正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Cursor— Codex-5.2 Extra-High vs Opus 4.6 Max’ı Google Earth Mini task’ı ile kıyasladım🔥 Hata: - Opus hatasız tek seferde tamamladı 🎉 Codex 2 kez hatalı yazdı. 👎🏻 Hız: - Codex 10 dakikada yazdı 🎉 Opus 19 dakikada 👎🏻 Agentic Coding; - Opus hiçbir müdahale ve plan olmadan fazlara bölüp... show more

Alican Kiraz

26,401 subscribers

49,381 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Codex 5.3 EXTRA HIGH ve Claude Opus 4.6'yı ringe çıkardım. Sonuç gerçekten çok acayip. Genelde "Extra High" ayarı açınca modellerin kaplumbağaya dönmesini beklersiniz değil mi? Ben de öyle sanıyordum. İki tarafa da birebir aynı promptu verdim, tek bir virgül bile değiştirmedim. Claude'u yeni gelen "agent team" özelliğiyle sahaya sürdüm, Codex'i ise kendi app'i içinde agent ile başlattım. Kenara çekilip kahvemi aldım, izliyorum. Claude paşa paşa çalıştı, işini 22 dakikada bitirdi. Ama Codex? Codex resmen şov yaptı. Extra High modunda olmasına rağmen 14 dakikada görevi tamamladı. Arada 8 dakika fark var, boru değil. Hız konusunda bu kadar fark olacağını hiç beklemiyordum. Video aşağıda, iki tarafın da performansını karşılaştırın. Sizin düşünceleriniz ne? Sol Video Opus 4.6, Sağ Video Codex 5.3 Extra High

Codex 5.3 EXTRA HIGH ve Claude Opus 4.6'yı ringe çıkardım. Sonuç gerçekten çok acayip. Genelde "Extra High" ayarı açınca modellerin kaplumbağaya dönmesini beklersiniz değil mi? Ben de öyle sanıyordum. İki tarafa da birebir aynı promptu verdim, tek bir virgül bile değiştirmedim. Claude'u yeni gelen "agent team" özelliğiyle sahaya sürdüm, Codex'i ise kendi app'i içinde agent ile başlattım. Kenara çekilip kahvemi aldım, izliyorum. Claude paşa paşa çalıştı, işini 22 dakikada bitirdi. Ama Codex? Codex resmen şov yaptı. Extra High modunda olmasına rağmen 14 dakikada görevi tamamladı. Arada 8 dakika fark var, boru değil. Hız konusunda bu kadar fark olacağını hiç beklemiyordum. Video aşağıda, iki tarafın da performansını karşılaştırın. Sizin düşünceleriniz ne? Sol Video Opus 4.6, Sağ Video Codex 5.3 Extra High

Baha Gökce

17,863 次观看 • 4 个月前

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions

Mo

65,361 次观看 • 4 个月前

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code

Abhinav

447,814 次观看 • 4 个月前

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:

Instant

18,895 次观看 • 4 个月前

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Alican Kiraz

29,338 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

58,811 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dostlar Selamlar 🙏🏻 Cursor’da Opus 4.5 thinking-high, gemini-3-pro, gpt-5-pro, kimi-k2, grok-4 fast’i kıyasladım. Promptlarada ekten ulaşabilirsiniz 🙏🏻🧡 Bence kazanan Opus 4.5 🔥 Stage 1: Basic - Grok-4 Fast / 9 sec, wrote 57 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 10 sec, wrote 70 lines. - Gemini-3 Pro / 36 seconds, wrote 107 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 40 sec, wrote 88 lines. - ChatGPT-5 Pro / 3m 31 sec, wrote 85 lines. Stage 2 : Complex - Grok-4-Fast / 14 sec, wrote 129 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 19 sec, wrote 127 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 21 sec, wrote 156 lines. - Gemini 3 Pro / 38 sec, wrote 127 lines. - GPT-5 Pro / 5m 57 sec, wrote 166 lines. Stage 3: Hard - Gemini 3 Pro / 39 sec, 212 satır yazdı. - Opus 4.5 / 2m 4 sec, 724 satır yazdı. - Grok-4-Fast / 2m 13 sec, 195 satır yazdı. - Kimi K2 / Crash Loop - - GPT-5 Pro / Kill - 30-40 minutes

