Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

#CNBCTV18Exclusive Confirmed | #AtanuChakraborty Exit Not Linked To Bank's Conduct, Regulatory Concerns Keki Mistry, CEO of HDFC Ltd says * Atanu was asked by my board colleagues what issues he had; He did not say anything on that * There was no power struggle at the board * #RBI...

53,404 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Atanu Kumar Mandal
Atanu Kumar Mandalvor 6 Monaten

For the retail investor, this is like the Captain of a ship resigning because he didn't like the new navigation route. 🚢 It doesn't mean the ship is sinking; it just means there's a disagreement on the bridge. As long as the RBI is the Coast Guard, the 'passengers' (depositors) are safe. The 52-week low is just market noise for a long-term SIP. 📉📈

Profilbild von Max 101
Max 101vor 6 Monaten

From reports it seems that CEO- MD weaponized the executive board members against the Chairman. Probably to ensure that he got his third term and to strengthen his coterie in the Board. A huge worry not only for investors but for #India. #RBI #HDFC @FinMinIndia @RBI @PMOIndia

Profilbild von R.S. KAFALTIYA
R.S. KAFALTIYAvor 6 Monaten

Unfortunate to see he resign from HDFC Bank. I had the opportunity to observe his leadership during his tenure at DGH a person of high integrity, deep knowledge, and dynamic approach.His contributions at DIPAM and DOEA were instrumental in key reforms. Wishing him the best ahead

Profilbild von Vijay
Vijayvor 6 Monaten

Maybe Corporate India doesn't understand the work culture of an ex-beaurocrat ,they see them as rulers instead.

Profilbild von VV
VVvor 6 Monaten

$16 billion wiped and no problems really…

Profilbild von Harry Patel
Harry Patelvor 6 Monaten

It’s a same issues Wells Fargo has faced in USA.

Profilbild von SUDIPTA KUMAR
SUDIPTA KUMARvor 6 Monaten

🤣🤣🤣

Profilbild von C U VENUGOPAL 🇮🇳🇮🇳
C U VENUGOPAL 🇮🇳🇮🇳vor 6 Monaten

Nothing there but just he made his mind one morning ,wrote a letter, left, share tanked....is it so simple?

Profilbild von Gujjubhai
Gujjubhaivor 6 Monaten

Board reshuffles happen at every large institution. What matters is RBI oversight is strong and governance frameworks are in place. Long-term investors should look at fundamentals, not headlines.

Profilbild von Leader of People (LoP)
Leader of People (LoP)vor 6 Monaten

In overnight he found everything is fine? Or asked to do whitewash?

Profilbild von Mohan Bhaktha
Mohan Bhakthavor 6 Monaten

RBI wakes up only after it is too late, like the police who used to arrive in the last scene of Hindi films of 70s, after the hero has bashed up the villain.

Ähnliche Videos

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen