正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Codex 5.3 EXTRA HIGH ve Claude Opus 4.6'yı ringe çıkardım. Sonuç gerçekten çok acayip. Genelde "Extra High" ayarı açınca modellerin kaplumbağaya dönmesini beklersiniz değil mi? Ben de öyle sanıyordum. İki tarafa da birebir aynı promptu verdim, tek bir virgül bile değiştirmedim. Claude'u yeni gelen "agent team" özelliğiyle sahaya sürdüm,...

BahaGkc's profile picture

Baha Gökce

2,063 subscribers

18,140 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Cursor— Codex-5.2 Extra-High vs Opus 4.6 Max’ı Google Earth Mini task’ı ile kıyasladım🔥 Hata: - Opus hatasız tek seferde tamamladı 🎉 Codex 2 kez hatalı yazdı. 👎🏻 Hız: - Codex 10 dakikada yazdı 🎉 Opus 19 dakikada 👎🏻 Agentic Coding; - Opus hiçbir müdahale ve plan olmadan fazlara bölüp yazdı 🎉 Codex direk search ve thinking yaparak yazdı 👎🏻👎🏻
0:47

Cursor— Codex-5.2 Extra-High vs Opus 4.6 Max’ı Google Earth Mini task’ı ile kıyasladım🔥 Hata: - Opus hatasız tek seferde tamamladı 🎉 Codex 2 kez hatalı yazdı. 👎🏻 Hız: - Codex 10 dakikada yazdı 🎉 Opus 19 dakikada 👎🏻 Agentic Coding; - Opus hiçbir müdahale ve plan olmadan fazlara bölüp yazdı 🎉 Codex direk search ve thinking yaparak yazdı 👎🏻👎🏻

Alican Kiraz

49,381 次观看 • 7 个月前

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:
0:39

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:

Instant

18,962 次观看 • 7 个月前

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions
6:19

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions

Mo

65,563 次观看 • 7 个月前

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code
0:20

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code

Abhinav

447,873 次观看 • 7 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.
3:53

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

59,604 次观看 • 7 个月前

Clone a functional Billion $$ SAAS Part 2 - Figma. Now that Claude Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 are available, I decided to try this again. The result - CanvasKit Tools used - Windsurf (retired) Cascade & OpenAI Codex CLI First agent run - 30 minutes Total time spent w/ extra prompting - 3 hours I think this could be a new metric for model evaluations - TTBS (time to billion $$ SAAS 😂) Code and details below:
0:34

Clone a functional Billion $$ SAAS Part 2 - Figma. Now that Claude Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 are available, I decided to try this again. The result - CanvasKit Tools used - Windsurf (retired) Cascade & OpenAI Codex CLI First agent run - 30 minutes Total time spent w/ extra prompting - 3 hours I think this could be a new metric for model evaluations - TTBS (time to billion $$ SAAS 😂) Code and details below:

nader dabit

30,271 次观看 • 7 个月前

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.
0:29

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.

Martin Woodward

65,575 次观看 • 7 个月前

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!
0:36

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!

1LittleCoder💻

142,933 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇵🇱 Dzisiaj stworzyłem Claude Code Math Prover (13-minutowy film pokazuje jak to działa). Claude Code Opus 4.6 orkiestruje cały przepływ pracy. Deleguje podzadania do różnych agentów: - OpenAI Codex 5.3 (badacz, rozwiązuje, recenzent) - jak widać można używać równolegle i Codex'a i Claude Code. - Claude Code (planista, rozwiązuje). - Wykorzystuje MCP poprzez lean-lsp-mcp dowodzenie twierdzeń za pomocą Lean. Używam Team Agents z tmux do pokazania jak Claude Code deleguje zadania do Codex i do siebie ale do subagentów. SKILL - codex - napisałem skilla do orkiestracji Codex'a -------------------- 🇬🇧Claude Code Math Prover (13-minute video) I made today. Claude Code Opus 4.6 orchestrates the workflow. It delegates subtasks to different agents: - OpenAI Codex 5.3 (researcher, solver, reviewer) - so we can use both solution Codex ad Claude Code - Claude Code (planner, solver). - It uses MCP via lean-lsp-mcp, which enables agentic interaction with the Lean theorem prover. I use Claude Code team agents for this task so you can see how Claude Code delegate all task. SKILL - I wrote skill for codex orchestration
13:43

