top, with a .89% margin victory, with an unknown amount of provisional ballots outstanding That is a big red flag… This was a deep red area, and is the first time a Democrat has held the seat in decades. Democrats are chalking the win up as a call to action for people who are tired of the way Donald Trump is running the country…. That’s bullshit. I refuse to believe that elections with such large voter turnouts are that close… under 1%. Not in a state where Donald Trump won handily with a 15%+ margin, despite all the fraud. I refuse to believe that Americans are that equally divided on radical issues such as defunding the police, illegal immigration, letting rapists, pedos, and murderers free, etc in a deep historically red area. I refuse to believe that democrats ALWAYS start every race out with a 25-30% lead because of mail-in ballots. Mail in ballots along with those damn machines are still a problem.. they flip votes based on an algorithm to keep it close 50-49 or 51-50.. 🔴 Don’t believe it? Here is testimony that it’s been done in Florida. It is naive to think that this great power to control election outcomes was never used again. In 2004, Clinton Eugene Curtis, an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-NASA employee (Speaker of the House of Florida at the time), admits that elections can indeed be fixed & it would go undetectable. Curtis testifies under oath that he rigged computer election results for then Congressman Tom Feeney, the former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. - Are there programs that can secretly be used to fix elections? —— Yes. October, 2000, Tom Feeney Former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives asked me to do it. “It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to.” • How could a secret program be detected? Source Code, receipt & count hard paper against the vote total. If not, you won’t see it. • “You don’t understand, we need to hide the fraud in the source code, not reveal the fraud, to control the vote in South Florida”. • Central tabulators can flip votes. A person with bad code can affect thousands & thousands of votes. A recount will not reveal the fraud between a central tabulator & a tampered machine. The tabulators can tell the machines to switch the results when they are networked together. The full testimony
1:10

Pennsylvania… your elections are rigged. Last night, a special election concluded in Lancaster county Pennsylvania, pulling democrat Malone on top, with a .89% margin victory, with an unknown amount of provisional ballots outstanding That is a big red flag… This was a deep red area, and is the first time a Democrat has held the seat in decades. Democrats are chalking the win up as a call to action for people who are tired of the way Donald Trump is running the country…. That’s bullshit. I refuse to believe that elections with such large voter turnouts are that close… under 1%. Not in a state where Donald Trump won handily with a 15%+ margin, despite all the fraud. I refuse to believe that Americans are that equally divided on radical issues such as defunding the police, illegal immigration, letting rapists, pedos, and murderers free, etc in a deep historically red area. I refuse to believe that democrats ALWAYS start every race out with a 25-30% lead because of mail-in ballots. Mail in ballots along with those damn machines are still a problem.. they flip votes based on an algorithm to keep it close 50-49 or 51-50.. 🔴 Don’t believe it? Here is testimony that it’s been done in Florida. It is naive to think that this great power to control election outcomes was never used again. In 2004, Clinton Eugene Curtis, an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-NASA employee (Speaker of the House of Florida at the time), admits that elections can indeed be fixed & it would go undetectable. Curtis testifies under oath that he rigged computer election results for then Congressman Tom Feeney, the former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. - Are there programs that can secretly be used to fix elections? —— Yes. October, 2000, Tom Feeney Former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives asked me to do it. “It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to.” • How could a secret program be detected? Source Code, receipt & count hard paper against the vote total. If not, you won’t see it. • “You don’t understand, we need to hide the fraud in the source code, not reveal the fraud, to control the vote in South Florida”. • Central tabulators can flip votes. A person with bad code can affect thousands & thousands of votes. A recount will not reveal the fraud between a central tabulator & a tampered machine. The tabulators can tell the machines to switch the results when they are networked together. The full testimony

MJTruthUltra

74,251 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dominion Voting Machines allegedly switched a staggering 435,000 votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 Election, with a combination of tweaked algorithms in the software, direct remote access to the machines, and adjudication live on site or from a remote location. Algorithmic anomalies—possibly embedded in the software—led to systematic vote flipping, detailed charts and graphs showing vote spikes and drops that defy typical patterns, with specific examples from Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. Batches of votes appeared to shift from one candidate to the other, always favoring the Democrats and Joe Biden, totaling the claimed 435,000 across multiple jurisdictions. Some were even caught live on tv where Trump would lose the exact amount of vote totals that Biden would gain at the same time.
4:37