Dostlar Selamlar 🙏🏻 Cursor’da Opus 4.5 thinking-high, gemini-3-pro, gpt-5-pro, kimi-k2, grok-4 fast’i kıyasladım. Promptlarada ekten ulaşabilirsiniz 🙏🏻🧡 Bence kazanan Opus 4.5 🔥 Stage 1: Basic - Grok-4 Fast / 9 sec, wrote 57 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 10 sec, wrote 70 lines. - Gemini-3 Pro / 36 seconds, wrote 107 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 40 sec, wrote 88 lines. - ChatGPT-5 Pro / 3m 31 sec, wrote 85 lines. Stage 2 : Complex - Grok-4-Fast / 14 sec, wrote 129 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 19 sec, wrote 127 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 21 sec, wrote 156 lines. - Gemini 3 Pro / 38 sec, wrote 127 lines. - GPT-5 Pro / 5m 57 sec, wrote 166 lines. Stage 3: Hard - Gemini 3 Pro / 39 sec, 212 satır yazdı. - Opus 4.5 / 2m 4 sec, 724 satır yazdı. - Grok-4-Fast / 2m 13 sec, 195 satır yazdı. - Kimi K2 / Crash Loop - - GPT-5 Pro / Kill - 30-40 minutes

Alican Kiraz

14,936 次观看 • 6 个月前

Finally did the "opus vs codex" video I've been thinking about for months. tl;dr - I use both every day, and I think you should too.

Finally did the "opus vs codex" video I've been thinking about for months. tl;dr - I use both every day, and I think you should too.

Theo - t3.gg

146,595 次观看 • 3 个月前

OpenClaw creator on Opus vs Codex: “Opus is like the coworker that is a little silly sometimes, but it's really funny and you keep him around. Codex is like the weirdo in the corner that you don't want to talk to, but he's reliable and gets shit done.” LMAO. Accurate.

OpenClaw creator on Opus vs Codex: “Opus is like the coworker that is a little silly sometimes, but it's really funny and you keep him around. Codex is like the weirdo in the corner that you don't want to talk to, but he's reliable and gets shit done.” LMAO. Accurate.

Bilawal Sidhu

429,731 次观看 • 3 个月前

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,512 次观看 • 4 个月前

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.

Martin Woodward

65,561 次观看 • 3 个月前

- ผมไม่ชอบโดนหักหลัง มัน👎🏻👎🏻 ((-100)) - คุณคิดว่าผมจะรักคุณจริงหรอ 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 ((-10000000000)) แล้วจิระร้องไห้เป็นสายน้ำเลยยย หัวใจคนเป็นแม่มันเจ็บนัก #BurnoutSyndromeSeriesEP6

- ผมไม่ชอบโดนหักหลัง มัน👎🏻👎🏻 ((-100)) - คุณคิดว่าผมจะรักคุณจริงหรอ 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 ((-10000000000)) แล้วจิระร้องไห้เป็นสายน้ำเลยยย หัวใจคนเป็นแม่มันเจ็บนัก #BurnoutSyndromeSeriesEP6

OFFGUN_FAMILY

779,278 次观看 • 5 个月前

للأسف يا بدر الي شار عليك انك تظهر بهذا المظهر ما يبيلك الخير كان بالإمكان افضل من هذا الظهور 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

للأسف يا بدر الي شار عليك انك تظهر بهذا المظهر ما يبيلك الخير كان بالإمكان افضل من هذا الظهور 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

ضمير الرياضه 🤙🏻 نصار المهيني 🤍

1,906,118 次观看 • 1 年前

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins

Beff (e/acc)

28,349 次观看 • 3 个月前

طلعو الموظف أجل ؟ خذ ديسلايكااات 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

طلعو الموظف أجل ؟ خذ ديسلايكااات 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

شَكّة

409,798 次观看 • 3 个月前

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode

Harshith

46,632 次观看 • 2 个月前

#النصر_الهلال 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 والله اذا ماطيروه قبل النخبه باي باي اسيا النخبه تذكروها

Sensitive content

#النصر_الهلال 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 والله اذا ماطيروه قبل النخبه باي باي اسيا النخبه تذكروها

༄ ثاني العالم Otaibi خالد༄💙

33,661 次观看 • 1 年前

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro

Harshith

70,631 次观看 • 2 个月前