🇵🇱 Dzisiaj stworzyłem Claude Code Math Prover (13-minutowy film pokazuje jak to działa). Claude Code Opus 4.6 orkiestruje cały przepływ pracy. Deleguje podzadania do różnych agentów: - OpenAI Codex 5.3 (badacz, rozwiązuje, recenzent) - jak widać można używać równolegle i Codex'a i Claude Code. - Claude Code (planista, rozwiązuje). - Wykorzystuje MCP poprzez lean-lsp-mcp dowodzenie twierdzeń za pomocą Lean. Używam Team Agents z tmux do pokazania jak Claude Code deleguje zadania do Codex i do siebie ale do subagentów. SKILL - codex - napisałem skilla do orkiestracji Codex'a -------------------- 🇬🇧Claude Code Math Prover (13-minute video) I made today. Claude Code Opus 4.6 orchestrates the workflow. It delegates subtasks to different agents: - OpenAI Codex 5.3 (researcher, solver, reviewer) - so we can use both solution Codex ad Claude Code - Claude Code (planner, solver). - It uses MCP via lean-lsp-mcp, which enables agentic interaction with the Lean theorem prover. I use Claude Code team agents for this task so you can see how Claude Code delegate all task. SKILL - I wrote skill for codex orchestration

Remek Kinas

46,691 次观看 • 7 个月前

Cursor Max : Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 🔥 İki LLM'e aynı prompt'u verdim: "Python'da 25.000 parçacıklı bir Galaxy Simulator yaz. Fizik, bloom, trail, cinematic kamera, determinizm ve headless mod hepsi olsun." Detaylı promptu yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Kodların karşılaştırmasını Codex 5.3 Extra High yaptı. Karşılaştırmada isim yerine A ve B LLM'leri olarak verdim. A) Gemini 3.1 Pro - 1/6 B) Opus 4.6 - 5/6 Hız: A modeli 9 buçuk dakikada, B modeli ise 15 dakikada teslim etti. Analiz: Fark sadece sürede değil, derinlikte: 🔬 Fizik: A basit Plummer sphere + semi-implicit Euler. Spiral kollar zamanla eriyor. B flat rotation curve + density-wave perturbation + Velocity-Verlet. Kollar korunuyor, enerji drift runtime'da izleniyor. 🎨 Rendering: A tek geçiş bloom, tek piksel parçacık. B üç ölçekli bloom pipeline, 3×3 Gaussian stamp, parallax starfield (twinkle dahil), dust lane efekti, core glow. 🎥 Kamera: A framerate-bağımlı lerp. B framerate-independent exp decay + otomatik cinematic orbit. 🧬 Determinizm: A legacy np.random.seed (global, fragile). B np.random.Generator (instance-based, sağlam). 🏗️ Mimari: A düz sınıflar, ~600 satır. B dataclass preset sistemi, LUT-based palette, SeedManager, PerfTracker, README dahil ~1300+ satır. A işi yapan hızlı bir prototip. B yayınlanabilir bir demo. Ekstra 5 dakika → kategorik kalite farkı.
0:50

Cursor Max : Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 🔥 İki LLM'e aynı prompt'u verdim: "Python'da 25.000 parçacıklı bir Galaxy Simulator yaz. Fizik, bloom, trail, cinematic kamera, determinizm ve headless mod hepsi olsun." Detaylı promptu yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Kodların karşılaştırmasını Codex 5.3 Extra High yaptı. Karşılaştırmada isim yerine A ve B LLM'leri olarak verdim. A) Gemini 3.1 Pro - 1/6 B) Opus 4.6 - 5/6 Hız: A modeli 9 buçuk dakikada, B modeli ise 15 dakikada teslim etti. Analiz: Fark sadece sürede değil, derinlikte: 🔬 Fizik: A basit Plummer sphere + semi-implicit Euler. Spiral kollar zamanla eriyor. B flat rotation curve + density-wave perturbation + Velocity-Verlet. Kollar korunuyor, enerji drift runtime'da izleniyor. 🎨 Rendering: A tek geçiş bloom, tek piksel parçacık. B üç ölçekli bloom pipeline, 3×3 Gaussian stamp, parallax starfield (twinkle dahil), dust lane efekti, core glow. 🎥 Kamera: A framerate-bağımlı lerp. B framerate-independent exp decay + otomatik cinematic orbit. 🧬 Determinizm: A legacy np.random.seed (global, fragile). B np.random.Generator (instance-based, sağlam). 🏗️ Mimari: A düz sınıflar, ~600 satır. B dataclass preset sistemi, LUT-based palette, SeedManager, PerfTracker, README dahil ~1300+ satır. A işi yapan hızlı bir prototip. B yayınlanabilir bir demo. Ekstra 5 dakika → kategorik kalite farkı.