Dominion Voting Machines allegedly switched a staggering 435,000 votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 Election, with a combination of tweaked algorithms in the software, direct remote access to the machines, and adjudication live on site or from a remote location. Algorithmic anomalies—possibly embedded in the software—led to systematic vote flipping, detailed charts and graphs showing vote spikes and drops that defy typical patterns, with specific examples from Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. Batches of votes appeared to shift from one candidate to the other, always favoring the Democrats and Joe Biden, totaling the claimed 435,000 across multiple jurisdictions. Some were even caught live on tv where Trump would lose the exact amount of vote totals that Biden would gain at the same time.

The SCIF

47,359 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Declassified NICM on VULNERABILITIES in U.S. 2020 Election Infrastructure. We judge that US adversaries, including at a minimum Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, as well as nonstate groups, have the capability to compromise US election infrastructure for the 2020 presidential election. We assess that at least Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea have the capability to access and potentially manipulate data in US election-related computer systems. We assess that centralized election-related data repositories, such as voter registration databases, pollbooks, and official election websites, are most vulnerable to exploitation, and adversaries could use access to these systems to disrupt election processes. Systems that tabulate, transmit, or display election results are vulnerable to localized exploitation but would be difficult to manipulate on a wide enough scale to alter the election outcome. Adversary claims of manipulation would be difficult to disprove and could undermine public confidence in election results. We assess that adversaries could most easily exploit centralized election-related data repositories because of their ease of access and comparative lack of security. - Voter Registration Databases. - Pollbooks. - State and Local Election Officials' Websites. We assess that systems designed to tabulate votes, transmit vote amounts, or display election results probably are vulnerable to localized exploitation. Direct recording electronic machines, which record and process votes digitally and store tabulation data in removable memory, are particularly vulnerable to cyber operations, especially machines with no paper backup. Adversaries who obtained physical access to voting machines could alter how they function, manipulate the data in them, or install malware, according to US state and academic investigations. At the 2019 DefCon cyber security conference, hackers demonstrated the ability to compromise more than 100 voting machines, all of which had been certified for use in at least one US voting jurisdiction. Ballot and voting machine preparation is vulnerable to cyber, supply chain, or insider threats. Ballot Preparation. Creating paper or electronic ballots to upload to voting machines is usually outsourced to third-party vendors. Some use Internet-connected computer systems and lack password and encryption policies, which could allow malicious actors to corrupt ballot files. Logic and accuracy tests to ensure the machines function properly before election day, however, probably would detect such activity. Voting Machine Preparation. Voting machines configured at a central location are vulnerable to insider threats. Malware introduced into the voting machines during this phase might affect multiple jurisdictions but also would be detectable during the pre-election testing. These findings cover a small portion of the overall findings, read the full document for full scope and findings.
1:07

Declassified NICM on VULNERABILITIES in U.S. 2020 Election Infrastructure. We judge that US adversaries, including at a minimum Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, as well as nonstate groups, have the capability to compromise US election infrastructure for the 2020 presidential election. We assess that at least Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea have the capability to access and potentially manipulate data in US election-related computer systems. We assess that centralized election-related data repositories, such as voter registration databases, pollbooks, and official election websites, are most vulnerable to exploitation, and adversaries could use access to these systems to disrupt election processes. Systems that tabulate, transmit, or display election results are vulnerable to localized exploitation but would be difficult to manipulate on a wide enough scale to alter the election outcome. Adversary claims of manipulation would be difficult to disprove and could undermine public confidence in election results. We assess that adversaries could most easily exploit centralized election-related data repositories because of their ease of access and comparative lack of security. - Voter Registration Databases. - Pollbooks. - State and Local Election Officials' Websites. We assess that systems designed to tabulate votes, transmit vote amounts, or display election results probably are vulnerable to localized exploitation. Direct recording electronic machines, which record and process votes digitally and store tabulation data in removable memory, are particularly vulnerable to cyber operations, especially machines with no paper backup. Adversaries who obtained physical access to voting machines could alter how they function, manipulate the data in them, or install malware, according to US state and academic investigations. At the 2019 DefCon cyber security conference, hackers demonstrated the ability to compromise more than 100 voting machines, all of which had been certified for use in at least one US voting jurisdiction. Ballot and voting machine preparation is vulnerable to cyber, supply chain, or insider threats. Ballot Preparation. Creating paper or electronic ballots to upload to voting machines is usually outsourced to third-party vendors. Some use Internet-connected computer systems and lack password and encryption policies, which could allow malicious actors to corrupt ballot files. Logic and accuracy tests to ensure the machines function properly before election day, however, probably would detect such activity. Voting Machine Preparation. Voting machines configured at a central location are vulnerable to insider threats. Malware introduced into the voting machines during this phase might affect multiple jurisdictions but also would be detectable during the pre-election testing. These findings cover a small portion of the overall findings, read the full document for full scope and findings.

The SCIF

30,426 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Fauci testified under oath that the NIH did NOT fund gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan. The statute of limitations for lying to Congress expires TODAY. No indictment. No accountability. Millions of lives & trillions of dollars later… & Fauci walks free.
1:37

Fauci testified under oath that the NIH did NOT fund gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan. The statute of limitations for lying to Congress expires TODAY. No indictment. No accountability. Millions of lives & trillions of dollars later… & Fauci walks free.

Derrick Evans

63,648 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Professional Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath That He Coded Computers To Rig Elections In 2006 Our Elections Are So 100% Safe & Secure We Have Sworn Testimony Congressman Have PAID To Have Programs Written To Rig Elections Q&A “What is your profession? I'm a computer programmer. Would you please speak into the microphone so the audience can hear your testimony? I'm a computer programmer. Mr. Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that would be the case? Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for President Congressman Tom Feeney at the company I worked for in Ovigo, Florida that did just that. And when you say did just that, it would rig an election? It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win. Be something that elections officials that might be on county boards of elections could detect? They'd never see it. Mr. Would you answer that question once again? They would never see it. So how would such a such a program a secret program that fixes the election how could it be detected? You would have to view it either in the source code or you'd have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual vote total. Other than that, you won't see it.” — This is a very long testimony and worth listening to the entire thing. I’m unable to provide a full transcription due to X’s text limits
6:55

Professional Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath That He Coded Computers To Rig Elections In 2006 Our Elections Are So 100% Safe & Secure We Have Sworn Testimony Congressman Have PAID To Have Programs Written To Rig Elections Q&A “What is your profession? I'm a computer programmer. Would you please speak into the microphone so the audience can hear your testimony? I'm a computer programmer. Mr. Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that would be the case? Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for President Congressman Tom Feeney at the company I worked for in Ovigo, Florida that did just that. And when you say did just that, it would rig an election? It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win. Be something that elections officials that might be on county boards of elections could detect? They'd never see it. Mr. Would you answer that question once again? They would never see it. So how would such a such a program a secret program that fixes the election how could it be detected? You would have to view it either in the source code or you'd have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual vote total. Other than that, you won't see it.” — This is a very long testimony and worth listening to the entire thing. I’m unable to provide a full transcription due to X’s text limits

Wall Street Apes

745,644 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Today Baron Coleman went over the new footage of the alleged shooter on the Losee Building. He’s right, there’s no chance that whomever that was had a Mauser .30-06 on him. In fact, there’s nothing to prove that indicates he had a gun on him at all.
11:48

Today Baron Coleman went over the new footage of the alleged shooter on the Losee Building. He’s right, there’s no chance that whomever that was had a Mauser .30-06 on him. In fact, there’s nothing to prove that indicates he had a gun on him at all.