Alican Kiraz

29,323 次观看 • 7 个月前

You can now run Codex & Claude Code from your phone. I added it to The Vibe Companion. Claude Code or Codex, same UI, no extra API costs. Pick your agent. Ship from anywhere. Install -> bunx the-vibe-companion
0:24

You can now run Codex & Claude Code from your phone. I added it to The Vibe Companion. Claude Code or Codex, same UI, no extra API costs. Pick your agent. Ship from anywhere. Install -> bunx the-vibe-companion

Stan Girard

28,418 次观看 • 7 个月前

4.7 milyar dolarlık şirket. 4 dakikada klonlandı. Claude Code Opus 4.6, Duolingo’nun tamamını üretiyor. Frontend, backend, auth. Yazılım şirketleri artık ne satıyor? Kod değil — topluluk, marka, dağıtım. Bunu henüz fark etmeyenler için saat işliyor. 👇
0:37

4.7 milyar dolarlık şirket. 4 dakikada klonlandı. Claude Code Opus 4.6, Duolingo’nun tamamını üretiyor. Frontend, backend, auth. Yazılım şirketleri artık ne satıyor? Kod değil — topluluk, marka, dağıtım. Bunu henüz fark etmeyenler için saat işliyor. 👇

Berk Aladag

228,521 次观看 • 6 个月前

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode
0:54

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode

Harshith

46,850 次观看 • 6 个月前

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro
1:09

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro

Harshith

72,450 次观看 • 6 个月前

Claude Fable 5 (extra high) Limbo Clone:
0:43

Claude Fable 5 (extra high) Limbo Clone:

Chris

53,195 次观看 • 3 个月前

Testleri yaptım; Cursor’da Plan’sız olarak direk Agent modülüyle yaptım. 👑 Gemini 3 Pro Hız, Maliyet ve Kalite’de açık ara en iyi çıktı bence. ☠️ GPT 5.1 Codex High Fast çalışan bir çıktı bile veremedi… 🧠 En iyi Planlamayı Claude Modelleri yaptı. Hız sıralaması; - Gemini 3 Pro > Opus4.1 > Sonnet4.5 > GPT-5.1-Codex High Fast Test Prompt: Write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically.
2:37

Testleri yaptım; Cursor’da Plan’sız olarak direk Agent modülüyle yaptım. 👑 Gemini 3 Pro Hız, Maliyet ve Kalite’de açık ara en iyi çıktı bence. ☠️ GPT 5.1 Codex High Fast çalışan bir çıktı bile veremedi… 🧠 En iyi Planlamayı Claude Modelleri yaptı. Hız sıralaması; - Gemini 3 Pro > Opus4.1 > Sonnet4.5 > GPT-5.1-Codex High Fast Test Prompt: Write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically.

Alican Kiraz

149,106 次观看 • 10 个月前

I JUST BUILT A $DOG FPS VIDEO GAME USING CODEX 5.5 EXTRA HIGH!!!!!!!!! THE GOAL IS TO KILL AS MANY TESTNET MEMECOINS AS YOU CAN WHILE THE WAVES GET PROGRESSIVELY HARDER
0:26

I JUST BUILT A $DOG FPS VIDEO GAME USING CODEX 5.5 EXTRA HIGH!!!!!!!!! THE GOAL IS TO KILL AS MANY TESTNET MEMECOINS AS YOU CAN WHILE THE WAVES GET PROGRESSIVELY HARDER

Leonidas 🧡 $DOG

22,091 次观看 • 4 个月前

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins
0:24

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins

Beff (e/acc)

28,349 次观看 • 7 个月前

Asked Codex to add Doom into Codex. Only runs the game while Codex is at work: the harder the task, the longer the play time. Turn off fast mode and setting extra high reasoning might also help. You think Andrew Ambrosino will accept my PR? 😂
0:54

Asked Codex to add Doom into Codex. Only runs the game while Codex is at work: the harder the task, the longer the play time. Turn off fast mode and setting extra high reasoning might also help. You think Andrew Ambrosino will accept my PR? 😂

dominik kundel

21,924 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tamam, yenildik ve kötü oynadık. Ama iki pozisyon arasındaki fark ne? İki pozisyon da kırmızı kartsa kırmızı, değilse değil. Aynı standardı uygulamak bu kadar zor mu?
0:30

Tamam, yenildik ve kötü oynadık. Ama iki pozisyon arasındaki fark ne? İki pozisyon da kırmızı kartsa kırmızı, değilse değil. Aynı standardı uygulamak bu kadar zor mu?

Harrry Kewelll 10 🇳🇬

26,073 次观看 • 4 天前