Luke Slywaker

39,365 просмотров • 11 дней назад

DOMINION Voting System's machines are so INSECURE, that CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, released a "Security Advisory" on Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X because of its EXSTENSIVE VULNERABILITIES. In 2020, Dominion's own released emails confirm and show that their hub in Serbia was accessing Colorado's election machines in real-time and was voting. Why do Serbians have full access to U.S. voting machines and are able to vote? Dominion's own CEO, testified under oath, and LIED about the machines having no modems and not being able to connect to the internet. Their own Dominion Rep was caught at their own sales convention explaining their internet capabilities and the existence of modems and working with ALL major carriers, with access to 3G, and 4G networks with remote access, even in Mongolia. Another incident happened during a court proceeding, in front of a judge, a Dominion machine was hacked, by only using a pen, to gain "Super User Access," in under 2 min, which is Admin level access, with the capability to create unlimited votes. Dominion was engineered to steal elections and was originally Smartmatic which is connected to Hugo Chavez and was originally created Venezuelan elections. They purposely built vulnerabilities into the software so that Hugo Chavez could control the outcome of the vote. The anomalies that the 2020 U.S. election experienced were similar to the same anomalies that did happen in the Venezuelan elections. Dominion and ALL voting machine software, even different "manufacturers" are based off the original code used by Smartmatic. This is a global election fraud cartel and it is operating and stealing elections in over 100+ countries. It's time to shut them down. YT: WolvesandFinance
12:13

DOMINION Voting System's machines are so INSECURE, that CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, released a "Security Advisory" on Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X because of its EXSTENSIVE VULNERABILITIES. In 2020, Dominion's own released emails confirm and show that their hub in Serbia was accessing Colorado's election machines in real-time and was voting. Why do Serbians have full access to U.S. voting machines and are able to vote? Dominion's own CEO, testified under oath, and LIED about the machines having no modems and not being able to connect to the internet. Their own Dominion Rep was caught at their own sales convention explaining their internet capabilities and the existence of modems and working with ALL major carriers, with access to 3G, and 4G networks with remote access, even in Mongolia. Another incident happened during a court proceeding, in front of a judge, a Dominion machine was hacked, by only using a pen, to gain "Super User Access," in under 2 min, which is Admin level access, with the capability to create unlimited votes. Dominion was engineered to steal elections and was originally Smartmatic which is connected to Hugo Chavez and was originally created Venezuelan elections. They purposely built vulnerabilities into the software so that Hugo Chavez could control the outcome of the vote. The anomalies that the 2020 U.S. election experienced were similar to the same anomalies that did happen in the Venezuelan elections. Dominion and ALL voting machine software, even different "manufacturers" are based off the original code used by Smartmatic. This is a global election fraud cartel and it is operating and stealing elections in over 100+ countries. It's time to shut them down. YT: WolvesandFinance

The SCIF

41,044 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Maricopa County election insider just TESTIFIED under oath — Dominion "techs" walked RIGHT INTO voting sites during a LIVE ELECTION, plugged in EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES to the machines, downloaded ballot images + sensitive data, then walked it OFF-SITE with ZERO chain of custody, NO logs, NO oversight. What were they uploading/downloading in real time while votes were being cast? Where did that data REALLY go? Who was manipulating ballots behind the curtain? This isn't oversight—it's COVER-UP. The storm is exposing the machines. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
2:48

BREAKING: Maricopa County election insider just TESTIFIED under oath — Dominion "techs" walked RIGHT INTO voting sites during a LIVE ELECTION, plugged in EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES to the machines, downloaded ballot images + sensitive data, then walked it OFF-SITE with ZERO chain of custody, NO logs, NO oversight. What were they uploading/downloading in real time while votes were being cast? Where did that data REALLY go? Who was manipulating ballots behind the curtain? This isn't oversight—it's COVER-UP. The storm is exposing the machines. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet

196,045 просмотров • 15 дней назад

🚨 BOMBSHELL DEPOSITION: REMOTE ACCESS ADMITTED? Major new revelations are emerging in the ongoing defamation cases involving Dominion’s former security director Eric Coomer. During a recent deposition, Coomer allegedly admitted under oath that there was remote access to voting system computers in 2020 - a direct contradiction to previous public claims that no such access existed. Remember: Dominion executives previously testified before Congress that voting machines did not have remote access capabilities. Now, the justification? “It was 2020… it was the pandemic.” With midterms approaching, calls are growing to eliminate electronic voting machines, end mass mail-in voting, and implement stricter safeguards. “The Constitution is clear. Citizens vote. Clean up the system.”
4:47

🚨 BOMBSHELL DEPOSITION: REMOTE ACCESS ADMITTED? Major new revelations are emerging in the ongoing defamation cases involving Dominion’s former security director Eric Coomer. During a recent deposition, Coomer allegedly admitted under oath that there was remote access to voting system computers in 2020 - a direct contradiction to previous public claims that no such access existed. Remember: Dominion executives previously testified before Congress that voting machines did not have remote access capabilities. Now, the justification? “It was 2020… it was the pandemic.” With midterms approaching, calls are growing to eliminate electronic voting machines, end mass mail-in voting, and implement stricter safeguards. “The Constitution is clear. Citizens vote. Clean up the system.”

LindellTV

77,679 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Speaker Emerita Pelosi: I could never have had the idea that a president of the United States would incite an insurrection on the Capitol, the symbol of democracy throughout the world. On the Constitution, which he took an oath to uphold. On Congress, who had the congressional responsibility to certify the results of the election. That president who incited that insurrection continues to lie about what happened that day.
1:22

Speaker Emerita Pelosi: I could never have had the idea that a president of the United States would incite an insurrection on the Capitol, the symbol of democracy throughout the world. On the Constitution, which he took an oath to uphold. On Congress, who had the congressional responsibility to certify the results of the election. That president who incited that insurrection continues to lie about what happened that day.

FactPost

16,406 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Exactly two years ago today, on July 26th, 2023, former U.S. intelligence officer David Grusch testified under oath before the House Oversight Committee, and stated that the U.S. government has operated a long-running, covert program to recover and reverse-engineer non-human craft. He alleged that “non-human biologics” had been retrieved from crash sites and that individuals involved in the program had been harmed or silenced. Grusch, a decorated veteran and former member of the UAP Task Force, based his claims on interviews with dozens of high-level officials and documented them through classified channels, including in a complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
1:52

Exactly two years ago today, on July 26th, 2023, former U.S. intelligence officer David Grusch testified under oath before the House Oversight Committee, and stated that the U.S. government has operated a long-running, covert program to recover and reverse-engineer non-human craft. He alleged that “non-human biologics” had been retrieved from crash sites and that individuals involved in the program had been harmed or silenced. Grusch, a decorated veteran and former member of the UAP Task Force, based his claims on interviews with dozens of high-level officials and documented them through classified channels, including in a complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.

Disclosure Party

25,662 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sprint and Verizon neatly labeled ethernet ports were found directly on U.S. electronic voting machines, when they told you that the machines weren't connected to the internet, even under oath. Computer experts made their own search program and found over 35 voting machines across the U.S. still connected to the internet, even though there are no elections going on. Experts also found that the software used in our elections was able to remotely access voting machines and manipulate votes without even waking up the machine, keeping the screen black at the physical location of the voting machine. This would mean nobody would even know someone was accessing the machine remotely and making changes. This should tell you everything you need to know. Pass the SAVE ACT, get rid of ALL mail-in ballots, electronic voting machines, and 3rd party companies connected to our elections, and have Congress pass a law to make states use paper only.
4:43

Sprint and Verizon neatly labeled ethernet ports were found directly on U.S. electronic voting machines, when they told you that the machines weren't connected to the internet, even under oath. Computer experts made their own search program and found over 35 voting machines across the U.S. still connected to the internet, even though there are no elections going on. Experts also found that the software used in our elections was able to remotely access voting machines and manipulate votes without even waking up the machine, keeping the screen black at the physical location of the voting machine. This would mean nobody would even know someone was accessing the machine remotely and making changes. This should tell you everything you need to know. Pass the SAVE ACT, get rid of ALL mail-in ballots, electronic voting machines, and 3rd party companies connected to our elections, and have Congress pass a law to make states use paper only.

The SCIF

296,320 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад